Timeline

# AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence Release date and time 2415/07/20256 11:30am AEST In accordance with the [Policy for responsible use of A … g: - using machine learning to apply standard classifications to data, and. - using a generative AI chatbot as part of the [Census Test](https://info.census.abs.gov.au/about/census-test). The chatbot is available on the Census website to provide help and support for the Census. - using generative AI in the development and review of written content, such as summarising documents and transcribing meeting notes. ## Public interaction and impact The public will have the opportunity to use a generative AI chatbot to obtain information about the Census Test in August 2025We will continue exploring additional AI opportunities as technologies evolve. This may include using AI for testing and assurance purposes. These uses would not involve public interaction, personal information or market sensitive information. Any outputs would be subject to review by ABS employees. ## Public interaction and impact The public will have the opportunity to use a generative AI chatbot to obtain information about the Census in August 2026. The chatbot uses a pre-written knowledge base and does not learn from user input. It is designed to operate without collecting personal information and automatically removes any personal details that are entered, ensuring your privacy is protected. The public do not have direct interaction with any other systems th … ## AI governance We have established governance processes and forums which we are further strengthening to assess and review potential business uses of AI. These arrangements … pproach to the adoption of AI, particularly for public facing systems. All ABS staff who use AI are required to complete AI training and must agree to abide by ABS AI acceptable use directives. We use forms of AI which are transparent and traceable, presenting l … nce with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. We comply with the Policy for responsible use of AI in government and have: - designated policy implementation to an accountable official, - made this publicly available statement outlining our approach to AI adoption and use Our approach to AI has considered the Privacy Act (1988) and the Census and Statistics Act (1905), and complies with these requirements. We comply with the Policy for responsible use of AI in government and have: - appointed an accountable official who is responsible for implementing the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government, - appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) who will lead AI transformation at the ABS as part of the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025, and - provided AI fundamentals training to staff. This transparency statement was published to our website on 165th July 20256, and will be updated every 12 months or as our approach to AI changes …

… icial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. As tThe NZEA is currently operating on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) ICT systems and policies, our use of and approach to AI aligns with [PM&C’s AI Transparency Statehas aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.pmcdigital.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-reporting/artificial-intelligence-ai-sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency- statement) and [_Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-s. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles). Thes we have been adaopted below. Our approach to AI transparency:, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should … an-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be … - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled, and people responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the accouneptable for the outcomes of the AI systems. The NZEA has committed to the Digital Information Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf) Wuse of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be use AId in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Empl … tegrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) In addition to _Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_ , the NZEA has adopted the following 6 AI principles: 1. Only AI tools that are authorised for access and use within PM&C’s ICT systems are to be deployed. 1. Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. 1. AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. 1. AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services. 1. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Employment Principals and Code of Conduct. 1. The NZEA will not use AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or interventionThe NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to helpensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and the requirement to adhere to both internal and external pols. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable officiesal. We are dedicated to fostering public trust by ensuring AI-driven processes remain **ethical, responsible, and## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to aligned with the interests of the Australian Government** while still being able to harness AI benefitsechnology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on PM&Cthe NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact [Help-ITSthe NZEA at [itserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au](mailto:Help-ITSitserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au). ## Search

[Digital Transformation Agency policy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) for responsible AIrtificial Intelligence (AI) use sets mandatory requirements for the National Health Funding Body' …

… or%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) **On this page** ## Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Transparency i …

… rrent approach to using automation and Artificial Intelligence (AI). ## on this page - How we use automation and AI safely and responsibly - What we use automation and AI for - Our accountable official - Who to contact We’ll review it at least once a year and update it if we make any majo …

Share Print 18 June 2026 **On this page:** - The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption. - The **AI transparency statement** explains how AI is used. # Strategic position on AI adoption The PBO’s strategic position on A …

… tement, please [contact us](https://www.donatelife.gov.au/contact-us). Back to top

… res/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public) - ## On this page # Our AI transparency statement \_\_ Published: 20 February 2025 \_\ …

… and/or when significant changes occur. Page published: 27 Feb 2025 ## Need help? Our librarians are here to guide you. [Ask a librarian](https://www.library.gov.au/services/contact-us/ask-librarian)

# Privacy and disclosures On this page # Privacy and disclosures We are committed to treating complaints ser … g, document summary, content creation and basic secretariat support. #### #### Our _potential_ usage patterns are outlined below: Usage pattern …

On this page: The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe an …

… .gov.au) or see the details on the contact us page of the NBA website. Back to top

# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ##### On this page ## Introduction Jobs and Skills Australia (JSA) recognises the transf …

… ,300,575\ Internal services | $1,551,921\ **Total** | **$2,852,496** ## ## Ministerial Statement of Expectations and Regulator Statement of In … ng/Employer-Statement-WGEA.pdf?rev=832ed8cd1df74be695d4125790a3493b) ## Other governance frameworks Our activities throughout the year are al …

… se AI - how we ensure quality and safety - the different types of AI BACK TO TOP ## Services covered by this statement While we do not use AI across a … digital infrastructure - National Health Services Directory (NHSD) BACK TO TOP ## Why does Healthdirect use AI? ### To improve quality and safety H … heir time on the highest value work such as engaging with consumers. BACK TO TOP ## How do we use AI? Healthdirect uses AI for the following purposes. … ov.au/quality-and-safety-of-healthdirects-triage-service-statement). BACK TO TOP ## Where you may interact with AI without human assistance Healthdire … line with Healthdirect’s clinical and content governance processes. BACK TO TOP ## Ensuring quality and safety of healthcare Healthdirect’s [Clinical … t.gov.au/evaluations](https://about.healthdirect.gov.au/evaluations) BACK TO TOP ## Future use of AI In the future, Healthdirect will consider the use … I assistants). - Continue to improve our own workplace productivity. BACK TO TOP ## Definitions ##### What is AI? AI is the ability of a computer sys … y learning from data patterns and predicting a response to requests. BACK TO TOP ## How to contact us about our use of AI You can contact our Chief In … hts Officer\ Healthdirect Australia\ PO Box K411\ Haymarket NSW 1240\ Australia BACK TO TOP Last reviewed: June 2026

… ntelligence (**AI**) and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. On this page: - Definition of artificial intelligence - How we use AI - Public Interaction - How we comply with the DTA Policy and other legislation - Enquiries about how we use AI Content We recognise that AI presents unique opportunities to innovat …

… y to improve services, inform policy, and support quality education. ## On this page: The Department of Education recognises the opportunities artificial in …

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 2 April 2026 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance 1. Consultation with the … government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). Back to top ## Our Approach to AI DVA is modernising its technology systems to en … ays that build trust across the veteran community and our workforce. Back to top ## Robust AI Governance DVA’s AI Policy sets out principles, risk‑man … ety and oversight of AI initiatives and this transparency statement. Back to top ## Consultation with the Veteran Community DVA is committed to transp … e to improved outcomes and services for veterans and their families. Back to top ## Adoption of AI in DVA DVA adopts the [Organisation for Economic Co … government](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification). Back to top ## Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation DVA … priate human oversight - ‘human in the loop’ is a guiding principle. Back to top ## Compliance As part of our adoption of AI technology, DVA ensures c … [Federal Register of Legislation](https://www.legislation.gov.au/). Back to top ## Review and Contact DVA meets mandatory requirements of the Policy … table Official (October 2024). DVA has appointed a Chief AI Officer. For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our ado … age of AI, please contact us at [AI@dva.gov.au](mailto:AI@dva.gov.au). Back to top

… secure, and well-paid work with the skills for a sustainable future. ## On this page: DEWR use of AI is transparent, responsible, and aligned with legislati …

Skip to page navigation # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement This page explains h …

Skip to content or footer close info For Australian businesses experiencing supply chain volat …

## On this page - Introduction - How we use AI - Usage patterns and domains - Data privacy and security - AI safety and governance - Compliance with AI in Government Policy - Contact information ## Introduction AUSTRAC performs a dual role as Australia’s anti-mone …

### On this page ### The Administrative Review Tribunal (The Tribunal) is committed to iden …

Skip to the content # About ARPC [Home](https://arpc.gov.au) [About us](https://arpc.gov. …

… xpectations for the use of AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors. ## Use of generative artificial intelligence in ARC grant programs - app …

… tement, please contact:\ AI Accountable Official – [email protected] Go back to top Feedback

… irements for AFSA's accountable official and transparency statement. Skip to body content ## On this page ## AI transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA … rther enquiries, contact:**[info@afsa.gov.au](mailto:info@afsa.gov.au) [Back to top](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ai-transparency-statement)

# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement On this page The [policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in …

# Planning and priorities We set strategic plans and priorities to guide our work and the benefits we aim to deliver. ## On this page ## Corporate plan Our [corporate plan](https://www.acma.gov.au/public …

## On this page ## How we intend to use AI The ACCC uses artificial intelligence (AI) …

… eral enquiry form](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/general-enquiry-form). Back to top of the page

Share Print 18 June 2026 **On this page:** - The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption. - The **AI transparency statement** explains how AI is used. # Strategi …

… nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Wed, 2026-05-06 12:00 Acknowledgement of Country The NHFB acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia, and their continuing connection to land, water and community. We pay our respects to them and their cultures and to Elders both past and present. 

… never significant changes occur. The most recent update was made in Junely 2026. For enquiries, please [contact us](https://www.cgc.gov.au/contact-us).

# AI Transparency Statement 7 April3 July 2026 The Federal Court of Australia Listed Entity1 (the Entity) is c … own policies relating to privacy, data and information technology. As required by the Plan, a Chief AI Officer will beas appointed byin Julyne 2026 and has responsibility for championing strategic change and driving adoption and engagement with AI. Two Accountable Officials are nominated under the Policy and have r …

Effective as of NovemberJune 20256 ## Introduction At Healthdirect Australia, we are committed to deli … so known as 1800MEDICARE, and NURSE-ON-CALL helpline in Victoria) - healthdirect GP helpline1800MEDICARE (GP) - Pregnancy, Birth and Baby - health alert lines - Digital servic … e following purposes. ### Service delivery - To support the decision -making of our nurses who provide advice to consumers on the healthdirect helpline, (also known as 1800MEDICARE, and NURSE-ON-CALL helpline in Victoria (using Infermedica triage tool). - To make tailored recommendations as to what healthcare you should seek when using the healthdirect Symptom Checker (using Infermedica triage tool). Recommendations are responsive to the information you have provided … cern. - To analyse and improve service delivery quality and efficiency. (using Microsoft CoPilot and Claude Enterprise). - To translate some information on our website into languages other than English (using Google Translate). - To assist the GPs on 1800MEDICARE (GP) to record details about the consultation in our system by using an AI-scribe (using either Heidi or Lyrebird) ### Visual content generation - We sometimes use generative AI tech … tions and graphics, that may appear in our reports and on our websites (using Adobe Firefly). - All AI-generated visuals are reviewed by humans to make sure they … nagement activities before testing and assurance by our technical team (using Microsoft Copilot and AWS Kiro). This classification of how we use AI is based on guidelines develop … ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) You can read more about the AI software and systems we use in our [Quality and safety of Healthdirect’s triage service statement](https://about.healthdirect.gov.au/quality-and-safety-of-healthdirects-triage-service-statement). BACK TO TOP ## Where you may interact with AI without human assistanc … fied professionals both within Healthdirect and our technology partner Infermedica. You do not have to enter personally identifiable information into t … tive AI. Healthdirect monitors the performance of the Symptom Checker, and our Clinical Governance team are actively involved in its management to ensure it meets national quality and safety standards. The Healthdirect website may use AI to translate content for people who speak languages other than English. Translated information is general only, is not a substitute for professional advice, and may contain errors and inaccuracies. Every translated page seeks feedback from the consumer on whether the translation is clear and easy to understand. To manage this risk, Healthdirect regularly undertakes quality assurance measures, including considering consumer feedback, targeted reviews of translations, and regular monitoring and reporting. Where we identify issues we will address these and may disable translations in line with Healthdirect’s clinical and content governance processes. BACK TO TOP ## Ensuring quality and safety of healthcare Healthdirec … mprove service accessibility, for example through language translation on our phone line. - Simplify and summarise health information to make it easier for consumers to understand and follow our advice, both in Healthdirect controlled interfaces and outside (such as in commercially offered AI assistants). - Continue to improve our own workplace productivity. BACK TO TOP … recommendations. ##### Generative AI (‘Gen’ AI) This type of AI is an emerging field based on machine learning that can create new content, such as … Box K411\ Haymarket NSW 1240\ Australia BACK TO TOP Last reviewed: NovemberJune 20256

# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The CGCommonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) follows the [pPolicy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital … rvice-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). ### Key roles The CGC has designated the Chief Operating Officer as the aan Accountable oOfficial for aArtificial iIntelligence (AI) use within the agency. Accountable Officials arewho is responsible for overseeing the implementingation of the [pPolicy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). AThe CGC has a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part ofwho, working with the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformaAccountable Official, is responsible for championing and driving AI adoption atin the CGC. ### AI Adoption The CGC's endorsed AI applications are use … mplies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) (PSPF) and [Information Security Manual](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-frameworks/ism) (ISM). The CGC have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, an … henever significant changes occur. The most recent update was made in March 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Operating Officer at [services@cgc.gov.au](mailto:ISBCoord@treasury.gov.au?subject=AI%20transparency%20statement%20enquiry)June 2026.

… Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au](mailto:communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au).

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement Published date 28 February 2025 Professional Services Review (PSR) is adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) in ways## Adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption of AI at Professional Services Review (PSR) is consistent with its values of being fair, transparent and professional. Adoption is deliberate and measured to support AI use that areis safe, ethical and responsible. PSR’s approach to adopting AI is mostin accordance with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and is influenced by the opportunities to enhance workplace productivity. PSR is engaging with AI according to Adoption of AI respects Australia’s AI Ethics principles emphasprioritising privacy protection and security, transparency and explainability, and accountability and is consistent with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. ## Monitoring and accountability PSR’s General Manager (GM. ## Monitoring and accountability PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) monitors the adoption of AI consistent with internal policies such as ‘Acceptable Use of ICT Resources’ which expressly prohibits PSR from using sensitive or personal information on public generative AI platforms as well as relevant government legislation, regulations, policies and official guidance including the _Privacy Act 1988_ and secrecy provisions of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_. PSR’s Chief Information Governance and Security Officer (CIGSO), designated as the Accountable Officer (AO) for AI, is charged with implementing and compliance with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government across PSR. The GM is a member of PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) which has oversight of all PSR governance decisCIGSO leads the Information Governance Committee (IGC) which is responsible for coordinating the management of PSR’s informations and frameworks. The EMT has identified AI as an emerging risk but does not disregard its potential for improving operational processes and reporting that may inform and gain insights when applied responsibly. Tssets including AI and identifying emerging risks. The IGC regularly reports to PSR’s EMT. PSR’s General Manager (GM), a member of the EMT, is monitoring the adoption of AI consistent with internal policies such as ‘Acceptable Use of ICT Resources’ which expressly prohibits PSR from using sensitive or personal information on open web-based generative designated as the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer (CAIO) in line with the Government’s [AI pPlatn forms as well as relevant government legislation, regulations, policies and official guidance including secrecy provisions of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_ the Australian Public Service](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). The CAIO is responsible for driving AI adoption at PSR. The adoption of AI in PSR will beis supported by training. ## How we use AI PSR uses AI in ways that complements and improves on operational efficiency while keeping a human in the loop. PSR is considering AI usage in a longer-term timeframe with specific regard to: - further opportunities to automate internal business enabling processes and in … roductivity. Any content created using generative AI is to facilitate and enhanced internal communications and in the performance of routine tasks. PSR does not use AI for any of its statutory functions administering the PSR Scheme under Part VAA of the _Health Insurance Act 1973._ Decision-making within this framework is not open to machine-based inferences or unqualified interpretations(the Act). The decision -makers at each stage of the PSR Scheme are experienced medical practit … health professionals to make highly complex and evaluative decisions. The level of risk is such that decisions under the PSR Scheme are not appropriate for AI or automated decision making Under Part VAA of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_ , PSR’s administrative decision-makers may exercise discretionary power. PSR accepts the original view of the [Administrative Review Council](https://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/report-46.pdf) (ARC), that automating discretion comes with a risk of improper and invalid exercise of power. While the [Commonwealth Ombudsman](https://www.ombudsman.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/317437/Automated-Decision-Making-Better-Practice-Guide-March-2025.pdf) has more recently noted that automated systems may support discretionary decision making when properly designed and modeled, PSR remains of the view that the level of risk is such that it is not appropriate for decisions under the PSR Scheme to be made or influenced by automated systems including AI. ## Domains PSR currently applies its use of AI within Corporate and Enabling functions for internal communications. ## Review . ## Review This transparency statement was last updated in February 2026. It will be updated annually and following any event that may significa … further information about this statement or PSR’s usage of AI, please [contact [feedback@psr.gov.au](mailto:feedback@us](https://www.psr.gov.au/contact). [Download PSR Artificial Intelligence (AI) tI Transparency sStatement 2025.pdf.PDF6](https://www.psr.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-03/PSR%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%28AI%29%20tI%20Transparency%20Statement%202026.pdf "PSR AI Transparency%20s Statement% 2020256.pdf.PDF) - 290.98") - 182.81 KB

Corporate ## ANAO’s artificial intelligence transparency statement Updated MonFriday 216 Julyne 20256 Contact Please direct enquiries through our [contact page](https://www.anao.gov.au/about/contact-us). The [policy for [responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) in government includes mandatory requirements to nominate accountable officials and publish AI [ transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/list-of-transparency-statements). This statement provides details of the Austr … iciency, while ensuring quality and transparency in decision-making. The ANAO willIn embraceing emerging technologies —y — which includinges AI — the ANAO will do so thoughtfully, while managing risk for safresponsible and effective useadoption. The ANAO Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy (the policy) outline … cal use of AI, with the intention of: - reducing the risk of using AI; - enabl to the ANAO; - upholding the highest ethical standards when using AI; and - increasenabling transparency in the use of AI at the ANAO. The policy limits the use of publicly available generative AI t … The policy is supported by existing ANAO security frameworks, policies, and guidance. The ANAO is exploring how generative AI can enhance th … gment and scepticism are fundamental to auditing standards. This work will continues through a trialthe adoption of Microsoft Copilot across the ANAO, as well as by monitoring emerging trends and learning from the exper … n Australia and internationally. ## ANAO’s use of AI tools The ANAO uses threeprimarily uses commercial, vendor‑provided AI tools within approved enterprise environments. The ANAO does not currently develop or deploy bespoke AI systems in‑house. The ANAO uses four enterprise applications that incorporate AI: - Nuix — Nuix is an eDi … calendar events) to deliver contextually aware productivity support. The ANAO is conducting a comprehensive trial of this tool in its environmentCopilot is considered low risk as it operates within the ANAO’s secure Microsoft 365 environment, does not use ANAO data to train AI models, and is subject to governance, audit logging and formal evaluation processes. - CTM Scout is a third-party platform that facilitates corporate travel bookings and features AI Chat Bot capabilities. Since this activity does not constitute audit work and involves only minimal personal information (such as staff name and date of birth), the associated risks are considered low. Therefore, an assessment under the ANAO Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy is not required. The ANAO manages AI use cases through structured governance, documentation and continuous evaluation processes. AI use cases are captured in an internal register, with outcomes and feedback used to inform understanding of benefits, risks and effectiveness. The ANAO actively monitors vendor-proposed changes to installed software within its IT environment — including and specifically for the introduction of new AI vendor-supplied functions — to identify any potential risks before the software update is installed. ## Public impact and protection Future development or customisation of AI tools is managed through ANAO’s project and change management frameworks and is subject to additional governance, risk assessment, and assurance processes. These processes include consideration of usability, productivity, security, privacy and audit implications. ## Classification of AI use The ANAO classifies its use of AI in accordance with the DTA [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). ### Usage patterns - Workplace productivity - Image processing - Analytics for insights ### Domains - Corporate and enabling ## Public impact and protection The ANAO may access personal information during audits and applies robust physical, information and personnel security policies to protect sensitive information and support secure, responsible audit work. The ANAO is committed to the safe and responsible use of AI products. All AI tools and their applications will be carefully considered to ensure there is benefit to the technology and it can be used safely and ethically. The ANAO does not use AI tools that interact directly with the public and considerassesses its current use of AI within the organisation to havAI use as low impact on the public. Given this assessment, no additional safeguards have been implemented in relation to. Existing security measures and policies are considered sufficient to manage public impact and protection risks. ## AI governance The Executive Board of Management (EBOM) is the A … rimary governing body and is responsible for overseeing the use of AI. Any AI application identified or implemented is The Auditor‑General has approved the ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy, which establishes the framework for responsible AI use across the organisation. AI applications are recorded in an internal register and reported to the IT StrategicSecurity & Information Technology Committee, (a sub-‑committee of EBOM. The Auditor-General approved the ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy. ## AI legislative compliance The ANAO complies with all relevant legislation and has not identified any breaches in the use of AI) which supports ongoing oversight and transparency. The use of AI is also subject to governance by Accountable Officials, who oversee implementation and report high‑risk use cases, including their intended application, risk assessment and sensitivities. For audit‑related activities, AI use must be documented in audit planning and subject to defined assurance processes, including testing, validation and review of outputs. These arrangements ensure that AI use cases are assessed, monitored and implemented with appropriate consideration of risks, impact and benefits. ## AI legislative compliance The ANAO complies with all relevant legislation in its use of AI, including requirements relating to privacy, security and confidentiality. The ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy establishes clear conditions to prevent misuse and ensures AI is applied in a responsible, safe and ethical manner. Ongoing monitoring, risk management and governance oversight supported by the ANAO’s quality and security frameworks provide assurance that AI use remains compliant across both public‑facing and internal operations. ANAO’s existing management processes provide staff with the ability to raise concerns relating to the use of AI, including security, privacy or data handling issues. These processes support the identification, assessment and management of risks associated with AI use and are supported by the ANAO’s broader incident management, governance and compliance frameworks. ## AI policy compliance The ANAO has: - implemented all elements ofmandatory requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency policy within the specified timelines; - appointed the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Digital Officer as the Accountable Officials for AI within the ANAO; and - a program to - appointed the Group Executive Director, Systems Assurance and Data Analytics, as the Chief AI Officer within the ANAO; and - informed all staff of the appropriate use and risks associated with the use of … including the implementation of mandatory AI fundamentals training. The ANAO continues to review its approach in line with Australian Government policy, including consideration of mechanisms to enhance transparency and public engagement regarding AI use. **Contact:** enquiries about this statement can be submitted to the ANAO via our [contact us](https://www.anao.gov.au/about/contact) page Approved for publication by Dr Caralee McLiesh PSM, Auditor-General for Australia

… ov.au/compliance-priorities "Compliance and enforcement priorities 20256–267") outline our key areas of focus for the year. They will guide our ef … fo@acma.gov.au). [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 20256–267 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)

… : [wgea@wgea.gov.au](mailto:wgea@wgea.gov.au) ## Review and updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. ## More WGEA policies ### [ WGEA privacy policy ](https://www.wgea.go …

… orate and Enabling functions for internal communications. ## Review It will be updated annually and following any event that may significantly influence PSR’s use of AI or materially impact the accuracy of this statement. ## Contact For further information about this statement or PSR’s usag …

… a.gov.au](mailto:Data.strategy@nema.gov.au). ### Review and Updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Copyright, trade marks and disclaimer Intellectual property rights pr …

… ed as the NCA’s accountable official. **AI Transparency Statement** It will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to our approach to AI, as outlined above. Should the NCA approve the use of AI, this statement will be updated t …

… table officials report to the MDBA Executive Board. ## Last updated It will be updated as our approach to AI evolves, and at least every 12 months. ## Contact For more information or enquiries about our adoption of AI …

… u](mailto:datagovernance@jobsandskills.gov.au). ## Review and Updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.

… ://www.ipea.gov.au/about-ipea/contact-ipea). **Review and updates** It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Authorised by Beth Pahl\ Acting Chief Information Officer\ Acting Chief Operating Officer\ 12 March 2026

… nfo@igis.gov.au](mailto:info@igis.gov.au). ##### Review and Updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. ## Financial Statements The Office’s financial statements are availab …

… more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. **Update Publication Date** | **Update Comment**\ ---|---\ 1 November …

… at [data@dewr.gov.au](mailto:data@dewr.gov.au). ## Review and updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.

… now and for any future technologies. ### Updates to this Statement It will be updated when making a significant change to the agency's approach to AI and when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy and at least every twelve months. Update publication date| Description\ ---|---\ 18/02/2025| AI Transpar …

… u ](mailto:digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au) ## Review and updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. On this page

Share Facebook X Email Print ### Go to section # Corporate governance Our corporate governance reflects the legislat …

… does not currently deploy AI in direct interactions with the public. We will review and update it at least annually, as our AI use matures or when a significant change is made to the agencies or the Government’s approach to AI. ### Contact For questions about this statement or further information …

… can create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.

… (https://www.seacare.gov.au/about-us/contact-us) page of this website. Page last reviewed: **1 months ago**

… re.gov.au/about/contact/contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **1 months ago**

… efits they accept, and all gifts or benefits accepted (valued at over $AUD$100 ex GST) must be publicly disclosed. The register is updated quarte … and Benefits Register](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-086/IGIS%20Gifts%20and%20Benefits%20Register%20Q43%2020245-256.pdf) ## Consultant Services Expenditure The Office makes public the …

… r work to support the overall mission of building a healthy Australia. GenAI is not relied upon for decision-making in NHMRC. Use of GenAI is limited to support functions (such as drafting, editing, summarising, structuring and supporting research analyses) and does not replace human authorship, decision-making or accountability. ## AI applications Following a [pilot](https://www.digital.gov.au/i … ff to focus on more complex and value-added activities. - Structuring and refining content in documents such as internal reports, publications and briefing materials. - Generating and debugging code used in systems and applications dev … analytics activities such as internally classifying research topics. ### Research and analysis support - GenAI may be used to assist with research, including summarising information, structuring analyses, and supporting the preparation of written materials such as reports, publications and briefing content. AI is used as a support tool only and does not replace human judgement or accountability. _Note: We also allow staff to access certain public GenAI tools in lin … existing forums integrating AI issues such as security and privacy. Staff remain responsible for verifying the accuracy and appropriateness of all AI-assisted outputs. ## Public impact and compliance We are committed to protecting the pu … ct any changes in our AI practices and policies. ### Update history - 19 June 2026: Updated version published. - 6 May 2026: Updated version published. - 26 February 2025: Initial v …

… es about Screen Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [email protected]communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au](mailto:communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au).

Share Print 23 February 2026 # Introduction18 June 2026 **On this page** The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption. The **AI transparency statement** explains how AI is used. # Strategic position on AI adoption The PBO’s strategic position on AI adoption sets a clear, organisation-wide approach to how we use AI to support our work. It reflects our role in a high‑trust parliamentary environment, balancing the opportunities of AI with the need to maintain quality, confidentiality and accountability.  # AI transparency statement The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) is committed to the responsibl … r when significant changes to the use or governance of AI use occur. ## AI Adoption and Use The PBO believe that as with any technology, AI … use of AI and the implementation of the shared responsibility model. ## AI Safety and Monitoring The PBO have implemented controls to manag … ouraged to raise issues directly with DPS IT and DPS Cyber Security. ## Contact For further information about the adoption of artificial in …

… primary focus is on workplace productivity to facilitate communication such as, document summarisation and content creation. - Domains: our AI applic …

… Gilmartin_](https://www.directory.gov.au/people/tom-gilmartin). The CTOAI Branch Manager has primary responsibility for the following areas of the AI policy: … commendations on submitted applications to a human decision maker:** - By leveraging AI for a part of the evaluation process for Digital Marketplace Panel 2 applications. The use of AI followed the Australian Government AI assurance framework and was implemented with external probity, privacy and technical advice. - By leveraging AI to support the assessment process, the DTA can enha … ecember 2025 | - Update stating Copilot and AI DMP2 are now in use. 17 June 2026 | - Revised and updated to align with current AI Transparency Statement requirements. - Updated Accountable Official details. - Included reference to the use of AI in DMP2 evaluation process. For further information or enquiries about the DTA’s adoption of artif …

### On this page ### The Administrative Review Tribunal (The Tribunal) is committed to iden … ising AI services for the purposes of undertaking its [review decision -making function](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00040/latest/tex … ses of making operational decisions. - Where the Tribunal does use, or, intends to use, AI in the domains of service delivery, corporate and enabling service … use in the Tribunal #### Current services (meeting the definition) **External facing:** The Tribunal provides ReadSpeaker and Google Translate services for users of our website. ReadSpeaker and Google Translate services for Tribunal website users do not requireoperate without Tribunal staff to operate. involvement. No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of the services provided. If users have trouble accessing information or services via the websit … istance by email, phone or by visiting one of our offices in person. **Internal facing:** The Tribunal is running a coordinated trial of premium Microsoft Copilot features for Tribunal staff. The trial supports staff to build capability, improve understanding of risks and controls, and identify potential use cases within existing security and privacy guardrails. In addition, the Tribunal is piloting other secure Microsoft AI products to support back-office tasks, including software development and cyber security automation. All AI usage that has access to Tribunal data is within our controlled technical environment. Access to and use of Public AI is prohibited. #### Services in review or development Intended future use of AI will … ll be added to this statement if utilised. - **Analytics for insights:** - For example, forecasting future demand trends for Tribunal services. - **Workplace productivity (corporate and enabling functions):** - For example, fast query engagement to controlled internal policy docu … - **Compliance and Fraud Detection (corporate and enabling functions):** - For example, analysing large internal service logs for performance im … use of AI. #### Training and assistance The Tribunal has developed "safe use of AIAI in Government: Unlocking Innovation with Accountability" training which is mandatory for staff, contractors and consultants. The Tribunal Enterprise Technology Group (ETG) is available to assist staff and members with responsible AI use. Regular advice is provided to members and staff on the limits of AI us … effectiveness and negative impacts #### Governance - The Tribunal’s aAccountable oOfficial under the policy is the Chief Information Officer (CIO). - The … Management Committee and Principal Registrar/CEO under the Tribunal’s normative governance framework, and any use of AI services must be approved through this mechanism. - … - The Senior Management Committee is actively involved when reviewing any and all potential uses for AI services. #### Compliance with applicable legis … make any significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. The following table sets out an overview of our compliance with the mandatory requirements of the DTA policy: Mandatory requirement| Status| Comments| Due date\ ---|---|---|---\ **AI transparency statement**| Compliant| N/A| N/A\ **Strategic position on AI adoption**| Compliant| We have developed and communicated our strategic position on AI adoption.| N/A\ **Accountable officials**| Compliant| We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official.| N/A\ **Accountable use case owners**| In development| Accountable use case owners are designated for each AI use case. We are documenting a process to assess and implement AI use cases with accountable owners. | 1 December 2026\ **Internal AI use case register**| In development| We have established a team to lead AI initiatives and to build out relevant use cases for the Tribunal.| 1 December 2026\ **Operationalise the responsible use of AI**| In development| We are developing supporting frameworks, strategies and processes to embed responsible AI practices in the Tribunal.| 1 December 2026\ **Staff training on AI**| Compliant| We require staff to complete mandatory AI training, including the AI in Government Fundamentals course. We also encourage further learning through programs offered by the Australian Public Service Commission and the Digital Transformation Agency.| N/A\ **Assessment of AI use cases and subsequent treatment**| Compliant| We have established a team to lead AI initiatives and to develop relevant use cases for the Tribunal, Ongoing assessment of AI use cases will be conducted by this team.| N/A ### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further info …

# APRA's AI Transparency Statement In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy f … es. (DTA domains of Corporate and Enabling, and Workplace Productivity \*). \*Please see [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digi … terns related to AI in agencies. ### Monitoring and Governance #### **Accountable Officials:** APRA has designated a panel consisting of the Executive Director – T … governed, is safe and that risks are identified and addressed. #### **Training and assistance:** All staff must complete mandatory training on the appropriate use of … ns or issues. APRA has adopted Copilot as its preferred AI tool. ### **Compliance with Legislation and Regulations** APRA ensures AI usage complies with Australian legislation, such as … ian Government's Policy for responsible use of AI in government. ### **Statement Review and Updates** This statement will be updated as and when APRA’s approach to AI cha … fect the statement’s accuracy, and at least every twelve months. ### **Contact Information** For inquiries about APRA's AI use, please email: [aiao@apra.gov.au](mailto:aiao@apra.gov.au). [ Previous page: Disclaimer ](https://www.apra.gov.au/disclaimer) [ Next page: Privacy ](https://www.apra.gov.au/privacy) #### Subscribe for updates To receive media releases, publications, speeches and other industry-related information by email [Subscribe](https://www.apra.gov.au/newsletter-signup)## Footnotes

… %20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at Treasurythe AOFM. **AI Adoption** The AOFM receives information and communication te … enhance our operational efficiency. **Public Interaction with AI** The AOFM does not use AI in ways that thaAI is not used in decision-making or service delivery, does not directly impact members of the public, and does not involve direct interaction with the public, and decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at the AOFM has human oversight. **Governance of AI** AppropriateGovernance of AI at the AOFM is integrated into existing management, risk and information governance arrangements have been estabincluding a specialished to support AI within the AOFMAI focus group. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundame … e of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). **AI Safety and Risk Management** The AOFM applies a proportionate approach to managing risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence. Current controls include: - restricting AI use to approved tools within the Treasury ICT environment - prohibiting the entry of sensitive, classified or market‑sensitive information into public AI tools - maintaining human oversight of all AI‑assisted outputs, and - aligning AI use with existing governance frameworks, including information security, privacy, records management and APS Values As AI use evolves, the AOFM will continue to assess and manage risks associated with accuracy, bias, data handling and appropriate use, and will adapt controls as needed to ensure safe and responsible use. **Monitoring and Evaluation** The AOFM monitors the use of AI within the agency to assess its effectiveness and ensure it remains appropriate and aligned with policy requirements. Current monitoring activities include: - initial cost, risk and benefit assessments of AI use cases and tools across the agency - oversight through existing governance forums and management structures - monitoring developments in whole-of-government policy and guidance Given the current limited and low-risk use of AI, performance measurement frameworks are basic. As AI adoption increases, the AOFM will strengthen monitoring and evaluation arrangements to assess effectiveness, benefits and risks on an ongoing basis. The AOFM maintains visibility of AI use through internal oversight and reporting mechanisms appropriate to its scale and level of adoption. **Update Frequency** AOFM’s transparency statement is reviewed and up … or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on 28 February12 June 2026 For further enquiries, please contact the AOFM at [enquiries@aofm.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@aofm.gov.au).

… ernment_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20gGovernment%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI in the Australian Public Serviceartificial intelligence (AI) for the benefit of Australians while ensuring its safe, ethical and responsible use, in line with community expectations. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) adheres to this policy supporting its principles uander the "enable, engage, and evolve" framework. We will be transparent in our internal use of AI technology as we explore, evaluate and adopt AI technology to benefit our work and our stakeholders. Currently, ACMA does requirements to enable a forward-leaning approach to agency adoption. We are committed to building AI capabilities and exploring how we use AI to strengthen the quality, efficiency and integrity of our regulatory functions while maintaining public trust. We use AI in a safe and responsible manner to support, but never replace, the professional judgement of staff, with clear human oversight and accountability for decisions and advice remaining with ACMA staff. ### AI definition In considering AI, we have adopted the OECD definition of AI, as outlined in the policy: “An AI system is a machine‑based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.” ### Why the ACMA uses, or considers using, AI The ACMA uses, and is considering further use of, AI to support efficient, lawful and evidence-informed regulation. AI may help staff manage information, analyse data, improve internal workflows and test or improve digital systems. The ACMA’s use of AI is intended to support staff judgement, not replan to use AI in services that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by. If this ce human responsibility for regulatory decisions. The main reasons the ACMA is exploring or using AI are to: - improve the speed and consistency of internal analysis, research and document handling - support data management, data quality checking and insight generation - assist software development, debugging, testing and quality assurance for ACMA systems - help staff summarise, search anges, we will update this statement to detail our use of AI. ### AI use We may employ AI across various corporate and enabling functions, including software engineering, data analytics and workplace productivity. #### Software engineering ACMA uses AI to assist in software development, debugging and testing when developing digital and data solutions and administering ACMA systems. Some of these systems are accessed by the public, but all systems are tested byd organise large volumes of internal information - improve workplace productivity while maintaining privacy, security, confidentiality and integrity - strengthen ACMA’s ability to understand technological change, including the use of AI, in the communications and media sectors it regulates ### How we use AI In line with the Australian Government [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), we use and consider AI across our active domain in the following usage patterns. ### Usage patterns\*\*\*\* #### Workplace productivity We are currently using generative AI to improve workplace productivity for staff including: - helping answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies - summarising and transcribing meetings - summarising, editing or refining documents, emails, instant messages and other content - assist in the analysis to obtain insights from datasets, including identifying patterns and trends - image processing and generation #### Decision making and administrative action ACMA uses AI to support decision making and administrative activities, not to make final decisions without human involvement. This includes using AI to assist with software development, debugging and testing when developing and administering digital and data systems. These uses support staff productivity within IT and enabling functions. All usage is subject to humans to ensure they behave as expected before they are releasedesting and review before release, including where systems may be accessed by the public. #### Data aAnalytics for insights ACMA sees benefits in using AI to assist with data and insights in t … o regulation, policy and informing advice to government on legislation. #### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI to improve workplace productivity for staff including: - helping answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies and entitlements - summarising documents, emails, instant messages and o and regulation. ### Monitoring and governing AI use ACMA manages risks associated with AI use through the following measures: - AI tools and use cases are assessed for risks, including security, privacy and suitability, before approval. An internal AI policy sets requirements for responsible, ethical and secure use, including safeguards to protect the privacy, confidentiality and integrity of agency data and operations. - Approved AI uses are monitored to ensure thery content - summarising and transcribing meetings ### Monitoring and governing AI use The ACMA has developed an overarching agency approach to AI and has established an AI Steering Committee to assess the opportunities and risks in using AI within ACMA. The Steering Committee considers AI use case benefits, risks, and guidelines as well as continue to operate as intended and remain appropriate over time, including periodic review of performance and unintended impacts. - AI is used to support, not replace, professional judgement, with decisions and advice remaining the responsibility of ACMA staff. - AI use is overseen through established governance arrangements. Where issues or increased risks are identified, outputs are reviewed by staff and escalated, and ACMA can restrict, pause or stop the use of an AI system. - ACMA requires staff to complete mandatory training on the responsible use of AI, with additional guidance and trainuing to raise staff awareness of AI. An internal AI policy ensures responsible, ethical, and secure usage of AI tools while safeguarding the privacy, confidentiality, and integrfor staff involved in AI‑enabled systems. ### Future AI use intentions ACMA may explore additional uses of AI where it supports our regulatory, corporate or operational functions and aligns wityh of agency data and operations. Under the policy, generative AI tools must not be used unless specifically approved under a robust approval, assurance and evaluation process and staff have undertaken AI training. The AI Steering Committee undertakes regular review of AI projects and solutions that are of medium to high risk to ensure compliance with theur legal obligations, risk appetite and public trust responsibilities. ACMA will take advantage of evolutionary whole of government AI initiatives such as GovAI. Any future use of AI will be subject to appropriate governance, risk assessment and human oversight. ### Compliance and accountability ACMA’s use of AI is governed through clear accountability and oversight arrangements: - Our approach is supported by an AI Steering Committee that oversees AI adoption, considers proposed use cases, and assesses associated risks and alignment with Australian Government policy and AI ethical principles. ### Accountable official The Chief Information and Digital Officer i- We appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) in February 2026 to lead AI adoption across the agency, champion strategic change and accelerate consistent and collaborative AI capability development across the APS. - ACMA has designated as the an AI Accountable oOfficial. ### AI transparency statement This AI transparency statement was las to oversee implementation of the Australian Government Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and ensure appropriate governance, compliance and assurance arrangements are in place. We will not use AI in ways that areviewed in February 2026. This statement will be reviewed at least annuall inconsistent with our legal obligations, public trust responsibilities, or Australian Government policy. AI will not make final regulatory decisions or enforcement decisions without accountable human judgment. ### Transparency ACMA will use AI where it helps us do our work better, safely and lawfully. We will use AI to support our regulatory, cor porate any time where a significant change is made to our or the Government’s approach to AId operational functions where it improves efficiency, supports better analysis, or reduces manual work. ACMA will consult with staff and their representatives when considering AI uses that may materially affect work practices, roles or responsibilities. ACMA does not currently deploy AI in direct interactions with the public. ### Contact For questions about this statement or further information on our use of AI, please contact [info@acma.gov.au](mailto:info@acma.gov.au). [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)

… nt The Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (OIGIS) does not presently engage with the use ofuse artificial intelligence (AI) in performing our work. Our intent is tooversight work. In line with our intent to explore options for the use of AI, the IGIS has commence tod explore theing a range of possibilities of its use within the Office in 20256 to drive innovation, improve corporate efficiency and support our wor … 0Transparency%20Statement.pdf). ##### Monitoring and Accountability OIGIS has appointed the Executive Director, Enterprise Management UniAssistant Inspector-General, Agency Oversight as OIGIS’ Chief AI Officer. As OIGIS explores the future use of AI in its work, OIGIS will develop and implement theis adopting appropriate frameworks to provide robust monitoring and evaluation me … ness and compliance with all government policies and requirements. As OIGIS further explores the use of AI, particular attention will be paid … agency, with national security considerations and limited resourcing, OIGIS has not yet commenced using any form of AIe of AI for core business activities. At present, the IGIS has begun limited testing and evaluation of AI for corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions. As the OIGIS’ network is part of our MOU arrangement with our Portfolio Department we are reliant on, the IGIS has approved use of one AI tools available on that platform. As such, we continue to participate in discussions and forums with our Portfolio Department on the use of AI. ##### Usage Patterns OIGIS does not currently employ the use of AI. As part of our initial considerations, we anticipate that if AI is used for core business activities. IGIS staff have begun limited test and evaluation of AI for corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions. This test and evaluation is logged in centralised documentation. The IGIS expects that if AI is integrated into core business activities, final decisions will still be made by a human to validate the outcome … and efficiencies that can be gained using AI in corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions which might optimise our small corporate resource allocation to improve simple administrative processes where possible. OIGIS’ use of AI will be contingent on assessment of the utility of the technology and availability on the platforms we intend toapproved for use which are supplied by our Portfolio Department. ##### Ensuring Responsible Use Once OIGIS decides to proceed with any form of AI technology, and prior to deployment, we will ensure all staff who will use the technology willWhilst IGIS has not yet commenced use of AI for core business activities, all IGIS staff have received appropriate training, and that there will bfoundational training on AI use. Prior to any use of AI for business activities, the IGIS will finalise an appropriate usage framework; with an OIGIS use of AI policy in place that aligns with Whole of Government re …

… meeting support, and drafting and summarising routine material). ## **Planned AI work** In February 2026, the ALRC established aCurrent trials and pilot use of AI We are trialling the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to support ALRC staff to working group to assess broader AI use, including potential trials for inquiry-adjacent tasks such as submission analysis support, proofing and document handling (subject to governance and approval). The group is also considering legal-specific tools (for example, L more effectively and to assist with our responsibilities in a controlled and low‑risk way. This pilot is governed by an internal framework that sets out approved tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot for productivity and operational efficiency and selected legal AI tools — LexisNexisN Lexis+ AI+ and Westlaw Edge) for possible future legal research support, noting the with Protégé and Thomson Reuters Westlaw Precision Australia with AI‑Assisted Research — to support legal research, analysis and synthesis. In this pilot, AI may be used tools are not currently use: - support operational efficiencies, such as calendar and email management - summarise and for inquiry work. We have internal guidance and a SharePoint page on the use of AI tools. Staff are required to confirm and acknowledge theganise information from approved documents and materials - prepare meeting notes, transcripts, summaries and action items - assist with internal planning, coordination and other operational tasks - help draft and refine internal and / or non-sensitive content and routine correspondence - support legal research, drafting and analysis including by: - identifying potentially are familiar with this guidance before accessing AI tools. Our guidance reminds staff to verify AI-generated content and to avoid sharing or copylevant cases, legislation and other sources - identifying themes, issues and patterns in academic, consultation or submission material - summarising legal materials - comparing approaches across jurisdictions - checking whether sources support a stated proposition - assisting with editing, proof reading and spelling and grammar checking legal and policy work. AI is not being trialled to produce substantive ALRC work from scratch – it is not being usensitive material into AI tools, consistend in legal reasoning, to substitute independent analysis, or to produce inquiry findings or recommendations. AI supports staff, but with relevant Australian Government security and privacy requirem does not replace human judgement. All AI outputs are reviewed, verified against source material, and refined before use. ALRC staff remain accountable for all decisions and final contents. ## **AI safety and governance** Within the ALRC, all AI use cases …

… de-resilience-service) for the latest updates and support available. ## Introduction Austrade is committed to transparency in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This statement outlines how we responsibly implement AI in line with government policy. ## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition of AI in line with the p[Policy for “Rthe responsible Uuse of AI in Ggovernment”](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) developed by the Digital Transformation Agency. The definition state … y in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”_ ## How Austrade uses AI Austrade does not currently use AI on a wide scale. The only approved tools in use currently include the Microsoft 365 CoPilot virtual assistant - this tool is currently being trialled by a limited number of users; and some machine learning models which use trade data to identify new export opportunities and potential markets for Australian exporters. Austrade is interested in understand’s approach to AI adoption and use Austrade is adopting AI to strengthen internal productivity, improve how we analyse data to support decision-making and modernise ways of working. We use AI to support agency objectives and align with whole-of-government digital and AI policy, while endeavouring to ensure AI is implemented in a safe and transparent manner appropriate for the Australian Government. Austrade is committed to demonstrating, encouraging and supporting the safe and responsible adoption of AI within the Australian Public Service. ### How Austrade uses AI Austrade is using AI for workplace productivity and analytics for insights. These complement service delivery and corporate enabling activities. Austrade participated in the Australian Government’s trials for Microsoft 365 Copilot. Austrade has since made Copilot available to all staff. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, Austrade staff are required to complete AI Foundations training on the potential application and usage of other AI tools across our functions and to do this we will continue to undertake active research and testing with AI technologies. Austrade is also engaging in the Government’s AI CoLab Alliance, supported by the APS Capability Reinvestment Fund. When Austrade approves solutions for use, this transparency statement will be updated accresponsible and ethical use of generative AI, regardless of their role. We also have a policy on the use of AI tools, which staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing generative AI tools online. The policy and training empowers staff to: - Be personally accountable for the use of AI outputs including the ability to explain and justify any advice or decisions based on those outputs. - Review and verify all AI outputs in full including for potential biases and discrimination against any individual or group. - Be transparent and disclose when AI is used in material for clients, partners or the public. - Restrict the entry of sensitive or classified information, including sensitive client or personally identifiable information into publicly available AI tools. Austrade uses tools with AI features to support monitoring of publicly available digital channels and social media. At this time, we are not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without human review. ## Classification of AI system use cases Austrade is exploring the application of AI technologies across its operations. This includes research and testing of various AI tools to understand their potential in suppordtingly. Austrade maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns:** supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff strategic outcomes. AI use cases are documented in an internal register to monitor their development and status. For AI applications that are being assessed, we use a structured approach to track progress and evaluate outcomes. Austrade currently uses AI in the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) as defined by the [Standard for AI Transparency Statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai-transparency-statements). Austrade is committed to complying with whole of government requirements applicable to AI. ### Usage patterns: - Workplace productivity - Austrade is strengthening workplace productivity and team collaboration with Copilot, a generative AI tool. Copilot automates repetitive tasks, summarises documents, generates draft emails and reports, and assists with data analysis. This enables staff to focus on more complex work and reduces time spent on manual processes. - Analytics for insights - Austrade leverages tools with AI features to monitor public digital chan focus on more complex work. - **nels and social media, to quickly identify valuable information and automate reporting. These tools improve efficiency in gathering insights and support evidence-based decision-making. ### Domains:** - Corporate and Enabling – - Supporting our corporate functions, including HR, finance, media and … s, optimising resource allocation and improving operational efficiency - Service delivery - AI supports staff in delivering trade and investment services to make their work more efficient. This enhances service quality and responsiveness to client needs. ## Monitoring and Governance ### Accountable Officials The Head of Digital Products and Platforms (HoDPP), is the designated Accountable Official (AO) for all AI matters, with oversight by the Chief Information and Digital Officer (CIDO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO). They are responsible for Austrade's implementation of the whole-of-government Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government. They are also AO is responsible for ensuring the following: - AI is implemented safely and responsibly. - AI is only used under human supervision. - TheDeployed AI systems and outputs of AI models are monitored for effectiveness. - AI use complies with all relevant legislation and regulation regarding Privacy and AI. - AI use cases are assessed for potential negative impacts. Any proposed AI solutions must be reviewed and considered by Austrade’s Digital and Technology Steering CommitteeAI Working Group and adhere to Australia’s [AI Ethics Principles. A security risk management plan needs to be developed for any potential AI tool put forward for use, as](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). For each AI tool, a security risk management plan and system authorisation is required prior to deployment. As AI technologies continue to evolve, Austrade weill as an ethics assessment. As our AI maturity increases, we will continue to evolve our governance processes and ensure that our staff are trained in how to use AI safely and ethically.maintain and strengthen its governance processes, ensuring that all staff are trained to use AI safely, both now and for any future technologies. ### Updates to this Statement Update publication date| Description\ ---|---\ 18/02/2025| AI Transparency Statement approved and published\ 02/06/2026| Updated to reflect Austrade’s current state on AI adoption\ Brings Austrade up to date with DTA’s Standard for AI transparency statements 2.0 For further enquiries please visit our [Contact us](https://www.austrade.gov.au/en/contact-us) page. ## Footer content arrow_upward

Scroll down to access downloads and media. ## Downloads ### Artificial intelligence transparency ## Our approach to using AI The Office of the Inspector-General of Aged Care (OIGAC) follows the Australian Government’s [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). We take a cautious and proportionate approach to the use of artificial intelligence (AI). AI is used only to support low-risk, internal activities and does not replace human judgement. ## Why we use AI Where appropriate, we may use AI to support internal workplace productivity and administratement [ Download [Publication] Artificial intelligence (AI) transparency statement (PDF) as PDF - 218 KB - 2 pages ](https://www.igac.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-02/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement.pdf) [ Download [Publication] Artificial intelligence (AI) transparency statement (Word) as Word - 214 KB - 2 pages ive efficiency. AI is not used to make decisions, exercise powers, or determine outcomes. ## How we currently use AI Our current use of AI is limited and internal. We use AI to support internal administrative activities, such as transcribing voicemail submissions. Original audio recordings are retained, and transcripts are reviewed by staff for accuracy before use. We are also beginning to use AI to assist some staff with background research activities supporting the development of projects outlined in our [Annual Work Plan](https://www.igac.gov.au/what-we-do/annual-work-plans "Annual work plans"). This use is limited to identifying and summarising publicly available information and internal materials to support early research and scoping. AI does not determine project selection, priorities, or outcomes. All planning and decision‑making remains the responsibility of our staff. Our use of AI is confined to assistive, internal productivity purposes within corporate and enabling services. There is no direct public interaction with AI, and AI outputs are not relied on without human review and oversight Our AI use is classified under the DTA's AI taxonomy as workplace productivity, within the corporate and enabling services domain. ## Human oversight and safeguards All AI outputs we use are subject to human review. We do not use automated decision‑making or recommendation systems. ## Monitoring and risk management Given the limited and low‑risk nature of AI use, we monitor AI through existing executive oversight and information and communication technology (ICT) controls. This statement is reviewed and updated annually, or when our AI use changes materially. ## Compliance with policy and law Our use of AI complies with the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digacital.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-02/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement.docx) Publication type: Notice Publication date: 28 February 2025 Language: English Tags: - About us - What we do - IGAC activityai/ai-in-government-policy) and applicable Commonwealth legislation, including privacy and information security requirements. Our ICT services are provided through the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, and our AI use operates within that environment and its policies. ## Governance and accountability The Inspector‑General of Aged Care is our Accountable Official for AI. Last updated: 1 May 2026 Tags: - About us

# WGEA\_\_ # AI transparency statement 18 May 2026 [Publication](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4630) [All industries](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4406) [Reporting](https://www.wgea.gov.au/terms/reporting) [For everyone](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4636) In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for rthe Responsible uUse of AI in gGovernment, the following information provides the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s (WGEA) statement on Artifificial Intelligence (AI) Ttransparency. Consistent with Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Governmentthis policy, an AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can inflfluence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Whereas automated systems ra, ranginge from traditional rules-based systems (for example a system which calculates a rate of payment in accordance with a formula set out in legislation) through to more specialised systems which use automated tools to predict and deliberate, including through the use of machine learning. ## Usage At this time, WGEA does not employ AI in service delivthrough to more advanced systems that use statistical or machine-learning techniques ## Usage WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and to support internal service delivery processes, including case management, in a controlled and human-centred mannery. AI is not use in compliance, auditing, d for statutory decision-making processes. WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corporate and enabling functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processes and automating routine tasks. Use tools like automated document summarisation and virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency, compliance determinations, auditing outcomes, or enforcement actions. AI is used internally to support staff in managing and responding to enquiries, including supporting staff in managing and responding to enquiries using approved information sources. All outputs are reviewed and approved by WGEA staff prior to use. AI outputs are advisory only and do not replace human judgement or decision-making. ## Public interaction and impact At this time, WGEA idoes not usinge AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be sigsystems to directly interact with members of the public or to make decisions that affect individuals without human involvement. All external communificantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. The WGEA is using AI in the domain of Corpotions are reviewed and issued by WGEA staff. AI is used only as an internal support capability and does not change WGEA’s accountability for the accuracy, quality, or appropriateness of information provided. ## Monitoring and accountability WGEA monitors the use of AI to ensure it operates and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivity. ## Monitorings intended and aligns with responsible AI principles. This includes monitoring usage levels, outcomes where AI assistance is not applied, and maintaining oversight through appropriate reporting mechanisms to support quality assurance and Accountabilityinuous improvement. The Chief Operating Officer was designated as the accountable official on 19 December 2024. As the accountable official, the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for ensuring the compliance of AI use in accordance with internal and external and is responsible for ensuring that AI use complies with relevant legislation, whole-of-government policiesy, and relevant regulations and legislation within the Agency. ## Responsible AI usage policy As part of the governance of AI use in the Agency, a responsible AI usage policy will be developed to ensureinternal governance arrangements. ## Responsible AI governance WGEA maintains appropriate governance and controls to ensure its use of AI alignments with the resourguidances provided by the Digital Transformation Agency. ## Contact Iinformation For ienquiries or feedback regarding WGEA’s use of AI, please contact us at : [wgea@wgea.gov.au](mailto:wgea@wgea.gov.au.) ## Review and Uupdates This AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 25 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.## More WGEA policies ### [ WGEA privacy policy ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/privacy-policy) ### [ Data management and governance ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/data-management-and-data-governance) ### [ Compliance strategy ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/WGEA-Compliance-Strategy)

… patterns as outlined by the DTA’s [_Classification system for AI use._ (PDF)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Sta …

… use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) wh. The polichy provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating … -statements). This page contains Treasury’s AI transparency statement and. It outlines progress against the outcomes in the [AI Plan for the Austra … rs%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## Key roles Treasury has designated the Chief Information Officer (CIO) as the Aappointed an accountable Oofficial for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the department. Accountable Oofficials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsi … ps://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) willhas been appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](http … Treasury’s current use of AI is classified as workplace productivity, with t. The aim over time is to leverage AI to enhance our operational efficiency. ## Public inter … ot use AI in ways that that involve direct interaction with the public, and d. Decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at Treasury has human oversight. ## Governance of AI AWe established appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within Treasury. TAll staff can access the Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff and. This course is mandatory under the APS AI plan. As a prerequisite to utilising Enterprise AI tools, sStaff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI before utilising Enterprise AI tools. Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations,. This includinges the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Secur … ive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure themake sure AI use is responsible and effective use of AI. The use of AI is governed by our: - Treasury's IT Acceptable Use Policy, - Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and - the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digi … or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on 28 February3 June 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Information Officer at [ISBCoord[ai@treasury.gov.au](mailto:ISBCoordai@treasury.gov.au?subject=AI%20transparency%20statement%20enquiry). Last updated 03 June 2026

… ation-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk OfficSecurity Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/ … tional-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Instrument of Appointment Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/instrument-of-appointment-chief-artificial-intelligence-officer) - [ Plans, policies and procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-t …

… ing emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), to enhance secure business outcomes. We embrace new opportunities while recognising the uncertainties and risks that come with technological change. This public transparency statement outlines DFAT’s approach to AIsupport staff in their delivery of outcomes in the national interest. Safe and responsible use of AI is a guiding principle for AI use in … h relevant legislation, regulations, guidance, and apply best practice where applicable. ## Our approach to AI DFAT uses both automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to strengthen our operations and deliver better outcomes. We follow the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and De … in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). At DFAT, "AI" refers to applications of machine learning, deep learning, and genera … overing every stage from initial idea to implementation. Our processes: - ensure: - AI is implemented and used safely and responsibly - continuously monitoring how AI performs - meeting all legal and regulatory obligations - identifying risks and potential negative impacts - support taking action to reduce or prevent harm. Each AI use case is assigne … always maintaining human oversight (‘Human-in-the-Loop’). All staff using AI must complete training on the responsible use of AI before they are granted access. Staff are encouraged to raise questions or report concerns through a dedicated internal channel. Currently, the Chief Information Officer is responsible for ensuring DFAT compliesDFAT has appointed a Chief AI Officer and an AI Accountable Officer, in accordance with whole- of- government AI policies and maintains the quality and integrity of departmental datarequirements. This transparency statement will be updated as our approach evolves … icy) (ver. 1.1), responsible use of AI in government 3 December 2025| - Transparency statement update\ 3 June 2026| Transparency statement updated to reflect appointment of a Chief AI Officer

… ated with a 4-year strategy and governance framework in 2025 _–_ 26. pdf 572.52 KBdownload pdf [ Data strategy 2024–25 [pdf, 572.52 KB] ](https://www.acma.gov.au/s …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaLearn](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest medialearn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical refleases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questionction, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for feedback for us?MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Board of Old Parliament HouseMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies anmedia) Find our latest media releases, download poublicies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Careerontact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.ontact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **28 day1 months ago**

… ectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plan4-10/moad-front-steps-and-entry.jpg.webp?h=74f1a18f&itok=uWRvqIpp) ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and rep/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about wortking at MoAD.   ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike3-03/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [AboutBoard of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingThe Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.

… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **268 days ago**

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and plansAbout Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament Houseold-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Mediap](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Getting here anliament-House-Tom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old pParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament Houseabout/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.

… n Public Service Academy’s _AI in Government Fundamentals_ course by 31 May0 June 20256. ### Public interaction and impact The AIC does not propose to use …

… ssets/git_bridge/0012/12063/mysource_files/icon-minus-white.svg) - [ OAIC annual reportsAccountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reportsaccountability)  - [ Annual report 2024-25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2024-25) - [ Annual report 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202324) - [ Annual report 2022-23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2022-23) - [ Annual reportdvertising ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/advertising) - [ Gifts and benefits register ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [ Government contracts ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/government-contracts) - [ Grants and appointments ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/grants-and-appointments) - [ Indexed list of files ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/indexed-list-of-files) - [ Legal services expenditure ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/legal-services-expenditure) - [ Public interest disclosures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/public-interest-disclosures) - [ Reporting fraud and corruption at the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/reporting-fraud-and-corruption-at-the-oaic) - [ Annual Statement of Compliance with the Commonwealth Child Safe Framework 2025 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/annual-statement-of-compliance-with-the-commonwealth-child-safe-framework) - [ Corporate plans ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans)   - [ Corporate plan 20215–226 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202122) - [ Annual reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-2025-26) - [ Corporate plan 2024–25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2024-25) - [ Corporate plan 20203–214 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-202324) - [ Corporate plan 2022–23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021223) - [ Annual reportCorporate plan 20219–202 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201920) - [ Annual report 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-202122) - [ Corporate plan 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021) - [ Corporate plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201920) - [ Corporate plan 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201819) - [ Digital health annual reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/ … n-commissioners-activities-in-relation-to-digital-health-201819) - [ Corporate plansMemorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plansmemorandums-of-understanding)  - [ Corporate plan 2025–26 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2025-26) - [ Corporate plan 2024–25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2024-25) - [ Corporate plan 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202324) - [ Corporate plan 2022–23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202223) - [ Corporate plan 2021–22 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202122) - [ Corporate plan 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021) - [ Corporate plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201920) - [ Corporate plan 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201819) - [ Plans, policies and procedureurrent memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/current-memorandums-of-understanding) - [ Memorandum of understanding reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/memorandum-of-understanding-reports) - [ Other agreements ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/other-agreements) - [ OAIC annual reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedureoaic-annual-reports)  - [ Procedures for Managing Suspected Breaches of the APS Code of Conduct ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/breaches-of-the-aps-code-of-conduct-procedures) - [ Data breach response planAnnual report 2024-25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/data-breachoaic-annual-response-plan) - [ OAIC Emissions reduction plan 2024–2026 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-emissions-reduction-planrts/annual-report-2024-20265) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractorsAnnual report 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors – overarching policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors-overarching-policy) - [ Gifts and benefits policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/gifts-and-benefits-policy) - [ Human resources privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/human-resources-privacy-policy) - [ Information Publication Scheme agency plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [ Multicultural access and equity plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/multicultural-access-and-equity-plan-201920) - [ OAIC asset management policy and guidelines ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-asset-management-policy-and-guidelines) - [ OAIC service charter ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-service-charter) - [ Operational policy and process: publication of submissions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/operational-policy-and-process-publication-of-submissions) - [ Privacy complaints about the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-complaints-about-the-oaic) - [ Privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy) - [ Privacy policy summary ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy-summary) - [ Public interest disclosure procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/public-interest-disclosure-procedures) - [ Procurement judicial review policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/procurement-judicial-review-policy) - [ Privacy management plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-management-plan) - [ Communicating with the OAIC for members of the public ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public) - [ Operational information ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information)   - [ Accountable authority instructions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/accountable-authority-instructions) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-security-officerchief-risk-officer) - [ Budget ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/budget) - [ Delegation of freedom of information powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-freedom-of-information-powers-and-functions) - [ Delegation of privacy powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-privacy-powers-and-functions) - [ Employee census results ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/employee-census-results) - [ OAIC Audit Committee ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-audit-committee) - [ OAIC Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-enterprise-agreement-2024-2027) - [ OAIC Privacy Champion, Chief Privacy Officer and Privacy Officer roles ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-privacy-champion,-chief-privacy-officer-and-privacy-officer-roles) - [ Regulator expectations and intent ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability)   - [ Advertising ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/advertising) - [ Gifts and benefits register ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [ Government contracts ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/government-contracts) - [ Grants and appointments ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/grants-and-appointments) - [ Indexed list of files ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/indexed-list-of-files) - [ Legal services expenditure ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/legal-services-expenditure) - [ Public interest disclosures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/public-interest-disclosures) - [ Reporting fraud and corruption at the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/reporting-fraud-and-corruption-at-the-oaic) - [ Memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding)   - [ Current memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/current-memorandums-of-understanding) - [ Memorandum of understanding reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/memorandum-of-understanding-reports) - [ Other agreements ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/other-agreements) - [ Annual Statement of Compliance with the Commonwealth Child Safe Framework 2025 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/annual-statement-of-compliance-with-the-commonwealth-child-safe-framework) - [ OAIC AI transparency statement ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statementoaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202324) - [ Annual report 2022-23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2022-23) - [ Annual report 2021–22 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202122) - [ Annual report 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202021) - [ Annual report 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201920) - [ Annual report 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201819) - [ OAIC AI transparency statement ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) - [ Operational information ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information)   - [ Accountable authority instructions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/accountable-authority-instructions) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-security-officerchief-risk-officer) - [ Budget ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/budget) - [ Delegation of freedom of information powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-freedom-of-information-powers-and-functions) - [ Delegation of privacy powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-privacy-powers-and-functions) - [ Employee census results ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/employee-census-results) - [ OAIC Audit Committee ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-audit-committee) - [ OAIC Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-enterprise-agreement-2024-2027) - [ OAIC Privacy Champion, Chief Privacy Officer and Privacy Officer roles ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-privacy-champion,-chief-privacy-officer-and-privacy-officer-roles) - [ Regulator expectations and intent ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Plans, policies and procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures)   - [ Procedures for Managing Suspected Breaches of the APS Code of Conduct ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/breaches-of-the-aps-code-of-conduct-procedures) - [ Data breach response plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/data-breach-response-plan) - [ OAIC Emissions reduction plan 2024–2026 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-emissions-reduction-plan-2024-2026) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors – overarching policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors-overarching-policy) - [ Gifts and benefits policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/gifts-and-benefits-policy) - [ Human resources privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/human-resources-privacy-policy) - [ Information Publication Scheme agency plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [ Multicultural access and equity plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/multicultural-access-and-equity-plan-201920) - [ OAIC asset management policy and guidelines ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-asset-management-policy-and-guidelines) - [ OAIC service charter ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-service-charter) - [ Operational policy and process: publication of submissions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/operational-policy-and-process-publication-of-submissions) - [ Privacy complaints about the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-complaints-about-the-oaic) - [ Privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy) - [ Privacy policy summary ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy-summary) - [ Public interest disclosure procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/public-interest-disclosure-procedures) - [ Procurement judicial review policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/procurement-judicial-review-policy) - [ Privacy management plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-management-plan) - [ Communicating with the OAIC for members of the public ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public) - ## On this page # Our AI transparency statement \_\_ Published: …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans) JoFind our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)king-banner.png.webp?h=40144d9c&itok=exOuJbMy) ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.

… customer service charter outlines our commitment to our customers. [Our cCustomer promiseservice charter](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/customer-service-charter) # …

… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **226 days ago**

# Planning and priorities We set strategic plans and priorities to guide our work and the benefits we aim to deliver. ## On this page ## Corporate plan Our [corporate plan](https://www.acma … ated with a 4-year strategy and governance framework in 2025 _–_ 26. [  pdf 572.52 KB [ Data strategy 2024–25 [pdf, 572.52 KB] ](https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-03/Data%20strategy … oach to AI. [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)

… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Conditions of entryareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [About Old Parliament House3/Senate-Chamber-Old-Parliament-House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/abousupport/vold-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988unteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House. ![Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/sites/default/fil …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [VolunteerConditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here an3/Senate-Chamber-Old-Parliament-House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [About Old pParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingabout/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.

… fect from **28 April 2026** [Read the policy](https://www.arc.gov.au/news-and-publications/publications/policy-use-generative-artificial-intelligence-arcs-grants …

… on Officer is our AI Accountable Official for the NBA. For questions or concerns about this statement or the NBA’s use of AI, you can email [ai@blood.g …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by5/vh-banner.jpg.webp?h=35d1abc8&itok=2g_MnYG-) ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.   ### [VenueGetting hiere and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venuevisit/getting-hiere) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.

… gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-of-information) Corporate Customer service charter Our customer service charter outlines what o …

… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **202 days ago**

# AI transparency statement The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care’s (the Commission) commitment to the safe and responsible use of AI supports our purpose to contribute to better health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers, and improved value and sustainability in the health system by leading and coordinating national improvements in the safety and quality of health care. Last updated 5 March 2026 Print Share - Twitter - Facebook - Email The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. Along with the [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). ## Why we use AI To achieve our purpose to contribuShare Facebook X Email Print ### Go to section # Corporate governance Our corporate governance reflects the legislative requirements we have to handle data, privacy, freedom of information and other policies and procedures. ## Governance In 2011, the Federal Parliament passed the [National Health Reform Act 2011](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/nhra2011216/) (NHR Act) which established the Commission as a corporate Commonwealth entity under the [Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2013A00123) (PGPA Act). The Commission’s governance structure is determined by these Acts. The Commission is jointly funded by all governments on a cost sharing basis, and the Commission’s program of work is developed in consultation with the Australian, state and territory Health Ministers. The Commission works in partnership with patients, healthcare professionals, policy makers and healthcare organisations to achieve a sustainable, safe and high-quality health system. The Commission’s strategic priorities are in the areas of: - High-quality care in an evolving environment - Strong outcome-focused clinical governance - Empowered patients, carers and communities - An improvement-driven workforce culture The Commission’s planned activities are shaped by these four strategic priorities and align with the functions of the Commission set out in the NHR Act. The [Commission Board](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/our-board "Our Board"), appointed by the Minister for Health and Ageing, Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, is responsible for governing the Commission and meeting its functions and responsibilities under legislation. In undertaking its work, the Commission is supported by the Inter-Jurisdictional Committee, which is made up of senior safety and quality managers from the Australian Government Department of Health, Disability, and Ageing, and each state and territory. In addition, the Board has established sub-committees in the form of the Private Hospital Sector Committee and Primary Care Committee that provide a valuable connection with representatives from the private and public sectors. Program initiatives are informed by external advisory committees, working groups, public consultation and workshops. Major Commission proposals are forwarded to the Health Chief Executives Forum and the Health Ministers' Meeting. The Commission is situated in Sydney and is managed on a day-to-day basis by its [CEO, Conjoint Professor Anne Duggan](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are "Who we are"). ## Data governance The Commission has established a [Data Governance Framework](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-data-governance-framework "ACSQHC Data Governance Framework") and [Data Plan](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-data-plan-2025-28 "ACSQHC Data Plan 2025-28") to govern the use of data. The Commission’s Data Governance Framework specifies the obligations of the Commission with regard to data acquisition, maintenance, sharing/permissions, reporting and publication. The Data Governance Framework was developed in accordance with legislative requirements and formal agreements. ## Disclosure of Interests Policy The Commission has developed a [Disclosure of Interests Policy](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-disclosure-interests-policy "ACSQHC Disclosure of Interests Policy"). This policy assists in ensuring that the Commission complies with statutory obligations relating to disclosure of interests under the Commonwealth legislation by appropriately disclosing any material personal interests in a prescribed way. The Disclosure of Interests Policy applies to all employees, contractors and consultants who have duties related to the operations and functions of the Commission. The policy aims to: protect the integrity of the Commission; promote confidence in the work of the Commission; and to protect the reputation of the individuals and groups that contribute to the work of the Commission. The policy also provides a mechanism for individuals to disclose any and all interests that may conflict with the work of the Commission. If you have any questions regarding the Disclosure of Interests Policy, please contact us on 02 9126 3600 or [through email](mailto:mail@safetyandquality.gov.au). ## Freedom of Information (FOI) The purpose of the [Freedom of Information Act 1982](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/C2004A02562%5Ct_self) (FOI Act) is to give members of the public rights of access to information held by the Government of the Commonwealth and of its agencies. [View how to make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance/making-freedom-information-foi-request "Making a Freedom of Information (FOI) request") ## Privacy Impact Assessment Register Under section 15(1) of the [Privacy (Australian Government Agencies – Governance) APP Code 2017](https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2017L01396/asmade/text) (Privacy Code), the Commission is required to “maintain a register of the Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) it conducts. An agency must publish the register, or a version of the register, on its website”. Expand all 1 – Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Project Reference number| **1**\ ---|---\ Project name| **Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Project**\ Project description| The PaRIS survey is an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) initiative to promote people-centred health care, and its aim is to strengthen the measurement of patient-reported outcomes and experiences.The survey is focused on patients aged over 45 with one or more chronic condition in primary and ambulatory care. It includes both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and patient reported experience measures (PREMS). Examples of PROMS are ratings of peoples’ pain, physical functioning, and psychological well-being. Examples of PREMS are peoples’ experiences with healthcare, such as experienced waiting times and communication with healthcare providers. On top of the PROMS and PREMS, some background characteristics such as age, sex and the type of conditions will be collected to be used in data analysis.As well as a patient questionnaire, there will be a provider questionnaire to collect some practice and provider characteristics.The PaRIS Survey is being conducted by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission), on behalf of the on Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. The Commission has engaged ORIMA Research to assist with implementation of the survey Australia-wide.The PaRIS project has also been reviewed and approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC reference number - 0012023).The Privacy Impact Assessment for the project considers how personal information is collected, managed, and protected; an assessment of compliance with the Australian Privacy Principles; and recommendations to mitigate any privacy impacts.\ Project commencement date| April 2023\ Expected completion date| January 2024 2 – MedicineInsight Reference number| **2**\ ---|---\ Project name| MedicineInsight\ Project description| MedicineInsight is a national primary care data collection based on data extracted from the Clinical Information Software at participating General Practices. Data are deidentified and encrypted as part of the extraction process, and stored in a secure Australian based data warehouse.The data are subsequently used in three main ways: - Fed back to Practices and GPs enabling them to reflect on their prescribing patterns and patient care and review their practice results as well as the aggregate of all participating MedicineInsight practices as an ongoing Quality Improvement initiative - Used as an evidence base to inform policy and regulatory decisions by government departments, agencies, and subsidiaries (e.g. TGA, PBAC) - Made available to Australian based researchers as bespoke Data Extracts or aggregate data tables upon formal application for primary care research projects The collection of data from General Practices and the use of that data for research purposes have been reviewed and approved by the RACGP NREEC (Ref NREEC 23-171).A Privacy Impact Assessment for the program was undertaken in 2021 under the prior data custodian NPS MedicineWise. The program was transferred to the Commission in January 2023, and supplementary PIA advice was sought in 2025. These assessments examined how the collection manages and protects data in line with Australian legislation including the Privacy Act and Australian Privacy Principles, and provided recommendations to strengthen the integrity of the program. These recommendations have been or are being actioned as appropriate.\ Project commencement date| January 2023\ Expected completion date| Ongoing ## Privacy Policy The Commission is committed to the protection of personal information in accordance with the [Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text). The Commission aims to ensure that all personal information is managed in accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) contained in the Privacy Act. The Commission is also committed to ensuring that the statistical healthcare datasets accessed pursuant to our functions under the [National Health Reform Act 2011](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2011A00009/latest/text) and the National Health Reform Agreement is managed in a manner which is generally consistent with the APPs, as well as state and territory privacy laws and healthcare regulations. [View our privacy policy](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/privacy-policy "Privacy Policy") The most up to date versions of both the Privacy Act and [National Health Reform Act 2011](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2011A00009/latest/text) are available from [Comlaw](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/). The National Health Reform Agreement is available from [COAG](http://www.coag.gov.au/node/96). The Commission is also a signatory to the [National Health Information Agreement](https://meteor.aihw.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/182135). ### Information collected on this website When you visit our website, our server makes a record of your visit and logs the following non-identifiable information for statistical, quality improvement or systems administration purposes: - your server address - your top level domain name (for example .com, .gov, .au, .uk etc) - the date and time of your visit to the site - the pages you accessed and documents downloaded - the previous site you have visited - the type of browser you are using. No attempt will be made to identify individual users unless required under Australian law or a tribunal/court order. We collect no personal information about you unless you choose to take part in an activity that asks for personal information, such as subscribing to a newsletter, sending an email or participating in a survey. If you choose not to take part in these kinds of activities your ability to use the website won’t be affected. ### Hotjar and Google Analytics This website uses two web analytics services: Hotjar and Google Analytics. Hotjar may record mouse clicks, mouse movements and scrolling activity. Hotjar collects non-identifiable information regarding pages visited, actions which are taken, country of origin, device used, operating system, and browser used. Hotjar does not collect personally identifiable information that you do not voluntarily enter in this website. Hotjar does not track your browsing habits across web sites which do not use Hotjar services. Google Analytics uses cookies and JavaScript code to enable analysis on usage of this website. The data collected about your use of this website, (including your IP address) will be transmitted to and stored on Google's servers. Google will use this data for the purpose of compiling reports on website activity for us and providing other services relating to website activity and internet usage. Google will not collect personal information about you and the reports provided by Google to us will only contain aggregate non personal data about your use of this website (these reports may contain data relating to pages viewed, files downloaded or the completion of online subscriptions). Google may transfer this data to third parties where required to do so by law, or where third parties process this data on Google's behalf. Google will not associate your IP address with any personal information you may have previously provided to Google. You may refuse the use of cookies by selecting the appropriate settings on your browser. Please note that if you do this, you may not be able to fully use this website. By using this website, you consent to the processing of data about you by Hotjar and Google in the manner and for the purposes set out above. ## Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures The Commission has established its policy and procedures for dealing with Public Interest Disclosures. Disclosures can be directed to better health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers, an Authorised Officer, appointed under the [Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (PID Act)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00133/latest/text). The Commission's Chief Executive Officer has appointed the following staff members as the Commission's Authorised Officers: - [Chris Leahy, Chief Operating Officer](mailto:christopher.leahy@safetyandquality.gov.au) The PID Act prescribes a framework for the disclosure and investigation of wrongdoing and maladministration in the Australian Public Sector (APS). The Commission encourages and supports the reporting of wrongdoings in the APS so that they can be investigated and addressed. [View our Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/public-interest-disclosure-policy-and-procedures "Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures") ## AI transparency statement The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care’s (the Commission) commitsment to the safe and responsible adoption of AI to take advantage of the various benefits the technology provides. ## use of AI supports our purpose to contribute to better health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers, and improved value and sustainability in the health system by leading and coordinating national improvements in the safety and quality of health care. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [ _Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. Along with the [ _Standard for AI transparency statements_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [_Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). Expand all How we use AI The Commission uses Microsoft Copilot in a protected environment, for [ _generative_](https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/generative-ai.html) and narrow model AI in line with the DTA’s [ _Classification systems for use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) a … in include scientific, corporate and enabling and service delivery. ## Our approach with AI A human will assess all AI outputs to ensure acc … . This transparency statement will be revised this approach changes. ## Our commitment The Commission is committed to using AI in a responsib … - legislation - regulations - frameworks - policies - best practice. ## Safe and responsible AI adoption We will be transparent as we adopt r … nues to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology. ## Contact The Chief Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official … T@safetyandquality.gov.au](mailto:ACSQHCICT@safetyandquality.gov.au) Find more in our resource library [Governance](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library?f%5B0%5D=topics:42## Topics - [ About the Commission ](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/search?filter%5B0%5D=topics%3A94) [Was this information useful? ](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/webform/ajax/feedback?target_id=feedback-form-replace&page_path=/about-us/corporate-governance)

… ible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) **On this page** Transparency is critical to building public trust and is an important aim of the policy## Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Transparency is critical to building public trust and supports the Australian Government’s commitment to safe, responsible and ethe broader APS Reform agenda. Wical adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. At Sport Integrity Australia (SIA), we define AI as a family of technologies that can bring togethercombine: - computing power, - scalability, - networking, - connected devices and, - interfaces, and; - data. AI systems can be programmed to perform specific tasks such asto perform tasks that would normally require human intelligence. These tasks may include: - reasoning, - planning, - prediction, - natural language processing, - summarisation, - transcription, - computer vision, audio processing, interaction, prediction and more. nd; - decision support. SIA defers to the Digital Transformation Agency’s definition of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems can operate with varying levels of autonomy. We a as;\ ‘ _A machine-based system that for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, re committed to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful use when considering the adoption of AI capabilities. We will be transparent as we prepare, engage, adopt, monitor, review, evolve, integrate and pivot to changes in AI technology, to benefit staff and external stakeholders. ## How we use AI At this time we do not authorise the use of AI in any way thatendations, or decisions, that can influence physical or virtual environments_ ’. AI systems may operate with varying levels of autonomy. We are committed to ensuring that all AI capabilities are implemented in a manner that is lawful, ethical, secure, transparent and human-centred. ## How we use AI At this time, SIA has not yet deployed AI systems in ways where members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI without a human intermediary or intervention. We are testing the generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. The usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. ### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI toppropriate human oversight, review or intervention. We are currently rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat in controlled internal workplace productivity environments, consistent with Australian Government policy and security requirements. Our use of AI is aimed at improveing workplace productivity for all staff including: - helping answ. As a prer equestions from staff regarding workplace policies and entitlements - improving accessibiisite to using Copilot, SIA staff will be required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. We also are developing a politcy to help all staff use platforms, applications and services - improving the uptake of features in existing products and services - summarising documents, emails and other content - perfon the use of AI tools by staff, which staff will be required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing generative AI tools online. This internal training and internal policy will assist staff to: - not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without external verification - restrict the distribution of sensitive material to third parties, for example by copy-and-pasting sensitive content. We are explorming ta ranscription of interviews and meeting notes - preparing training mage of AI driven innovations and tools, to make sure we continuously improve our efficiency and effectiveness as a sport integrity agency. AI tools are currently limited to interinal for new and existing staff - In the future we are considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation “By 2030, the Australian Government will use data and digital technologies in innovative ways.” - See the [Adopting emerging technologies section](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-future#adopt-emerging-technologies) in the Data and Digital Government Strategy. #### We have processes to ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident,corporate and enabling functions and are not authorised to independently make decisions, provide official determinations, or replace human judgement in operational or public-facing services. ## Responsible AI safety and governance We are committed to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful uses of AI and ensuring appropriate governance throughout the lifecycle of AI adoption, including: - evaluation and procurement - implementation and testing - operational monitoring - risk management - security assurance - ongoing review and improvement. We are establishing an AI oversight committee that are responsible for the processes we have in place that ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - risks are identified, assessed and managed - AI systems remain subject to human oversight and accountability - stafe and responsible - ourf use AI safely, responsibly and in accordance with agency policy - AI usage is monitored and audited where appropriate - stakeholders can havemaintain trust in our use of AI - our risks are identified and addressed - our AI access and usage is monitored technologies. ## Public-facing AI use Currently, weSIA does not use AI in any services or advice we provide externally (publicly) or internally. If we do implement any AI capability, we will update this statement to outline our use, with a summary of: - the intentions behind why we uses AI or is considering its adoption - classification of AI use according to required outcomes and AI system or tool -systems to independently provide public services, make regulatory decisions, or deliver advice without human review and accountability mechanisms. If public-facing or higher-risk AI capabilities are introduced in future, this statement will be updated to provide transparency regarding: - the purpose and intended outcomes of the AI capability - the classification and risk profile of the AI use classification of use where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI without a human intermediary or intervention -e - whether members of the public interact directly with AI systems - governance and assurance measures to - monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes - compliance with applicable legislation and regulation - efforts to identify and protect the public against negative impacts - compliance with each requirement uing and evaluation arrangements - safeguards to minimise harm and unintended impacts - compliance with legislation, policy and Australian Government AI requirements. While AI may be used to help in various tasks, our people will continue to be responsible for oversight and decision making. ## Compliance with AI in Government Policy Under the : - [Policy for the rResponsible uUse of AI in gGovernment. ## Compliance - We will only utilise AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. #### Policy for the responsible use of AI in government - We comply with all mandatory requirements of the policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai-use-case-impact-assessment) (AI in government Policy) and the; - [Standards for AI transparency statements [PDF 282 KB]](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) We are required to report our compliance with the requirements under the policy. At time of publishing, this section is compliant with version 2.0 of the AI in government policy. The following table outlines the requirements of version 2.0 of the AI in government policy and the status of compliance with those requirements: #### Requirement | #### Status ---|---\ Accountable Official | Compliant\ AI Transparency Statement | Compliant ## Accountable official - The Deputy CEO was designated as the accountable official on 20 August 2024for AI governance on 20 August 2024 in accordance with Australian Government policy requirements. #### AI transparency statement This AI transparency statement was first published to our website in January 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. ## Contact us If you have any enquiries about this statement, we can be reached via email: [contactus@sportintegrity.gov.au](mailto:contactus@sportintegrity.gov.au)in May 2026. It will be reviewed and updated: - at least once a year - when a significant change is made to the agency’s approach to AI (including the complete roll out of CoPilot as described above) - when SIA becomes aware of any new factor that materially impacts the statement’s accuracy. #### Related information - [Governance](https://www.sportintegrity. …

28 February 2026 The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is dedicated …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingCollection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.5/vh-banner.jpg.webp?h=35d1abc8&itok=2g_MnYG-) ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?

… /media/Project/IPA/IPAustralia/PDF/Gender-Action-Plan-2025-27.pdf?rev=44ee236c30ac486a9930a1ceed0c3a54&hash=358791AC5B0A59EDC508217E1FA6106Bbef1d7df1a634d1fb44bc7bdd52ba80d&hash=019DDBD70901C5C486D75AC8E115913F). Download [ WGEA Employer Statement PDF | 267KB ](https://www.ipau … mers. [Our customer promise](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/our-customer-promiseservice-charter) ##### Cost recovery implementation statement Our cost recovery imp … Australia/PDF/ip-australia-rpf-self-assessment-report-2019-20.pdf?rev=9c89958593164a149866196ea4946b44a80fb5849a684b02b383833cef0deb2c) ##### Tenders and contracts #### Senate Order for entity contracts … ning_breaches_of_code_of_conduct_and_for_determining_sanction.pdf?rev=bf4973a69c014c4b8a80dccb326ad89c42e18675965e4d69be7eb4f2ba70e319) ## Related content Freedom of information You can request copies … gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-of-information) Our cCustomer promise As part of our commitment to creating a world-leading IP system, customers are the core of everything we do. Our customer promise outlines this commitmentservice charter Our customer service charter outlines what our customers can expect when interacting with us and how we aim to provide high levels of service. [Read more](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/our-customer-promiseservice-charter) Gift register Our agency heads and staff occasionally accept gifts …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans) JoFind our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed bystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **1920 days ago**

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Board of Old Parliament HouseCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?   ### [AboutTom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizensThe Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.

… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **149 days ago**

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofBoard of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Venue hireMap](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interv3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiews and film shoots.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.3-03/MoAD-Changemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ![About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/sites/default/f …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [PartnershipsVenue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [CareersMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careersmedia) JoFind our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.

… o be downloaded [here](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-025/OIGIS%20Use%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%28AI%29%20Transparenc …

… use of AI as we explore opportunities and implement AI capabilities. ThisOur commitment aligns with the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [policy for the responsible use of AI in government 2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and we are working towards meeting the obligations of the policy and the outcomes of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## How we use AI Geoscience Australia has long been engaged in the … abilities, within our work practices and scientific disciplines, focussinged on internal testing and exploration with no use cases being used on published products and services. **Use patterns and domains** Geoscience Australia is investigating and employing AI systems for Scientific. We are using AI, based on the [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) in government, for: - Usage patterns of analytics for insights, Cworporate and Enabling domains, and as a subset within each, the Skplace productivity, decision making and administrative action, and image processing. - Domains of service Ddelivery domain. _Scientific Research and Information_\ _Usage Patterns: Analytics for insights, Image processing, corporate and enabling, and scientific endeavours. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains: _Scientific_ The investigation and application of AI involve multiple scientific … e and improve access to Geoscience Australia’s scientific resources. Examples of oOur utilisation of AI includes tailored Machine Learning products made available to both internal and external stakeholders. Additionally, current investigations in support of Critical Minerals initiatives, current investigations are focused on building covariate libraries, large dataset analyses, … ng capabilities at the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI). _Work Process Improvement AI_\ _Usage Patterns: Decision making and administrative action, Workplace productivity_ We are enhancing workplace efficiency with the use of Generative AI (such as Microsoft CoPilot)Corporate and enabling_ Geoscience Australia endorsed AI products for staff use are Microsoft 365 Copilot, available as an Enterprise AI tool. Workplace productivity is being improved by automating administration tasks, improved services and accessing to information quickly through improved user experience, letting staff focus on core tasks. ## Compliance We will, letting staff focus on core tasks. ## AI governance We meet the current [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) due to date and developing appropriate governance arrangements aligned to our agency strategic direction and operations. Our aim is to utilise AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. ### Accountable officialKey roles In alignment with DTA’sthe [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), we have two accountable officials under the policy. These are the Chief Informationthe Chief Information Officer ([CIO](https://www.ga.gov.au/about/organisational-structure)) is our designated Accountable Official. A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) and the Chief Scientist represented by those within each [rolewill be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.gadigital.gov.au/about/organisational-structure)policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead our AI transformation. ### Authoritative source, individual responsibility and monitoring … o maintain the integrity and reliability of all systems, including AI. Staff are also required to complete mandatory training prior to using Enterprise AI tools. Generative AI can be useful for research, summarising information, o … ia is monitored through an AI register and assessed (when applicable) through multiple processes with a focus on business cases, security and efficiency. ### Reviews and more information The transparency statement will be reviewed at least every twelve months, or as our approach to AI changes. Statement update| Comment\ ---|---\ 20 February 2025 | Transparency statement released For more information or enquires about Geoscience Australia’s adoption of AI, you can [contact us](https://www.ga.gov.au/contact-us)for use case suitability, risks and security. Assessments consider the relevant governance, standards, procedures or guidance, either in part or full and where applicable, such as the [Artificial intelligence impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/a), [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-technical-standard), and [Guidance for AI proof of concept to scale](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-POC-to-scale). ### Reviews and more information The transparency statement will be reviewed at least every twelve months, or as our approach to AI changes. The most recent update was on 15th May 2026.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CPareertnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/abousupport/cparetners) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracyhips) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [PCartnershipeers](https://moadoph.gov.au/supporabout/pcartneerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old- Parliament- House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.

… ptions, visit the [Go Global Toolkit](https://export.business.gov.au/find-export-markets/middle-east-updates-and-supportreight-and-shipping/trade-resilience-service) for the latest updates and support available. ## How Austrade defin …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/mediacareers) FJoind our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament HouseChangemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Lear Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.   ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the loca0/moad-front-steps-and-entry.jpg.webp?h=74f1a18f&itok=uWRvqIpp) ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions -of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House6/Statement-Jack-Green%27s-paintings-exhibition-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.

… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **124 days ago**

… telligence (AI) by the OSI is in line with the AI policies of AGD and AFPthe AFP. ## **AI classification** In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency Standard for AI transparency statements, we classify our current and intended use of AI as follows: - Usage patterns: our primary focus is on workplace productivity to facilitate communication such as document summarisation and content creation. - Domains: our AI application is situated within the corporate and enabling domain, supporting internal functions like HR, finance, communication and IT. At this stage of adoption, the public does not directly interact with, nor is it significantly impacted by our AI systems or their outputs without human review. ## **Data privacy and security** Protecting the privacy and securi …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [VolunteerMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofabout/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)tatement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry appr … of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.

The Digital### Principles - The Australian Transfpormation Agency's [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI in the Australian Public Service. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) adheres to this policy supporting its principles unt Safety Bureau (ATSB) is committed to the safe, responsible, and ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Our AI systems will be developed and deployed with fairness, accountability, privacy, security, reliability, and transparency in mind. - We will use our AI systems to enhance, not replace, human decision-making. Human-in-the-loop will ensure all critical decisions are reviewed and approved by qualified public officials to ensure accuracy and accountability. - We are transparent about our AI use and its impact. We will regularly update this statement on our AI initiatives and their outcomes. ### Transparency statement This transparency statement is reviewed at least annually, or whenever there is a significant change to the ATSB’s approach to AI. ### Why we use AI ATSB recognises the value in using modern the "enable, engage, and evolve" framework. We will be transparent in our internal use of AI technology as we explore, evaluate and adopt AI technology to benefit our work and our stakeholdechnology, including AI, to improve our workplace efficiency and effectiveness and assist with quality control and accuracy. We see AI as an opportunity to reduce administrative burden on our staff, allowing them to focus on areas of their work that best use their experience, expertise, and judgement. ### How we use AI The ATSB’s current AI focus is on improving workplace productivity and information discoversy. Currently, ATSB does not plan to use AI in services that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by. If this changes, we will update this statement to detail our use of AI. ## **AI use** Presently, t- **Productivity:** Assisting with administrative tasks, summarising and drafting documents, drafting emails and managing inboxes, transcribing interviews, note taking in meetings. - **Information discovery:** Search tools and chat bots to assist with finding and retrieving information across various internal repositories, as an alternative to traditional search. - **Data analytics and coding:** Analysis of datasets, development of scripts and code for data analytics and software systems. - **Training materials and research:** Developing internal training materials and explanatory guides, assisting with policy development and research. ### What we do not use AI for - **Investigative decision-making:** The ATSB does not utilise AI to deliver any of its services. Although, the ATSB did participate in the Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilotmake decisions or findings in the course of transport safety investigations. All investigative conclusions remain the result of human analysis. - **Employee relations:** AI is not used for HR recruitment, hiring decisions, performance management, or other areas with direct human impact. - **Public interaction:** We do not use AI for any direct service delivery or as a primary point of contact for external stakeholders. ### **Monitoring and governing AI use** The ATSB is developing an overarching agency approach to AI and will establish an AI Steering Committee to assess the opportunsafeguards All AI outputs are subject to human review. The ATSB adheres to the principle that AI assists, but does not replace, human judgment. Before any AI-generated content is used in an official capacity, it must be verified by a staff member for accuracy, fairness, and compliance with our standards. All decisions, outcomes, and work products are reviewed, owned and managed by a human. We operate AI within secure, controlled environments to ensure that sensitives and risks in using AI within the agency. ##personal information is protected in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 and other relevant legislation and frameworks. ### Governance and accountability The ATSB has established governance frameworks to oversee the adoption of AI: - **Accountable official:** The Chief Operating Officer is the accountable official for AI and is supported by Chief Information Officer to assist in guiding implementation of AI governance and monitoring current and emerging systems to ensure AI is used in a safe, ethical and effective way. ## **AI transparency statement** This AI transparency statement was first published in March 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when any significant change is made to our approach to AI. - **Internal oversight:** We utilise internal governance processes to assess the opportunities and risks associated with new AI use cases before deployment. - **Training:** All staff undertake mandatory AI fundamentals training, and staff using key AI tools are provided with additional training and guidance on the responsible and ethical use of these technologies, including awareness of bias and data security. ### Contact us For questions or further information about our AI usage contact [**ai@atsb.gov.au**](mailto:ai@atsb.gov.au).

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaVolunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request intervsupport/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this pagea1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australi2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike6/careers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.

Published 27 March 2025 Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) recognises the potential …

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **812 days ago**

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Conditions of entryMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Contact Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.

… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Careersonditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)onditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry appr … cal reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?5/senate-chamber-tom-ferguson-collection-heritage.jpg.webp?h=b7d2572b&itok=2GWN_mMI) ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.

… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Contact uareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry) ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Ho1/Statement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?

… our capabilities. Our use of AI is informed by and aligned with the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service and the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The department is developing its own AI Strategy and Roadmap for th … ent of Education’s use of AI is overseen by our AI Accountable Officers and a Chief AI Officer. The AI Accountable Officers: - areis the primary contacts for whole‑of‑government AI assurance and coordination, and keeping staff informed of AI policy obligations and changes., - areis accountable for implementing AI policy within the agency, including governance frameworks, transparency statements and internal registers, - oversees AI risk assessments and ensures appropriate controls are in place,. The department’s AI Accountable Officers are: - is Kerryn Kovacevic, Chief Information Officer - Matthew Johnston, First Assistant Secretary, Strategy, Data and Measurement T. The department’s Chief AI Officer is responsible for: - leading and championing a department-wide approach to AI adoption, driving change and uplifting AI literacy in the department, - identifying, prioritising and sponsoring high-value AI use cases, - reporting to the department’s Chief AI Officer is responsible for driving value, adoption and cultural change through AI. Executive Board, working with the AI Accountable Officer to ensure AI adoption occurs within agreed risk boundaries and in alignment with whole-of-government policy and community expectations. The department’s Chief AI Officer will be in place by June 2026is Brendan Moon, First Assistant Secretary, Child Care Integrity Division. ## Governance and transparency The department is maturing its AI g … o minimise risk and safeguard the public, the Department of Education **does not** use AI for automated decision-making. All decisions **are made by staff** , ensuring human oversight and accountability. ## Review and Updates …

… which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoptionnode/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. Thi …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [VolunteerContact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadorabout/contact) Do you have questions for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoADfeedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting3/MoAD-Changemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **68 days ago**

Back to top The Digital Transformation Agency's [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Pol … nnually, or when any significant change is made to our approach to AI. Quick Links [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)

278 February 20256 The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is dedicated to the adoption and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. This Transparency Statement outlines our approach to AI use within the NHMRC, in accordance with the DTA's [pigital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for responsible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policyai/ai-in-government-policy/staff-training). ## Purpose of AI Uuse The NHMRC encourages the use of AI to achieveGenerative AI (GenAI) to enhance our productivity, where it is ethical and safe to do so. Our AI initiatives include aut … r work to support the overall mission of building a healthy Australia. GenAI is not relied upon for decision-making in NHMRC. ## AI Aapplications Currently, the NHMRC primarily uses Microsoft’s Copilot as its AI tool. Copilot allows staff to apply AI for the purposes of: - **Automation and Efficiency** - AI aFollowing a [pilot](https://www.digital.gov.au/initiatives/copilot-trial) and [evaluation](https://evaluation.treasury.gov.au/publications/evaluation-generative-artificial-intelligence) of Microsoft 365 (M365) Copilot, NHMRC staff have access to the licenced version providing enterprise data protection. M365 Copilot allows staff to use GenAI, as per the \[DTA classification system\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Standard for AI transparency statements 2.0_0.pdf), for the purposes of: ### Workplace productivity - Automatesing repetitive tasks (for example, meeting transcriptions, minutes, searching for emails or sorting data), allowing staff to focus on more complex and value-added activities. - **Office Productivity** - AI is employed to Structuring content in documents such as internal reports. - Generating and debugging code used in systems and applications development and maintenhance textual interpretation and generation by understanding and. ### Corporate and enabling - GenAI is used to support internal HR and IT advice using simple SharePoint agents. ### Analytics for insights - Used to support a range of respondrting in natural language, such as structuring text in documents or summarisand analytics activities such as internally classifying research topics. _Note: We also allow staff to access certain public GenAI tools in linge written material.h the DTA's guide on APS use of public generative AI tools._ ## Monitoring and Ggovernance The NHMRC has established governance mechanisms to ensure the ethical and effective use of AI. This includes: - **Training:** – All staff musing Copilot complete [AI fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-fundamentals) training to ensure that there is always human involvement for any processes where AI is applied. - **Community of Practice** :– An inclusive group that meets regularly to discuss AI- related risks and opportunities. - **Governance Fforums:** – We use our range of existing forums integrating AI issues such as security and privacy. ## Public Iimpact and Ccompliance We are committed to protecting the public from potential ne … lic may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by AI. We will use the DTA’s [AI assurance frameworkimpact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-frameworkai/impact-assessment-tool) to review the impact of AI against [Australia'’s AI eEthics pPrinciples](https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/Australia's%20AI%20ethics%20principles). . The NHMRC will also adhere to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as. NHMRC is implementing the DTA'’s [pPolicy for responsible AI in government v2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policyai/ai-in-government-policy) and following its guidance on [use of public generative AI tools](https://www.dta.gov.au/media-releases/dta-releases-new-guidance-australian-government-use-public-generative-ai-tools). ## Transparency and Uupdates This Transparency Statement is part of our commitment to open … to reflect any changes in our AI practices and policies. ### Update Hhistory - 6 May 2026: Updated version published. - 26 February 2025: Initial version published. ## Contact Iinformation For more information about our AI initiatives or to provid …

… 0for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) along with the, [Standard for AI transparency statements(Opens in a new tab/window)]( … 24-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and the [Interim[Staff guidance on government use of public generative AI tools(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://architecturewww.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai), shapes the Australian Government’s approach to adopting the benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) while supporting its safe, ethical and responsible use of AI. This transparency statement developed below helps align with DTA’s requirements. The National Health Funding Body (NHFB) and our Shared Services provider (the Department of Health and Aged Care) is, Disability and Ageing) are committed to the safe, ethical and responsible adoption and enhancement of our AI capabilities to support our vision of improving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. - Scope The purpose of thisis AI transparency statement is to explains how the NHFB intends to use AI and the measures we take to ensure it … AI technologies by the government. - Definitions #### What is AI? AI technology was agreed byThe Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries in November 2023 to be defineds AI as “a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, … how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Dif … s vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.” The dDepartment of Health, Disability and Ageing, along with other Commonwealth agencies, haves adopted the OECD definition of AI as outlined in the [Policy for the … of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf). ## AI transparency statement ### Why we uThe NHFB **uses authorised AI The National Health Funding Body (NHFB) seeks to enhance the qua tools** (such as Anthropic’s Claude and Microsoft Copilot) on a limited basis, when undertaking routine internal administrative matters to maximise productivity, such as summarising internal politcy and efficiency of our services through our commitment to innovation and excellence. The NHFB may pursue utilising AI to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides while carefully managinformation and producing Minutes of internal meetings. The NHFB adopts a ‘ _**best practice, fit-for-purpose for a small agency’**_ approach across all business activity, including using AI. The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (Health) provides shared services to the NHFB, including IT services and related guidance. Health’s AI guidance specifies that only authorised AI tools may be introduced and used for approved use cases. The NHFB continues to assess available AI tools to determine the benefits the technology provides while ensuring that our AI initiatives align with our values and are ing the risks to support our visionbest interests of the public. The NHFB is developing a strategic position on our AI adoption. The strategy will include the use of imapproving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. ### How we use AI Ted AI tools that enhance the quality and efficiency of our services to support our commitment to innovation and excellence. The NHFB will also meet the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) requirements under its _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (the policy) along with the Standard for AI transparency statements, Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools and Australia’s_. This includes having an AI use case register, AI impact assessments and clear guidance for staff about AI Eethics Pprinciples, provides requirements for Australian Government agencies to use AI safely,. ### In-scope The NHFB is committed to the safe, ethical and responsiblye and ethically. This statement outlines how the NHFB will implement these policy requirements. The NHFB may use both generative and narrow model AI and idoption and enhancement of AI capabilities to support our vision of improving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. In accordance with the DTA’s Cclassification systems for use, weAI in government, the NHFB may use AI as described below: - Usage Patterns – this includes providing insights through analytics, and enhancing workplace productivity. This allows our people to focus … may include corporate and enabling, service delivery and data analysis to identify patterns or anomalies in data to support legislative compliance. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains include: - Summarising reports, meeting minutes, and stakeholder feedback. - Drafting documentation. - Conducting general background research. All outputs generated with the assistance of AI in the NHFB will be assessed by a humaperson as an ongoing operation to provide meaningful assessment and oversight and not for decision making purposes. ### Public interaction and impact At present, the NHFB does not utilise public facing AI applicationsto ensure accuracy and reliability of outcomes. ### Out-of-scope One of the NHFB’s key priorities is to ensure thate involve direct public interaction or significant public impact. This transparency statement will btegrity of public hospital funding by identifying and analysing public hospital services to minimise dupdated if this changes ### Ensuring safe and responsible use of AI The NHFB is committed to using AI responsibly and transparently, ensuring that our AI initiatives align with our values and are in the best interests of the public. We will continue to work closely with our Shared Services provider and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. We will be transparent as we enable, prepare, engage, and embrace responsibly the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. The NHFB will work to adopt our Shared Services provider AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DTA’s Policy, advice and guidance on for the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. We will also ensure these will conform with the proposed mandatory guiderails for AI in high-risk settings that are currently being developed by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources. We will leverage whole of Australian Governmenlicate payments made through other Commonwealth programs. This data is excluded from use in any AI capacity, until such time as AI tools are approved for this level of sensitive information. ### Compliance with relevant legislation As part of our adoption of AI technology, we are ensuring compliance with all relevant legislation: - Archives Act 1983 (Cth) - Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) - Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) - NHFB’s Privacy Policy. The NHFB will continue to evaluate, review or update our data governance requirements against the application of AI, to ensure our approach remains fit for purpose and in keeping with the provisions and the NHFB’s obligations under the _National Health Reform (NHR) Act 2011._ ### Public interaction and impact The NHFB does not utilise public facing AI applications that involve direct poublicies and internally develop additional policies and guidance materials as required for the following elements: - AI Governance and approval processes - Acceptable use of AI in the agency - Ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - Record keeping - Privacy and consent - Security, procurement of AI systems - Risk mitigation and technical guardrails - Roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internally developed policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. This t interaction or significant public impact. This Statement will be updated if this changes. ### Accountable Official The NHFB’s Deputy Chief Executive Officer is appointed as the **AI Accountable Official** (AI AO). The AI AO oversees AI use cases and ensures we comply with whole-of-government AI policies and ethical guidelines. The AI AO will review the NHFB’s AI Transparency sStatement will be updated as the NHFB continues to develop and evolve the usage, policies and technology. ### Accountable Official The Deputy Chief Executive Officeat least once a year and update it if we make any major changes to how we use AI, or isf appointed as our AI Accountable Official for the NHFB. ### How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any qnything new needs to be included. ### Contact us Questions about this statement or the NHFB’s use of AI you can, please contact our AI Accountable Official as follows: Evia email: [nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Postal Address: **National Health Funding Body**\ Attn: AI Accountable Official\ GPO Box 1252\ CANBERRA ACT 2601\ Australia FriEmail: [nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Wed, 20256-02-285-06 12:00

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CarVolunteers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/carsupport/volunteers) Join our team and help us tellOur volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storyies of Australian democracyOld Parliament House.  Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and planCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plancareers) FJoind our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  Find our latest media releases, downloard of Old Parliament Hopublicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Hocareers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Censuse](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-hopolicies-and-plans/policies/APS-censuse) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [About Old Parliament HoAPS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **26 days ago**

# AI Transparency Statement ### Introduction The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)'s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20gGovernment%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) 1 and provide for safe and responsible use of AIArtificial Intelligence (AI). The Office of Commonwealth Ombudsman (the Office), including the ACT Ombudsman, is committed to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful usage of AI toopportunities for AI to help us deliver our mission of _“helping people, improving government”_. We willAny use of AI bey transparent in our assessment, preparation, engagement, adoption, monitoring, and pivot to changes in AI technology, environment and policy requirements. ### Scope and Usage Currently, the Office uses AI for the following activities: 1. Support security monitoring of its ICT systems. This AI is embeddedhe Office is carefully considered for compatibility with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles and the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government. These require transparency in how AI is used by the Office. This statement explains: - the scope and classification system for AI use into the monitoring software we use, with access limited to ICT and Cyber Security personnel that are suitably cleared, trained, and have a need to know and need to access the monitoring system. No direct public access. 1. AI Assistants to support code completion and programming. This AI is used to assist with developing, configuring, maintaining and testing commercial softwareOffice - ways we do and don’t use AI in the Office - the policy and governance for AI use in the Office. ### Tools in use The Office currently uses specific AI tools to make our work more efficient. This helps staff to focus on more complex and meaningful work. Currently, the Office uses. Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The use of these AI Coding Assistants is only for approved use cases of the Office’s system. All Human and AI assisted coding and system development, must undergo testing to ensure accuracy before being implement as part of the Office technical change management processes. The public does noI for the following activities: 1. To create a short summary of complaints to the Office. This summary is used to help us find the right team and staff member to assist with the complaint (“allocation”), and to help us prioritise the most currgently access systems that are supported by the complaints (“triage”). These summaries are never used tools. 1. Use of Azure AI Text to Speech to support the c make a decision about what action to take in relation of internal training materials based on a precise human generated text script. Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The Office has also completed pilots of two Microsoft AI capabilities – Microsoft Co-Pilot and Microsoft Azure AI services. The Azure AI pilot, within the Office secure IT environment, tested the feasibility of using Azure AI services to summarise written complaints for decision makers to review in order to process them. If we do implement any additional AI use cases and technologies, we will updato a complaint. 1. To populate complaint forms from information we receive by letter or email. This helps minimise manual data entry. These suggestions must be confirmed by an Officer before they are recorded. 1. To support security monitoring of our ICT systems. This AI is embedded into the monitoring software we use, and uses machine learning to help us identify new security threats. 1. To support development and programming. This is limited thiso statement to outline our use, with a summary of: - why the Office is using AI - the legislative authority for the use of AI - whether the public may directly interact with the AI or be significantly impacted by it - how the Office intends to notify those affected by our use of AI - what role AI plays in relation to decision-making, administrative action or service delivery, or other such usage patterns and domains as described in tff involved in developing new ICT capabilities in the Office and supports them with code completion. 1. We use Text-to-Speech software to support the creation of internal training materials based on a human generated text script. If we decide to use AI in new ways in the future, we will update this statement to explain how this may affect you. ### Scope and classification The Digital Transformation Agency publishes [Ca classifications system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) - measures to identify and protect the public against negative impacts and other risk mitigation measures - measures in place to identify and remediate errors - how the use complies with administrative law principles, is consistent with human rights obligations, applicable legsites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%202.0_0.pdf) for the use of AI in government. In this system, the Office’s use of AI primarily falls into the **workplace productivity** pattern. This means we may use AI to automate routine tasks, manage workflows and to support triage and categorislation including the [Privacy Act 1988](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text) and the [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au) - compliance with each requirement under the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) _._ Tof communications. The Office uses AI in the **service delivery** domain, to support staff to register, categorise and triage complaints. We do not use AI in making decisions. We also use AI in the **corporate and enabling** domain, including HR, finance, media, communications, and IT. ### Prohibited use Certain uses of AI are prohibited within the Office. We does not currently use or intendallow staff to use AI tools to make discretionary decisions in accordance with the best practices set out in the Office’s [Automated Decision-making Better Practice Guide](https://www.ombudsman.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/288236/OMB1188-Automated-Decision-Making-Report_Final-A1898885.pdf). ### Governance **AI Governance**\ Each AI use case and AI technology in the Office requires the Ombudsman’s approval, after endorsement by the Information Technology Governance Committee (ITGC) chaired by the Deputy Ombudsman. ecisions under our legislation. Statutory decisions are always made by an Officer with the appropriate delegation. We also do not allow staff to use AI to generate text to be used in communications outside the Office. Our communications with complainants about their complaint are always written by an Officer. ### **AI Uusage Ppolicy and Pprocesses**\ We have an internal AI Policy that aligns with advice and guidance provided by the DTA and other agencies for using AI services responsibly. We have processes to ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible - our staff are appropriately trained in AI - any relevant and likely cyber, data and privacy risks are identified and addressed - our AI access and usage is monitored - our stakeholders have trust in our use of AI. ______________________________________________________________________ **This policy helps ensure: - we have a framework to adopt AI where it can support us to do our work more effectively and efficiently, consistent with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles - our AI use has appropriate governance - our staff are appropriately trained in AI systems - relevant risks are identified and appropriately treated - our use of AI supports our reputation and does not compromise stakeholder trust in our work. Each use case requires individual approval after a detailed impact assessment. Low and medium risk use cases can be approved by the Chief AI Officer. High risk use cases are considered by the Office's Executive Committee. The Office does not currently engage in any high-risk use of AI. ### Accountable Officials**\ The Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer are the designated AI Accountable Officials. **Transparency Statement Updates**\ This statement will be reviewed annually or when we change our AI use cases and usage. ### Contact For questions about this statement or for further information onif you would like to make a complaint about how the Office’ has usage of AI, please contacted AI you can do so by writing to: [ai@ombudsman.gov.au](mailto:ai@ombudsman.gov.au). ### Change Llog ______________________________________________________________________ **Date**| **Note**\ ---|---\ 27 February 2025| Initial release.\ 20 December 2025| Add AI Assistant for Code Completion and Programming Usage and Text to Speech for training materials.\ April 2026| Update to reflect revised AI Policy and new use cases. [1] [Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI …

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans) JoFind our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Getting here anliament-House-Tom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old pParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofabout/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Cens1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-censd-parliament-house) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoADOld Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.

… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Venue hireCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Placareers) Join your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Ho1/Statement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell thcontact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people story of Australian democracy become active citizens.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interv3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiews and film shoots.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?6/careers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.

… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shootsenue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)ment-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?

… e recognise the increasing use of AI and the benefits it could afford.\ If the NCA implements any AI capability, this statement will be update … tions behind why the NCA is using AI or is considering its adoption - [classification](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)1 of AI use according to usage patterns and domains - [classification](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)1 of use where the public may directly interact with, or be significant … igital.gov.au/responsible-use-of-AI-in-government) _._ **Accountable oOfficial** The Chief Information Officer is designated as the NCA’s accountable official. **AI tTransparency sStatement** This AI transparency statement was first published to our website in February 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to our approach to AI, as outlined above. Should the NCA approve the use of AI, this statement will be updated t … [Contact Us](https://www.nca.gov.au/contact-us) page of this website. [1] As per the [Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)

… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **3 hour2 days ago**

# Attorney-General’s Department Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Print ## Introduction We are trialling the use of Aartificial Iintelligence (AI) as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to harness analytical tools and techniques to: - predict service needs - improve user experience - support evidence-based decisions - gain efficiencies in agency operations. We are committed to ensuring the way we develop, deploy and use AI systems is transparent, accountable and fairto help our staff work more effectively and support the department's responsibilities.\ We are using AI to: - summarise and compare information to - support policy and legal work - draft and refine routine internal content to improve consistency and timeliness - classify and manage documents to support records and information management - identify patterns and unusual activity in system information to support cyber security and protective practices. We only use AI where it is appropriate for the task and the information involved. AI supports staff, but it does not replace human judgement – staff remain accountable for decisions and for any content or actions informed by AI. We are committed to using AI in ways that are transparent, accountable and fair. Our use of AI is confined to non‑decision making activities and does not directly interact with the public. All AI use is subject to governance arrangements and mandatory human oversight. This transparency statement explains the AI systems we use, how they function, and the data they rely on. This aligns with the Australian Government’'s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and the requirements for AI transparency. It is also part ofreflects our ongoing commitment to safe and responsible use of AI and innovati … ply these technologies to: - automate routine administrative tasks - assist with drafthelp draft and refinge routine, internal and non-sensitive communicntent - summarise publicly available reports and synthesise information from multiple sources - simplify or clarify content to make it easier to understand - support research by identifying publicly available information and relevant references - provide analytical support, such as outlining options, risks or considerations - automate document classification and categorisation - analyse sentiment to understand patterns and trends in large data sets - categorise documents using predictive analyticsupport information security by analysing system activity to detect behaviour that differs from normal usage patterns and generate alerts for human review. ### Future use of AI Any expansion of our AI use will be subject to: - risk assessment - approval through established governance processes - compliance with the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_. We will update this transparency statement if our use of AI changes. ## Data privacy and security PWe are committed to protecting the privacy and security of personal, sensitive and classified information is of paramount importance to us. We en. We make sure that any data used in AI systems is handled in accordancline with the [ _Privacy Act 1988_ (Cth) ](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), the [ _Protective Security Policy Framework_](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) and other relevant data protection laws. Personal information is We only collected, used, and shared where personal information when necessary, and in ways that comply with our [privacy policy](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy "Privacy policy"). ## AI governance and oversight We have developed guidance material and implemented rigorous governance processes in place to monitor and oversee the use of AI within the department. This includes: - appointing accountable officialsthe Chief Information Officer as the accountable official and a Chief AI Officer in line with the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_ and AI Plan for the Australian Public Service - ensuring governance bodies have oversight ofee all AI projects within the department - developing policies guidingfor staff use of AI and information technology systems - making AI traini … ectively within the department - maintaining user accreditation under _the _Data Availability and Transparency Act 2022_ - implementing the Commonwealth’'s AI Assurance Framework. ## Usage patterns and domains The followingImpact Assessment tool. ## Monitoring and assurance We monitor AI use through a combination of policy controls, user guidance and ongoing review. This includes: - monitoring authorised use of AI tools - requiring staff to check outputs for accuracy and appropriateness - reviewing AI use as part of broader information and technology governance activities. Staff can report inappropriate outputs, privacy or security concerns, or unintended disclosure of information. The appropriate areas then investigate these reports. If issues are identified, we may restrict, correct or pause AI use while we complete a full assessment. ## Usage patterns and domains This section shows how we classify our AI use and the domains in whichwhere we apply it, in keep. This is in linge with the [Classification system for AI use ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) u … ## Usage patterns The following usage patterns describe our use of AI: - analytics for insights - workplace productivity - image processing. ### Doma. #### Analytics for insights We use AI to help analyse large amounts of data and identify patterns or trends that may not be obvious. This can support better understanding of issues, improve planning and inform policy or service delivery. AI provides insights and summaries only. Staff review and interpret the results before they are used. #### Workplace productivity We use AI tools to assist staff with everyday tasks such as drafting documents, summarising information and organising work. This improves efficiency and allows staff to focus on more complex or high-value work. Staff review and edit any AI-generated content before it is used. AI does not replace human judgement. #### Image processinsg We apply AI tools across the department in the following domains: - service delivery - compliance and fraud detection - policy and legal - corporate and enabling services. ## Continuous improvement As part of our ongoing commitment to responsible AI, wuse AI to analyse and process images, such as identifying objects, features or patterns in photos or scanned documents. This supports tasks like classification, quality checks, or record management. Staff check all results to make sure they are accurate and appropriate. ### Domains We use AI in the following domains: - service delivery - compliance and fraud detection - policy and legal - corporate and enabling services. ## Public interaction and significant impact The _Standard for AI transparency statements_ guidance requires agencies to provide classification details for AI use where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI or its outputs without human review. None of our currently deployed AI systems result in direct public interaction or generate outputs that significantly impact an individual without mandatory human review. Although we use technologies such as generative AI, chatbots and natural language processing across domains including service delivery, these systems are exclusively designed to assist staff with internal processes, analysis and administrative tasks. All AI outputs and recommendations that could potentially impact a member of the public are subject to **mandatory human oversight and approval** before any final action or communication takes place. ## Risks and mitigations Our AI use presents risks that include: - incorrect or incomplete outputs - bias introduced through model training - use beyond intended purposes. We manage these risks through defined controls. These include: - restricting AI use to approved tools, - only allowing the use of publicly available AI tools with information already in the public domain - mandating AI training for staff - requiring staff to independently verify AI outputs. Our guidance makes it clear that AI outputs are not authoritative and any identified issues may lead to corrective action, restrictions or stopping use of the tool. ## Continuous improvement We regularly review and update our AI policies and practices. This includes staying informed aboutkeeping up to date with new developments in AI technology, ethics, and regulatory requirements. We strive to improve the transparency, fairness, and effectiveness of our AI systemsuse through continuous learning and adaptationimprovement. We will review this statement: - every year annually, - when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, orAI use - when new factors impaaffect this statement. ## Contact information We are committed to engaging with stakeholders and providing opportunities for feedbackus We value feedback and engagement on our use of AI systems. If you have questions, or concerns, or would like more information about how we use AI, please [contact us using the [departmental contact usform](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/contact-us "Contact us").). **Due for review:** 1 November 2026, or upon significant change

# WGEA AI transparency statement In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government, the following information provides the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency.\ Consistent with Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government, an AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Whereas automated systems range from traditional rules-based systems (for example a system which calculates a rate of payment in accordance with a formula set out in legislation) through to more specialised systems which use automated tools to predict and deliberate, including through the use of machine learning. ## Usage\ At this time, WGEA does not employ AI in service delivery. AI is not use in compliance, auditing, or statutory decision-making processes. WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corporate and enabling functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processes and automating routine tasks. Use tools like automated document summarisation and virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency. ## Public interaction and impact At this time, WGEA is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. The WGEA is using AI in the domain of Corporate and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivity.\ ## Monitoring and Accountability The Chief Operating Officer was designated as the accountable official on 19 December 2024\. As the accountable official, the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for ensuring the compliance of AI use in accordance with internal and external policies, and relevant regulations and legislation within the Agency.\ ## Responsible AI usage policy As part of the governance of AI use in the Agency, a responsible AI usage policy will be developed to ensure alignment with the resources provided by the Digital Transformation Agency. ## Contact Information For inquiries or feedback regarding WGEA’s use of AI, please contact us at wgea@wgea.gov.au. ## Review and Updates This AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 25 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.

CM. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIAL # AI transparency statement This statement provides details of how the Royal Australian Mint (the Mint) uses AI, as directed by the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government. An officer has been identified who will be the point of contact for the implementation of the Policy for Reasonable use of AI in Government at the Mint. The officer, and any other individuals participating in the implementation of the Policy have received fundamentals training in AI as a minimum. ## How the Mint uses AI As per the classification system for AI use, the Mint uses AI in the following usage patterns and domains:\ ### Usage patterns • - Workplace Productivity •- Image Processing ### Domains • - Corporate and enabling •- Service Delivery •- Compliance and fraud detection •- Policy and legal In the use of Image Processing, the Mint uses basic shape recognition for identifying humans. The Mint does not identify individuals via facial recognition or any other biometric markers.\ At this time, the Mint does not use AI in a way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. The Mint’s use of AI is for the development of internal documentation, including research and drafting.\ As a part of its commitment to responsible use of AI, including ensuring accountability for accuracy and decision making, Mint employees review all AI outputs. This is known as Human-in-the-loop (HITL). The Mint understands the use of AI must be based on Australia’s AI Ethics Principals: • - human, societal and environmental wellbeing\ • - human-centered values\ • - fairness\ • - privacy protection and security\ • - reliability and safety\ • - transparency and explainability\ • - contestability\ • - accountability. OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2 The Mint is committed to applying the cyber security requirements outlined in the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM) and the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF), using a risk-based approach to ensure the secure operations of all AI applications. The AI space is evolving, and as such the Mint will continue to monitor and evaluate its current and potential future approach to AI use.\ The Mint will ensure integration with the whole of government approach to AI adoption, participating in\ AI forums and processes where applicable. To this end, this statement will be updated as required to describe what AI will be used for, and what it will not be used for.\ This review will be conducted annually, or when there is change to how AI is used at the Mint. ## Controlled content information - Controlled by John Cock, CISO - Date of effect 25 March 2026 - Approved by Emily Martin, CEO - Document no. D25/8915 - CM container 25/347 - Contact Melinda Hodges

# Policy for the responsible use of AI in government – Office of Parliamentary Counsel’s AI Transparency Statement ## Introduction The Office of Parliamentary Counsel (OPC) is trialling the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to harness analytical tools and techniques to predict service needs, improve user experience, support evidence-based decisions and gain efficiencies in agency operations. At the time of release, OPC is only beginning to use AI. OPC is committed to ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness in its development, deployment, and use of AI systems. This Transparency Statement provides information about the AI systems OPC uses or will use, how they function, and the data they rely on. This aligns with the Australian Government’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and the requirements for AI transparency and is part of our ongoing commitment to safe and responsible use of AI and responsible innovation. ## Scope and Applications The AI technologies we use or will use include generative AI, machine learning, natural language processing, and speech recognition. These technologies are or will be applied in the following contexts: • - Automating routine administrative tasks •- Assisting with developing routine internal and non-sensitive communications •- Sentiment analysis to understand patterns and trends in large data sets ## Data privacy and security Protecting the privacy and security of individuals' data, sensitive and classified information is of paramount importance to us. We ensure that any data used in AI systems is handled in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), the Protective Security Policy Framework and other relevant data protection laws. Personal information is only collected, used, and shared where necessary, and in ways that comply with our privacy policies. ## AI governance and oversight We are developing guidance material and implementing rigorous governance processes to monitor and oversee the use of AI within OPC. This includes: • - Appointment of an Accountable Official in accordance with Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. •- Establishing mechanisms for oversight of all AI projects by senior management within OPC. •- Developing policies relating to use of AI and information technology systems by all staff in OPC. •- Availability of AI training for all staff. •- Using the Commonwealth’s AI Assurance Framework for new uses of AI. ## Usage patterns and domains The following section identifies OPC’s classification of AI use and the domains where they are applied in accordance with the classification system for AI use under the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government: ### Usage patterns The following usage patterns describe possible use of AI in OPC: • - Decision making and administrative action •- Analytics for insights •- Workplace productivity •- Image processing ### Domains The following domains describe the domains where AI tools are applied across OPC: • - Service delivery •- Compliance and fraud detection •- Policy and legal •- Corporate and enabling services. ## Continuous improvement As part of our ongoing commitment to responsible AI, we will regularly review and update our AI policies and practices. This includes staying informed about new developments in AI technology, ethics, and regulatory requirements. We strive to improve the transparency, fairness, and effectiveness of our AI systems through continuous learning and adaptation. This statement will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when new factors impact this statement. ## Contact information We are committed to engaging with stakeholders and providing opportunities for feedback on our use of AI systems. If you have questions, concerns, or would like more information about how OPC uses AI, please contact us at:\ • - Email: enquiries@opc.gov.au\ • - Mailing Address: Locked Bag 30, Kingston ACT 2604, AUSTRALIA

taxombudsman.gov.au # AI transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. ## How the IGTO uses AI  The IGTO is committed to the safe and responsible adoption of AI in our services. We are embedding a culture that fairly balances AI risk management and innovation. This statement will be updated as we introduce new uses for AI. Our current use of AI is solely for the benefit of improved efficiency in our internal processes. AI is only used in our complaints to keep people informed of complaint progress, although we are exploring chatbot technology. We have no plans to apply AI in any decision making. The IGTO makes available to all staff a version of Microsoft Copilot that has enterprise data protection, meaning our data does not leave our ICT environment. The IGTO is using AI: • - in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint process and routine communications, but not decision making • - in the domain of corporate and enabling, through the granting general access to Copilot for all staff, for example, budget management and development of corporate documentation • - in the usage pattern of workplace productivity, such as by automating tasks and workflows, and summarising content • - in the usage pattern of analytics for insights, such as by debugging code used in data analysis and extracting key themes from free text. taxombudsman.gov.au ## AI safety and governance  We have updated our ICT conditions of use policy to include the use of AI tools by all staff: • - Staff are required to read and accept these conditions of use. • - Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically. • - Staff are only permitted to use enterprise AI technology and are restricted from using less secure forms of AI (in practice, we progressively restrict the URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use). The DTA policy requires the appointment of an accountable official. The IGTO has appointed its Chief Information & Security Officer. Our CISO is responsible for developing an IGTO implementation plan, monitoring and measuring policy implementation, notifying the DTA of new high-risk AI use cases, facilitating cross- government coordination, staying updated with policy changes, and reviewing and updating the statement annually or when significant changes occur. The accountable official also reports to the executive committee which oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI. If you have any enquiries about this statement, please contact igt@igt.gov.au. Last updated – 19th February, 2025 taxombudsman.gov.au

OFFICIAL OFFICIAL # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement\ December 2025 The High Speed Rail Authority (the Authority) follows the Australian Government’s Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government. This Transparency Statement outlines the Authority’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption and is consistent with the standard for AI transparency statements released by the Digital Transformation Agency.\ ## Purpose for using AI or considering its adoption The Authority is exploring the use of AI to deliver improved performance and value across planning, delivery, and future operations of high speed rail in Australia. In particular, the Authority is seeking to embrace AI to: • - Drive productivity through streamlined, data-driven workflows and faster iteration. •- Reduce costs via predictive analytics, optimisation, and automation. •- Enhance safety with intelligent monitoring, risk detection, and predictive maintenance •- Elevate customer experience through real-time support, personalised seamless journeys •- Create long-term public value by enabling sustainable operations, regional connectivity, and economic growth. ## How AI is or may be used at HSRA AI is increasingly becoming a valuable technology with the capacity to enhance productivity and support staff in their daily tasks. Currently, primary use of AI is through Microsoft Copilot, which is securely integrated into Microsoft digital products to assist with workplace productivity. The Authority is actively monitoring AI developments and identifying practical opportunities for its application across planning, delivery, operations, and corporate functions. This includes: • - Partnering with third parties such as contractors, advisors, and other government agencies who may incorporate AI into their service delivery. •- Leveraging AI assistants embedded in widely available corporate solutions to improve collaboration and communication. According to DTA’s Classification system for AI use, the Authority has identified the following proposed AI usage patterns and domains: • - Usage patterns are expected to be as follows:\ o - Decision making and administrative action – Supporting, not replacing, human decision- makers. o - Analytics for insights – This is a core component of our AI roadmap. o - Workplace productivity – This will be a strong focus for our corporate and enabling functions. •- Domains are proposed to be:\ o - Service delivery – Key applications may include modelling passenger demand, optimising routes and schedules and enhancing stakeholder engagement. OFFICIAL OFFICIAL o - Compliance and fraud detection – AI models may be used to support procurement oversight and enhance compliance monitoring\ o - Policy and legal – AI may be used to simulate policy outcomes, analyse regulatory implications, and inform investment prioritisation.\ o - Corporate and enabling – AI may be applied across corporate functions, including procurement, communications and enterprise productivity tools. ## Public interaction Currently, the Authority’s use of AI does not directly interact with the public, with human oversight ensuring transparency as applications evolve. ## Compliance with applicable legislation and regulation\ The Authority is committed to ensuring any future adoption of AI technology aligns with Australia’s AI ethical principles, is compliant with the Policy for responsible use AI in government, and consistent the Standards and Guidelines provided by the Digital Transformation Agency.\ Information provided to the Authority is handled in compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 and the Authority’s policies, including Privacy Policy. To support AI systems being safely adopted in the future, governance and oversight will be implemented to ensure their effectiveness and compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), other relevant legislation and government policy.\ ## Measures to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes The Authority is establishing suitable governance and oversight arrangements to support future AI use. This includes a governance framework and an AI policy, AI procedures, delegations, roles and responsibilities along with training and third-party oversight.\ AI-related risks are included in the Authority’s risk management framework to ensure appropriate oversight and assurance. Should the Authority consider adopting further AI technologies directly, the Authority will conduct risk assessments, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) and/or other assessment processes. The Authority will ensure that safeguards are in place to protect individual’s rights and prevent adverse outcomes. Additional oversight mechanisms will be considered for higher-risk or sensitive use cases.\ Where the Authority engages contractors, advisors, or third-party service providers for AI solutions, their use of AI on the Authority’s behalf will align with our AI Governance Framework.\ The Authority will seek independent third-party audits where appropriate, and maintain an up-to-date AI use case register.\ Staff training on AI is an important consideration of the governance and oversight protocols being developed. Staff training and capability development is ongoing, encouraged and subject to change based on needs, systems, and developments in this area. The Authority follows DTA guidance on AI training within the Guidance for staff training on AI, including suggested APS modules such as the AI in Government fundamentals training course and may utilise GovAI resources. The Authority will adapt the training approach subject to innovations and change in this area.\ The General Manager Customer Place and Operations is the Accountable official for AI in the Authority. This Transparency Statement was last updated in December 2025, and will be updated annually or if the Authority make significant changes on the approach to AI. If you have any questions about the statement, please contact us.

OFFICIAL OFFICIAL AI Transparency Statement\ February 2025 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 1 of 3 AI Transparency Statement Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 What is Artificial Intelligence? ................................................................................................................. 2 Accountable Officials .............................................................................................................................. 2 Domains of AI Usage.............................................................................................................................. 2 AI Governance ........................................................................................................................................ 3 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 2 of 3 AI Transparency Statement\ Introduction\ Published # AI Transparency Statement Page Content ​The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) (the policy) mandat requires all departments and agencies to designateappoint accountable officials for thto oversee policy implementation, and . It also requires them to publish a statement outlexplaining their approach to AI adoption and use, known as a (‘transparency statement’) .\. The Department of Home Affairs (the department) is responsible for providing services, policy, and regulation across a range of domains including immigration and border protection, citizenship, cyber and national security. In delivering its role effectively and efficiently, the department incorporates the safe and responsible use of data and enabling technologies including various forms of Artificial Intelligence (AI).\ What is Artificial Intelligence? Following the DTA, the department adopts the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of an AI system:\ ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’\ Accountable Officials\ The Chief Data Officer (CDO) is the Accountable Official for AI under the policy and responsible for leading the department's data and AI program. This includes improving AI literacy, policy monitoring and improvement, robust and ethical AI design and management, and implementation of governance and assurance mechanisms for AI adoption in the secure and safe technology environments provided by Information Communication Technology (ICT). Domains of AI Usage The department embraces opportunities presented by emerging technologies by developing and adopting AI systems in support of decision-making, risk mitigation and management, and administrative actions in a safe and responsible manner. The department uses AI to boost productivity by optimising processes across various domains:\  Service Delivery: with a range of systems to improve efficiency of department’s service to clients such as automated registration of submissions and applications; or image processing systems to facilitate passenger movements.\  Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security: the trained AI systems use advanced analytics for insights to inform a data-driven approach to risk identification, intelligence gathering and crime prevention.  Corporate and Enabling: the explorative use of AI systems to support administrative tasks and research leading to faster generation of products for internal use such as feedback analysis of large surveys to derive key learnings that enable organisational growth and transformation.  Compliance and Fraud Detection: AI systems are used to identify and share information with partners to supplement compliance activities, keeping the Australian community safe and ensuring the integrity of Australia's migration program. The department uses both internal and third party AI systems, with ongoing human monitoring and decision making to ensure AI use is safe, legal and ethical. OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 3 of 3 AI Transparency Statement\ AI Governance The department is committed to transparency and accountability in using AI, ensuring responsible implementation as the technology evolves. To ensure safety, security and ethical use of its AI systems, the department has implemented a number of controls for governing, monitoring and managing AI-related risks by:  aligning Home Affairs’ AI Ethics Policy with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and maki, including ABF (the department), published its first Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement in February 2025. The department updated this statement in March 2026. The updated statement below explains how the department uses AI safely and responsibly, in line with whole-of-government policy and oversight from our Accountable Official. It also outlines how we use AI to support our functions, manage risks, and streng the policy compliant with both international and Australian human rights legislation, such as Racial Discrimination Act 1975, Australian Human Right Commission Act 1986 and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights  implementing processes and procedure, to enable continuous and transparent improvement of AI systems  embedding human monitoring, verification, and intervention on all AI system-generated outputs  monitoring and mitigating AI distinct and specific risks and potential harms to privacy, fairness, transparency and explainability as well as safety and security of its technology environments  delivering a comprehensive data and AI literacy program to its workforce.n governance, transparency and accountability as AI continues to evolve.​

www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1 # AI Transparency Statement ## Introduction This statement outlines how the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Agency) uses artificial intelligence (AI), how AI-related risks are governed and managed, and how the Agency complies with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0 and other applicable Commonwealth AI legislation, regulations, and frameworks.\ The Agency is committed to a safe and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting harmonious, productive, cooperative, and compliant workplace relations. This means that while AI systems and capabilities may provide insights or administrative support, all decisions regarding compliance, enforcement, and entitlements, are made by authorised Agency staff. AI systems and capabilities are strictly advisory, and their outputs are reviewed and verified by our staff. ## Approach to AI use Our use of AI is guided by the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0, the Department of Industry Science and Resources Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and our Agency's core operational principles. We use secure, commercially available software (including generative AI systems and AI capabilities) to address a variety of AI use cases, enabling our staff to focus on high-value complex work. ## Classification of AI use Consistent with the DTA’s Classification system for AI use, we classify our current AI use cases under the following usage patterns; noting we do not use AI where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by it: Domain Decision making and administrative action Analytics for insights Workplace productivity Image processing Service delivery\ Compliance and fraud detection Internal use\ Law enforcement, intelligence and security Internal use\ Policy and legal Internal use Internal use\ Scientific\ Corporate and enabling Internal use Internal use www.fairwork.gov.au Page 2 ## Governance To ensure appropriate AI governance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated accountability roles including that of the: • - AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI Accountable Official (AO), responsible for the implementation and oversight of AI initiatives. •- Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role of Chief AI Officer (CAIO), providing strategic leadership, and helping drive AI adoption and cultural change within the Agency. ## Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through the Agency’s existing risk management procedures and protocols and executive oversight. The following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of AI technologies: • - Risk assessment s: We apply Agency risk management processes to evaluate proposed AI systems and AI capabilities, taking into consideration, privacy, security, and operational risks before and after deployment. •- Executive oversight: The AO provides high -level oversight of the Agency’s AI adoption to ensure it remains within the Agency's risk appetite and aligns with whole -of-government policy. •- Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is continually monitored by authorised staff using the AI systems and AI capabilities.\ ## Compliance The Agency is compliant with the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0. We have established a strategic approach to AI adoption, which will be formalised with the Agency’s AI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework in March 2026.\ ## Reviews, update, and contact information This transparency statement was last updated on 27 February 2026. It will be reviewed and updated: • - at least once a year •- when making a significant change to the Agency's approach to AI •- when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. For any enquiries or comments regarding this statement, please contact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement ## Overview This statement accords with the Digital Transformation Agency’'s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government. ## Definition The Bureau applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## Recognised benefits The Bureau has benefited from limited use of AI. For example, we took part in the DTA's 2024 whole-of-government trial of Copilot for Microsoft 365. We acknowledge the potential benefits of further research and adoption of AI technologies. We commit to: • - safe and responsible use of AI •- ensuring AI implementation aligns with Australian Public Service values and prioritises staff wellbeing. ## How we use AI The Bureau applies the Australian Governments classification system to categorise: • - h ow AI is used, and •- t he domains in which it is applied. ### Domains We may use AI across these domains: • - scientific\ • - corporate and enabling ### Use We may use AI in the following ways.\ #### Automate or simplify routine tasks\ • - Using AI to help our organisation to be more productive, by: o - supporting workflow management,\ o - reducing administrative burden, and\ o - enhancing communications. #### Support decision making and administrative actions\ • - Using AI to guide, assess or make recommendations to a human decision maker.\ #### Identify, understand and present insights • - Using AI to support data analysis and reporting. #### Support software development • - Using AI to assist technical staff with drafting and reviewing code, while maintaining human oversight and accountability. ## AI in forecasting The Bureau has used computer science to prepare data for forecasts since the 1970s. Computer science is broader than the field of AI.\ We use advanced computational science, such as advanced statistical techniques and computational physics, to: • - process large volumes of data, and •- perform complex calculations to produce forecast outputs. We also use machine learning to calibrate, verify and automate these outputs. Our scientists and meteorologists provide quality control as appropriate. Before going into production, all computer science practices are subject to rigorous: • - research, •- testing, and •- assurance.\ This includes machine learning and AI in forecasting services. All key applications used to generate forecasts are built specifically for our use. They are built, maintained and managed in-house. We do not use neural network systems – 'generative AI' – for weather forecasting outputs. The suitability of these techniques is an active field of research at the Bureau. ## Public interaction and impact We commit to ensure AI does not negatively impact our customers, including the public. We will adopt a gradual approach to any future use of AI modelling methods. Our intent is to improve the impact and value of our services. Humans review, validate and authorise any public content created or supported by AI. This aims to ensure it is fair and accountable.\ ## Monitoring\ Our executive team oversees the Bureau's strategic direction and use of AI. This involves regular review to ensure responsible and effective use.\ ## Compliance The Bureau has adopted Australia’'s 8 AI ethics principles. We have internal guidelines to ensure AI is used in line with these principles.\ The guidelines include activities to help the Bureau apply each principle in practice. These activities are based on the Department of Finance's National Assurance Framework.\ The Bureau will: • - use AI according to relevant legislation, frameworks and policies •- follow mandatory requirements in the Policy for responsible use of AI in government. We will regularly review compliance to the Australian Government's AI policy landscape. This will happen through existing governance and environmental scanning practices.\ AI use in the Bureau's forecasting and prediction services: • - accords with research guidelines, and\ • - complies with the usual standard of scientific scrutiny.\ ## Accountable Official The Bureau's Chief Information and Technology Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This appointment was made in November 2024.\ ## Contact for AI enquiries For questions about this statement, contact us. ## Updates to this statement This statement was last updated on 2 March 2026. We review and update this statement yearly, or when: • - our approach to AI changes, or •- there is material change to its accuracy.

# AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM # AI TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT April 2025 2 ## 1. Introduction The Australian National Maritime Museum (ANMM) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI offers significant opportunities to improve productivity and aim to continuously improve our Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities. We will be transparent as we engage, integrate and adapt to changes in AI technology, the environment, and government policy requirements. We govern our AI usage in line with applicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (the Policy) and best practice. The Policy sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI while providing for safe and responsible use of AI. ANMM believes transparency is critical to building public trust and it is an important aim of the Museum, as well as the Policy and the broader APS Reform agenda. In this statement, we describe: • - How we use and manage AI •- How we ensure safe and responsible usage •- Compliance to the Policy ## 2\. How we use AI ANMM adheres to Australia’'s AI Ethics Principles, demonstrating our commitment to protecting privacy and security. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.\ ANMM uses AI in some of its corporate and enabling activities and workplace productivity. We allow some of our staff to use AI in their work with the objective of enhancing productivity and service delivery.\ AI is used by our staff in the following areas: • - planning stages of creative work •- to assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documents, emails or other content •- to assist in some administrative functions\ • - assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts •- data analytics and reporting •- people counting •- cyber security monitoring and response activities AI is not widely used across ANMM systems, however we recognise that AI is an increasingly prevalent and critical component of many systems and usage is increasing. We will use AI for its benefits in creating business efficiencies and reducing human error.\ Where AI components have been incorporated into proprietary software or ICT products used by ANMM, we will consider using these components if: • - there is a demonstrated benefit to ANMM's audience; and •- the Museum’'s data governance and compliance requirements are met. 3 ## 5. Safe and responsible Usage We are aware of potential risks and take a risk-managed approach to the adoption of AI. We use forms of AI which present low potential risk, and our AI governance ensures appropriate mitigation and management of risks. Risks are reviewed periodically and the Museum monitors usage and impact. ANMM has additional backups and audit arrangements in place to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of our data. The Museum has committed to:\ • - Only deploy AI tools that are authorised for access and use within ANMM. •- Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. •- AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. •- AI must not be the final decision-maker. 1## 6. Compliance The Museum complies with all applicable legislation and regulations and each requirement under the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government.\ This statement will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement. For further informati … nquiries about our adoption of AI please use our general enquiry email address info@sea.museum

Classification: OFFICIAL # Australian Electoral Commission Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement\ ## Background The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) notes the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (the Policy) requires that relevant agencies, including the AEC, release a transparency statement providing information about their use of AI.\ Consistent with the Policy, the AEC has provided the Digital Transformation Agency a link to this statement on the AEC website.\ The Policy also requires the AEC to nominate an accountable official for the implementation of the Policy. The AEC’'s AI Accountable Official is the First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation Group. The AEC has also appointed the Chief Information Officer to the role of the Chief AI Officer in recognition of the fundamental shift that generative AI is bringing to government operations and as required in the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service.\ ## The AEC’'s use of AI We have an internal policy on the use of AI by staff, which staff are required to follow when using AEC approved AI tools. This policy encourages and assists staff to:\ • - not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without human review •- understand safe and responsible use of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework •- not use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to assess potential AI tools for use based on the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. The AEC’'s use of AI includes: • - GitHub Copilot - GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed to improve productivity and efficiency of software application development. •- Microsoft 365 Copilot - The AEC is conducting a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed version) for staff using their AEC corporate accounts to evaluate its potential for supporting corporate tasks and individual productivity tasks. As a prerequisite to using Microsoft 365 Copilot, AEC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. The AEC’'s use of Microsoft co-pilot makes certain high-volume, manual tasks quicker – this allows AEC staff to use more of their expertise on higher-value work and make more informed decisions.\ • - Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat - By enabling Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff, the AEC is enhancing staff productivity and collaboration across teams. In no way does the AEC’'s use of Copilot replace AEC staff, their expertise or thorough consideration of their work. Protections are also in place to ensure it is a secure environment – it operates within Microsoft 365’s 's enterprise grade security controls and it is not used to train AI models. •- Other – Some AEC staff have access to assistive and adaptive technologies such as\ speech-to-text software along with a limited number of staff in our graphical design area who use AI to generate educational images. OFFICIAL Key election operations – including voting and the counting process – are undertaken manually, in accordance with electoral law.\ The AEC uses AI in the following domain and usage pattern: • - Domain: Corporate and enabling. The AEC’'s current use relates to supporting corporate functions and improving operational efficiency. •- Usage pattern: Workplace productivity. The AEC’'s current use is for workplace productivity purposes. This includes summarising and analysing data and information, automating or reducing time spent on administrative tasks and supporting software application development. More information about usage patterns and domains is available at Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au ## Identifying and protecting against risks to electoral integrity The AEC acknowledges the transformative potential of AI for society and government, including operational efficiencies and enhanced data analysis. The 2024 Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot showed productivity improvements but also highlighted barriers, concerns, and risks associated with AI in government. Public trust in the AEC is crucial for maintaining confidence in electoral processes and results, which is essential for defending Australia's democracy. In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, meeting community and stakeholder expectations is increasingly complex. To maintain public confidence, the AEC emphasises the importance of transparency in how AI is used in its operations, security, and information systems as detailed above in "The AEC’'s use of AI”". ## Third-party suppliers The AEC has processes in place to manage the potential use of AI by third-party suppliers. Agreements with third party providers contain confidentiality requirements that the provider is contractually required to adhere to. Where applicable, the AEC additionally requires all relevant provider personnel are Australian citizens and may require that personnel possess Australian Government security clearances at a level the AEC deems appropriate per-role.\ For applicable agreements (i.e. managed service arrangements), the AEC contractually requires that AEC data remains onshore in Australia.\ In cases where the provider is delivering an IT capability that processes AEC data, such solutions are subject to the AEC’'s review and approval through its governance processes. Any potential utilisation of AI as part of such solutions would be identified as part of this process, including with respect to potential data sovereignty issues. ## Governance and legislation ### Governance Structure Senior Executive Committee (SEC): • - overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and agency direction •- chaired by the Australian Electoral Commissioner OFFICIAL •- approves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with the Investment Committee. Investment Committee: • - security and risk considerations relating to AI use •- strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI use. Advisory Audit Committee: • - established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act). ### Compliance with Legislation and Regulation • - Privacy Act 1988: Regulates the collection, storage, and use of personal information by AI •- Archives Act 1983: Governs records created by AI •- Freedom of Information Act 1982: Provides public access to documents created by AI. ### Oversight and Audits • - Compliance overseen by the SEC. •- Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance. •- The Regulatory Action Plan guides the AEC's approach to regulatory compliance, including application of the new AI Policy. ## Updates to this statement Consistent with the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, this statement will be updated at least once a year, or when the AEC makes a substantial change to the agency's approach to AI, or when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. This statement was updated on 9 February 2026 and is authorised by AEC’'s AI Accountable Officer. ## Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.au

# AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 1 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 # ACQSC AI Transparency Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) employs Artificial Intelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically. The Commission complies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), in its role as whole-of-government coordinator on the use of AI by the Australian Public Service (APS), including: • - Policy for the responsible use of AI in government •- Standard for accountable officials •- Standard for AI transparency statements •- Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools •- Australia’'s AI Ethics Principles ## Our stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). ‘ 'An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’' The Commission’'s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026. ## Why we use AI The Commission is dedicated to enhancing the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a responsible and safe manner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities, while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support our work to protect and improve the safety, health, wellbeing and quality of life for people receiving aged care services. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 ## How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s 's classification system: • - Usage patterns: o - Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, and o - Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ • - Domains: o - Compliance, o - Corporate and enabling, and o - Service delivery. ## Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI applications do not impact the public, and members of the public are not required to interact with AI applications in dealings with the Commission. This transparency statement will be updated if this changes. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying any negative impacts from the use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. ## Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI • - The Commission ensures that AI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests of the public, including the recipients of aged care services. •- The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice.\ The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliance as it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission’'s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop additional, Commission specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission’'s ongoing commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 3 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology.\ ## Accountable Official The Commission’'s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Officials.\ ## How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or the Commission’'s use of AI, you can contact the Commission as follows:\ • - email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 2026

WGEA AI transparency statement In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government, the following information provides the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency. \ Consistent with Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government, an AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Whereas automated systems range from traditional rules-based systems (for example a system which calculates a rate of payment in accordance with a formula set out in legislation) through to more specialised systems which use automated tools to predict and deliberate, including through the use of machine learning. Usage \ At this time, WGEA does not employ AI in service delivery. AI is not use in compliance, auditing, or statutory decision-making processes. WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corporate and enabling functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processes and automating routine tasks. Use tools like automated document summarisation and virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency. Public interaction and impact At this time, WGEA is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. The WGEA is using AI in the domain of Corporate and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivity. \ Monitoring and Accountability The Chief Operating Officer was designated as the accountable official on 19 December 2024\. As the accountable official, the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for ensuring the compliance of AI use in accordance with internal and external policies, and relevant regulations and legislation within the Agency. \ Responsible AI usage policy As part of the governance of AI use in the Agency, a responsible AI usage policy will be developed to ensure alignment with the resources provided by the Digital Transformation Agency. Contact Information For inquiries or feedback regarding WGEA’s use of AI, please contact us at wgea@wgea.gov.au. Review and Updates This AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 25 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.

______________________________________________________________________ ## **AI Transparency Statement** Screen Australia is committed to safe, ethical, and responsible use … the principles outlined by the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [ _Policy for the rResponsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai/ai-in-government-policy), _,_ this statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption, and how AI related risks are being managed. #### How we use AI Screen Australia enables staff and contractors to u … and maintaining public trust. In March 2026, we updated our internal _Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia Employees & Contractors._ The policy incorporates the Australian Government’s [_AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) \_\_ and [_Staff guidance on public generative AI._](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai).\_\_ We also implemented mandatory training for staff on the responsible u … - are fully accountable for all work products, advice and decisions - must not input anything into an AI tool that could reveal confidenti … alls into several domains and usage patterns as outlined by the DTA’s [_Classification system for AI use._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) These are: - The domains of ‘service delivery’ and ‘corporate and enabling’; and - The usage patterns ‘workplace productivity’ and ‘analytics for insights’. #### Managing stakeholder usage Any use of AI by our stakeholders, includ … creen Australia’s [Terms of Trade](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/screen-australia/about-us/doing-business-with-us/terms-of-trade/), the relevant program guidelines, and any applicable laws. We are co … ble use of AI. In September 2024, Screen Australia published a set of [ _AI Guiding Principles,_](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/corporate-documents/policies/ai-guiding-principles/) _,_ which publicly articulates our expectations around the proposed use o … key principles are: - Talent, creativity, culture and the individual - Transparency - Ethical use of AI - Diversity, equity and inclusion - Fairness - Responsibility and accountability. In 2025, Screen Australia update … tter inform the agency on how AI tools may be used by applicants. #### Monitoring & Cand compliance Screen Australia has a risk-based approach to the use of AI … ilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use cases - acting as Screen Australia’s contact point for AI - engaging with whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keeping up to date with changing requirements. For enquiries about …

CM. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIAL AI transparency statement This statement provides details of how the Royal Australian Mint (the Mint) uses AI, as directed by the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government. An officer has been identified who will be the point of contact for the implementation of the Policy for Reasonable use of AI in Government at the Mint. The officer, and any other individuals participating in the implementation of the Policy have received fundamentals training in AI as a minimum. How the Mint uses AI As per the classification system for AI use, the Mint uses AI in the following usage patterns and domains: \ Usage patterns • Workplace Productivity • Image Processing Domains • Corporate and enabling • Service Delivery • Compliance and fraud detection • Policy and legal In the use of Image Processing, the Mint uses basic shape recognition for identifying humans. The Mint does not identify individuals via facial recognition or any other biometric markers. \ At this time, the Mint does not use AI in a way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. The Mint’s use of AI is for the development of internal documentation, including research and drafting. \ As a part of its commitment to responsible use of AI, including ensuring accountability for accuracy and decision making, Mint employees review all AI outputs. This is known as Human-in-the-loop (HITL). The Mint understands the use of AI must be based on Australia’s AI Ethics Principals: • human, societal and environmental wellbeing \ • human-centered values \ • fairness \ • privacy protection and security \ • reliability and safety \ • transparency and explainability \ • contestability \ • accountability. OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2 The Mint is committed to applying the cyber security requirements outlined in the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM) and the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF), using a risk-based approach to ensure the secure operations of all AI applications. The AI space is evolving, and as such the Mint will continue to monitor and evaluate its current and potential future approach to AI use. \ The Mint will ensure integration with the whole of government approach to AI adoption, participating in \ AI forums and processes where applicable. To this end, this statement will be updated as required to describe what AI will be used for, and what it will not be used for. \ This review will be conducted annually, or when there is change to how AI is used at the Mint. Controlled content information Controlled by John Cock, CISO Date of effect 25 March 2026 Approved by Emily Martin, CEO Document no. D25/8915 CM container 25/347 Contact Melinda Hodges

… ormation/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corp …

… ible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Print this page \_\_ ## Purpose of AI Use The NHMRC encourages the use of AI to achieve pr …

… al information where we are authorised to do so under the Privacy Act. - \[Email\](mailto:?subject=Privacy and disclosures&body=https://www.nema.gov.au/about-us/privacy-disclosures "Email this page")

… create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ## You may also be interested in...  Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategBW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS CensuCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy. ### [MediaLearn](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)

OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement \ December 2025 The High Speed Rail Authority (the Authority) follows the Australian Government’s Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government. This Transparency Statement outlines the Authority’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption and is consistent with the standard for AI transparency statements released by the Digital Transformation Agency. \ Purpose for using AI or considering its adoption The Authority is exploring the use of AI to deliver improved performance and value across planning, delivery, and future operations of high speed rail in Australia. In particular, the Authority is seeking to embrace AI to: • Drive productivity through streamlined, data-driven workflows and faster iteration. • Reduce costs via predictive analytics, optimisation, and automation. • Enhance safety with intelligent monitoring, risk detection, and predictive maintenance • Elevate customer experience through real-time support, personalised seamless journeys • Create long-term public value by enabling sustainable operations, regional connectivity, and economic growth. How AI is or may be used at HSRA AI is increasingly becoming a valuable technology with the capacity to enhance productivity and support staff in their daily tasks. Currently, primary use of AI is through Microsoft Copilot, which is securely integrated into Microsoft digital products to assist with workplace productivity. The Authority is actively monitoring AI developments and identifying practical opportunities for its application across planning, delivery, operations, and corporate functions. This includes: • Partnering with third parties such as contractors, advisors, and other government agencies who may incorporate AI into their service delivery. • Leveraging AI assistants embedded in widely available corporate solutions to improve collaboration and communication. According to DTA’s Classification system for AI use, the Authority has identified the following proposed AI usage patterns and domains: • Usage patterns are expected to be as follows: \ o Decision making and administrative action – Supporting, not replacing, human decision- makers. o Analytics for insights – This is a core component of our AI roadmap. o Workplace productivity – This will be a strong focus for our corporate and enabling functions. • Domains are proposed to be: \ o Service delivery – Key applications may include modelling passenger demand, optimising routes and schedules and enhancing stakeholder engagement. OFFICIAL OFFICIAL o Compliance and fraud detection – AI models may be used to support procurement oversight and enhance compliance monitoring \ o Policy and legal – AI may be used to simulate policy outcomes, analyse regulatory implications, and inform investment prioritisation. \ o Corporate and enabling – AI may be applied across corporate functions, including procurement, communications and enterprise productivity tools. Public interaction Currently, the Authority’s use of AI does not directly interact with the public, with human oversight ensuring transparency as applications evolve. Compliance with applicable legislation and regulation \ The Authority is committed to ensuring any future adoption of AI technology aligns with Australia’s AI ethical principles, is compliant with the Policy for responsible use AI in government, and consistent the Standards and Guidelines provided by the Digital Transformation Agency. \ Information provided to the Authority is handled in compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 and the Authority’s policies, including Privacy Policy. To support AI systems being safely adopted in the future, governance and oversight will be implemented to ensure their effectiveness and compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), other relevant legislation and government policy. \ Measures to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes The Authority is establishing suitable governance and oversight arrangements to support future AI use. This includes a governance framework and an AI policy, AI procedures, delegations, roles and responsibilities along with training and third-party oversight. \ AI-related risks are included in the Authority’s risk management framework to ensure appropriate oversight and assurance. Should the Authority consider adopting further AI technologies directly, the Authority will conduct risk assessments, Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) and/or other assessment processes. The Authority will ensure that safeguards are in place to protect individual’s rights and prevent adverse outcomes. Additional oversight mechanisms will be considered for higher-risk or sensitive use cases. \ Where the Authority engages contractors, advisors, or third-party service providers for AI solutions, their use of AI on the Authority’s behalf will align with our AI Governance Framework. \ The Authority will seek independent third-party audits where appropriate, and maintain an up-to-date AI use case register. \ Staff training on AI is an important consideration of the governance and oversight protocols being developed. Staff training and capability development is ongoing, encouraged and subject to change based on needs, systems, and developments in this area. The Authority follows DTA guidance on AI training within the Guidance for staff training on AI, including suggested APS modules such as the AI in Government fundamentals training course and may utilise GovAI resources. The Authority will adapt the training approach subject to innovations and change in this area. \ The General Manager Customer Place and Operations is the Accountable official for AI in the Authority. This Transparency Statement was last updated in December 2025, and will be updated annually or if the Authority make significant changes on the approach to AI. If you have any questions about the statement, please contact us.

OFFICIAL OFFICIAL AI Transparency Statement \ February 2025 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 1 of 3 AI Transparency Statement Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................ … .................................................................... 2 What is Artificial Intelligence? .................................... … .................................................................... 2 Accountable Officials ............................................... … .................................................................... 2 Domains of AI Usage.................................................. … .................................................................... 2 AI Governance ....................................................... … .................................................................... 3 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 2 of 3 AI Transparency Statement \ Introduction \ The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (the policy) mandates all departments and agencies to designate accountable officials for the policy implementation, and to publish a statement outlining their approach to AI adoption and use (‘transparency statement’) . \ The Department of Home Affairs (the department) is responsible for providing services, policy, and regulation across a range of domains including immigration and border protection, citizenship, cyber and national security. In delivering its role effectively and efficiently, the department incorporates the safe and responsible use of data and enabling technologies including various forms of Artificial Intelligence (AI). \ What is Artificial Intelligence? Following the DTA, the department adopts the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of an AI system: \ ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ \ Accountable Officials \ The Chief Data Officer (CDO) is the Accountable Official for AI under the policy and responsible for leading the department's data and AI program. This includes improving AI literacy, policy monitoring and improvement, robust and ethical AI design and management, and implementation of governance and assurance mechanisms for AI adoption in the secure and safe technology environments provided by Information Communication Technology (ICT). Domains of AI Usage The department embraces opportunities presented by emerging technologies by developing and adopting AI systems in support of decision-making, risk mitigation and management, and administrative actions in a safe and responsible manner. The department uses AI to boost productivity by optimising processes across various domains: \  Service Delivery: with a range of systems to improve efficiency of department’s service to clients such as automated registration of submissions and applications; or image processing systems to facilitate passenger movements. \  Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security: the trained AI systems use advanced analytics for insights to inform a data-driven approach to risk identification, intelligence gathering and crime prevention.  Corporate and Enabling: the explorative use of AI systems to support administrative tasks and research leading to faster generation of products for internal use such as feedback analysis of large surveys to derive key learnings that enable organisational growth and transformation.  Compliance and Fraud Detection: AI systems are used to identify and share information with partners to supplement compliance activities, keeping the Australian community safe and ensuring the integrity of Australia's migration program. The department uses both internal and third party AI systems, with ongoing human monitoring and decision making to ensure AI use is safe, legal and ethical. OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 3 of 3 AI Transparency Statement \ AI Governance The department is committed to transparency and accountability in using AI, ensuring responsible implementation as the technology evolves. To ensure safety, security and ethical use of its AI systems, the department has implemented a number of controls for governing, monitoring and managing AI-related risks by:  aligning Home Affairs’ AI Ethics Policy with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and making the policy compliant with both international and Australian human rights legislation, such as Racial Discrimination Act 1975, Australian Human Right Commission Act 1986 and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights  implementing processes and procedure, to enable continuous and transparent improvement of AI systems  embedding human monitoring, verification, and intervention on all AI system-generated outputs  monitoring and mitigating AI distinct and specific risks and potential harms to privacy, fairness, transparency and explainability as well as safety and security of its technology environments  delivering a comprehensive data and AI literacy program to its workforce.

www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1 AI Transparency Statement Introduction This statement outlines how the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Agency) uses artificial intelligence (AI), how AI-related risks are governed and managed, and how the Agency complies with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0 and other applicable Commonwealth AI legislation, regulations, and frameworks. \ The Agency is committed to a safe and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting harmonious, productive, cooperative, and compliant workplace relations. This means that while AI systems and capabilities may provide insights or administrative support, all decisions regarding compliance, enforcement, and entitlements, are made by authorised Agency staff. AI systems and capabilities are strictly advisory, and their outputs are reviewed and verified by our staff. Approach to AI use Our use of AI is guided by the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0, the Department of Industry Science and Resources Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and our Agency's core operational principles. We use secure, commercially available software (including generative AI systems and AI capabilities) to address a variety of AI use cases, enabling our staff to focus on high-value complex work. Classification of AI use Consistent with the DTA’s Classification system for AI use, we classify our current AI use cases under the following usage patterns; noting we do not use AI where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by it: Domain Decision making and administrative action Analytics for insights Workplace productivity Image processing Service delivery \ Compliance and fraud detection Internal use \ Law enforcement, intelligence and security Internal use \ Policy and legal Internal use Internal use \ Scientific \ Corporate and enabling Internal use Internal use www.fairwork.gov.au Page 2 Governance To ensure appropriate AI governance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated accountability roles including that of the: • AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI Accountable Official (AO), responsible for the implementation and oversight of AI initiatives. • Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role of Chief AI Officer (CAIO), providing strategic leadership, and helping drive AI adoption and cultural change within the Agency. Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through the Agency’s existing risk management procedures and protocols and executive oversight. The following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of AI technologies: • Risk assessment s: We apply Agency risk management processes to evaluate proposed AI systems and AI capabilities, taking into consideration, privacy, security, and operational risks before and after deployment. • Executive oversight: The AO provides high -level oversight of the Agency’s AI adoption to ensure it remains within the Agency's risk appetite and aligns with whole -of-government policy. • Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is continually monitored by authorised staff using the AI systems and AI capabilities. \ Compliance The Agency is compliant with the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0. We have established a strategic approach to AI adoption, which will be formalised with the Agency’s AI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework in March 2026. \ Reviews, update, and contact information This transparency statement was last updated on 27 February 2026. It will be reviewed and updated: • at least once a year • when making a significant change to the Agency's approach to AI • when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. For any enquiries or comments regarding this statement, please contact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.

… _Postal Address:_\ Commonwealth DPP\ GPO Box 3104\ CANBERRA ACT 2601 This statement was last updated in February 2026 and will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every 12 months.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Overview This statement accords with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government. Definition The Bureau applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Recognised benefits The Bureau has benefited from limited use of AI. For example, we took part in the DTA's 2024 whole-of-government trial of Copilot for Microsoft 365. We acknowledge the potential benefits of further research and adoption of AI technologies. We commit to: • safe and responsible use of AI • ensuring AI implementation aligns with Australian Public Service values and prioritises staff wellbeing. How we use AI The Bureau applies the Australian Governments classification system to categorise: • h ow AI is used, and • t he domains in which it is applied. Domains We may use AI across these domains: • scientific \ • corporate and enabling Use We may use AI in the following ways. \ Automate or simplify routine tasks \ • Using AI to help our organisation to be more productive, by: o supporting workflow management, \ o reducing administrative burden, and \ o enhancing communications. Support decision making and administrative actions \ • Using AI to guide, assess or make recommendations to a human decision maker. \ Identify, understand and present insights • Using AI to support data analysis and reporting. Support software development • Using AI to assist technical staff with drafting and reviewing code, while maintaining human oversight and accountability. AI in forecasting The Bureau has used computer science to prepare data for forecasts since the 1970s. Computer science is broader than the field of AI. \ We use advanced computational science, such as advanced statistical techniques and computational physics, to: • process large volumes of data, and • perform complex calculations to produce forecast outputs. We also use machine learning to calibrate, verify and automate these outputs. Our scientists and meteorologists provide quality control as appropriate. Before going into production, all computer science practices are subject to rigorous: • research, • testing, and • assurance. \ This includes machine learning and AI in forecasting services. All key applications used to generate forecasts are built specifically for our use. They are built, maintained and managed in-house. We do not use neural network systems – 'generative AI' – for weather forecasting outputs. The suitability of these techniques is an active field of research at the Bureau. Public interaction and impact We commit to ensure AI does not negatively impact our customers, including the public. We will adopt a gradual approach to any future use of AI modelling methods. Our intent is to improve the impact and value of our services. Humans review, validate and authorise any public content created or supported by AI. This aims to ensure it is fair and accountable. \ Monitoring \ Our executive team oversees the Bureau's strategic direction and use of AI. This involves regular review to ensure responsible and effective use. \ Compliance The Bureau has adopted Australia’s 8 AI ethics principles. We have internal guidelines to ensure AI is used in line with these principles. \ The guidelines include activities to help the Bureau apply each principle in practice. These activities are based on the Department of Finance's National Assurance Framework. \ The Bureau will: • use AI according to relevant legislation, frameworks and policies • follow mandatory requirements in the Policy for responsible use of AI in government. We will regularly review compliance to the Australian Government's AI policy landscape. This will happen through existing governance and environmental scanning practices. \ AI use in the Bureau's forecasting and prediction services: • accords with research guidelines, and \ • complies with the usual standard of scientific scrutiny. \ Accountable Official The Bureau's Chief Information and Technology Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This appointment was made in November 2024. \ Contact for AI enquiries For questions about this statement, contact us. Updates to this statement This statement was last updated on 2 March 2026. We review and update this statement yearly, or when: • our approach to AI changes, or • there is material change to its accuracy.

Skip to content or footer close info For Australian businesses experiencing supply chain volatility and disruptions, visit the [Go Global Toolkit](https://export.business.gov.au/find-export-markets/middle-east-updates-and-support) for the latest updates and support available. ## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition o …

… **Contact** For enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of AI, contact: [info@alrc.gov.au](mailto:info@alrc.gov.au)email protected]

# AI transparency statement Print this page Click to open the social media sharing options Share [ Share via Facebook ](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=ht …

Classification: OFFICIAL Australian Electoral Commission Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement \ Background The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) notes the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (the Policy) requires that relevant agencies, including the AEC, release a transparency statement providing information about their use of AI. \ Consistent with the Policy, the AEC has provided the Digital Transformation Agency a link to this statement on the AEC website. \ The Policy also requires the AEC to nominate an accountable official for the implementation of the Policy. The AEC’s AI Accountable Official is the First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation Group. The AEC has also appointed the Chief Information Officer to the role of the Chief AI Officer in recognition of the fundamental shift that generative AI is bringing to government operations and as required in the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service. \ The AEC’s use of AI We have an internal policy on the use of AI by staff, which staff are required to follow when using AEC approved AI tools. This policy encourages and assists staff to: \ • not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without human review • understand safe and responsible use of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework • not use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to assess potential AI tools for use based on the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. The AEC’s use of AI includes: • GitHub Copilot - GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed to improve productivity and efficiency of software application development. • Microsoft 365 Copilot - The AEC is conducting a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed version) for staff using their AEC corporate accounts to evaluate its potential for supporting corporate tasks and individual productivity tasks. As a prerequisite to using Microsoft 365 Copilot, AEC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. The AEC’s use of Microsoft co-pilot makes certain high-volume, manual tasks quicker – this allows AEC staff to use more of their expertise on higher-value work and make more informed decisions. \ • Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat - By enabling Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff, the AEC is enhancing staff productivity and collaboration across teams. In no way does the AEC’s use of Copilot replace AEC staff, their expertise or thorough consideration of their work. Protections are also in place to ensure it is a secure environment – it operates within Microsoft 365’s enterprise grade security controls and it is not used to train AI models. • Other – Some AEC staff have access to assistive and adaptive technologies such as \ speech-to-text software along with a limited number of staff in our graphical design area who use AI to generate educational images. OFFICIAL Key election operations – including voting and the counting process – are undertaken manually, in accordance with electoral law. \ The AEC uses AI in the following domain and usage pattern: • Domain: Corporate and enabling. The AEC’s current use relates to supporting corporate functions and improving operational efficiency. • Usage pattern: Workplace productivity. The AEC’s current use is for workplace productivity purposes. This includes summarising and analysing data and information, automating or reducing time spent on administrative tasks and supporting software application development. More information about usage patterns and domains is available at Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au Identifying and protecting against risks to electoral integrity The AEC acknowledges the transformative potential of AI for society and government, including operational efficiencies and enhanced data analysis. The 2024 Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot showed productivity improvements but also highlighted barriers, concerns, and risks associated with AI in government. Public trust in the AEC is crucial for maintaining confidence in electoral processes and results, which is essential for defending Australia's democracy. In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, meeting community and stakeholder expectations is increasingly complex. To maintain public confidence, the AEC emphasises the importance of transparency in how AI is used in its operations, security, and information systems as detailed above in "The AEC’s use of AI”. Third-party suppliers The AEC has processes in place to manage the potential use of AI by third-party suppliers. Agreements with third party providers contain confidentiality requirements that the provider is contractually required to adhere to. Where applicable, the AEC additionally requires all relevant provider personnel are Australian citizens and may require that personnel possess Australian Government security clearances at a level the AEC deems appropriate per-role. \ For applicable agreements (i.e. managed service arrangements), the AEC contractually requires that AEC data remains onshore in Australia. \ In cases where the provider is delivering an IT capability that processes AEC data, such solutions are subject to the AEC’s review and approval through its governance processes. Any potential utilisation of AI as part of such solutions would be identified as part of this process, including with respect to potential data sovereignty issues. Governance and legislation Governance Structure Senior Executive Committee (SEC): • overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and agency direction • chaired by the Australian Electoral Commissioner OFFICIAL • approves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with the Investment Committee. Investment Committee: • security and risk considerations relating to AI use • strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI use. Advisory Audit Committee: • established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act). Compliance with Legislation and Regulation • Privacy Act 1988: Regulates the collection, storage, and use of personal information by AI • Archives Act 1983: Governs records created by AI • Freedom of Information Act 1982: Provides public access to documents created by AI. Oversight and Audits • Compliance overseen by the SEC. • Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance. • The Regulatory Action Plan guides the AEC's approach to regulatory compliance, including application of the new AI Policy. Updates to this statement Consistent with the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, this statement will be updated at least once a year, or when the AEC makes a substantial change to the agency's approach to AI, or when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. This statement was updated on 9 February 2026 and is authorised by AEC’s AI Accountable Officer. Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.au

[Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.") # AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence [Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.")# AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence Release date and time 24/07/2025 11:30am AEST In accordance with t …

## Official Roles Safe Work Australia is developing its maturity and potential use cases for AI. While those use cases remain under consideration, AI usage is limited at the Agency. When discussing AI, we apply the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition](https://www.oecd.org/en.html): > An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, has appointed its Chief Information Officer to the role of AI Accountable Official and the Chief Operating Officer to the role of Chief AI Officer. ## Safe Work Australia’s Approach to AI Adoption and Use We are commendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## AI use Safe Work Australia has very limited AI usage. Any changes to our AI use will result in an update to this Transparency Statement.\ Safe Work Australia uses AI to perform research and analytics for insights to support our policy and legal functions. We havitted to exploring the safe and responsible adoption of AI to improve service delivery, policy outcomes and productivity while ensuring public trust is maintained. Safe Work Australia currently uses AI to: - support corporate an AId enabled application that can analyse large volumes of legal documentation to perform first level research, and an AI enabled application that aggregates data inputs for consumption. ### Usage Patterns Safe Work Australia employs AI in the following way: - Aing functions. - provide analytics for insights: where AI identifies, produces or understands insights about a material via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling, and/or reporting tools. ### Domains Our AI applications focus on: - Policy and Legal Functions: A- analyses policies and legal documents to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws. ### Ensuring Responsible Use - Safe Work Australia safeguards against risks and ensures responsible AI use through releasing an annual AI Transparency Statement to provide visibility on how AI is used and managed. ## Public interaction and impact We do not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it.\ Monitoring AI effectiveness and negative impacts ## Training and assistance All staff have accessSafe Work Australia has processes in place to ensure our AI use is appropriately governed and our AI access and usage is monitored. Prior to trgaining on the appropriate use ofaccess to AI, services and are encouraged to report concerns to the AI Accountable Official. ### Compliance We will only use AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. Safe Work Australia is committed to adapting our AI systems and advice as needed to align with evolving legislation, ethical standards, and public expectations. ### Policy for the responsible use of AI in government We comply with all mandatory requirements of the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. ### Accountable official The Group Manager, Corporate & Engagement was designated as the accountable official on 9 December 2024. ### AI transparency statement The AI transparency statement was first published to our website on 28 February 2025.taff must complete mandatory training. For further information or enquiries about Safe Work Australia’s adoption of AI, you can contact us directly at [businessservices@swa.gov.au](mailto:businessservices@swa.gov.au) _Theis statement will be reviewed annually or when we make a significant changes occur. ### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further information on the Agency’s usage of AI, please contact [businessservices@swa.gov.au](mailto:businessservices@swa.gov.au). to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement._

… tive information of its employees or customers into AI technologies. Comcare currently is exploring the use of AI in a limited and controlled manner, primarily to support internal analysis, information management, and workplace productivity. Comcare is undertaking a targeted program of work, aligned to Digital Transformation Agency guidance, to establish a practical, risk‑based framework for identifying, governing, and overseeing AI use across the agency. The focus is on strengthening governance, decision‑making, assurance, and visibility of AI activity, rather than delivering individual AI solutions. This governance uplift will guide future AI adoption at Comcare. ## Responsible use commitments Comcare sees benefits from using AI to improve the analysis and commun … AI usage to ensure continued security and compliance. This statement hwas been **published in February 2025 and reviewed in April 2026**. It will be reviewed annually, or earlier if Comcare's adoption of AI changesthere is a material change to Comcare’s use of AI. ## Contact us Comcare's Chief Information Office is designated as … ial under the Policy. If you have any enquiries about this statement, we can be reachedplease contact us via the details on the [contact us](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/contact/contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **20 day3 hours ago**

… tted to treating complaints seriously. This page provides information on our Agency’s obligations for handling personal information under the _Privacy Act 1988_ , how to raise concerns of wrongdoing under the provisions of the _Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013,_ and procurements that are not in the public interest if suspended whi … ficial Intelligence (AI) to help with preparedness, response, recovery, and risk reduction for all hazards, and to improve organisational eff … NEMA’s AI potential use cases are led by our AI Accountable Official -, the Chief Data Officer. This official ensures the safe, ethical, and … subscription service to you. Website privacy statement This website is, nema.gov.au, and ausalert.gov.au are managed by us (the Agency). This notification of collection outlines … nd disclosure of your personal information in relation to your use of thiseither website in accordance with the _Privacy Act 1988_. Learn more about our handling of personal information in our Privac … nformation #### Clickstream data (information logged) When visiting thiseither site, a record of your visit is logged. This ‘clickstream data’ is collected for statistical purposes and is used to help improve thise website and the experience of visitors. The following information is … (for example Windows, MAC) - your top-level domain name (for example .com, nema.gov.au) - the date and time of your visit to the site - the pages accessed - the documents downloaded - the previous site visited - the type of browser used. ### Disclosure We’ll only disclose your p …

… ARC has a separate policy to outline its expectations for the use of [_AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors_](https://www.arc.gov.au/node/11917 "Policy on Use of G. ## Use of generative artificial intelligence in ARC grant programs - applies to all ARC grant programs - provides guidance for applicants, administering organisations and assessors - takes effect from **28 April 2026** [Read the policy](https://www.arc.gov.au/publications/policy-use-generative A-artificial I-intelligence in the ARC's -arcs-grant s-programs").-2026) To ensure the appropriate, responsible and ethical application of AI …

… l. ### AI transparency statement This AI transparency statement was first publishlast reviewed in February 20256. This statement will be reviewed at least annually, or when anyat any time where a significant change is made to our or the Government’s approach to AI. [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)

Print ### Menu # AI transparency statement At NOPSEMA, we are excited to is exploreing the potentialuse of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhancimprove workplace productivity in a way that keeps humans at the centre of our, while ensuring that people remain accountable for all decision makings. We are pledgcommitted to dousing thisAI in a safe, secure, and ethical fashionmanner. ### Current AI usage Our AI usage is focused on enhancinguse of AI NOPSEMA currently uses AI to support internal corporate and enabling functions by way of AI tools such aonly. This includes: - meeting transcription and automated document summarisation - virtual assistants, thato streamline workflows and improve efficiency - deep data analysis, that helps us understand botho assist with interpreting structured and unstructured materialinformation. NOPSEMA does not currently use AI in service delivery - specifically AI is not used use AI in regulatory service delivery, including compliance, auditing or decision-making without having. Where AI is used, a human-in-the-loop. This means that while AI technologies may be used to assist in various tasks, any fina approach applies. AI may assist with tasks, but all decisions orand actions are made by a humanNOPSEMA staff. ### Future AI adoption Should we decide to extend our AI usage, or implementuse of AI If NOPSEMA expands its use of AI, or introduces any public -facing AI capabilities, we will update this statement to reflect this, includingy, this statement will be updated to describe: - ourthe purpose and objectives behind adopting AIintended outcomes of the AI use - any direct interactions the public may have with AI systems - measures tohow AI systems are monitor anded, evaluate the effectiveness of AI systemsd and reviewed - compliance with relevant legislation, policies and regulations - efforts to mitigateory obligations - how risks anyd potential negative impacts of AIare identified and mitigated. ### Governance and policy NOPSEMA is aligned tos with the [Australian Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and we areis committed to keeping our stakeholders informed about our AI initiatives. - We are developing an internal AI usage policy that conforms to government guidelines and best practices. - This AI transparency statement will be reviewed annually, or whenever significant changes occur in our approach to AI. - All staff will receive training on the responsible use of AI. ### Contact informationtransparent and responsible AI use. Oversight of AI at NOPSEMA is provided through existing governance arrangements, with the Chief Information Officer acting as the Accountable Official responsible for AI oversight and risk management. NOPSEMA's approach to AI governance includes: - applying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight - developing an internal AI usage policy aligned with whole-of-government requirements - managing current AI tools, such as Microsoft Copilot, through existing ICT, information security and risk management frameworks - providing all staff with access to training on the responsible and ethical use of AI. For any inquiries regarding this statement, or our AI initiativesn NOPSEMA's use of AI, please contact [ai@nopsema.gov.au.](mailto:ai@nopsema.gov.au).

… igeon-holes6.jpg.webp?itok=z6k4iJIR) # AI Transparency Statement ## **Introduction** The Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House (MoAD) is … terms are included in the 'definitions' section of this document. ## **How we use AI** - MoAD uses AI in some of its Corporate and Enabling works. This inc … Generative AI is not used to alter historical digital assets/records MoAD **does not** currently use AI in any services where members of the public directly interact with AI systems or are significantly impacted by AI outputs without human oversight. ## **Why we use AI** AI is not widely used across MoAD systems, however MoAD recognises t … k; and - the data governance and compliance requirements are met. ## **How we ensure quality and safety of data** MoAD manages the quality and safety of data through the following controls: - All use of AI at MoAD is subject to strict change and risk management processes to monitor impacts of change and new featurPeriodic reviews, audits, performance evaluation to monitor effectiveness of AI use cases;. - risks are reviewed periodically with seThorough robust risk and change management processes, in place in the occurrence that a risk elevates above our agency risk tolerance;cluding escalation thresholds and human review. - MoAD has additional backups and audit arrangements in place to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of our data;. - sStaff undertake mandatory training upon induction, with annual refresher training to ensure they complycompliance with quality and safety requirements of MoAD's AI policy; and. - tThe AI policy aligns with the [AI in government policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## **Classification of AI use** MoAD’s use of AI is classified under the DTA’s AI classification system as follows: - **Usage patterns:** improving workplace productivity, supporting analytics and reporting - **Domains:** corporate and enabling functions ## **Government policy alignment** The content on this page aligns with the Digital Transformation Agen … everage AI opportunities while ensuring its safe and ethical use. ## **Statement review process** This statement will be reviewed annually, or when MoAD makes a signi … ts approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement. ## **Contact** If you have any questions about MoAD's use of AI, please get in touch using our [contact form](https://www.moadoph.gov.au/about/contact). ## **Definitions ** **Artificial intelligence** – Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability of computer systems to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as: learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. **Contact and data matching** – refers to the process of identifying and linking records that repre … that information is accurate, consistent, and free from duplicates. **Corporate and enabling** – to enhance functions by automating processes, optimising resource a … patterns within records to ensure adherence to laws and regulations. **Generative AI** – a type of AI that can create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ## You may also be interested in...  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australi2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and political and social history.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) We offer unique and rewarding opportun6/Statement-Jack-Green%27s-paintings-exhibition-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.

# AI Transparency Statement 17 April 20256 The Federal Court of Australia Listed Entity1 (the Entity) is commit … to the safe, ethical and responsible use of AI in accordance with the _[AI Plan for the Australian Public Service](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) (the Plan) and the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)_ (the Policy). Our AI use is planned, undertaken and monitored in acco … _ (Cth)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), the _[Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/)_ , _[Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publica … ficial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles)_ , and the Entity's own policies relating to privacy, data and information technology. As required by the Plan, a Chief AI Officer will be appointed by July 2026. Two aAccountable oOfficials are nominated under the Policy and have responsibility for: … of these tools can increase productivity and efficiency. Separately, the use of an AI-based testing automation tool is under consideration forAI-based coding, design and testing automation tools are used within our Information Technology section. If adopted, the tool will improve the reliability, maintain to improve the efficiency, reliability, and scalability of web application testingbusiness-as-usual tasks. According to the classification system for AI use, the Entity's AI … l activity. ## Governance and risk management The Entity has issued internal policy guidance with the aim of addressing inherent risks associated w … ect the confidentiality of data. Under the guidance of the nominated aAccountable oOfficials, regular Entity-wide communication and training will ensure a … ive impact of the Entity's use of AI. This statement was prepared on 17 April 20256. In accordance with the Policy, it will be updated at least annually …

# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The CGC follows the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) which provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officialsility), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/list-of-transparency-statements). This page provides details of the CGC’s implementation of these policy requirements. ### Accountable Officials The CGC has designated the Chief Operating Officer as the accountable official for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the agency. ### Intentions Behind AI Adoption The CGC’s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies), the [National AI Plan(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [APS AI Plan 2025(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). ### Key roles The CGC has designated the Chief Operating Officer as the accountable official for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the agency. Accountable Officials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at the CGC. ### AI Adoption The CGC's endorsed AI applications are used internally to support workplace productivity, … ocesses, and increase operational efficiency. ### Public Interaction with AI The CGC does notand impact The CGC is committed to ensuring that its use of AI in ways that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. ### Monitoring Effectiveness We have established robust processes, including regular reviews, audits, and staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. These operate in tandem with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards and common procedures ins responsible, environmentally considerate, and in the public interest. The CGC does not currently use any AI systems that directly interact with the public or make decisions that affect individuals without human oversight. ### Governance Appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the CGC. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff and is mandatory under the APS AI plan. As a prerequisite to utilising AI tools, staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. The CGC complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). ### Training and Governance Impacted staff will have access to training that aligns with the responsible and acceptable use of AI policies, and appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the CGC. ### Protecting Against Negative Impacts We have established robust processes and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. Our efforts are aligned with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards, and common procedures as outlined in the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). The use of publicly available AI services is governed by the Department of Treasury'sThe CGC have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. The use of AI is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy and, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ### Compliance with Legislation The CGC complies with all applicable legislation and regulations. We are committed to maintaining transparency and accountability in our AI practices through the AI Transparency Statement. ### Update Frequency This transparency statement is reviewed and updated annually or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was made in March 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Operating Officer at …

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement ## Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) simulates human intelligence processes and can enhance functionality in standalone applications or alongside existing ones. Introduction ACIAR’s commitment to the safe, ethical, responsible and legal use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia, through international agricultural research partnerships. ACIAR uses the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition](https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html) of AI, as ‘a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ ## Background While AI offers numerous opportunities, it also introduces new risks t … ul management. This Statement outlines our approach to AI use within ACIAR, in accordance with the DTA's [pustralian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), in accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible AIuse of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government 2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). This policy applies to all ACIAR staff, contractors and service providers, noting AI is not used for decision-making purposes at ACIAR. ## Policy AI technologies will be adopted only after a thorough risk assessment and monitored for compliance. Official information must not be entered into public AI services unless already public. Email accounts cannot be used with public AI services without approval. Commercial AI tools require executive approval, and any AI-produced content must be reviewed before publication. Automated decision-making tools need significant risk assessai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability), setting a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. This policy applies to all ACIAR staff, contractors and service providers and also aligns with the [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Staff guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai). ## Our Approach to AI Adoption Currently, ACIAR primarily employs Microsoft Copilot as its enterprise AI tool. It assists staff by drafting and summarising documents, and approval. AI tools must not access restricted information, perform illegal activities, or assess staff performance. Misuse or risks identified must be reported immediately. Administrative decisions aided by AI will be clearly indicated. ## AI applicaalysing substantial volumes of text-based information, improving search capabilities and knowledge discovery, and supporting various administrative and corporate functions. Currently, ACIAR primarily employs Microsoft's Copilot as its AI tool. Copilot facilitates staff in various activities by leveraging AI capabilitieACIAR’s current AI use falls into the following ways: - **Automation and Efficiency -** Copilot automatescategories: - **Efficiency Through Automation** : Copilot helps streamline repetitive tasks, such as meeting transcriptions, minunote-taking, email searching and data sorting, thereby enabling staff to concentrate on more complex and value-added aganisation, increasing efficiency and productivitiesy. - **OffiEnhanced Productivity -** : Copilot enhances textual interpretation and geneassists with draftion by understanding and responding in natural language. This includesng, document structuring docum, and contents, summarising written material and assisting with drafting contentation, creating a more efficient and effective workflow. - **Collaboration -** : Copilot aids insupports real-time collaboration by providing suggestions and insights during document creation, ensuring consistency and improving the overall quality of the work produced. By utilising Copilot, ACIAR aims to enhance operational efficiency, improve productivity and support collaborative efforts, while maintaining a high standard of quality and accuracy. ## Monitoring and governance Bias cteamwork, providing insights and suggestions that promote consistency and quality across projects. We maintain a culture of responsible AI use through regular staff communications and ongoing training. AI systems used by ACIAR do not make automated decisions that directly affect the public, funding recipients or program beneficiaries. ## Governance, Risk Management and Assurance ACIAR uses DTA’s [AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) to review the impact of AI use. In governing the use of AI, ACIAR also adheres to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as the DTA's: - [Technical stan darise from data selection or software models, leading to skewed results. AI might produce false information and/or result with privacy risks. It may also provide outdated or inaccurate data and could diminish individual creativity, resulting in homogenised content. Monitoring and governance of AI systems are crucial to mitigate the risks associated with bias, false information and privacy concerns. Establishing robust frameworks that include continuous monitoring, regular audits and compliance with establishedd for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-technical-standard) - [AI Impact Assessment Tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) - [Guidance on AI procurement in government](https://www.buyict.gov.au/public/en/buyers?id=public_content_navigation&topic_id=09f5d0e81b762a50f421db96b04bcb94) - [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve) - Other applicable internal policies and governance frameworks. ## Privacy and Security ACIAR complies with all applicable laws, including the Privacy Act 1988. Personal information is minimised, anonymised, and protected with strong security measures. Security considerations in relation to the use of AI are consistent with relevant cyber security strategies, including [Essential Eight](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-frameworks/essential-eight) strategies to mitigating cyber security incidents, the updated [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/), and relevant policies can help ensure the ethical and responsible use of AI. Transparency in data sources, algorithmic accountability and stakeholder involvement are key components of effective governance. By implementing these measures, we can foster trust and integrity in AI applicd legislations of impacted jurisdictions. All AI-generated outputs are reviewed by ACIAR staff before being used in official documents, communications, or decisions. AI tools are used to support staff productivity and do not replace human judgement. ACIAR staff remain responsible for all final decisions and advice. ## Ethical and Legal Compliance ACIAR’s AI practices reflect Australia’s eight AI Ethics Principles and adhere to all relevant laws and regulations, ensurincluding they deliver accurate, reliable and fair outcomes. ACIAR acknowledges the rapid evolution of AI technology and commits to continuous monitoring to ensure that policies, tools and their usage remain current. Internal governance mechanisms will be employed to Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and the Australian Public Service Code of Conduct. Our commitment to fairness, transparency and accountability underpins all governance oversee the use developments. ## Compliance We will use the DTA’s [AI assurance frameworkof AI at ACIAR. ## Contact For more information on AI use at ACIAR, please [contact us](https://www.digitalaciar.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) to review the impact of AI on ACIAR’s strategic footprint. ACIAR will also adhere to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as the DTA's [policy for responsible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)form/contact-us?__cf_chl_tk=rtzp3EzVzOGvTQJ1zurnQ9WboFZpeMff0A4ij.IwtdI-1773285403-1.0.1.1-ZxD_d3yobBDllExQ2f1MSpNu01dtBlJN6V9z9R.iWrE). ## Review and updates The first version of this Statement was published in March 2025, followed by an annual update published in March 2026. This Statement will be reviewed annually, or when there are significant changes to ACIAR’s use of AI technologies. [ ACIAR Statement on the Responsible Use of AI.pdf 723 367.39 KB - pdf ](https://www.aciar.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-043/ACIAR%20-Statement%20on%20the%20Responsible%20Use%20of%20-on-the-Responsible-Use-of-AI.pdf) [Accountability](https://www.aciar.gov.au/search?search_api_f …

… AI, we use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)](https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html) (OECD) definition: > "A machine-based system that, for explicit or implici … delivery of innovative and expert advice to the Australian Government, grounded in evidence and science. We classify our use of AI and rela … individual responsibilities when accessing publicly available tools. ### AI in recruitment trial We are undertaking a limited, opt-in trial of AI in recruitment. AI will be used to support comparison and evaluation of recruitment processes, alongside standard human assessment for this process. We do not use AI to make selection decisions about candidates. All decisions to shortlist, assess or select candidates are made by a human selection panel, consistent with APS merit based recruitment principles. Results and outcomes of the trial will be explored once the recruitment process is completed. We continue exploring applications of AI to support our vision, purpos … management, the administration of legislation and regulation. We will continue to update this statement as ourits use of AI changes. ## Public interaction and impact We are committe … r. When completing the register, business owners ensure AI solutions areis implemented safely and responsibly. This includes completing risk ass … .gov.au/sp?id=buyer&kb=KB0011755). To support AI risk mitigation, we willhave finalised our AI Risk Appetite Guidelines which sit alongside tools supporting … sparency Statement review and updates We last updated this statement Februaryin April 2026. We will review and update it if our approach to or use of AI changes, and at least every 12 months, in line with policy requirements.

- [Home](https://www.asqa.gov.au/) - [About us](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us) - [Reporting and accountability](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability) - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement The Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) is committed to ensurin … icable Commonwealth laws and policies, such as requirements under the \[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI in %20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government %20v1.1.pdf) and the [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.p … A's use of AI, please contact us at [digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au ](mailto:digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au) ## Review and updates Share \_\_\_\_\_\_[\_\_](mailto:?subject=ASQA%20website&body= "Social link email") \_\_PrintOn this page

… ficial under the policy is the Chief Information Officer (CIO). - The CTribunal's Chief AI Officer under the policy is the Chief Data and AI Officer (CDAIO). - The CIO and CDAIO engages with the Senior Management Committee and Principal Registrar/CEO unde … gement Framework overseen by the Tribunal Audit and Risk Committee. - tThe Senior Management Committee is actively involved when reviewing any …

… work, support the processing of large volumes of data and information, and reduce time spent on routine tasks. Staff must review outputs for qua …

… ReadSpeaker") # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement TLearn how the dDepartment of Education uses Aartificial Iintelligence (AI) in asafely and responsible and transparent way that upholds citizens’ personal privacy and rights and assesses the value of AI uses in an ethical and transparent manner, while keeping people at the centre of how we work. We aim to use AI within the department in ways that improve operational efficiency and assist the department in meeting its mission to ensure access to quality education for all Australians. ## On this page: ## Why and how does the department use Ay to improve services, inform policy, and support quality education. ## On this page: The Department of Education recognises the opportunities artificial Iintelligence (AI)? Currently, the primary use of AI within the departm present is through the Microsoft Copilot tool that is available in Microsoft digital products. Key examples of what this means in practice are: Productivity and Enabling| Information Analytics and Insight| Policy and Legal\ ---|---|--- - Sorting high volumes of stakeholder communication - Improving search and sorting processes related to file management | - Assisting helpdesks roles to sort through large amounts of case information - Organising large volumes of held information related to educational institutions | - Using AI to review information around policies relevant to the department's core focuses - Using AI to assist with legal review where large amounts of case materials exist ## Governance, management, and transparency We are foco transform the way we work and how we deliver our services. We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently to support our mission to ensure all Australians can access quality education. Our use of AI is considered and purposeful. We are maturing our understanding and use through trialling and experimentation to better inform our policy development, unlock internal efficiencies and uplift our capabilities. Our used on establf AI ish ing an AI governance regime that ensures AI serves our strategic objectives and those of the government. We have appointed accountable officials for AI and we are establishing appropriate review structures for new uses of AI. These will monitor use cases to ensure ethical uses of AI and alignment of AI and data governance to ensure that the way collected data is used by AI tools does not differ from stated collection purposes. The department also maintains clear communication with its IT partner provider, the Department of Employment and Workplace Relformed by and aligned with the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service and the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government. The department is developing its own AI Strategy and Roadmap for the coming 12 – 18 month period. We also have our own internal AI Guidelines to help staff understand their responsibilities and obligations when using AI in the workplace. ## AI Accountable Officer and Chief AI Officer The Department of Education’s (DEWR) to ensure thatuse of AI gis overnance and approaches are aligned. The use of AI in the department is periodically re-examined and reviewed in the Department’s Audit and Risk committee. In extraordinary circumstanceseen by our AI Accountable Officers. The AI Accountable Officers: - are the primary contacts for if there are rapidly emerging risks around AI deployment, committee members can require out-of-session reviews or an extraordinary session of the committee to deal with these risks. In addition to monitoring developing AI risks, the Audit and Risk committee and the department’s Digital Services team will ensure that the use of AI within the department is effective, measurable and sustained and complies with all relevant government cybersecurity standards. The departwhole‑of‑government AI assurance and coordination, and keep staff informed of AI policy obligations and changes. - are accountable for implementing AI policy within the agency, including governance frameworks, transparency statement is also developing an AI use case register, as recommended by the Commonwealth [Policy for the Responsible use of AI](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/policy/responsible-use-of-ai-in-government). The department has appointed two Accountable Officers for the use of AI. Theynd internal registers - oversee AI risk assessments and ensure appropriate controls are in place, The departments AI Accountable Officers are: **- Kerryn Kovacevic, Chief Information Officer** **Hamish McDonald,** ** - Matthew Johnston, First Assistant Secretary, Strategy, Data and Measurement** The department will periodically review other measures, including these governance arrangements and this transparency statement, to ensure that the department remains compliant with all requirements for the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai). ## What we won’t use AI for The department currently does not allow AI for fully automated outpus Chief AI Officer is responsible for driving value, adoption and cultural change through AI. The departments Chief AI Officer will be in place by June 2026. ## Governance and transparency The department is maturing its AI governance arrangements. Existing governance arrangements such as the departments Audit and Risk Committee receive regular updates and review of AI usage, tooling, training and compliance. The departments AI Transparency Statement and internal AI guidance are regularly reviewed and updated to reflect procgresses, interaction with the public or in conjunction with other automated decision or changes and comply with Australian Government policy. The department making (ADM) programs. This means that AI outputs will be reviewed by a staff member with the experience to know if outputs are appropriate (i.e. human-in-the-loop), the public will not interact with a chatbot or similar agent when contacting us, and automated decision making will not be combined witains an AI use case register and has clear guidance on approved tools and record keeping requirements in line with the Archives Act 1983. The department has approved the use of Microsoft Copilot and made Copilot Chat available to all staff. All staff are required to complete the ADM programs which are already understood as potentially higher risk to the public due to large scale or high volume of output. ## Compliance with relevant laws and regulations While enabling the use of AI as part of a general strategy to promote innovation in ways of working, the department acts in line with all relevant pieces of legislation and regulation that govern the information that it manages and appropriate uses of that information. This includes: - the [Privacy Act (1988)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/2019-08-13/text) - [Public Governance, PerformanceI in Government Fundamentals training developed by the Australian Public Service Commission every 12 months. ## Why and how does the department use Artificial Intelligence (AI)? The Department of Education is primarily using AI to improve internal efficiency. Staff are encouraged to use AI to draft, summarise and refine their work, support the processing of large volumes of data and information reduce time spent on routine tasks. Staff must review outputs for quality and Aaccountability Act (2013)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00123/latest/text) - [Australian Public Service Code of Conduct](https://www.apsc.gov.au/publication/aps-values-and-code-conduct-practice) - [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/policy/responsible-use-of-ai-in-government) This transparency statement will be annually reviewed and re-released with relevant updatesuracy. To minimise risk and safeguard the public, the Department of Education **does not** use AI for automated decision-making. All decisions **are made by staff** , ensuring human oversight and accountability. ## Review and Updates This statement is reviewed annually, or sooner if there are significant changes to how the Department uses AI. ## Contact Information For inquiries regarding the department’s use of AI, please [contact [digitalservices@education.gov.au](mailto:digitalservices@education.gov.auus](https://www.education.gov.au/about-department/contact-us#toc-online-contact-form).

… 012%20-%20Files%20Created%20January%20to%20June%202023.pdf) ## Audit and Risk Committee The IGIS Audit and Risk Committee is established in accordance with the PGPA Act. The Audit and Risk Committee’s role is to provide independent assurance and advice to the … More information about the membership and functions of the IGIS Audit and Risk Committee is available in the [IGIS Audit and Risk Committee Charter](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20246-054/IGIS%20Audit%20and%20Risk%20Committee%20Charter%20-%2020246.pdf) and the [annual report](https://www.igis.gov.au/resources/public …

… # Review and updates This AI Transparency Statement was published on 27 February10 April 20256 and will be reviewed and updated annually and/or when significant cha …

# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February7 April 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebo … nd responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adhereligns to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrailGuidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability requirements and explain whatpractices for developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use …

# AIrtificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency policy for …

… (mailto:tads.helpdesk@gbrmpa.gov.au). ### AI Transparency Statement The Reef Authority's AI Transparency Statement was last updated in November 2025. In line with the \[Policy for responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI in government v1.1.pdf) this AI Transparency Statement will be updated if the Reef Authority's approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. Created Tue, 2025-02-25 11:21 Updated 20 Nov 2025

# AI transparency statement Page last updated:3 March 2025 [Home](https://www.ga.gov.au/home) [Geoscience Australia](https://www. …

… we make a significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. Last updated: 3 February 2026 You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. ## How useful was this page?\* Star rating Do you have any comments? Note: your comments are anonymous. We use them to improve the website. Do not include any personal details.\ [Contact us](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us) or [find legal help](https://www.fwc.gov.au/simple-page/where-find-legal-help) if you need a response.

… alservices@education.gov.au](mailto:digitalservices@education.gov.au). **This statement was last updated 30/09/2025.**

… nquiries-and-feedback). DSS3370 | Permalink: www.dss.gov.au/node/3370 Last modified 20 January 2026.

… he Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official.  ### [ AI team ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-team?language=en … the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/about-the-department) **Is there anything wrong with this page?** ## Help us improve health.gov.au If you would like a response please provide an email address. Your email address is covered by our [privacy policy](https://www.health.gov.au/node/6186). Email address What you were doing? (mandatory) What went wrong? (mandatory) Leave this field blank

Skip to page navigation # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Last updated: 19 February 2026 This page explains how we are using Artificial Intelligence, in line w …

Share this page: Share to Print Print \[Share to Email Email \](mailto:?subject=Comcare%20|%20Information%20on%20AI Transparency Statement&body=Visit%20Comcare%20to%20find%20about%20AI%20Transparency%20Statement%20-%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.comcare.gov.au%2Fabout%2Fforms-pubs%2Fdocs%2Fpubs%2Fcorporate-publications%2Fai-transparency-statement) [Corporate publications](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications) - [Annual Report 2018–19 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-18-19-portal) - [Annual Report 2019–20 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-19-20-portal) - [Annual Report 2020–21 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-2020-21-portal) - [Annual Report 2023-24 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-2023-24-transparency-portal-publication) - [Overpayments (Claims) – Guiding principles](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/overpayments-policy) - [AI Transparency Statement](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/ai-transparency-statement) - [Cybersecurity Strategy](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/cyber-security-strategy) # AI Transparency Statement _________________________________________ … ______________ Comcare acknowledges the Digital Transformation Agency’'s [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in g … ty, privacy, and risk management frameworks - alignment with Australia’'s Voluntary AI Safety Standard and AI Ethics Principles - mandatory st … in February 2025 and will be reviewed annually, or earlier if Comcare’'s adoption of AI changes. ## Contact us Comcare’'s Chief Information Office is designated as the accountable official u … /about/contact/contact-us) page of this website. Page last reviewed: 04 September 2025 You might also be interested in**20 days ago**

Skip to content or footer Search search ## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition o …

… te attempts at commercial engagement via this account will be ignored. Date last updated: 2 January 2026.

… r email [help@digitalhealth.gov.au](mailto:help@digitalhealth.gov.au). Date last updated: 28 February 2025

Search ABS [Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transpa …

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement ReleasUpdated 024 / 024 / 20256 This statement is published in accordance with requirements set out … tion relevant to government’s use of AI including those relating to: - the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct - data governance - privacy - cyber security - the APS Values and Code of Conduct. ## How we use AI In accordance with the [_DTA Classification syste … to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or intervention. In 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We continue to make this available to all staff. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or interventionhave also made a licensed version of ChatGPT available to a number of staff, primarily in research focussed areas. ## Governance processes We maintain an internal policy on the use … nd used in our Data Technology (DT) environment. It also requires all AI users to be open and transparent about their use of AI and to carefully review all outputs for accuracy and quality. When submitting work for review or approval, users must, where applicable, describe the purpose(s) for which AI tools were used and confirm that all AI generated outputs relied upon have been carefully reviewed for accuracy, quality and appropriateness. Completion of training in the appropriate use of AI is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC. ## Compliance We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legi … e use of AI changes significantly, and at least every twelve months. ## Version history **Date********Note****** 24 February 2025 Initial version 31 March 2026 Review and amended to align with updated DTA policy ## Contact us If you have any questions about this statement please contact [ai@pc.gov.au](mailto:ai@pc.gov.au).

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 12 April 2026 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Gover … ernment and has designated an AI Accountable Official (October 2024). The designation ofDVA has appointed a Chief AI Officer is currently being formalised. For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our …

… autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## Introduction ARPANSA is committed to theworks to protection of Australia, the health and safety of its people,ns and the environment from the harmful effects of radiation. Delivering on our role includes the responsibl by promoting safe, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance our research, services and operations. The agency recognises this is a rapidly evolving technology; this statement covers our approach and consideration of AI and how we will go about ensuring its safe and responsible use. We are committed to adapting our use and capabilities as the technology, environment and policy requirements evolve. ## Purpose of AI use AI may be used across various corporate and enabling functions to enhance workplace productivity by streamlining workflows, automating routine tasks, providing analytics and intelligent data insights. It is used by select staff in their routine digital daily activities and to provide accessibility support. AI may also be used to support service delivery in in its operations. This transparency statement describes ARPANSA’s approach to AI, following DTA guidelines for responsible government use and transparency. ## Why we use AI ARPANSA uses AI to support the delivery of high‑quality scientific advice, internal corporate operations, and regulatory assurance. AI helps staff perform routine or complex tasks more efficiently, enabling grelation to compliance and assurance. ### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI to improve workplace productivity for all staff including: - streamlining staff accessibility and understanding of policies and entitlements - improving accessibility to assist staff in using platforms, applications, and services - improving the uptake of features in existing products and services - providing specialised just in time eduer focus on mission‑critical work that protects the community from radiation risks. ## How we use AI ARPANSA’s current use of AI aligns with the [DTA classification system](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification) for staff - assisting in summarising content such as documents, emails and other content - enabling the transcription and dynamic review of interviews and meeting notes - supporting rapid prototyping of training and education materials for agency staff.AI use in the following ways: ### Usage patterns: - Workplace productivity - Analytics for insights - Decision-support/administrative processes - Innovation and process improvement. ### Domains: - Corporate and Enabling ### Public interaction ARPANSA’s use of AI does not involve and impact ARPANSA does not use AI in any way that directly interactions with the public or pose any significant impact to individuals. AI is not used as part of automated decision making with respect to individuals and the agency commits to being clear if AI becomes members of the public. No AI system is used to make automated decisions about individuals, or to generate outcomes that could significantly imparct of a decision-making process. ## Monitoring and governance ### Responsible AI usage policy The agency will maintain an internal responsible AI usage policy that aligns with advice and guidance provided by the DTA, Australian Public Service Commission and other relevant agencies for using AI services responsibly. ### Measure and monitorindividuals without human review. ## Monitoring AI effectiveness and impacts ARPANSA monitors AI use and applications to ensure ongoing safety, transparency and ethical operation. ARPANSA continually strengthens its AI governance in concert with our broader cyber security, data, digital and technical governance frameworks to ensure all AI use remains safe, ethical and well‑aligned with whole‑of‑agency risk settings. ARPANSA has established governance and oversight mechanisms to support ethical and effective use of AI including: #### Training The agency will provide all staff with training and education in general AI knowledge and where relevant to specific AI tools as well as on-demand support. Staff complete mandatory training when accessing AI tools and have continued access to training on the proper use of AI services. #### Support The agency will provide internal support and information for staff and managers on the use of AI. All Staff are provided the means to report concerns or queries to the Digital Technology Team through the provision of feedback session, surveys, and service requests. #### Monitoring The agency acknowledges AI carries with it emerging risks and will continue to establish oversight and governance frameworks and processes to monitor the effectiveness, risk and ethical use of our AI systems. ## Compliance Our AI practices will comply with the mandatory requirements of the Australian Government's P- An AI Governance Working Group - Communities of Practice and internal AI specialists - CIO and CISO oversight #### Training and capability All staff who access AI tools must complete the AI Fundamentals mandatory training. We are committed to building staff capability, including digital capability required at all levels of the agency. We offer AI training, education and support and provide opportunities to enable our workforce to develop their skills and knowledge. Training needs will be assessed as ARPANSA’s use of AI evolves. #### Compliance ARPANSA complies with the DTA policies, standards, legislation, privacy and security frameworks. The DTA requirements are regularly reviewed by the AI Working Group and Accountable Official. This statement was last updated in March 2026. In line with the policy for the [Responsible Use of AI in Government. We ensure that our AI systems are in accordance with all applicable laws and guidelines. This includes regular reviews and audits to maintain compliance with relevant legislation and regulations, and continuous improvement process](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), our statement will be reviewed at least annually and updated if our approach to and use of AI changes. #### Accountable official ARPANSA'sThe Chief Information Officer was designated as the aARPANSA’s Accountable oOfficial for AI on 11 November 2024. ### AI transparency statement The AI transparency statement was first published to our website on 14 February 2025. ## ARPANSA AI Contact Information For further inquiries about our AI use, please contact us at [ai@arpansa.gov.au](mailto:ai@arpansa.gov.au Contact For questions about this statement please submit an enquiry via our [online contact form. ](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/contact-us/contact-us-form) [![Access to information](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/sites/default/ …

… ity Act 2013_](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00123/latest/text) (PGPA ACTct), and therefore must comply with all requirements outlined in the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Transparency Statement The ARC is committed to enscapturing that the internal usee opportunity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is appropriate, responsible and ethical. The ARC embraces the opportunity for all its personnel to use AI as a complementary tool for internal purposes, however the appropriate, responsible and ethical use of AI will always be the highest priority. The ARC complies with the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), and other relevant guidance regarding government standards of AI useacross the organisation, while ensuring that the use of AI is appropriate, responsible and ethical. The ARC complies with the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), and other relevant guidance regarding government standards of AI use. The ARC has a separate policy to outline its expectations for the use of [_AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors_](https://www.arc.gov.au/node/11917 "Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the ARC's grant programs"). To ensure the appropriate, responsible and ethical application of AI used internally within the agency, the ARC’s approach is to: - Implement an internal AI acceptable use policy for all personnel to follow. This policy will be reviewed annually (at a minimum) to ensure the ARC continues to align with best practices and government standards and keep pace with developments in AI technology. - Release a strategic position on AI adoption within the organisation to guide and empower ARC personnel to engage with AI through an aligned vision. - Continue to provide mandatory, and develop further, training on AI to all personnel. - Introduce an internal prioritisation process to consider new AI projects to ensure they align with the appropriate, responsible and ethical use of AI. - Maintain a register of AI use cases within the ARC and assign accountable use case owners to monitor and record the internal use of AI within the agency. - Mana … ent Framework, including reporting to the ARC Audit and Risk Committee and Digital Transformation Agency. The ARC’s current use of AI within the agency is in its early stages, with a few applications of AI currently being piloted within some business ar … d potential applications of AI used internally within the ARC (as of 28 February6 March 20256). **Usage 1** | **Domain 2** | **| Domain | ARC current or potential use**\ ---|---|---\ **Analytics for insights** Identifies, produces or unde … g tools. | Corporate and Enabling | The use of advanced AI techniques areis planned for development to inform policy developmentsettings and where required, provide insights to the ARC’s stakeholders. Any internally developed models or the use of external models will be considered through the internal prioritisation process, have appropriate evaluation methods applied, and the results will be … .\ **Workplace productivity** Automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication. | Corporate and Enabling | The ARC is trialling the use of Microsoft CoPilot 365 to automateutilises Microsoft CoPilot 365 Enterprise to provide real-time transcription in meetings, summarise key discussion points and assist within administrative tasks. For example, composing an initial draft of minutes and action items, with human review in advance of human review. The ARC will consider how AI may be used to improve grant administration and assist with coding for internal systems. Any implementation will be consistent with the principles of being appropriate, responsible and ethical, have appropriate risk management practices in place, and ensure there is human oversight.\ **Decision making and administrative action** Support decision maki … e administrative action without human intervention. | Policy and Legal[1] | The use of AI to informARC may consider how AI can support administrative decision -making and administrative action is not currently applied within the ARC. [[1]](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) As per the DTA’s [_Classification system for AI use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) _._processes in grants administration. Any implementation will be consistent with the principles of being appropriate, responsible and ethical, have appropriate risk management practices in place, and ensure there is human oversight.\ **Image processing** Processes images to automatically identify patterns and objects, such as faces, for official purposes. | Nil | The usage of image processing is not applied within the ARC, nor are there any appropriate applications currently identified for potential use of this technology within the ARC. ### Chief AI Officer Anthony Murfett, Deputy Chief Executive Officer Australian Research Council ### Accountable Official Bobby Almasi, Chief Information Officer Australian Research Council Phone: 02 6206 7226 [**cio@arc.gov.au](mailto:cio@arc.gov.au) ### ARC Communications Phone: 02 6287 6600 [communications@arc.gov.au**](mailto:ciommunications@arc.gov.au) Level 4 West, 47 Bowes Street Phillip ACT 2606 GPO Box 2702, Canberra ACT 2601 This AI transparency statement was first published in April 2025 and updated in March 2026. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when significant change is made to the ARC’s approach to AI.

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 9 February1 April 2026 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance … has access to publicly available information - Semantic Text Analysis (an advanced form of key word matching) to interpret unstructured MyService text responses provided by DVA clients when submitting claims, with staff a … or personal data and does not make decisions or recommendations. DVA is developinghas commenced a trial of a voluntary, consent based, Proof of Concept Claims Docume … type document reader has been built by DVA within the GovAI Platform. A proposedThe trial will uses a clear consent model to ensure trial participants who volunteer to p … ation. The trial will test the suitability of the tool to assist staff in processing claims. The tool does not make decisions or determine claim outcomes. Claims …

Search DHA # ArtifOur commitment to the safe, ethicial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement ## **Introduction** Defence Housing Australia, responsible and legal use of AI supports our vision to deliver better health and wellbeing for all Australians, now and for future generations. We are aligning with the whole of government approach to AI. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DHTA) is committed to the ethical[Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance our services and operations while ensuring transparency, accountability, and the protection of privacy. This AI Transparency Statement outlines DHA’s approach to integrating AI technologies and how DHA will prioritise fairness, security, and transparency in all AI-driven initiatives. ## **Initiatives** DHA recogniin government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability) 2.0 sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI, along with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan), [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). We identify, assess the unique characteristics of AI systems means traditional governance approaches may not be appropriate. Therefore, DHA has committed to an AI Program of work to lay the foundations for AI readiness, compliance and benefits realisation. DHA’s AI Initiatives will focus on continued imprand manage AI use case impacts and risks informed by [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction "https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction"). ## Why we use AI Our adoption of AI will improve: - service delivery - policy outcomes - efficiency - productivity. Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Governments to our customers’ experience, through data driven decisions, remaining human centred and staying connected, coordinated and committed as we navigate the continually changing AI landscape. ### 1. Purpose of AI Use DHA will continue to investigate how AI can be used to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and support the effective delivery of housing solutions to Defence personnel Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. ## How we use AI From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We have made Copilot Chat available to all staff and are rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot licenced version to staff in phases. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, our staff must complete [AI fundamentals training](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-training) that includes responsible and acceptable use of AI. We also require users to acknowledge safe, responsible and etheir families. AI systems will be designed to complement human decision-making, ensuring better outcomes for our stakeholders. **Usage patterns** Iical use of AI before accessing and using generative AI tools. We restrict the use of AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, to certain approved use cases in our use case register. We use [generative and narrow AI models](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption/mitigating-risks-and-harms) in line with the DTA c’s [Classification system, DHA's AI use falls primarily within: - workplace productivity - analytics for insights. These uses support internal corporate and enabling functions such as information management, reporting and operational analysis. DHA does not currentlys for use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). ### What we use AI for We can use AI to: - analyse data to gain insights - automate activities to make tasks more efficient and increase workplace productivity - identify patterns and objects automatically - support decision making by helping staff summarise, analyse or synthesise information used to prepare advice or recommendations considered by our committees or decision makers. We do not use AI forto automated decision‑making or administrative action without human oversight. **Domains** DHA’s AI use applies to the following domain: - corporate and enabling. AI is used internally to support functions such as ICT, communications and data analysis. It is not used for direct public service delivery or regulatory decision‑making. ### 2. Transparency and Communication DHA strives to ensure that our stakeholders are fully informed about the role of AI in our processes. At present, DHA does not use AI in decision‑making processes. If this changes in the future, we will clearly communicate when AI is used in a way that could reasonably be expected to significantly affect the rights or interests of DHA’s employees, customers, partners, or the broader community. ### 3. Ethical Use of AI DHA is committed to the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies. We will adhere to strict ethical principles that emphasise fairness, non-discrimination, and ths. Human officials remain fully accountable for the advice and recommendations they provide. ### Where we use AI We can use AI in these areas: - policy and legal - scientific - compliance and fraud detection - corporate and enabling - service delivery. ## Our approach with AI We set up an Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee (AISc) to guide our approach to AI. The AISc advises the Digital Committee which oversees our digital, data and ICT functions and capabilities and includes senior executive members from across the department. The AISc considers: - the application of AI within the Health portfolio’s policy and program context - the use and regulation of AI in the health, disability and aged care sectors - the use of AI within the department - the whole of government approach to AI and the intersection with health, disability and aged care sectors. Our staff will be able to explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI. We havoidance of bias in all AI-driven activities. We will continuously monitor and audit AI models to ensure they operate in line with these principles. DHA will be guided by the Australian Government’s, "Australia's AI Ethics Principles". ### 4. Privacy and Data Protection The use of AI at DHA will comply with Australian e an AI assurance framework in place. We also keep an internal register of AI use cases, in line with the whole-of-government approach. This register helps us see where AI is being used and monitor its usage properly. We have measures in place to: - make sure AI is well governed and managed. Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information without appriovacy laws and regulations. DHA takes the protection of personal information seriously and will ensure that AI systems are designed with privacy and personal information security at their core. DHA has blocked DeepSeek AI to meetl through our assurance and governance processes - make AI use across the department visible, so we can govern it effectively and manage risks, assurance and reporting - encourage staff to use AI safely, responsibly, ethically and lawfully through corporate communications and training - support collaboration across the Ddepartment of Home Affairs Protective Security Policy Framework compliance. ### 5. Accountability and Oversight DHA will be guided by the Digital Transformation Agency Policy for responsible use of AI in government and the National framework for the assurance of AI in government. In addition, DHA will classify AI use according to [DTA's Classification System](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). DHA will maintain robust oversight of all AI systems, ensuring that there is a clear line of accountability and decisions made by AI. Risk based monitoring and reporting will be applied toand with other government agencies on AI use, including developing shared resources to ensure safe, responsible, ethical and lawful use. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI in a safe, ethical, responsible and lawful way for the benefit of Australians. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable: - laws - frameworks - policies - best practice. We remain committed to transparency and protecting the public. We will be transparent as we responsibly adopt evolving AI technology and policy requirements. ## Safe and responsible AI adoption We are developing internal AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DHTA’s AI applications. ### 6. Stakeholder Engagement and Feedback DHA recognises the importance of ongoing dialogue with our stakeholders, including defence personnel, their familpolicy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. This includes our role in grants, procurement, regulation and policy making related to AI. We will leverage whole-of-government policies, and the wider community. DHA will provide accessible channels for feedback on the use of AI technologies and will take appropriate action to address concerns or suggestions. ### 7. Continuous Improvement DHA is committed to continually improving our AI practices by investing in new technologies, training, and partnerships. DHA will adapt to emerging trends and best practdevelop internal policies and guidance materials when necessary for: - AI Governance and approval processes - acceptable use of AI in the department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - record keeping - security - procurement of AI systems - risk mitigation and technical guardrails - roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internal policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. We will update this transparency statement as we continue to develop policies ion using AI to ensure our systems remain transparent, effective, andAI usage and to implement AI technology. We will continuously review our use of AI to: - protect the public against negative impacts - reflect the pace of technological change - manage the evolving risk environment - aligned with our strategic objectives. By following these principles, DHA will ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and transparently, fostering trust and accountability with all stakeholders. ______________________________________________________________________ Published 4 February 2026 Back to topwhole-of-government guidance. ## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official. ### [ AI team ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-team?language=en) Contact us for questions about our AI transparency statement, our use of AI, or to report AI safety concerns, including AI-related incidents. [AI@health.gov.au](mailto:AI@health.gov.au) Date last updated: 16 February 2026 Tags: - [About the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/about-the-department)

CM. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIAL AI transparency statement This statement provides details of how the Royal Australian Mint (the Mint) uses AI, as directed by the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government. An officer has been identified who will be the point of contact for the implementation of the Policy for Reasonable use of AI in Government at the Mint. The officer, and any other individuals participating in the implementation of the Policy have received fundamentals training in AI as a minimum. How the Mint uses AI As per the classification system for AI use, the Mint uses AI in the domain of Corporate and enabling, and the ufollowing usage patterns and domains: Usage patterns of • Workplace Productivity and • Image Processing. Domains • Corporate and enabling • Service Delivery • Compliance and fraud detection • Policy and legal In the use of Image Processing, the Mint uses basic shape recognition for identifying humans. The Mint does not identify individuals via facial recognition or any other biometric markers. At this time, the Mint does not use AI in a way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. The Mint’s use of AI is for the development of internal documentation, including research and drafting. As a part of its commitment to responsible use of AI, including ensuring accountability for accuracy and decision making, Mint employees review all AI outputs. This is known as Human-in-the-loop (HITL). The Mint understands the use of AI must be based on Australia’s AI Ethics Principals:  • human, societal and environmental wellbeing  • human-centered values  • fairness  • privacy protection and security  • reliability and safety  • transparency and explainability  • contestability  • accountability. OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2 The Mint is committed to applying the cyber security requirements outlined in the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM) and the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF), using a risk-based approach to ensure the secure operations of all AI applications. The AI space is evolving, and as such the Mint will continue to monitor and evaluate its current and potential future approach to AI use. The Mint will ensure integration with the whole of government approach to AI adoption, participating in AI forums and processes where applicable. To this end, this statement will be updated as required to describe what AI will be used for, and what it will not be used for. OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2 This review will be conducted annually, or when there is change to how AI is used at the Mint. Controlled content information Controlled by John Cock, CISO Date of effect 625 March 2025 6 Approved by Emily Martin, A/g CEO Document no. D25/8915 CM container 25/347 Contact Melinda Hodges

# AUSTRAC Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ## On this page - Introduction - How we use AI - Usage patterns and d … rac.gov.au/contact-us/form). This guidance sets out how we interpret the Actcertain Australian legislation, along with associated Rules and regulations. Australian courts are u … t be taken into account when determining how the law applies to you. Page ID: 1173 ## Was this page helpful?

… erned, monitored and benefits are realised, including compliance with eachapplicable Commonwealth laws and policies, such as requirements under the \[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](http … nsive data analysis. ASQA does not currently employ AI capability in service deliverypublic-facing services, including our regulatory functions or decision-making processes. Whi … ted by AI systems, in order to maintain accountability and accuracy. As ASQA deploys public-facing AI capability it will ensure its data and AI governance practices include privacy, ethics, and security assessments that aim to protect the public against any negative impacts of AI. In coming years, ASQA plans to leverage AI technologies as part of its … ransformation@asqa.gov.au](mailto:digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au) ## Review and updates This AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 28 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Was this page helpful? Yes No Please add your comments: CAPTCHA Leave this field blank Share \_\_\_\_\_\_[\_\_](mailto:?subject=ASQA%20website&body= "Social link email") \_\_Print

… more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain._ ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing … chieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently sched … xtraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. _Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that ar … d as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis._ ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via … eflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [**AI@ndiscommission.gov.au**](mailto:AI@ndiscommission.gov.au).

… d its Chief Information Officer to the role of AI Accountable Official, and they are responsible for implementing the policy within AFMA. ## … our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement._ ## Did you find what you were looking for? | Page last updated: 28/02/2025 Top

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026 [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) [ Listen ](https:/ … ps://www.niaa.gov.au/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement-2026 "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") ## **Purpose** The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statementNational Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is committed to the safe, ethical, and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The NIAA will leverage AI to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples while ensuring alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The NIAA’s approach is guided by [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.digitalindustry.gov.au/poublicy/ai/transparency-statements). It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page discusses NIAA’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI to enhance public services for Indigenous Australians, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. ## NIAA approach to AI adoption and use ### Opportunities and risks The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) describes a familyations/australias-ai-ethics-principles). The NIAA supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty and applies the [Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data](https://www.niaa.gov.au/our-work/data-evaluation-and-research/framework-governance-indigenous-data-gid) to ensure that any use of AI strengthens community control, supports Closing the Gap priorities, and protects cultural rights through safe stewardship of Indigenous data. ## **How NIAA uses AI** The NIAA classifies its AI usage according to the [DTA Classification System](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Based ofn technologies that brings together computing power, scalability, networking, connected devices and interfaces, and data. AI technologies and systems built on these technologies can be programmed to perform specific tasks such as reasoning, planning, natural language processhis classification, the NIAA currently uses AI for workplace productivity. The NIAA has deployed enterprise tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat) for administrative efficiency, including drafting, computer vision, audio processing, interaction, prediction and more. AI technologies can operate with varying levels of autonomy. These potential efficiencies present opportunities for improved outcomes for service delivery, they also present risks. NIAA continues to review its internal policies to ensure our: 1. AI use is appropriately governed 1. engagement with AI is confident, culturally safe and responsible 1. stakeholders have trust in our use of AI 1. risks are identified and addressed 1. access and usage is monitored. ### How NIAA uses AI At this time NIAA has not authorised the use of AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, withorrespondence and summarising meetings. This is governed under the DTA Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government and aligned with the [National Framework for the Assurance of Artificial Intelligence in Government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). The NIAA adopts human oversight policy for AI use in the Agency. The NIAA does not use AI for decision-making. All AI-generated outputs a human intermediary or intervention. In September 2024 NIAA personnel gained access to a generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. Thre reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member. ## **Staff training and capability** To ensure the responsible usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. All staff are required to complete internal AI fundamentals training. NIAA is considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation through its technical partnership with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). See the ‘Adopting emerging technologies’ section in the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/miechnology, the NIAA mandates that all staff complete AI literacy and ethics training as a core requirement under the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). All NIAA staff will complete the [AI in Government Fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies). ## AI safety and governance ### Operating environment NIAA outsources the provision of its ICT network infrastructure & training from PM&C, governed under terms stipulated in a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Oneundamentals) course via the APS Academy. This training covers ethical implications, security risks, and output verification. ## **Governance, reporting, and compliance** To maintain public trust and meet Commonwealth mandatory requirements, the NIAA has implemented the following governance framework and will work ofn the terms in the MoU is NIAA will abide by PM&C’s ICT policies and procedures. Where a statement in this document conflicts with another PM&C AI or ICT policy then the latter will take precedence. ### Governance The governance of all NIAA’s official systems leverages PM&C ICT policies, protocols and procedures, including the PM&C AI Policy. The policy has been developed tose measures: 1. **Accountable Official:** The NIAA Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring agency-wide compliance with [AI policies](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability). 1. **Risk Management:** The NIAA will establish an assessment approach align withed to the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf), and outlines requirements for: 1. measuring effectiveness ofDTA AI Impact Assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) to identify privacy, security, and cultural safety risks for AI use cases. 1. **Mandatory Reporting:** The NIAA will maintain an internal AI Uservices through governance and other processes. 1. maintain compliance with applicable legislation, regulation, and whole of government policies. Please [contact us](https://www.niaa.gov.au/about-niaa/contact-us "Contact us") if you have further enquiries. Case Register. The NIAA will formally notify the DTA of transparency compliance and report any high-risk AI applications as required via the DTA Reporting Portal. 1. **Technical Standards:** The NIAA systems are integrated within PROTECTED ICT environment, managed in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). ## **Transparency and feedback** The NIAA reviews this statement annually. This statement was published on 19 February27 March 20256 and will be reviewed annually, or when: 1. If there is a significantnotable change to the agencyNIAA’s approach to AI, or 1. aAny other new factorCommonwealth and/or DTA measures are introduced which will impacts this statement. ## Feedback Did you find this page useful? Yes No Do you have any oWe encourage feedback from the public regarding our use of these technologies. You can contact us on ther feedback? View our [website privacy notice](https://www.niaa.gov.au/website-privacy-notice "Website Privacy Notice"). Leave this field blankollowing email addresses: - **General enquiries:** [ai@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22ai@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Privacy matters:** [privacy@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22privacy@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Media enquiries:** [media@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22media@niaa.gov.au%22).

# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement TEQSA acknowledgesis committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). TEQSA acknowledges the opportunities AI offers to improve productivity and is committed to using AI in a manner that is accountable, transparent and maintains public confidence in our agency. ## TEQSA’s approach to AI When considering the use of AI TEQSA will ensure any use follows the requirements of the Digital Transformation Agency’s [_Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)I in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) that sets the approach for the use of AI by government. ## How TEQSA uses AI TEQSA participated in a short Microsoft Copilot trial in 2024, which has now concluded. TEQSA uses MS productivity tools’ limited AI capabiliai/ai-in-government-policy). ## Why TEQSA is considering the adoption of AI TEQSA is considering using AI to enhance its ability to efficiently protect student interests and uphold the reputation of Australia's higher education sector. ## How we use and are considering using AI TEQSA will only use AI where it has been assessed and found to be safe, ethical and effective. Any risks associated with the use of AI will be assessed and managed in accordance with TEQSA’s broader risk framework and whole-of-government policies. TEQSA currently uses the limited AI capabilities of Microsoft productivity tools. TEQSA is considering using Microsoft Copilot analytiecs but has not authorised the use of AI in service delivery including our regulatory function or decision-making processes. ## Training and assistance All TEQSA staff will be required to undertake the DTA’s AI fundamentals training modules to raise awareness and develop basic understanding of AI. ## Accountable officials The Chief Information Officer is designated as the accountable official for TEQSA. An AI Steering Committee will be established to develop an overarching agency approach to AI and assess the opportunities and risks in using AI within the agency. ## Statement review and updates This AI transparency statement was first published in March 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when significant change is made to our apfunctionality for insights and workplace productivity. The domains TEQSA is considering the use of AI in are corporate and enabling, and compliance and fraud detection. TEQSA is not considering the adoption of AI for decision-making purposes. TEQSA is not considering the use of AI in a manner where a member of the public or a higher education provider would directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI or its outputs without human review. ## How TEQSA will monitor the effectiveness of our AI use TEQSA will monitor: - our staff completion rates for mandatory AI training - productivity impacts of AI use - data and analytical insights generated by AI use - the nature, circumstance and impacts of any AI incidents. Based on the monitoring of AI effectiveness TEQSA will update its governance processes, guidance, policies and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. ## Governance We have established governance processes and forums to assess and review the use of AI. These include the establishment of an AI Steering Group (AISG) and appointment of an Accountable Official and a Chief AI Officer to oversee how TEQSA implements and uses AI. The functions of the AISG include: - promoting safe and responsible use of AI - overseeing the development of TEQSA’s AI policies and processes - setting-up and overseeing AI initiatives and pilots - developing pathways for staff, service providers and other stakeholders to report AI use concerns or incidents - overseeing development and implementation of mandatory AI capability training for all staff. ## Compliance TEQSA will only use AI when doing so is in accordance with applicable legislation, frameworks, policies and best proach to AI. ## Contact information If you have any enquiriestice. Any AI initiatives will align with the APS values, and TEQSA delivery of public value. ## Who to contact about thiTEQSA’s statement, we can be reached via the details on the [contact us](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/contact-us "Contact us") page of this website For any questions regarding this statement, or for more information about how TEQSA uses AI, please email [enquiries@teqsa.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@teqsa.gov.au). ###### Last updated: 25 Mar 20256

# Transparent Use of AI at the Commission Published 28 February 2025 Last updated 25 March 2026 Share - \[Linkedin\](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&u … dates to this statement This transparency statement was last updated oin 26 FebruaryMarch 20256. We will update this statement at least every twelve months or when: … omy/term/6) [APS managers](https://www.apsc.gov.au/taxonomy/term/7) Was this page helpful? Yes No Please add your comments: ## Acknowledgement of Country The APSC acknowledges the Traditional C …

… The DTA has two accountable officials under the policy. These are the Chief Technology Officer (CTO), [_Andrew Morrison_](https://www.directory.gov.au/people/andrew-morrisoAI Branch Manager, [Ramsey Beydoun](https://www.directory.gov.au/portfolios/finance/digital-transformation-agency/chief-executive-officer-chris-fechner/deputy-ceo-strategy-planning-and-performance-lucy-poole/branch-manager-ai-technical-standards-ramsey-beydoun) and the Chief Operating Officer (COO), [_Tom Gilmartin_](https://ww … more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. This transparency statement was last updated on 1 December 2025. It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. **Update Publication Date** | **Update Comment**\ ---|---\ 1 November …

… - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer/, Chief Risk OfficInformation and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/ … information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corp … lease contact the [OAIC directly.](https://www.oaic.gov.au/contact-us) This statement was last reviewed on 24 January 2026. Did you find this helpful?  Yes  No  We'd love to hear more!  Please tell us more Rate your experience We'd love to hear more about your rating What did you come here to do? How can we improve this information? ⨯ Share [ Facebook ](https://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) [ Twitter ](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) [ Linkedin ](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite?url=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement)

… ial\ GPO Box 1252\ CANBERRA ACT 2601\ Australia Fri, 2025-02-28 12:00 Skip to main content - [About us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us "About us") - [Who we are](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are "Who we are") - [What we do](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do "What we do") - [Stakeholders and partners](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/stakeholders-and-partners "Stakeholders and partners") - [NHR Agreement](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/nhr-agreement "NHR Agreement") - [Our teams](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/our-people "Our teams") - [Leadership team](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/leadership-team "Leadership team") - [Organisational structure](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure "Organisational structure") - [Corporate governance](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance "Corporate governance") - [Contact us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/contact-us "Contact us") - [Careers](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/careers "Careers") - [Current vacancies](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/careers/current-vacancies "Current vacancies")

… sparency-Statement-icon.png) # Our AI Transparency Statement ###### February 3March 19, 2026 The Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission (the Commission) acknowledges the Digital Transformation Agency's [ _**Policy for the responsible use of AI in gGovernment**_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) that sets the approach … ng from safe and responsible use of AI systems. Whilst the Commission followsabides by the Digital Transformation Agency's [Policy for the responsible use of AI in Government ](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) (DTA Policy), the Commission currently operates within the Department … logy capabilities supporting compliant and responsible AI exploration. As the Commission operates under the Department’s network and associated technologies, we are committed to aligning practices with the Department’s policies, standards, and governance frameworks, whilst also ensuring to follow the DTA’s Policy for reasonable use of AI in Government. The Commission will continue to develop our own capabilities, will ensure all approaches to emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, are consistent with the broader expectations and obligations of Government, whilst also meeting the specific needs of the Commission. The Commission understands Transparency is key to earning public trust and is an important aim of the DTA Policy and broader APS Reforms. The Commission has access to and is currently exploring AI capabilities through two main initiatives: our participation is through the Department’s GovAI program and the use of Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS. ### GovAI Program This initiative gives the Commission a chance to get hands-on experience with various AI tools in a secure, controlled setting. Our focus is on exploring how AI might boost productivity in our corporate and enabling functions, as well as enhance our policy development and data analytic capabilities. For more information visit - [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) ### Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS The Commission has authorised limited use of Microsoft Copilot through the GovTEAMS platform. This tool provides AI-assisted capabilities within the whole-of-government secure collaborative environment, further supporting day-to-day operations and decision-making processes. ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (DSS internal) In addition to the GovAI and Microsoft Copilot via GovTeams, the Commission has authorised the use of Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat within the DSS controlled environment. All AI outputs are checked by a human before they are applied or acted on. This ensures technology supports our operations but does not replace human judgment in areas that affect people’s lives. These initiatives are being undertaken with appropriate governance and oversight arrangements in place by the Department. Staff training on AI is a central consideration of these governance and oversight protocols, and mandatory training has been made available to Commission staff. The Department has advised additional training will be rolled out throughout the year to support staff participating in the AI initiatives and to build AI capability across the workforce, and the Commission is committed to being involved and developing training and support information relevant to the Commission. [The Launch of the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service](https://ministers.finance.gov.au/financeminister/speech/2025/11/12/launch-ai-plan-australian-public-service) was released in November 2025, where it has been advised ‘ _Every agency will have to appoint an SES level Chief AI Officer by July next year, whose role will be to drive adoption, champion strategic change within their agencies, and work alongside existing AI accountable officials to ensure compliance and coordination.’_ The Department has appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as their Accountable Official. This is consistent with the DTA Policy. The CIO is responsible for implementation of the DTA Policy and for leading on matters of AI within the Department. The Commission is currently exploring whether we are required to appoint a CIO or if we come under the appointment of the Department’s CIO. The Commission is committed to keeping up to date with changes in the AI policy and governance environment and engage with whole-of-government capacity building initiatives, such as GovAI, to encourage APS-wide capability uplift over time. While the Commission’s use of AI is currently limited to controlled trials and exploration, we are committed to ensuring compliance with applicable legislation and Due to this, the Department will assume the role of the SES level Chief AI Officer on behalf of the Commission. This is in line with whole of government transparency guidance and the Commission will rely on the Department’s AI Transparency Statement. The Department’s AI Transparency Statement provides information about how AI systems are governed and used and can be accessed at: [Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement) At a time where this information changes or updates are required, the Commission will inform the public by updating this webpage. The Director - Corporate Support remains as the contact for the Commission and the designated Executive Level 2 accountable official and will continue to work with DTA and the Department in regulations, and any future use of AI is undertaken safely and responsibly. The Commission will ensure: - AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible - risks are identified and managed - AI access and usage is monitored - measures are implemented to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems - efforts are made to protect the public against negative impacts. The Commission’s AI Transparency Statement will be reviewed and updated annually or when we make a significant change to our approach to AI. The Director - Governance and Corporate Coordination is designated as the accountable official under the Policy and may be contacted on [** to the Commission’s responsible use of AI. Any questions regarding the Commission’s use of AI can be directed to [corporate@dfsvc.gov.au**](mailto:corporate@dfsvc.gov.au). Thue, 2026-02-03 16:153-19 11:00 [Other](https://www.dfsvc.gov.au/taxonomy/term/25)

… public-service-ai-plan-2025), agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer (CAIO). The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the CAIOhief AI Officer and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, pr …

… changes or if any material change affects the statement’s accuracy. Skip to main content - [Home](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/ "Home") - [About](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-cca "About") - [Who we are](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/who-we-are "Who we are") - [Authority Meetings](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/authority-meetings "Authority Meetings") - [Corporate documents](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/corporate-documents "Corporate documents") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/reconciliation-action-plan "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Employment](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/employment "Employment") - [Information Publication Scheme](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/information-publication-scheme "Information Publication Scheme") - [Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/emissions-reduction-plan "Emissions Reduction Plan") - [Projects](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/projects "Projects") - [Sector Pathways Review](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/sector-pathways-review "Sector Pathways Review") - [2035 Emissions Reduction Targets Advice](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/2035-emissions-reduction-targets-advice "2035 Emissions Reduction Targets Advice") - [Annual Progress Report](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/annual-progress-report "Annual Progress Report") - [ACCU Scheme Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/accu-scheme-reviews "ACCU Scheme Reviews") - [NGER Act Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/nger-act-reviews "NGER Act Reviews") - [Special Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/special-reviews "Special Reviews") - [Research reports](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/publications/research-reports "Research reports") - [Resources](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/resources "Resources") - [Climate Policy Tracker](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/climate-policy-tracker "Climate Policy Tracker") - [CCA Glossary](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/cca-glossary "CCA Glossary") - [Reports and Publications](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/reports-and-publications "Reports and Publications") - [Authority submissions to external consultations](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/authority-submissions-external-consultations "Authority submissions to external consultations") - [Consultation](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/public-consultation "Consultation") - [All News](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/latest-news "All News") #### Subscribe to email updates and news articles from the Climate Cha …

… of our use of AI systems through continuous learning and adaptation. This statement was last updated on 12 December 2025 and will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI or when new factors impact this statement. If you have questions, concerns or would like more information about h … t be taken into account when determining how the law applies to you. Last updated: 9 Jan 2026 Page ID: 1173 ## Was this page helpful? Was this page helpful? Was this page helpful? Yes No Why or why not? (optional) Please note that feedback you provide here will be used only for the purpose of improving our website. If you have a specific question about your AML/CTF obligations, please [contact us](https://www.austrac.gov.au/contact-us). Leave this field blank - [What we do](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do) - [Intelligence](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/intelligence) - [Regulation](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/regulation) - [Our people](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people) - [AUSTRAC CEO](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people/our-ceo) - [AUSTRAC organisational chart](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people/organisational-chart) - [Careers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/work-with-austrac) - [Current vacancies](https://www.austrac.gov.au/careers/current-vacancies) - [How to apply](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/how-apply) - [AUSTRAC culture and benefits](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/austrac-culture-and-benefits) - [AUSTRAC salary rates](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/austrac-salary-rates "AUSTRAC salary rates and salary points") - [Our commitment to diversity and inclusion](https://www.austrac.gov.au/diversity-and-inclusion) - [Corporate information and governance](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance) - [Freedom of information](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information) - [Freedom of Information disclosure log](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/freedom-information-disclosure-log) - [Information publishing scheme](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/information-publishing-scheme) - [Information Publication Scheme Plan](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/information-publication-scheme-plan) - [AUSTRAC policies](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies) - [AUSTRAC's approach to regulation](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/austracs-approach-regulation) - [Co-design at AUSTRAC](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/co-design-austrac) - [Code of conduct procedures](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/code-conduct-procedures "AUSTRAC's code of conduct procedures where a breach has occurred") - [English language translation policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/english-language-translation-policy) - [Exemption policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/exemption-policy) - [Privacy policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/privacy-policy) - [Public Interest Disclosures](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-austrac-procedures) - [Corporate plan](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/corporate-plan) - [Annual reports](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/annual-reports) - [Reports and accountability](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability) - [AUSTRAC Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) Charter](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-audit-and-risk-committee-charter) - [Statement of Expectations and Statement of Intent](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/statement-expectations-and-statement-intent) - [ACLEI corruption prevention report](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-integrity-assessment-aclei-corruption-prevention-report) - [Budget](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/budget) - [Commonwealth Child Safe Framework - annual statement of compliance (2021)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/commonwealth-child-safe-framework-annual-statement-compliance-2021) - [Contracts](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/contracts) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register "Gifts and benefits register") - [Grants](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/grants-awarded-austrac) - [Report on the statutory review of the AML/CTF Act and associated Rules and Regulations](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/report-statutory-review-amlctf-act-and-associated-rules-and-regulations) - [Review of the AUSTRAC industry contribution levy arrangements](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/review-austrac-industry-contribution-levy-arrangements) - [Senate file list](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/senate-file-list) - [AUSTRAC Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ✕

… , please contact us at [ai@arpansa.gov.au](mailto:ai@arpansa.gov.au) Skip to main content - [Our service charter](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/service-charter "Our service charter") - [Corporate Plan](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan "Corporate Plan") - [Corporate Plan 2025–26](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2025-26 "Corporate Plan 2025–26") - [Corporate Plan 2024-25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2024-25 "Corporate Plan 2024-25") - [Corporate Plan 2023–24](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2023-24 "Corporate Plan 2023–24") - [Corporate Plan 2022–23](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2022-23 "Corporate Plan 2022–23") - [Corporate Plan 2021–22](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2021-22 "Corporate Plan 2021–22") - [Corporate Plan 2020–21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2020-21 "Corporate Plan 2020–21") - [Corporate Plan 2019–2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2019-2023 "Corporate Plan 2019–2023") - [Corporate Plan 2018-2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2018-2022 "Corporate Plan 2018-2022") - [Corporate Plan 2017-21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2017-21 "Corporate Plan 2017-21") - [Corporate Plan 2016-20](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2016-20 "Corporate Plan 2016-20") - [Planning and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/planning-and-accountability "Planning and accountability") - [Regulator Performance Framework](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/regulator-performance "Regulator Performance Framework") - [Work health and safety policy statement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/work-health-and-safety "Work health and safety policy statement") - [Quarterly Report series](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-reports "Quarterly Report series") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2025 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2025") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2025 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2025") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2024 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2024") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2024 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2024") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2024 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2024") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2024 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2024") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2023 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2023") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2023 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2023") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2023 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2023") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2023 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2023") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2022 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2022") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2022 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2022") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2022 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2022") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2022 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2022") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2021 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2021") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2021 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2021") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2021 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2021") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2021 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2021") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2020 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2020") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2020 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2020") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2020 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2020") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2020 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2020") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2019 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2019") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2019 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2019") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2019 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2019") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2019 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2019") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2018 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2018") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2018 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2018") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2018 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2018") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2018 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2018") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2017 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2017") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2017 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2017") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2017 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2017") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2017 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2017") - [ARPANSA Research Strategy](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/arpansa-research-strategy "ARPANSA Research Strategy") - [ARPANSA's artificial intelligence transparency statement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/arpansas-artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement "ARPANSA's artificial intelligence transparency statement") - [Annual Report series](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports "Annual Report series") - [Annual Report 2024-25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2024-25 "Annual Report 2024-25") - [Annual Report 2023–24](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2023-24 "Annual Report 2023–24") - [Annual Report 2022–23](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2022-23 "Annual Report 2022–23") - [Annual Report 2021–22](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2021-22 "Annual Report 2021–22") - [Annual Report 2020–21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2020-21 "Annual Report 2020–21") - [Annual Report 2019–20](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2019-20 "Annual Report 2019–20") - [Annual Report 2018-19](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2018-19 "Annual Report 2018-19") - [Annual Report 2017-18](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18 "Annual Report 2017-18") - [Letter of transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report "Letter of transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-0 "Reader's guide") - [Acknowledgement of Country](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-1 "Acknowledgement of Country") - [ARPANSA snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-2 "ARPANSA snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-3 "Part 1: CEO foreword") - [Part 2: Agency overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-4 "Part 2: Agency overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-15 "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-5 "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - ARPANSA leads the way as a SunSmart workplace](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-6 "Case study 1 - ARPANSA leads the way as a SunSmart workplace") - [Case study 2 - ANSTO Nuclear Medicine licence to operate](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-7 "Case study 2 - ANSTO Nuclear Medicine licence to operate") - [Case study 3 - Our role in the proposed National Radioactive Waste Management Facility project](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-8 "Case study 3 - Our role in the proposed National Radioactive Waste Management Facility project") - [Case study 4 - LearnHub: an innovative way to expand ARPANSA’s capabilities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-9 "Case study 4 - LearnHub: an innovative way to expand ARPANSA’s capabilities") - [Part 4: Management and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-10 "Part 4: Management and accountability") - [Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-11 "Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-12 "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6: Appendix 1 - ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-13 "Part 6: Appendix 1 - ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Part 6: Appendix 2 - Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-14 "Part 6: Appendix 2 - Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-16 "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-17 "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-18 "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2016-17](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17 "Annual Report 2016-17") - [Letter of transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report "Letter of transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-0 "Reader's guide") - [Acknowledgement of Country](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-1 "Acknowledgement of Country") - [ARPANSA snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-2 "ARPANSA snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-3 "Part 1: CEO foreword") - [Part 2: Agency overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-4 "Part 2: Agency overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-5 "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-6 "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - ARPANSA’s website](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-7 "Case study 1 - ARPANSA’s website") - [Case study 2 - The Personal Radiation Monitoring Service](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-8 "Case study 2 - The Personal Radiation Monitoring Service") - [Case study 3 - Ultraviolet Radiation Services](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-9 "Case study 3 - Ultraviolet Radiation Services") - [Case study 4 - ConvEx-3: ARPANSA’s part in an international nuclear emergency exercise](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-10 "Case study 4 - ConvEx-3: ARPANSA’s part in an international nuclear emergency exercise") - [Part 4: Management and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-11 "Part 4: Management and accountability") - [Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-12 "Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-13 "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-14 "Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Part 6 - Appendix 2: Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-15 "Part 6 - Appendix 2: Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-16 "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-17 "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-18 "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2015-16](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16 "Annual Report 2015-16") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-letter-transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-readers-guide "Reader's guide") - [ARPANSA Snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-arpansa-snapshot "ARPANSA Snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO Foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-1-ceo-foreword "Part 1: CEO Foreword") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-2-agency-overview "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-3-report-performance "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-3-report-financial-performance "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - The ACDS](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-case-study-1-acds "Case study 1 - The ACDS") - [Case study 2 - The ANRDR](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-case-study-2-anrdr "Case study 2 - The ANRDR") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-4-management-and-accountability "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-5-financial-statements "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licencing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-appendix-1-arpansa-licensing-activities "Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licencing activities") - [Appendix 2: Operations of RHSAC and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-appendix-2-operations-rhsac-and-committees "Appendix 2: Operations of RHSAC and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-7-list-compliance "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-copyright-and-contact-details "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2014-15](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15 "Annual Report 2014-15") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Part 1: CEO's Review](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-1 "Part 1: CEO's Review") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3.1: Public, workers and environment](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3 "Part 3.1: Public, workers and environment") - [Part 3.2: Radiological & nuclear safety & security](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-2 "Part 3.2: Radiological & nuclear safety & security") - [Part 3.3: Ionising radiation in medicine](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-3 "Part 3.3: Ionising radiation in medicine") - [Part 3.4: Regulation and enforcement activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-4 "Part 3.4: Regulation and enforcement activities") - [Part 3.5: Stakeholder engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part3-5 "Part 3.5: Stakeholder engagement") - [Part 3.6: Discussion on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part3-6 "Part 3.6: Discussion on financial performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations") - [Appendix 10: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Publications") - [Appendix 11: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 12: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-12 "Appendix 12: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/guide "Reader guides") - [Copyright and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/imprint "Copyright and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2013-14](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14 "Annual Report 2013-14") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Part 1: CEO's Review](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-1 "Part 1: CEO's Review") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3.1: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3 "Part 3.1: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.2: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-2 "Part 3.2: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-3 "Part 3.3: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.4: Stakeholder engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-4 "Part 3.4: Stakeholder engagement") - [Part 3.5: International engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-5 "Part 3.5: International engagement") - [Part 3.6: Discussions and analysis of financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-6 "Part 3.6: Discussions and analysis of financial performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations") - [Appendix 10: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Publications") - [Appendix 11: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 12: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-12 "Appendix 12: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/guide "Reader guides") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2012-13](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13 "Annual Report 2012-13") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Our Agency](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/our-agency "Our Agency") - [Part 1: Review by the CEO](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-1 "Part 1: Review by the CEO") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-3 "Part 3: Report on Performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: Publications") - [Appendix 10: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 11: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/guide "Reader guides") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2011-12](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12 "Annual Report 2011-12") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Our Agency](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/our-agency "Our Agency") - [Part 1: Review by the CEO](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-1 "Part 1: Review by the CEO") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-3 "Part 3: Report on Performance") - [Part 4 Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-4 "Part 4 Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 2: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 3: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 4: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 5: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 6: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 7: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 8: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Publications") - [Appendix 9: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 10 Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-10 "Appendix 10 Index of Compliance") - [Reader guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/guide "Reader guide") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Emissions Reduction Plan 2024/25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/emissions-reduction-plan-202425 "Emissions Reduction Plan 2024/25") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/reconciliation-action-plan "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Significant regulatory activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/significant-regulatory-activities "Significant regulatory activities") - [Report to Parliament - Radiation exposure of a worker at ANSTO Health, Lucas Heights on 22 August 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/reports-parliament/report-parliament-radiation-exposure-worker-ansto "Report to Parliament - Radiation exposure of a worker at ANSTO Health, Lucas Heights on 22 August 2017") [![Access to information](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/sites/default/fil …

# **AI Transparency Statement** Screen Australia is committed to safe, responsible, ethical, and transparentresponsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies i. Screen Australia recognises that AI tools offer opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery, while requiring careful management of risks. In accordance with the principles outlined by the Digital Transformatio … use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (“the Policy”). In accordance with the requirements under the Policy, this Transparency Statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption. We acknowledge that AI usage and adoption is rapidly evolving, and are committed to ongoing refinement of our policies and approaches to, this statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption, and how AI related risks are being managed. ### How we use AI. Screen Australia’s accountable official who is responsible for implementing the Policy is our Chief Operating Officer, Grainne Brunsdon. The accountable official’s other responsibilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use cases - acting as enables staff and contractors to use AI tools responsibly to improve productivity in the course of their work and service delivery, while protecting confidential, personal and sensitive information and maintaining public trust. In March 2026, we updated our internal Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia’s c Employees & Contract point for AI - engaging with whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keeping up to date with changing requirements. ### **How Screen Australia uses AI** Screen Australia supports the ethical and legal use of AI technologies and services. We do not currently use AI technologies or services where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI usage, without a human intermediary or human intervention. Screen Australia currently uses AI in the domains, as defined by the DTA, of ‘service delivery’ and ‘corporate and enabling’.ors. The policy incorporates the Australian Government’s [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) and [Staff guidance on public generative AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai). We also implemented mandatory training for staff on the responsible use of AI. Our internal policy states the terms for approved usage of AI tools by Screen Australia also employs the DTA defined usage patterns of ‘workplace productivity’ and ‘analytics for insights’. ### **Approach to Staff Usage** Staff may access AI technologies and services in the course of their wees and contractors. It reminds all Screen Australia employees and contractors that they: - are fully accountable fork and onll work devices if the technology and service has been approved by the agency. In August 2024, we introduced an internal _Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia Employees & Contractors_, that states the terms upon which our employees and contractors will: - seek approval to use AI technology and services. - use AI technology and services if approved. This internal policy requires staff to comply with the Australian Government’s [_Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai)when using any approved AI tool, and reminds employees and contractors of their current obligations under policy, contract and applicable laws. The interim guidance requires staff above all to: - be able to explain, justify and take ownership of their advice and decisions - not input anything into an AI tool that could reveal classified, personal or otherwise sensitive information. The agency also held an internal mandatory webinar to educate Screen Australia staff about these terms of approval and usage. Screen Australia follows the direction of Government on the use of specific AI platforms, such as the February directive regarding DeepSeek. From February 2025, staff cannot access or use DeepSeek on Screen Australia devices or private devices that contain agency email accessproducts, advice and decisions - must not input anything into an AI tool that could reveal confidential, personal or commercial in confidence information. Screen Australia’s internal policy also states the terms upon which contractors and consultants must follow Screen Australia’s security requirements, and disclose and document their AI use. AI tools used by Screen Australia staff includes enterprise AI deployed in our closed internal ICT environment, including Microsoft 365 Copilot, as well as publicly available browser-based or app-based AI such as ChatGPT and Claude. Screen Australia follows the direction of Government on the use of specific AI platforms. For example, following the directive from Government, Screen Australia staff cannot access or use DeepSeek on agency devices or personal devices that contain a work profile. The public do not have direct interaction with any Screen Australia systems that utilise AI technologies and will not by impacted by our use of AI. The tasks completed by Screen Australia staff using AI falls into several domains and usage patterns as outlined by the DTA’s Classification system for AI use. These are: - The domains of ‘service delivery’ and ‘corporate and enabling’; and - The usage patterns ‘workplace productivity’ and ‘analytics for insights’. ### ​**Managing Sstakeholder Uusage** Any use of AI by our stakeholders, including applicants for funding, must be declared and be consistent with Screen Australia’s [Terms of Trade](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/screen-australia/about-us/doing-business-with-us/terms-of-trade), the relevant program guidelines, and any applicable laws. In September 2024, Screen Australia published a set of[ ](<https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-guiding-principles>)[AI Guiding Principles](<https://www.s We are continually reviewing opportunities to assist stakeholders to balance the uptake of AI as a tool for innovation and best practice, alongside the safe and responsible use of AI. In September 2024, Screena Australia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-g published a set of AI Guiding-p Principles>), which publicly articulates our expectations around the proposed use of AI technologies or services by Screen Australia and its stakeholders. These key principles are: - Talent, creativity, culture and the indiv … uity and inclusion - Fairness - Responsibility and accountability. In 2025, Screen Australia is continually reviewing opportunities to assist stakeholders to balance the uptake of AI as a tool for innovation and best practice, alongside the safe and responsible use of AI. This includes supdated all agency funding application forms to collect information on AI usage in applications, and in projects and activities seeking agency funding. The information is collected for research purposes only, to better inform the agency on how AI tools may be used by applicants. ### Monitoring & Compliance Screen Australia has a risk-based approach to the use of AI. We monitor the effectiveness of AI systems by harving updates and insights from subject matter experts. This Transparency Statement was last updated on 24 February 2025. It will be updated as Screen Australia’srobust governance arrangements, policies and processes; and monitoring AI usage. We acknowledge that AI usage and adoption is rapidly evolving, and are committed to ongoing refinement of our policies and approaches to AI changes, and at least every 12 months. For enquiries about Screen Australia’s adoption of AI, please contact [email protected] ## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, and co-productions with Australia, including key cast and creatives, duration, genre, co-production partners, international sales contacts, website links and more. \_\_to align with Government guidance and requirements, regulation and best practice. We also commit to updating our approaches in accordance with applicable legislation, including relevant copyright and privacy laws. Screen Australia’s designated accountable official who is responsible for implementing the DTA’s policy is our Chief Operating Officer, Grainne Brunsdon. The accountable official’s other responsibilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use cases - acting as Screen Australia’s contact point for AI - engaging with whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keeping up to date with changing requirements. For enquiries about Screen Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [email protected].

… he Policy for the responsible use of AI in government across PSR. The COOGM is a member of PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) which has oversi … of AI for managing and viewing medical records, and how PSR processes and technologies need to adapt to take account of this during a review … within Corporate and Enabling functions for internal communications. ## Review This transparency statement was last updated on 24 February 2025. It will be updated annually and following any event that may significantly influence PSR’s use of AI or materially impact the accuracy of this statement. ## Contact For further information about this statement or PSR’s usag …

… nfo@igis.gov.au](mailto:info@igis.gov.au). ##### Review and Updates This AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 21 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. ## Financial Statements The Office’s financial statements are availab … hich could reasonably be established from a file title. File lists: [July - December 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/IGIS%20Senate%20Continuing%20Order%20No%2012%20-%20Files%20created%20July%20to%20December%202025.PDF)\ [January - June 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025 …

False Treasury is exploring the benefits of emerging technologies such as AI. Treasury follows the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) which provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officialsility), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai/-transparency-statements). This page provides decontailns of the Treasury’s implementation of these policy requirements. ## Accountable Officials The AI transparency statement and outlines progress against the outcomes in the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## Key roles Treasury has designated the Chief Information Officer (CIO) as the aAccountable oOfficial for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the department. ## Intentions Behind AI Adoption AI applications are used internally to support workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our analytical capabilities, improve decision‑making processes, and increase operational efficiency. ## AI Use Cases The Treasury participated in the Australian Government’s trial of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. The Treasury now continues to make Copilot available to trial participants, under the classification of workplace productivity. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, Treasury staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI Accountable Officials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at Treasury. ## AI adoption Treasury’s endorsed AI products for staff use are Microsoft 365 Copilot and Microsoft Copilot Chat. Treasury permits use of some publicly available AI tools in line with the Digital Transformation Agency’s [staff guidance on public generative AI.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai) Enterprise AI tools are piloted based on business needs. Low-risk use cases are in an exploratory stage. Treasury’s current use of AI is classified as workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our operational efficiency. ## Public Iinteraction with AI The Treasury does not use AI in ways that the public mayat involve directly interaction with or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. ## Monitoring Effectiveness Wethe public, and decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at Treasury has human oversight. ## Governance of AI Appropriate governance arrangements have been established robust processes, including regular reviews, audits, and staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. These operate in tandem with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards and common procedures to support AI within Treasury. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff and is mandatory under the APS AI plan. As a prerequisite to utilising Enterprise AI tools, staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). ## Training and Governance Impacted staff will have access to training that aligns with the responsible and acceptable use of AI policies, and appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within Treasury. ## Protecting Against Negative Impacts We have established robust processes and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. Our efforts are aligned with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards, and common procedures as outlined in the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). The use of publicly available AI services is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Compliance with Legislation The Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations. We are committed to maintaining transparency and accountability in our AI practices through the AI transparency statement. ## Update Frequency ThiWe have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. The use of AI is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Update frequency Treasury’s transparency statement is reviewed and updated annually or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on 28 February 20256. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Information Officer …

… standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.financedigital.gov.au/about-us/departmentpolicy/ai/AI-technical-standard) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguar … urces/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are: ·- analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse in … e Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information ·- workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with … very and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within the Ddecision making and administrative action or Image processing usage patterns, or the Ccompliance and fraud detection, and Law enforcement, intelligence and s …

… e a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Aartificial Iintelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI … - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Ffreedom of Iinformation considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and respo … ts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **## Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key act … logies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and busin …

# AI Transparency Statement The pDigital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating torequires agencies to designate AI accountable officials and publish a public AI transparency statements. This page provides details of the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC)’s implementation of these policy requirements. ## **Accountable Official** The ALRC has an AI Accountable Official under the policy,. The ALRC’s AI Accountable Official is the Director of Operations and Finance (Mandeep Bahia), reporting to the Executive Director of the ALRC (Ruth Barson). There is no change to the ALRC’s accountable official. The AI Accountable Official has primary responsibility for the development and application of the ALRC’s AI policy across the follownd implementation approach, including: - Ffacilitating ALRC involvement in cross-government AI coordination and collaboration - Ddeveloping and maintaining the ALRC’s AI policy and its associated implementation plansupporting resources - uplifting governance, education and guidance for AI use in the ALRC - Eembedding a culture that fairly balances AI risk management and innovation - Uplifting governance and education of AI adoption in the ALRC - Enhancing the response andmonitoring implementation - supporting adaptation to AI policy changes in the ALRC - Encouraging the development or alignment of an ALRC or Inquiry-specific AI policy - Reviewing and monitoring ALRC’s AI policy implementation regularly and providing feedback to the ALRC’s President and Audit & Risk Committeewhole-of-government AI policy over time. ## **ALRC’s Aapproach to AI Aadoption and Uuse** The ALRC has not yet used AI is committed to adopting any formal setting or supported any Law Reform activities to date. Our intention is to trial the adoption of AI in 2025 and beyond as part of d using AI in a way that is safe, ethical, accountable and transparent, consistent withe Australian Government’s commitment to digital innov requirements and community expectations. The ALRC is committed to demonstrating, encouraging, and supporting the safe and responsible adoption of AI within the Australian Public Service, and in digital and ICT investments, systems, and digital services. As part of this commitment, we will implement AI fundamentals training for all staff, regardless of their rAt present, the ALRC’s approach is to: - use AI only for approved, low-risk workplace productivity purposes, and - build organisational capability and governance so we can assess whether, and how, AI might responsibly support additional activities over time (subject to risk assessment and approvals). As part of this commitment, the ALRC maintains internal guidance and training requirements for staff on the safe and responsible use of AI tooles. ## **How the ALRC Uuses AI At this time, we are not using AI to support any of our Law Reform activities or engage with the public. From April 2025 we intend to trial AI to support Workplace Productivity and trial generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We understand that the Australian government trailed this software from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024 and a number of commonwealth agencies have adopted this software. Copilot has yet to be formally announced internally or made available to staff officially. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, ALRC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. We also intend to consider the use of AI tools to support Legal Research and will look to Pilot Lexis Nexis+ AI or similar such products which are used within the legal industry to support research. We have a policy and SharePoint page on the use of AI tools by staff, which staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing any generative AI tools online. This policy encourages and assists staff to: - Not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without external verification. - Prohibit the distribution of sensi** ### **Public interaction and impact** The ALRC is not using AI in a way the public can directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, If this changes, we will update this statement to describe the use and safeguards ### **Law reform activities** The ALRC does not use AI for strictly law reform activities, including legal analysis, drafting or recommendations. AI does not produce or materially influence inquiry outputs. ### **Corporate and workplace productivity** Our current AI use is limited to workplace productivity. All staff have access to Microsoft Copilot, and Microsoft 365 Copilot is available to approved roles across the organisation (for example, for collaboration, meeting support, and drafting and summarising routivne material (as outlined in Clause 9.2 in the [Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework – Release 2024 Guidelines](https://www.pr). ## **Planned AI work** In February 2026, the ALRC established a staff working group to assess broader AI use, including potecntivesecurity.gov.au/system/files/2025-02/pspf-release-2024-guidelines_0.pdf)) to third parties, for example by copy-and-pasting sensitive content into AI software. - Sensitive materials contain information which, if disclosed without authorisation, could cause harm to an organisation, individual, or national security. These may include but is not limited to: - legal analysis documents, - confidential cal trials for inquiry-adjacent tasks such as submission analysis support, proofing and document handling (subject to governance and approval). The group is also considering legal-specific tools (for example, LexisNexis AI+ and Westlaw Edge) for porate information, - personal staff information, - stakeholder consultations, - judicial reviews for ALRC papers, - outcomes of Commissioner meetings, - ALRC internal discussion papers. The above is in line with the [ALRC Privacy Policy](https://www.alrc.gov.au/about/policies/privacy-policy/). The ALRC is participating in the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. Through our participation in this pilot, we are exploring the potential for AI to be used by our staff and by our ICT systems. The ALRC will use AI in the domain of Corporate and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivityssible future legal research support, noting these tools are not currently used for inquiry work. We have internal guidance and a SharePoint page on the use of AI tools. Staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with this guidance before accessing AI tools. Our guidance reminds staff to verify AI-generated content and to avoid sharing or copying sensitive material into AI tools, consistent with relevant Australian Government security and privacy requirements. ## **AI Ssafety and Ggovernance** Within the ALRC, all AI use cases are recorded in an internal regist … I use case - Implement measures to mitigate potential harms from AI It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. For further information or enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of artificial intelligence, you can contact us directly at## **Classification of AI system use cases** The DTA standard requires agencies to classify AI use by usage pattern and domain. The ALRC’s current AI use is classified as: - Usage pattern: Workplace productivity using Microsoft CoPilot and Copilot 365. - Domain: Corporate and enabling. If the ALRC’s AI use expands to additional usage patterns or domains, we will update this statement accordingly. ## **Updates to this statement** This statement will be updated as the ALRC’s approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. It may also be updated sooner when the ALRC makes a significant change to its approach to AI, or when any new factor materially impacts the statement’s accuracy. ## **Contact** For enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of AI, contact: [info@alrc.gov.au](mailto:info@alrc.gov.au).

… y and adaptiveness after deployment._ ## Oversight of our use of AI We are currentlyOver the past year, we have worked towards refreshing our approach to data and information governance to include … of the AI use cases. ## Our use of AI AFSA is using AI in the domains of Service Delivery and Corporate and& Enabling, and usage patterns of Analytics for Insights (for example,e.g. codebase analysis, and forecasting and predictive modelling to suppor … ht generation), and Workplace Productivity (e.g. summarising documents, meetings and emails, and preparing internal content creation). This does not … FSA. - publication of this transparency statement on AFSA's website. We are also planning our approach to achieving compliance with the additional requirements within the timeframes required by the current version of the policy (v2.0). This statement will be reviewed annually, when there is a significant … any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy. **Last updated:** 24/02/2025 **For further enquiries, contact:**[info@afsa.gov.au](mailto:info@afsa … ov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ai-transparency-statement) Was this information helpful? Yes No What were you looking for? Please provide your feedback Client type - None -Current clientCreditorGeneral publicPractitionerFinancial counsellorStaffOther We welcome your feedback to help us improve our website. We are unable to respond to comments or suggestions. Alternatively, if you would like a response, you can [send us feedback](https://services.afsa.gov.au/ccr-service/form/start) or [contact us](https://www.afsa.gov.au/contact-us "Contact us"). Leave this field blank

AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 1 of 23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 2504/023/2025 The Commission’s6 ACQSC AI tTransparency s Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) useemploys aArtificial iIntelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically. WeThe Commission complyies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) standards, in its role as whole-of-government coordinator on the use of AI by the Australian Public Service employees. The DTA is the AI whole of Australian Government coordinator. Their AI standards(APS), includeing: • Policy for the responsible use of AI in government • Standard for … t use of public generative AI tools • Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. Why we use AI We are committed to improv Our stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ The Commission’s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026. Why we use AI The Commission is dedicated to enhancing the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a responsible and safe way. We are looking into AI opportunitimanner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities, while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support our work into protecting and improve the safety, health and, wellbeing ofand quality of life for people receiving aged care. We want to benefit from the technology it provides. But we will also manage its risks. How we use AI At the moment we have limited use of services. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s classification system: • Usage patterns: o Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, and o Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ • Domains: o Compliance, o Corporate and enabling, and o Service delivery. Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI, and no use of automated decision-making. In pplications do not impact the public, and members of the public are not required to interact with AI applications in dealinegs with the DTA’s classification system, how we use AI (our usage patterns) and the aCommission. This transparency statement will be updated if this changes. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying any negative impacts from the use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI • The Commission ensureas that we use it in (domains) include: • usage patterns: o runnAI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests of the public, including the recipients of aged care services. • The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI ing analytics for insights o improving workplace productivity by automating everyday tasks • domains: o compliance o corporate and enabling o service deliveryccordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice.\ The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliance as it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission’s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop additional, Commission specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission’s ongoing commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 23 of 23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 2504/023/2025 Public interaction and impact We do not use AI applications that affect the public or to interact with them. We will update this transparency statement if this changes. When AI is used more widely, we will identify any negative effects from using it, and protect the public and people receiving aged care. We will continue to work with AI in a responsible way and be open and honest about it. Making sure we use AI safely and responsibly • We make sure that AI projects are consistent with our values and are in the best interests of the public. This includes people receiving aged care. • We apply DTA policies and use AI in line with legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. We are developing an AI strategy which will define how we use AI alongside data governance, data privacy and cybersecurity compliance. It will also follow our Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will use whole of Australian Government policies and develop other policies and processes specific to the Commission. This will support us to: • maintain strong governance frameworks • protect against negative impacts • make sure AI systems are effective. Our policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. We will also develop and educate all staff with AI basics resources. We will update this transparency statement at least once a year, or as we develop and change how we use AI, our6 This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology.\ Accountable oOfficial The Commission’s Chief Digital Officer isInformation Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Official. Cs.\ How to contact us about how weour use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or ourthe Commission’s use of AI, you can contact the Commission at: s follows:\ • email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 20256

1 www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1 AI Transparency Statement Introduction This statement outlines how the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Agency) is committed to engaging responsibly and transparently with Auses artificial I intelligence (AI) technologies to support its purpose to promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. Recognising the transformative potential of AI, the Agency is taking a proactive but cautious approach, focusing on internal workforce improvements and internal capacity building while ensuring that AI is implemented ethically, securely, and responsibly. This statement outlines the, how AI-related risks are governed and managed, and how the Agency complies with the Digital Transformation Agency'’s commitment to meeting the(DTA) Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Policy). The Agency will adopt AI technologies transparently and securely, informed by genuine consultation with our2.0 and other applicable Commonwealth AI legislation, regulations, and frameworks. The Agency is committed to a staff and ensuring alignment with government-wide principles for responsible AI implementation. The Agency’s approach includes participation in Whole-of-Government Trials, developing robust internal governance structurese and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting harmonious, productive, cooperative, and a commitment to addressing critical areas such as purpose, decision-making, risk mitigation, data protection and public transparency as AI adoption evolves. Central to this commitment is maintaining public trust and ensuring AI activities we conduct are ethical and responsible. Commitment to Transparency and Public Trust The Agency recognises the importance of transparency in maintaining public trust as we determine our approach to, and implementation of, AI. We will ensure that AI adoption remains transparent, accountable, and aligned with the latest standards and ethical guidelines. If we decide to use personal information when we procure or build AI technologies, we will comply with the Australian Privacy Principles and will provide an explanation of how personal information has been used in a way which is transparent and easily understood. The Agency will continue to adopt AI cautiously, ensuring that use aligns with our core values of fairness, respect, and accountability, and that it delivers meaningful benefits to both the community we serve and our employees. 2 Current AI Use The Agency’s engagement with AI is in its initial stages and primarily focused on establishing robust governance processes to effectively leverage AI in a safe, ethical, and responsible way that complies with our legislative and policy obligations. For example, through the Whole-of-Government Co-Pilot AI Trial a small subset of Agency staff have undertaken training and explored the potential of this secure generative AI tool to enhance productivity and business outcomes. A number of software products we use to support our administrative functions include AI tools within the product offering. The Agency also leverages software products with AI features such as technologies used for language conversion and chatbot designed to make finding information onpliant workplace relations. This means that while AI systems and capabilities may provide insights or administrative support, all decisions regarding compliance, enforcement, and entitlements, are made by authorised Agency staff. AI systems and capabilities are strictly advisory, and their outputs are reviewed and verified by our staff. Approach to AI use Our use of AI is guided by the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0, the Department of Industry Science and Resources Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and our Agency's core operational principles. We use secure, commercially available software (including generative AI systems and AI capabilities) to address a variety of AI use cases, enabling our staff to focus on high-value complex work. Classification of AI use Consistent with the DTA’s Classification system for AI use, we classify our current AI use cases under the following usage patterns; noting we do not use AI where the public may directly interact with, our website easier for users. Currently, AI is not used for d be significantly impacted by it: Domain Decision- making within the Agency or by the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO). Our use of AI falls under the classification of wand administrative action Analytics for insights Workplace productivity and analytics for insights under the Policy. Guiding Principles and Planned Activities for AI Use The FWO is committed to establishing a strong foundation for responsible, ethical and transpar Image processing Service delivery Compliance and fraud detection Internal use Law enforcement, adoption of AI. As the Agency begins to explore the potential of AI technologies, it remains focused on setting up robust governance mechanisms and aligning with its core principles to ensure AI is implemented ethically and securely: Ethics and Accountintelligence and security Internal use Policy and legal Internal use Internal use Scientific Corporate and enability : Oversight of AI initiatives will be managed through a dedicated governance framework, including a new internal governance body to provide strategic direction, monitor AI initiatives and adoption, and ensure ethical and consultation considerations are addressed as the Agency adopts and integrates AI technologies. This will ensure that all AI has human oversight and will not replace human decision-making. Employee Consultation, Safety and Wellbeing : As both a regulator and an employer, the FWO is committed to ensuring that it consults with its employees about the potential use of AI in the workplace and that AI enhances workplace safety and wellbeing in addition to supporting the services we deliver. The Agency prioritises the responsible and ethng Internal use Internal use www.fairwork.gov.au Page 2 Governance To ensure appropriate AI governance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated accountability roles including that of the: • AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI Accountable Official use of AI to support our employees to do the valua(AO), responsible wfork they provide to our community in a way that enhances our productivity and efficiency. We aim to be an employer that uses AI in our work in a manner that fulfils the objective of harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. 3 Caution and Proactivity: The Agency is taking a cautious yet proactive approach to AI adoption, focusing on gradual integration. This involves addressing risks and building internal expertise to create a sustainable and impactful AI framework. Privacy: The Agency is committed to ensuring that we maintain the trust of employers, employees, their representatives and our own employees in relation to our handling of personal information. Our AI governance framework will follow best practice guidance on the use of commercially available AI product implementation and oversight of AI initiatives. • Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role of Chief AI Officer (CAIO), providing strategic leadership, and helping drive AI adoption and cultural change within the Agency. Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through the Agency’s existing risk management procedures and on using personal information to train AI products published by the Office of the Australian Information Commission. Cyber Security: All AI initiatives will align with government security standards, including the Protective Security Policy Framework and Information Security Manual, to continue safeguarding sensitive data, our systems and ensure compliance with cyber security practices. In the coming year, the Agency will focus on the following key activities to support our adoption of AI: ● Governance and Oversight : Theprotocols and executive oversight. The following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of AI technologies: • Risk assessment s: We apply Agency ris establishing governance mechanisms to ensure transparency, monitor AI initiatives and adoption, and evaluate ethical considerations and consult with our workk management processes to evaluate proposed AI systems and AI capabilities, taking into consideration, privacy, security, and operational risks beforce and stakeholders. These mechanisms will guide AI implementation, outline how we will undertake risk assessments, and provide a governance framework for responsible and ethical AI use. ● AI Use Case Exploration : Initial efforts will focus on internal AI applications in workplace productivity and data insights using controlled pilot projects. The Agency will develop internal policies to guide AI use, provide training to build staff capability, and evaluate the potential of AI to streamline processes while maintaining ethical safeguards. AI Acafter deployment. • Executive oversight: The AO provides high -level oversight of the Agency’s AI adoption to ensure it remains within the Agency's risk appetite and aligns with whole -of-government policy. • Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is countable Official The FWO has appointed the Chief Information Officer as the AI Accountable Official responsible for: ● overseeing the development and implementation of AI initiatives within the Agency, ● ensuringinually monitored by authorised staff using the AI systems and AI capabilities. Compliance The Agency is compliancet with the DTA’s Policy and other relevant frameworks, ● providing strategic oversightfor Responsible Use onf AI governance and risk management, and ● acting as a key liaison for whole-of-government AI collaboration. 4 Artificial Intelligence definition When discussing AI, the Agency applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development definition: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.in Government 2.0. We have established a strategic approach to AI adoption, which will be formalised with the Agency’s AI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework in March 2026. Reviews, Uupdates, and Ccontact Iinformation This transparency statement was last updated on 287 February 20256. The FWO is committed to ensuring transparency as AI adoption evolves. This transparency statemenIt will be reviewed and updated: • at least annually or whenever there areonce a year • when making a significant changes to the Agency’'s AI use, governance framework or relevant government policiesapproach to AI • when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. For any ienquiries or comments regarding this statement, please complete our Feedback formntact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.

… itted to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI to offers significant opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery within our workplace. We govern our AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy) and best practice. ## Our approach to AI At Finance, we are applying the guidance outlined in DTA’s Pilot [Australian Government AI assurance framework ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework)(the Framework) and have chosen to limit our use of AI to low-risk use cases. This guidance implementshile preserving accountability, transparency and public trust. As a central agency, we provide high quality advice, frameworks and services to achieve value in the management of public resources for the benefit of all Australians. As the lead agency responsible for key initiatives under the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/at-a-glance), we aim to lead by example in the responsible adoption and use of AI across government, supported by strong governance, clear accountability and transparency. ## Our approach to AI The AI Delivery and Enablement (AIDE) function within Finance is responsible for driving the delivery of the APS AI Plan, accelerating AI adoption across the APS, addressing common barriers and monitoring AI implementation, coordinating the APS network of Chief AI Officers and developing metrics for successful AI adoption and use. The [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) project directly supports this approach by providing a secure, APS-only environment for exploring AI tools, experimenting safely with AI and data, and sharing early use cases and lessons learned across government. Finance is using this platform to develop and operate [GovAI Chat](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/tools), a secure general purpose AI tool designed to expand access to generative AI across the APS in a controlled and secure environment. In the use of AI within Finance, we follow whole-of-government policy and support our staff in low-risk use cases, building our internal AI capability as well as the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy). We also apply [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/public … ntelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and uses the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD)](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles) concepts to define AI anddefinitions to help identify which of our systems uses AI. We assess the risk of each use case against 7 criteria and a risk matrix outlined in [the framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework). These are: - fairness - reliability and safety - privacy protection and security - transparency and explainability - contestability - accountability - human-centered values. This assessment determines if a use case is low, medium, or high risk. A low-risk use case means AI does not: - directly interact with, or significhen we consider our use of AI, we apply the DTA’s [Pilot AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework), the [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) and the [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/department) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguards in place. ### How we measure the effectiveness of our AI We monitor AI adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and AI-related incidents to assess effectiveness and inform updates to our governance settings, guidance and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. Our AI solutions are approved centrally, with risks managed at the enterprise level. This includes standing approvals for low-risk uses, such as using Microsoft 365 Copilot to draft emails with information classified up to OFFICIAL. Our staff use AI to support everyday work, including making documents accessible, supporting policy antaly impact the public without human intervention - risk the security of the information or data we hold - harm the privacy of any individual, including our staff. We reassess our use cases when: - a notablsis, summarising information, analysing data, answering policy and process questions, drafting and reviewing content, writing and debugging code, and preparing meeting minutes and transcripts. If staff want to use AI beyond these central approvals, they must complete an AI impact assessment and register their use as required by the DTA’s Policy. We assess AI solutions and compare against criteria drawn from [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). Each assessment is rated low, medium or high which helps us decide if the AI use case change is made to our approach to AI or use of AI - a use case progresses to another stage in its life cycle - an AI risk or harm is identified with a use case. Any use case re be used and what extra controls might be needed. We won’t approve AI solutions or uses that still carry a medium or high level of risk after safeguards are applied. Where residual risk remains uncertain or insufficiently understood, deployment is deferred until risks can be appropriately mitigated. Any proposal assessed as being high risk will beis also reported to the DTA. ## How we use AI We allow our staff to use AI in their work with the objective of enhancingto improve productivity and servicehelp delivery. This includes enterprise AI deployed in our closed the advice, frameworks and services that Finance provides to government and other agencies. Finance provides staff with access to AI tools in two ways. In our internal ICT environment lik, staff can use Microsoft 365 Copilot, as well as publicly available AI like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini that is that is not deployed in our closed internal ICT environwhich operates within Finance’s Protected network and can be used with information up to PROTECTED, subject to our internal governance arrangements. The tasks completed by our staff usingStaff use public generative AI faltools into several usage patterns and domains as outlined by the DTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/senhance productivity and support their core responsibilities/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf). These are: - the _Analytics and insights_ usage pattern primarily in the _Scientific_ , and _Policy and legal_ domains, where the sensitivity of the data is low risk - the _Workplace productivity_ usage pattern primarily in the _Service delivery_ , and _Corporate and enabling_ domains. Our staff use AI to: - assist . When used outside Finance’s environment, only unclassified information up to OFFICIAL may be entered. Personal, sensitive or classified information must not be entered. Compliance with these requirements is monitored through our information security and governance frameworks. ### **Our AI patterns and domains** Finance classifies staff use of AI using the creation of accessible versions of government documents, - assist with policy research and analysis - summarise data across multiple sources - interrogate, analyse and obtain insights from datasets - answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies, procedures and processes - assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documentsDTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are: · analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse information, emails or other content - create and debug code used in data analysis, management and processing - assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts - search information repositories and retrieve documents, information or datanly in the Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information · workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with routine tasks, mainly in the Service delivery and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within the _Decision making and administrative action_ or _Image processing_ usage patterns, or the _Compliance and fraud detection_ , and _Law enforcement, intelligence and security_ domains. ## How we govern our AI Finance has a risk-based approach to the use of AI. This approach focuses on identifying, evaluating and monitoring the level of risk associated with implementing AI systems. Once implemented, we monitor the effectiveness of our AI systems by: - having robust governance arrangements, p use We govern our internal AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the DTA’s Policiesy and processes; and - monitoring AI usagbest practice. ### **Our AI Governance Committee** We have established an AI Governance Committee (the Committee) to oversee our adoption and use of AI within Finance. The functions of this Committee include: - developing and implementing AI safely - identifying, assessing and managing AI risks and opportunities - promoting a culture of safe and responsible use of AI - overseeing and implementing policies and advice from the DTA. This Committee is co-chaired by two accountable officials (AIGC) as well as appointed an Accountable Official (AO) and a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to oversee how Finance adopts and uses AI across the department. The AIGC is jointly chaired by the AO) and CAIO, witsh membership includesdrawn from senior executive representatives from the following areas: - Information Communication Technology Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary, Chief Information Officer and AO) - Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary and AO) - Budget Policy and Data Division - Corporate Strategy and Operations Division - Digital ID and Data Policy Division - Legal and Assurance Branch - Human Resources Branchs across the department. It supports safe and responsible AI use by providing oversight of key decisions, risks and controls for AI use at Finance. The functions of AIGC include: - promoting a culture of safe and responsible AI use across our workplace - monitoring, assessing and managing AI‑related risks and opportunities - overseeing and implementing policies and guidance from the DTA. ### **Our internal policies and processes** Finance has policies and processes for the adoption and use of AI by … ta policy - Privacy policy - Risk management policy framework. These policies and processes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain fit for purpose. We prov … is training prior to being granted access to our secure internal AI. ### Our adherence to Whole of Australian Government AI policies Finance is dedicacommitted to the fully implementing [ation of the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensuring ongoing compliance with [the Policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) This and to maintaining ongoing compliance. This commitment includes reviewing and updating this statement annually, or when new factors orsooner where there is a significant changes to our AI approach impact it. Finance has implemented all mandatory requirements outlined within [the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), as demonstrated by the information contained within this statementto artificial intelligence. ## Who to contact regarding our statement For any questions regard … ement, or for more information about how Finance uses AI, please email: [feedback@finance.gov.au](mailto:feedback@finance.gov.au). ## Authorisation This statement is authorised by Finance’s two aAccountable oOfficials, the First Assistant Secretary of the, Information, Communication and Technology Division, and the Chief AI Officer, First Assistant Secretary of the Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division. ______________________________________________________________________ Did you find this content useful? \_\_ \_\_ Your comments (if any) Page Submit Leave this field blank, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division.