Timeline
Every change of substance the daily scrape has recorded, newest first, each read from the diff and summarised in a sentence. Cosmetic edits (32), scrape noise (196) and first-tracked captures (121) are hidden until you ask for them. Open a row to see the words that moved.
Summaries are written by a language model from the diff; each row shows which one, and “the words that changed” is always the primary source.
How changes are classified 120 shown
PWSS replaces its PDF-link stub with a full statement disclosing AI governance, uses, and safeguards under a shared responsibility model with DPS.
read by Claude Sonnet 5- Discloses an inter-organisational AI working group and shared responsibility model with DPS (Parliament's ICT provider)
- Commits that PWSS does not use AI as a replacement for human interaction in client service delivery and does not use AI to make decisions
- Discloses current use: AI for analytics/insights and workplace productivity
- Names a PWSS AI Accountable Official, jointly responsible with DPS for safe implementation, monitoring, compliance and risk identification
The words that changed
Policy # PWSS Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement This outlines how PWSS uses# Parliamentary Workplace Support Service AI Transparency Statement The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of artifificial intelligence (AI)and details the PWSS implementation of the Digital Transformation Agency policy requirements. 4 February 2026 Last updated 16 February 2026 ## Download [ 2026 PWSS AI Transparency Statement.pdf PDF 314.17 KB ](https://www.pwss.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/2026%20PWSS%20AI%20Transparency%20Statement_0.pdf) Topics [Corporate Publications](https://www.pwss.gov.au/advice/corporate-publications)in Government provides mandatory requirements for agencies in relation to the use of AI. This Parliamentary Workplace Support Service (PWSS) AI Transparency Statement details the PWSS implementation of the DTA policy requirements. ## Approach to AI adoption and use The PWSS is committed to the ethical and responsible use of AI. The Department of Parliamentary Services (DPS) plays a central role managing the adoption of AI technologies within the Australian Parliament, including AI technologies used by the PWSS. The Parliament’s accountable officials have appointed an inter-organisational AI working group. The group was established with the purpose of collaborating across the Parliament to meet the DTA policy requirements through a shared responsibility model. The shared responsibility model recognises: - each Department or Parliamentary entity is independent but shares a common service provider that provides the core ICT services for the Parliament—DPS Information Services Division. - the use of AI by an individual or group within the Parliament may impact other individuals, groups, agencies or the parliament as a whole; therefore, collaboration is essential, and consistent with the Parliamentary Department’s commitments under the Strategic Framework for the Parliamentary Service. The PWSS recognises the transformative potential of AI to enhance efficiency, improve service delivery, and support informed decision making across PWSS operations. Adoption of AI will be guided by strong safeguards to manage risks related to privacy, accuracy, bias, and ethical use. AI-generated outputs will be subject to human oversight, and sensitive data will be secure with enterprise data protection. This balanced approach ensures AI is used responsibly, transparently, and in alignment with APS values and public trust. ## How the PWSS uses AI The PWSS uses AI to support analytics for insights and enhance workplace productivity to produce a more consistent output than manual processing. The PWSS does not use AI as a replacement for interaction with human officers in any client service delivery functions and does not use AI to make decisions. ## AI Safety and governance Under the shared responsibility model, PWSS will partner with DPS to align with the APS AI Plan and the DTA’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. DPS as the ICT system owner and the PWSS AI Accountable Official are together responsible for: - ensuring that any AI is implemented safely and responsibly - monitoring the effectiveness of the deployed AI tools - legal and regulatory compliance of the ICT system - identifying potential negative impacts of AI use casesHome Affairs replaces its February 2025 PDF statement with a March 2026 rewrite, naming SmartGate and Copilot, a Chief AI Officer role and new governance commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitment: no AI system makes administrative decisions or takes actions affecting individuals without human review
- Discloses SmartGate as the only public-facing AI interaction, and Microsoft 365 Copilot as an approved generative AI tool
- Chief Data Officer now also acts as Chief AI Officer under the APS AI Plan 2025, with adoption/innovation duties
- Adds a new 'policy and legal' AI domain; expands law enforcement use to predictive cargo/security models and email triage
The words that changed
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL AI Transparency Statement\ February 2025 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 1 of 3 AI Transparency Statement Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 What is Artificial Intelligence? ................................................................................................................. 2 Accountable Officials .............................................................................................................................. 2 Domains of AI Usage.............................................................................................................................. 2 AI Governance ........................................................................................................................................ 3 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 2 of 3 AI Transparency Statement\ Introduction\Published # AI Transparency Statement Page Content The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) (the policy)mandatrequires all departments and agencies todesignateappoint accountable officialsfor thto oversee policy implementation, and. It also requires them to publish a statementoutlexplaining their approach to AI adoption and use, known as a(‘transparency statement’) .\. The Department of Home Affairs, including ABF (the department)is responsible for providing services, policy, and regulation across a range of domains including immigration and border protection, citizenship, cyber and national security. In delivering its role effectively and efficiently, t, published its first Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement in February 2025. The departmentincorporupdatesd the safe and responsible use of data and enabling technologies including various forms of Artificial Intelligence (AI).\ What is Artificial Intelligence? Following the DTA, the department adopts the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of an AI system:\ ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’\is statement in March 2026. The updated statement below explains how the department uses AI safely and responsibly, in line with whole-of-government policy and oversight from our Accountable Official. It also outlines how we use AI to support our functions, manage risks, and strengthen governance, transparency and accountability as AI continues to evolve. ## Accountable Officials\The Chief Data Officer (CDO) is the Accountable Official for AI under the policy and is responsible for leading, policy- monitoring andement,ing AI policies - ensuring robust and ethical AI design and management, and implementation of- overseeing governance andDomains of AI Usage The department embraces opportunities presented by emerging technoloThe CDO also performs the role of the Chief AI Officer as required under the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). Under this role, the CDO: - drives AI adoption - advocates for strategic change within the department - oversees experimentation and innovation - givesby developing and adopting AI systems inguidance and use cases, shares advice and supports internal engagement. ## AI usage in the department The department continues to invest in emerging technologies, including AI, to supportofdecision-‑making, riskmitigation andmanagement,and administrative actionvities in a safemanner. The department uses AI to boost productivity by optimising processes across various domains:\ Service Delivery: with a range of systems toway. Importantly, no AI system makes administrative decisions or takes actions that affect individuals without human review. Currently, the department’s only public-facing AI-based interaction is through SmartGate. SmartGate uses AI-driven image processing technology to help eligible passengers move through airports more quickly. This improves efficiencyof department’s service to clients such asand convenience for travellers while supporting the department’s operational objectives. The department uses AI across the following [domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - Service delivery: AI systems use image processing technology and automated registration of submissionsand, applications; or image processing systems to facilitate passenger movements.\ Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security: the trained AI systems use advanced analytics for insights to inform a data-driven approach to risk identification, intelligence gathering and crime prevention. Corporate and Enabling: the explorative use of AI systemsand email triage to speed up service delivery to clients. - Compliance and fraud detection: AI-derived analytics for insights help identify persons and consignments of interest. - Law enforcement, intelligence and security: predictive models use data to supportadministrative tasks and research leading to faster generation of products for internal use such as feedback analysis of large surveys to derive key learnings that enable organisational growth and transformationpotentially suspicious cargo and identify security concerns that could help prevent crime. - Policy and legal: AI analytical tools support research, information synthesis and evidence gathering to inform policy development and legal analysis.- Compliance and Fraud Detection: AI systems are used to identify and share information with partners to supplement compliance activities, keeping the Australian community safe and ensuring the integrity of Australia's migration program.rporate and enabling: approved generative AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot, support workplace productivity and do not make administrative decisions about individuals. ## AI governance The department usesbothinternal and third, with ongoing human monitoring and decision making to ensure AI use is safe, legal and ethical. OFFICIAL OFFICIAL Page 3 of 3 AI Transparency Statement\ AI Governance The department is committed to transparency and accountability in using AI, ensuring responsible implementation as the technology evolves. To ensure safety, security and ethical use of its AI systems, the department has implemented a number of controls for governing, monitoring and managing AI-related risks by: aligning Home Affairs’ AI Ethics Policyin a safe and responsible manner to improve operations and maintain community trust. We are developing an AI Strategy and Data and AI Governance Framework to clearly guide how we use and manage AI systems. Our approach aligns with whole-of-government strategic directions, including the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) and the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan). - **Ethical and rights-respecting use:** Our ethical approach to AI use aligns with [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and making the policy compliant with both international and Australi](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles). This ensures we are consistent with relevant human rightslegislation, such asand anti-discrimination obligations. These obligations include the _Racial Discrimination impleme_ as well as relevant ing processes and procedure, to enable continuous and transparent improvement of AI systems embedding human monitoring, verification, and interventionternational human rights commitments. - **Visibility, safeguards and continuous improvement:** The department keeps a registry of all AI technologies currently in operation to ensure strong oversight. We update this registry regularly to record each system’s associated risks and the controls used at each stage of the AI lifecycle. Tracking this information helps us to maintain robust governance with safeguards that match each system’s level of risk. - **Scalable AI**\*\*:\*\* By leveraging scalable AI systems alongside human oversight, we allow staff to dedicate their attention to complex and mission-critical tasks. This approach ensures that all decisions and outcomes produced by automation allnd AIsystem-generated outputs monitoring and mitigating AI distinct andremain subject to human verification at every stage. - **Ongoing assurance, monitoring and secure environments:** We monitor and manage AI-specific risks and potential harms toincluding privacy, fairness,as well as, safety and securityof its technology environments delivering a comprehensive data and AI literacy program to its workforce.. Assurance mechanisms and operation in secure technology environments support this work. - **Workforce capability:** We commit to improve AI and data skills across the department through comprehensive training. All staff must complete the mandatory AI in Government Fundamentals training to ensure we use AI tools responsibly and securely. ## More information If you would like further information, please email [ourdata@homeaffairs.gov.au](mailto:ourdata@homeaffairs.gov.au)Updates unrelated transparency data on the same page — adds 2025-26 legal expenditure figures and links the Q4 gifts and benefits register — leaving the AI content untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ype**| **2020-21**| **2021-22**| **2022-23**| **2023-24**| **2024-25**\| **2025-26**\ ---|---|---|---|---|---|---\ **External Legal Expenditure**| $19,329| $15,329| $56,888| $32,812| $129,034| $62,374\ **Internal Legal Expenditure**| $681,199| $863,219| $1,070,294| $1,090,320| $919,340| $734,231\ **Total Legal Expenditure**| $700,528| $878,548| $1,127,182| $1,123,132| $1,048,374| $796,605 ## Gifts and Benefits Register In accordance with the Australian Pu … Benefits Register](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/IGIS8/2025_2026%20Q4%20Gifts%20and%20Benefits%20Register%20Q3%202025-26.pdf.PDF) ## Consultant Services Expenditure The Office makes public the ann …Changes the spelling of "focussing" to "focusing"; no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… Archives is using AI only in the corporate and enabling domain, focussing on refining ways of working and trialling AI functionality that en …Rewrites the statement end to end: names a Chief AI Officer, discloses AI analysis of public consultation submissions, and softens its no-public-facing-AI commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- Appoints a Chief AI Officer (Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division) under the APS AI Plan
- New disclosure: AI analyses submissions to the Consultation Hub, with privacy notice, consent and human review
- Absolute commitment not to use AI where the public directly interacts or feels significant impact weakened to 'not currently' and 'without human review'
- Adds detailed usage patterns (productivity, analytics, decision support) and domains (corporate, policy and legal, service delivery)
The words that changed
# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated:7 April25 August 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebo … opting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI).Our own adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essWe use AI to support staff in their work. We do not use AI to make decisions that affect people or organisations without human oversight. This statement explains how we use AI and the safeguards we have in place. We review this statement at least annually and update it when our use of AI changes. ## Our use of AI We use AI to support staff to work more effectively and efficiently, and to deliver better outcomes. Most departmentialpractices](https://www.industry.gov.au/node/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability practices for developers and deployers of AI systems. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Commuse supports internal business activities such as drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval. Some areas of the department use AI for more technical purposes. For example, Australia’s AI Safety Institute has specialised AI uses it deploys as part of its remit. These include research and testing of frontier AI capabilities in secure environments to inform government on AI capabilities, risks and harms. The department provides advice, delivers programs and makes decisions that can affect people and businesses. Staff remain responsible for decisions and advice. They review AI-generated content before it is used and treat AI outputs as drafts or starting points for further research – not for decision-making. Our approach aligns with the [Guidance for AI Adoption](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices/guidance-ai-adoption-implementation-guidance). This guidance sets out 6 essential practices for safe and responsible AI use. We also align with the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Across the department, we use approved AI tools for targeted purposes, including routine business tasks, information analysis and specialist technical work. This helps staff focus on more complex, high-value work. ## Our role in supporting AI adoption in Australia In addition to our internal use of AI, we support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across Australia. This national role is separate from how we use AI in departmental operations. ### National AI Centre (NAIC) The [National AI Centre (NAIC)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/national-ai-centre) supports practical adoption of AI across Australia’s economy, including businesses, not-for-profits and social enterprises. It provides guidance, tools and resources to help organisations understand where AI can add value and how to use it responsibly. ### Australia’s AI Safety Institutee(AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policSI) [Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-safety-institute) researches, analyses and tests the capabilities of frontier AI models and applications, supports regulators and agencies to respond to existing and emerging risks and harms, and shapes safe AI development, deployment and international governance in Australia’s interests. ## Why we use AI We use AI to improve how we deliver policy, information, services and outcomes for Australians. It helps us: - increase efficiency and reduce manual effort - support evidence-based policy and decision making - improve consistency and quality across our work. Our use of AI complements our broader role in supporting Australia’s adoption of AI across industry and the economy. ## How AI supports our work Our current approach focuses on keeping staff in control of AI-assisted work. AI supports tasks such as drafting, summarising, research and analysis, and information retrieval, but staff remain accountable for how they use these outputs. When we use AI: - a person reviews andbest practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI relavalidates AI-generated content - AI supports, but does not replace, human judgement - staff remain accountable for decisions and advice. Our use of AI aligns with the [Australian Government classification system](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). The system groups AI by: - how it is used (called ‘usage patterns’) - where it is used (called ‘domains’). ### How we use AI In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following ways: #### Workplace productivity We use AI to help staff completedrisks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI acoutine tasks and manage information. This includes: - drafting and summarising documents - improving clarity and accessibility of countable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standardent - organising and searching information. #### Analytics and insights We use AI to analyse information and generate insights. This includes: - identifying patterns and trends - analysing information to support policy development and advice - highlighting key themes and findings. #### Decision making and administrative action We use AI to support, not replace, human decision making. This includes: - reviewing and summarising information - preparing draft advice or recommendations for human consideration - researching and analysing. These categories describe how we use AI across the department at a high level. Some specialist activities, including frontier AI research, measurement, testing and evaluation by Australia’s AI Safety Institute, may involve more technical uses of AI within these broader categories. ### Where we use AI We use AI across different parts of the department. Some approved AI tools are available across multiple parts of the department. Others are limited to specific teams, functions or types of work. In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following domains: #### Corporate and enabling We use AI to support internal operations and corporate services. This includes communication, administration and workforce productivity. #### Policy and legal We use AI to support policy analysis, briefing preparation, and advice to government. #### Service delivery We use AI to support the management and delivery of grants, programs and other departmental services. ## Use of AI that affects the public Members of the public do not currently interact directly with our AI systems. We do not use AI to make decisions or take actions that directly affect individuals or businesses without human review. Where we use AI, it: - provides insights to support staff - is reviewed and validated by a person before it informs decisions or advice. We use AI in limited cases to support consultation and engagement processes. For example, AI assists with analysing submissions received through our [Consultation Hub](https://consult.industry.gov.au/), including identifying themes and insights for human review. In these cases: - individuals are informed through the privacy collection statement - consent is obtained before AI is used - a person reviews and validates all outputs - AI supports analysis only and does not make decisions about individuals or businesses. We will update this statement if our use of AI changes, including if AI directly interacts with the public. ## Governance and oversight We have governance arrangements to support the safe and responsible use of AI. These arrangements help us monitor, review and oversee AI use. ### AI Governance Committee Our AI Governance Committee (AIGC) provides central oversight for AI use across the department. The committee is made up of senior departmental executives who: - oversee how we use AI - ensure alignment with legislation, policy and best practice - identify and manage risks - support safe and responsible adoption. ### AI Accountable Official Our Chief Information Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This role implements the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensures appropriate governance, oversight and risk management. ### Chief AI Officer We have appointed a Chief AI Officer in line with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). This role provides strategic leadership for safe and effective AI adoption. The Chief AI Officer works with the accountable official to support appropriate safeguards. The role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division. ## Managing risks and safeguards We assess new uses of AI before they are introduced. This includes considering risks and impacts. AI can produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased information. We manage these risks through governance, staff training and guidance, and human review of AI-generated content. We also consider cyber security, privacy, records management and information access requirements when using AI. This includes our obligations under the [Privacy Act 1988](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), [Archives Act 1983](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02796/latest/text) and [Freedom of Information Act 1982](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02562/latest/text). ## Monitoring and review We monitor how AI tools are used across the department. This includes whether they continue to meet business needs, staff feedback, and issues that may affect safe and effective use. We review changes to government policy and updates to AI tools. Where needed, we update guidance, safeguards and approved uses of AI. We will update this statement when our use of AI changes. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read NAIC's Guidance for AI Adoption \_\_](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices) [Read Australia's AI Ethics Principles \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)Fair Work Ombudsman rewrites its statement, adding a mandatory-requirements compliance table and new safeguards, while dropping the governance section naming its Chief AI Officer.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: governance section naming the CIO as AI Accountable Official and the CIO plus Regulatory Transformation Group Manager as joint Chief AI Officers
- Adds a compliance table against the policy's 11 mandatory requirements, including 95% staff AI training as at June 2026 and no high-risk use cases
- Reports its AI Strategy 2026-27 and AI Governance Framework as published internally in March 2026 (previously only promised)
- New monitoring measures: internal AI Use Case Register, mandatory DTA AI Impact Assessments, supply chain monitoring
The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement ##Introduction This statement outlines how the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Agency) uses artificial intelligence (AI), how AI-related risks are governed and managed, and how the Agency complies with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0 and other applicable Commonwealth AI legislation, regulations, and frameworks. The Agency is committed to aAI use We are committed to the safe and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting harmonious, productive, cooperative, and compliant workplace relations.This means that while AI systems and capabilities may provide insightsOur use of AI is guided by ouradministrative support, all decisions regarding compliance, enforcement, and entitlements, are made by authorised Agency staff. AI systems and capabilities are strictly advisory, and their outputs are reviewed and verified by our staff. ## Approach to AI use Our use of AI is guided by theAI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework, both of which comply with the D igital Transformation Agency's (DTA’s) Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0, the Department of Industry Science and Resources Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and our Agency's core operational principles. We use secure,and commercially availablesoftware (including generativeAI systems and AI capabilities)to address a variety of AI use cases, enabling our staffff to focus on high-value complex work.## Classification of AI use Consistent with the DTA’sAI systems and AI capabilities are strictly advisory: our staff review and verify all outputs, and make all decisions about compliance, enforcement, and entitlements. ## Classifificationsystem forof AI use, wWe classify ourcurrentAI use cases undersing thefollowingDTA's Classification system for AI use for domains and usage patterns; noting w. We do notushave AI use cases where the public may directly interact with AI, or be signifificantly impacted byit:AI or its outputs, without human review. | Domain | Decision making and administrative action | Analytics for insights | Workplace productivity | Image processing## Governance To ensure appropriate| | | ## Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through our AIgGovernance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated accountability roles including that of the: - AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI Accountable Official (AO), responsible for the implementation and oversight of AI initiatives. - Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role of Chief AI Officer (CAIO), providing strategic leadership, and helping drive AI adoption and cultural change within the Agency. ## Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through the Agency’s existing risk management procedures and protocols and executive oversight. The following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of AI technologies: - Risk assessments: We apply Agency risk management processes to evaluate proposed AI systems and AI capabilities, taking into consideration, privacy, security, and operational risks before and after deployment. -Framework, along with our existing risk management procedures and protocols. T he following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of our AI systems and AI capabilities, and protect the public against negative impacts. | Measure | Description | | --- | --- | | AI Use Case Register | We maintain an internal register of all our in-scope AI use cases, managed by the Accountable Official (AO). | | AI Impact Assessments | Every new and existing AI use case will undergo a mandatory risk assessment using the DTA's AI Impact Assessment tool. | | Supply chain monitoring | We monitor our AI supply chain. | | Executive oversight:| The AOI Accountable Official (AO) provides high-level oversight of the Agency’'s AI adoption to ensure it remains within the Agency's risk appetite and aligns with whole-of-government policy.-| | Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is continually monitored by authorised staff using the AI systems and AI capabilities.| AI outputs are always reviewed by our staff. | ## Compliance The Agency is compliant with the mandatory requirements in the DTA’'s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0.We have established a strategic approach to AI adoption, which will be formalised with the Agency’s AI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework in March 2026. ## Reviews, update, and contact information This transparency statement was last| Requirement | Compliant | Notes | | --- | --- | --- | | AI transparency statement | Yes | | | Strategic position on AI adoption | Yes | AI Strategy 2026-27 published internally and communicated to all staff in March 2026. | | AI Accountable Official designation | Yes | | | Accountable Use Case Owners designation | Yes | In progress. | | Internal AI Use Case Register | Yes | | | Share Internal AI Use Case Register with DTA every six months | Yes | Not shared yet because it is earlier than 6 months. | | Operationalise the responsible use of AI | Yes | AI Governance Framework published internally in March 2026 and currently being implemented. | | Staff training on AI | Yes | In progress. About 95% as at June 2026. | | Assessment of new AI use cases against in-scope criteria | Yes | | | AI Impact Assessment for in-scope AI use cases | Yes | In progress. | | Report high-risk in-scope AI use cases to DTA | Yes | No high-risk in-scope AI use cases determined. | ## Reviews, updates, and con27 February 2026.tact information It will be reviewed and updated: -at least once a year-, when we makinge a signifificant change tothe Agency'sour approach to AI-, or when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracyis accuracy of this statement. Foranyenquiries or comments regarding this statement, or for AI safety concerns, please contact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.The words that changed
… ons/AI_Transparency_Statement) _._ [Transparency Statement ](https://wwwstatic.aph.gov.au/-/media/05_About_Parliament/54_Parliamentary_Depts/542_Dept_of_House_of_Reps/Documents/DHR_AI_Transparency_Statement_2026.pdf?rev=70047e1a4fdf4a4ebff0a781e483fd0c&hash=76FFE52EF4B8A418ABD1FCEF6CD9A66A)(PDF Version) ## Introduction The Department of the House of Repres …Drops the healthdirect mobile app from the list of digital services covered by the statement.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: healthdirect mobile app from the list of digital services in scope
The words that changed
… by - health alert lines - Digital services - healthdirect website- healthdirect mobile app- Pregnancy, Birth and Baby website - Digital products (available in …The words that changed
# DPS AI Transparency Statement - [DPS AI transparency statement (PDF, 286 KB)](https://wwwstatic.aph.gov.au/-/media/05_About_Parliament/54_Parliamentary_Depts/543_DPS/Publication/DPS_AI_transparency_statement.pdf?rev=4a9c12ddaf0c4a22bf25cbd44a4b7726&hash=C5A61F6A24BC1C8C8066957C9F8BBE9F) ## Introduction The Department of Parliamentary Services (DPS) is …Drops the Chief Data & Analytics Officer as an AI accountable official, leaving the Chief Operating Officer as the sole accountable official.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: Chief Data & Analytics Officer as a joint AI accountable official
- Chief Operating Officer now the single accountable official
The words that changed
… The Australia Centre for Disease Control **Chief Operating Officer**and **Chief Data & Analytics Officer** areis our AI Accountable Officials. They are responsible for ensuring the safe implementation and use of …AUSTRAC makes minor capitalisation and date-formatting tweaks in its policy compliance section, with no change to substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… he appropriate, ethical and safe use of AI. ## Compliance with AI inGgovernmentPpolicy Under the [ _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government_](h … ible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf) (AI in governmentPpolicy) and the [ _standards for transparency statements_](https://www. … ment policy. Version 2.0 of the policy introduced new requirements onthe 15th15 December,2025 which AUSTRAC is committed to implementing. The following table … irement** | **Status**\ ---|---\ Accountable Official | Compliant\ AITtransparencySstatement | Compliant\ Strategic position on AI adoption | Compliant # …Tidies formatting only: unbolds headings, swaps ampersands for "and", standardises dashes and strips "external site" wording from links.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… bout-us/our-governance/ai-transparency-statement) Share via email ##**Introduction**The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) is committed t … omation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight. ##**How AI is used at the AIHW**AIHW uses AI, including machine learning (ML), to enhance our data a … ed as a tool to assist staff in the following areas: - Data analysis&and insights-– ML helps identify patterns, generate insights, and support predictive modelling for health and welfare indicators. - Data processing&and quality assurance-– ML is used to improve data linkage, protect against privacy breaches, assess data quality, and validate datasets. - Exploring generative AI-– AIHW is trialling generative AI tools for internal applications such … accuracy, accountability, and compliance with ethical standards. ##**Governance, risk, and accountability**AIHW ensures AI adoption is ethical, transparent, and accountable th … robust governance mechanisms, including: - AI Accountable Official –Aan AIHW senior executive official responsible for AI oversight and monitoring compliance with government policies. - AI support and advice-– AIHW has a dedicated artificial intelligence and machine learning tea … developments occur and new tools are brought forward. - AI guidelines&and best practices – AIHW policies for managing privacy, security, ethics, and responsible data use cover the use of AI. - Data privacy&and confidentiality – AI use must align with the AIHW’s overarching data … ing compliance with legislation, regulations and policies. - Training&and capability building – AIHW provides staff with training on AI fundame … l considerations through internal and external learning programs. ##**Adherence to Government policies and regulations**AIHW complies with all applicable legislation, regulations, framewor … (https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) - the _[Privacy Act 1988- external site opens in new window](https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A03712)_ (Privacy Act), including the [Australian Privacy Principles- external site opens in new window](https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy-law/privacy-act/australian-privacy-principles) (APPs) - [_Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Act 1987_- external site opens in new window](https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00474) (AIHW Act) - AIH … Frameworks - Whole-of-Government AI and Cybersecurity Guidelines ##**Review and updates**This AI transparency statement is reviewed annually or when signific … n 13 March 2025, with the next scheduled review on 13 March 2026. ##**Contact**For questions or feedback regarding AIHW’s AI transparency statement, please contact:\ AI Accountable Official – [email protected] FeedbackThe words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026 [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) [ Listen ](https://app-asoc.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=7448&lang=en_au&readid=page- …AUSTRAC now discloses public-facing AI transcribing media interviews, moves piloted intelligence-product use into current use, and reports compliance with policy version 2.0.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: statement that no AI directly interacts with the public; now discloses limited public-facing AI (human-reviewed) transcribing interviews with media entities
- Generative AI described as in use rather than 'currently trialling'
- Piloted uses (compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, intelligence products) folded into current AI domains and patterns
- Compliance updated from policy v1.1 to v2.0, adding 'Strategic position on AI adoption' as compliant
The words that changed
… y-information-use-gen-ai.pdf). AUSTRAC has not yet deployed AI whichdirectly interacts with the public oris involved in decision making and administrative action without human intervention. AUSTRACis curhas limited deployment of AI tools which direnctlytrialling the use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technology. This includinteract with the public but not without human review. This is used to assist in transcribing interviews with media entities. AUSTRAC usesienternal tools to improveprise generative AI systems to support workplace productivity andtools to supportservice delivery. As we continue to expand our use of AI, AUSTRAC will … s supporting non-sensitive research\*\*,\*\* basic secretariat support, creation of intelligence products and facilitating communications. - **Analytics for Insights:** Used t … through AI-enabled analysis of data which aids intelligence gathering.AUSTRAC is currently developing and piloting uses of AI which will impact or expand\*\*\*\* the following\*\*\*\* AI usage patterns: - **Workplace Productivity:** Support the development of intelligence products to improve operational efficiency.- **Compliance and Fraud Detection:** Identify patterns or anomalies … ernment_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20gGovernment%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) (AI in government Policy) and the [ _standards for transparency statements_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) \_\_ we are required to report our compliance with the requireme … olicy. At time of publishing, this section is compliant with version1.12.0 of the AI in government policy. Version 2.0 of the policy introducesd new requirementsfromon the 15th December, 2025 which AUSTRAC is committed to implementing. The following table outlines the requirements of version1.12.0 of the AI in government policy and the status of compliance with thos … ccountable Official | Compliant\ AI Transparency Statement | Compliant\ Strategic position on AI adoption | Compliant ## Contact information We will regularly review and update our AI p …DVA adds classification domains and usage patterns, discloses further staff chatbots, dates its Chief AI Officer appointment and adds a monitoring commitment for the veteran community.
read by Claude Opus 5- Discloses DTA use-classification domains (service delivery, policy and legal, corporate and enabling) and usage patterns (analytics for insights, workplace productivity)
- New disclosure of "other chatbots" trialled for staff queries and information gathering
- Chief AI Officer appointment now dated February 2026
- New principle: AI use is monitored for effectiveness and protects the veteran community against potential negative impacts
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated2 April13 August 2026 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance 1. Consultation w … onal, safe, responsible, and promotes accountability and transparency - is monitored for effectiveness and protects the veteran community against potential negative impacts - maintains stakeholder trust, particularly within the veteran communi … AI systems vary in their autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Currently, DVA’s AI use falls within the following domains and usage patterns under the [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - Domains: service delivery, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling. - Usage patterns: Analytics for insights, and workplace productivity. DVA will monitor usage to assure ongoing suitability of these technologies for these purposes. DVA currently has AI technology deployed for: - Statistical modelling … age models - AI‑enabled website search, which only has access to publicly availableshed information - Semantic Text Analysis (an advanced form of key word ma … yService text responses provided by DVA clients when submitting claims to support presumptive liability of certain conditions, with staff always retaining responsibility for analysis and decision … ords or personal data and does not make decisions or recommendations.DVA has commenced a trial- Other chatbots, to assist with staff queries and information gathering. DVA also expects the underpinning technology in our digital ecosystem to become increasingly sophisticated, including by leveraging AI. DVA has commenced a pilot of a voluntary, consent based, Proof of Concepttotype Claims Document Reader AI tool. The prototype document reader has been built by DVA within the GovAI Platform. Thetrialpilot uses a clear consent model to ensuretrialpilot participants who volunteer to participate in thetrialpilot understand the purpose of the tool, what information may be used during thetrialpilot and how AI enabled technologies may interact with information. Thetrialpilot will test the suitability of the tool to assist staff in processing c … Claims decisions will continue to be made by trained DVA delegates.For more information about the usage of AI in government and the domains in which they apply, please see [Artificial intelligence in government](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification).## Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation As the community would expect, DVA computer systems also support employees and decision-makers with b … and has designated an AI Accountable Official (October 2024). DVA has also appointed a Chief AI Officer (February 2026). For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our …Adds the Chief Operating Officer to the list of accountable officials responsible for AI obligations, alongside the Managing Director and Business Services Manager.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief Operating Officer added as an accountable official for AI compliance
The words that changed
… ernment._ ### **Accountable officials** AASB‑AUASB Managing Directorand AASB‑AUASB, Chief Operating Officer and Business Services Manager are the accountable officials responsible f …Adds the Chief Operating Officer to the accountable officials responsible for AI obligations, alongside the Managing Director and Business Services Manager.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief Operating Officer added as an accountable official
The words that changed
… ernment._ ### **Accountable officials** AASB‑AUASB Managing Directorand AASB‑AUASB, Chief Operating Officer and Business Services Manager are the accountable officials responsible f …The words that changed
… hich could reasonably be established from a file title. File lists: [January - June 2026](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-08/IGIS%20Senate%20Continuing%20Order%20No%2012%20-%20Files%20created%20January%20to%20June%202026.pdf) [July - December 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/202 …AOFM names its Manager, Data & Digital Solutions as Chief AI Officer, replacing a promise to appoint one during 2026, and updates the review date.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer now designated: Manager, Data & Digital Solutions
- Removed: statement that a CAIO 'will be appointed during 2026'
- Last update date moved from 12 June 2026 to 7 August 2026
The words that changed
… e of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed during 2026The AOFM has designated the Manager, Data & Digital Solutions as AOFM's Chief AI Officer (CAIO). As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](http … or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on12 June7 August 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the AOFM at [enquiries@aofm.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@aofm.gov.au).Only breadcrumb navigation links leaked into the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
[ Home ](https://www.netzero.gov.au/) Policies # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy …Fixes two garbled words, restoring "external audit committee" and "Accountable Official"; no change to substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… which is regularly updated by the executive and provided to the externAIal audit committee. We will, through the Accountable OfficiAIal and the working group, work with DPS to undertake all requirements of …Updates its Senate Order contract-reporting statement, extending the nil-contracts financial year coverage to 30 June 2026 and rewording both listings.
read by Claude Opus 5- Nil-contract financial year coverage extended from 30 June 2025 to 30 June 2026
- Wording of both financial and calendar year nil listings rewritten (with a grammatical slip, "was not been prepared")
- Change sits in the Senate Order contracts section, not the AI disclosure itself
The words that changed
… that satisfy the criteria for reporting for the following periods: -Financial years: each financial yeara listing was not been prepared for the following financial years as the NCC did not enter into any contracts that satisfy the criteria for this reporting: from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 20256. -Calendar years: each calendar yeara listing was not been prepared for the following calendar years as the NCC did not enter into any contracts that satisfy the criteria for this reporting: from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2025. There is no cost associated …Retitles the statement heading in sentence case and points the download link at a new, undated PDF instead of the January 2026 version.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ter---18-December-2025.pdf?rev=018fee8dd9dc41aface64f1aaa6e2e1a) ## AI Trtificial intelligence transparencySstatement OurAI Tartificial intelligence (AI) transparencySstatement explains how we use Artificial Intelligence (AI)I and how we comply with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Download [ AITtransparencySstatementJanuary 2026PDF | 30627KB ](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/~/-/media/Project/IPA/IPAustralia/PDF/Accountability-and-reporting/ip-australia-ai-transparency-statement-january-2026.pdf?rev=db48c1995c124e6b9a6451d808bb02d6.pdf?rev=986002d0cd054b96b8a918900c021a7d) ## Annual legal services expenditure Our total legal services expe …Commonwealth Grants Commission refreshes its statement, adding data-asset creation as an AI use, moving assurance wording into governance and updating the review date to August 2026.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds AI "underpinning the creation of data assets and analysis" to the analytics use
- Removed: specific assurance of "regular reviews and audits" and staff training programs, replaced by generic "robust governance arrangements, processes and risk management strategies"
- Moves the governance assurance sentence from Compliance into the governance section
- Review date updated from July 2026 to August 2026
The words that changed
… accountability, transparency and public trust. The CGC follows the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). The CCG is looking toand our internal policies. The CCG’s focus is on builditsing AI capability, fostering innovation and continuous improvement,and ensureing staff are equipped to use AI confidently and responsibly. ### **How we use AI** The CGC's endorsed AI applications (ChatGPT, Microsoft 365 Copilot365and GovAI) are used internally to support workplace productivity, with … apabilities, improve our advice and increase operational efficiency.The CGC employs AI in the domain (usingBased on the Digital Transformation Agency’s [_Classification system for AI use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)of, the CGC employs AI in the corporate and enabling,domain in the following ways: - analytics for insights, for example where AI is used to assist staff with coding or underpinning the creation of data assets and analysis - research and analysis - workplace productivity, for example where AI is used to assist staff with communication, document summari … iduals without human oversight. ### **Our governance arrangements** The CGC has robust governance arrangements, processes and risk management strategies underpinning the responsible and effective use of AI. The CGC has an AI Accountable Official who is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). The CGC has a Chief AI … am also holds regular training sessions on how to use AI appropriately and promote the opportunities it presents. The CGC has an AI policy. The policy includes the CGC’s strategic p … urse is available for all staff and, as outlined in the CGC’s policy,its completion is mandatory before staff can begin usingstaff must complete this training before beginning to use any AI tools. ### **Compliance** The CGC’s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [_Data and Digital Government Strategy_](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies)_National AI Plan_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [_APS AI Plan 2025_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-pl … plies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the [_Protective Security Policy Framework_](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) (PSPF) and [_Information Security Manual_](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-frameworks/ism) (ISM).The CGC have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to support the responsible and effective use of AI.Working with Treasury as our Information and Communications Technology … ceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [_Policy for responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). All CGC AI policies a … cluding this transparency statement, are reviewed and updated annually, or when significant changes occur. The most recent review of this transparency statement was inJulyAugust 2026. For enquiries about the CGC’s use of AI, please [_contact us_](https://www.cgc.gov.au/contact-us).Drops the "(v2.0)" version label from the link to the whole-of-government AI policy, leaving the substance unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… alignment with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government(v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) and will be u …Rewrites the statement, naming ChatGPT, Copilot 365 and GovAI, classifying its uses, and disclosing an AI team, AI policy and annual staff survey.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names endorsed tools: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot 365 and GovAI
- Classifies uses under the DTA classification system: analytics/coding, research and analysis, workplace productivity
- Discloses an internal AI team, annual staff survey and regular training sessions
- Discloses an internal AI policy covering strategy, staff guidance and incident response; Fundamentals course mandatory before using any AI tool
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). The CGC recognises that AI provides opportunities to improve productivity, enhance analytical capability and support staff in delivering high-quality advice. This must be done while preserving accountability, transparency and public trust. The CGC follows the [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) , which provides principles and mandatory requirements fordepartments andagencies relating to[accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability), and [transparency statethe accelerated and sustainable adoption of AI. Consistent with the Policy, this AI Transparency Statement outlines the CGC’s approach to AI adoption. ### **Our approach to AI** The CGC encourages the responsible exploration and adoption of AI consistent with the [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in governments_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/list-of-transparency-statements). This page provides details of the CGC’policy). The CCG is looking to build its AI capability, foster innovation and continuous implrovementation of these policy requirements., and ensure staff are equipped to use AI confidently and responsibly. ### **How we use AI** The CGC’'scommitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy(Opens in a new tab/window)endorsed AI applications (ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot 365 and GovAI) are used internally to support workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our analytical capabilities, improve our advice and increase operational efficiency. The CGC employs AI in the domain (using the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Classification system for AI use_](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies)policy/ai/resources/use-classification) of corporate and enabling, in the following ways: - analytics for insights,twhe[National AI Plan(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [APS AI Plan 2025(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). ### Key rolesre AI is used to assist staff with coding - research and analysis - workplace productivity, where AI is used to assist staff with communication, document summarisation and document creation. The CGC does not use any AI systems that directly interact with the public or make decisions that affect individuals without human oversight. ### **Our governance arrangements** The CGC has an AI Accountable Officialfor Artificial Intelligence (AI)who is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).### AI Adoption The CGC's endorsed AI applications are used internally to support workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our analytical capabilities, improve decision‑making procesThe CGC has an AI team to promote the safe and effective use of AI across the agency. The team identifies emerging AI capabilities, explores potential uses,andincrease operational efficiency. ### Public Interaction and impact The CGC is committed to ensuring that its use of AI is responsible, environmentally consideuse cases relevant to the CGC’s work, and encourages staff to identify opportunities where AI may assist with administrative, and in the public interest. The CGC does not currently use any AI systems that directly interact with the public or make decisions talytical and corporate functions. The AI team conducts an annual staff survey to monitor the use and effectiveness of AI. The team also holds regular training sessions on how to use AI appropriately. The CGC hats affect individuals without human oversight. ### Governance Appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the CGC.n AI policy. The policy includes the CGC’s strategic position on AI adoption, guidance for staff on the responsible use of AI in the agency as well as what to do in the event of an incident. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff andis mandatory under the APS AI pl, as outlined in the CGC’s policy, its completion is mandatory before staff can begin using an.y As a prerequisite to utilising AI tools, staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AII tools. ### **Compliance** The CGC’s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [ _Data and Digital Government Strategy_](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) , the [ _National AI Plan_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [ _APS AI Plan 2025_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). The CGC complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the [ _Protective Security Policy Framework_](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) (PSPF) and [ _Information Security Manual_](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-fra … ive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, toensuresupport the responsible and effective use of AI.TWorking with Treasury as our Information and Communications Technology provider, the use of AI is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [ _Policy for responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).### Update Frequency TAll CGC AI policies and procedures, including this transparency statementis, are reviewed and updated annually or wheneversignificant changes occur. The most recentupdate was madereview of this transparency statement was in July 2026. For enquiries about the CGC’s use of AI, please [ _contact us_](https://www.cgc.gov.au/contact-us).AEC softens its no-public-facing-AI rule, adds a GovAI Chat trial and recruitment AI guidelines, and changes its accountable official and governance committee.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: commitment not to use AI in any AEC interaction with the public, replaced by a narrower promise that AI won't independently give authoritative advice or make decisions in public-facing interactions
- New disclosure: participation in the Department of Finance's whole-of-government GovAI Chat trial
- New commitment to comply with AEC AI in recruitment guidelines informed by APSC recruitment principles
- Accountable Official moved from First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation Group to Corporate Services and Governance Division
The words that changed
… he AEC's AI Accountable Official is the First Assistant Commissioner,Enterprise Transformation GroupCorporate Services and Governance Division. The AEC has also appointed the Chief Information Officer to the role … of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework - not use AIas part of any AEC interaction with the publicto independently provide authoritative advice or make decisions in public facing interactions - comply with the AEC's AI in recruitment guidelines, which set expectations for the appropriate, transparent and ethical use of AI in recruitment activities. The guidelines are informed by the Australian Public Service Commission's recruitment principles for agencies and candidates. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to ass … assurance framework. The AEC's use of AI includes: - GitHub Copilot-– GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed … ficiency of software application development. - Microsoft 365 Copilot-– The AECisconductinged a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed version)for staff using their AEC corporate accountsto evaluate its potentialforto supporting corporate tasks and individual productivity tasks. As a prerequisite to using Microsoft 365 Copilot, AEC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AIproductivity and corporate work. The trial was completed successfully, and Microsoft 365 Copilot remains available to participating staff. The AEC's use of Microsoftco-Copilot makes certain high-volume, manual tasks quicker – this allows AEC staff to use more of their expertise on higher -value work and make more informed decisions. - Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat-– By enabling Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff, the AEC is enha … rprise grade security controls and it is not used to train AI models. - GovAI Chat Trial – The AEC is participating in the whole- of-government GovAI Chat trial, operated by the Department of Finance, through a limited evaluation involving a selected cohort of staff. The trial offers a secure environment specifically designed for Australian Public Service (APS) agencies to test the new AI capability , while maintaining government data sovereignty requirements. - Other – Some AEC staff have access to assistive and adaptive technol … and legislation ### Governance Structure Senior Executive Committee(SEC): - overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and … pproves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with theInvestmentCorporate Enabling Committee.Investment Committee: - security and risk considerations relating to AI use - strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI usCorporate Enabling Committee: - oversees the AEC's Use of AI Policy - links operational governance and executive decision-making, providing an escalation pathway to the Senior Executive Committee. Advisory Audit Committee: - established under the Public Governan … eated by AI. ### Oversight and Audits - Compliance overseen by the SECenior Executive Committee. - Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance. - The Regu … acts the existing statement's accuracy. This statement was updated on9 Februar31 July 2026 and is authorised by AEC's AI Accountable Officer. ## Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.auAdds a "Useful resources" section linking to the DTA's whole-of-government AI policy, with no change to what the agency discloses.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. ## Useful resources - [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government - Version 2.0 | digital.gov.au](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) On this page- Australian Energy Regulatorfirst tracked
The ATO discloses a new policy and legal AI domain with ministerial correspondence drafting and legal research, and now claims compliance with policy version 2.0.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds 'policy and legal' domain: drafting ministerial correspondence and summarising public content for legal/policy research
- Compliance updated from version 1.1 to version 2.0 of the AI in government policy
- Standalone staff AI policy now released rather than 'soon'
- Generative AI expansion widened to include the analytics for insights usage pattern
The words that changed
… vice delivery, compliance and fraud detection, corporate and enabling,andlaw enforcement, intelligence and security, and policy and legal. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains: - service del … - supporting AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering - policy and legal - creating initial draft communications to ministerial correspondence for review - summarising publicly available content to support legal and policy research. Under our AI policy, AI use is limited to approved tools used for a … esponsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technologyforin the workplace productivityuse. See [Examples of how we use AI](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/ato-ai-transparency-statement#and analytics for insights usage patterns. See Examples of how we use AI). ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, … ulatory and policy frameworks, and all standard laws and frameworks.At time of publishing, tThe ATO is compliant with the latest version1.1(2.0) of the _AI in government policy_. Version 2.0 of the policy introducesd new requirements from 15 December 2025, which we are committed to implementing. The ATOwill soonrecently released a standalone AI policy outlining specific obligations for staff when … AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Fraud detection We manage the myID digital platform, which pro … tics for insights usage pattern, compliance and fraud detection domain._ ### Communications content We use AI tools for creative and video …Refreshes links and wording in the code of conduct section, pointing to an updated breaches procedure document; no change to AI content.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… 2024.pdf?rev=59a7a2c9c4de42c5b7675b4cba6c856f) ##### Breaches of thecCode ofcConduct As per[section 13 of the [Public Service Act 1999](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/psa1999152/s13.html#:~:text=%281%29%20An%20APS%20employee%20must,in%20connection%20with%20APS%20employment.www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A00538/latest/text), everyone who works at IP Australia Is required to adhere to theAPS ([AustralianpPublicsService (APS) Code of Conduct.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/aps-code-conduct). Suspected breaches will be dealt with as per our proceduresfor determining breaches of the Code of Conduct and for determining sanction. [Procedures for dDetermining breaches ofcthe APS Code ofcConductand for determining sanctionprocedure PDF |390298KB ](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/~/-/media/Project/IPA/IPAustralia/PDF/Procedures_for_determining_-breaches_-of_-the-aps-code_-of_-conduct_and_for_determining_sanction.pdf?rev=42e18675965e4d69be7eb4f2ba70e319-procedure.pdf?rev=929475e48c9240c7ac7a3ed7dbb4aa33) ## Related content Freedom of information You can request copies …Rebrands as the Tax Ombudsman, discloses call transcripts and planned drafting uses, loosens staff rules on public AI tools, and changes the contact email.
read by Claude Opus 5- New use disclosed: AI generates call transcripts and case summaries in complaints handling
- Exploring AI to draft initial content, generate case studies and summarise text, images, audio and video
- Staff rule loosened: publicly available AI tools now permitted in low-risk situations; enterprise tools only 'strongly encouraged' rather than mandatory
- Confirms staff may input personal or sensitive information into enterprise tools
The words that changed
… ies of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. ## How theIGTOTax Ombudsman uses AI TheIGTOTax Ombudsman is committed to the safe and responsible adoption of AI in our servic … r the benefit of improved efficiency in our internal processes. AI isonlyused in our complaints to keep people informed of complaint progress,although we are exploring chatbot technologynd to generate call transcripts. We are exploring use of AI to create initial draft content for review, generate case studies, and summarise content such as text, images, audio and video. We have no plans to apply AI in any decision making.IGTOTax Ombudsman makes available to all staff a version of Microsoft Copilot that has … protection, meaning our data does not leave our ICT environment. TheIGTOTax Ombudsman is using AI: - in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint process and routine communications, generating call transcripts and case summaries, but not decision making - in the domain of corporate and enabling, th … - Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically. - Staff are stronglypermittencouraged to use enterprise AI technology and are restricted from using less secure forms of AI (iools at all times. These have been configured to meet our information security requirements. Staff are permitted to input personal or sensitive information into these tools. - Staff are only allowed to use publicly available AI tools in low-risk situations that do not involve personal, sensitive or protected information. - In practice, we progressively restrict the URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use). The DTA policy requires the appointment of an accountable official. TheIGTOTax Ombudsman has appointed its Chief Information & Security Officer (CISO). Our CISO is responsible for developing an IGTOTax Ombudsman implementation plan, monitoring and measuring policy implementation, … nificant changes occur. The accountable official also reports to theeExecutivecCommittee which oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI. If you have any enquiries about this statement, please contactigt@igt.gov.au. Last updated – 19th February, 2025enquiries@taxombudsman.gov.au.Reworded the unrelated gift register blurb captured alongside the statement; nothing about IP Australia's AI use changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… stralia.gov.au/about-us/customer-service-charter) Gift register Ouragency heads and staff occasionally acceptgift register lists the gifts and benefits our staff receive while undertaking official duties.To ensure transparency, we document them in a gift registerIt includes those valued above the disclosure threshold. [Read more](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/accountability- …DSS discloses new Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Agents pilots, phone-call transcription, an SES Band 3 Chief AI Officer and an approved AI strategy.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds two new AI systems: a controlled Microsoft 365 Copilot pilot and Microsoft Copilot Agents/Copilot Studio pilots
- New staff uses: speech-to-text transcription of telephone calls, and redacting information
- New compliance row: Chief AI Officer appointed at SES Band 3 (due 30 June 2026), marked compliant
- Strategic position moves from 'in development' to compliant --- DSS AI Strategy 2026-2028 approved and published
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement We are committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). The Department of Social Services (DSS) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We recognise that AI offers significant opportunities to improve productivity and enhance service delivery for the Australian community.The Department of Social Services (DSS)We governsour use of AI in line with all relevantpplicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency’s[(DTA) policy for the responsible use of AI in government(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy)(DTA policy), and best practice. ## Purpose of AI adoptionWe use AIThe purpose of adopting AI at DSS is to improve how we work and deliver services.ItAI can helpsus streamline processesand, increase efficiency. It, and provides staff withbetter tools for staff to serve the community. We are committed to using AI in ways that serve the public interest. This means improving servicesdelivery, being transparent, and upholding ethical standards. W, while keeping safety and trust at the centre of our AI adoption. ## Our current AI … _Workplace productivity_ and _Analytics for insights_ usage patterns,Staff mainlyOur staff use AI systems predominantly for: -sSummarising documents, reports and meeting notes into key points -pPreparing newsletters, presentations and web content; rewrite drafts for clarity -cCreating agendas and recording action items -gGenerating graphs and dashboards from data; summarising insights -eExtracting information and preparing summaries and redacting information -dDrafting and reviewing policy documents for clarity and compliance -sSummarising contract documents and identifying compliance risks -dDeveloping training guides and making technical content easy to understand -sSummarising risk registers and preparing risk reports with dashboards -gGenerating transcripts of public hearings and session, for examples e.g Senate Estimates. ## AI systems we use- Speech to text transcription of telephone calls. ## AI systems we use The current AI systems that we utilise are as follows: **1. GovAI Multi-Model** –wWe use the GovAI platform as a secure space for staff to test AI models … lift and supports safe trials. **2. Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS**– w- We use Microsoft Copilot in the secure GovTEAMS environment. **3. Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (DSS Internal)** –we use Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat within the DSS controlled environmentWe use Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat within the DSS controlled environment. **4. Microsoft 365 Copilot (Pilot)** – We have commenced a controlled pilot of the full licensed version of Microsoft 365 Copilot within the DSS controlled environment for approved staff cohorts. The pilot is being implemented using a staged enablement approach, with access granted based on risk, privacy, secrecy and business assessments. **5. Microsoft Copilot Agents and Copilot Studio (Pilot)** – We have commenced controlled pilots of Microsoft Copilot Agents within the DSS controlled environment, including Microsoft-provided agents, DSS-developed agents and Copilot Studio developed agents. These capabilities are being evaluated for approved productivity, knowledge management and information analysis use cases and are subject to additional governance and approval requirements. **46. Otter AI** – We use Otter AI for a select group of staff, an AI-powered transcription tool designed to convert speech into text.-Consistent with our risk-based approach, access to certain AI capabilities, including the full licensed version of Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Studio developed agents, may be restricted to approved cohorts or use cases following legal, privacy, secrecy and risk assessments. DSS AI usage does not include use cases that involve direct interaction with the public- activitiesor that would significantly affect individuals.AIoutputsare checkfrom AI tools used internally are reviewed by a human beforethey arebeing applied or acted on. This ensures technology supportsourDSS operationsbut does nowithout replaceing human judgment in areas that affect people’s lives. ## Our AIgGovernanceaApproach### Current state WeDSS takes a risk-based approachusing AI. Before we approve a new AI use case, we assess legal, privacy and operational risks to ensure compliance with all relevant laws and DSS policies. Our governance arrangements include: - an **accountable official** – our Chief Information Officer (CIO) - a **to the use of AI, focusing on identifying, assessing and managing the risks associated with the adoption and use of AI systems. We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official. We have also appointed a Chief AI Officer**(CAIO) to provide strategic leadership and oversight- an**. We have established a comprehensive AIGgovernanceCommittee** chaired by the Chief Operating Officer (COO), and including senior staff from the department’s legal, data, corporate, communications and ICT areas.framework that ensures AI is used safely, ethically, transparently and accountably across DSS. Under this framework, AI is governed through a use case-based model supported by dedicated governance committees, risk and assurance processes, mandatory legal, privacy, security and impact assessments, ongoing monitoring, and clear accountability arrangements. Every proposed AI use case must undergo a structured risk, legal, privacy and security assessment and receive approval through the department’s governance processes before it can be procured, developed, deployed or used. AI systems are not approved in isolation; approval applies only to specific, defined use cases, and use outside an approved use case is prohibited. Only approved AI use cases may be used within DSS, with each approved use case remaining subject to ongoing assurance, oversight and review throughout its lifecycle. As part of this framework, we have an AI Governance Committee to oversee the adoption and use of AI within DSS. ThecCommittee’srolefunctions includes: - guidingourthe department’s AI strategy, principles and policies - identifying, assessing and man … and opportunities - reviewing and approving AI use cases - monitoring the performance and impacts. Our existingof AIpsolicy sets clear expectations for staff. It limits how they can use AI in their work. We use technological controls that restrict access to publicly available AI tools from our ICT environment. This helps ensure AI use is secure, compliant and responsible. Eutions. The Committee is chaired by the Chief Operating Officer and includes senior representatives from legal, data, corporate, communications and ICT. Additionally, a range of existing DSS policiesalsoapply toAIthe use of AI. These include policies on: -privacy-, confidentiality-, risk management-, procurement-, archiving-, acceptable use of technology-, and cyber security. This approach ensures that our AI use complies with … ively, and meets requirements for record-keeping and accountability.WOnce implemented, we monitor the effectiveness of AI systems through robust governance arrangements, policies,and processes, and by tracking AI usage. We also engage with staff to understandhow AI affects workflows and productivity. ### Future state We are strengthening our governance and oversight to support future AI use and make sure we comply with the DTA policy, other departmental policies, and laws. We are building an AI governance structure into a mature, scalable framework. This framework will align with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles and whole-of-government standards. It will set out clear principles, roles and processes for responsible AI development, procurement, deployment and oversight. To ensure accountability, every AI use case will have approved key performance indicators (KPIs) to track outcomes, measure effectiveness and confirm that AI solutions deliver value and meet DSS goalsthe impacts on workflows and productivity. ## Our compliance with the DTA policy The following table sets out … ew of our compliance with the mandatory requirements of the DTA policy and APS AI Plan: **Mandatory requirement**| **Status**| **Comments**| **Due date**\ … tement**| Compliant| N/A| N/A\ **Strategic position on AI adoption**|In development| We are documenting ourCompliant| DSS AIsStrategic position to guide responsible adoption and use.y 2026-2028 has been approved and published to all staff| 1 June 2026\ **Accountable officials**| Compliant| We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official. | N/A\ **Accountable use case owners**| In development|We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure willDSS has substantially implemented an AI governance structure. This framework guides how we assess, adopt and monitor AI across the department to ensure r … | 1 December 2026\ **Internal AI use case register**| In development|We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure willDSS has substantially implemented an AI governance structure. This framework guides how we assess, adopt and monitor AI across the department to ensure r … r 2026\ **Operationalise the responsible use of AI**| In development|We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure willDSS has substantially implemented an AI governance structure. This framework guides how we assess, adopt and monitor AI across the department to ensure r … effective use.| 1 December 2026\ **Staff training on AI**| Compliant|WeDSS requires staff to complete mandatory AI training, including the _AI in Governm … e Digital Transformation Agency.| 1 December 2026\ **Assessment of AIuUsecCasesand& subsequent treatment**| In development|We are developing andAs outlined above, DSS has substantially implementinged a formal AI governance framework. This framework willrequireing all AI use cases to be assessed in accordance with the DTA policy.| 1 December 2026\ **Chief AI Officer**| Compliant | Under the APS AI Plan DSS has appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) at the SES Band 3 level to provide strategic leadership and oversight of AI adoption.| 30 June 2026 This statement is authorised by DSS’s accountable official, the Chief Information Officer. This AI Transparency Statement was updated on 22 Januaruly 2026. ## More information - Visit the Digital Transformation Agenc …The words that changed
… dministering IP rights. [ Cost Recovery Implementation Statement 2024-–25 (Budget update 2025-20266–27) PDF |916819KB ](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/~/-/media/Project/IPA/IPAustralia/PDF/Accountability-and-reporting/CRIS/Ccost-Rrecovery-Iimplementation-Sstatement-2024-25---WCAG.pdf?rev=058690d01eff49a7b88094cb788b9569budget-update-2026-27.pdf?rev=f13fbbb67e7e476496275d0620910adf) ##### Regulator performance framework The regulator performance fr …Only a duplicate page-title heading appears at the top; no wording or substance changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ## Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement This page explains …- National Competition Councilfirst tracked
Annual rewrite: the ABS names a Chief AI Officer, extends its chatbot from the Census Test to the 2026 Census, and adds privacy, training and compliance detail.
read by Claude Opus 5- Appoints a Chief AI Officer to lead AI transformation under the APS AI Plan 2025, alongside the accountable official
- Chatbot now serves the 2026 Census itself, not just the Census Test, with a pre-written knowledge base that doesn't learn from users and strips personal details
- New commitment: all staff using AI must complete AI training and abide by acceptable use directives
- Flags possible future AI use for testing and assurance, with no public interaction, personal or market-sensitive information, and staff review of outputs
The words that changed
# AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence Release date and time2415/07/20256 11:30am AEST In accordance with the [Policy for responsible use of A … g: - using machine learning to apply standard classifications to data, and. - using a generative AI chatbot as part of the [CensusTest](https://info.census.abs.gov.au/about/census-test). The chatbot is available on the Census website to provide help and support for the Census. - using generative AI in the development and review of written content, such as summarising documents and transcribing meeting notes.## Public interaction and impact The public will have the opportunity to use a generative AI chatbot to obtain information about the Census Test in August 2025We will continue exploring additional AI opportunities as technologies evolve. This may include using AI for testing and assurance purposes. These uses would not involve public interaction, personal information or market sensitive information. Any outputs would be subject to review by ABS employees. ## Public interaction and impact The public will have the opportunity to use a generative AI chatbot to obtain information about the Census in August 2026. The chatbot uses a pre-written knowledge base and does not learn from user input. It is designed to operate without collecting personal information and automatically removes any personal details that are entered, ensuring your privacy is protected. The public do not have direct interaction with any other systems th … ## AI governance We have established governance processes and forums which we are further strengthening to assess and review potential business uses of AI. These arrangements … pproach to the adoption of AI, particularly for public facing systems. All ABS staff who use AI are required to complete AI training and must agree to abide by ABS AI acceptable use directives. We use forms of AI which are transparent and traceable, presenting l … nce with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies.We comply with the Policy for responsible use of AI in government and have: - designated policy implementation to an accountable official, - made this publicly available statement outlining our approach to AI adoption and useOur approach to AI has considered the Privacy Act (1988) and the Census and Statistics Act (1905), and complies with these requirements. We comply with the Policy for responsible use of AI in government and have: - appointed an accountable official who is responsible for implementing the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government, - appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) who will lead AI transformation at the ABS as part of the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025, and - provided AI fundamentals training to staff. This transparency statement was published to our website on 165th July 20256, and will be updated every 12 months or as our approach to AI changes …Rewrites its statement to the DTA policy: names the CIO as accountable official, discloses actual AI uses and a 12-month review, and drops its six AI rules.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: commitment not to use AI that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by without a human intermediary
- Names the Chief Information Officer as AI accountable official, supported by IT/Security and Executive teams
- Discloses AI use limited to web search and an internal data and insights capability, measured against DTA usage patterns
- Removed: the other five PM&C-derived rules (only authorised tools, no classified/sensitive/personal input, AI not final decision-maker, justify decisions)
The words that changed
… icial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery.As tThe NZEAis currently operating on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) ICT systems and policies, our use of and approach to AI aligns with [PM&C’s AI Transparency Statehas aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.pmcdigital.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-reporting/artificial-intelligence-ai-sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency-statement) and [_Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-s. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles). Theswe havebeenadaoptedbelow. Our approach to AI transparency:, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should … an-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be … - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled, and people responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the accouneptablefor the outcomes of the AI systems. The NZEA has committed to the Digital Information Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf) Wuse of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be useAId in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Empl … tegrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles)In addition to _Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_ , the NZEA has adopted the following 6 AI principles: 1. Only AI tools that are authorised for access and use within PM&C’s ICT systems are to be deployed. 1. Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. 1. AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. 1. AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services. 1. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Employment Principals and Code of Conduct. 1. The NZEA will not use AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or interventionThe NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, tohelpensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements andtherequirementto adhere to both internal and external pols. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable officiesal.We are dedicated to fostering public trust by ensuring AI-driven processes remain **ethical, responsible, and## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to alignedwith the interests of the Australian Government** while still being able to harness AI benefitsechnology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information onPM&Cthe NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact[Help-ITSthe NZEA at [itserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au](mailto:Help-ITSitserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au). ## SearchSpells out "Artificial Intelligence (AI)" in the opening sentence, with no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
[Digital Transformation Agency policy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) for responsible AIrtificial Intelligence (AI) use sets mandatory requirements for the National Health Funding Body' …Only an "On this page" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… or%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)**On this page**## Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Transparency i …Only the page's "on this page" contents list disappeared from the capture; the statement's own text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… rrent approach to using automation and Artificial Intelligence (AI).## on this page - How we use automation and AI safely and responsibly - What we use automation and AI for - Our accountable official - Who to contactWe’ll review it at least once a year and update it if we make any majo …Only an "On this page" navigation blurb disappeared from the capture; the statement's own content is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Share Print 18 June 2026**On this page:** - The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption. - The **AI transparency statement** explains how AI is used.# Strategic position on AI adoption The PBO’s strategic position on A …Only a "Back to top" page link dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… tement, please [contact us](https://www.donatelife.gov.au/contact-us).Back to topOnly a stray "On this page" navigation heading disappeared from the scraped page; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… res/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public)- ## On this page# Our AI transparency statement \_\_ Published: 20 February 2025 \_\ …The words that changed
… and/or when significant changes occur. Page published: 27 Feb 2025##Need help? Our librarians are here to guide you. [Ask a librarian](https://www.library.gov.au/services/contact-us/ask-librarian)No change of substance; only an "On this page" navigation label and an empty heading disappeared from the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Privacy and disclosuresOn this page# Privacy and disclosures We are committed to treating complaints ser … g, document summary, content creation and basic secretariat support.######## Our _potential_ usage patterns are outlined below: Usage pattern …Only a stray "On this page:" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
On this page:The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe an …Only a "Back to top" page link disappeared from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… .gov.au) or see the details on the contact us page of the NBA website.Back to topOnly a stray "On this page" navigation heading disappeared; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement##### On this page## Introduction Jobs and Skills Australia (JSA) recognises the transf …The words that changed
… ,300,575\ Internal services | $1,551,921\ **Total** | **$2,852,496**#### Ministerial Statement of Expectations and Regulator Statement of In … ng/Employer-Statement-WGEA.pdf?rev=832ed8cd1df74be695d4125790a3493b)##Other governance frameworks Our activities throughout the year are al …Only the repeated "BACK TO TOP" page navigation links have dropped out of the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… se AI - how we ensure quality and safety - the different types of AIBACK TO TOP## Services covered by this statement While we do not use AI across a … digital infrastructure - National Health Services Directory (NHSD)BACK TO TOP## Why does Healthdirect use AI? ### To improve quality and safety H … heir time on the highest value work such as engaging with consumers.BACK TO TOP## How do we use AI? Healthdirect uses AI for the following purposes. … ov.au/quality-and-safety-of-healthdirects-triage-service-statement).BACK TO TOP## Where you may interact with AI without human assistance Healthdire … line with Healthdirect’s clinical and content governance processes.BACK TO TOP## Ensuring quality and safety of healthcare Healthdirect’s [Clinical … t.gov.au/evaluations](https://about.healthdirect.gov.au/evaluations)BACK TO TOP## Future use of AI In the future, Healthdirect will consider the use … I assistants). - Continue to improve our own workplace productivity.BACK TO TOP## Definitions ##### What is AI? AI is the ability of a computer sys … y learning from data patterns and predicting a response to requests.BACK TO TOP## How to contact us about our use of AI You can contact our Chief In … hts Officer\ Healthdirect Australia\ PO Box K411\ Haymarket NSW 1240\ AustraliaBACK TO TOPLast reviewed: June 2026Only the page's "On this page" navigation list disappeared; the statement's content is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ntelligence (**AI**) and provide for safe and responsible use of AI.On this page: - Definition of artificial intelligence - How we use AI - Public Interaction - How we comply with the DTA Policy and other legislation - Enquiries about how we use AIContent We recognise that AI presents unique opportunities to innovat …Only an empty "On this page" contents heading dropped out of the capture; the agency's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… y to improve services, inform policy, and support quality education.## On this page:The Department of Education recognises the opportunities artificial in …Only page furniture changed: the "On this page" heading and the repeated "Back to top" links no longer appear in the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 2 April 2026## On this page1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance 1. Consultation with the … government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy).Back to top## Our Approach to AI DVA is modernising its technology systems to en … ays that build trust across the veteran community and our workforce.Back to top## Robust AI Governance DVA’s AI Policy sets out principles, risk‑man … ety and oversight of AI initiatives and this transparency statement.Back to top## Consultation with the Veteran Community DVA is committed to transp … e to improved outcomes and services for veterans and their families.Back to top## Adoption of AI in DVA DVA adopts the [Organisation for Economic Co … government](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification).Back to top## Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation DVA … priate human oversight - ‘human in the loop’ is a guiding principle.Back to top## Compliance As part of our adoption of AI technology, DVA ensures c … [Federal Register of Legislation](https://www.legislation.gov.au/).Back to top## Review and Contact DVA meets mandatory requirements of the Policy … table Official (October 2024). DVA has appointed a Chief AI Officer. For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our ado … age of AI, please contact us at [AI@dva.gov.au](mailto:AI@dva.gov.au).Back to topOnly an empty "On this page:" contents heading dropped out of the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… secure, and well-paid work with the skills for a sustainable future.## On this page:DEWR use of AI is transparent, responsible, and aligned with legislati …Only a "Skip to page navigation" link disappeared from the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to page navigation# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement This page explains h …Only a "Skip to content" navigation link disappeared from the capture; the statement itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to content or footerclose info For Australian businesses experiencing supply chain volat …Only the page's "on this page" contents list dropped out of the capture; AUSTRAC's statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## On this page - Introduction - How we use AI - Usage patterns and domains - Data privacy and security - AI safety and governance - Compliance with AI in Government Policy - Contact information## Introduction AUSTRAC performs a dual role as Australia’s anti-mone …Only an empty "On this page" navigation heading dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
### On this page ###The Administrative Review Tribunal (The Tribunal) is committed to iden …No agency edit; only a "Skip to the content" navigation link dropped out of the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to the content# About ARPC [Home](https://arpc.gov.au) [About us](https://arpc.gov. …The words that changed
… xpectations for the use of AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors.##Use of generative artificial intelligence in ARC grant programs - app …Only a "Go back to top" page link disappeared from the capture; the statement's content is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… tement, please contact:\ AI Accountable Official – [email protected]Go back to topFeedbackOnly page navigation chrome ("Skip to body content", "On this page", "Back to top") dropped from the capture; AFSA's statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… irements for AFSA's accountable official and transparency statement.Skip to body content ## On this page## AI transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA … rther enquiries, contact:**[info@afsa.gov.au](mailto:info@afsa.gov.au)[Back to top](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ai-transparency-statement)Only a stray "On this page" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; AFMA's statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency StatementOn this pageThe [policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in …Only an empty "On this page" navigation heading dropped out of the capture; the agency's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Planning and priorities We set strategic plans and priorities to guide our work and the benefits we aim to deliver.## On this page## Corporate plan Our [corporate plan](https://www.acma.gov.au/public …Only an empty "On this page" navigation heading dropped out of the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## On this page## How we intend to use AI The ACCC uses artificial intelligence (AI) …Only a "Back to top of the page" navigation link dropped out of the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eral enquiry form](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/general-enquiry-form).Back to top of the pageThe words that changed
Share Print 18 June 2026 **On this page:** - The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption.Only a site-wide Acknowledgement of Country footer and banner image now appear in the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Wed, 2026-05-06 12:00 Acknowledgement of Country The NHFB acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia, and their continuing connection to land, water and community. We pay our respects to them and their cultures and to Elders both past and present. Adds a contact link for enquiries about its AI use and moves the last-update date from June to July 2026.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds an enquiries contact point (link to the agency's contact-us page)
- Last update date moved from June 2026 to July 2026
The words that changed
… never significant changes occur. The most recent update was made in Junely 2026. For enquiries, please [contact us](https://www.cgc.gov.au/contact-us).Confirms a Chief AI Officer was appointed in June 2026, replacing the earlier promise to appoint one by July 2026, and updates the statement date.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer appointed June 2026, tasked with championing strategic change and driving AI adoption
- Removed: commitment that a Chief AI Officer 'will be appointed by July 2026'
- Statement date updated from 7 April to 3 July 2026
The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement7 April3 July 2026 The Federal Court of Australia Listed Entity1 (the Entity) is c … own policies relating to privacy, data and information technology. As required by the Plan, aChief AI Officer will beas appointedbyin Julyne 2026 and has responsibility for championing strategic change and driving adoption and engagement with AI. Two Accountable Officials are nominated under the Policy and have r …Healthdirect names the AI tools behind each use, discloses website translation and GP consultation AI-scribes, and adds safeguards for translated content.
read by Claude Opus 5- New use disclosed: website translation via Google Translate, with quality assurance, consumer feedback and power to disable translations
- New use disclosed: AI-scribes (Heidi or Lyrebird) recording GP consultations on 1800MEDICARE (GP)
- Tools named for existing uses: Infermedica triage, Microsoft Copilot, Claude Enterprise, Adobe Firefly, AWS Kiro
- Links to a new quality and safety of triage service statement
The words that changed
Effective as ofNovemberJune 20256 ## Introduction At Healthdirect Australia, we are committed to deli … so known as 1800MEDICARE, and NURSE-ON-CALL helpline in Victoria) -healthdirect GP helpline1800MEDICARE (GP) - Pregnancy, Birth and Baby - health alert lines - Digital servic … e following purposes. ### Service delivery - To support the decision(also known as 1800MEDICARE, and NURSE-ON-CALL helpline in Victoria (using Infermedica triage tool). - To make tailored recommendations as to what healthcare you should seek when using the healthdirect Symptom Checker (using Infermedica triage tool). Recommendations are responsive to the information you have provided … cern. - To analyse and improve service delivery quality and efficiency.(using Microsoft CoPilot and Claude Enterprise). - To translate some information on our website into languages other than English (using Google Translate). - To assist the GPs on 1800MEDICARE (GP) to record details about the consultation in our system by using an AI-scribe (using either Heidi or Lyrebird) ### Visual content generation - We sometimes use generative AI tech … tions and graphics, that may appear in our reports and on our websites (using Adobe Firefly). - All AI-generated visuals are reviewed by humans to make sure they … nagement activities before testing and assurance by our technical team (using Microsoft Copilot and AWS Kiro). This classification of how we use AI is based on guidelines develop … ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) You can read more about the AI software and systems we use in our [Quality and safety of Healthdirect’s triage service statement](https://about.healthdirect.gov.au/quality-and-safety-of-healthdirects-triage-service-statement). BACK TO TOP ## Where you may interact with AI without human assistanc … fied professionals both within Healthdirect and our technology partner Infermedica. You do not have to enter personally identifiable information into t … tive AI. Healthdirect monitors the performance of the Symptom Checker, and our Clinical Governance team are actively involved in its management to ensure it meets national quality and safety standards. The Healthdirect website may use AI to translate content for people who speak languages other than English. Translated information is general only, is not a substitute for professional advice, and may contain errors and inaccuracies. Every translated page seeks feedback from the consumer on whether the translation is clear and easy to understand. To manage this risk, Healthdirect regularly undertakes quality assurance measures, including considering consumer feedback, targeted reviews of translations, and regular monitoring and reporting. Where we identify issues we will address these and may disable translations in line with Healthdirect’s clinical and content governance processes. BACK TO TOP ## Ensuring quality and safety of healthcare Healthdirec … mprove service accessibility, for example through language translation on our phone line. - Simplify and summarise health information to make it easier for consumers to understand and follow our advice, both in Healthdirect controlled interfaces and outside (such as in commercially offered AI assistants). - Continue to improve our own workplace productivity. BACK TO TOP … recommendations. ##### Generative AI (‘Gen’ AI) This type of AI is an emergingfield based on machine learning that can create new content, such as … Box K411\ Haymarket NSW 1240\ Australia BACK TO TOP Last reviewed:NovemberJune 20256Says a Chief AI Officer is now in place, stops naming the Chief Operating Officer as accountable official, and drops the contact email.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer now appointed, replacing 'will be appointed by July 2026'
- Removed: identification of the Chief Operating Officer as the AI accountable official
- Removed: enquiries contact address (services@cgc.gov.au)
- Last update date moved from March 2026 to June 2026
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The CGCommonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) follows the [pPolicy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital … rvice-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). ### Key roles The CGC hasdesignated the Chief Operating Officer as the aan AccountableoOfficial foraArtificialiIntelligence (AI)use within the agency. Accountable Officials arewho is responsible for overseeing the implementingation of the [pPolicy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).AThe CGC has a Chief AI Officer(CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part ofwho, working with the[AIPlan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformaAccountable Official, is responsible for championing and driving AI adoptionatin the CGC. ### AI Adoption The CGC's endorsed AI applications are use … mplies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) (PSPF) and [Information Security Manual](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-frameworks/ism) (ISM). The CGC have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, an … henever significant changes occur. The most recent update was made inMarch 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Operating Officer at [services@cgc.gov.au](mailto:ISBCoord@treasury.gov.au?subject=AI%20transparency%20statement%20enquiry)June 2026.Corrects a typo in the contact email address, dropping the stray "www." from communications@screenaustralia.gov.au.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au](mailto:communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au).Professional Services Review rewrites its statement: moves the accountable officer role to its security officer, names the General Manager as Chief AI Officer, and changes the contact point.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable Officer for AI moves from the General Manager to the Chief Information Governance and Security Officer
- General Manager named Chief AI Officer under the APS AI Plan
- New Information Governance Committee oversees AI risks and reports to the Executive Management Team
- Adds detailed reasoning (Administrative Review Council, Commonwealth Ombudsman) for refusing AI in discretionary PSR Scheme decisions
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statementPublished date 28 February 2025 Professional Services Review (PSR) is adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) in ways## Adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption of AI at Professional Services Review (PSR) is consistent with its values of being fair, transparent and professional. Adoption is deliberate and measured to support AI use thatareis safe, ethical and responsible. PSR’s approach to adopting AI ismostin accordance with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and is influenced bytheopportunities to enhance workplace productivity.PSR is engaging with AI according toAdoption of AI respects Australia’s AI Ethics principlesemphasprioritising privacy protection and security, transparency and explainability, and accountability and is consistent with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. ## Monitoring and accountability PSR’s General Manager (GM. ## Monitoring and accountability PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) monitors the adoption of AI consistent with internal policies such as ‘Acceptable Use of ICT Resources’ which expressly prohibits PSR from using sensitive or personal information on public generative AI platforms as well as relevant government legislation, regulations, policies and official guidance including the _Privacy Act 1988_ and secrecy provisions of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_. PSR’s Chief Information Governance and Security Officer (CIGSO), designated as the Accountable Officer (AO) for AI, is charged with implementing and compliance with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government across PSR. TheGM is a member of PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) which has oversight of all PSR governance decisCIGSO leads the Information Governance Committee (IGC) which is responsible for coordinating the management of PSR’s informationsand frameworks. The EMT has identified AI as an emerging risk but does not disregard its potential for improving operational processes and reporting that may inform and gain insights when applied responsibly. Tssets including AI and identifying emerging risks. The IGC regularly reports to PSR’s EMT. PSR’s General Manager (GM), a member of the EMT, ismonitoring the adoption of AI consistent with internal policies such as ‘Acceptable Use of ICT Resources’ which expressly prohibits PSR from using sensitive or personal information on open web-based generativedesignated as the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer (CAIO) in line with the Government’s [AIpPlatn forms as well as relevant government legislation, regulations, policies and official guidance including secrecy provisions of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_the Australian Public Service](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). The CAIO is responsible for driving AI adoption at PSR. The adoption of AI in PSRwill beis supported by training. ## How we use AI PSR uses AI in ways that complementsand improves onoperational efficiency while keeping a human in the loop. PSR is considering AI usage in a longer-term timeframe with specific regard to: - further opportunities to automate internal business enabling processes and in … roductivity. Any content created using generative AI is to facilitateandenhanced internal communications and in the performance of routine tasks. PSR does not use AI for any of its statutory functions administering the PSR Scheme under Part VAA of the _Health Insurance Act 1973._Decision-making within this framework is not open to machine-based inferences or unqualified interpretations(the Act). The decisionThe level of risk is such that decisions under the PSR Scheme are not appropriate for AI or automated decision makingUnder Part VAA of the _Health Insurance Act 1973_ , PSR’s administrative decision-makers may exercise discretionary power. PSR accepts the original view of the [Administrative Review Council](https://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/report-46.pdf) (ARC), that automating discretion comes with a risk of improper and invalid exercise of power. While the [Commonwealth Ombudsman](https://www.ombudsman.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/317437/Automated-Decision-Making-Better-Practice-Guide-March-2025.pdf) has more recently noted that automated systems may support discretionary decision making when properly designed and modeled, PSR remains of the view that the level of risk is such that it is not appropriate for decisions under the PSR Scheme to be made or influenced by automated systems including AI. ## Domains PSR currently applies its use of AI within Corporate and Enabling functionsfor internal communications. ## Review. ## Review This transparency statement was last updated in February 2026. It will be updated annually and following any event that may significa … further information about this statement or PSR’s usage of AI, please [contact[feedback@psr.gov.au](mailto:feedback@us](https://www.psr.gov.au/contact). [Download PSR Artificial Intelligence (AI) tI TransparencysStatement 2025.pdf.PDF6](https://www.psr.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-03/PSR%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%28AI%29%20tI%20Transparency%20Statement%202026.pdf "PSR AI Transparency%20sStatement%2020256.pdf.PDF) - 290.98") - 182.81 KB- Department of the Senatefirst tracked
- Northern Australia Infrastructure Facilityfirst tracked
- Department of the House of Representativesfirst tracked
- Department of Parliamentary Servicesfirst tracked
- AgriFutures Australiafirst tracked
Major rewrite: the ANAO names a Chief AI Officer, adds a fourth AI tool, confirms Copilot's full rollout, and adds DTA use-classification and governance detail.
read by Claude Opus 5- Appoints the Group Executive Director, Systems Assurance and Data Analytics as Chief AI Officer
- Removed: Chief Digital Officer as an Accountable Official (now COO alone)
- New tool disclosed: CTM Scout travel booking platform with an AI chatbot
- Microsoft Copilot moves from trial to adoption across the ANAO, assessed low risk
The words that changed
Corporate ## ANAO’s artificial intelligence transparency statement UpdatedMonFriday 216 Julyne 20256 Contact Please direct enquiries through our [contact page](https://www.anao.gov.au/about/contact-us). The[policy for [responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI)in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) in government includes mandatory requirements to nominate accountable officials and publish AIThe ANAO willIn embraceing emerging technologies —y — which includinges AI — the ANAO will do so thoughtfully,while managing risk forsafresponsible and effectiveuseadoption. The ANAO Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy (the policy) outline … cal use of AI, with the intention of: - reducing the risk of using AI; - enablto the ANAO; - upholding the highest ethical standards when using AI; and -increasenabling transparency in the use of AI attheANAO. The policy limits the use of publicly available generative AI t … The policy is supported by existing ANAO security frameworks, policies,and guidance. The ANAO is exploring how generative AI can enhance th … gment and scepticism are fundamental to auditing standards. This workwillcontinues througha trialthe adoption of Microsoft Copilot across the ANAO, as well as by monitoring emerging trends and learning from the exper … n Australia and internationally. ## ANAO’s use of AI tools The ANAOuses threeprimarily uses commercial, vendor‑provided AI tools within approved enterprise environments. The ANAO does not currently develop or deploy bespoke AI systems in‑house. The ANAO uses four enterprise applications that incorporate AI: - Nuix — Nuix is an eDi … calendar events) to deliver contextually aware productivity support.The ANAO is conducting a comprehensive trial of this tool in its environmentCopilot is considered low risk as it operates within the ANAO’s secure Microsoft 365 environment, does not use ANAO data to train AI models, and is subject to governance, audit logging and formal evaluation processes. - CTM Scout is a third-party platform that facilitates corporate travel bookings and features AI Chat Bot capabilities. Since this activity does not constitute audit work and involves only minimal personal information (such as staff name and date of birth), the associated risks are considered low. Therefore, an assessment under the ANAO Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy is not required. The ANAO manages AI use cases through structured governance, documentation and continuous evaluation processes. AI use cases are captured in an internal register, with outcomes and feedback used to inform understanding of benefits, risks and effectiveness. The ANAO actively monitors vendor-proposed changes to installed software within its IT environment — including and specifically for the introduction of new AI vendor-supplied functions — to identify any potential risks before the software update is installed.## Public impact and protectionFuture development or customisation of AI tools is managed through ANAO’s project and change management frameworks and is subject to additional governance, risk assessment, and assurance processes. These processes include consideration of usability, productivity, security, privacy and audit implications. ## Classification of AI use The ANAO classifies its use of AI in accordance with the DTA [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). ### Usage patterns - Workplace productivity - Image processing - Analytics for insights ### Domains - Corporate and enabling ## Public impact and protection The ANAO may access personal information during audits and applies robust physical, information and personnel security policies to protect sensitive information and support secure, responsible audit work. The ANAO is committed to the safe and responsible use of AIproducts. All AI tools and their applications will be carefully considered to ensure there is benefit to the technology anditcan be used safely and ethically. The ANAO does not use AI tools that interact directly with the public andconsiderassesses its currentuse of AI within the organisation to havAI use as low impacton the public. Given this assessment, no additional safeguards have been implemented in relation to. Existing security measures and policies are considered sufficient to manage public impact and protection risks. ## AI governance The Executive Board of Management (EBOM) is the A … rimary governing body and is responsible for overseeing the use of AI.Any AI application identified or implemented isThe Auditor‑General has approved the ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy, which establishes the framework for responsible AI use across the organisation. AI applications are recorded in an internal register and reported to theIT StrategicSecurity & Information Technology Committee,(a sub-‑committee of EBOM. The Auditor-General approved the ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy. ## AI legislative compliance The ANAO complies with all relevant legislation and has not identified any breaches in the use of AI) which supports ongoing oversight and transparency. The use of AI is also subject to governance by Accountable Officials, who oversee implementation and report high‑risk use cases, including their intended application, risk assessment and sensitivities. For audit‑related activities, AI use must be documented in audit planning and subject to defined assurance processes, including testing, validation and review of outputs. These arrangements ensure that AI use cases are assessed, monitored and implemented with appropriate consideration of risks, impact and benefits. ## AI legislative compliance The ANAO complies with all relevant legislation in its use of AI, including requirements relating to privacy, security and confidentiality. The ANAO’s Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy establishes clear conditions to prevent misuse and ensures AI is applied in a responsible, safe and ethical manner. Ongoing monitoring, risk management and governance oversight supported by the ANAO’s quality and security frameworks provide assurance that AI use remains compliant across both public‑facing and internal operations. ANAO’s existing management processes provide staff with the ability to raise concerns relating to the use of AI, including security, privacy or data handling issues. These processes support the identification, assessment and management of risks associated with AI use and are supported by the ANAO’s broader incident management, governance and compliance frameworks. ## AI policy compliance The ANAO has: - implementedall elements ofmandatory requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency policy within the specified timelines; - appointed the Chief Operating Officerand Chief Digital Officeras the Accountable Officialsfor AI within the ANAO;and - a program to- appointed the Group Executive Director, Systems Assurance and Data Analytics, as the Chief AI Officer within the ANAO; and - informed all staff of the appropriate use and risks associated with the use of … including the implementation of mandatory AI fundamentals training. The ANAO continues to review its approach in line with Australian Government policy, including consideration of mechanisms to enhance transparency and public engagement regarding AI use. **Contact:** enquiries about this statement can be submitted to the ANAO via our [contact us](https://www.anao.gov.au/about/contact) page Approved for publication by Dr Caralee McLiesh PSM, Auditor-General for AustraliaUpdates the link label for ACMA's compliance and enforcement priorities from 2025–26 to 2026–27, with no change to the AI content.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ov.au/compliance-priorities "Compliance and enforcement priorities 20256–267") outline our key areas of focus for the year. They will guide our ef … fo@acma.gov.au). [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 20256–267 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)Rewrites the statement to disclose AI supporting internal service delivery and case management, drops the "no AI in service delivery" line and the named tools.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: AI supports internal service delivery, including case management and drafting responses to enquiries, with staff review of all outputs
- Removed: statement that WGEA does not employ AI in service delivery
- Removed: named applications (automated document summarisation, virtual assistants)
- Removed: commitment to develop a responsible AI usage policy, replaced by generic "appropriate governance and controls"
The words that changed
# WGEA\_\_ # AI transparency statement 18 May 2026 [Publication](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4630) [All industries](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4406) [Reporting](https://www.wgea.gov.au/terms/reporting) [For everyone](https://www.wgea.gov.au/taxonomy/term/4636) In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy forrthe ResponsibleuUse of AI ingGovernment, the following information provides the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s (WGEA) statement on Artifificial Intelligence (AI)Ttransparency. Consistent withPolicy for Responsible Use of AI in Governmentthis policy, an AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers,from the input it receives,how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can inflfluence physical or virtual environments.DifferentAI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Whereas automated systems, rangeing from traditional rules-based systems(for example a system which calculates a rate of payment in accordance with a formula set out in legislation) through to more specialised systems which use automated tools to predict andthrough to more advanced systems that use statistical or machine-learning techniques ## Usage WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and to support internal service delibveratey processes, includingthrough the use of machine learning. ## Usage At this time, WGEA does not employ AI in service delivcase management, in a controlled and human-centred mannery. AI is not usein compliance, auditing,d for statutory decision-makingprocesses. WGEA uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corporate and enabling functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processes and automating routine tasks. Use tools like automated document summarisation and virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency, compliance determinations, auditing outcomes, or enforcement actions. AI is used internally to support staff in managing and responding to enquiries, including supporting staff in managing and responding to enquiries using approved information sources. All outputs are reviewed and approved by WGEA staff prior to use. AI outputs are advisory only and do not replace human judgement or decision-making. ## Public interaction and impactAt this time,WGEAidoes not usinge AIin any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be sigsystems to directly interact with members of the public or to make decisions that affect individuals without human involvement. All external communificantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. The WGEA is using AI in the domain of Corpotions are reviewed and issued by WGEA staff. AI is used only as an internal support capability and does not change WGEA’s accountability for the accuracy, quality, or appropriateness of information provided. ## Monitoring and accountability WGEA monitors the use of AI to ensure it operates and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivity. ## Monits intended and aligns with responsible AI principles. This includes monitoring usage levels, outcomes where AI assistance is not applied, and maintaining oversight through appropriate reportingand Accountabilitymechanisms to support quality assurance and continuous improvement. The Chief Operating Officer was designated as the accountable official on 19 December 2024. As the accountable official, the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for ensuring the compliance of AI use in accordance with internal and externaland is responsible for ensuring that AI use complies with relevant legislation, whole-of-government policiesy, andrelevant regulations and legislation within the Agency. ## Responsible AI usage policy As part of the governance of AI use in the Agency, a responsible AI usage policy will be developed to ensureinternal governance arrangements. ## Responsible AI governance WGEA maintains appropriate governance and controls to ensure its use of AI alignments withthe resourguidancesprovided by the Digital Transformation Agency. ## ContactIinformation Forienquiries or feedback regarding WGEA’s use of AI, please contactus at: [wgea@wgea.gov.au](mailto:wgea@wgea.gov.au.) ## Review andUupdatesThis AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 25 February 2025.It will be reviewed and updated annually or when signifificant changes occur. ## More WGEA policies ### [ WGEA privacy policy ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/privacy-policy) ### [ Data management and governance ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/data-management-and-data-governance) ### [ Compliance strategy ](https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/governance/WGEA-Compliance-Strategy)Corrects "COO" to "GM" on the executive team, fixes a missing space, and drops the "last updated 24 February 2025" line.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… he Policy for the responsible use of AI in government across PSR. TheCOOGM is a member of PSR’s Executive Management Team (EMT) which has oversi … of AI for managing and viewing medical records, and how PSR processes and technologies need to adapt to take account of this during a review … orate and Enabling functions for internal communications. ## ReviewThis transparency statement was last updated on 24 February 2025.It will be updated annually and following any event that may significa …NEMA adds a commitment to review and update its AI transparency statement annually or when significant changes occur.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds annual review cadence commitment (or on significant change)
The words that changed
… a.gov.au](mailto:Data.strategy@nema.gov.au). ### Review and Updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Copyright, trade marks and disclaimer Intellectual property rights pr …Drops the statement's February 2025 first-publication date, keeps the annual review commitment, and moves the classification links into a footnote.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: statement of first publication in February 2025
- Classification hyperlinks replaced by a numbered footnote to the digital.gov.au classification system
- Annual review commitment retained, though now unattached to a publication date
The words that changed
… e recognise the increasing use of AI and the benefits it could afford.\If the NCA implements any AI capability, this statement will be update … tions behind why the NCA is using AI or is considering its adoption -[classification](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)1 of AI use according to usage patterns and domains -[classification](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)1 of use where the public may directly interact with, or be significant … igital.gov.au/responsible-use-of-AI-in-government) _._ **AccountableoOfficial** The Chief Information Officer is designated as the NCA’s accountable official. **AItTransparencysStatement**This AI transparency statement was first published to our website in February 2025. This statemenIt will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to … [Contact Us](https://www.nca.gov.au/contact-us) page of this website. [1] As per the [Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)Adds a commitment to update the statement as its AI approach evolves and at least every 12 months.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitment to update the statement at least every 12 months
The words that changed
… table officials report to the MDBA Executive Board. ## Last updated It will be updated as our approach to AI evolves, and at least every 12 months. ## Contact For more information or enquiries about our adoption of AI …Adds a commitment to review and update the statement annually or whenever significant changes occur.
read by Claude Opus 5- Annual review cadence commitment added, plus review when significant changes occur
The words that changed
… u](mailto:datagovernance@jobsandskills.gov.au). ## Review and Updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.Adds a commitment to review and update the statement annually or whenever significant changes occur.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitment to annual review, or review when significant changes occur
The words that changed
… ://www.ipea.gov.au/about-ipea/contact-ipea). **Review and updates** It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Authorised by Beth Pahl\ Acting Chief Information Officer\ Acting Chief Operating Officer\ 12 March 2026IGIS updates its statement: a new Chief AI Officer, approval of one AI tool, limited testing in corporate, policy and legal functions, and staff training completed.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer changed from Executive Director, Enterprise Management Unit to Assistant Inspector-General, Agency Oversight
- Discloses approved use of one AI tool on the Portfolio Department's platform
- Now reports limited test and evaluation of AI in corporate/enabling and policy/legal functions, logged centrally
- States all staff have received foundational AI training (previously training was only promised before deployment)
The words that changed
… nt The Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (OIGIS) does not presentlyengage with the use ofuse artificial intelligence (AI) in performing ourwork. Our intent is tooversight work. In line with our intent to explore options for the use of AI, the IGIS has commencetod explore theing a range of possibilities of its use within the Office in 20256 to drive innovation, improve corporate efficiency and support our wor … o be downloaded [here](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-025/OIGIS%20Use%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%28AI%29%20Transparency%20Statement.pdf). ##### Monitoring and AccountabilityOIGIS has appointed theExecutive Director, Enterprise Management UniAssistant Inspector-General, Agency Oversight asOIGIS’ Chief AI Officer.As OIGISexplores the future use of AI in its work, OIGIS will develop and implement theis adopting appropriate frameworks to provide robust monitoring and evaluation me … ness and compliance with all government policies and requirements. AsOIGIS further explores the use of AI, particular attention will be paid … agency, with national security considerations and limited resourcing,OIGIS has not yet commenced using any form of AIe of AI for core business activities. At present, the IGIS has begun limited testing and evaluation of AI for corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions. As theOIGIS’ network is part of our MOU arrangement with our Portfolio Departmentwe are reliant on, the IGIS has approved use of one AI toolsavailable on that platform. As such, we continue to participate in discussions and forums with our Portfolio Department on the use of AI. ##### Usage PatternsOIGIS does not currently employ the use of AI. As part of our initial considerations, we anticipate that if AI is usedfor core business activities. IGIS staff have begun limited test and evaluation of AI for corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions. This test and evaluation is logged in centralised documentation. The IGIS expects that if AI is integrated into core business activities, final decisions will still be made by a human to validate the outcome … and efficiencies that can be gained using AI in corporate and enabling, and policy and legal functions which might optimise our small corporate resource allocation to improve simple administrative processes where possible.OIGIS’ use of AI will be contingent on assessment of the utility of the technology and availability on the platformswe intend toapproved for use which are supplied by our Portfolio Department. ##### Ensuring Responsible UseOnce OIGIS decides to proceed with any form of AI technology, and prior to deployment, we will ensure all staff who will use the technology willWhilst IGIS has not yet commenced use of AI for core business activities, all IGIS staff have received appropriatetraining, and that there will bfoundational training on AI use. Prior to any use of AI for business activities, the IGIS will finalise an appropriate usage framework; with anOIGIS use of AI policy in place that aligns with Whole of Government re … nfo@igis.gov.au](mailto:info@igis.gov.au). ##### Review and UpdatesThis AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 21 February 2025.It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes o … efits they accept, and all gifts or benefits accepted (valued at over$AUD$100 ex GST) must be publicly disclosed. The register is updated quarte … and Benefits Register](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-086/IGIS%20Gifts%20and%20Benefits%20Register%20Q43%2020245-256.pdf) ## Consultant Services Expenditure The Office makes public the … hich could reasonably be established from a file title. File lists: [July - December 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/IGIS%20Senate%20Continuing%20Order%20No%2012%20-%20Files%20created%20July%20to%20December%202025.PDF)\ [January - June 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025 … 012%20-%20Files%20Created%20January%20to%20June%202023.pdf) ## Audit and Risk Committee The IGIS Audit and Risk Committee is established in accordance with the PGPA Act. The Audit and Risk Committee’s role is to provide independent assurance and advice to the … More information about the membership and functions of the IGIS Audit and Risk Committee is available in the [IGIS Audit and Risk Committee Charter](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20246-054/IGIS%20Audit%20and%20Risk%20Committee%20Charter%20-%2020246.pdf) and the [annual report](https://www.igis.gov.au/resources/public …The DTA adds a commitment to update its statement as its AI approach changes and at least every twelve months.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds review cadence commitment: statement updated at least every twelve months and whenever the AI approach changes
The words that changed
… more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. **Update Publication Date** | **Update Comment**\ ---|---\ 1 November …Fills out its previously empty "Review and updates" section with a commitment to review the statement annually or when significant changes occur.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds annual review commitment, plus review when significant changes occur
The words that changed
… at [data@dewr.gov.au](mailto:data@dewr.gov.au). ## Review and updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.Austrade adds a commitment to update the statement on significant AI changes, when accuracy is affected, and at least every twelve months.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds review cadence: updated at least every twelve months
- Commits to updating on significant changes to its AI approach or when accuracy is materially affected
The words that changed
… now and for any future technologies. ### Updates to this Statement It will be updated when making a significant change to the agency's approach to AI and when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy and at least every twelve months. Update publication date| Description\ ---|---\ 18/02/2025| AI Transpar …Adds a commitment to review and update the statement annually or whenever significant changes occur.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitment to annual review, or review when significant changes occur
The words that changed
… u ](mailto:digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au) ## Review and updates It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. On this pageOnly a "Go to section" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; the agency's statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Share Facebook X Email Print### Go to section# Corporate governance Our corporate governance reflects the legislat …ACMA rewrites its statement for policy v2.0, naming a Chief AI Officer, new AI uses, monitoring measures, a contact address and future GovAI plans.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer appointed February 2026, alongside an AI Accountable Official (previously the Chief Information and Digital Officer was the accountable official)
- New disclosed uses: image processing and generation, meeting transcription, dataset analysis, decision-making support
- Adds contact point info@acma.gov.au
- Removed: statement that ACMA 'does not plan to use AI in services the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by', replaced by weaker 'does not currently deploy AI in direct interactions with the public'
The words that changed
… ernment_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20gGovernment%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities ofAI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI in the Australian Public Serviceartificial intelligence (AI) for the benefit of Australians while ensuring its safe, ethical and responsible use, in line with community expectations. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) adheresto this policy supporting its principlesuander the "enable, engage, and evolve" framework. We will be transparent in our internal use of AI technology as we explore, evaluate and adopt AI technology to benefit our work and our stakeholders. Currently, ACMA doesrequirements to enable a forward-leaning approach to agency adoption. We are committed to building AI capabilities and exploring how we use AI to strengthen the quality, efficiency and integrity of our regulatory functions while maintaining public trust. We use AI in a safe and responsible manner to support, but never replace, the professional judgement of staff, with clear human oversight and accountability for decisions and advice remaining with ACMA staff. ### AI definition In considering AI, we have adopted the OECD definition of AI, as outlined in the policy: “An AI system is a machine‑based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.” ### Why the ACMA uses, or considers using, AI The ACMA uses, and is considering further use of, AI to support efficient, lawful and evidence-informed regulation. AI may help staff manage information, analyse data, improve internal workflows and test or improve digital systems. The ACMA’s use of AI is intended to support staff judgement, not replan to use AI in services that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by. If thisce human responsibility for regulatory decisions. The main reasons the ACMA is exploring or using AI are to: - improve the speed and consistency of internal analysis, research and document handling - support data management, data quality checking and insight generation - assist software development, debugging, testing and quality assurance for ACMA systems - help staff summarise, search anges, we will update this statement to detail our use of AI. ### AI use We may employ AI across various corporate and enabling functions, including software engineering, data analytics and workplace productivity. #### Software engineering ACMA uses AI to assist in software development, debugging and testing when developing digital and data solutions and administering ACMA systems. Some of these systems are accessed by the public, but all systems are tested byd organise large volumes of internal information - improve workplace productivity while maintaining privacy, security, confidentiality and integrity - strengthen ACMA’s ability to understand technological change, including the use of AI, in the communications and media sectors it regulates ### How we use AI In line with the Australian Government [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), we use and consider AI across our active domain in the following usage patterns. ### Usage patterns\*\*\*\* #### Workplace productivity We are currently using generative AI to improve workplace productivity for staff including: - helping answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies - summarising and transcribing meetings - summarising, editing or refining documents, emails, instant messages and other content - assist in the analysis to obtain insights from datasets, including identifying patterns and trends - image processing and generation #### Decision making and administrative action ACMA uses AI to support decision making and administrative activities, not to make final decisions without human involvement. This includes using AI to assist with software development, debugging and testing when developing and administering digital and data systems. These uses support staff productivity within IT and enabling functions. All usage is subject to humansto ensure they behave as expected before they are releasedesting and review before release, including where systems may be accessed by the public. ####Data aAnalytics for insights ACMA sees benefits in using AI to assist with data and insights in t … o regulation, policy and informing advice to government on legislation. #### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI to improve workplace productivity for staff including: - helping answer questions fromand regulation. ### Monitoring and governing AI use ACMA manages risks associated with AI use through the following measures: - AI tools and use cases are assessed for risks, including security, privacy and suitability, before approval. An internal AI policy sets requirements for responsible, ethical and secure use, including staff reguarding workplace policies and entitlements - summarising documents, emails, instant messages and os to protect the privacy, confidentiality and integrity of agency data and operations. - Approved AI uses are monitored to ensure thery content - summarising and transcribing meetings ### Monitoring and governing AI use The ACMA has developed an overarching agency approach to AI and has established an AI Steering Committee to assess the opportunities and risks in using AI within ACMA. The Steering Committee considers AI use case benefits, risks, and guidelines as well as continuing to raise staff awareness of AI. An internal AI policy ensures responsible, ethical, and secinue to operate as intended and remain appropriate over time, including periodic review of performance and unintended impacts. - AI is used to support, not replace, professional judgement, with decisions and advice remaining the responsibility of ACMA staff. - AI use is overseen through established governance arrangements. Where issues or increased risks are identified, outputs are reviewed by staff and escalated, and ACMA can restrict, pause or stop the use of an AI system. - ACMA requires staff to complete mandatory training on the responsible use of AI, with additional guidance and training for staff involved in AI‑enabled systems. ### Future AI use intentions ACMA may explore additional uses of AI where it supports our regulatory, corporate or operational functions and aligns with our legal obligations, risk appetite and public trust responsibilities. ACMA will take advantage of evolutionary whole of government AI initiatives such as GovAI. Any future usage of AItools while safeguarding the privacy, confidentiality, and integrity of agency datawill be subject to appropriate governance, risk assessment and human oversight. ### Compliance and accountability ACMA’s use of AI is governed through clear accountability and opverations. Under the policy, generative AI tools must not be used unless specifically approved under a robust approval, assurance and evaluation process and staff havsight arrangements: - Our approach is supported by an AI Steering Committee that oversees AI adoption, considers proposed use cases, and assesses associated risks and alignment with Australian Government policy and ethical principles. - We appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) in February 2026 to lead AI adoption across the agency, champion strategic changeuandertaken AI training. The AI Steering Committee undertakes regular review of AI projects and solutions that are of medium to high risk to ensure compliance with the policy and AI ethical principles. ### Accountable official The Chief Information and Digital Officer is designated as the accountable officialaccelerate consistent and collaborative AI capability development across the APS. - ACMA has designated an AI Accountable Official to oversee implementation of the Australian Government Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and ensure appropriate governance, compliance and assurance arrangements are in place. We will not use AI in ways that are inconsistent with our legal obligations, public trust responsibilities, or Australian Government policy. AI will not make final regulatory decisions or enforcement decisions without accountable human judgment. ###AI tTransparencystatement This AI transparACMA will use AI where it helps us do our work better, safely and lawfully. We will use AI to support our regulatory, corporate and operational functions where it improves efficiency, statement was last reviewed in February 2026. This statement will be reviewed at least annually, or at any timeupports better analysis, or reduces manual work. ACMA will consult with staff and their representatives when considering AI uses that may materially affect work practices, roles or responsibilities. ACMA does not currently deploy AI in direct interactions with the public. We will review and update it at least annually, as our AI use matures or wheren a significant change is made toourthe agencies or the Government’s approach to AI. ### Contact For questions about this statement or further information on our use of AI, please contact [info@acma.gov.au](mailto:info@acma.gov.au). [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)Only navigation tiles for other MoAD pages dropped from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… can create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.The words that changed
… (https://www.seacare.gov.au/about-us/contact-us) page of this website.Page last reviewed: **1 months ago**The words that changed
… re.gov.au/about/contact/contact-us "Contact us") page of this website.Page last reviewed: **1 months ago**- Future Fund Management Agencyfirst tracked
NHMRC discloses a new "research and analysis support" use of generative AI and adds safeguards limiting it to support functions with staff verifying outputs.
read by Claude Opus 5- New AI application category: research and analysis support (summarising, structuring analyses, drafting reports and publications)
- New commitment that GenAI is limited to support functions and does not replace human authorship, decision-making or accountability
- New commitment that staff must verify accuracy and appropriateness of all AI-assisted outputs
- Workplace productivity bullet broadened to refining content in publications and briefing materials
The words that changed
… r work to support the overall mission of building a healthy Australia.The contact email in the enquiries line now appears as a clickable mailto link rather than plain text, with no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… es about Screen Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [email protected]communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au](mailto:communications@www.screenaustralia.gov.au).The PBO adds a new strategic position on AI adoption above its existing transparency statement, published mainly as a one-page graphic, and updates the page date.
read by Claude Opus 5- New "Strategic position on AI adoption" section setting an organisation-wide approach, citing its high-trust parliamentary environment and quality, confidentiality and accountability
- Strategic position conveyed as an image rather than page text, so its detail is not machine-readable
- Transparency statement demoted to a subsection under re-levelled headings; date moves from 23 February to 18 June 2026
The words that changed
Share Print23 February 2026 # Introduction18 June 2026 **On this page** The **strategic position** sets our overall direction for AI adoption. The **AI transparency statement** explains how AI is used. # Strategic position on AI adoption The PBO’s strategic position on AI adoption sets a clear, organisation-wide approach to how we use AI to support our work. It reflects our role in a high‑trust parliamentary environment, balancing the opportunities of AI with the need to maintain quality, confidentiality and accountability.  # AI transparency statement The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) is committed to the responsibl … r when significant changes to the use or governance of AI use occur. ## AI Adoption and Use The PBO believe that as with any technology, AI … use of AI and the implementation of the shared responsibility model. ## AI Safety and Monitoring The PBO have implemented controls to manag … ouraged to raise issues directly with DPS IT and DPS Cyber Security. ## Contact For further information about the adoption of artificial in …Minor rewording of the usage-patterns bullet on workplace productivity, with no change to the AI uses described.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… primary focus is on workplace productivity to facilitate communicationsuch as, document summarisation and content creation. - Domains: our AI applic …Discloses AI use in evaluating Digital Marketplace Panel 2 applications and shifts primary policy responsibility from the CTO to the AI Branch Manager.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: AI used in part of the Digital Marketplace Panel 2 evaluation, following the AI assurance framework with external probity, privacy and technical advice
- Primary responsibility for cross-government coordination moved from the CTO to the AI Branch Manager
- Change log entry added for 17 June 2026 noting updated accountable official details
The words that changed
… Gilmartin_](https://www.directory.gov.au/people/tom-gilmartin). TheCTOAI Branch Manager has primary responsibility for the following areas of the AI policy: … commendations on submitted applications to a human decision maker:** - By leveraging AI for a part of the evaluation process for Digital Marketplace Panel 2 applications. The use of AI followed the Australian Government AI assurance framework and was implemented with external probity, privacy and technical advice. - By leveraging AI to support the assessment process, the DTA can enha … ecember 2025 | - Update stating Copilot and AI DMP2 are now in use. 17 June 2026 | - Revised and updated to align with current AI Transparency Statement requirements. - Updated Accountable Official details. - Included reference to the use of AI in DMP2 evaluation process. For further information or enquiries about the DTA’s adoption of artif …Discloses internal trials of Microsoft Copilot and other Microsoft AI tools, bans public AI use, and adds a table of compliance status against the DTA policy.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: coordinated trial of premium Microsoft Copilot for staff, plus pilots of other Microsoft AI for software development and cyber security automation
- New commitment: all AI with access to Tribunal data stays in the controlled technical environment; use of public AI is prohibited
- Adds a mandatory-requirements compliance table, flagging accountable use case owners, internal use case register and operationalising responsible AI as 'in development' with a 1 December 2026 due date
- Staff training renamed to 'AI in Government: Unlocking Innovation with Accountability'; references APSC/DTA courses
The words that changed
### On this page ### The Administrative Review Tribunal (The Tribunal) is committed to iden … ising AI services for the purposes of undertaking its [review decision,intends to use, AI in the domains of service delivery, corporate and enabling service … use in the Tribunal #### Current services (meeting the definition) **External facing:** The Tribunal provides ReadSpeaker and Google Translate services for users of our website. ReadSpeaker and Google Translate servicesfor Tribunal website users do not requireoperate without Tribunal staffto operate.involvement. No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of the services provided.-For example, forecasting future demand trends for Tribunal services. - **Workplace productivity (corporate and enabling functions):**-For example, fast query engagement to controlled internal policy docu … - **Compliance and Fraud Detection (corporate and enabling functions):**-For example, analysing large internal service logs for performance im … use of AI. #### Training and assistance The Tribunal has developed "safe use of AIAI in Government: Unlocking Innovation with Accountability" training which is mandatory for staff, contractors and consultants.aAccountableoOfficial under the policy is the Chief Information Officer (CIO). - The … Management Committee and Principal Registrar/CEO under the Tribunal’snormativegovernance framework, and any use of AI services must be approved through this mechanism. - … - The Senior Management Committee is actively involved when reviewingany and allpotential uses for AI services. #### Compliance with applicable legis … make any significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. The following table sets out an overview of our compliance with the mandatory requirements of the DTA policy: Mandatory requirement| Status| Comments| Due date\ ---|---|---|---\ **AI transparency statement**| Compliant| N/A| N/A\ **Strategic position on AI adoption**| Compliant| We have developed and communicated our strategic position on AI adoption.| N/A\ **Accountable officials**| Compliant| We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official.| N/A\ **Accountable use case owners**| In development| Accountable use case owners are designated for each AI use case. We are documenting a process to assess and implement AI use cases with accountable owners. | 1 December 2026\ **Internal AI use case register**| In development| We have established a team to lead AI initiatives and to build out relevant use cases for the Tribunal.| 1 December 2026\ **Operationalise the responsible use of AI**| In development| We are developing supporting frameworks, strategies and processes to embed responsible AI practices in the Tribunal.| 1 December 2026\ **Staff training on AI**| Compliant| We require staff to complete mandatory AI training, including the AI in Government Fundamentals course. We also encourage further learning through programs offered by the Australian Public Service Commission and the Digital Transformation Agency.| N/A\ **Assessment of AI use cases and subsequent treatment**| Compliant| We have established a team to lead AI initiatives and to develop relevant use cases for the Tribunal, Ongoing assessment of AI use cases will be conducted by this team.| N/A ### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further info …No change to APRA's text; the capture differs only in heading formatting and the loss of page navigation and subscribe chrome.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# APRA's AI Transparency StatementIn accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy f … es. (DTA domains of Corporate and Enabling, and Workplace Productivity**Accountable Officials:**APRA has designated a panel consisting of the Executive Director – T … governed, is safe and that risks are identified and addressed. ####**Training and assistance:**All staff must complete mandatory training on the appropriate use of … ns or issues. APRA has adopted Copilot as its preferred AI tool. ###**Compliance with Legislation and Regulations**APRA ensures AI usage complies with Australian legislation, such as … ian Government's Policy for responsible use of AI in government. ###**Statement Review and Updates**This statement will be updated as and when APRA’s approach to AI cha … fect the statement’s accuracy, and at least every twelve months. ###**Contact Information**For inquiries about APRA's AI use, please email: [aiao@apra.gov.au](mailto:aiao@apra.gov.au).[ Previous page: Disclaimer ](https://www.apra.gov.au/disclaimer) [ Next page: Privacy ](https://www.apra.gov.au/privacy) #### Subscribe for updates To receive media releases, publications, speeches and other industry-related information by email [Subscribe](https://www.apra.gov.au/newsletter-signup)## Footnotes- Cancer Australiafirst tracked
Adds new AI safety, risk management and monitoring sections with named controls, details its governance arrangements including an AI focus group, and updates the review date.
read by Claude Opus 5- New 'AI Safety and Risk Management' section listing controls: approved tools only, no sensitive data in public AI tools, human oversight, alignment with existing frameworks
- New 'Monitoring and Evaluation' section, conceding performance measurement frameworks are basic
- Governance now described as integrated into existing management, risk and information governance, including a specialised AI focus group
- Public-interaction commitment broadened: AI not used in decision-making or service delivery and does not directly impact the public
The words that changed
… %20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation atTreasurythe AOFM. **AI Adoption** The AOFM receives information and communication te … enhance our operational efficiency. **Public Interaction with AI**The AOFM does not use AI in ways that thaAI is not used in decision-making or service delivery, does not directly impact members of the public, and does not involve direct interaction with the public, and decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at the AOFM has human oversight. **Governance of AI**AppropriateGovernance of AI at the AOFM is integrated into existing management, risk and information governance arrangementshave been estabincluding a specialishedto support AI within the AOFMAI focus group. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundame … e of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). **AI Safety and Risk Management** The AOFM applies a proportionate approach to managing risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence. Current controls include: - restricting AI use to approved tools within the Treasury ICT environment - prohibiting the entry of sensitive, classified or market‑sensitive information into public AI tools - maintaining human oversight of all AI‑assisted outputs, and - aligning AI use with existing governance frameworks, including information security, privacy, records management and APS Values As AI use evolves, the AOFM will continue to assess and manage risks associated with accuracy, bias, data handling and appropriate use, and will adapt controls as needed to ensure safe and responsible use. **Monitoring and Evaluation** The AOFM monitors the use of AI within the agency to assess its effectiveness and ensure it remains appropriate and aligned with policy requirements. Current monitoring activities include: - initial cost, risk and benefit assessments of AI use cases and tools across the agency - oversight through existing governance forums and management structures - monitoring developments in whole-of-government policy and guidance Given the current limited and low-risk use of AI, performance measurement frameworks are basic. As AI adoption increases, the AOFM will strengthen monitoring and evaluation arrangements to assess effectiveness, benefits and risks on an ongoing basis. The AOFM maintains visibility of AI use through internal oversight and reporting mechanisms appropriate to its scale and level of adoption. **Update Frequency** AOFM’s transparency statement is reviewed and up … or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on28 February12 June 2026 For further enquiries, please contact the AOFM at [enquiries@aofm.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@aofm.gov.au).Replaces planned AI work with an active pilot, naming Lexis+ AI with Protégé and Westlaw Precision for legal research, and listing permitted uses and limits.
read by Claude Opus 5- Discloses an active AI pilot governed by an internal framework, replacing 'planned AI work'
- Names LexisNexis Lexis+ AI with Protégé and Thomson Reuters Westlaw Precision Australia (AI-Assisted Research) for legal research
- Lists approved uses: operational efficiency, summarising, meeting notes, drafting, legal research and analysis
- Commits that AI is not used for legal reasoning, independent analysis, or inquiry findings and recommendations
The words that changed
… meeting support, and drafting and summarising routine material). ##**Planned AI work** In February 2026, the ALRC established aCurrent trials and pilot use of AI We are trialling the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to support ALRC staff to working group to assess broader AI use, including potential trials for inquiry-adjacent tasks such as submission analysis support, proofing and document handling (subject to governance and approval). The group is also considering legal-specific tools (for example, Lmore effectively and to assist with our responsibilities in a controlled and low‑risk way. This pilot is governed by an internal framework that sets out approved tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot for productivity and operational efficiency and selected legal AI tools — LexisNexisNLexis+ AI+ and Westlaw Edge) for possible future legal research support, noting thewith Protégé and Thomson Reuters Westlaw Precision Australia with AI‑Assisted Research — to support legal research, analysis and synthesis. In this pilot, AI may be used tools are not currently use: - support operational efficiencies, such as calendar and email management - summarise andforinquiry work. We have internal guidance and a SharePoint page on the use of AI tools. Staff are required to confirm and acknowledge theganise information from approved documents and materials - prepare meeting notes, transcripts, summaries and action items - assist with internal planning, coordination and other operational tasks - help draft and refine internal and / or non-sensitive content and routine correspondence - support legal research, drafting and analysis including by: - identifying potentiallyarefamiliar with this guidance before accessing AI tools. Our guidance reminds staff to verify AI-generated content and to avoid sharing or copylevant cases, legislation and other sources - identifying themes, issues and patterns in academic, consultation or submission material - summarising legal materials - comparing approaches across jurisdictions - checking whether sources support a stated proposition - assisting with editing, proof reading and spelling and grammar checking legal and policy work. AI is not being trialled to produce substantive ALRC work from scratch – it is not being usensitive material into AI tools, consistend in legal reasoning, to substitute independent analysis, or to produce inquiry findings or recommendations. AI supports staff, butwith relevant Australian Government security and privacy requiremdoes not replace human judgement. All AI outputs are reviewed, verified against source material, and refined before use. ALRC staff remain accountable for all decisions and final contents. ## **AI safety and governance** Within the ALRC, all AI use cases …Austrade rewrites its statement for the Standard 2.0: Copilot now available to all staff, new safeguards, social-media monitoring tools, and revised governance arrangements.
read by Claude Opus 5- Microsoft 365 Copilot moved from a limited trial to all staff, with mandatory AI Foundations training and an acknowledged AI use policy
- New commitment: not using AI in ways the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by without human review
- New disclosure: tools with AI features monitor public digital channels and social media; service delivery added as a domain
- Governance shifted from the Digital and Technology Steering Committee to a new AI Working Group; CIDO and COO oversight added over the Accountable Official
The words that changed
… de-resilience-service) for the latest updates and support available. ## Introduction Austrade is committed to transparency in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This statement outlines how we responsibly implement AI in line with government policy. ## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition of AI in line with thep[Policy for“Rthe responsibleUuse of AI inGgovernment”](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) developed by the Digital Transformation Agency. The definition state … y in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”_ ##HowAustradeuses AI Austrade does not currently use AI on a wide scale. The only approved tools in use currently include the Microsoft 365 CoPilot virtual assistant - this tool is currently being trialled by a limited number of users; and some machine learning models which use trade data to identify new export opportunities and potential markets for Australian exporters. Austrade is interested in understand’s approach to AI adoption and use Austrade is adopting AI to strengthen internal productivity, improve how we analyse data to support decision-making and modernise ways of working. We use AI to support agency objectives and align with whole-of-government digital and AI policy, while endeavouring to ensure AI is implemented in a safe and transparent manner appropriate for the Australian Government. Austrade is committed to demonstrating, encouraging and supporting the safe and responsible adoption of AI within the Australian Public Service. ### How Austrade uses AI Austrade is using AI for workplace productivity and analytics for insights. These complement service delivery and corporate enabling activities. Austrade participated in the Australian Government’s trials for Microsoft 365 Copilot. Austrade has since made Copilot available to all staff. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, Austrade staff are required to complete AI Foundations training on thepotential application and usage of other AI tools across our functions and to do this we will continue to undertake active research and testing with AI technologies. Austrade is also engaging in the Government’s AI CoLab Alliance, supported by the APS Capability Reinvestment Fund. When Austrade approves solutions for use, this transparency statement will be updated accresponsible and ethical use of generative AI, regardless of their role. We also have a policy on the use of AI tools, which staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing generative AI tools online. The policy and training empowers staff to: - Be personally accountable for the use of AI outputs including the ability to explain and justify any advice or decisions based on those outputs. - Review and verify all AI outputs in full including for potential biases and discrimination against any individual or group. - Be transparent and disclose when AI is used in material for clients, partners or the public. - Restrict the entry of sensitive or classified information, including sensitive client or personally identifiable information into publicly available AI tools. Austrade uses tools with AI features to support monitoring of publicly available digital channels and social media. At this time, we are not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without human review. ## Classification of AI system use cases Austrade is exploring the application of AI technologies across its operations. This includes research and testing of various AI tools to understand their potential in suppordtingly. Austrade maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns:** supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staffstrategic outcomes. AI use cases are documented in an internal register to monitor their development and status. For AI applications that are being assessed, we use a structured approach to track progress and evaluate outcomes. Austrade currently uses AI in the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) as defined by the [Standard for AI Transparency Statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai-transparency-statements). Austrade is committed to complying with whole of government requirements applicable to AI. ### Usage patterns: - Workplace productivity - Austrade is strengthening workplace productivity and team collaboration with Copilot, a generative AI tool. Copilot automates repetitive tasks, summarises documents, generates draft emails and reports, and assists with data analysis. This enables staff to focus on more complex work and reduces time spent on manual processes. - Analytics for insights - Austrade leverages tools with AI features to monitor public digital chanfocus on more complex work. - **nels and social media, to quickly identify valuable information and automate reporting. These tools improve efficiency in gathering insights and support evidence-based decision-making. ### Domains:**- Corporate and Enabling–- Supporting our corporate functions, including HR, finance, media and … s, optimising resource allocation and improving operational efficiency - Service delivery - AI supports staff in delivering trade and investment services to make their work more efficient. This enhances service quality and responsiveness to client needs. ## Monitoring and Governance ### Accountable Officials The Head of Digital Products and Platforms (HoDPP), is the designated Accountable Official (AO) for all AI matters, with oversight by the Chief Information and Digital Officer (CIDO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO). They are responsible for Austrade's implementation of the whole-of-government Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government. They are alsoAO is responsible for ensuring the following: - AI is implemented safely and responsibly. - AI is only used under human supervision. -TheDeployed AI systems and outputs of AI models are monitored for effectiveness. - AI use complies with all relevant legislation and regulation regarding Privacy and AI. - AI use cases are assessed for potential negative impacts. Any proposed AI solutions must be reviewed and considered by Austrade’sDigital and Technology Steering CommitteeAI Working Group and adhere to Australia’s [AI Ethics Principles. A security risk management plan needs to be developed for any potential AI tool put forward for use, as](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). For each AI tool, a security risk management plan and system authorisation is required prior to deployment. As AI technologies continue to evolve, Austrade weillas an ethics assessment. As our AI maturity increases, we will continue to evolve our governance processes and ensure that our staff are trained in how to use AI safely and ethically.maintain and strengthen its governance processes, ensuring that all staff are trained to use AI safely, both now and for any future technologies. ### Updates to this Statement Update publication date| Description\ ---|---\ 18/02/2025| AI Transparency Statement approved and published\ 02/06/2026| Updated to reflect Austrade’s current state on AI adoption\ Brings Austrade up to date with DTA’s Standard for AI transparency statements 2.0 For further enquiries please visit our [Contact us](https://www.austrade.gov.au/en/contact-us) page. ## Footer content arrow_upwardReplaces a PDF download page with a full web statement disclosing voicemail transcription and research uses, naming the Inspector-General as Accountable Official.
read by Claude Opus 5- Discloses AI transcription of voicemail submissions, with audio retained and transcripts staff-checked
- Discloses new use of AI for background research supporting Annual Work Plan projects
- Names the Inspector-General of Aged Care as Accountable Official for AI
- Commits to annual review, or sooner if AI use changes materially
The words that changed
Scroll down to access downloads and media. ## Downloads ### Artificial intelligence transparency## Our approach to using AI The Office of the Inspector-General of Aged Care (OIGAC) follows the Australian Government’s [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). We take a cautious and proportionate approach to the use of artificial intelligence (AI). AI is used only to support low-risk, internal activities and does not replace human judgement. ## Why we use AI Where appropriate, we may use AI to support internal workplace productivity and administratement [ Download [Publication] Artificial intelligence (AI) transparency statement (PDF) as PDF - 218 KB - 2 pages ](https://www.igac.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-02/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement.pdf) [ Download [Publication] Artificial intelligence (AI) transparency statement (Word) as Word - 214 KB - 2 pagesive efficiency. AI is not used to make decisions, exercise powers, or determine outcomes. ## How we currently use AI Our current use of AI is limited and internal. We use AI to support internal administrative activities, such as transcribing voicemail submissions. Original audio recordings are retained, and transcripts are reviewed by staff for accuracy before use. We are also beginning to use AI to assist some staff with background research activities supporting the development of projects outlined in our [Annual Work Plan](https://www.igac.gov.au/what-we-do/annual-work-plans "Annual work plans"). This use is limited to identifying and summarising publicly available information and internal materials to support early research and scoping. AI does not determine project selection, priorities, or outcomes. All planning and decision‑making remains the responsibility of our staff. Our use of AI is confined to assistive, internal productivity purposes within corporate and enabling services. There is no direct public interaction with AI, and AI outputs are not relied on without human review and oversight Our AI use is classified under the DTA's AI taxonomy as workplace productivity, within the corporate and enabling services domain. ## Human oversight and safeguards All AI outputs we use are subject to human review. We do not use automated decision‑making or recommendation systems. ## Monitoring and risk management Given the limited and low‑risk nature of AI use, we monitor AI through existing executive oversight and information and communication technology (ICT) controls. This statement is reviewed and updated annually, or when our AI use changes materially. ## Compliance with policy and law Our use of AI complies with the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digacital.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-02/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement.docx) Publication type: Notice Publication date: 28 February 2025 Language: English Tags: - About us - What we do - IGAC activityai/ai-in-government-policy) and applicable Commonwealth legislation, including privacy and information security requirements. Our ICT services are provided through the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, and our AI use operates within that environment and its policies. ## Governance and accountability The Inspector‑General of Aged Care is our Accountable Official for AI. Last updated: 1 May 2026 Tags: - About us- Murray-Darling Basin Authorityfirst tracked
- Seacare Authorityfirst tracked
- Parliamentary Budget Officefirst tracked
- Net Zero Economy Authorityfirst tracked
- Jobs and Skills Australiafirst tracked
- Infrastructure Australiafirst tracked
- Healthdirect Australiafirst tracked
- Defence and Veterans' Service Commissionfirst tracked
- Australian Centre for Disease Controlfirst tracked
- Auditing and Assurance Standards Boardfirst tracked
- Australian Security Intelligence Organisationfirst tracked
- Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporationfirst tracked
- Australian Prudential Regulation Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Maritime Safety Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Federal Policefirst tracked
- Australian Accounting Standards Boardfirst tracked
Adds a "(PDF)" label to an existing link to the DTA's AI classification system; no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… patterns as outlined by the DTA’s [_Classification system for AI use._ (PDF)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Sta …Treasury says its Chief AI Officer is now appointed, stops naming the CIO as accountable official, and switches its contact to a generic AI mailbox.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer now appointed, replacing the 'will be appointed by July 2026' commitment
- Removed: identification of the Chief Information Officer as the accountable official (now just 'an accountable official')
- Contact changed from the CIO at ISBCoord@treasury.gov.au to ai@treasury.gov.au
- Update date moved from 28 February 2026 to 3 June 2026
The words that changed
… use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)wh. The polichy provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating … -statements). This page contains Treasury’s AI transparency statementand. It outlines progress against the outcomes in the [AI Plan for the Austra … rs%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## Key roles Treasury hasdesignated the Chief Information Officer (CIO) as the Aappointed an accountableOofficial forartificial intelligence (AI)use within the department. AccountableOofficials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsi … ps://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO)willhas been appointedby July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](http … Treasury’s current use of AI is classified as workplace productivity, with t. The aim over time is to leverage AI to enhance our operational efficiency. ## Public inter … ot use AI in ways that that involve direct interaction with the public, and d. Decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at Treasury has human oversight. ## Governance of AIAWe established appropriate governance arrangementshave been establishedto support AI within Treasury.TAll staff can access the Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals courseis available for all staff and. This course is mandatory under the APS AI plan.As a prerequisite to utilising Enterprise AI tools, sStaff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI before utilising Enterprise AI tools. Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations,. This includinges the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Secur … ive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, toensure themake sure AI use is responsible and effectiveuse of AI. The use of AI is governed byour: - Treasury's IT Acceptable Use Policy,- Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and- the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digi … or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on28 February3 June 2026. Forfurtherenquiries,pleasecontactthe Chief Information Officer at [ISBCoord[ai@treasury.gov.au](mailto:ISBCoordai@treasury.gov.au?subject=AI%20transparency%20statement%20enquiry). Last updated 03 June 2026The words that changed
… ation-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: ChiefRisk OfficSecurity Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/ … tional-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Instrument of Appointment Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/instrument-of-appointment-chief-artificial-intelligence-officer) - [ Plans, policies and procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-t …DFAT names a Chief AI Officer and AI Accountable Officer in place of the Chief Information Officer, and softens its pre-access AI training requirement.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer and AI Accountable Officer appointed in line with whole-of-government requirements
- Removed: Chief Information Officer as the officer responsible for AI policy compliance and data integrity
- Removed: requirement that staff complete responsible-AI training before being granted access (now just that staff using AI complete training)
- New 3 June 2026 changelog entry recording the Chief AI Officer appointment
The words that changed
… ing emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), toenhance secure business outcomes. We embrace new opportunities while recognising the uncertainties and risks that come with technological change. This public transparency statement outlines DFAT’s approach to AIsupport staff in their delivery of outcomes in the national interest. Safe and responsible use of AI is a guiding principle for AI use in … h relevant legislation, regulations, guidance, and apply best practicewhere applicable. ## Our approach to AI DFAT uses both automation andartificial intelligence (AI)to strengthen our operations and deliverbetteroutcomes. We follow the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and De … in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). At DFAT,"AI"refers to applications of machine learning, deep learning, and genera … overing every stage from initial idea to implementation. Our processes: - ensure: -AI is implemented and used safely and responsibly - continuously monitoring how AI performs - meetingall legal and regulatory obligations - identifyingrisks and potential negative impacts - support taking action to reduce or prevent harm. Each AI use case is assigne … always maintaining human oversight (‘Human-in-the-Loop’). All staff using AI must complete training on the responsible useof AI before they are granted access. Staff are encouraged to raise questions or report concerns through a dedicated internal channel.Currently, the Chief Information Officer is responsible for ensuring DFAT compliesDFAT has appointed a Chief AI Officer and an AI Accountable Officer, in accordance with whole-of-governmentAI policies and maintains the quality and integrity of departmental datarequirements. This transparency statement will be updated as our approach evolves … icy) (ver. 1.1), responsible use of AI in government 3 December 2025|-Transparency statement update\ 3 June 2026| Transparency statement updated to reflect appointment of a Chief AI OfficerOnly the page's download-widget labels around a linked PDF shifted; the agency's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ated with a 4-year strategy and governance framework in 2025 _–_ 26.pdf 572.52 KBdownload pdf [ Data strategy 2024–25 [pdf, 572.52 KB] ](https://www.acma.gov.au/s …Only the site's rotating "you may also be interested in" navigation tiles changed; the statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaLearn](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest medialearn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical refleases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questionction, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors forfeedback for us?MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.No change to the statement itself; only the rotating "related pages" navigation tiles at the foot of the museum's web page differ.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Board of Old Parliament HouseMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies anmedia) Find our latest media releases, download poublicies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Careerontact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.ontact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **28 day1 months ago**Only the rotating "related pages" tiles at the foot of the museum's page changed; the transparency statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plan4-10/moad-front-steps-and-entry.jpg.webp?h=74f1a18f&itok=uWRvqIpp) ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and rep/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about wortking at MoAD.   ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike3-03/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.Only the website's rotating "related pages" tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [AboutBoard of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house)Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingThe Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.The words that changed
… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **268 days ago**No change to the statement itself; only the site's rotating navigation tiles at the foot of the page differ between captures.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and plansAbout Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament Houseold-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Mediap](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Getting here anliament-House-Tom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of OldpParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament Houseabout/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.Pushes back the deadline for all AIC staff to complete the APS Academy's AI in Government Fundamentals course from 31 May 2025 to 30 June 2026.
read by Claude Opus 5- Staff AI training deadline moved from 31 May 2025 to 30 June 2026
The words that changed
… n Public Service Academy’s _AI in Government Fundamentals_ course by 31 May0 June 20256. ### Public interaction and impact The AIC does not propose to use …The words that changed
… ssets/git_bridge/0012/12063/mysource_files/icon-minus-white.svg) - [OAIC annual reportsAccountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reportsaccountability)  - [ Annual report 2024-25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2024-25) - [ Annual report 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202324) - [ Annual report 2022-23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2022-23) - [ Annual reportdvertising ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/advertising) - [ Gifts and benefits register ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [ Government contracts ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/government-contracts) - [ Grants and appointments ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/grants-and-appointments) - [ Indexed list of files ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/indexed-list-of-files) - [ Legal services expenditure ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/legal-services-expenditure) - [ Public interest disclosures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/public-interest-disclosures) - [ Reporting fraud and corruption at the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/reporting-fraud-and-corruption-at-the-oaic) - [ Annual Statement of Compliance with the Commonwealth Child Safe Framework 2025 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/annual-statement-of-compliance-with-the-commonwealth-child-safe-framework) - [ Corporate plans ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans)   - [ Corporate plan 20215–226 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202122) - [ Annual reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-2025-26) - [ Corporate plan 2024–25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2024-25) - [ Corporate plan 20203–214 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-202324) - [ Corporate plan 2022–23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021223) - [Annual reportCorporate plan 20219–202 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201920) - [ Annual report 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-reportcorporate-plans/corporate-plan-202122) - [ Corporate plan 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021) - [ Corporate plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201920) - [ Corporate plan 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201819) - [ Digital health annual reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/ … n-commissioners-activities-in-relation-to-digital-health-201819) - [Corporate plansMemorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plansmemorandums-of-understanding)  - [ Corporate plan 2025–26 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2025-26) - [ Corporate plan 2024–25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-2024-25) - [ Corporate plan 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202324) - [ Corporate plan 2022–23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202223) - [ Corporate plan 2021–22 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202122) - [ Corporate plan 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-202021) - [ Corporate plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201920) - [ Corporate plan 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/corporate-plans/corporate-plan-201819) - [ Plans, policies and procedureurrent memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/current-memorandums-of-understanding) - [ Memorandum of understanding reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/memorandum-of-understanding-reports) - [ Other agreements ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/other-agreements) - [ OAIC annual reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedureoaic-annual-reports)  - [Procedures for Managing Suspected Breaches of the APS Code of Conduct ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/breaches-of-the-aps-code-of-conduct-procedures) - [ Data breach response planAnnual report 2024-25 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/data-breachoaic-annual-response-plan) - [ OAIC Emissions reduction plan 2024–2026 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-emissions-reduction-planrts/annual-report-2024-20265) - [External complaints about OAIC employees or contractorsAnnual report 2023–24 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors – overarching policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors-overarching-policy) - [ Gifts and benefits policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/gifts-and-benefits-policy) - [ Human resources privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/human-resources-privacy-policy) - [ Information Publication Scheme agency plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [ Multicultural access and equity plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/multicultural-access-and-equity-plan-201920) - [ OAIC asset management policy and guidelines ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-asset-management-policy-and-guidelines) - [ OAIC service charter ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-service-charter) - [ Operational policy and process: publication of submissions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/operational-policy-and-process-publication-of-submissions) - [ Privacy complaints about the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-complaints-about-the-oaic) - [ Privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy) - [ Privacy policy summary ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy-summary) - [ Public interest disclosure procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/public-interest-disclosure-procedures) - [ Procurement judicial review policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/procurement-judicial-review-policy) - [ Privacy management plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-management-plan) - [ Communicating with the OAIC for members of the public ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public) - [ Operational information ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information)   - [ Accountable authority instructions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/accountable-authority-instructions) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-security-officerchief-risk-officer) - [ Budget ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/budget) - [ Delegation of freedom of information powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-freedom-of-information-powers-and-functions) - [ Delegation of privacy powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-privacy-powers-and-functions) - [ Employee census results ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/employee-census-results) - [ OAIC Audit Committee ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-audit-committee) - [ OAIC Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-enterprise-agreement-2024-2027) - [ OAIC Privacy Champion, Chief Privacy Officer and Privacy Officer roles ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-privacy-champion,-chief-privacy-officer-and-privacy-officer-roles) - [ Regulator expectations and intent ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability)   - [ Advertising ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/advertising) - [ Gifts and benefits register ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [ Government contracts ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/government-contracts) - [ Grants and appointments ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/grants-and-appointments) - [ Indexed list of files ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/indexed-list-of-files) - [ Legal services expenditure ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/legal-services-expenditure) - [ Public interest disclosures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/public-interest-disclosures) - [ Reporting fraud and corruption at the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/accountability/reporting-fraud-and-corruption-at-the-oaic) - [ Memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding)   - [ Current memorandums of understanding ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/current-memorandums-of-understanding) - [ Memorandum of understanding reports ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/memorandum-of-understanding-reports) - [ Other agreements ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/memorandums-of-understanding/other-agreements) - [ Annual Statement of Compliance with the Commonwealth Child Safe Framework 2025 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/annual-statement-of-compliance-with-the-commonwealth-child-safe-framework) - [ OAIC AI transparency statement ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statementoaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202324) - [ Annual report 2022-23 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-2022-23) - [ Annual report 2021–22 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202122) - [ Annual report 2020–21 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-202021) - [ Annual report 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201920) - [ Annual report 2018–19 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-annual-reports/annual-report-201819) - [ OAIC AI transparency statement ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) - [ Operational information ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information)   - [ Accountable authority instructions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/accountable-authority-instructions) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer, Chief Information and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-security-officerchief-risk-officer) - [ Budget ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/budget) - [ Delegation of freedom of information powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-freedom-of-information-powers-and-functions) - [ Delegation of privacy powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-privacy-powers-and-functions) - [ Employee census results ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/employee-census-results) - [ OAIC Audit Committee ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-audit-committee) - [ OAIC Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-enterprise-agreement-2024-2027) - [ OAIC Privacy Champion, Chief Privacy Officer and Privacy Officer roles ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-privacy-champion,-chief-privacy-officer-and-privacy-officer-roles) - [ Regulator expectations and intent ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Plans, policies and procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures)   - [ Procedures for Managing Suspected Breaches of the APS Code of Conduct ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/breaches-of-the-aps-code-of-conduct-procedures) - [ Data breach response plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/data-breach-response-plan) - [ OAIC Emissions reduction plan 2024–2026 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-emissions-reduction-plan-2024-2026) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors) - [ External complaints about OAIC employees or contractors – overarching policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/external-complaints-about-oaic-employees-or-contractors-overarching-policy) - [ Gifts and benefits policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/gifts-and-benefits-policy) - [ Human resources privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/human-resources-privacy-policy) - [ Information Publication Scheme agency plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [ Multicultural access and equity plan 2019–20 ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/multicultural-access-and-equity-plan-201920) - [ OAIC asset management policy and guidelines ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-asset-management-policy-and-guidelines) - [ OAIC service charter ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/oaic-service-charter) - [ Operational policy and process: publication of submissions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/operational-policy-and-process-publication-of-submissions) - [ Privacy complaints about the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-complaints-about-the-oaic) - [ Privacy policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy) - [ Privacy policy summary ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-policy-summary) - [ Public interest disclosure procedures ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/public-interest-disclosure-procedures) - [ Procurement judicial review policy ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/procurement-judicial-review-policy) - [ Privacy management plan ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/privacy-management-plan) - [ Communicating with the OAIC for members of the public ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/plans-policies-and-procedures/policy-on-communicating-with-the-oaic-for-members-of-the-public) - ## On this page # Our AI transparency statement \_\_ Published: …Only the website's rotating "related pages" tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans)JoFind ourteam and help us tell the story of Australian democracystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)king-banner.png.webp?h=40144d9c&itok=exOuJbMy) ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.The words that changed
… customer service charter outlines our commitment to our customers. [Our cCustomerpromiseservice charter](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/customer-service-charter) # …The words that changed
… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **226 days ago**No change to the statement's content; only page furniture like the PDF download link markup and navigation icons rendered differently.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Planning and priorities We set strategic plans and priorities to guide our work and the benefits we aim to deliver. ## On this page ## Corporate plan Our [corporate plan](https://www.acma … ated with a 4-year strategy and governance framework in 2025 _–_ 26.[ pdf 572.52 KB [ Data strategy 2024–25 [pdf, 572.52 KB] ](https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-03/Data%20strategy … oach to AI. [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 chevron_right ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)Only the rotating "explore more" navigation tiles at the foot of the page changed; the statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Conditions of entryareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [About Old Parliament House3/Senate-Chamber-Old-Parliament-House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/abousupport/vold-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988unteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here an3/Senate-Chamber-Old-Parliament-House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [About OldpParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingabout/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.The words that changed
… fect from **28 April 2026** [Read the policy](https://www.arc.gov.au/news-and-publications/publications/policy-use-generative-artificial-intelligence-arcs-grants …Adds the words "or concerns" to the contact line, a wording tweak with no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… on Officer is our AI Accountable Official for the NBA. For questions or concerns about this statement or the NBA’s use of AI, you can email [ai@blood.g …Only the site's rotating "you may also be interested in" navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by5/vh-banner.jpg.webp?h=35d1abc8&itok=2g_MnYG-) ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.   ### [VenueGetting hiere and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venuevisit/getting-hiere) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.No change by IP Australia; a stray "Corporate" label from the page's related-links tiles crept into the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-of-information) Corporate Customer service charter Our customer service charter outlines what o …The words that changed
… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **202 days ago**The capture now pulls in the whole corporate governance page around the statement; the AI transparency text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AI transparency statement The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care’s (the Commission) commitment to the safe and responsible use of AI supports our purpose to contribute to better health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers, and improved value and sustainability in the health system by leading and coordinating national improvements in the safety and quality of health care. Last updated 5 March 2026 Print Share - Twitter - Facebook - Email The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. Along with the [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). ## Why we use AI To achieve our purpose to contribuShare Facebook X Email Print ### Go to section # Corporate governance Our corporate governance reflects the legislative requirements we have to handle data, privacy, freedom of information and other policies and procedures. ## Governance In 2011, the Federal Parliament passed the [National Health Reform Act 2011](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/nhra2011216/) (NHR Act) which established the Commission as a corporate Commonwealth entity under the [Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2013A00123) (PGPA Act). The Commission’s governance structure is determined by these Acts. The Commission is jointly funded by all governments on a cost sharing basis, and the Commission’s program of work is developed in consultation with the Australian, state and territory Health Ministers. The Commission works in partnership with patients, healthcare professionals, policy makers and healthcare organisations to achieve a sustainable, safe and high-quality health system. The Commission’s strategic priorities are in the areas of: - High-quality care in an evolving environment - Strong outcome-focused clinical governance - Empowered patients, carers and communities - An improvement-driven workforce culture The Commission’s planned activities are shaped by these four strategic priorities and align with the functions of the Commission set out in the NHR Act. The [Commission Board](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/our-board "Our Board"), appointed by the Minister for Health and Ageing, Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, is responsible for governing the Commission and meeting its functions and responsibilities under legislation. In undertaking its work, the Commission is supported by the Inter-Jurisdictional Committee, which is made up of senior safety and quality managers from the Australian Government Department of Health, Disability, and Ageing, and each state and territory. In addition, the Board has established sub-committees in the form of the Private Hospital Sector Committee and Primary Care Committee that provide a valuable connection with representatives from the private and public sectors. Program initiatives are informed by external advisory committees, working groups, public consultation and workshops. Major Commission proposals are forwarded to the Health Chief Executives Forum and the Health Ministers' Meeting. The Commission is situated in Sydney and is managed on a day-to-day basis by its [CEO, Conjoint Professor Anne Duggan](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are "Who we are"). ## Data governance The Commission has established a [Data Governance Framework](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-data-governance-framework "ACSQHC Data Governance Framework") and [Data Plan](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-data-plan-2025-28 "ACSQHC Data Plan 2025-28") to govern the use of data. The Commission’s Data Governance Framework specifies the obligations of the Commission with regard to data acquisition, maintenance, sharing/permissions, reporting and publication. The Data Governance Framework was developed in accordance with legislative requirements and formal agreements. ## Disclosure of Interests Policy The Commission has developed a [Disclosure of Interests Policy](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/acsqhc-disclosure-interests-policy "ACSQHC Disclosure of Interests Policy"). This policy assists in ensuring that the Commission complies with statutory obligations relating to disclosure of interests under the Commonwealth legislation by appropriately disclosing any material personal interests in a prescribed way. The Disclosure of Interests Policy applies to all employees, contractors and consultants who have duties related to the operations and functions of the Commission. The policy aims to: protect the integrity of the Commission; promote confidence in the work of the Commission; and to protect the reputation of the individuals and groups that contribute to the work of the Commission. The policy also provides a mechanism for individuals to disclose any and all interests that may conflict with the work of the Commission. If you have any questions regarding the Disclosure of Interests Policy, please contact us on 02 9126 3600 or [through email](mailto:mail@safetyandquality.gov.au). ## Freedom of Information (FOI) The purpose of the [Freedom of Information Act 1982](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/C2004A02562%5Ct_self) (FOI Act) is to give members of the public rights of access to information held by the Government of the Commonwealth and of its agencies. [View how to make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance/making-freedom-information-foi-request "Making a Freedom of Information (FOI) request") ## Privacy Impact Assessment Register Under section 15(1) of the [Privacy (Australian Government Agencies – Governance) APP Code 2017](https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2017L01396/asmade/text) (Privacy Code), the Commission is required to “maintain a register of the Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) it conducts. An agency must publish the register, or a version of the register, on its website”. Expand all 1 – Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Project Reference number| **1**\ ---|---\ Project name| **Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Project**\ Project description| The PaRIS survey is an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) initiative to promote people-centred health care, and its aim is to strengthen the measurement of patient-reported outcomes and experiences.The survey is focused on patients aged over 45 with one or more chronic condition in primary and ambulatory care. It includes both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and patient reported experience measures (PREMS). Examples of PROMS are ratings of peoples’ pain, physical functioning, and psychological well-being. Examples of PREMS are peoples’ experiences with healthcare, such as experienced waiting times and communication with healthcare providers. On top of the PROMS and PREMS, some background characteristics such as age, sex and the type of conditions will be collected to be used in data analysis.As well as a patient questionnaire, there will be a provider questionnaire to collect some practice and provider characteristics.The PaRIS Survey is being conducted by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission), on behalf of the on Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. The Commission has engaged ORIMA Research to assist with implementation of the survey Australia-wide.The PaRIS project has also been reviewed and approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC reference number - 0012023).The Privacy Impact Assessment for the project considers how personal information is collected, managed, and protected; an assessment of compliance with the Australian Privacy Principles; and recommendations to mitigate any privacy impacts.\ Project commencement date| April 2023\ Expected completion date| January 2024 2 – MedicineInsight Reference number| **2**\ ---|---\ Project name| MedicineInsight\ Project description| MedicineInsight is a national primary care data collection based on data extracted from the Clinical Information Software at participating General Practices. Data are deidentified and encrypted as part of the extraction process, and stored in a secure Australian based data warehouse.The data are subsequently used in three main ways: - Fed back to Practices and GPs enabling them to reflect on their prescribing patterns and patient care and review their practice results as well as the aggregate of all participating MedicineInsight practices as an ongoing Quality Improvement initiative - Used as an evidence base to inform policy and regulatory decisions by government departments, agencies, and subsidiaries (e.g. TGA, PBAC) - Made available to Australian based researchers as bespoke Data Extracts or aggregate data tables upon formal application for primary care research projects The collection of data from General Practices and the use of that data for research purposes have been reviewed and approved by the RACGP NREEC (Ref NREEC 23-171).A Privacy Impact Assessment for the program was undertaken in 2021 under the prior data custodian NPS MedicineWise. The program was transferred to the Commission in January 2023, and supplementary PIA advice was sought in 2025. These assessments examined how the collection manages and protects data in line with Australian legislation including the Privacy Act and Australian Privacy Principles, and provided recommendations to strengthen the integrity of the program. These recommendations have been or are being actioned as appropriate.\ Project commencement date| January 2023\ Expected completion date| Ongoing ## Privacy Policy The Commission is committed to the protection of personal information in accordance with the [Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text). The Commission aims to ensure that all personal information is managed in accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) contained in the Privacy Act. The Commission is also committed to ensuring that the statistical healthcare datasets accessed pursuant to our functions under the [National Health Reform Act 2011](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2011A00009/latest/text) and the National Health Reform Agreement is managed in a manner which is generally consistent with the APPs, as well as state and territory privacy laws and healthcare regulations. [View our privacy policy](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/privacy-policy "Privacy Policy") The most up to date versions of both the Privacy Act and [National Health Reform Act 2011](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2011A00009/latest/text) are available from [Comlaw](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/). The National Health Reform Agreement is available from [COAG](http://www.coag.gov.au/node/96). The Commission is also a signatory to the [National Health Information Agreement](https://meteor.aihw.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/182135). ### Information collected on this website When you visit our website, our server makes a record of your visit and logs the following non-identifiable information for statistical, quality improvement or systems administration purposes: - your server address - your top level domain name (for example .com, .gov, .au, .uk etc) - the date and time of your visit to the site - the pages you accessed and documents downloaded - the previous site you have visited - the type of browser you are using. No attempt will be made to identify individual users unless required under Australian law or a tribunal/court order. We collect no personal information about you unless you choose to take part in an activity that asks for personal information, such as subscribing to a newsletter, sending an email or participating in a survey. If you choose not to take part in these kinds of activities your ability to use the website won’t be affected. ### Hotjar and Google Analytics This website uses two web analytics services: Hotjar and Google Analytics. Hotjar may record mouse clicks, mouse movements and scrolling activity. Hotjar collects non-identifiable information regarding pages visited, actions which are taken, country of origin, device used, operating system, and browser used. Hotjar does not collect personally identifiable information that you do not voluntarily enter in this website. Hotjar does not track your browsing habits across web sites which do not use Hotjar services. Google Analytics uses cookies and JavaScript code to enable analysis on usage of this website. The data collected about your use of this website, (including your IP address) will be transmitted to and stored on Google's servers. Google will use this data for the purpose of compiling reports on website activity for us and providing other services relating to website activity and internet usage. Google will not collect personal information about you and the reports provided by Google to us will only contain aggregate non personal data about your use of this website (these reports may contain data relating to pages viewed, files downloaded or the completion of online subscriptions). Google may transfer this data to third parties where required to do so by law, or where third parties process this data on Google's behalf. Google will not associate your IP address with any personal information you may have previously provided to Google. You may refuse the use of cookies by selecting the appropriate settings on your browser. Please note that if you do this, you may not be able to fully use this website. By using this website, you consent to the processing of data about you by Hotjar and Google in the manner and for the purposes set out above. ## Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures The Commission has established its policy and procedures for dealing with Public Interest Disclosures. Disclosures can be directed tobetter health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers,an Authorised Officer, appointed under the [Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (PID Act)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00133/latest/text). The Commission's Chief Executive Officer has appointed the following staff members as the Commission's Authorised Officers: - [Chris Leahy, Chief Operating Officer](mailto:christopher.leahy@safetyandquality.gov.au) The PID Act prescribes a framework for the disclosure and investigation of wrongdoing and maladministration in the Australian Public Sector (APS). The Commission encourages and supports the reporting of wrongdoings in the APS so that they can be investigated and addressed. [View our Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/public-interest-disclosure-policy-and-procedures "Public Interest Disclosure Policy and Procedures") ## AI transparency statement The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care’s (the Commission) commitsment to the safe and responsibleadoption of AI to take advantage of the various benefits the technology provides. ##use of AI supports our purpose to contribute to better health outcomes and experiences for all patients and consumers, and improved value and sustainability in the health system by leading and coordinating national improvements in the safety and quality of health care. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [ _Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. Along with the [ _Standard for AI transparency statements_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [_Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). Expand all How we use AI The Commission uses Microsoft Copilot in a protected environment, for [ _generative_](https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/generative-ai.html) and narrow model AI in line with the DTA’s [ _Classification systems for use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) a … in include scientific, corporate and enabling and service delivery.##Our approach with AI A human will assess all AI outputs to ensure acc … . This transparency statement will be revised this approach changes.##Our commitment The Commission is committed to using AI in a responsib … - legislation - regulations - frameworks - policies - best practice.##Safe and responsible AI adoption We will be transparent as we adopt r … nues to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology.##Contact The Chief Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official … T@safetyandquality.gov.au](mailto:ACSQHCICT@safetyandquality.gov.au)Find more in our resource library [Governance](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library?f%5B0%5D=topics:42## Topics - [ About the Commission ](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/search?filter%5B0%5D=topics%3A94) [Was this information useful? ](https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/webform/ajax/feedback?target_id=feedback-form-replace&page_path=/about-us/corporate-governance)Rewrites the statement: adds Copilot Chat rollout, mandatory staff training, an AI oversight committee and a policy v2.0 compliance table, and drops the contact email.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds Copilot Chat alongside Microsoft 365 Copilot, now being rolled out rather than trialled
- Softens the prohibition: from 'we do not authorise' public-facing AI without a human intermediary to 'has not yet deployed' such systems
- Adds mandatory staff generative-AI training and a forthcoming staff AI use policy
- Announces an AI oversight committee being established, plus a lifecycle governance list
The words that changed
… ible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) **On this page**Transparency is critical to building public trust and is an important aim of the policy## Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Transparency is critical to building public trust and supports the Australian Government’s commitment to safe, responsible and ethe broader APS Reform agenda. Wical adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. At Sport Integrity Australia (SIA), we define AI as a family of technologies that canbring togethercombine: - computing power, - scalability, - networking, - connected devicesand, - interfaces,and; - data.AI systems can be programmed to perform specific tasks such asto perform tasks that would normally require human intelligence. These tasks may include: - reasoning, - planning, - prediction, - natural language processing, - summarisation, - transcription, - computer vision,audio processing, interaction, prediction and more.nd; - decision support. SIA defers to the Digital Transformation Agency’s definition of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems can operate with varying levels of autonomy. We aas;\ ‘ _A machine-based system that for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, reitted to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful use when considering the adoption of AI capabilities. We will be transparent as we prepare, engage, adopt, monitor, review, evolve, integrate and pivot to changes in AI technology, to benefit staff and external stakeholders. ## How we use AI At this time we do not authorise the use of AI in any way thatendations, or decisions, that can influence physical or virtual environments_ ’. AI systems may operate with varying levels of autonomy. We are committed to ensuring that all AI capabilities are implemented in a manner that is lawful, ethical, secure, transparent and human-centred. ## How we use AI At this time, SIA has not yet deployed AI systems in ways where members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI without ahuman intermediary or intervention. We are testing the generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. The usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. ### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI toppropriate human oversight, review or intervention. We are currently rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat in controlled internal workplace productivity environments, consistent with Australian Government policy and security requirements. Our use of AI is aimed at improveing workplace productivity forallstaffincluding: - helping answ. As a prerestions from staff regarding workplace policies and entitlements - improving accessibiisite to using Copilot, SIA staff will be required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. We also are developing a politcyto help all staff use platforms, applications and services - improving the uptake of features in existing products and services - summarising documents, emails and other content - perfon the use of AI tools by staff, which staff will be required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing generative AI tools online. This internal training and internal policy will assist staff to: - not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without external verification - restrict the distribution of sensitive material to third parties, for example by copy-and-pasting sensitive content. We are explormingta ranscription of interviews and meeting notes - preparing training mage of AI driven innovations and tools, to make sure we continuously improve our efficiency and effectiveness as a sport integrity agency. AI tools are currently limited to interinalfor new and existing staff - In the future we are considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation “By 2030, the Australian Government will use data and digital technologies in innovative ways.” - See the [Adopting emerging technologies section](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-future#adopt-emerging-technologies) in the Data and Digital Government Strategy. #### We have processes to ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident,corporate and enabling functions and are not authorised to independently make decisions, provide official determinations, or replace human judgement in operational or public-facing services. ## Responsible AI safety and governance We are committed to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful uses of AI and ensuring appropriate governance throughout the lifecycle of AI adoption, including: - evaluation and procurement - implementation and testing - operational monitoring - risk management - security assurance - ongoing review and improvement. We are establishing an AI oversight committee that are responsible for the processes we have in place that ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - risks are identified, assessed and managed - AI systems remain subject to human oversight and accountability - stafe and responsible - ourf use AI safely, responsibly and in accordance with agency policy - AI usage is monitored and audited where appropriate - stakeholders canhavemaintain trust in our use of AI- our risks are identified and addressed - our AI access and usage is monitoredtechnologies. ## Public-facing AI use Currently,weSIA does not use AIin any services or advice we provide externally (publicly) or internally. If we do implement any AI capability, we will update this statement to outline our use, with a summary of: - the intentions behind why we uses AI or is considering its adoption - classification of AI use according to required outcomes and AI system or tool -systems to independently provide public services, make regulatory decisions, or deliver advice without human review and accountability mechanisms. If public-facing or higher-risk AI capabilities are introduced in future, this statement will be updated to provide transparency regarding: - the purpose and intended outcomes of the AI capability - the classification and risk profile of the AI use classification of use where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI without a human intermediary or intervention -e - whether members of the public interact directly with AI systems - governance and assurance measuresto- monitorthe effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes - compliance with applicable legislation and regulation - efforts to identify and protect the public against negative impacts - compliance with each requirement uing and evaluation arrangements - safeguards to minimise harm and unintended impacts - compliance with legislation, policy and Australian Government AI requirements. While AI may be used to help in various tasks, our people will continue to be responsible for oversight and decision making. ## Compliance with AI in Government Policy Under thethe rResponsibleuUse of AI ingGovernment. ## Compliance - We will only utilise AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. #### Policy for the responsible use of AI in government - We comply with all mandatory requirements of the policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai-use-case-impact-assessment) (AI in government Policy) and the; - [Standards for AI transparency statements [PDF 282 KB]](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) We are required to report our compliance with the requirements under the policy. At time of publishing, this section is compliant with version 2.0 of the AI in government policy. The following table outlines the requirements of version 2.0 of the AI in government policy and the status of compliance with those requirements: #### Requirement | #### Status ---|---\ Accountable Official | Compliant\ AI Transparency Statement | Compliant ## Accountable official-The Deputy CEO was designated as the accountable officialon 20 August 2024for AI governance on 20 August 2024 in accordance with Australian Government policy requirements. #### AI transparency statement ThisAI transparencystatement wasfirstpublishedto our website in January 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. ## Contact us If you have any enquiries about this statement, we can be reached via email: [contactus@sportintegrity.gov.au](mailto:contactus@sportintegrity.gov.au)in May 2026. It will be reviewed and updated: - at least once a year - when a significant change is made to the agency’s approach to AI (including the complete roll out of CoPilot as described above) - when SIA becomes aware of any new factor that materially impacts the statement’s accuracy. #### Related information - [Governance](https://www.sportintegrity. …Only the date line "28 February 2026" at the top of the statement has dropped out; the text is otherwise unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
28 February 2026The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is dedicated …Only the website's rotating navigation tiles beneath the statement changed; the transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reportingCollection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.5/vh-banner.jpg.webp?h=35d1abc8&itok=2g_MnYG-) ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?Only surrounding page furniture changed: CMS link revision hashes updated and the "customer promise" tile renamed to "customer service charter"; nothing about AI use altered.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… /media/Project/IPA/IPAustralia/PDF/Gender-Action-Plan-2025-27.pdf?rev=44ee236c30ac486a9930a1ceed0c3a54&hash=358791AC5B0A59EDC508217E1FA6106Bbef1d7df1a634d1fb44bc7bdd52ba80d&hash=019DDBD70901C5C486D75AC8E115913F). Download [ WGEA Employer Statement PDF | 267KB ](https://www.ipau … mers. [Our customer promise](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/our-customer-promiseservice-charter) ##### Cost recovery implementation statement Our cost recovery imp … Australia/PDF/ip-australia-rpf-self-assessment-report-2019-20.pdf?rev=9c89958593164a149866196ea4946b44a80fb5849a684b02b383833cef0deb2c) ##### Tenders and contracts #### Senate Order for entity contracts … ning_breaches_of_code_of_conduct_and_for_determining_sanction.pdf?rev=bf4973a69c014c4b8a80dccb326ad89c42e18675965e4d69be7eb4f2ba70e319) ## Related content Freedom of information You can request copies … gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-of-information)Our cCustomerpromise As part of our commitment to creating a world-leading IP system, customers are the core of everything we do. Our customer promise outlines this commitmentservice charter Our customer service charter outlines what our customers can expect when interacting with us and how we aim to provide high levels of service. [Read more](https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/our-customer-promiseservice-charter) Gift register Our agency heads and staff occasionally accept gifts …Only the rotating "related pages" tiles at the foot of the museum's website changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans)JoFind ourteam and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed bystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **1920 days ago**Only the museum website's rotating "about" navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Board of Old Parliament HouseCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?   ### [AboutTom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house)Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizensThe Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.The words that changed
… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **149 days ago**Only the museum's rotating navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofBoard of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.No change to the statement itself; only the museum website's rotating promotional tiles below the text differ between captures.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Venue hireMap](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interv3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiewsand film shoots.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.3-03/MoAD-Changemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ![About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/sites/default/f …Only the rotating "related pages" tiles at the foot of the museum's website changed; the AI transparency statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [PartnershipsVenue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [CareersMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careersmedia)JoFind ourteam and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.Geoscience Australia rewrites its statement for policy v2.0: one Accountable Official instead of two, a Chief AI Officer due by July 2026, and Copilot named.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer to be appointed by July 2026 under the APS AI Plan 2025
- Accountable Officials cut from two (CIO and Chief Scientist) to the CIO alone
- Removed: claim that no AI use cases touch published products and services
- Microsoft 365 Copilot named as the endorsed enterprise AI tool for staff
The words that changed
… use of AI as we explore opportunities and implement AI capabilities.ThisOur commitment aligns with the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [policy for the responsible use of AI in government 2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and we are working towards meeting the obligations of the policy and the outcomes of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## How we use AI Geoscience Australia has long been engaged in the … abilities, within our work practices and scientific disciplines, focussinged on internal testing and explorationwith no use cases being used on published products and services. **Use patterns and domains** Geoscience Australia is investigating and employing AI systems for Scientific. We are using AI, based on the [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) in government, for: - Usage patterns of analytics for insights,Cworporate and Enabling domains, and as a subset within each, the Skplace productivity, decision making and administrative action, and image processing. - Domains of serviceDdeliverydomain. _Scientific Research and Information_\ _Usage Patterns: Analytics for insights, Image processing, corporate and enabling, and scientific endeavours. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains: _Scientific_ The investigation and application of AI involve multiple scientific … e and improve access to Geoscience Australia’s scientific resources.Examples of oOur utilisation of AI includes tailored Machine Learning productsmadeavailable to both internal and external stakeholders. Additionally, current investigations in support of Critical Minerals initiatives, current investigationsare focused on building covariate libraries, large dataset analyses, … ng capabilities at the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI). _Work Process Improvement AI_\ _Usage Patterns: Decision making and administrative action, Workplace productivity_ We are enhancing workplace efficiency with the use of Generative AI (such as Microsoft CoPilot)Corporate and enabling_ Geoscience Australia endorsed AI products for staff use are Microsoft 365 Copilot, available as an Enterprise AI tool. Workplace productivity is being improved by automating administration tasks, improved services and accessingto informationquickly through improved user experience, letting staff focus on core tasks. ## Compliance We will, letting staff focus on core tasks. ## AI governance We meet the current [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) due to date and developing appropriate governance arrangements aligned to our agency strategic direction and operations. Our aim is to utilise AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. ###Accountable officialKey roles In alignment withDTA’sthe [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy),we have two accountable officials under the policy. These are the Chief Informationthe Chief Information Officer ([CIO](https://www.ga.gov.au/about/organisational-structure)) is our designated Accountable Official. A Chief AI Officer (CAIO)and the Chief Scientist represented by those within each [rolewill be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.gadigital.gov.au/about/organisational-structure)policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead our AI transformation. ### Authoritative source, individual responsibility and monitoring … o maintain the integrity and reliability of all systems, including AI. Staff are also required to complete mandatory training prior to using Enterprise AI tools. Generative AI can be useful for research, summarising information, o … ia is monitored through an AI register and assessed (when applicable)through multiple processes with a focus on business cases, security and efficiency. ### Reviews and more information The transparency statement will be reviewed at least every twelve months, or as our approach to AI changes. Statement update| Comment\ ---|---\ 20 February 2025 | Transparency statement released For more information or enquires about Geoscience Australia’s adoption of AI, you can [contact us](https://www.ga.gov.au/contact-us)for use case suitability, risks and security. Assessments consider the relevant governance, standards, procedures or guidance, either in part or full and where applicable, such as the [Artificial intelligence impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/a), [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-technical-standard), and [Guidance for AI proof of concept to scale](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-POC-to-scale). ### Reviews and more information The transparency statement will be reviewed at least every twelve months, or as our approach to AI changes. The most recent update was on 15th May 2026.Only the website's rotating promotional tiles at the foot of the page changed; the statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CPareertnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/abousupport/cparetners) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracyhips) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [PCartnershipeers](https://moadoph.gov.au/supporabout/pcartneerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old-Parliament-House-curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.The words that changed
… ptions, visit the [Go Global Toolkit](https://export.business.gov.au/find-export-markets/middle-east-updates-and-supportreight-and-shipping/trade-resilience-service) for the latest updates and support available. ## How Austrade defin …Only the website's rotating "related pages" tiles changed; the statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/mediacareers)FJoindourlatest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament HouseChangemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Do you have questions or feedback for us?### [Lear Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.   ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the loca0/moad-front-steps-and-entry.jpg.webp?h=74f1a18f&itok=uWRvqIpp) ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditionsexhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House6/Statement-Jack-Green%27s-paintings-exhibition-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.The words that changed
… ontact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **124 days ago**Adds an AI classification section disclosing workplace-productivity use in the corporate and enabling domain, with no direct public interaction without human review.
read by Claude Opus 5- New 'AI classification' section aligned to the DTA Standard
- Discloses usage pattern: workplace productivity (document summarisation, content creation)
- Discloses domain: corporate and enabling (HR, finance, communications, IT)
- States the public does not directly interact with or is significantly impacted by its AI without human review
The words that changed
… telligence (AI) by the OSI is in line with the AI policies of AGD andAFPthe AFP. ## **AI classification** In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency Standard for AI transparency statements, we classify our current and intended use of AI as follows: - Usage patterns: our primary focus is on workplace productivity to facilitate communication such as document summarisation and content creation. - Domains: our AI application is situated within the corporate and enabling domain, supporting internal functions like HR, finance, communication and IT. At this stage of adoption, the public does not directly interact with, nor is it significantly impacted by our AI systems or their outputs without human review. ## **Data privacy and security** Protecting the privacy and securi …Only the website's rotating "related pages" navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [VolunteerMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofabout/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)tatement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry appr … of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.Complete rewrite: the ATSB now discloses active AI use across productivity, search, analytics and training, adds safeguards, mandatory staff training and an AI contact address.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure of active AI use: document summarising and drafting, inbox management, interview transcription, meeting notes, internal chatbots and search, data analytics and coding, training materials and research
- Removed: statement that ATSB does not use AI to deliver any of its services, and reference to the Microsoft 365 Copilot trial
- Adds explicit exclusions: no AI in investigative decisions/findings, HR and recruitment, or public-facing service delivery
- Adds contact point ai@atsb.gov.au
The words that changed
The Digital### Principles - The Australian Transfpormation Agency's [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI in the Australian Public Service. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) adheres to this policy supporting its principles unt Safety Bureau (ATSB) is committed to the safe, responsible, and ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Our AI systems will be developed and deployed with fairness, accountability, privacy, security, reliability, and transparency in mind. - We will use our AI systems to enhance, not replace, human decision-making. Human-in-the-loop will ensure all critical decisions are reviewed and approved by qualified public officials to ensure accuracy and accountability. - We are transparent about our AI use and its impact. We will regularly update this statement on our AI initiatives and their outcomes. ### Transparency statement This transparency statement is reviewed at least annually, or whenever there is a significant change to the ATSB’s approach to AI. ### Why we use AI ATSB recognises the value in using modern the "enable, engage, and evolve" framework. We will be transparent in our internal use of AI technology as we explore, evaluate and adopt AI technology to benefit our work and our stakeholdechnology, including AI, to improve our workplace efficiency and effectiveness and assist with quality control and accuracy. We see AI as an opportunity to reduce administrative burden on our staff, allowing them to focus on areas of their work that best use their experience, expertise, and judgement. ### How we use AI The ATSB’s current AI focus is on improving workplace productivity and information discoversy.Currently, ATSB does not plan to use AI in services that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by. If this changes, we will update this statement to detail our use of AI. ## **AI use** Presently, t- **Productivity:** Assisting with administrative tasks, summarising and drafting documents, drafting emails and managing inboxes, transcribing interviews, note taking in meetings. - **Information discovery:** Search tools and chat bots to assist with finding and retrieving information across various internal repositories, as an alternative to traditional search. - **Data analytics and coding:** Analysis of datasets, development of scripts and code for data analytics and software systems. - **Training materials and research:** Developing internal training materials and explanatory guides, assisting with policy development and research. ### What we do not use AI for - **Investigative decision-making:** The ATSB does not utilise AI todeliver any of its services. Although, the ATSB did participate in the Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilotmake decisions or findings in the course of transport safety investigations. All investigative conclusions remain the result of human analysis. - **Employee relations:** AI is not used for HR recruitment, hiring decisions, performance management, or other areas with direct human impact. - **Public interaction:** We do not use AI for any direct service delivery or as a primary point of contact for external stakeholders. ###**Monitoring andgoverning AI use** The ATSB is developing an overarching agency approach to AI and will establish an AI Steering Committee to assess the opportunsafeguards All AI outputs are subject to human review. The ATSB adheres to the principle that AI assists, but does not replace, human judgment. Before any AI-generated content is used in an official capacity, it must be verified by a staff member for accuracy, fairness, and compliance with our standards. All decisions, outcomes, and work products are reviewed, owned and managed by a human. We operate AI within secure, controlled environments to ensure that sensitivesandrisks in using AI within the agency. ##personal information is protected in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 and other relevant legislation and frameworks. ### Governance and accountability The ATSB has established governance frameworks to oversee the adoption of AI: - **Accountable official:**and is supported by Chief Information Officer to assist in guiding implementation of AI governance and monitoring current and emerging systems to ensure AI is used in a safe, ethical and effective way. ## **AI transparency statement** This AI transparency statement was first published in March 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when any significant change is made to our approach to AI. - **Internal oversight:** We utilise internal governance processes to assess the opportunities and risks associated with new AI use cases before deployment. - **Training:** All staff undertake mandatory AI fundamentals training, and staff using key AI tools are provided with additional training and guidance on the responsible and ethical use of these technologies, including awareness of bias and data security. ### Contact us For questions or further information about our AI usage contact [**ai@atsb.gov.au**](mailto:ai@atsb.gov.au).Only the rotating "you may also like" navigation tiles at the foot of the page changed; the AI statement text is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [MediaVolunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request intervsupport/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiewsand film shoots.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this pagea1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access tofind the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australi2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike6/careers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.Only the "Published 27 March 2025" date stamp line dropped out of the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Published 27 March 2025Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) recognises the potential …The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **812 days ago**Only the museum's rotating "you may also like" promo tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Conditions of entryMedia](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Map](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/map) Use this page to find the locations of exhibitions, heritage spaces, the cafe and visitor facilities.  ### [ContactOld-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.Only the museum website's rotating "you may also like" navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Careersonditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)onditions-of-entry)  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike. ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry appr … cal reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Do you have questions or feedback for us?  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?5/senate-chamber-tom-ferguson-collection-heritage.jpg.webp?h=b7d2572b&itok=2GWN_mMI) ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.Only the rotating navigation tiles at the foot of the museum's page changed; the AI transparency statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Contact uareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry) ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Ho1/Statement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?Names Brendan Moon as Chief AI Officer, sets out his duties, and cuts back from two AI Accountable Officers to one.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer named: Brendan Moon, First Assistant Secretary, Child Care Integrity Division, replacing a promise to fill the role by June 2026
- Removed: Matthew Johnston as a second AI Accountable Officer; Kerryn Kovacevic is now the sole officer
- New list of Chief AI Officer responsibilities, including reporting to the Executive Board
- Link added to the DTA's AI in government policy page
The words that changed
… our capabilities. Our use of AI is informed by and aligned with the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service and the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The department is developing its own AI Strategy and Roadmap for th … ent of Education’s use of AI is overseen by our AI Accountable Officersand a Chief AI Officer. The AI Accountable Officers: -areis the primary contactsfor whole‑of‑government AI assurance and coordination, and keeping staff informed of AI policy obligations and changes., -areis accountable for implementing AI policy within the agency, including governance frameworks, transparency statements and internal registers, - oversees AI risk assessments and ensures appropriate controls are in place,. The department’s AI Accountable Officers are: -is Kerryn Kovacevic, Chief Information Officer- Matthew Johnston, First Assistant Secretary, Strategy, Data and Measurement T. The department’s Chief AI Officer is responsible for: - leading and championing a department-wide approach to AI adoption, driving change and uplifting AI literacy in the department, - identifying, prioritising and sponsoring high-value AI use cases, - reporting to the department’sChief AI Officer is responsible for driving value, adoption and cultural change through AI.Executive Board, working with the AI Accountable Officer to ensure AI adoption occurs within agreed risk boundaries and in alignment with whole-of-government policy and community expectations. The department’s Chief AI Officerwill be in place by June 2026is Brendan Moon, First Assistant Secretary, Child Care Integrity Division. ## Governance and transparency The department is maturing its AI g … o minimise risk and safeguard the public, the Department of Education**does not**use AI for automated decision-making. All decisions**are made by staff**, ensuring human oversight and accountability. ## Review and Updates …The words that changed
… which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoptionnode/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. Thi …Only the website's rotating promo tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [VolunteerContact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadorabout/contact) Do you have questionsforMoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoADfeedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [CVollection and heritageunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting3/MoAD-Changemakers-exhibition-launch-Quentin-Bryce-pewpewstudio_0.jpg.webp?h=f9353e1e&itok=zBXy77RF) ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **68 days ago**No change of substance: page chrome such as "Back to top", quick links and a new-tab link label differ between captures.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Back to topThe Digital Transformation Agency's [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Pol … nnually, or when any significant change is made to our approach to AI.Quick Links [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)NHMRC rewrites its statement, disclosing new GenAI uses including SharePoint HR/IT agents, code generation and analytics, and swaps the assurance framework for the impact assessment tool.
read by Claude Opus 5- New uses disclosed: SharePoint agents for internal HR and IT advice, code generation/debugging, and analytics classifying research topics
- Staff now allowed to use certain public GenAI tools under DTA guidance
- Licensed M365 Copilot with enterprise data protection replaces generic 'Microsoft Copilot', following the Copilot pilot and evaluation
- Removed: reliance on the DTA pilot AI assurance framework, replaced by the AI impact assessment tool
The words that changed
278 February 20256 The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is dedicated to the adoption and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. This Transparency Statement outlines our approach to AI use within the NHMRC, in accordance with the DTA's [pigital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for responsible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policyai/ai-in-government-policy/staff-training). ## Purpose of AIUuse The NHMRC encourages the use ofAI to achieveGenerative AI (GenAI) to enhance our productivity, where it is ethical and safe to do so. Our AI initiatives include aut … r work to support the overall mission of building a healthy Australia.AapplicationsCurrently, the NHMRC primarily uses Microsoft’s Copilot as its AI tool. Copilot allows staff to apply AI for the purposes of: - **Automation and Efficiency** - AI aFollowing a [pilot](https://www.digital.gov.au/initiatives/copilot-trial) and [evaluation](https://evaluation.treasury.gov.au/publications/evaluation-generative-artificial-intelligence) of Microsoft 365 (M365) Copilot, NHMRC staff have access to the licenced version providing enterprise data protection. M365 Copilot allows staff to use GenAI, as per the \[DTA classification system\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Standard for AI transparency statements 2.0_0.pdf), for the purposes of: ### Workplace productivity - Automatesing repetitive tasks (for example, meeting transcriptions, minutes, searching for emails or sorting data), allowing staff to focus on more complex and value-added activities. -**Office Productivity** - AI is employed toStructuring content in documents such as internal reports. - Generating and debugging code used in systems and applications development and maintenhancetextual interpretation and generation by understanding and. ### Corporate and enabling - GenAI is used to support internal HR and IT advice using simple SharePoint agents. ### Analytics for insights - Used to support a range of respondrtingin natural language, such as structuring text in documents or summarisand analytics activities such as internally classifying research topics. _Note: We also allow staff to access certain public GenAI tools in linge written material.h the DTA's guide on APS use of public generative AI tools._ ## Monitoring andGgovernance The NHMRC has established governance mechanisms to ensure the ethical and effective use of AI. This includes: - **Training:** – All staff musing Copilot complete [AI fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-fundamentals) training to ensure that there is always human involvement for any processes where AI is applied. - **Community of Practice**:– An inclusive group that meets regularly to discuss AI-related risks and opportunities. - **GovernanceFforums:** – We use our range of existing forums integrating AI issues such as security and privacy. ## PublicIimpact andCcompliance We are committed to protecting the public from potential ne … lic may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by AI. Wewilluse the DTA’s [AIassurance frameworkimpact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-frameworkai/impact-assessment-tool) to review the impact of AI against[Australia'’s AIeEthicspPrinciples](https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/Australia's%20AI%20ethics%20principles).. The NHMRC willalsoadhere to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as. NHMRC is implementing the DTA'’s [pPolicy for responsible AI in government v2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policyai/ai-in-government-policy) and following its guidance on [use of public generative AI tools](https://www.dta.gov.au/media-releases/dta-releases-new-guidance-australian-government-use-public-generative-ai-tools). ## Transparency andUupdates This Transparency Statement is part of our commitment to open … to reflect any changes in our AI practices and policies. ### UpdateHhistory - 6 May 2026: Updated version published. - 26 February 2025: Initial version published. ## ContactIinformation For more information about our AI initiatives or to provid …Rewrites the statement to name Claude and Copilot as authorised tools, add out-of-scope data, legislative compliance and an annual review by the Accountable Official.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names Anthropic's Claude and Microsoft Copilot for internal summarising and meeting minutes
- New out-of-scope carve-out: duplicate-payment public hospital data excluded from AI until tools approved for sensitive information
- Commits the AI Accountable Official to review the statement at least annually
- Adds compliance list (Archives, FOI, Privacy Acts, NHFB Privacy Policy) and NHR Act data governance review
The words that changed
… 0for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)along with the, [Standard for AI transparency statements(Opens in a new tab/window)]( … 24-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) andthe [Interim[Staff guidance ongovernment use ofpublic generative AItools(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://architecturewww.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai),shapesthe Australian Government’s approach to adopting the benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) while supporting its safe, ethical and responsible useof AI. This transparency statement developed below helps align with DTA’s requirements. The National Health Funding Body (NHFB) and our Shared Services provider (the Department of Healthand Aged Care) is, Disability and Ageing) are committed to the safe, ethical and responsible adoptionand enhancementof our AI capabilities to support our vision of improving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. - Scope The purpose of thisis AI transparency statementis toexplains how the NHFB intends to use AI and the measures we take to ensure it … AI technologies by the government. - Definitions #### What is AI?AI technology was agreed byThe Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)member countries in November 2023 to bedefineds AI as “a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, … how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Dif … s vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”dDepartment of Health, Disability and Ageing, along with other Commonwealth agencies, haves adopted the OECD definition of AI as outlined in the [Policy for the … of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf). ## AI transparency statement### Why we uThe NHFB **uses authorised AIThe National Health Funding Body (NHFB) seeks to enhance the quatools** (such as Anthropic’s Claude and Microsoft Copilot) on a limited basis, when undertaking routine internal administrative matters to maximise productivity, such as summarising internal politcyand efficiency of our services through our commitment to innovation and excellence. The NHFB may pursue utilising AI to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides while carefully managinformation and producing Minutes of internal meetings. The NHFB adopts a ‘ _**best practice, fit-for-purpose for a small agency’**_ approach across all business activity, including using AI. The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (Health) provides shared services to the NHFB, including IT services and related guidance. Health’s AI guidance specifies that only authorised AI tools may be introduced and used for approved use cases. The NHFB continues to assess available AI tools to determine the benefits the technology provides while ensuring that our AI initiatives align with our values and are ingtherisks to support our visionbest interests of the public. The NHFB is developing a strategic position on our AI adoption. The strategy will include the use ofimapproving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. ### How we use AI Ted AI tools that enhance the quality and efficiency of our services to support our commitment to innovation and excellence. The NHFB will also meet the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) requirements under its _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government(the policy) along with the Standard for AI transparency statements, Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools and Australia’s_. This includes having an AI use case register, AI impact assessments and clear guidance for staff about AIEethicsPprinciples, provides requirements for Australian Government agencies to use AI safely,. ### In-scope The NHFB is committed to the safe, ethical and responsiblye and ethically. This statement outlines how the NHFB will implement these policy requirements. The NHFB may use both generative and narrow model AI and idoption and enhancement of AI capabilities to support our vision of improving the transparency of public hospital funding in Australia. In accordance with the DTA’sCclassification systemsforuse, weAI in government, the NHFB may use AI as described below: - Usage Patterns – this includes providing insights through analytics,and enhancing workplace productivity. This allows our people to focus … may include corporate and enabling, service delivery and data analysis to identify patterns or anomalies in data to support legislative compliance. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains include: - Summarising reports, meeting minutes, and stakeholder feedback. - Drafting documentation. - Conducting general background research. All outputs generated with the assistance of AI in the NHFB will be assessed by ahumaperson as an ongoing operation to provide meaningful assessment and oversightand not for decision making purposes. ### Public interaction and impact At present, the NHFB does not utilise public facing AI applicationsto ensure accuracy and reliability of outcomes. ### Out-of-scope One of the NHFB’s key priorities is to ensure thate involve direct public interaction or significant public impact. This transparency statement will btegrity of public hospital funding by identifying and analysing public hospital services to minimise dupdated if this changes ### Ensuring safe and responsible use of AI The NHFB is committed to using AI responsibly and transparently, ensuring that our AI initiatives align with our values and are in the best interests of the public. We will continue to work closely with our Shared Services provider and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. We will be transparent as we enable, prepare, engage, and embrace responsibly the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. The NHFB will work to adopt our Shared Services provider AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DTA’s Policy, advice and guidance on for the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. We will also ensure these will conform with the proposed mandatory guiderails for AI in high-risk settings that are currently being developed by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources. We will leverage whole of Australian Governmenlicate payments made through other Commonwealth programs. This data is excluded from use in any AI capacity, until such time as AI tools are approved for this level of sensitive information. ### Compliance with relevant legislation As part of our adoption of AI technology, we are ensuring compliance with all relevant legislation: - Archives Act 1983 (Cth) - Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) - Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) - NHFB’s Privacy Policy. The NHFB will continue to evaluate, review or update our data governance requirements against the application of AI, to ensure our approach remains fit for purpose and in keeping with the provisions and the NHFB’s obligations under the _National Health Reform (NHR) Act 2011._ ### Public interaction and impact The NHFB does not utilise public facing AI applications that involve direct poublicies and internally develop additional policies and guidance materials as required for the following elements: - AI Governance and approval processes - Acceptable use of AI in the agency - Ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - Record keeping - Privacy and consent - Security, procurement of AI systems - Risk mitigation and technical guardrails - Roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internally developed policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. This tinteraction or significant public impact. This Statement will be updated if this changes. ### Accountable Official The NHFB’s Deputy Chief Executive Officer is appointed as the **AI Accountable Official** (AI AO). The AI AO oversees AI use cases and ensures we comply with whole-of-government AI policies and ethical guidelines. The AI AO will review the NHFB’s AI TransparencysStatementwill be updated as the NHFB continues to develop and evolve the usage, policies and technology. ### Accountable Official The Deputy Chief Executive Officeat least once a year and update it if we make any major changes to how we use AI, or isf appointed as our AI Accountable Official for the NHFB. ### How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any qnything new needs to be included. ### Contact us Questions about this statement or the NHFB’s use of AIyou can, please contact our AI Accountable Officialas follows: Evia email:Australia FriEmail: [nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Wed, 20256-02-285-06 12:00Only the rotating "related links" tiles at the foot of the museum's page changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CarVolunteers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/carsupport/volunteers)Join our team and help us tellOur volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storyies ofAustralian democracyOld Parliament House.  Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD. ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots. ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  We are a living museum of Australian political and social history.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.Only the site's rotating "related pages" navigation tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Reports, policies and planCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plancareers)FJoindourstrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) Discover the benefits of a partnership with MoAD.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?  Find our latest media releases, downloardof Old Parliament Hopublicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Hocareers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Censuse](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-hopolicies-and-plans/policies/APS-censuse) TheBoard directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [About Old Parliament HoAPS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.  ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **26 days ago**Rewrites the statement for policy v2.0, disclosing AI complaint summarisation and form population, adding prohibited uses and a Chief AI Officer, and dropping the annual review commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: AI summarises complaints for allocation and triage (not for deciding action)
- New disclosure: AI populates complaint forms from letters/emails, confirmed by an officer
- Adds prohibited uses: no AI statutory decisions, no AI-generated external communications
- Chief AI Officer named as approver for low/medium risk use cases; Executive Committee for high risk (none currently)
The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement ### Introduction The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)'s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-085-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20gGovernment%20v1.12.0_0.pdf) sets out the Australian Government approach toembrace the opportunities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) 1 and provide for safe and responsible use of AIArtificial Intelligence (AI). The Office of Commonwealth Ombudsman (the Office), including the ACT Ombudsman, is committed to identifyingethical, responsible and meaningful usage of AI toopportunities for AI to help us deliver our mission of _“helping people, improving government”_.We willAny use of AI bey transparent in our assessment, preparation, engagement, adoption, monitoring, and pivot to changes in AI technology, environment and policy requirements. ### Scope and Usage Currently, the Office uses AI for the following activities: 1. Support security monitoring of its ICT systems. This AI is embeddedhe Office is carefully considered for compatibility with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles and the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government. These require transparency in how AI is used by the Office. This statement explains: - the scope and classification system for AI use intothemonitoring software we use, with access limited to ICT and Cyber Security personnel that are suitably cleared, trained, and have a need to know and need to access the monitoring system. No direct public access. 1. AI Assistants to support code completion and programming. This AI is used to assist with developing, configuring, maintaining and testing commercial softwareOffice - ways we do and don’t use AI in the Office - the policy and governance for AI use in the Office. ### Tools in use The Office currently uses specific AI tools to make our work more efficient. This helps staff to focus on more complex and meaningful work. Currently, the Office uses.Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The use of these AI Coding Assistants is only for approved use cases of the Office’s system. All Human and AI assisted coding and system development, must undergo testing to ensure accuracy before being implement as part of the Office technical change management processes. The public does noI for the following activities: 1. To create a short summary of complaints to the Office. This summary is used to help us find the right team and staff member to assist with the complaint (“allocation”), and to help us prioritise the mostcurrgently access systems that are supported by thecomplaints (“triage”). These summaries are never used tools. 1. Use of Azure AI Text to Speech to support the cmake a decision about what action to take in relationof internal training materials based on a precise human generated text script. Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The Office has also completed pilots of two Microsoft AI capabilities – Microsoft Co-Pilot and Microsoft Azure AI services. The Azure AI pilot, within the Office secure IT environment, tested the feasibility of using Azure AI services to summarise written complaints for decision makers to review in order to process them. If we do implement any additional AI use cases and technologies, we will updato a complaint. 1. To populate complaint forms from information we receive by letter or email. This helps minimise manual data entry. These suggestions must be confirmed by an Officer before they are recorded. 1. To support security monitoring of our ICT systems. This AI is embedded into the monitoring software we use, and uses machine learning to help us identify new security threats. 1. To support development and programming. This is limited thiso statement to outline our use, with a summary of: - why the Office is using AI - the legislative authority for the use of AI - whether the public may directly interact with the AI or be significantly impacted by it - how the Office intends to notify those affected by our use of AI - what role AI plays in relation to decision-making, administrative action or service delivery, or other such usage patterns and domains as described in tff involved in developing new ICT capabilities in the Office and supports them with code completion. 1. We use Text-to-Speech software to support the creation of internal training materials based on a human generated text script. If we decide to use AI in new ways in the future, we will update this statement to explain how this may affect you. ### Scope and classification The Digital Transformation Agency publishes [Ca classificationssystemfor AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) - measures to identify and protect the public against negative impacts and other risk mitigation measures - measures in place to identify and remediate errors - how the use complies with administrative law principles, is consistent with human rights obligations, applicable legsites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%202.0_0.pdf) for the use of AI in government. In this system, the Office’s use of AI primarily falls into the **workplace productivity** pattern. This means we may use AI to automate routine tasks, manage workflows and to support triage and categorislationincluding the [Privacy Act 1988](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text) and the [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au) - compliance with each requirement under the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) _._ Tof communications. The Office uses AI in the **service delivery** domain, to support staff to register, categorise and triage complaints. We do not use AI in making decisions. We also use AI in the **corporate and enabling** domain, including HR, finance, media, communications, and IT. ### Prohibited use Certain uses of AI are prohibited within the Office. We doesnotcurrently use or intendallow staff to use AI tools to make discretionary decisions in accordance with the best practices set out in the Office’s [Automated Decision-making Better Practice Guide](https://www.ombudsman.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/288236/OMB1188-Automated-Decision-Making-Report_Final-A1898885.pdf). ### Governance **AI Governance**\ Each AI use case and AI technology in the Office requires the Ombudsman’s approval, after endorsement by the Information Technology Governance Committee (ITGC) chaired by the Deputy Ombudsman.ecisions under our legislation. Statutory decisions are always made by an Officer with the appropriate delegation. We also do not allow staff to use AI to generate text to be used in communications outside the Office. Our communications with complainants about their complaint are always written by an Officer. ### **AIUusagePpolicy andPprocesses**\We have an internal AI Policy that aligns with advice and guidance provided by the DTA and other agencies for using AI services responsibly.We have processes to ensure: - our AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible - our staff are appropriately trained in AI - any relevant and likely cyber, data and privacy risks are identified and addressed - our AI access and usage is monitored - our stakeholders have trust in our use of AI. ______________________________________________________________________ **This policy helps ensure: - we have a framework to adopt AI where it can support us to do our work more effectively and efficiently, consistent with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles - our AI use has appropriate governance - our staff are appropriately trained in AI systems - relevant risks are identified and appropriately treated - our use of AI supports our reputation and does not compromise stakeholder trust in our work. Each use case requires individual approval after a detailed impact assessment. Low and medium risk use cases can be approved by the Chief AI Officer. High risk use cases are considered by the Office's Executive Committee. The Office does not currently engage in any high-risk use of AI. ### Accountable Officials**\The Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer are the designated AI Accountable Officials.**Transparency Statement Updates**\ This statement will be reviewed annually or when we change our AI use cases and usage.### Contact For questions about this statement orfor further information onif you would like to make a complaint about how the Office’has usage of AI, please contacted AI you can do so by writing to: [ai@ombudsman.gov.au](mailto:ai@ombudsman.gov.au). ### ChangeLlog______________________________________________________________________**Date**| **Note**\ ---|---\27February 2025| Initial release.\20December 2025| Add AI Assistant for Code Completion and Programming Usage and Text to Speech for training materials.\ April 2026| Update to reflect revised AI Policy and new use cases. [1] [Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI …No change to the statement itself; only the rotating "related pages" navigation tiles at the foot of the page differ.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [CareerReports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careerreports-policies-and-plans)JoFind ourteam and help us tell the story of Australian democracystrategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  Do you have questions or feedback for us?### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Getting here anliament-House-Tom-Ferguson2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of OldpParkingliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories ofabout/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Conditions of entry](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/conditions-of-entry)  ### [APS Cens1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-censd-parliament-house)The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoADOld Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.Only the website's rotating related-page tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… eate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Venue hireCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Placareers) Joinyournext event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament Ho1/Statement-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact use](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Careers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/careers) Join our team and help us tell thcontact) Do you have questions or feedback for us? ### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young peoplestory of Australian democracybecome active citizens.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interv3/Volunteer-MoAD-Ben-Appleton.jpg.webp?h=3f01fd34&itok=whepK3BN) ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the storiewsand film shoots.  ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?6/careers-APS-census-MoAD-reopening.jpg.webp?h=b5dc55f7&itok=XJNPnfyS) ### [APS Census](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.Only the website's rotating promotional link tiles changed; the AI transparency statement text itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ate new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ### [Volunteer](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/volunteer) Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shootsenue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy.### [Learn](https://moadoph.gov.au/learn) Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  ### [Getting here and parking](https://moadoph.gov.au/visit/getting-here-and-parking) We are located inside Old Parliament House and you can get here by car, bus or bike.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)ment-Jack-Greens-paintings-MoAD-exhibition.jpg.webp?itok=TOI8cfOZ) ### [Contact us](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/contact) Do you have questions or feedback for us?The words that changed
… contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **3 hour2 days ago**Attorney-General's Department rewrites its statement, naming a Chief AI Officer and CIO as accountable official and adding sections on risks, monitoring and public interaction.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names the Chief Information Officer as accountable official and appoints a Chief AI Officer under the APS AI Plan
- New commitment that AI use is confined to non-decision-making activities and does not directly interact with the public, with mandatory human oversight
- New 'Public interaction and significant impact' section stating no deployed system affects individuals without human review
- New 'Risks and mitigations' section (incorrect outputs, training bias, use beyond purpose) with controls including approved tools only and mandatory staff training
The words that changed
# Attorney-General’s Department Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Print ## Introduction We are trialling the use ofAartificialIintelligence (AI)as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to harness analytical tools and techniques to: - predict service needs - improve user experience - support evidence-based decisions - gain efficiencies in agency operations. We are committed to ensuring the way we develop, deploy and use AI systems is transparent, accountable and fairto help our staff work more effectively and support the department's responsibilities.\ We are using AI to: - summarise and compare information to - support policy and legal work - draft and refine routine internal content to improve consistency and timeliness - classify and manage documents to support records and information management - identify patterns and unusual activity in system information to support cyber security and protective practices. We only use AI where it is appropriate for the task and the information involved. AI supports staff, but it does not replace human judgement – staff remain accountable for decisions and for any content or actions informed by AI. We are committed to using AI in ways that are transparent, accountable and fair. Our use of AI is confined to non‑decision making activities and does not directly interact with the public. All AI use is subject to governance arrangements and mandatory human oversight. This transparency statement explains the AI systems we use, how they function,and the data they rely on.’'s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and the requirements for AI transparency. Itisalsopart ofreflects our ongoing commitment to safe and responsible use of AI and innovati … ply these technologies to: - automate routine administrative tasks -assist with drafthelp draft and refinge routine, internal and non-sensitive communicntent - summarise publicly available reports and synthesise information from multiple sources - simplify or clarify content to make it easier to understand - support research by identifying publicly available information and relevant references - provide analytical support, such as outlining options, risks or considerations - automate document classification and categorisation - analyse sentiment to understand patterns and trends in large data sets -categorise documents using predictive analyticsupport information security by analysing system activity to detect behaviour that differs from normal usage patterns and generate alerts for human review. ### Future use of AI Any expansion of our AI use will be subject to: - risk assessment - approval through established governance processes - compliance with the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_. We will update this transparency statement if our use of AI changes. ## Data privacy and securityPWe are committed to protecting the privacy and security of personal, sensitive and classified informationis of paramount importance to us. We en. We make sure that any data used in AI systems is handled inaccordancline with the [ _Privacy Act 1988_ (Cth) ](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), the [ _Protective Security Policy Framework_](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/) and other relevant data protection laws.Personal information isWe only collected, used,and shared wherepersonal information when necessary,and in ways that comply with our [privacy policy](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy"Privacy policy"). ## AI governance and oversight We havedevelopedguidance material andimplementedrigorous governance processes in place to monitor and oversee the use of AI within the department. This includes: - appointingaccountable officialsthe Chief Information Officer as the accountable official and a Chief AI Officer in line with the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_ and AI Plan for the Australian Public Service - ensuring governance bodieshaveoversight ofee all AI projectswithin the department- developing policiesguidingfor staff use of AI and information technology systems - making AI traini … ectively within the department - maintaining user accreditation under_the _Data Availability and Transparency Act 2022_ - implementing the Commonwealth’'s AIAssurance Framework. ## Usage patterns and domains The followingImpact Assessment tool. ## Monitoring and assurance We monitor AI use through a combination of policy controls, user guidance and ongoing review. This includes: - monitoring authorised use of AI tools - requiring staff to check outputs for accuracy and appropriateness - reviewing AI use as part of broader information and technology governance activities. Staff can report inappropriate outputs, privacy or security concerns, or unintended disclosure of information. The appropriate areas then investigate these reports. If issues are identified, we may restrict, correct or pause AI use while we complete a full assessment. ## Usage patterns and domains This section shows how we classify our AI use and the domainsin whichwhere we apply it, in keep. This is in linge with the [Classification system for AI use ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) u … ## Usage patterns The following usage patterns describe our use of AI: - analytics for insights - workplace productivity - image processing. ### Doma. #### Analytics for insights We use AI to help analyse large amounts of data and identify patterns or trends that may not be obvious. This can support better understanding of issues, improve planning and inform policy or service delivery. AI provides insights and summaries only. Staff review and interpret the results before they are used. #### Workplace productivity We use AI tools to assist staff with everyday tasks such as drafting documents, summarising information and organising work. This improves efficiency and allows staff to focus on more complex or high-value work. Staff review and edit any AI-generated content before it is used. AI does not replace human judgement. #### Image processinsg Weapply AI tools across the department in the following domains: - service delivery - compliance and fraud detection - policy and legal - corporate and enabling services. ## Continuous improvement As part of our ongoing commitment to responsible AI, wuse AI to analyse and process images, such as identifying objects, features or patterns in photos or scanned documents. This supports tasks like classification, quality checks, or record management. Staff check all results to make sure they are accurate and appropriate. ### Domains We use AI in the following domains: - service delivery - compliance and fraud detection - policy and legal - corporate and enabling services. ## Public interaction and significant impact The _Standard for AI transparency statements_ guidance requires agencies to provide classification details for AI use where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI or its outputs without human review. None of our currently deployed AI systems result in direct public interaction or generate outputs that significantly impact an individual without mandatory human review. Although we use technologies such as generative AI, chatbots and natural language processing across domains including service delivery, these systems are exclusively designed to assist staff with internal processes, analysis and administrative tasks. All AI outputs and recommendations that could potentially impact a member of the public are subject to **mandatory human oversight and approval** before any final action or communication takes place. ## Risks and mitigations Our AI use presents risks that include: - incorrect or incomplete outputs - bias introduced through model training - use beyond intended purposes. We manage these risks through defined controls. These include: - restricting AI use to approved tools, - only allowing the use of publicly available AI tools with information already in the public domain - mandating AI training for staff - requiring staff to independently verify AI outputs. Our guidance makes it clear that AI outputs are not authoritative and any identified issues may lead to corrective action, restrictions or stopping use of the tool. ## Continuous improvement We regularly review and update our AI policies and practices. This includesstaying informed aboutkeeping up to date with new developments in AI technology, ethics,and regulatory requirements.systemsuse through continuous learning andadaptationimprovement. We will review this statement: - every year annually,- when we make a significant change to ourapproach to AI, orAI use - when new factorsimpaaffect this statement. ## Contactinformation We are committed to engaging with stakeholders and providing opportunities for feedbackus We value feedback and engagement on our use of AIsystems. If you have questions,or concerns, or would like more information about how we use AI,please [contact us using the [departmental contactusform](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/contact-us"Contact us").). **Due for review:** 1 November 2026, or upon significant changeThe words that changed
# WGEA AI transparency statement In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use\Consistent with Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government, an AI system is a\At this time, WGEA does not employ AI in service delivery. AI is not use in compliance,\## Monitoring and Accountability The Chief Operating Officer was designated as the accountable official on 19 December\. As the accountable official, the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for ensuring the\## Responsible AI usage policy As part of the governance of AI use in the Agency, a responsible AI usage policy will beSame statement recaptured in a cleaner layout, with PDF page headers and "OFFICIAL" markings dropped and headings and bullets restored.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
CM. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIAL# AI transparency statement This statement provides details of how the Royal Australian Mint (the Mint) uses AI, as directed by the\### Usage patterns•- Workplace Productivity•- Image Processing ### Domains•- Corporate and enabling•- Service Delivery•- Compliance and fraud detection•- Policy and legal In the use of Image Processing, the Mint uses basic shape recognition for identifying humans. The Mint\At this time, the Mint does not use AI in a way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be\As a part of its commitment to responsible use of AI, including ensuring accountability for accuracy and•- human, societal and environmental wellbeing\ •- human-centered values\ •- fairness\ •- privacy protection and security\ •- reliability and safety\ •- transparency and explainability\ •- contestability\ •- accountability.OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2The Mint is committed to applying the cyber security requirements outlined in the Australian Government\The Mint will ensure integration with the whole of government approach to AI adoption, participating in\AI forums and processes where applicable. To this end, this statement will be updated as required to\This review will be conducted annually, or when there is change to how AI is used at the Mint. ## Controlled content information - Controlled by John Cock, CISO - Date of effect 25 March 2026 - Approved by Emily Martin, CEO - Document no. D25/8915 - CM container 25/347 - Contact Melinda HodgesThe words that changed
# Policy for the responsible use of AI in government –•- Automating routine administrative tasks•- Assisting with developing routine internal and non-sensitive communications•- Sentiment analysis to understand patterns and trends in large data sets ## Data privacy and security Protecting the privacy and security of individuals' data, sensitive and classified•- Appointment of an Accountable Official in accordance with Policy for the•- Establishing mechanisms for oversight of all AI projects by senior management•- Developing policies relating to use of AI and information technology systems by•- Availability of AI training for all staff.•- Using the Commonwealth’s AI Assurance Framework for new uses of AI. ## Usage patterns and domains The following section identifies OPC’s classification of AI use and the domains where•- Decision making and administrative action•- Analytics for insights•- Workplace productivity•- Image processing ### Domains The following domains describe the domains where AI tools are applied across OPC:•- Service delivery•- Compliance and fraud detection•- Policy and legal•- Corporate and enabling services. ## Continuous improvement As part of our ongoing commitment to responsible AI, we will regularly review and\ •- Email: enquiries@opc.gov.au\ •- Mailing Address: Locked Bag 30, Kingston ACT 2604, AUSTRALIASame statement re-captured in a cleaner layout with proper headings and bullets; no wording or substance changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
taxombudsman.gov.au# AI transparency statement•- in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint•- in the domain of corporate and enabling, through the granting general access to•- in the usage pattern of workplace productivity, such as by automating tasks and•- in the usage pattern of analytics for insights, such as by debugging code used intaxombudsman.gov.au## AI safety and governance•- Staff are required to read and accept these conditions of use.•- Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically.•- Staff are only permitted to use enterprise AI technology and are restricted fromtaxombudsman.gov.auSame statement text re-captured in a cleaner layout with proper headings and bullets; no wording or substance changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL# Artificial Intelligence (AI)\December 2025 The High Speed Rail Authority (the Authority) follows the Australian Government’s Policy\## Purpose for using AI or considering its adoption The Authority is exploring the use of AI to deliver improved performance and value across planning, delivery,•- Drive productivity through streamlined, data-driven workflows and faster iteration.•- Reduce costs via predictive analytics, optimisation, and automation.•- Enhance safety with intelligent monitoring, risk detection, and predictive maintenance•- Elevate customer experience through real-time support, personalised seamless journeys•- Create long-term public value by enabling sustainable operations, regional connectivity, and economic•- Partnering with third parties such as contractors, advisors, and other government agencies who may•- Leveraging AI assistants embedded in widely available corporate solutions to improve collaboration and•- Usage patterns are expected to be as follows:\ o- Decision making and administrative action – Supporting, not replacing, human decision-o- Analytics for insights – This is a core component of our AI roadmap.o- Workplace productivity – This will be a strong focus for our corporate and enabling functions.•- Domains are proposed to be:\ o- Service delivery – Key applications may include modelling passenger demand, optimisingOFFICIAL OFFICIAL o- Compliance and fraud detection – AI models may be used to support procurement oversight\ o- Policy and legal – AI may be used to simulate policy outcomes, analyse regulatory implications,\ o- Corporate and enabling – AI may be applied across corporate functions, including\The Authority is committed to ensuring any future adoption of AI technology aligns with Australia’s AI ethical\Information provided to the Authority is handled in compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 and the Authority’s\## Measures to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes The Authority is establishing suitable governance and oversight arrangements to support future AI use. This\AI-related risks are included in the Authority’s risk management framework to ensure appropriate oversight\Where the Authority engages contractors, advisors, or third-party service providers for AI solutions, their use\The Authority will seek independent third-party audits where appropriate, and maintain an up-to-date AI use\Staff training on AI is an important consideration of the governance and oversight protocols being developed.\The General Manager Customer Place and Operations is the Accountable official for AI in the Authority. This Transparency Statement was last updated in December 2025, and will be updated annually or if theSame statement re-captured with proper markdown headings and bullets instead of raw PDF text; no wording changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1# AI Transparency Statement ## Introduction This statement outlines how the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Agency) uses artificial\The Agency is committed to a safe and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting\Compliance and fraud\Law enforcement,\Policy and legal Internal use Internal use\Scientific\Corporate and enabling Internal use Internal usewww.fairwork.gov.au Page 2## Governance To ensure appropriate AI governance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated•- AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI•- Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation•- Risk assessment•- Executive oversight: The AO provides high•- Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is continually monitored by authorised staff\## Compliance The Agency is compliant with the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0. We have\## Reviews, update, and contact information This transparency statement was last updated on 27 February 2026. It will be reviewed and updated:•- at least once a year•- when making a significant change to the Agency's approach to AI•- when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. For any enquiries or comments regarding this statement, please contact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.Identical text captured with proper Markdown headings and lists instead of the earlier flat PDF-style extraction; no wording changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI)’'s (DTA) Policy for responsible use•- safe and responsible use of AI•- ensuring AI implementation aligns with Australian Public Service values and prioritises staff•- h•- t•- scientific\ •- corporate and enabling ### Use We may use AI in the following ways.\#### Automate or simplify routine tasks\ •- Using AI to help our organisation to be more productive, by:o- supporting workflow management,\ o- reducing administrative burden, and\ o- enhancing communications. #### Support decision making and administrative actions\ •- Using AI to guide, assess or make recommendations to a human decision maker.\#### Identify, understand and present insights•- Using AI to support data analysis and reporting. #### Support software development•- Using AI to assist technical staff with drafting and reviewing code, while maintaining human\We use advanced computational science, such as advanced statistical techniques and•- process large volumes of data, and•- perform complex calculations to produce forecast outputs. We also use machine learning to calibrate, verify and automate these outputs. Our scientists and•- research,•- testing, and•- assurance.\This includes machine learning and AI in forecasting services. All key applications used to generate forecasts are built specifically for our use. They are built,\## Monitoring\Our executive team oversees the Bureau's strategic direction and use of AI. This involves regular\## Compliance The Bureau has adopted Australia’'s 8 AI ethics principles. We have internal guidelines to ensure\The guidelines include activities to help the Bureau apply each principle in practice. These\The Bureau will:•- use AI according to relevant legislation, frameworks and policies•- follow mandatory requirements in the Policy for responsible use of AI in government. We will regularly review compliance to the Australian Government's AI policy landscape. This will\AI use in the Bureau's forecasting and prediction services:•- accords with research guidelines, and\ •- complies with the usual standard of scientific scrutiny.\## Accountable Official The Bureau's Chief Information and Technology Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This\## Contact for AI enquiries For questions about this statement, contact us. ## Updates to this statement This statement was last updated on 2 March 2026. We review and update this statement yearly, or•- our approach to AI changes, or•- there is material change to its accuracy.Identical text captured with cleaner PDF-to-markdown conversion: proper headings, bullets and unwrapped paragraphs, with stray page numbers dropped.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM # AI TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT April 20252## 1. Introduction•- How we use and manage AI•- How we ensure safe and responsible usage•- Compliance to the Policy ## 2\. How we use AI ANMM adheres to Australia’'s AI Ethics Principles, demonstrating our commitment to protecting\ANMM uses AI in some of its corporate and enabling activities and workplace productivity. We allow\AI is used by our staff in the following areas:•- planning stages of creative work•- to assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documents, emails or other content•- to assist in some administrative functions\ •- assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts•- data analytics and reporting•- people counting•- cyber security monitoring and response activities AI is not widely used across ANMM systems, however we recognise that AI is an increasingly\Where AI components have been incorporated into proprietary software or ICT products used by•- there is a demonstrated benefit to ANMM's audience; and•- the Museum’'s data governance and compliance requirements are met.3## 5. Safe and responsible Usage\ •- Only deploy AI tools that are authorised for access and use within ANMM.•- Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions.•- AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information.•- AI must not be the final decision-maker.1## 6. Compliance\This statement will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI,Same statement text, now captured as clean markdown headings and bullets instead of raw PDF line breaks and OFFICIAL markings.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Classification: OFFICIAL# Australian Electoral Commission Artificial\## Background The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) notes the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in\Consistent with the Policy, the AEC has provided the Digital Transformation Agency a link to this\The Policy also requires the AEC to nominate an accountable official for the implementation of the’'s AI Accountable Official is the First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise\## The AEC’'s use of AI We have an internal policy on the use of AI by staff, which staff are required to follow when using\ •- not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without human review•- understand safe and responsible use of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework•- not use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to assess potential AI tools for use’'s use of AI includes:•- GitHub Copilot - GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed to•- Microsoft 365 Copilot - The AEC is conducting a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot’'s use of Microsoft co-pilot makes certain high-volume, manual tasks\ •- Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat - By enabling Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff, the AEC is’'s use of’s's enterprise grade security controls and it is not used to train AI models.•- Other – Some AEC staff have access to assistive and adaptive technologies such as\speech-to-text software along with a limited number of staff in our graphical design area whoOFFICIALKey election operations – including voting and the counting process – are undertaken manually, in\The AEC uses AI in the following domain and usage pattern:•- Domain: Corporate and enabling. The AEC’'s current use relates to supporting corporate•- Usage pattern: Workplace productivity. The AEC’'s current use is for workplace productivity’'s use of AI”". ## Third-party suppliers The AEC has processes in place to manage the potential use of AI by third-party suppliers.\For applicable agreements (i.e. managed service arrangements), the AEC contractually requires that\In cases where the provider is delivering an IT capability that processes AEC data, such solutions are’'s review and approval through its governance processes. Any potential utilisation•- overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and agency direction•- chaired by the Australian Electoral CommissionerOFFICIAL •- approves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with the Investment•- security and risk considerations relating to AI use•- strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI use. Advisory Audit Committee:•- established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA•- Privacy Act 1988: Regulates the collection, storage, and use of personal information by AI•- Archives Act 1983: Governs records created by AI•- Freedom of Information Act 1982: Provides public access to documents created by AI. ### Oversight and Audits•- Compliance overseen by the SEC.•- Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance.•- The Regulatory Action Plan guides the AEC's approach to regulatory compliance, including’'s AI Accountable Officer. ## Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.auIdentical text captured with a cleaner PDF-to-markdown conversion, dropping repeated page headers and adding proper headings and lists.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement February 2025Page 1 of 3This document is designed for online viewing.\Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 # ACQSC AI Transparency Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) employs Artificial Intelligence (AI)•- Policy for the responsible use of AI in government•- Standard for accountable officials•- Standard for AI transparency statements•- Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools•- Australia’'s AI Ethics Principles ## Our stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)‘'An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the’' The Commission’'s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing ourAI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026## How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s's classification system:•- Usage patterns:o- Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, ando- Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ •- Domains:o- Compliance,o- Corporate and enabling, ando- Service delivery. ## Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission•- The Commission ensures that AI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests•- The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation,\The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to’'s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage’'s ongoing commitment to maintain robustAI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 3 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops\## Accountable Official The Commission’'s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI\## How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or the Commission’'s use of AI, you can contact the\ •- email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 2026The words that changed
WGEA AI transparency statementScreen Australia's statement is republished with different formatting, heading levels, italics and a few updated or added hyperlinks, but no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
______________________________________________________________________ ##**AI Transparency Statement**Screen Australia is committed to safe, ethical, and responsible use … the principles outlined by the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [ _Policy for therResponsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai/ai-in-government-policy),_,_ this statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption, and how AI related risks are being managed. #### How we use AI Screen Australia enables staff and contractors to u … and maintaining public trust. In March 2026, we updated our internal _Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia Employees & Contractors._ The policy incorporates the Australian Government’s [_AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) \_\_ and [_Staff guidance on public generative AI._](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai).\_\_ We also implemented mandatory training for staff on the responsible u … - are fully accountable for all work products, advice and decisionsscreen-australia/about-us/doing-business-with-us/terms-of-trade/), the relevant program guidelines, and any applicable laws. We are co … ble use of AI. In September 2024, Screen Australia published a set of,_](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/corporate-documents/policies/ai-guiding-principles/) _,_ which publicly articulates our expectations around the proposed use o … key principles are: - Talent, creativity, culture and the individual& Cand compliance Screen Australia has a risk-based approach to the use of AI … ilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use casesThe words that changed
CM. No. D25/8915The words that changed
… ormation/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Risk Officer ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/appointment-and-authorisation-instrument-chief-risk-officer) - [ Delegation of human resources powers and functions ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/delegation-of-human-resources-powers-and-functions) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corp …No change to the statement itself; only a stray "Print this page" page widget dropped out of the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).Print this page \_\_## Purpose of AI Use The NHMRC encourages the use of AI to achieve pr …Only an "Email this page" share link disappeared from the captured page furniture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… al information where we are authorised to do so under the Privacy Act.- \[Email\](mailto:?subject=Privacy and disclosures&body=https://www.nema.gov.au/about-us/privacy-disclosures "Email this page")Only the rotating "you may also be interested in" promo tiles at the foot of the page changed; the AI statement itself is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ##You may also be interested in...  Our volunteers are ambassadors for MoAD, sharing the stories of Old Parliament House.  ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategBW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews andpolicies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  The Board directs the objectives, strategies and policies followed by Old Parliament House.  ### [APS CensuCareers](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/policies-and-plans/policies/APS-census) The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD. careers) Join our team and help us tell the story of Australian democracy. ### [MediaLearn](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  ### [Venue hire](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/venue-hire) Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.curtins.jpg.webp?h=a1873a58&itok=M_MkON-7) ### [Access to information](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/access-to-information)- IP Australiafirst tracked
The words that changed
OFFICIALThe words that changed
OFFICIALThe words that changed
www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1The words that changed
… _Postal Address:_\ Commonwealth DPP\ GPO Box 3104\ CANBERRA ACT 2601This statement was last updated in February 2026 and will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every 12 months.The words that changed
Artificial Intelligence (AI)A site-wide alert banner about supply chain disruptions leaked into the capture; the statement itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to content or footer close info For Australian businesses experiencing supply chain volatility and disruptions, visit the [Go Global Toolkit](https://export.business.gov.au/find-export-markets/middle-east-updates-and-support) for the latest updates and support available. ## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition o …Capture now picks up the museum's actual April 2025 AI transparency statement instead of its general governance web page; no agency edit involved.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
  # GovernanceGovernance ## The Australian National Maritime Museum connects Australians with the past, present and future of our oceans and waterways. The museum is committed to meeting the needs and requirements of Government, our visitors and stakeholders. This page outlines the governance systems and processes at the museum. ## Legislation and Government The museum is a Corporate Commonwealth Entity within the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts. This section outlines the key pieces of legislation which define the functions and activities of the museum. Australian National Maritime Museum Act 1990 Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 Public Service Act 1999 Statement of expectations Statement of intent ## Council and committees [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/museum-council "Museum Council") pages ### [Museum Council](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/museum-council) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/audit-finance-and-risk-committee "Audit Finance and Risk Committee") pages ### [Audit Finance and Risk Committee](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/audit-finance-and-risk-committee) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/first-nations-advisory-committee "First Nations Advisory Committee") pages ### [First Nations Advisory Committee](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/first-nations-advisory-committee) ## Reports and plans Strategic Framework Corporate Plan Annual reports APS Census and action plan Procedures for determining breaches of the APS Code of conduct AI Transparency Statement Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2024-2027 Reconciliation Action Plan Information Publication Plan ## Policies and procedures [Child safety and wellbeing policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4340) [Collection development policy framework and priorities](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3392) [Complaints handling procedure](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3341) [Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/1182) [Investment strategy policy ](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3393) [Partnership and sponsorship policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4341) [Privacy policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/1964) [Social media policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4338) [Volunteer policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4332) [Work health and safety policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4339) For further information or to request access to other museum policies, please email [anmmcoord@sea.museum](mailto:anmmcoord@sea.museum)  Photo by: Jasmine Poole  Photo by: Anthony Smith Media  Photo by: Lauren Trompp  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Brendon Thorne  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovshi 1 - 8 ## Access to information ### Freedom of Information The Australian National Maritime Museum is a Commonwealth statutory authority and makes information about its activities available to the public in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, 1982 (FOI Act). [Freedom of Information](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/freedom-of-information) ### Published File List File list for [1 July to 31 December 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2026-02/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2025.pdf) (pdf, 71kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-08/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2025.pdf) (pdf, 73kb) File list for [1 July to 31 December 2024](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-02/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2024.pdf) (pdf, 71kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2024](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-02/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2024.pdf) (pdf, 76kb) File list for [1 July to 31 December 2023](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2023.pdf) (pdf, 70kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2023](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2023.pdf) (pdf, 436kb) ### Public Interest Disclosures The Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (PID Act) which commenced on 15 January 2014 promotes integrity and accountability in the Australian public sector by encouraging the disclosure of information about suspected wrongdoing, protecting people who make disclosures and requiring agencies to take action. [Public Interest Disclosures](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/public-interest-disclosures) ### Gifts and benefits register Agency heads must publish a register of gifts and benefits they accept on their agency website on a quarterly basis. [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/gifts-and-benefits-register) ## Contracts Under the Senate Order for entity contracts, the following document sets out contracts entered into by the Australian National Maritime Museum that provide for a consideration to the value of $100,000 or more (GST inclusive) [Entity Contracts listing for 1 Jan to 30 Dec 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2026-02/reportable-contracts-list-jan-dec-2025.pdf) ## Privacy Impact Assessment Register Under section 15(1) of the Privacy (Australian Government Agencies – Governance) APP Code 2017 (Privacy Code), the museum is required to “maintain a register of the Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) it conducts. An agency must publish the register, or a version of the register, on its website”. The museum’s PIA Register is shown below.\ ID: PIA001\ Project Name: Welcome Wall 2.0\ Date: 16/1/2019  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Brendon Thorne  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Lauren Trompp  Photo by: Cassandra Hannagan Photography   Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley 1 - 8AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM AI TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT April 2025 2 1. Introduction The Australian National Maritime Museum (ANMM) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI offers significant opportunities to improve productivity and aim to continuously improve our Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities. We will be transparent as we engage, integrate and adapt to changes in AI technology, the environment, and government policy requirements. We govern our AI usage in line with applicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (the Policy) and best practice. The Policy sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI while providing for safe and responsible use of AI. ANMM believes transparency is critical to building public trust and it is an important aim of the Museum, as well as the Policy and the broader APS Reform agenda. In this statement, we describe: • How we use and manage AI • How we ensure safe and responsible usage • Compliance to the Policy 2\. How we use AI ANMM adheres to Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, demonstrating our commitment to protecting privacy and security. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.\ ANMM uses AI in some of its corporate and enabling activities and workplace productivity. We allow some of our staff to use AI in their work with the objective of enhancing productivity and service delivery.\ AI is used by our staff in the following areas: • planning stages of creative work • to assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documents, emails or other content • to assist in some administrative functions\ • assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts • data analytics and reporting • people counting • cyber security monitoring and response activities AI is not widely used across ANMM systems, however we recognise that AI is an increasingly prevalent and critical component of many systems and usage is increasing. We will use AI for its benefits in creating business efficiencies and reducing human error.\ Where AI components have been incorporated into proprietary software or ICT products used by ANMM, we will consider using these components if: • there is a demonstrated benefit to ANMM's audience; and • the Museum’s data governance and compliance requirements are met. 3 5. Safe and responsible Usage We are aware of potential risks and take a risk-managed approach to the adoption of AI. We use forms of AI which present low potential risk, and our AI governance ensures appropriate mitigation and management of risks. Risks are reviewed periodically and the Museum monitors usage and impact. ANMM has additional backups and audit arrangements in place to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of our data. The Museum has committed to:\ • Only deploy AI tools that are authorised for access and use within ANMM. • Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. • AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. • AI must not be the final decision-maker. 1. Compliance The Museum complies with all applicable legislation and regulations and each requirement under the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government.\ This statement will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement. For further information or enquiries about our adoption of AI please use our general enquiry email address info@sea.museumNo agency edit: the contact email now appears masked by the site's email-protection script rather than as a real address change.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… **Contact** For enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of AI, contact: [info@alrc.gov.au](mailto:info@alrc.gov.au)email protected]No change by the agency; only page sharing widget text was captured differently.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AI transparency statementPrint this page Click to open the social media sharing options Share[ Share via Facebook ](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=ht …The words that changed
Classification: OFFICIALThe words that changed
[Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.") # AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence [Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.")# AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence Release date and time 24/07/2025 11:30am AEST In accordance with t …Safe Work Australia rewrites its statement, naming a Chief AI Officer and new accountable official, adding mandatory staff training, and dropping its public-interaction and DTA-compliance commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief Information Officer named AI Accountable Official and Chief Operating Officer named Chief AI Officer
- Removed: commitment not to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it
- Removed: prior accountable official (Group Manager, Corporate & Engagement, designated 9 December 2024)
- Removed: statement of compliance with all mandatory DTA policy requirements
The words that changed
## Official Roles Safe Work Australiais developing its maturity and potential use cases for AI. While those use cases remain under consideration, AI usage is limited at the Agency. When discussing AI, we apply the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition](https://www.oecd.org/en.html): > An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content,has appointed its Chief Information Officer to the role of AI Accountable Official and the Chief Operating Officer to the role of Chief AI Officer. ## Safe Work Australia’s Approach to AI Adoption and Use We are commendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## AI use Safe Work Australia has very limited AI usage. Any changes to our AI use will result in an update to this Transparency Statement.\ Safe Work Australia uses AI to perform research and analytics for insights to support our policy and legal functions. We havitted to exploring the safe and responsible adoption of AI to improve service delivery, policy outcomes and productivity while ensuring public trust is maintained. Safe Work Australia currently uses AI to: - support corporate anAId enabled application that can analyse large volumes of legal documentation to perform first level research, and an AI enabled application that aggregates data inputs for consumption. ### Usage Patterns Safe Work Australia employs AI in the following way: - Aing functions. - provide analytics for insights:where AI identifies, produces or understands insightsabout a materialvia comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling, and/or reporting tools.### Domains Our AI applications focus on: - Policy and Legal Functions: A- analysespolicies and legal documents to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws.### Ensuring Responsible Use - Safe Work Australia safeguards against risks and ensures responsible AI use through releasing an annual AI Transparency Statement to provide visibility on how AI is used and managed. ## Public interaction and impact We do not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it.\ Monitoring AI effectiveness and negative impacts ## Training and assistance All staff have accessSafe Work Australia has processes in place to ensure our AI use is appropriately governed and our AI access and usage is monitored. Prior totrgainingon the appropriate use ofaccess to AI, services and are encouraged to report concerns to the AI Accountable Official. ### Compliance We will only use AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. Safe Work Australia is committed to adapting our AI systems and advice as needed to align with evolving legislation, ethical standards, and public expectations. ### Policy for the responsible use of AI in government We comply with all mandatory requirements of the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. ### Accountable official The Group Manager, Corporate & Engagement was designated as the accountable official on 9 December 2024. ### AI transparency statement The AI transparency statement was first published to our website on 28 February 2025.taff must complete mandatory training. For further information or enquiries about Safe Work Australia’s adoption of AI, you can contact us directly at [businessservices@swa.gov.au](mailto:businessservices@swa.gov.au) _Theis statement will be reviewed annuallyorwhen we make a significant changes occur. ### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further information on the Agency’s usage of AI, please contact [businessservices@swa.gov.au](mailto:businessservices@swa.gov.au).to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement._Comcare now discloses it is exploring limited AI use for internal analysis and productivity, and is building a risk-based governance framework, with an April 2026 review.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: AI being explored in a limited, controlled way for internal analysis, information management and workplace productivity
- New commitment to a targeted, DTA-aligned risk-based framework for identifying, governing and overseeing AI use
- Statement reviewed April 2026; review trigger reworded to a 'material change' in AI use
- New 'Responsible use commitments' heading
The words that changed
… tive information of its employees or customers into AI technologies. Comcare currently is exploring the use of AI in a limited and controlled manner, primarily to support internal analysis, information management, and workplace productivity. Comcare is undertaking a targeted program of work, aligned to Digital Transformation Agency guidance, to establish a practical, risk‑based framework for identifying, governing, and overseeing AI use across the agency. The focus is on strengthening governance, decision‑making, assurance, and visibility of AI activity, rather than delivering individual AI solutions. This governance uplift will guide future AI adoption at Comcare. ## Responsible use commitments Comcare sees benefits from using AI to improve the analysis and commun … AI usage to ensure continued security and compliance. This statementhwasbeen**published in February 2025 and reviewed in April 2026**. It will be reviewed annually, or earlier ifComcare's adoption of AI changesthere is a material change to Comcare’s use of AI. ## Contact us Comcare's Chief Information Office is designated as … ial under the Policy. If you have any enquiries about this statement,we can be reachedplease contact us via the details on the [contact us](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/contact/contact-us "Contact us") page of this website. Page last reviewed: **20 day3 hours ago**NEMA tidies punctuation, italicises Act titles and reformats a list on its combined privacy page; the AI transparency content is unchanged in substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… tted to treating complaints seriously. This page provides information on our Agency’s obligations for handling personal information under the _Privacy Act 1988_ , how to raise concerns of wrongdoing under the provisions of the _Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013,_ and procurements that are not in the public interest if suspended whi … ficial Intelligence (AI) to help with preparedness, response, recovery,and risk reduction for all hazards, and to improve organisational eff … NEMA’s AI potential use cases are led by our AI Accountable Official-, the Chief Data Officer. This official ensures the safe, ethical, and … subscription service to you. Website privacy statement This websiteis, nema.gov.au, and ausalert.gov.au are managed by us (the Agency). This notification of collection outlines … nd disclosure of your personal information in relation to your use ofthiseither website in accordance with the _Privacy Act 1988_. Learn more about our handling of personal information in our Privac … nformation #### Clickstream data (information logged) When visitingthiseither site, a record of your visit is logged. This ‘clickstream data’ is collected for statistical purposes and is used to help improve thise website and the experience of visitors. The following information is … (for example Windows, MAC) - your top-level domain name (for example.com,nema.gov.au) - the date and time of your visit to the site - the pages accessed - the documents downloaded - the previous site visited - the type of browser used. ### Disclosure We’ll only disclose your p …Adds a highlighted block announcing a new generative AI policy for ARC grant programs taking effect 28 April 2026, replacing the old inline policy link.
read by Claude Opus 5- New 2026 policy on generative AI in ARC grant programs, effective 28 April 2026, with fresh link
- States the policy covers all grant programs and guides applicants, administering organisations and assessors
- Removed: inline link to the earlier generative AI policy for grant applicants and assessors
The words that changed
… ARC has a separate policy to outline its expectations for the use of[_AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors_](https://www.arc.gov.au/node/11917 "Policy on Use of G. ## Use of generative artificial intelligence in ARC grant programs - applies to all ARC grant programs - provides guidance for applicants, administering organisations and assessors - takes effect from **28 April 2026** [Read the policy](https://www.arc.gov.au/publications/policy-use-generativeA-artificialI-intelligencein the ARC's-arcs-grant").-2026) To ensure the appropriate, responsible and ethical application of AI …Records a February 2026 annual review in place of the original February 2025 publication date, and widens the review trigger to include government-wide AI changes.
read by Claude Opus 5- Now states the statement was last reviewed in February 2026 (previously only noted first publication in February 2025)
- Review commitment reworded to 'at least annually' and triggered by changes to ACMA's or the Government's approach to AI
The words that changed
… l. ### AI transparency statement This AI transparency statement wasfirst publishlast reviewed in February 20256. This statement will be reviewed at least annually, orwhen anyat any time where a significant change is made to our or the Government’s approach to AI. [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26 ](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)The previous capture had failed, grabbing only a "Back to top" link; this capture restores Defence Housing Australia's full statement text.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Back to top## **Introduction** Defence Housing Australia (DHA) is committed to the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance our services and operations while ensuring transparency, accountability, and the protection of privacy. This AI Transparency Statement outlines DHA’s approach to integrating AI technologies and how DHA will prioritise fairness, security, and transparency in all AI-driven initiatives. ## **Initiatives** DHA recognises the unique characteristics of AI systems means traditional governance approaches may not be appropriate. Therefore, DHA has committed to an AI Program of work to lay the foundations for AI readiness, compliance and benefits realisation. DHA’s AI Initiatives will focus on continued improvements to our customers’ experience, through data driven decisions, remaining human centred and staying connected, coordinated and committed as we navigate the continually changing AI landscape. ### 1. Purpose of AI use DHA will continue to investigate how AI can be used to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and support the effective delivery of housing solutions to Defence personnel and their families. AI systems will be designed to complement human decision-making, ensuring better outcomes for our stakeholders. **Usage patterns** In line with the DTA classification system, DHA's AI use falls primarily within: - workplace productivity - analytics for insights. These uses support internal corporate and enabling functions such as information management, reporting and operational analysis. DHA does not currently use AI for automated decision‑making or administrative action without human oversight. **Domains** DHA’s AI use applies to the following domain: - corporate and enabling. AI is used internally to support functions such as ICT, communications and data analysis. It is not used for direct public service delivery or regulatory decision‑making. ### **2. Transparency and communication** DHA strives to ensure that our stakeholders are fully informed about the role of AI in our processes. At present, DHA does not use AI in decision‑making processes. If this changes in the future, we will clearly communicate when AI is used in a way that could reasonably be expected to significantly affect the rights or interests of DHA’s employees, customers, partners, or the broader community. ### **3. Ethical use of AI** DHA is committed to the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies. We will adhere to strict ethical principles that emphasise fairness, non-discrimination, and the avoidance of bias in all AI-driven activities. We will continuously monitor and audit AI models to ensure they operate in line with these principles. DHA will be guided by the Australian Government’s, "Australia's AI Ethics Principles". ### **4. Privacy and data protection** The use of AI at DHA will comply with Australian privacy laws and regulations. DHA takes the protection of personal information seriously and will ensure that AI systems are designed with privacy and personal information security at their core. DHA has blocked DeepSeek AI to meet the Department of Home Affairs Protective Security Policy Framework compliance. ### **5. Accountability and oversight** DHA will be guided by the Digital Transformation Agency Policy for responsible use of AI in government and the National framework for the assurance of AI in government. In addition, DHA will classify AI use according to [DTA's Classification System(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). DHA will maintain robust oversight of all AI systems, ensuring that there is a clear line of accountability and decisions made by AI. Risk based monitoring and reporting will be applied to DHA’s AI applications. ### **6. Stakeholder engagement and feedback** DHA recognises the importance of ongoing dialogue with our stakeholders, including defence personnel, their families, and the wider community. DHA will provide accessible channels for feedback on the use of AI technologies and will take appropriate action to address concerns or suggestions. ### **7. Continuous improvement** DHA is committed to continually improving our AI practices by investing in new technologies, training, and partnerships. DHA will adapt to emerging trends and best practices in using AI to ensure our systems remain transparent, effective, and aligned with our strategic objectives. By following these principles, DHA will ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and transparently, fostering trust and accountability with all stakeholders.NOPSEMA rewrites its statement, naming the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official and Microsoft Copilot as a tool, while dropping its annual review commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief Information Officer named as Accountable Official for AI oversight and risk management
- Removed: commitment to review the statement annually or on significant change
- Names Microsoft Copilot as a current tool, managed under existing ICT, security and risk frameworks
- Adds a risk-based approach with stronger controls for higher-risk uses
The words that changed
Print ### Menu # AI transparency statementAtNOPSEMA, we are excited tois exploreing thepotentialuse of artificial intelligence (AI) toenhancimprove workplace productivityin a way that keeps humans at the centre of our, while ensuring that people remain accountable for all decisionmakings. We arepledgcommitted todousingthisAI in a safe, secure,and ethicalfashionmanner. ### CurrentAI usage Our AI usage is focused on enhancinguse of AI NOPSEMA currently uses AI to support internal corporate and enabling functionsby way of AI tools such aonly. This includes: - meeting transcription andautomateddocument summarisation - virtual assistants,thato streamline workflows and improve efficiency -deepdata analysis,that helps us understand botho assist with interpreting structured and unstructuredmaterialinformation. NOPSEMA does notcurrently use AI in service delivery - specifically AI is not useduse AI in regulatory service delivery, including compliance, auditing or decision-makingwithout having. Where AI is used, a human-in-the-loop. This means that while AI technologies may be used to assist in various tasks, any finaapproach applies. AI may assist with tasks, but all decisionsorand actions are made bya humanNOPSEMA staff. ### FutureAI adoption Should we decide to extend our AI usage, or implementuse of AI If NOPSEMA expands its use of AI, or introduces any publicies, we will update this statement to reflect this, includingy, this statement will be updated to describe: -ourthe purpose andobjectives behind adopting AIintended outcomes of the AI use - any direct interactions the public may have with AI systems -measures tohow AI systems are monitoranded, evaluatethe effectiveness of AI systemsd and reviewed - compliance with relevant legislation, policies and regulations - efforts to mitigateory obligations - how risks anyd potential negative impactsof AIare identified and mitigated. ### Governance and policy NOPSEMAisaligned tos with the [Australian Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) andwe areis committed tokeeping our stakeholders informed about our AI initiatives. - We are developing an internal AI usage policy that conforms to government guidelines and best practices. - This AI transparency statement will be reviewed annually, or whenever significant changes occur in our approach to AI. - All staff will receive training on the responsible use of AI. ### Contact informationtransparent and responsible AI use. Oversight of AI at NOPSEMA is provided through existing governance arrangements, with the Chief Information Officer acting as the Accountable Official responsible for AI oversight and risk management. NOPSEMA's approach to AI governance includes: - applying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight - developing an internal AI usage policy aligned with whole-of-government requirements - managing current AI tools, such as Microsoft Copilot, through existing ICT, information security and risk management frameworks - providing all staff with access to training on the responsible and ethical use of AI. For any inquiries regarding this statement,or our AI initiativesn NOPSEMA's use of AI, please contact [ai@nopsema.gov.au.](mailto:ai@nopsema.gov.au).MoAD adds a commitment that no AI service directly involves the public without human oversight, plus a DTA classification section and reworked data quality controls.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitment: no AI used where the public directly interacts with it or is significantly impacted without human oversight
- New 'Classification of AI use' section citing DTA usage patterns (workplace productivity, analytics and reporting) and corporate/enabling domain
- Quality controls reworded: adds periodic reviews, audits and performance evaluation, plus escalation thresholds and human review
- Removed: wording that all AI use is subject to strict change and risk management, and that risks are reviewed periodically against agency risk tolerance
The words that changed
… igeon-holes6.jpg.webp?itok=z6k4iJIR) # AI Transparency Statement ## **Introduction** The Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House (MoAD) is … terms are included in the 'definitions' section of this document. ## **How we use AI** - MoAD uses AI in some of its Corporate and Enabling works. This inc … Generative AI is not used to alter historical digital assets/records MoAD **does not** currently use AI in any services where members of the public directly interact with AI systems or are significantly impacted by AI outputs without human oversight. ## **Why we use AI** AI is not widely used across MoAD systems, however MoAD recognises t … k; and - the data governance and compliance requirements are met. ## **How we ensure quality and safety of data** MoAD manages the quality and safety of data through the following controls: -All use of AI at MoAD is subject to strict change and risk management processes to monitor impacts of change and new featurPeriodic reviews, audits, performance evaluation to monitor effectiveness of AI use cases;. -risks are reviewed periodically with seThorough robust risk and change management processes, inplace in the occurrence that a risk elevates above our agency risk tolerance;cluding escalation thresholds and human review. - MoAD has additional backups and audit arrangements in place to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of our data;. -sStaff undertake mandatory training upon induction, with annual refresher training to ensurethey complycompliance with quality and safety requirements of MoAD's AI policy; and. -tThe AI policy aligns with the [AI in government policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## **Classification of AI use** MoAD’s use of AI is classified under the DTA’s AI classification system as follows: - **Usage patterns:** improving workplace productivity, supporting analytics and reporting - **Domains:** corporate and enabling functions ## **Government policy alignment** The content on this page aligns with the Digital Transformation Agen … everage AI opportunities while ensuring its safe and ethical use. ## **Statement review process** This statement will be reviewed annually, or when MoAD makes a signi … ts approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement. ## **Contact** If you have any questions about MoAD's use of AI, please get in touch using our [contact form](https://www.moadoph.gov.au/about/contact). ## **Definitions:learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. **Contact and data matching** – refers to the process of identifying and linking records that repre … that information is accurate, consistent, and free from duplicates. **Corporate and enabling** – to enhance functions by automating processes, optimising resource a … patterns within records to ensure adherence to laws and regulations. **Generative AI** – a type of AI that can create new content, such as text, images, videos, music, and code ## You may also be interested in...  ### [Collection and heritage](https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/collection/collection-and-heritage) We are a living museum of Australi2021-0731_1.jpg.webp?h=6d0d811d&itok=nn84wyHm) ### [Board of Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/board-old-parliament-house) The Board directs the objectives, strategies and political and social history.  ### [Partnerships](https://moadoph.gov.au/support/partnerships) We offer unique and rewarding opportun6/Statement-Jack-Green%27s-paintings-exhibition-MoAD-policies-and-plans.jpg.webp?h=148e76d6&itok=XaMpGeip) ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting.  Driven by an inquiry approach and critical reflection, we empower young people to become active citizens.  The APS Census reports reflect how staff feel about working at MoAD.  ### [Reports, policies and plans](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/reports-policies-and-plans) Find our strategic and corporate plans, policies and reporting2/highres-231129-moad-btl-295687.jpg.webp?h=2bc16611&itok=BW-8H-5Z) ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots.  Plan your next event at Old Parliament House.  ### [Media](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/media) Find our latest media releases, download publicity images and request interviews and film shoots1/Old-Parliament-House-1927-Mildenhall-9716d362.jpg.webp?h=fa47d53b&itok=JqoYggg9) ### [About Old Parliament House](https://moadoph.gov.au/about/old-parliament-house) Old Parliament House was the home of Australia’s federal government from 1927 to 1988.Annual update confirming AI coding, design and testing tools are now in use in IT, promising a Chief AI Officer by July 2026 and citing the APS AI Plan.
read by Claude Opus 5- AI-based coding, design and testing automation tools now in use in IT (previously a testing tool merely 'under consideration')
- Commits to appointing a Chief AI Officer by July 2026
- Adds alignment with the APS AI Plan alongside the Policy
- Statement date moved from 1 April 2025 to 7 April 2026
The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement17 April 20256 The Federal Court of Australia Listed Entity1 (the Entity) is commit … to the safe, ethical and responsible use of AI in accordance with the_[AI Plan for the Australian Public Service](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) (the Plan) and the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)_(the Policy). Our AI use is planned, undertaken and monitored in acco … _ (Cth)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), the_[Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/)_,_[Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publica … ficial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles)_, and the Entity's own policies relating to privacy, data and information technology. As required by the Plan, a Chief AI Officer will be appointed by July 2026. TwoaAccountableoOfficials are nominated under the Policy and have responsibility for: … of these tools can increase productivity and efficiency. Separately,the use of an AI-based testing automation tool is under consideration forAI-based coding, design and testing automation tools are used within our Information Technology section. If adopted, the tool will improve the reliability, maintainto improve the efficiency, reliability, and scalability ofweb application testingbusiness-as-usual tasks. According to the classification system for AI use, the Entity's AI … l activity. ## Governance and risk management The Entity has issued internal policy guidance with the aim of addressing inherent risks associated w … ect the confidentiality of data. Under the guidance of the nominatedaAccountableoOfficials, regular Entity-wide communication and training will ensure a … ive impact of the Entity's use of AI. This statement was prepared on17 April 20256. In accordance with the Policy, it will be updated at least annually …Rewrites the statement, promising a Chief AI Officer by July 2026, adding mandatory AI training and national AI plan alignment, and noting a March 2026 update.
read by Claude Opus 5- Commits to appointing a Chief AI Officer by July 2026 to lead AI transformation
- Adds mandatory APSC 'AI in Government Fundamentals' course plus internal training as a prerequisite for using AI tools
- Public-interaction commitment softened to 'does not currently' use AI interacting with the public or deciding on individuals without human oversight
- New commitment that AI use be responsible, environmentally considerate and in the public interest
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The CGC follows the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) which provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officialsility), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/list-of-transparency-statements). This page provides details of the CGC’s implementation of these policy requirements.### Accountable Officials The CGC has designated the Chief Operating Officer as the accountable official for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the agency. ### Intentions Behind AI AdoptionThe CGC’s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies), the [National AI Plan(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [APS AI Plan 2025(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). ### Key roles The CGC has designated the Chief Operating Officer as the accountable official for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the agency. Accountable Officials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at the CGC. ### AI Adoption The CGC's endorsed AI applications are used internally to support workplace productivity, … ocesses, and increase operational efficiency. ### Public Interactionwith AI The CGC does notand impact The CGC is committed to ensuring that its use of AI in ways that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. ### Monitoring Effectiveness We have established robust processes, including regular reviews, audits, and staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. These operate in tandem with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards and common procedures ins responsible, environmentally considerate, and in the public interest. The CGC does not currently use any AI systems that directly interact with the public or make decisions that affect individuals without human oversight. ### Governance Appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the CGC. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff and is mandatory under the APS AI plan. As a prerequisite to utilising AI tools, staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. The CGC complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM).### Training and Governance Impacted staff will have access to training that aligns with the responsible and acceptable use of AI policies, and appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the CGC. ### Protecting Against Negative Impacts We have established robust processes and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. Our efforts are aligned with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards, and common procedures as outlined in the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). The use of publicly available AI services is governed by the Department of Treasury'sThe CGC have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. The use of AI is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policyand, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy).### Compliance with Legislation The CGC complies with all applicable legislation and regulations. We are committed to maintaining transparency and accountability in our AI practices through the AI Transparency Statement.### Update Frequency This transparency statement is reviewed and updated annually or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was made in March 2026. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Operating Officer at …ACIAR rewrites its statement for policy v2.0, adding privacy, ethics, contact and annual-review sections while dropping its detailed staff AI usage rules and risk discussion.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: detailed staff rules — no official information into public AI services, executive approval for commercial tools, bans on AI accessing restricted information or assessing staff performance, and mandatory reporting of misuse
- Removed: commitment to clearly indicate administrative decisions aided by AI, and the risk-assessment/approval requirement for automated decision-making tools
- Removed: discussion of bias, false information and privacy risks, plus audits and algorithmic accountability commitments
- Adds commitment that AI systems make no automated decisions affecting the public, funding recipients or program beneficiaries
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement ##Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) simulates human intelligence processes and can enhance functionality in standalone applications or alongside existing ones.Introduction ACIAR’s commitment to the safe, ethical, responsible and legal use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia, through international agricultural research partnerships. ACIAR uses the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition](https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html) of AI, as ‘a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ ## Background While AI offers numerous opportunities, it also introduces new risks t … ul management. This Statement outlines our approach to AI use within ACIAR, in accordance with the DTA's [pustralian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), in accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsibleAIuse of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government 2.0](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). This policy applies to all ACIAR staff, contractors and service providers, noting AI is not used for decision-making purposes at ACIAR. ## Policy AI technologies will be adopted only after a thorough risk assessment and monitored for compliance. Official information must not be entered into public AI services unless already public. Email accounts cannot be used with public AI services without approval. Commercial AI tools require executive approval, and any AI-produced content must be reviewed before publication. Automated decision-making tools need significant risk assessai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability), setting a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. This policy applies to all ACIAR staff, contractors and service providers and also aligns with the [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Staff guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai). ## Our Approach to AI Adoption Currently, ACIAR primarily employs Microsoft Copilot as its enterprise AI tool. It assists staff by drafting and summarising documents, and approval. AI tools must not access restricted information, perform illegal activities, or assess staff performance. Misuse or risks identified must be reported immediately. Administrative decisions aided by AI will be clearly indicated. ## AI applicaalysing substantial volumes of text-based information, improving search capabilities and knowledge discovery, and supporting various administrative and corporate functions.Currently, ACIAR primarily employs Microsoft's Copilot as its AI tool. Copilot facilitates staff in various activities by leveraging AI capabilitieACIAR’s current AI use falls into the followingways: - **Automation and Efficiency -** Copilot automatescategories: - **Efficiency Through Automation** : Copilot helps streamline repetitive tasks, such as meeting transcriptions,minunote-taking,email searchingand datasorting, thereby enabling staff to concentrate on more complex and value-added aganisation, increasing efficiency and productivitiesy. - **OffiEnhanced Productivity-** : Copilotenhances textual interpretation and geneassists with draftion by understanding and responding in natural language. This includesng, document structuringdocum, and contents,summarising written material and assisting with drafting contentation, creating a more efficient and effective workflow. - **Collaboration-** : Copilotaids insupports real-timecollaboration by providing suggestions and insights during document creation, ensuring consistency and improving the overall quality of the work produced. By utilising Copilot, ACIAR aims to enhance operational efficiency, improve productivity and support collaborative efforts, while maintaining a high standard of quality and accuracy. ## Monitoring and governance Bias cteamwork, providing insights and suggestions that promote consistency and quality across projects. We maintain a culture of responsible AI use through regular staff communications and ongoing training. AI systems used by ACIAR do not make automated decisions that directly affect the public, funding recipients or program beneficiaries. ## Governance, Risk Management and Assurance ACIAR uses DTA’s [AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) to review the impact of AI use. In governing the use of AI, ACIAR also adheres to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as the DTA's: - [Technical stanise from data selection or software models, leading to skewed results. AI might produce false information and/or result with privacy risks. It may also provide outdated or inaccurate data and could diminish individual creativity, resulting in homogenised content. Monitoring and governance of AI systems are crucial to mitigate the risks associated with bias, false information and privacy concerns. Establishing robust frameworks that include continuous monitoring, regular audits and compliance with establishedd for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/AI-technical-standard) - [AI Impact Assessment Tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) - [Guidance on AI procurement in government](https://www.buyict.gov.au/public/en/buyers?id=public_content_navigation&topic_id=09f5d0e81b762a50f421db96b04bcb94) - [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve) - Other applicable internal policies and governance frameworks. ## Privacy and Security ACIAR complies with all applicable laws, including the Privacy Act 1988. Personal information is minimised, anonymised, and protected with strong security measures. Security considerations in relation to the use of AI are consistent with relevant cyber security strategies, including [Essential Eight](https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/asds-cyber-security-frameworks/essential-eight) strategies to mitigating cyber security incidents, the updated [Protective Security Policy Framework](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/), and relevant policiescanhelp ensure the ethical and responsible use of AI. Transparency in data sources, algorithmic accountability and stakeholder involvement are key components of effective governance. By implementing these measures, we can foster trust and integrity in AI applicd legislations of impacted jurisdictions. All AI-generated outputs are reviewed by ACIAR staff before being used in official documents, communications, or decisions. AI tools are used to support staff productivity and do not replace human judgement. ACIAR staff remain responsible for all final decisions and advice. ## Ethical and Legal Compliance ACIAR’s AI practices reflect Australia’s eight AI Ethics Principles and adhere to all relevant laws and regulations,ensurincluding they deliver accurate, reliable and fair outcomes. ACIAR acknowledges the rapid evolution of AI technology and commits to continuous monitoring to ensure that policies, tools and their usage remain current. Internal governance mechanisms will be employed toPublic Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and the Australian Public Service Code of Conduct. Our commitment to fairness, transparency and accountability underpins all governance overseethe usedevelopments. ## Compliance We will use the DTA’s [AI assurance frameworkof AI at ACIAR. ## Contact For more information on AI use at ACIAR, please [contact us](https://www.digitalaciar.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) to review the impact of AI on ACIAR’s strategic footprint. ACIAR will also adhere to any relevant legislation and regulations governing AI across Commonwealth agencies, such as the DTA's [policy for responsible AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)form/contact-us?__cf_chl_tk=rtzp3EzVzOGvTQJ1zurnQ9WboFZpeMff0A4ij.IwtdI-1773285403-1.0.1.1-ZxD_d3yobBDllExQ2f1MSpNu01dtBlJN6V9z9R.iWrE). ## Review and updates The first version of this Statement was published in March 2025, followed by an annual update published in March 2026. This Statement will be reviewed annually, or when there are significant changes to ACIAR’s use of AI technologies. [ ACIAR Statement on the Responsible Use of AI.pdf 723367.39KB - pdf ](https://www.aciar.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-043/ACIAR%20-Statement%20on%20the%20Responsible%20Use%20of%20-on-the-Responsible-Use-of-AI.pdf) [Accountability](https://www.aciar.gov.au/search?search_api_f …- Bureau of Meteorologyfirst tracked
Discloses a new opt-in AI recruitment trial with human-only selection decisions, and reports its AI Risk Appetite Guidelines are now finalised.
read by Claude Opus 5- New section discloses limited, opt-in trial of AI in recruitment, with results to be reviewed after the process
- Commits that AI does not make selection decisions; shortlisting and selection remain with a human panel under APS merit principles
- AI Risk Appetite Guidelines now finalised rather than a future commitment
- Last-updated date moved from February 2026 to April 2026
The words that changed
… AI, we use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD)](https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html) (OECD) definition: > "A machine-based system that, for explicit or implici … delivery of innovative and expert advice to the Australian Government, grounded in evidence and science. We classify our use of AI and rela … individual responsibilities when accessing publicly available tools. ### AI in recruitment trial We are undertaking a limited, opt-in trial of AI in recruitment. AI will be used to support comparison and evaluation of recruitment processes, alongside standard human assessment for this process. We do not use AI to make selection decisions about candidates. All decisions to shortlist, assess or select candidates are made by a human selection panel, consistent with APS merit based recruitment principles. Results and outcomes of the trial will be explored once the recruitment process is completed. We continue exploring applications of AI to support our vision, purpos … management, the administration of legislation and regulation. We will continue to update this statement asourits use of AI changes. ## Public interaction and impact We are committe … r. When completing the register, business owners ensure AI solutionsareis implemented safely and responsibly. This includes completing risk ass … .gov.au/sp?id=buyer&kb=KB0011755). To support AI risk mitigation, wewillhave finalised our AI Risk Appetite Guidelines which sit alongside tools supporting … sparency Statement review and updates We last updated this statementFebruaryin April 2026. We will review and update it if our approach to or use of AI changes, and at least every 12 months, in line with policy requirements.Only page furniture changed: breadcrumbs, heading and share/print widgets dropped, an "On this page" label added, and a link rendered properly.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
- [Home](https://www.asqa.gov.au/) - [About us](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us) - [Reporting and accountability](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability) - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency StatementThe Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) is committed to ensurin … icable Commonwealth laws and policies, such as requirements under the\[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policyfor the responsible use of AI in%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20governmentShare \_\_\_\_\_\_[\_\_](mailto:?subject=ASQA%20website&body= "Social link email") \_\_PrintOn this pageThe Tribunal names its Chief Data and AI Officer as Chief AI Officer under the policy, alongside the existing accountable official.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer role disclosed: the Chief Data and AI Officer (CDAIO)
- CDAIO joins the CIO in engaging the Senior Management Committee and Principal Registrar/CEO on AI approvals
The words that changed
… ficial under the policy is the Chief Information Officer (CIO). - TheCTribunal's Chief AI Officer under the policy is the Chief Data and AI Officer (CDAIO). - The CIO and CDAIO engageswith the Senior Management Committee and Principal Registrar/CEO unde … gement Framework overseen by the Tribunal Audit and Risk Committee. -tThe Senior Management Committee is actively involved when reviewing any …Fixes punctuation in a sentence about staff use of AI, adding a missing comma and "and"; no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… work, support the processing of large volumes of data and information, and reduce time spent on routine tasks. Staff must review outputs for qua …Rewrites the statement: new Accountable Officer, a Chief AI Officer promised by June 2026, mandatory staff training, but drops the detailed use-case table and no-public-chatbot commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer to be in place by June 2026
- Accountable Officer Matthew Johnston replaces Hamish McDonald (Kerryn Kovacevic retained)
- Removed: commitment that the public will not interact with a chatbot or similar agent
- Removed: detailed table of AI uses (stakeholder communication sorting, helpdesk case triage, policy and legal review)
The words that changed
… ReadSpeaker") # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency StatementTLearn how thedDepartment of Education usesAartificialIintelligence(AI) in asafely and responsible and transparent way that upholds citizens’ personal privacy and rights and assesses the value of AI uses in an ethical and transparent manner, while keeping people at the centre of how we work. We aim to use AI within the department in ways that improve operational efficiency and assist the department in meeting its mission to ensure access to quality education for all Australians. ## On this page: ## Why and how does the department use Ay to improve services, inform policy, and support quality education. ## On this page: The Department of Education recognises the opportunities artificialIintelligence (AI)? Currently, the primary use of AI within the departmpresentis through the Microsoft Copilot tool that is available in Microsoft digital products. Key examples of what this means in practice are: Productivity and Enabling| Information Analytics and Insight| Policy and Legal\ ---|---|--- - Sorting high volumes of stakeholder communication - Improving search and sorting processes related to file management | - Assisting helpdesks roles to sort through large amounts of case information - Organising large volumes of held information related to educational institutions | - Using AI to review information around policies relevant to the department's core focuses - Using AI to assist with legal review where large amounts of case materials exist ## Governance, management, and transparency We are foco transform the way we work and how we deliver our services. We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently to support our mission to ensure all Australians can access quality education. Our use of AI is considered and purposeful. We are maturing our understanding and use through trialling and experimentation to better inform our policy development, unlock internal efficiencies and uplift our capabilities. Our usedon establf AI ishing an AI governance regime that ensures AI serves our strategic objectives and those of the government. We have appointed accountable officials for AI and we are establishing appropriate review structures for new uses of AI. These will monitor use cases to ensure ethical uses of AI and alignment of AI and data governance to ensure that the way collected data is used by AI tools does not differ from stated collection purposes. The department also maintains clear communication with its IT partner provider, the Department of Employment and Workplace Relformed by and aligned with the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service and the Policy for Responsible use of AI in Government. The department is developing its own AI Strategy and Roadmap for the coming 12 – 18 month period. We also have our own internal AI Guidelines to help staff understand their responsibilities and obligations when using AI in the workplace. ## AI Accountable Officer and Chief AI Officer The Department of Education’s(DEWR) to ensure thatuse of AIgis overnance and approaches are aligned. The use of AI in the department is periodically re-examined and reviewed in the Department’s Audit and Risk committee. In extraordinary circumstanceseen by our AI Accountable Officers. The AI Accountable Officers: - are the primary contacts forif there are rapidly emerging risks around AI deployment, committee members can require out-of-session reviews or an extraordinary session of the committee to deal with these risks. In addition to monitoring developing AI risks, the Audit and Risk committee and the department’s Digital Services team will ensure that the use of AI within the department is effective, measurable and sustained and complies with all relevant government cybersecurity standards. The departwhole‑of‑government AI assurance and coordination, and keep staff informed of AI policy obligations and changes. - are accountable for implementing AI policy within the agency, including governance frameworks, transparency statementis also developing an AI use case register, as recommended by the Commonwealth [Policy for the Responsible use of AI](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/policy/responsible-use-of-ai-in-government). The department has appointed two Accountable Officers for the use of AI. Theynd internal registers - oversee AI risk assessments and ensure appropriate controls are in place, The departments AI Accountable Officers are:**- Kerryn Kovacevic, Chief Information Officer** **Hamish McDonald,** **- Matthew Johnston, First Assistant Secretary, Strategy, Data and Measurement**The departmentwill periodically review other measures, including these governance arrangements and this transparency statement, to ensure that the department remains compliant with all requirements for the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai). ## What we won’t use AI for The department currently does not allow AI for fully automated outpus Chief AI Officer is responsible for driving value, adoption and cultural change through AI. The departments Chief AI Officer will be in place by June 2026. ## Governance and transparency The department is maturing its AI governance arrangements. Existing governance arrangements such as the departments Audit and Risk Committee receive regular updates and review of AI usage, tooling, training and compliance. The departments AI Transparency Statement and internal AI guidance are regularly reviewed and updated to reflect procgresses, interaction with the public or in conjunction with other automated decisionor changes and comply with Australian Government policy. The department making (ADM) programs. This means that AI outputs will be reviewed by a staff member with the experience to know if outputs are appropriate (i.e. human-in-the-loop), the public will not interact with a chatbot or similar agent when contacting us, and automated decision making will not be combined witains an AI use case register and has clear guidance on approved tools and record keeping requirements in line with the Archives Act 1983. The department has approved the use of Microsoft Copilot and made Copilot Chat available to all staff. All staff are required to complete the ADM programs which are already understood as potentially higher risk to the public due to large scale or high volume of output. ## Compliance with relevant laws and regulations While enabling the use of AI as part of a general strategy to promote innovation in ways of working, the department acts in line with all relevant pieces of legislation and regulation that govern the information that it manages and appropriate uses of that information. This includes: - the [Privacy Act (1988)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/2019-08-13/text) - [Public Governance, PerformanceI in Government Fundamentals training developed by the Australian Public Service Commission every 12 months. ## Why and how does the department use Artificial Intelligence (AI)? The Department of Education is primarily using AI to improve internal efficiency. Staff are encouraged to use AI to draft, summarise and refine their work, support the processing of large volumes of data and information reduce time spent on routine tasks. Staff must review outputs for quality andAaccountability Act (2013)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00123/latest/text) - [Australian Public Service Code of Conduct](https://www.apsc.gov.au/publication/aps-values-and-code-conduct-practice) - [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/policy/responsible-use-of-ai-in-government) This transparency statement will be annually reviewed and re-released with relevant updatesuracy. To minimise risk and safeguard the public, the Department of Education **does not** use AI for automated decision-making. All decisions **are made by staff** , ensuring human oversight and accountability. ## Review and Updates This statement is reviewed annually, or sooner if there are significant changes to how the Department uses AI. ## Contact Information For inquiries regarding the department’s use of AI,please[contact[digitalservices@education.gov.au](mailto:digitalservices@education.gov.auus](https://www.education.gov.au/about-department/contact-us#toc-online-contact-form).Updates the statement's publication date from 27 February 2025 to 10 April 2026, with no change to the content or commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… # Review and updates This AI Transparency Statement was published on27 February10 April 20256 and will be reviewed and updated annually and/or when significant cha …Swaps the framework its own AI adoption follows, from the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.
read by Claude Opus 5- Now aligns its AI adoption to the Guidance for AI Adoption (6 essential practices)
- Removed: adherence to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard and its 10 guardrails
- Softens wording from 'adheres to' to 'aligns to', and from what deployers 'must do' to transparency and accountability 'practices'
- Last updated date moved to 7 April 2026
The words that changed
# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated:26 February7 April 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebo … nd responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adhereligns to theVoluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrailGuidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountabilityrequirements and explain whatpractices for developers and deployers of AI systemsmust do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use …AFSA expands the page heading to spell out "Artificial Intelligence (AI)", with no change to the statement's content.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AIrtificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency policy for …- Parliamentary Workplace Support Servicefirst tracked
- Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authorityfirst tracked
The words that changed
… (mailto:tads.helpdesk@gbrmpa.gov.au). ### AI Transparency StatementThe Reef Authority's AI Transparency Statement was last updated in November 2025. In line with the \[Policy for responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI in government v1.1.pdf) this AI Transparency Statement will be updated if the Reef Authority's approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months.Created Tue, 2025-02-25 11:21 Updated 20 Nov 2025The words that changed
# AI transparency statementPage last updated:3 March 2025[Home](https://www.ga.gov.au/home) [Geoscience Australia](https://www. …No change to the statement itself; the capture simply drops the site's feedback form, contact links and last-updated stamp.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… we make a significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above.Last updated: 3 February 2026 You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. ## How useful was this page?\* Star rating Do you have any comments? Note: your comments are anonymous. We use them to improve the website. Do not include any personal details.\ [Contact us](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us) or [find legal help](https://www.fwc.gov.au/simple-page/where-find-legal-help) if you need a response.- Federal Court of Australiafirst tracked
The words that changed
… alservices@education.gov.au](mailto:digitalservices@education.gov.au).**This statement was last updated 30/09/2025.**The words that changed
… nquiries-and-feedback). DSS3370 | Permalink: www.dss.gov.au/node/3370Last modified 20 January 2026.Only page furniture changed: a contact image and the site's "help us improve" feedback form no longer appear in the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… he Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official.### [ AI team ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-team?language=en … the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/about-the-department)**Is there anything wrong with this page?** ## Help us improve health.gov.au If you would like a response please provide an email address. Your email address is covered by our [privacy policy](https://www.health.gov.au/node/6186). Email address What you were doing? (mandatory) What went wrong? (mandatory) Leave this field blank- Defence Housing Australiafirst tracked
The words that changed
Skip to page navigation # Artificial Intelligence Transparency StatementLast updated: 19 February 2026This page explains how we are using Artificial Intelligence, in line w …No change by Comcare: the capture merely drops navigation and share chrome, alters apostrophe characters, and shows the review date as a relative "20 days ago".
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Share this page: Share to Print Print \[Share to Email Email \](mailto:?subject=Comcare%20|%20Information%20on%20AI Transparency Statement&body=Visit%20Comcare%20to%20find%20about%20AI%20Transparency%20Statement%20-%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.comcare.gov.au%2Fabout%2Fforms-pubs%2Fdocs%2Fpubs%2Fcorporate-publications%2Fai-transparency-statement) [Corporate publications](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications) - [Annual Report 2018–19 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-18-19-portal) - [Annual Report 2019–20 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-19-20-portal) - [Annual Report 2020–21 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-2020-21-portal) - [Annual Report 2023-24 (Transparency Portal Publication)](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/annual-report-2023-24-transparency-portal-publication) - [Overpayments (Claims) – Guiding principles](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/overpayments-policy) - [AI Transparency Statement](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/ai-transparency-statement) - [Cybersecurity Strategy](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications/cyber-security-strategy)# AI Transparency Statement _________________________________________ … ______________ Comcare acknowledges the Digital Transformation Agency’'s [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in g … ty, privacy, and risk management frameworks - alignment with Australia’'s Voluntary AI Safety Standard and AI Ethics Principles - mandatory st … in February 2025 and will be reviewed annually, or earlier if Comcare’'s adoption of AI changes. ## Contact us Comcare’'s Chief Information Office is designated as the accountable official u … /about/contact/contact-us) page of this website. Page last reviewed:04 September 2025 You might also be interested in**20 days ago**Only a page search widget disappeared from the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to content or footerSearch search## How Austrade defines AI In Austrade we apply the OECD definition o …The words that changed
… te attempts at commercial engagement via this account will be ignored.Date last updated: 2 January 2026.The words that changed
… r email [help@digitalhealth.gov.au](mailto:help@digitalhealth.gov.au).Date last updated: 28 February 2025No change to the statement itself; only a stray "Search ABS" page element dropped from the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Search ABS[Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transpa …Discloses a licensed ChatGPT rollout to research staff, makes AI training mandatory before tool access, tightens disclosure rules and adds a version history.
read by Claude Opus 5- New tool disclosed: licensed ChatGPT for a number of staff, mainly in research areas
- Training in appropriate AI use now a prerequisite for tool access
- Users must describe AI purposes and confirm review of outputs when submitting work for approval
- Version history table added; statement updated 2 April 2026 to align with updated DTA policy
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statementReleasUpdated 024/ 024 / 20256 This statement is published in accordance with requirements set out … tion relevant to government’s use of AI including those relating to:- the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct- data governance - privacy - cyber security - the APS Values and Code of Conduct. ## How we use AI In accordance with the [_DTA Classification syste … to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or intervention. In 2024,we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We continue to make this available to all staff.do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or interventionhave also made a licensed version of ChatGPT available to a number of staff, primarily in research focussed areas. ## Governance processes We maintain an internal policy on the use … nd used in our Data Technology (DT) environment. It also requires all AI users to be open and transparent about their use of AIand to carefully review all outputs for accuracy and quality. When submitting work for review or approval, users must, where applicable, describe the purpose(s) for which AI tools were used and confirm that all AI generated outputs relied upon have been carefully reviewed for accuracy, quality and appropriateness. Completion of training in the appropriate use of AI is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC. ## Compliance We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legi … e use of AI changes significantly, and at least every twelve months. ## Version history **Date********Note****** 24 February 2025 Initial version 31 March 2026 Review and amended to align with updated DTA policy ## Contact us If you have any questions about this statement please contact [ai@pc.gov.au](mailto:ai@pc.gov.au).DVA now says it has appointed a Chief AI Officer, replacing its earlier note that the designation was being formalised.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer now appointed (previously 'being formalised')
- Last updated date moved to 2 April 2026
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated12 April 2026 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Gover … ernment and has designated an AI Accountable Official (October 2024).The designation ofDVA has appointed a Chief AI Officeris currently being formalised. For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our …ARPANSA rewrites its statement, mapping AI use to the DTA classification, naming new governance bodies and mandatory training, and swapping its AI email for a web form.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adopts DTA use-classification categories (workplace productivity, analytics, decision support, innovation) and 'Corporate and Enabling' domain
- Adds governance bodies: AI Governance Working Group, communities of practice/internal specialists, CIO and CISO oversight
- Names mandatory 'AI Fundamentals' training for all staff accessing AI tools
- Adds commitment to review the statement at least annually; dates it March 2026
The words that changed
… autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## Introduction ARPANSAis committed to theworks to protection ofAustralia, the health and safety of its people,ns and the environment from the harmful effects of radiation. Delivering on our role includes the responsiblby promoting safe, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence(AI) to enhance our research, services and operations. The agency recognises this is a rapidly evolving technology; this statement covers our approach and consideration of AI and how we will go about ensuring its safe and responsible use. We are committed to adapting our use and capabilities as the technology, environment and policy requirements evolve. ## Purpose of AI use AI may be used across various corporate and enabling functions to enhance workplace productivity by streamlining workflows, automating routine tasks, providing analytics and intelligent data insights. It is used by select staff in their routine digital daily activities and to provide accessibility support. AI may also be used to support service delivery inin its operations. This transparency statement describes ARPANSA’s approach to AI, following DTA guidelines for responsible government use and transparency. ## Why we use AI ARPANSA uses AI to support the delivery of high‑quality scientific advice, internal corporate operations, and regulatory assurance. AI helps staff perform routine or complex tasks more efficiently, enabling grelation to compliance and assurance. ### Workplace productivity We see the potential benefits in using AI to improve workplace productivity for all staff including: - streamlining staff accessibility and understanding of policies and entitlements - improving accessibility to assist staff in using platforms, applications, and services - improving the uptake of features in existing products and services - providing specialised just in time eduer focus on mission‑critical work that protects the community from radiation risks. ## How we use AI ARPANSA’s current use of AI aligns with the [DTA classification system](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification) forstaff - assisting in summarising content such as documents, emails and other content - enabling the transcription and dynamic review of interviews and meeting notes - supporting rapid prototyping of training and education materials for agency staff.AI use in the following ways: ### Usage patterns: - Workplace productivity - Analytics for insights - Decision-support/administrative processes - Innovation and process improvement. ### Domains: - Corporate and Enabling### Public interactionARPANSA’s use of AI does not involveand impact ARPANSA does not use AI in any way that directly interactions withthe public or pose any significant impact to individuals. AI is not used as part of automated decision making with respect to individuals and the agency commits to being clear if AI becomesmembers of the public. No AI system is used to make automated decisions about individuals, or to generate outcomes that could significantly imparctof a decision-making process. ## Monitoring and governance ### Responsible AI usage policy The agency will maintain an internal responsible AI usage policy that aligns with advice and guidance provided by the DTA, Australian Public Service Commission and other relevant agencies for using AI services responsibly. ### Measure and monitorindividuals without human review. ## Monitoring AI effectiveness and impacts ARPANSA monitors AI use and applications to ensure ongoing safety, transparency and ethical operation. ARPANSA continually strengthens its AI governance in concert with our broader cyber security, data, digital and technical governance frameworks to ensure all AI use remains safe, ethical and well‑aligned with whole‑of‑agency risk settings. ARPANSA has established governance and oversight mechanisms to support ethical and effective use of AI including:#### Training The agency will provide all staff with training and education in general AI knowledge and where relevant to specific AI tools as well as on-demand support. Staff complete mandatory training when accessing AI tools and have continued access to training on the proper use of AI services. #### Support The agency will provide internal support and information for staff and managers on the use of AI. All Staff are provided the means to report concerns or queries to the Digital Technology Team through the provision of feedback session, surveys, and service requests. #### Monitoring The agency acknowledges AI carries with it emerging risks and will continue to establish oversight and governance frameworks and processes to monitor the effectiveness, risk and ethical use of our AI systems. ## Compliance Our AI practices will comply with the mandatory requirements of the Australian Government's P- An AI Governance Working Group - Communities of Practice and internal AI specialists - CIO and CISO oversight #### Training and capability All staff who access AI tools must complete the AI Fundamentals mandatory training. We are committed to building staff capability, including digital capability required at all levels of the agency. We offer AI training, education and support and provide opportunities to enable our workforce to develop their skills and knowledge. Training needs will be assessed as ARPANSA’s use of AI evolves. #### Compliance ARPANSA complies with the DTA policies, standards, legislation, privacy and security frameworks. The DTA requirements are regularly reviewed by the AI Working Group and Accountable Official. This statement was last updated in March 2026. In line with the policy forthe[Responsible Use of AI in Government. We ensure that our AI systems are in accordance with all applicable laws and guidelines. This includes regular reviews and audits to maintain compliance with relevant legislation and regulations, and continuous improvement process](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), our statement will be reviewed at least annually and updated if our approach to and use of AI changes. #### Accountable officialARPANSA'sThe Chief Information Officer was designated asthe aARPANSA’s AccountableoOfficial for AI on 11 November 2024. ### AI transparency statement The AI transparency statement was first published to our website on 14 February 2025. ## ARPANSA AI Contact Information For further inquiries about our AI use, please contact us at [ai@arpansa.gov.au](mailto:ai@arpansa.gov.auContact For questions about this statement please submit an enquiry via our [online contact form. ](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/contact-us/contact-us-form) [ rather than being trialled
- Removed: statement that AI is not used to inform decision making; now says AI may support administrative decision-making in grants administration
- Adds image processing as a classified (nil) use category
The words that changed
… ity Act 2013_](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2013A00123/latest/text) (PGPA ACTct), and therefore must comply with all requirements outlined in the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Transparency Statement The ARC is committed toenscapturing that the internal usee opportunity of Artificial Intelligence (AI)is appropriate, responsible and ethical. The ARC embraces the opportunity for all its personnel to use AI as a complementary tool for internal purposes, however the appropriate, responsible and ethical use of AI will always be the highest priority. The ARC complies with the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), and other relevant guidance regarding government standards of AI useacross the organisation, while ensuring that the use of AI is appropriate, responsible and ethical. The ARC complies with the [_Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), and other relevant guidance regarding government standards of AI use. The ARC has a separate policy to outline its expectations for the use of [_AI by grant applicants and ARC assessors_](https://www.arc.gov.au/node/11917 "Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the ARC's grant programs"). To ensure the appropriate, responsible and ethical application of AI used internallywithin the agency, the ARC’s approach is to: - Implement an internal AI acceptable use policy for all personnel to follow. This policy will be reviewed annually (ataminimum) to ensure the ARC continues to align with best practices and government standards and keep pace with developments in AI technology. - Release a strategic position on AI adoption within the organisation to guide and empower ARC personnel to engage with AI through an aligned vision. - Continue to provide mandatory,and develop further,training on AI to all personnel. - Introduce an internal prioritisation process to consider new AI projects to ensure they align with the appropriate, responsible and ethical use of AI. - Maintain a register of AI use cases within the ARC and assign accountable use case owners to monitor and record the internal use of AI within the agency. - Mana … ent Framework, including reporting to the ARC Audit and Risk Committee and Digital Transformation Agency. The ARC’s current use of AI within the agency is in its early stages, with a few applications of AI currently being piloted within some business ar … d potential applications of AI used internally within the ARC (as of 28 February6 March 20256).**Usage1** | **Domain 2** | **| Domain | ARC current or potential use**\ ---|---|---\ **Analytics for insights** Identifies, produces or unde … g tools. | Corporate and Enabling | The use of advanced AI techniquesareis planned for development to inform policydevelopmentsettings and where required, provide insights to the ARC’s stakeholders. Any internally developed models or the use of external models will be considered through the internal prioritisation process, have appropriate evaluation methods applied, and the results will be … .\ **Workplace productivity** Automate routine tasks, manage workflows,and facilitate communication. | Corporate and Enabling | The ARCis trialling the use of Microsoft CoPilot 365 to automateutilises Microsoft CoPilot 365 Enterprise to provide real-time transcription in meetings, summarise key discussion points and assistwithin administrative tasks. For example, composing an initial draft of minutes and action items, with human reviewin advance of human review. The ARC will consider how AI may be used to improve grant administration and assist with coding for internal systems. Any implementation will be consistent with the principles of being appropriate, responsible and ethical, have appropriate risk management practices in place, and ensure there is human oversight.\ **Decision making and administrative action** Support decision maki … e administrative action without human intervention. | Policy and Legal[1]| Theuse of AI to informARC may consider how AI can support administrative decisionand administrative action is not currently applied within the ARC. [[1]](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) As per the DTA’s [_Classification system for AI use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) _._processes in grants administration. Any implementation will be consistent with the principles of being appropriate, responsible and ethical, have appropriate risk management practices in place, and ensure there is human oversight.\ **Image processing** Processes images to automatically identify patterns and objects, such as faces, for official purposes. | Nil | The usage of image processing is not applied within the ARC, nor are there any appropriate applications currently identified for potential use of this technology within the ARC. ### Chief AI Officer Anthony Murfett, Deputy Chief Executive Officer Australian Research Council ### Accountable Official Bobby Almasi, Chief Information Officer Australian Research Council Phone: 02 6206 7226 [**cio@arc.gov.au](mailto:cio@arc.gov.au) ### ARC Communications Phone: 02 6287 6600 [communications@arc.gov.au**](mailto:ciommunications@arc.gov.au) Level 4 West, 47 Bowes Street Phillip ACT 2606 GPO Box 2702, Canberra ACT 2601 This AI transparency statement was first published in April 2025 and updated in March 2026. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when significant change is made to the ARC’s approach to AI.DVA reports its consent-based Claims Document Reader trial has now started rather than being in development, and clarifies what Semantic Text Analysis does.
read by Claude Opus 5- Claims Document Reader proof-of-concept trial has commenced (previously only in development)
- Semantic Text Analysis described as an advanced form of key word matching applied to MyService text responses
- Last updated date moved from 9 February to 1 April 2026
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated9 February1 April 2026 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance … has access to publicly available information - Semantic Text Analysis (an advanced form of key word matching) to interpret unstructured MyService text responses provided by DVA clients when submitting claims, with staff a … or personal data and does not make decisions or recommendations. DVAis developinghas commenced a trial of a voluntary, consent based, Proof of Concept Claims Docume … type document reader has been built by DVA within the GovAI Platform.A proposedThe trialwilluses a clear consent model to ensure trial participants who volunteer to p … ation. The trial will test the suitability of the tool to assist staff in processing claims. The tool does not make decisions or determine claim outcomes. Claims …The Mint adds three AI domains (service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal), notes AI drafts internal documentation, and updates its date of effect to March 2026.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds domains: Service Delivery, Compliance and fraud detection, Policy and legal (previously Corporate and enabling only)
- New disclosure that AI is used for developing internal documentation, including research and drafting
- Date of effect moves from 6 March 2025 to 25 March 2026
- Approver Emily Martin now listed as CEO rather than A/g CEO
The words that changed
CM. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIALdomain of Corporate and enabling, and the ufollowing usage patterns and domains: Usage patternsof• Workplace Productivityand• Image Processing.Domains • Corporate and enabling • Service Delivery • Compliance and fraud detection • Policy and legal In the use of Image Processing, the Mint uses basic shape recognition for identifying humans. The Mint does not identify individuals via facial recognition or any other biometric markers. At this time, the Mint does not use AI in a way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by without human intervention. The Mint’s use of AI is for the development of internal documentation, including research and drafting. As a part of its commitment to responsible use of AI, including ensuring accountability for accuracy and decision making, Mint employees review all AI outputs. This is known as Human-in-the-loop (HITL). The Mint understands the use of AI must be based on Australia’s AI Ethics Principals:• human, societal and environmental wellbeing• human-centered values• fairness• privacy protection and security• reliability and safety• transparency and explainability• contestability• accountability. OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2 The Mint is committed to applying the cyber security requirements outlined in the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM) and the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF), using a risk-based approach to ensure the secure operations of all AI applications. The AI space is evolving, and as such the Mint will continue to monitor and evaluate its current and potential future approach to AI use. The Mint will ensure integration with the whole of government approach to AI adoption, participating in AI forums and processes where applicable. To this end, this statement will be updated as required to describe what AI will be used for, and what it will not be used for.OFFICIAL Royal Australian Mint AI transparency statement Doc. No. D25/8915 OFFICIAL 2This review will be conducted annually, or when there is change to how AI is used at the Mint.625 March 20256 Approved by Emily Martin,A/gCEO Document no. D25/8915 CM container 25/347 Contact Melinda HodgesAUSTRAC tweaks a disclaimer to refer to "certain Australian legislation" rather than "the Act"; the rest is page furniture shifting.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AUSTRAC Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement## On this page - Introduction - How we use AI - Usage patterns and d … rac.gov.au/contact-us/form). This guidance sets out how we interpretthe Actcertain Australian legislation, along with associated Rules and regulations. Australian courts are u … t be taken into account when determining how the law applies to you.Page ID: 1173## Was this page helpful?ASQA narrows its no-AI commitment from all service delivery to public-facing services, adds a governance pledge for future public-facing AI, and drops its review-and-update line.
read by Claude Opus 5- Commitment narrowed: no AI in 'service delivery' becomes no AI in 'public-facing services'
- Removed: statement that it was last updated 28 February 2025 and will be reviewed annually or on significant change
- New commitment to privacy, ethics and security assessments before deploying public-facing AI
- Governance framed as compliance with applicable Commonwealth laws and policies, not just the named policy and PSPF
The words that changed
… erned, monitored and benefits are realised, including compliance witheachapplicable Commonwealth laws and policies, such as requirements under the \[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](http … nsive data analysis. ASQA does not currently employ AI capability inservice deliverypublic-facing services, including our regulatory functions or decision-making processes. Whi … ted by AI systems, in order to maintain accountability and accuracy. As ASQA deploys public-facing AI capability it will ensure its data and AI governance practices include privacy, ethics, and security assessments that aim to protect the public against any negative impacts of AI. In coming years, ASQA plans to leverage AI technologies as part of its … ransformation@asqa.gov.au](mailto:digitaltransformation@asqa.gov.au) ## Review and updatesThis AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 28 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur. Was this page helpful? Yes No Please add your comments: CAPTCHA Leave this field blankShare \_\_\_\_\_\_[\_\_](mailto:?subject=ASQA%20website&body= "Social link email") \_\_PrintThe words that changed
… more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain._ ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing … chieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently sched … xtraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. _Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that ar … d as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis._ ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via … eflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [**AI@ndiscommission.gov.au**](mailto:AI@ndiscommission.gov.au).AFMA adds a comma to its Accountable Official sentence; the rest of the diff is page furniture and a last-updated stamp dropping out.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… d its Chief Information Officer to the role of AI Accountable Official, and they are responsible for implementing the policy within AFMA. ## … our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement._## Did you find what you were looking for? | Page last updated: 28/02/2025TopNIAA replaces its 2025 statement with a 2026 rewrite aligned to policy v2.0, naming the CIO as Accountable Official and adding Indigenous data sovereignty commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official
- Removed: commitment that AI is not used where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted without a human intermediary
- Adds commitment that AI is not used for decision-making and all outputs are verified by authorised staff
- Aligns with Policy v2.0, Australia's AI Ethics Principles and the National AI Assurance Framework
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026 [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) [ Listen ](https:/ … ps://www.niaa.gov.au/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement-2026 "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") ## **Purpose** The[policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statementNational Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is committed to the safe, ethical, and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The NIAA will leverage AI to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples while ensuring alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The NIAA’s approach is guided by [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.digitalindustry.gov.au/poublicy/ai/transparency-statements). It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page discusses NIAA’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI to enhance public services for Indigenous Australians, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. ## NIAA approach to AI adoption and use ### Opportunities and risks The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) describes a familyations/australias-ai-ethics-principles). The NIAA supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty and applies the [Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data](https://www.niaa.gov.au/our-work/data-evaluation-and-research/framework-governance-indigenous-data-gid) to ensure that any use of AI strengthens community control, supports Closing the Gap priorities, and protects cultural rights through safe stewardship of Indigenous data. ## **How NIAA uses AI** The NIAA classifies its AI usage according to the [DTA Classification System](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Based ofn technologies that brings together computing power, scalability, networking, connected devices and interfaces, and data. AI technologies and systems built on these technologies can be programmed to perform specific tasks such as reasoning, planning, natural language processhis classification, the NIAA currently uses AI for workplace productivity. The NIAA has deployed enterprise tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat) for administrative efficiency, including drafting,computer vision, audio processing, interaction, prediction and more. AI technologies can operate with varying levels of autonomy. These potential efficiencies present opportunities for improved outcomes for service delivery, they also present risks. NIAA continues to review its internal policies to ensure our: 1. AI use is appropriately governed 1. engagement with AI is confident, culturally safe and responsible 1. stakeholders have trust in our use of AI 1. risks are identified and addressed 1. access and usage is monitored. ### How NIAA uses AI At this time NIAA has not authorised the use of AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, withorrespondence and summarising meetings. This is governed under the DTA Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government and aligned with the [National Framework for the Assurance of Artificial Intelligence in Government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). The NIAA adopts human oversight policy for AI use in the Agency. The NIAA does not use AI for decision-making. All AI-generated outputs ahuman intermediary or intervention. In September 2024 NIAA personnel gained access to a generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. Thre reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member. ## **Staff training and capability** To ensure the responsible usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. All staff are required to complete internal AI fundamentals training. NIAA is considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation through its technical partnership with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). See the ‘Adopting emerging technologies’ section in the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/miechnology, the NIAA mandates that all staff complete AI literacy and ethics training as a core requirement under the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). All NIAA staff will complete the [AI in Government Fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies). ## AI safety and governance ### Operating environment NIAA outsources the provision of its ICT network infrastructure & training from PM&C, governed under terms stipulated in a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Oneundamentals) course via the APS Academy. This training covers ethical implications, security risks, and output verification. ## **Governance, reporting, and compliance** To maintain public trust and meet Commonwealth mandatory requirements, the NIAA has implemented the following governance framework and will work ofn theterms in the MoU is NIAA will abide by PM&C’s ICT policies and procedures. Where a statement in this document conflicts with another PM&C AI or ICT policy then the latter will take precedence. ### Governance The governance of all NIAA’s official systems leverages PM&C ICT policies, protocols and procedures, including the PM&C AI Policy. The policy has been developed tose measures: 1. **Accountable Official:** The NIAA Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring agency-wide compliance with [AI policies](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability). 1. **Risk Management:** The NIAA will establish an assessment approach alignwithed to the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf), and outlines requirements for: 1. measuring effectiveness ofDTA AI Impact Assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) to identify privacy, security, and cultural safety risks for AI use cases. 1. **Mandatory Reporting:** The NIAA will maintain an internal AI Uservices through governance and other processes. 1. maintain compliance with applicable legislation, regulation, and whole of government policies. Please [contact us](https://www.niaa.gov.au/about-niaa/contact-us "Contact us") if you have further enquiries.Case Register. The NIAA will formally notify the DTA of transparency compliance and report any high-risk AI applications as required via the DTA Reporting Portal. 1. **Technical Standards:** The NIAA systems are integrated within PROTECTED ICT environment, managed in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). ## **Transparency and feedback** The NIAA reviews this statement annually. This statement was published on19 February27 March 20256 and will be reviewed annually, or when: 1. If there is asignificantnotable change to theagencyNIAA’s approach to AI, or 1.aAnyother new factorCommonwealth and/or DTA measures are introduced which will impactsthis statement.## Feedback Did you find this page useful? Yes No Do you have any oWe encourage feedback from the public regarding our use of these technologies. You can contact us on therfeedback? View our [website privacy notice](https://www.niaa.gov.au/website-privacy-notice "Website Privacy Notice"). Leave this field blankollowing email addresses: - **General enquiries:** [ai@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22ai@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Privacy matters:** [privacy@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22privacy@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Media enquiries:** [media@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22media@niaa.gov.au%22).TEQSA rewrites its statement: appoints a Chief AI Officer, stands up an AI Steering Group, flags Copilot analytics, adds monitoring measures and a new contact email.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer appointed alongside the Accountable Official (previously the CIO alone)
- AI Steering Group now established, with listed functions, rather than merely planned
- New commitment: no AI for decision-making, and no public or provider interaction with or significant impact from AI outputs without human review
- Discloses it is considering Microsoft Copilot analytics for productivity insights, in corporate/enabling and compliance and fraud detection domains
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement TEQSAacknowledgesis committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). TEQSA acknowledges the opportunities AI offers to improve productivity and is committed to using AI in a manner that is accountable, transparent and maintains public confidence in our agency. ## TEQSA’s approach to AI When considering the use of AI TEQSA will ensure any use follows the requirements of the Digital Transformation Agency’s [_Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)I in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) that sets the approach for the use of AI by government. ## How TEQSA uses AI TEQSA participated in a short Microsoft Copilot trial in 2024, which has now concluded. TEQSA uses MS productivity tools’ limited AI capabiliai/ai-in-government-policy). ## Why TEQSA is considering the adoption of AI TEQSA is considering using AI to enhance its ability to efficiently protect student interests and uphold the reputation of Australia's higher education sector. ## How we use and are considering using AI TEQSA will only use AI where it has been assessed and found to be safe, ethical and effective. Any risks associated with the use of AI will be assessed and managed in accordance with TEQSA’s broader risk framework and whole-of-government policies. TEQSA currently uses the limited AI capabilities of Microsoft productivity tools. TEQSA is considering using Microsoft Copilot analytiecsbut has not authorised the use of AI in service delivery including our regulatory function or decision-making processes. ## Training and assistance All TEQSA staff will be required to undertake the DTA’s AI fundamentals training modules to raise awareness and develop basic understanding of AI. ## Accountable officials The Chief Information Officer is designated as the accountable official for TEQSA. An AI Steering Committee will be established to develop an overarching agency approach to AI and assess the opportunities and risks in using AI within the agency. ## Statement review and updates This AI transparency statement was first published in March 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when significant change is made to our apfunctionality for insights and workplace productivity. The domains TEQSA is considering the use of AI in are corporate and enabling, and compliance and fraud detection. TEQSA is not considering the adoption of AI for decision-making purposes. TEQSA is not considering the use of AI in a manner where a member of the public or a higher education provider would directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI or its outputs without human review. ## How TEQSA will monitor the effectiveness of our AI use TEQSA will monitor: - our staff completion rates for mandatory AI training - productivity impacts of AI use - data and analytical insights generated by AI use - the nature, circumstance and impacts of any AI incidents. Based on the monitoring of AI effectiveness TEQSA will update its governance processes, guidance, policies and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. ## Governance We have established governance processes and forums to assess and review the use of AI. These include the establishment of an AI Steering Group (AISG) and appointment of an Accountable Official and a Chief AI Officer to oversee how TEQSA implements and uses AI. The functions of the AISG include: - promoting safe and responsible use of AI - overseeing the development of TEQSA’s AI policies and processes - setting-up and overseeing AI initiatives and pilots - developing pathways for staff, service providers and other stakeholders to report AI use concerns or incidents - overseeing development and implementation of mandatory AI capability training for all staff. ## Compliance TEQSA will only use AI when doing so is in accordance with applicable legislation, frameworks, policies and best proach to AI. ## Contact information If you have any enquiriestice. Any AI initiatives will align with the APS values, and TEQSA delivery of public value. ## Who to contact aboutthiTEQSA’s statement, we can be reached via the details on the [contact us](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/contact-us "Contact us") page of this websiteFor any questions regarding this statement, or for more information about how TEQSA uses AI, please email [enquiries@teqsa.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@teqsa.gov.au). ###### Last updated: 25 Mar 20256Refreshes the last-updated date to March 2026, with no change to the substance of the statement.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Transparent Use of AI at the Commission Published 28 February 2025 Last updated 25 March 2026 Share - \[Linkedin\](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&u … dates to this statement This transparency statement was last updatedoin26 FebruaryMarch 20256. We will update this statement at least every twelve months or when: … omy/term/6) [APS managers](https://www.apsc.gov.au/taxonomy/term/7)Was this page helpful? Yes No Please add your comments:## Acknowledgement of Country The APSC acknowledges the Traditional C …Replaces the Chief Technology Officer with the AI Branch Manager as an accountable official and drops the pledge to review the statement at least annually.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable official changed from CTO Andrew Morrison to AI Branch Manager Ramsey Beydoun (COO Tom Gilmartin unchanged)
- Removed: commitment to update the statement as the approach changes and at least every twelve months
- Removed: 'last updated 1 December 2025' line
- Body still refers to 'the CTO' having primary responsibility despite the officeholder change
The words that changed
… The DTA has two accountable officials under the policy. These are theChief Technology Officer (CTO), [_Andrew Morrison_](https://www.directory.gov.au/people/andrew-morrisoAI Branch Manager, [Ramsey Beydoun](https://www.directory.gov.au/portfolios/finance/digital-transformation-agency/chief-executive-officer-chris-fechner/deputy-ceo-strategy-planning-and-performance-lucy-poole/branch-manager-ai-technical-standards-ramsey-beydoun) and the Chief Operating Officer (COO), [_Tom Gilmartin_](https://ww … more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes.This transparency statement was last updated on 1 December 2025. It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months.**Update Publication Date** | **Update Comment**\ ---|---\ 1 November …Only site navigation links and the page's feedback and share widgets differ; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… - [ Appointment and authorisation instrument: Chief Security Officer/, ChiefRisk OfficInformation and Security Officer and Security Practitioner ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/ … information/operational-information/regulator-expectations-and-intent) - [ OAIC Freedom of Information Officers ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/operational-information/oaic-freedom-of-information-officers) - [ Accountability ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corp … lease contact the [OAIC directly.](https://www.oaic.gov.au/contact-us)This statement was last reviewed on 24 January 2026. Did you find this helpful?  Yes  No  We'd love to hear more!  Please tell us more Rate your experience We'd love to hear more about your rating What did you come here to do? How can we improve this information? ⨯ Share [ Facebook ](https://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) [ Twitter ](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement) [ Linkedin ](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite?url=https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement)Only a trailing block of site navigation links dropped out of the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ial\ GPO Box 1252\ CANBERRA ACT 2601\ Australia Fri, 2025-02-28 12:00Skip to main content - [About us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us "About us") - [Who we are](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are "Who we are") - [What we do](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do "What we do") - [Stakeholders and partners](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/stakeholders-and-partners "Stakeholders and partners") - [NHR Agreement](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/nhr-agreement "NHR Agreement") - [Our teams](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/our-people "Our teams") - [Leadership team](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/leadership-team "Leadership team") - [Organisational structure](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure "Organisational structure") - [Corporate governance](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance "Corporate governance") - [Contact us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/contact-us "Contact us") - [Careers](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/careers "Careers") - [Current vacancies](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/careers/current-vacancies "Current vacancies")Replaces its detailed statement with a short notice deferring to the Department of Social Services, dropping all named AI tools, safeguards and review commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: disclosure of GovAI, Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat use
- Removed: commitment that all AI outputs are checked by a human before being acted on
- Removed: annual review commitment and governance assurances (risk management, monitoring, protecting the public)
- Removed: staff AI training arrangements
The words that changed
… sparency-Statement-icon.png) # Our AI Transparency Statement ######February 3March 19, 2026 The Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission (the Commission) acknowledges the Digital Transformation Agency's [_**Policy for the responsible use of AI ingGovernment**_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) that sets the approach … ng from safe and responsible use of AI systems. Whilst the Commissionfollowsabides by the Digital Transformation Agency's [Policy for the responsible use of AI in GovernmentAs the Commission operates under the Department’s network and associated technologies, we are committed to aligning practices with the Department’s policies, standards, and governance frameworks, whilst also ensuring to follow the DTA’s Policy for reasonable use of AI in Government. The Commission will continue to develop our own capabilities, will ensure all approaches to emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, are consistent with the broader expectations and obligations of Government, whilst also meeting the specific needs of the Commission. The Commission understands Transparency is key to earning public trust and is an important aim of the DTA Policy and broader APS Reforms. The Commission has access to and is currently exploring AI capabilities through two main initiatives: our participation is through the Department’s GovAI program and the use of Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS. ### GovAI Program This initiative gives the Commission a chance to get hands-on experience with various AI tools in a secure, controlled setting. Our focus is on exploring how AI might boost productivity in our corporate and enabling functions, as well as enhance our policy development and data analytic capabilities. For more information visit - [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) ### Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS The Commission has authorised limited use of Microsoft Copilot through the GovTEAMS platform. This tool provides AI-assisted capabilities within the whole-of-government secure collaborative environment, further supporting day-to-day operations and decision-making processes. ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (DSS internal) In addition to the GovAI and Microsoft Copilot via GovTeams, the Commission has authorised the use of Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat within the DSS controlled environment. All AI outputs are checked by a human before they are applied or acted on. This ensures technology supports our operations but does not replace human judgment in areas that affect people’s lives. These initiatives are being undertaken with appropriate governance and oversight arrangements in place by the Department. Staff training on AI is a central consideration of these governance and oversight protocols, and mandatory training has been made available to Commission staff. The Department has advised additional training will be rolled out throughout the year to support staff participating in the AI initiatives and to build AI capability across the workforce, and the Commission is committed to being involved and developing training and support information relevant to the Commission. [The Launch of the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service](https://ministers.finance.gov.au/financeminister/speech/2025/11/12/launch-ai-plan-australian-public-service) was released in November 2025, where it has been advised ‘ _Every agency will have to appoint an SES level Chief AI Officer by July next year, whose role will be to drive adoption, champion strategic change within their agencies, and work alongside existing AI accountable officials to ensure compliance and coordination.’_ The Department has appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as their Accountable Official. This is consistent with the DTA Policy. The CIO is responsible for implementation of the DTA Policy and for leading on matters of AI within the Department. The Commission is currently exploring whether we are required to appoint a CIO or if we come under the appointment of the Department’s CIO. The Commission is committed to keeping up to date with changes in the AI policy and governance environment and engage with whole-of-government capacity building initiatives, such as GovAI, to encourage APS-wide capability uplift over time. While the Commission’s use of AI is currently limited to controlled trials and exploration, we are committed to ensuring compliance with applicable legislation andDue to this, the Department will assume the role of the SES level Chief AI Officer on behalf of the Commission. This is in line with whole of government transparency guidance and the Commission will rely on the Department’s AI Transparency Statement. The Department’s AI Transparency Statement provides information about how AI systems are governed and used and can be accessed at: [Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement) At a time where this information changes or updates are required, the Commission will inform the public by updating this webpage. The Director - Corporate Support remains as the contact for the Commission and the designated Executive Level 2 accountable official and will continue to work with DTA and the Department in regulations, and any future use of AI is undertaken safely and responsibly. The Commission will ensure: - AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible - risks are identified and managed - AI access and usage is monitored - measures are implemented to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems - efforts are made to protect the public against negative impacts. The Commission’s AI Transparency Statement will be reviewed and updated annually or when we make a significant change to our approach to AI. The Director - Governance and Corporate Coordination is designated as the accountable official under the Policy and may be contacted on [**to the Commission’s responsible use of AI. Any questions regarding the Commission’s use of AI can be directed to [corporate@dfsvc.gov.au**](mailto:corporate@dfsvc.gov.au). Thue, 2026-02-03 16:153-19 11:00 [Other](https://www.dfsvc.gov.au/taxonomy/term/25)Spells out "Chief AI Officer" in full instead of using the CAIO abbreviation, with no change to the roles described.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… public-service-ai-plan-2025), agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer(CAIO). The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the CAIOhief AI Officer and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, pr …Only the site's navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… changes or if any material change affects the statement’s accuracy.Skip to main content - [Home](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/ "Home") - [About](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-cca "About") - [Who we are](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/who-we-are "Who we are") - [Authority Meetings](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/authority-meetings "Authority Meetings") - [Corporate documents](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/corporate-documents "Corporate documents") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/reconciliation-action-plan "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Employment](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/employment "Employment") - [Information Publication Scheme](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-authority/information-publication-scheme "Information Publication Scheme") - [Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/emissions-reduction-plan "Emissions Reduction Plan") - [Projects](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/projects "Projects") - [Sector Pathways Review](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/sector-pathways-review "Sector Pathways Review") - [2035 Emissions Reduction Targets Advice](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/2035-emissions-reduction-targets-advice "2035 Emissions Reduction Targets Advice") - [Annual Progress Report](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/annual-progress-report "Annual Progress Report") - [ACCU Scheme Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/accu-scheme-reviews "ACCU Scheme Reviews") - [NGER Act Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/nger-act-reviews "NGER Act Reviews") - [Special Reviews](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/special-reviews "Special Reviews") - [Research reports](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/publications/research-reports "Research reports") - [Resources](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/resources "Resources") - [Climate Policy Tracker](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/climate-policy-tracker "Climate Policy Tracker") - [CCA Glossary](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/cca-glossary "CCA Glossary") - [Reports and Publications](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/reports-and-publications "Reports and Publications") - [Authority submissions to external consultations](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/authority-submissions-external-consultations "Authority submissions to external consultations") - [Consultation](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/public-consultation "Consultation") - [All News](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/latest-news "All News")#### Subscribe to email updates and news articles from the Climate Cha …AUSTRAC drops the line recording when the statement was last updated and promising annual review; site navigation and feedback chrome also disappears from the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: commitment to review the statement annually or when the approach to AI changes significantly
- Removed: "last updated 12 December 2025" currency marker
- Footer navigation, feedback widget and page date stamp no longer captured (page chrome)
The words that changed
… of our use of AI systems through continuous learning and adaptation.This statement was last updated on 12 December 2025 and will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI or when new factors impact this statement.If you have questions, concerns or would like more information about h … t be taken into account when determining how the law applies to you.Last updated: 9 Jan 2026Page ID: 1173 ## Was this page helpful?Was this page helpful? Was this page helpful? Yes No Why or why not? (optional) Please note that feedback you provide here will be used only for the purpose of improving our website. If you have a specific question about your AML/CTF obligations, please [contact us](https://www.austrac.gov.au/contact-us). Leave this field blank - [What we do](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do) - [Intelligence](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/intelligence) - [Regulation](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/regulation) - [Our people](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people) - [AUSTRAC CEO](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people/our-ceo) - [AUSTRAC organisational chart](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people/organisational-chart) - [Careers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/work-with-austrac) - [Current vacancies](https://www.austrac.gov.au/careers/current-vacancies) - [How to apply](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/how-apply) - [AUSTRAC culture and benefits](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/austrac-culture-and-benefits) - [AUSTRAC salary rates](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac/austrac-salary-rates "AUSTRAC salary rates and salary points") - [Our commitment to diversity and inclusion](https://www.austrac.gov.au/diversity-and-inclusion) - [Corporate information and governance](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance) - [Freedom of information](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information) - [Freedom of Information disclosure log](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/freedom-information-disclosure-log) - [Information publishing scheme](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/information-publishing-scheme) - [Information Publication Scheme Plan](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information/information-publication-scheme-plan) - [AUSTRAC policies](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies) - [AUSTRAC's approach to regulation](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/austracs-approach-regulation) - [Co-design at AUSTRAC](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/co-design-austrac) - [Code of conduct procedures](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/code-conduct-procedures "AUSTRAC's code of conduct procedures where a breach has occurred") - [English language translation policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/english-language-translation-policy) - [Exemption policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/exemption-policy) - [Privacy policy](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/privacy-policy) - [Public Interest Disclosures](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies/public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-austrac-procedures) - [Corporate plan](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/corporate-plan) - [Annual reports](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/annual-reports) - [Reports and accountability](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability) - [AUSTRAC Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) Charter](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-audit-and-risk-committee-charter) - [Statement of Expectations and Statement of Intent](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/statement-expectations-and-statement-intent) - [ACLEI corruption prevention report](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-integrity-assessment-aclei-corruption-prevention-report) - [Budget](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/budget) - [Commonwealth Child Safe Framework - annual statement of compliance (2021)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/commonwealth-child-safe-framework-annual-statement-compliance-2021) - [Contracts](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/contracts) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register "Gifts and benefits register") - [Grants](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/grants-awarded-austrac) - [Report on the statutory review of the AML/CTF Act and associated Rules and Regulations](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/report-statutory-review-amlctf-act-and-associated-rules-and-regulations) - [Review of the AUSTRAC industry contribution levy arrangements](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/review-austrac-industry-contribution-levy-arrangements) - [Senate file list](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/senate-file-list) - [AUSTRAC Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability/austrac-artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ✕Only the site's corporate publications navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… , please contact us at [ai@arpansa.gov.au](mailto:ai@arpansa.gov.au)Skip to main content - [Our service charter](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/service-charter "Our service charter") - [Corporate Plan](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan "Corporate Plan") - [Corporate Plan 2025–26](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2025-26 "Corporate Plan 2025–26") - [Corporate Plan 2024-25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2024-25 "Corporate Plan 2024-25") - [Corporate Plan 2023–24](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2023-24 "Corporate Plan 2023–24") - [Corporate Plan 2022–23](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2022-23 "Corporate Plan 2022–23") - [Corporate Plan 2021–22](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2021-22 "Corporate Plan 2021–22") - [Corporate Plan 2020–21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2020-21 "Corporate Plan 2020–21") - [Corporate Plan 2019–2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2019-2023 "Corporate Plan 2019–2023") - [Corporate Plan 2018-2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2018-2022 "Corporate Plan 2018-2022") - [Corporate Plan 2017-21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2017-21 "Corporate Plan 2017-21") - [Corporate Plan 2016-20](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/corporate-plan/corporate-plan-2016-20 "Corporate Plan 2016-20") - [Planning and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/planning-and-accountability "Planning and accountability") - [Regulator Performance Framework](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/regulator-performance "Regulator Performance Framework") - [Work health and safety policy statement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/work-health-and-safety "Work health and safety policy statement") - [Quarterly Report series](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-reports "Quarterly Report series") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2025 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2025") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2025 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2025") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2024 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2024") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2024 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2024") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2024 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2024") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2024](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2024 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2024") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2023 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2023") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2023 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2023") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2023 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2023") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2023](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2023 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2023") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2022 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2022") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2022 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2022") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2022 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2022") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2022](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2022 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2022") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2021 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2021") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2021 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2021") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2021 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2021") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2021](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2021 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2021") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2020 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2020") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2020 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2020") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2020 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2020") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2020](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2020 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2020") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2019 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2019") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2019 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2019") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2019 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2019") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2019](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2019 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2019") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2018 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2018") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2018 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2018") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2018 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2018") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2018](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2018 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2018") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-october-december-2017 "Quarterly Report - October to December 2017") - [Quarterly Report - July to September 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-july-september-2017 "Quarterly Report - July to September 2017") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2017 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2017") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2017 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2017") - [ARPANSA Research Strategy](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/arpansa-research-strategy "ARPANSA Research Strategy") - [ARPANSA's artificial intelligence transparency statement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/arpansas-artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement "ARPANSA's artificial intelligence transparency statement") - [Annual Report series](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports "Annual Report series") - [Annual Report 2024-25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2024-25 "Annual Report 2024-25") - [Annual Report 2023–24](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2023-24 "Annual Report 2023–24") - [Annual Report 2022–23](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2022-23 "Annual Report 2022–23") - [Annual Report 2021–22](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2021-22 "Annual Report 2021–22") - [Annual Report 2020–21](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2020-21 "Annual Report 2020–21") - [Annual Report 2019–20](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2019-20 "Annual Report 2019–20") - [Annual Report 2018-19](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2018-19 "Annual Report 2018-19") - [Annual Report 2017-18](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18 "Annual Report 2017-18") - [Letter of transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report "Letter of transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-0 "Reader's guide") - [Acknowledgement of Country](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-1 "Acknowledgement of Country") - [ARPANSA snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-2 "ARPANSA snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-3 "Part 1: CEO foreword") - [Part 2: Agency overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-4 "Part 2: Agency overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-15 "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-5 "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - ARPANSA leads the way as a SunSmart workplace](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-6 "Case study 1 - ARPANSA leads the way as a SunSmart workplace") - [Case study 2 - ANSTO Nuclear Medicine licence to operate](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-7 "Case study 2 - ANSTO Nuclear Medicine licence to operate") - [Case study 3 - Our role in the proposed National Radioactive Waste Management Facility project](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-8 "Case study 3 - Our role in the proposed National Radioactive Waste Management Facility project") - [Case study 4 - LearnHub: an innovative way to expand ARPANSA’s capabilities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-9 "Case study 4 - LearnHub: an innovative way to expand ARPANSA’s capabilities") - [Part 4: Management and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-10 "Part 4: Management and accountability") - [Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-11 "Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-12 "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6: Appendix 1 - ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-13 "Part 6: Appendix 1 - ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Part 6: Appendix 2 - Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-14 "Part 6: Appendix 2 - Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-16 "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-17 "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2017-18/2017-18-annual-report-18 "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2016-17](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17 "Annual Report 2016-17") - [Letter of transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report "Letter of transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-0 "Reader's guide") - [Acknowledgement of Country](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-1 "Acknowledgement of Country") - [ARPANSA snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-2 "ARPANSA snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-3 "Part 1: CEO foreword") - [Part 2: Agency overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-4 "Part 2: Agency overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-5 "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-6 "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - ARPANSA’s website](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-7 "Case study 1 - ARPANSA’s website") - [Case study 2 - The Personal Radiation Monitoring Service](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-8 "Case study 2 - The Personal Radiation Monitoring Service") - [Case study 3 - Ultraviolet Radiation Services](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-9 "Case study 3 - Ultraviolet Radiation Services") - [Case study 4 - ConvEx-3: ARPANSA’s part in an international nuclear emergency exercise](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-10 "Case study 4 - ConvEx-3: ARPANSA’s part in an international nuclear emergency exercise") - [Part 4: Management and accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-11 "Part 4: Management and accountability") - [Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-12 "Part 4: Management and accountability - Human resources") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-13 "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-14 "Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Part 6 - Appendix 2: Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-15 "Part 6 - Appendix 2: Operations of the Radiation Health and Safety Advisory Council and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-16 "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-17 "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2016-17/2016-17-annual-report-18 "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2015-16](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16 "Annual Report 2015-16") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-letter-transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Reader's guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-readers-guide "Reader's guide") - [ARPANSA Snapshot](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-arpansa-snapshot "ARPANSA Snapshot") - [Part 1: CEO Foreword](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-1-ceo-foreword "Part 1: CEO Foreword") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-2-agency-overview "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-3-report-performance "Part 3: Report on performance") - [Part 3: Report on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-3-report-financial-performance "Part 3: Report on financial performance") - [Case study 1 - The ACDS](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-case-study-1-acds "Case study 1 - The ACDS") - [Case study 2 - The ANRDR](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-case-study-2-anrdr "Case study 2 - The ANRDR") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-4-management-and-accountability "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Part 5: Financial statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-5-financial-statements "Part 5: Financial statements") - [Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licencing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-appendix-1-arpansa-licensing-activities "Part 6 - Appendix 1: ARPANSA licencing activities") - [Appendix 2: Operations of RHSAC and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-appendix-2-operations-rhsac-and-committees "Appendix 2: Operations of RHSAC and Committees") - [Part 7: Index](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-report-series/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report "Part 7: Index") - [List of compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-part-7-list-compliance "List of compliance") - [Copyright and contact details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2015-16/2015-16-annual-report-copyright-and-contact-details "Copyright and contact details") - [Annual Report 2014-15](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15 "Annual Report 2014-15") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Part 1: CEO's Review](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-1 "Part 1: CEO's Review") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3.1: Public, workers and environment](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3 "Part 3.1: Public, workers and environment") - [Part 3.2: Radiological & nuclear safety & security](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-2 "Part 3.2: Radiological & nuclear safety & security") - [Part 3.3: Ionising radiation in medicine](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-3 "Part 3.3: Ionising radiation in medicine") - [Part 3.4: Regulation and enforcement activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-3-4 "Part 3.4: Regulation and enforcement activities") - [Part 3.5: Stakeholder engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part3-5 "Part 3.5: Stakeholder engagement") - [Part 3.6: Discussion on financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part3-6 "Part 3.6: Discussion on financial performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations") - [Appendix 10: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Publications") - [Appendix 11: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 12: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/appendix-12 "Appendix 12: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/guide "Reader guides") - [Copyright and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2014-15/imprint "Copyright and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2013-14](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14 "Annual Report 2013-14") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Part 1: CEO's Review](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-1 "Part 1: CEO's Review") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3.1: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3 "Part 3.1: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.2: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-2 "Part 3.2: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-3 "Part 3.3: Report on Performance") - [Part 3.4: Stakeholder engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-4 "Part 3.4: Stakeholder engagement") - [Part 3.5: International engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-5 "Part 3.5: International engagement") - [Part 3.6: Discussions and analysis of financial performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-3-6 "Part 3.6: Discussions and analysis of financial performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: ANAO recommendations") - [Appendix 10: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Publications") - [Appendix 11: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 12: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/appendix-12 "Appendix 12: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/guide "Reader guides") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2013-14/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2012-13](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13 "Annual Report 2012-13") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Our Agency](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/our-agency "Our Agency") - [Part 1: Review by the CEO](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-1 "Part 1: Review by the CEO") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-3 "Part 3: Report on Performance") - [Part 4: Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/part-4 "Part 4: Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement") - [Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 4: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 6: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 9: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: Publications") - [Appendix 10: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-10 "Appendix 10: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 11: Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/appendix-11 "Appendix 11: Index of Compliance") - [Reader guides](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/guide "Reader guides") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2012-13/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Annual Report 2011-12](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12 "Annual Report 2011-12") - [Letter of Transmittal](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/transmittal "Letter of Transmittal") - [Our Agency](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/our-agency "Our Agency") - [Part 1: Review by the CEO](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-1 "Part 1: Review by the CEO") - [Part 2: Agency Overview](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-2 "Part 2: Agency Overview") - [Part 3: Report on Performance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-3 "Part 3: Report on Performance") - [Part 4 Management and Accountability](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/part-4 "Part 4 Management and Accountability") - [Appendix 1: Work Health and Safety](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-1 "Appendix 1: Work Health and Safety") - [Appendix 2: Information Publication Scheme](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-2 "Appendix 2: Information Publication Scheme") - [Appendix 3: Advertising and market research](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-3 "Appendix 3: Advertising and market research") - [Appendix 4: Ecologically sustainable development](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-4 "Appendix 4: Ecologically sustainable development") - [Appendix 5: Legal services directions](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-5 "Appendix 5: Legal services directions") - [Appendix 6: ARPANSA licensing activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-6 "Appendix 6: ARPANSA licensing activities") - [Appendix 7: Operations of Council and Committees](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-7 "Appendix 7: Operations of Council and Committees") - [Appendix 8: Publications](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-8 "Appendix 8: Publications") - [Appendix 9: Financial Statements](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-9 "Appendix 9: Financial Statements") - [Appendix 10 Index of Compliance](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/appendix-10 "Appendix 10 Index of Compliance") - [Reader guide](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/guide "Reader guide") - [Printing and Contact Details](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2011-12/imprint "Printing and Contact Details") - [Emissions Reduction Plan 2024/25](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/emissions-reduction-plan-202425 "Emissions Reduction Plan 2024/25") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/reconciliation-action-plan "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Significant regulatory activities](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/significant-regulatory-activities "Significant regulatory activities") - [Report to Parliament - Radiation exposure of a worker at ANSTO Health, Lucas Heights on 22 August 2017](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/reports-parliament/report-parliament-radiation-exposure-worker-ansto "Report to Parliament - Radiation exposure of a worker at ANSTO Health, Lucas Heights on 22 August 2017")[
- Removed: statement of last update (24 February 2025) and the commitment to update at least every 12 months
- New internal AI policy updated March 2026, aligned to the APS AI Plan 2025 and staff guidance on public generative AI; earlier interim guidance reference dropped
- Adds mandatory staff training on responsible AI use
The words that changed
# **AI Transparency Statement** Screen Australia is committed to safe,responsible,ethical, andtransparentresponsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)technologies i. Screen Australia recognises that AI tools offer opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery, while requiring careful management of risks. In accordance with the principles outlined by the Digital Transformatio … use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)(“the Policy”). In accordance with the requirements under the Policy, this Transparency Statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption. We acknowledge that AI usage and adoption is rapidly evolving, and are committed to ongoing refinement of our policies and approaches to, this statement outlines Screen Australia’s approach to AI usage and adoption, and how AI related risks are being managed. ### How we use AI.Screen Australia’s accountable official who is responsible for implementing the Policy is our Chief Operating Officer, Grainne Brunsdon. The accountable official’s other responsibilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use cases - acting asenables staff and contractors to use AI tools responsibly to improve productivity in the course of their work and service delivery, while protecting confidential, personal and sensitive information and maintaining public trust. In March 2026, we updated our internal Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia’s cEmployees & Contractpoint for AI - engaging with whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keeping up to date with changing requirements. ### **How Screen Australia uses AI** Screen Australia supports the ethical and legal use of AI technologies and services. We do not currently use AI technologies or services where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, AI usage, without a human intermediary or human intervention. Screen Australia currently uses AI in the domains, as defined by the DTA, of ‘service delivery’ and ‘corporate and enabling’.ors. The policy incorporates the Australian Government’s [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) and [Staff guidance on public generative AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai). We also implemented mandatory training for staff on the responsible use of AI. Our internal policy states the terms for approved usage of AI tools by Screen Australiaalsoemploys the DTA defined usage patterns of ‘workplace productivity’ and ‘analytics for insights’. ### **Approach to Staff Usage** Staff may access AI technologies and services in the course of their wees and contractors. It reminds all Screen Australia employees and contractors that they: - are fully accountable forkand onll workdevices if the technology and service has been approved by the agency. In August 2024, we introduced an internal _Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Screen Australia Employees & Contractors_, that states the terms upon which our employees and contractors will: - seek approval to use AI technology and services. - use AI technology and services if approved. This internal policy requires staff to comply with the Australian Government’s [_Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai)when using any approved AI tool, and reminds employees and contractors of their current obligations under policy, contract and applicable laws. The interim guidance requires staff above all to: - be able to explain, justify and take ownership of their advice and decisions - not input anything into an AI tool that could reveal classified, personal or otherwise sensitive information. The agency also held an internal mandatory webinar to educate Screen Australia staff about these terms of approval and usage. Screen Australia follows the direction of Government on the use of specific AI platforms, such as the February directive regarding DeepSeek. From February 2025, staff cannot access or use DeepSeek on Screen Australia devices or private devices that contain agency email accessproducts, advice and decisions - must not input anything into an AI tool that could reveal confidential, personal or commercial in confidence information. Screen Australia’s internal policy also states the terms upon which contractors and consultants must follow Screen Australia’s security requirements, and disclose and document their AI use. AI tools used by Screen Australia staff includes enterprise AI deployed in our closed internal ICT environment, including Microsoft 365 Copilot, as well as publicly available browser-based or app-based AI such as ChatGPT and Claude. Screen Australia follows the direction of Government on the use of specific AI platforms. For example, following the directive from Government, Screen Australia staff cannot access or use DeepSeek on agency devices or personal devices that contain a work profile. The public do not have direct interaction with any Screen Australia systems that utilise AI technologies and will not by impacted by our use of AI. The tasks completed by Screen Australia staff using AI falls into several domains and usage patterns as outlined by the DTA’s Classification system for AI use. These are: - The domains of ‘service delivery’ and ‘corporate and enabling’; and - The usage patterns ‘workplace productivity’ and ‘analytics for insights’. ###**ManagingSstakeholderUusage**Any use of AI by our stakeholders, including applicants for funding, must be declared and be consistent with Screen Australia’s [Terms of Trade](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/screen-australia/about-us/doing-business-with-us/terms-of-trade), the relevant program guidelines, and any applicable laws.In September 2024, Screen Australia published a set of[ ](<https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-guiding-principles>)[AI Guiding Principles](<https://www.sWe are continually reviewing opportunities to assist stakeholders to balance the uptake of AI as a tool for innovation and best practice, alongside the safe and responsible use of AI. In September 2024, ScreenaAustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-gpublished a set of AI Guiding-pPrinciples>), which publicly articulates our expectations around the proposed use of AI technologies or services by Screen Australia and its stakeholders.is continually reviewing opportunities to assist stakeholders to balance the uptake of AI as a tool for innovation and best practice, alongside the safe and responsible use of AI. This includes supdated all agency funding application forms to collect information on AI usage in applications, and in projects and activities seeking agency funding. The information is collected for research purposes only, to better inform the agency on how AI tools may be used by applicants. ### Monitoring & Compliance Screen Australia has a risk-based approach to the use of AI. We monitor the effectiveness of AI systems by harvingupdates and insights from subject matter experts. This Transparency Statement was last updated on 24 February 2025. It will be updated as Screen Australia’srobust governance arrangements, policies and processes; and monitoring AI usage. We acknowledge that AI usage and adoption is rapidly evolving, and are committed to ongoing refinement of our policies and approaches to AIchanges, and at least every 12 months. For enquiries about Screen Australia’s adoption of AI, please contact [email protected] ## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, and co-productions with Australia, including key cast and creatives, duration, genre, co-production partners, international sales contacts, website links and more. \_\_to align with Government guidance and requirements, regulation and best practice. We also commit to updating our approaches in accordance with applicable legislation, including relevant copyright and privacy laws. Screen Australia’s designated accountable official who is responsible for implementing the DTA’s policy is our Chief Operating Officer, Grainne Brunsdon. The accountable official’s other responsibilities include: - reporting of newly identified high-risk use cases - acting as Screen Australia’s contact point for AI - engaging with whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keeping up to date with changing requirements. For enquiries about Screen Australia’s adoption and usage of AI, please contact [email protected].Treasury rewrites its statement, promising a Chief AI Officer by July 2026, naming new endorsed tools and aligning with the APS AI Plan 2025.
read by Claude Opus 5- Commits to appointing a Chief AI Officer by July 2026 to lead AI transformation
- Adds Microsoft Copilot Chat as an endorsed tool and permits some public generative AI tools under DTA staff guidance
- Public-interaction commitment reworded: no direct public interaction, no AI-made decisions, human oversight for all use
- Removed: framing of Copilot as the government trial with continued access for trial participants
The words that changed
False Treasury is exploring the benefits of emerging technologies such as AI. Treasury follows the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) which provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officialsility), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai/-transparency-statements).provides decontailnsof theTreasury’simplementation of these policy requirements. ## Accountable Officials TheAI transparency statement and outlines progress against the outcomes in the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). ## Key roles Treasury has designated the Chief Information Officer (CIO) as theaAccountableoOfficial for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the department.## Intentions Behind AI Adoption AI applications are used internally to support workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our analytical capabilities, improve decision‑making processes, and increase operational efficiency. ## AI Use Cases The Treasury participated in the Australian Government’s trial of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. The Treasury now continues to make Copilot available to trial participants, under the classification of workplace productivity. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, Treasury staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AIAccountable Officials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed by July 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at Treasury. ## AI adoption Treasury’s endorsed AI products for staff use are Microsoft 365 Copilot and Microsoft Copilot Chat. Treasury permits use of some publicly available AI tools in line with the Digital Transformation Agency’s [staff guidance on public generative AI.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai) Enterprise AI tools are piloted based on business needs. Low-risk use cases are in an exploratory stage. Treasury’s current use of AI is classified as workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our operational efficiency. ## PublicIinteraction with AITheTreasury does not use AI in ways that the public mayat involve directlyinteraction withor be significantly impacted by without human intervention. ## Monitoring Effectiveness Wethe public, and decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at Treasury has human oversight. ## Governance of AI Appropriate governance arrangements have been establishedrobust processes, including regular reviews, audits, and staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. These operate in tandem with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards and common proceduresto support AI within Treasury. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI in Government Fundamentals course is available for all staff and is mandatory under the APS AI plan. As a prerequisite to utilising Enterprise AI tools, staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM).## Training and Governance Impacted staff will have access to training that aligns with the responsible and acceptable use of AI policies, and appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within Treasury. ## Protecting Against Negative Impacts We have established robust processes and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. Our efforts are aligned with broader Australian Government security policies, principles, minimum standards, and common procedures as outlined in the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and Information Security Manual (ISM). The use of publicly available AI services is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Compliance with Legislation The Treasury complies with all applicable legislation and regulations. We are committed to maintaining transparency and accountability in our AI practices through the AI transparency statement. ## Update Frequency ThiWe have robust processes, regular reviews and audits, and proactive risk management strategies, including staff training programs, to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI. The use of AI is governed by our IT Acceptable Use Policy, Treasury’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ## Update frequency Treasury’s transparency statement is reviewed and updated annually or whenever significant changes occur. The most recent update was on 28 February 20256. For further enquiries, please contact the Chief Information Officer …The words that changed
… standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.financedigital.gov.au/about-us/departmentpolicy/ai/AI-technical-standard) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguar … urces/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are:·- analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse in … e Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information·- workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with … very and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within theDdecision making and administrative action or Image processing usage patterns, or theCcompliance and fraud detection, and Law enforcement, intelligence and s …Minor style edits: lower-cases "artificial intelligence" and "freedom of information", turns a bolded line into a heading, and trims a word.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… e a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsibleAartificialIintelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI … - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations -Ffreedom ofIinformation considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and respo … ts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making.**## Australian AI Safety Institute**We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key act … logies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It willalsosupport ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and busin …Rewrites the statement: Copilot now live for staff, a new AI working group and legal-research tools flagged, named officials and the assurance-framework pilot dropped.
read by Claude Opus 5- Microsoft Copilot now in actual use by all staff (previously only an intended April 2025 trial)
- Removed: names of the Accountable Official (Mandeep Bahia) and Executive Director (Ruth Barson), now only titles
- New statement that AI is not used in ways the public directly interacts with or is significantly impacted by, with a promise to update if that changes
- New disclosure of a February 2026 staff working group assessing broader AI use, including submission analysis, proofing and document handling
The words that changed
# AI Transparency Statement ThepDigital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in governmentprovides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating torequires agencies to designate AI accountable officials and publish a public AI transparency statements. This page provides details of the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC)’s implementation of thesepolicyrequirements. ## **Accountable Official** The ALRC has an AI Accountable Official under the policy,. The ALRC’s AI Accountable Official is the Director of Operations and Finance(Mandeep Bahia), reporting to the Executive Director of the ALRC(Ruth Barson). There is no change to the ALRC’s accountable official. The AI Accountable Official has primary responsibility for the development and application of the ALRC’s AI policy across the follownd implementation approach, including: -Ffacilitating ALRC involvement in cross-government AI coordination and collaboration -Ddeveloping and maintaining the ALRC’s AI policy andits associated implementation plansupporting resources - uplifting governance, education and guidance for AI use in the ALRC -Eembedding a culture thatfairlybalances AI risk management and innovation -Uplifting governance and education of AI adoption in the ALRC - Enhancing the response andmonitoring implementation - supporting adaptation toAI policychanges inthe ALRC - Encouraging the development or alignment of an ALRC or Inquiry-specific AI policy - Reviewing and monitoring ALRC’s AI policy implementation regularly and providing feedback to the ALRC’s President and Audit & Risk Committeewhole-of-government AI policy over time. ## **ALRC’sAapproach to AIAadoption andUuse** The ALRChas not yet used AIis committed to adopting any formal setting or supported any Law Reform activities to date. Our intention is to trial the adoption of AI in 2025 and beyond as part ofd using AI in a way that is safe, ethical, accountable and transparent, consistent witheAustralian Government’s commitment to digital innovrequirements and community expectations.The ALRC is committed to demonstrating, encouraging, and supporting the safe and responsible adoption of AI within the Australian Public Service, and in digital and ICT investments, systems, and digital services. As part of this commitment, we will implement AI fundamentals training for all staff, regardless of their rAt present, the ALRC’s approach is to: - use AI only for approved, low-risk workplace productivity purposes, and - build organisational capability and governance so we can assess whether, and how, AI might responsibly support additional activities over time (subject to risk assessment and approvals). As part of this commitment, the ALRC maintains internal guidance and training requirements for staff on the safe and responsible use of AI tooles. ## **How the ALRCUuses AIAt this time, we are not using AI to support any of our Law Reform activities or engage with the public. From April 2025 we intend to trial AI to support Workplace Productivity and trial generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We understand that the Australian government trailed this software from 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024 and a number of commonwealth agencies have adopted this software. Copilot has yet to be formally announced internally or made available to staff officially. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, ALRC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. We also intend to consider the use of AI tools to support Legal Research and will look to Pilot Lexis Nexis+ AI or similar such products which are used within the legal industry to support research. We have a policy and SharePoint page on the use of AI tools by staff, which staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with before accessing any generative AI tools online. This policy encourages and assists staff to: - Not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without external verification. - Prohibit the distribution of sensi** ### **Public interaction and impact** The ALRC is not using AI in a way the public can directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, If this changes, we will update this statement to describe the use and safeguards ### **Law reform activities** The ALRC does not use AI for strictly law reform activities, including legal analysis, drafting or recommendations. AI does not produce or materially influence inquiry outputs. ### **Corporate and workplace productivity** Our current AI use is limited to workplace productivity. All staff have access to Microsoft Copilot, and Microsoft 365 Copilot is available to approved roles across the organisation (for example, for collaboration, meeting support, and drafting and summarising routivne material(as outlined in Clause 9.2 in the [Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework – Release 2024 Guidelines](https://www.pr). ## **Planned AI work** In February 2026, the ALRC established a staff working group to assess broader AI use, including potecntivesecurity.gov.au/system/files/2025-02/pspf-release-2024-guidelines_0.pdf)) to third parties, for example by copy-and-pasting sensitive content into AI software. - Sensitive materials contain information which, if disclosed without authorisation, could cause harm to an organisation, individual, or national security. These may include but is not limited to: - legal analysis documents, - confidential cal trials for inquiry-adjacent tasks such as submission analysis support, proofing and document handling (subject to governance and approval). The group is also considering legal-specific tools (for example, LexisNexis AI+ and Westlaw Edge) for porate information, - personal staff information, - stakeholder consultations, - judicial reviews for ALRC papers, - outcomes of Commissioner meetings, - ALRC internal discussion papers. The above is in line with the [ALRC Privacy Policy](https://www.alrc.gov.au/about/policies/privacy-policy/). The ALRC is participating in the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. Through our participation in this pilot, we are exploring the potential for AI to be used by our staff and by our ICT systems. The ALRC will use AI in the domain of Corporate and Enabling, and usage pattern of Workplace Productivityssible future legal research support, noting these tools are not currently used for inquiry work. We have internal guidance and a SharePoint page on the use of AI tools. Staff are required to confirm and acknowledge they are familiar with this guidance before accessing AI tools. Our guidance reminds staff to verify AI-generated content and to avoid sharing or copying sensitive material into AI tools, consistent with relevant Australian Government security and privacy requirements. ## **AISsafety andGgovernance** Within the ALRC, all AI use cases are recorded in an internal regist … I use case - Implement measures to mitigate potential harms from AIIt will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. For further information or enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of artificial intelligence, you can contact us directly at## **Classification of AI system use cases** The DTA standard requires agencies to classify AI use by usage pattern and domain. The ALRC’s current AI use is classified as: - Usage pattern: Workplace productivity using Microsoft CoPilot and Copilot 365. - Domain: Corporate and enabling. If the ALRC’s AI use expands to additional usage patterns or domains, we will update this statement accordingly. ## **Updates to this statement** This statement will be updated as the ALRC’s approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. It may also be updated sooner when the ALRC makes a significant change to its approach to AI, or when any new factor materially impacts the statement’s accuracy. ## **Contact** For enquiries about the ALRC’s adoption of AI, contact: [info@alrc.gov.au](mailto:info@alrc.gov.au).AFSA adds Service Delivery to its disclosed AI domains, flags planned compliance with policy v2.0, and drops its last-updated date.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds Service Delivery alongside Corporate & Enabling as a domain of AI use
- New commitment to plan for compliance with the additional requirements of policy v2.0
- Workplace productivity use now also covers summarising meetings
- Governance refresh recast from 'currently refreshing' to work done over the past year
The words that changed
… y and adaptiveness after deployment._ ## Oversight of our use of AIWe are currentlyOver the past year, we have worked towards refreshing our approach to data and information governance to include … of the AI use cases. ## Our use of AI AFSA is using AI in the domains of Service Delivery and Corporateand& Enabling, and usage patterns of Analytics for Insights (for example,e.g. codebase analysis, and forecasting and predictive modelling to suppor … ht generation), and Workplace Productivity (e.g. summarising documents, meetings and emails, and preparing internal content creation). This does not … FSA. - publication of this transparency statement on AFSA's website. We are also planning our approach to achieving compliance with the additional requirements within the timeframes required by the current version of the policy (v2.0). This statement will be reviewed annually, when there is a significant … any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy.**Last updated:** 24/02/2025**For further enquiries, contact:**[info@afsa.gov.au](mailto:info@afsa … ov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ai-transparency-statement)Was this information helpful? Yes No What were you looking for? Please provide your feedback Client type - None -Current clientCreditorGeneral publicPractitionerFinancial counsellorStaffOther We welcome your feedback to help us improve our website. We are unable to respond to comments or suggestions. Alternatively, if you would like a response, you can [send us feedback](https://services.afsa.gov.au/ccr-service/form/start) or [contact us](https://www.afsa.gov.au/contact-us "Contact us"). Leave this field blankRewrites its statement for 2026: adds an approved AI policy, a second accountable official, regulatory risk models, and a June 2026 strategy deadline.
read by Claude Opus 5- Adds a Director of AI alongside the Chief Digital Information Officer as AI Accountable Officials
- Discloses an AI Policy approved 10 December 2025 and promises an updated statement reflecting its AI strategy by 15 June 2026
- Names regulatory risk models as an analytics-for-insights use
- Removed: explicit statement that the Commission makes no use of automated decision-making
The words that changed
AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 1 of23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from2504/023/2025 The Commission’s6 ACQSC AItTransparencysStatement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission)useemploysaArtificialiIntelligence (AI)WeThe Commission complyies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency’s(DTA)standards, in its role as whole-of-government coordinator onemployees. The DTA is the AI whole of Australian Government coordinator. Their AI standards(APS), includeing: • Policy for the responsible use of AI in government • Standard for … t use of public generative AI tools • Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. Why we use AI We are committed to improvOur stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ The Commission’s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026. Why we use AI The Commission is dedicated to enhancing the quality and efficiency of our services by introducingway. We are looking into AI opportunitimanner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities, while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support ourinto protectingand improve the safety, healthand, wellbeingofand quality of life for people receiving. We want to benefit from the technology it provides. But we will also manage its risks. How we use AI At the moment we have limited use ofservices. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s classification system: • Usage patterns: o Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, and o Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ • Domains: o Compliance, o Corporate and enabling, and o Service delivery. Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI,and no use of automated decision-making. Inpplications do not impact the public, and members of the public are not required to interact with AI applications in dealinegs withDTA’s classification system, how we use AI (our usage patterns) and the aCommission. This transparency statement will be updated if this changes. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying any negative impacts from the use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI • The Commission ensureas thatwe use it in (domains) include: • usage patterns: o runnAI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests of the public, including the recipients of aged care services. • The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI inganalytics for insights o improving workplace productivity by automating everyday tasks • domains: o compliance o corporate and enabling o service deliveryccordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice.\ The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliance as it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission’s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop additional, Commission specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission’s ongoing commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page23 of23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from2504/023/2025 Public interaction and impact We do not use AI applications that affect the public or to interact with them. We will update this transparency statement if this changes. When AI is used more widely, we will identify any negative effects from using it, and protect the public and people receiving aged care. We will continue to work with AI in a responsible way and be open and honest about it. Making sure we use AI safely and responsibly • We make sure that AI projects are consistent with our values and are in the best interests of the public. This includes people receiving aged care. • We apply DTA policies and use AI in line with legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. We are developing an AI strategy which will define how we use AI alongside data governance, data privacy and cybersecurity compliance. It will also follow our Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will use whole of Australian Government policies and develop other policies and processes specific to the Commission. This will support us to: • maintain strong governance frameworks • protect against negative impacts • make sure AI systems are effective. Our policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. We will also develop and educate all staff with AI basics resources. We will update this transparency statement at least once a year, or as we develop and change how we use AI, our6 This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology.\ AccountableoOfficial The Commission’s Chief DigitalOfficer isInformation Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI. Cs.\ How to contact us abouthow weour use of AI If you have any questions about this statement orourthe Commission’s use of AI, you can contact thet:s follows:\ • email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 20256Fair Work Ombudsman fully rewrites its statement for policy v2.0, naming Chief AI Officers, a use-case classification table and a new email contact, while dropping earlier detail.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names Chief AI Officers: the CIO and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role (CIO remains AI Accountable Official)
- Adds commitment that AI is not used where the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, it
- Adds a domain/usage-pattern classification table (compliance and fraud detection, law enforcement, policy and legal, corporate enabling --- all internal use)
- Declares compliance with the DTA Policy 2.0 and promises an AI Strategy 2026-27 and AI Governance Framework by March 2026
The words that changed
1www.fairwork.gov.au Page 1 AI Transparency Statementis committed to engaging responsibly and transparently with Auses artificialIintelligence (AI)technologies to support its purpose to promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. Recognising the transformative potential of AI, the Agency is taking a proactive but cautious approach, focusing on internal workforce improvements and internal capacity building while ensuring that AI is implemented ethically, securely, and responsibly. This statement outlines the, how AI-related risks are governed and managed, and how the Agency complies with the Digital Transformation Agency'’scommitment to meeting the(DTA) Policy fortheResponsible Use of AI in(Policy). The Agency will adopt AI technologies transparently and securely, informed by genuine consultation with our2.0 and other applicable Commonwealth AI legislation, regulations, and frameworks. The Agency is committed to a staff and ensuring alignment with government-wide principles for responsible AI implementation. The Agency’s approach includes participation in Whole-of-Government Trials, developing robust internal governance structurese and responsible use of AI to support our purpose of promoting harmonious, productive, cooperative, andacommitment to addressing critical areas such as purpose, decision-making, risk mitigation, data protection and public transparency as AI adoption evolves. Central to this commitment is maintaining public trust and ensuring AI activities we conduct are ethical and responsible. Commitment to Transparency and Public Trust The Agency recognises the importance of transparency in maintaining public trust as we determine our approach to, and implementation of, AI. We will ensure that AI adoption remains transparent, accountable, and aligned with the latest standards and ethical guidelines. If we decide to use personal information when we procure or build AI technologies, we will comply with the Australian Privacy Principles and will provide an explanation of how personal information has been used in a way which is transparent and easily understood. The Agency will continue to adopt AI cautiously, ensuring that use aligns with our core values of fairness, respect, and accountability, and that it delivers meaningful benefits to both the community we serve and our employees. 2 Current AI Use The Agency’s engagement with AI is in its initial stages and primarily focused on establishing robust governance processes to effectively leverage AI in a safe, ethical, and responsible way that complies with our legislative and policy obligations. For example, through the Whole-of-Government Co-Pilot AI Trial a small subset of Agency staff have undertaken training and explored the potential of this secure generative AI tool to enhance productivity and business outcomes. A number of software products we use to support our administrative functions include AI tools within the product offering. The Agency also leverages software products with AI features such as technologies used for language conversion and chatbot designed to make finding information onpliant workplace relations. This means that while AI systems and capabilities may provide insights or administrative support, all decisions regarding compliance, enforcement, and entitlements, are made by authorised Agency staff. AI systems and capabilities are strictly advisory, and their outputs are reviewed and verified by our staff. Approach to AI use Our use of AI is guided by the DTA’s Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government 2.0, the Department of Industry Science and Resources Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, and our Agency's core operational principles. We use secure, commercially available software (including generative AI systems and AI capabilities) to address a variety of AI use cases, enabling our staff to focus on high-value complex work. Classification of AI use Consistent with the DTA’s Classification system for AI use, we classify our current AI use cases under the following usage patterns; noting we do not use AI where the public may directly interact with, ourwebsite easier for users. Currently, AI is not used for dbe significantly impacted by it: Domain Decision-makingwithin the Agency or by the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO). Our use of AI falls under the classification of wand administrative action Analytics for insights Workplace productivityand analytics for insights under the Policy. Guiding Principles and Planned Activities for AI Use The FWO is committed to establishing a strong foundation for responsible, ethical and transparImage processing Service delivery Compliance and fraud detection Internal use Law enforcement,adoption of AI. As the Agency begins to explore the potential of AI technologies, it remains focused on setting up robust governance mechanisms and aligning with its core principles to ensure AI is implemented ethically and securely: Ethics and Accountintelligence and security Internal use Policy and legal Internal use Internal use Scientific Corporate and enability : Oversight of AI initiatives will be managed through a dedicated governance framework, including a new internal governance body to provide strategic direction, monitor AI initiatives and adoption, and ensure ethical and consultation considerations are addressed as the Agency adopts and integrates AI technologies. This will ensure that all AI has human oversight and will not replace human decision-making. Employee Consultation, Safety and Wellbeing : As both a regulator and an employer, the FWO is committed to ensuring that it consults with its employees about the potential use of AI in the workplace and that AI enhances workplace safety and wellbeing in addition to supporting the services we deliver. The Agency prioritises the responsible and ethng Internal use Internal use www.fairwork.gov.au Page 2 Governance To ensure appropriate AI governance, oversight and leadership, the Agency has established designated accountability roles including that of the: • AI Accountable Official (AO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Agency’s designated AI Accountable Officialuse of AI to support our employees to do the valua(AO), responsiblewforkthey provide to our community in a way that enhances our productivity and efficiency. We aim to be an employer that uses AI in our work in a manner that fulfils the objective of harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. 3 Caution and Proactivity: The Agency is taking a cautious yet proactive approach to AI adoption, focusing on gradual integration. This involves addressing risks and building internal expertise to create a sustainable and impactful AI framework. Privacy: The Agency is committed to ensuring that we maintain the trust of employers, employees, their representatives and our own employees in relation to our handling of personal information. Our AI governance framework will follow best practice guidance on the use of commercially available AI productimplementation and oversight of AI initiatives. • Chief AI Officer (CAIO): The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Regulatory Transformation Group Manager share the role of Chief AI Officer (CAIO), providing strategic leadership, and helping drive AI adoption and cultural change within the Agency. Monitoring AI-related risks are managed through the Agency’s existing risk management procedureson using personal information to train AI products published by the Office of the Australian Information Commission. Cyber Security: All AI initiatives will align with government security standards, including the Protective Security Policy Framework and Information Security Manual, to continue safeguarding sensitive data, our systems and ensure compliance with cyber security practices. In the coming year, the Agency will focus on the following key activities to support our adoption of AI: ● Governance and Oversight : Theprotocols and executive oversight. The following measures enable us to actively monitor the effectiveness and safety of AI technologies: • Risk assessment s: We apply Agency risestablishing governance mechanisms to ensure transparency, monitor AI initiatives and adoption, and evaluate ethical considerations and consult with our workk management processes to evaluate proposed AI systems and AI capabilities, taking into consideration, privacy, security, and operational risks beforce andstakeholders. These mechanisms will guide AI implementation, outline how we will undertake risk assessments, and provide a governance framework for responsible and ethical AI use. ● AI Use Case Exploration : Initial efforts will focus on internal AI applications in workplace productivity and data insights using controlled pilot projects. The Agency will develop internal policies to guide AI use, provide training to build staff capability, and evaluate the potential of AI to streamline processes while maintaining ethical safeguards. AI Acafter deployment. • Executive oversight: The AO provides high -level oversight of the Agency’s AI adoption to ensure it remains within the Agency's risk appetite and aligns with whole -of-government policy. • Human oversight: The effectiveness of AI outputs is countable Official The FWO has appointed the Chief Information Officer as the AI Accountable Official responsible for: ● overseeing the development and implementation of AI initiatives within the Agency, ● ensuringinually monitored by authorised staff using the AI systems and AI capabilities. Compliance The Agency is compliancet with the DTA’s Policyand other relevant frameworks, ● providing strategic oversightfor Responsible Use onf AIgovernance and risk management, and ● acting as a key liaison for whole-of-government AI collaboration. 4 Artificial Intelligence definition When discussing AI, the Agency applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development definition: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.in Government 2.0. We have established a strategic approach to AI adoption, which will be formalised with the Agency’s AI Strategy 2026–27 and AI Governance Framework in March 2026. Reviews,Uupdates, andCcontactIinformation This transparency statement was last updated on 287 February 20256.The FWO is committed to ensuring transparency as AI adoption evolves. This transparency statemenIt willannually or whenever there areonce a year • when making a significant changesto the Agency’'sAI use, governance framework or relevant government policiesapproach to AI • when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. For anyienquiries or comments regarding this statement, please complete our Feedback formntact us at aiqueries@fwo.gov.au.Finance rewrites its statement: appoints a Chief AI Officer, discloses GovAI Chat and PROTECTED-level Copilot use, and drops its low-risk-only limit and public-interaction safeguard.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief AI Officer appointed (FAS, AI Delivery and Enablement Division), co-chairing the AI Governance Committee with a single Accountable Official
- Removed: the definition of low risk, including the commitment that AI does not directly interact with or significantly impact the public without human intervention
- Removed: statement that Finance has chosen to limit its AI use to low-risk use cases
- New disclosure of GovAI and Finance's operation of GovAI Chat, a whole-of-APS generative AI tool
The words that changed
… itted to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI).ssignificant opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery within our workplace. We govern our AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy) and best practice. ## Our approach to AI At Finance, we are applying the guidance outlined in DTA’s Pilot [Australian Government AI assurance framework ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework)(the Framework) and have chosen to limit our use of AI to low-risk use cases. This guidance implementshile preserving accountability, transparency and public trust. As a central agency, we provide high quality advice, frameworks and services to achieve value in the management of public resources for the benefit of all Australians. As the lead agency responsible for key initiatives under the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/at-a-glance), we aim to lead by example in the responsible adoption and use of AI across government, supported by strong governance, clear accountability and transparency. ## Our approach to AI The AI Delivery and Enablement (AIDE) function within Finance is responsible for driving the delivery of the APS AI Plan, accelerating AI adoption across the APS, addressing common barriers and monitoring AI implementation, coordinating the APS network of Chief AI Officers and developing metrics for successful AI adoption and use. The [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) project directly supports this approach by providing a secure, APS-only environment for exploring AI tools, experimenting safely with AI and data, and sharing early use cases and lessons learned across government. Finance is using this platform to develop and operate [GovAI Chat](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/tools), a secure general purpose AI tool designed to expand access to generative AI across the APS in a controlled and secure environment. In the use of AI within Finance, we follow whole-of-government policy and support our staff in low-risk use cases, building our internal AI capability as well as the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy). We also apply [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/public … ntelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and usesthe [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD)](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles)concepts to define AI anddefinitions to help identify which of our systems usesAI. We assess the risk of each use case against 7 criteria and a risk matrix outlined in [the framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework). These are: - fairness - reliability and safety - privacy protection and security - transparency and explainability - contestability - accountability - human-centered values. This assessment determines if a use case is low, medium, or high risk. A low-risk use case means AI does not: - directly interact with, or significhen we consider our use of AI, we apply the DTA’s [Pilot AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework), the [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) and the [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/department) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguards in place. ### How we measure the effectiveness of our AI We monitor AI adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and AI-related incidents to assess effectiveness and inform updates to our governance settings, guidance and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. Our AI solutions are approved centrally, with risks managed at the enterprise level. This includes standing approvals for low-risk uses, such as using Microsoft 365 Copilot to draft emails with information classified up to OFFICIAL. Our staff use AI to support everyday work, including making documents accessible, supporting policy antalyimpact the public without human intervention - risk the security of the information or data we hold - harm the privacy of any individual, including our staff. We reassess our use cases when: - a notablsis, summarising information, analysing data, answering policy and process questions, drafting and reviewing content, writing and debugging code, and preparing meeting minutes and transcripts. If staff want to use AI beyond these central approvals, they must complete an AI impact assessment and register their use as required by the DTA’s Policy. We assess AI solutions and compare against criteria drawn from [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). Each assessment is rated low, medium or high which helps us decide if the AI use case change is made to our approach to AI or use of AI - a use case progresses to another stage in its life cycle - an AI risk or harm is identified with a use case. Any use case rebe used and what extra controls might be needed. We won’t approve AI solutions or uses that still carry a medium or high level of risk after safeguards are applied. Where residual risk remains uncertain or insufficiently understood, deployment is deferred until risks can be appropriately mitigated. Any proposal assessed asbeinghigh riskwill beis also reported to the DTA. ## How we use AI We allow our staff to use AIin their work with the objective of enhancingto improve productivity andservicehelp delivery. This includes enterprise AI deployed in our closedthe advice, frameworks and services that Finance provides to government and other agencies. Finance provides staff with access to AI tools in two ways. In our internalICTenvironmentlik, staff can use Microsoft 365 Copilot,as well as publicly available AI like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini that is that is not deployed in our closed internal ICT environwhich operates within Finance’s Protected network and can be used with information up to PROTECTED, subject to our internal governance arrangements.The tasks completed by our staff usingStaff use public generative AIfaltoolsintoseveral usage patterns and domains as outlined by the DTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/senhance productivity and support their core responsibilities/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf). These are: - the _Analytics and insights_ usage pattern primarily in the _Scientific_ , and _Policy and legal_ domains, where the sensitivity of the data is low risk - the _Workplace productivity_ usage pattern primarily in the _Service delivery_ , and _Corporate and enabling_ domains. Our staff use AI to: - assist. When used outside Finance’s environment, only unclassified information up to OFFICIAL may be entered. Personal, sensitive or classified information must not be entered. Compliance with these requirements is monitored through our information security and governance frameworks. ### **Our AI patterns and domains** Finance classifies staff use of AI using thecreation of accessible versions of government documents, - assist with policy research and analysis - summarise data across multiple sources - interrogate, analyse and obtain insights from datasets - answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies, procedures and processes - assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documentsDTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are: · analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse information,emails or other content - create and debug code used in data analysis, management and processing - assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts - search information repositories and retrieve documents, information or datanly in the Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information · workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with routine tasks, mainly in the Service delivery and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within the_Decision making and administrative action_or_Image processing_usage patterns, or the_Compliance and fraud detection_, and_Law enforcement, intelligence and security_domains. ## How we govern our AIFinance has a risk-based approach to the use of AI. This approach focuses on identifying, evaluating and monitoring the level of risk associated with implementing AI systems. Once implemented, we monitor the effectiveness of our AI systems by: - having robust governance arrangements, puse We govern our internal AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the DTA’s Policiesy andprocesses; and - monitoring AI usagbest practice. ### **Our AI Governance Committee** We have established an AI Governance Committee (the Committee) to oversee our adoption and use of AI within Finance. The functions of this Committee include: - developing and implementing AI safely - identifying, assessing and managing AI risks and opportunities - promoting a culture of safe and responsible use of AI - overseeing and implementing policies and advice from the DTA. This Committee is co-chaired by two accountable officials (AIGC) as well as appointed an Accountable Official (AO) and a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to oversee how Finance adopts and uses AI across the department. The AIGC is jointly chaired by the AO)and CAIO, witsh membershipincludesdrawn from senior executiverepresentatives from the following areas: - Information Communication Technology Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary, Chief Information Officer and AO) - Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary and AO) - Budget Policy and Data Division - Corporate Strategy and Operations Division - Digital ID and Data Policy Division - Legal and Assurance Branch - Human Resources Branchs across the department. It supports safe and responsible AI use by providing oversight of key decisions, risks and controls for AI use at Finance. The functions of AIGC include: - promoting a culture of safe and responsible AI use across our workplace - monitoring, assessing and managing AI‑related risks and opportunities - overseeing and implementing policies and guidance from the DTA. ### **Our internal policies and processes** Finance has policies and processes for the adoption and use of AI by … ta policy - Privacy policy - Risk management policy framework. These policies and processes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain fit for purpose. We prov … is training prior to being granted access to our secure internal AI.### Our adherence to Whole of Australian Government AI policiesFinance isdedicacommitted to the fullyimplementing [ation of the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensuring ongoing compliance with [the Policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) Thisand to maintaining ongoing compliance. This commitment includes reviewing and updating this statement annually, orwhen new factors orsooner where there is a significant changesto ourAIapproachimpact it. Finance has implemented all mandatory requirements outlined within [the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), as demonstrated by the information contained within this statementto artificial intelligence. ## Who to contact regarding our statement For any questions regard … ement, or for more information about how Finance uses AI, please email:[feedback@finance.gov.au](mailto:feedback@finance.gov.au). ## Authorisation This statement is authorised by Finance’stwo aAccountableoOfficials, the First Assistant Secretaryof the, Information, Communication and Technology Division, and the Chief AI Officer, First Assistant Secretaryof the Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division. ______________________________________________________________________ Did you find this content useful? \_\_ \_\_ Your comments (if any) Page Submit Leave this field blank, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division.DEWR drops its pledge not to use AI in service delivery or decision-making, now discloses decision-support use and governance of third-party providers' AI.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: statement that AI is not used in service delivery, programs, compliance, auditing or decision-making
- New disclosure of AI supporting human decision making and administrative action, with a claim that it is not used for automated decision making
- New service delivery domain, including AI used by contracted third-party providers overseen by DEWR
- Adds Third-Party AI Assessment Framework and AI in Procurement Principles
The words that changed
# DEWR AI Transparency Statement The Department of Employment and Workplace Relationsis engaging with artificial intelligence (AI)(DEWR) recognises the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and is committed to adopting AI in a way that remains responsible, ethical, and aligned with public trust and expectations. We are using AI in a way that prioritises human rights, the protection of personal information, and is respecting of Indigenous data, while keeping humans at the centre of our decision-making.improve operational efficiency, andenhance productivity and elevate service delivery to support the broader goal of enabling people to have safe, secure, and … aid work with the skills for a sustainable future. ## On this page:We are committed to ensuring that AI enhances the effectiveness and quality of our services while maintaining the highest standards of ethics, safety, lawfulness, and public trust.DEWR use of AI is transparent, responsible, and aligned with legislati … Use of AI in Government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025) and the [Voluntary AI Safety Standard](https://www.industry.gov.au/pu … te, including through the use of machine learning. ## Monitoring andAaccountability DEWR’s AI initiatives are overseen by the AI Accountabl … ce: The department’s AI Adoption Committee oversees all AI initiatives deployed by the department, ensuring they align with DEWR’s strategic objectives and government standards.- EthicalThe Committee advises the AI Accountable Official in overseeing AI initiatives by third party providers such as employment service providers. - Ethical and Privacy Principles: AI development and deployment adhere to DEWR’sEthics FrameworkData, Digital and AI Ethics Policy and whole-of-government AI guidelines, embedding considerations like privacy, safety, lawfulness, transparency and fairness from the outset. Privacy assessments and data security considerations are embedded into the AI governance process, ensuring that the department’s AI tools maintain the privacy of Australians and that their use adheres to our privacy policy. - Human Oversight: Human-in-the-loop(HITL)mechanisms are embedded at critical stages to ensure accountability a … sed approach, to ensure the secure operation of all AI applications. The department engages with various third-party providers and has governance in place to ensure AI is used transparently, responsibly, and ethically. This includes: - A _Third-Party AI Assessment Framework_ that ensures that third-party providers contracted to deliver government services on behalf of government are effectively overseen by the department. - _AI in Procurement Principles_ in place that help to ensure where third-party providers are using AI as part of delivering services to the department, the risks have been considered, the usage is transparent to, and agreed to by the department, and that AI-aware quality assurance processes are in place. ## HowWweUuse AI DEWR uses AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corp … functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processesand, automating routine tasks. As part of its commitment to responsible AI use, DEWR i, and enabling new capabilities. DEWR uses AI to support service delivery, including using AI to ensure servicesparticipating in the Pilot Australian Government AI Assurance Framework to explore how AI can further optimise internal operations while adhering to ethical and governance standardse high quality and by developing AI-supported solutions to improve services. Where delivery of government services is contracted to third parties, DEWR remains accountable for the way these services are delivered and incorporates effective governance to ensure AI is used safely, responsibly, and ethically. ## UsagePpatterns DEWR employs AI in the following way: - WorkplacePproductivity: Use tools like automated document summarisation and virtu … tants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency. - Analytics forIinsights: Used to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis.DEWR does not currently use AI in service delivery or in how we administer programs delivered to the Australian public. Specifically, AI is not used in compliance, auditing, or decision-making processes- Supporting decision making and administrative action: Supporting human decision making or administrative action by guiding, assessing, or making a recommendation to a human decision maker. AI is not used for automated decision making. For more about usage patterns, see the [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) on the digital.gov.au website. ## Domains Our AI applications focus on: - Corporate and enabling services: supporting corporate functions, including HR, finance, media and comm … s, optimising resource allocation and improving operational efficiency, including research and innovation; and - Service delivery: enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of the government services DEWR delivers. This includes the delivery of services by contracted third party providers, which are overseen by DEWR to ensure safe, responsible, and ethical use of AI. For more about domains, see the [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) on the digital.gov.au website. ## EnsuringRresponsibleUuse DEWR safeguards against risks and ensures responsible AI use throughreleasinga range of governance mechanisms including privacy assessments, ethics assessments, cybersecurity assessments, clear approval processes, and monitoring. We release an annual AI Transparency Statement to provide visibility on how AI is used and managed. ## ContactIinformation For inquiries or feedback regarding DEWR’s use of AI, please contact us at [data[@dewr.gov.au](mailto:data@dewr.gov.au). ## Review andUupdatesThe ATO discloses new AI uses including intelligence gathering and image processing, drops its caveat that AI is not used for administrative action, and flags policy v2.0 work.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: parenthetical that AI is not used for administrative action
- Adds law enforcement, intelligence and security domain, including AI-enabled analysis for intelligence gathering
- Adds image processing usage pattern; new examples: identity-crime lodgment alerts, drafting public advice and guidance
- States compliance with policy v1.1 and commits to implementing v2.0 from 15 December 2025, plus a forthcoming standalone ATO AI policy
The words that changed
# ATO AI transparency statement See our public transparency statement outlining how we approach artificial intelligence (AI) in the ATO.**Published** 28 February 2025Print or Download ## How we define AI In the ATO, we use data and an … tExternal Link](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). We alsorefer toinclude any application of machine learning, deep learning and generative AI … , we are using AI in the: - usage patterns of analytics for insights, image processing, workplace productivity,and decision making and administrative action(note, we do not use AI for administrative action)- domains of service delivery, compliance and fraud detection,andcorporate and enabling, and law enforcement, intelligence and security.**Examples**of how we are applying AI in these domains: - service delivery - p … powering our virtual assistant Alex - managing call centre volumes - assisting with readability and structure of select public advice and guidance content - compliance and fraud detection - reviewing large quantities of uns … models to identify potential non-compliance or fraud for human review.- alert taxpayers to lodgments suspected of identity crime - corporate and enabling services - creating initial draft communications for review - summarising content - law enforcement, intelligence and security - supporting AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering. Under our AI policy, AI use is limited to approved tools used for approved use cases. We are currently expanding our use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technology for workplace productivity use. See [Examples of how we use AI](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/ato-ai-transparency-statement#ExamplesofhowweuseAI). ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, … lian community. The CDO is also our AI Accountable Official under the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_. Our existing D&A (including data governance and [ethics](https://ww … e continue to evolve our data governance as our D&A maturity increases. We are, expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. Ou … ulatory and policy frameworks, and all standard laws and frameworks. At time of publishing, the ATO is compliant with version 1.1 of the _AI in government policy_. Version 2.0 of the policy introduces new requirements from 15 December 2025, which we are committed to implementing. The ATO will soon release a standalone AI policy outlining specific obligations for staff when interacting with, using, or developing AI to support version 2.0 requirements. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change ourdatagovernance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to t … sibly and ethically. Decision making that adversely impacts taxpayers' rights will always be made by a human. Taxpayers have a [right of review](ht … regardless of the technology we use to help us make those decisions.Australian Government agencies are required to publish a transparency statement outlining their approach to adopting and using artificial intelligence (AI).We will review our AI transparency statement regularly and publish upd … ntrast, and formats. AI helps us produce better communications content,in less time and cost. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain_. QC103887 Print or DownloadASSEA moves from exploring AI to disclosing actual use of Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, narrows mandatory training to licensed staff, and flags a review against policy v2.0.
read by Claude Opus 5- Now discloses live use of Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (all staff) plus licensed Copilot for some staff, replacing 'exploring possible uses'
- Use classified into DTA domains: policy and legal, scientific, corporate and enabling
- Removed: mandatory AI training for all staff before using any AI tool — now mandatory only for Copilot licence holders, 'strongly encouraged' otherwise
- Adds DTA principles for public generative AI tools (protect privacy, assess outputs, own decisions)
The words that changed
… ernment. In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [ _Policy for responsible use of AI in government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), the following informat … ion for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [definition of AI:](https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en):> An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or impli … heir levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## UsageThe agency is currently exploring the possible ways of using AI appropriately for the following use cases and managing the risks they may impose, including the prioritisation of human rights, privacy and indigenous data sovereignty. Primarily AI usage willASSEA uses Generative AI to enhance workplace productivity and support corporate functions. These applications focus on streamlining internal processes and automating routine tasks. All Agency staff have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, and a limited number of staff have access to the licensed version. The use of AI within the Agency is aligned to ASSEA’s mandated functions as articulated in the _Asbestos and Silica Safety and Eradication Act 2013_ and ASSEA’s annual operational plan.## Analytics for insights We see the potential benefits in using AI to improve research and scientific outputs of the agency through: -ASSEA employs AI in domains (as defined by the [Digital Transformation Agency](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)) of policy and legal, scientific, and corporate and enabling, in the following ways: - Workplace Productivity: Use tools such as automated document summarisation and virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency. - Analytics for Insights: Used in generating and debugging code used in data analysis, management,andcreation of synthetic data for testing and validations-, and dashboard and report generation.## Workplace productivity We see potential benefits in using AI to improve workplace productivity for the agency. Those benefits include, but are not limited to: - managing and responding to general queries - document search and retrieval - insight generation - idea generation - summarisation of emails, documents, and other correspondence - task management - collation enhancement - formatting assistanceThe Agency is continuing to explore the possible ways of using AI appropriately to optimise resource allocation and improve operational efficiency, while managing the risks they may impose, including the prioritisation of human rights, privacy and indigenous data sovereignty. ### Public interaction and impact ASSEA does not propose to use AI whe … ly interact with or be significantly impacted by it. Furthermore, theaAgency maintains a commitment to ensure that any external provider serv … ning of AI models or software, and this will be incorporated into our procurement and request processes. ## Monitoring AI effectiveness and negative impactsExecutive monitoring The Executive and leadership teams have identified the associated risks of emerging AI technologies and their use in the workplace._**Oversight and monitoring**_ Governance policies areproactivelybeing developed to assess the unique potential use cases for AI in the duties of the Agency.and to identify associated risks of emerging AI technologies in the workplace. _**Responsible AI usage policy**_ As part of the governance of AI use in theaAgency, a responsible AI usage policywill beis in developedment to ensure alignment with the resources provided by the Digital Transformation Agency. Training and assistance, and our ICT provider, the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR). This policy will provide further clarification regarding expectations on staff, ensuring usage is safe, ethical, and responsible. In accordance with the DTA’s principles for using public generative AI tools responsibly, staff are to: - Protect privacy and safeguard government information - Use judgement and critically assess generative AI outputs - Be able to explain, justify, and take ownership of their advice and decisions _**Training and assistance**_ Training on the ethical and responsible usage of AIwill beis mandatory for all staff, before the usage of any AI tools within the agency. Staff will bwho have a Microsoft 365 Copilot license, and is strongly encouraged for general Copilot use. Staff with licenses are required to undergo refresher training on a regular basis as this technology,and its use within Government, advchancges. _**Compliance**_ Use of AI by theaAgencywill beis in accordance with all relevant legislation, associated regulations, and Government frameworks. ### Policy for the responsible use of AI in governmentAny future uUse of AIbywithin theaAgencybeis conducted with respect to all the mandatory requirements of the [Poli … 20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf). ### Accountable official The Chief Data Officer was designated as the accountable official on 01 September 2024. As the accountable official, the Chief Data Officer … xternal policies, and relevant regulations and legislation within theaAgency. At a minimum theaAgency will review annually the need to audit and/or review how AI has … sed to ensure alignment with intentions and compliance requirements. ### Review and Updates The AI transparency statement was first published to our website on 28 February 2025, and was updated on 26 February 2026, with minor amendments to reflect the current use of AI in the Agency.\ This statement is currently under broader internal review in alignment with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) and will be updated upon completion. This statement will continue to be reviewed annually,and updated if there are changes to the use of AI within the agency. ### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further information on theaAgency's usage of AI, please contact [enquiries@asbestossafety.gov.au](https://mailto:enquiries@asbestossafety.gov.au)ASIC's annual review rewrites the statement for the December 2025 policy, naming a chief AI officer and adding a use case register, impact assessment and mandatory staff training.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable official (SEL Data, Analytics and AI) now also named chief AI officer under the APS AI Plan 2025
- New internal AI use case register with accountable use case owners, per the Standard for accountability
- New commitment to integrate the DTA's AI impact assessment tool, with high-risk use cases reported to the DTA
- Mandatory APSC 'AI in government fundamentals' training for all staff to be implemented
The words that changed
… rnment") (the policy). The policy provides mandatory requirements for[accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials "Accountable officials") of government departments and agencies, and their [](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials)[transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements "Transparency statements")government departments and agencies. This page provides details of ASIC’s implementation of those require … currently using AI, as prescribed by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA): The table below demonstratscribes AI usageand patternsat ASIC.**Usage pattern**|**Description**\ ---|---\ Analytics for insights | Identifies patterns, produces insi … nd unstructured data\ Workplace productivity | Automates routine tasksand, helps manage workflows and supports staff with administrative activities\ Decision making and administrative action | Supports decision making … The table below demonstrates ASIC domains where AI is used at ASIC.**Domain**|**Description**\ ---|---\ Compliance and fraud detection | Supports identification an … public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by AI or its outputs, withoutahumanintermediary or interventionreview ASIC does not use AI in any manner that allows direct interaction wi … ment. ## Measures to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes ASIC currentlyand protect the public against negative impacts ASIC has governance structures and processes in place and is continuously developingothers. We are also building workforce capabilityse in alignment with whole-government initiatives. For example: ### ASIC’s AI policy Our AI policy sets organisationa … f AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). ###OurAI assuranceframeworkand risk management process We are participating in whole-of-government initiatives to develop an AI assuranceframeworkprocess comprising of AI controls, measurement and assessment, monitoring and reporting, roles and responsibilities. For our regulatory and enforcement activities, ASIC uses well-understood systems that have clear and proven benefits. Our risk-based approach is aligned to the [National framework for the assurance of AI in government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). ASIC’s data and AI governance practices include privacy, ethics, and security assessments. In all cases of AI use, human review or oversight is involved before any action is taken. ### AI boardAnOur AI board is the primary governance body for AI which oversees the design, development, deployment and use of AIbyin ASIC. This includes approval of AI use cases and making recommendations for improvements, risk mitigation, and ongoing monitoring and compliance. ### Foundational technologies We are investigating and adopting fit … the AI systems are interpretable, explainable and understandable. ### People capabilities WCompliance with theareimplementing role-based training programs for AI. We have also developed a series of organisation-wide AI training sessions to address our immediate needs. Data literacy is alsoquirements under the Policy for responsible use of AI in government ### AI accountable official and chief AI officer ASIC’s Senior Executive Leader, Data, Analytics and AI is the are capabiuntable official under the politcywithin ASIC’s learning and development syllabus. ## Efforts to identify and protect the public against negative impactsand the chief AI officer under the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-11/APS%20AI%20Plan%202025.pdf). ### Strategic position on AI adoption ASIC is currently developing a Data, Digital and AI Strategy which will outline ASIC’s strategic position ofn AIFor our regulatory and enforcement activities, ASIC uses well-understood systems that have clear and proven benefits. Our risk-based approach is aadoption. ### Internal AI use case register and use case accountability ASIC maintains an internal register of AI use cases that captures the minimum required fields outlignedto the Australian Government AI Assurance Framework. AI systems developed by our data analytics teams and procured from external partners are used within ASIC. These are describein [the Standard for accountability](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability). Each use case has a designated accountable use case owner. ### Operationalising the responsible use of AI and AI impact assessment ASIC has established an AI policy, AI boarduander the usage patterns and domains sectAI use case assessment that integrates all provisions of this statement. ASIC’s data and AI governance practices include privacy, ethics, and security assessments. In all cases of AI use, human review or oversight is involved before any action is taken. ## Accountable official ASIC’s Senior Executive Leader, Data, Analytics and AI is the accountable official under the policy. **Update publication date** | **Update comment**\ ---|---\ 28 February 2025 | Publication of first AI transparency statemente DTA’s AI impact assessment tool. This includes assessment of AI use cases by ASIC’s AI board and reporting of any high-risk use cases to the DTA. ASIC also has existing risk incident management processes which includes AI incidents. ### Staff training on AI ASIC will be implementing the Australian Public Service Academy’s (APSC) AI in government fundamentals as a mandatory training for all ASIC staff. In addition, we implement role-based training programs and a series of organisation-wide AI training sessions. Data literacy is also a core capability within ASIC’s learning and development syllabus. ## Updates and more information This transparency statement wascremost recently updated on 287 February 20256. It will be updated to reflect significant changes in our approach to … y](https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/contact-us#online?get/landingPage/). Update publication date | Update comment\ ---|---\ 28 February 2025 | Publication of first AI transparency statement\ 27 February 2026 | Reviewed to reflect the updated Policy for responsible use of AI released in December 2025The ACCC rewrites its statement to confirm it now uses AI, discloses several new internal uses, adds governance-board oversight and a promise to update if AI faces the public.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosed uses: automating routine tasks, editing and generating document drafts (except those subject to administrative review), proactive information retrieval for analysis
- Shifts from intending to use AI to stating it does use AI
- New commitment to update the statement if AI is used in any public interaction
- Names the ACCC Corporate Governance Board as having ultimate oversight of AI adoption
The words that changed
## On this page ## How we intend to use AI The ACCCsees the opportunity touses artificial intelligence (AI) in a safe and responsible way. We believe itcanwill contribute to the effective and efficient delivery of our objectivesforto benefit the Australian community, over time. In considering AI, we have adopted theOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [definition of AI](https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.htmldefinition of AI used in the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy): - An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or imp … ment. We are committed to building our AI capabilities and exploringourhow we useofAI to support the ACCC’s functions in a safe and responsible manner.Humans will be at the centre ofOur people will remain responsible for all oversight of tasks and decision making. When engaging with or using AI, we willalways honourmeet our commitments to the public, businesses, government and the courts, … ity, privacy, confidentiality, ethics and other legal obligations. Wewillmake risk-based decisions on its use. We will seek opportunities to: … ng documents, emails, and other content - transcribing interviews and preparing meeting notes - creating training material for staff -assisting staff in efficiently retrieving informationproactively seeking and retrieving information for analysis - automating routine tasks - editing or refining drafts of documents - generating drafts of documents, except those subject to administrative review. We are exploring a range of AI driven innovations and tools, to make sure we continuously improve our efficiency and effectiveness. ## Areas of AI application The domains used for AI applications fo … ompliance and fraud detection** - to assist with identifying patternsthe identification of patterns in records to help complyin records to help detect non-compliance with our lawsand regulationsor anti-competitive conduct. - **scientific** - to enhance the processing of complex datasets, to … y deploy AI as part of the ACCC’s direct interaction with the public,includingthrough the Infocentreand ScamWatchor ScamWatch. The ACCC will update this transparency statement if AI is used for any public interactions, including through other communication channels. For all internal uses of AI, our processes make sure that weust consider any potential impacts on thepublic, including businessescommunity. While AI may be used toassisthelp in various tasks, oversight and decision making remains in human hands. ## Governance and complianceur people will continue to be responsible for oversight and decision making. ## Complying with legislation and regulation While we use AI in limited ways to help our staff, our AI systems do not make decisions or take actions on their own. Our AI use complies with all relevant legislation and regulations, and we apply strong safeguards to protect personal information. ### Monitoring AI systems We have taken the following steps to moni … use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the policy) by: - designating accountability for implementing thise policy toanthe AI accountable official, the ACCC’s General Manager of Data and Intelligence -adoptpublishing an AI policyand procedure that reflectsthat aligns with theis policy and includes an established AI review and approval pathway for internal AI useof AI. This includes supporting infrastructure such as an AI register - estanding upblishing an internal working groupthat provides internal governance on the use of AIfor using AI to support the Corporate Governance Board - considering the potential risks of AI as part of our internal risk management- introducprocesses - mandating training,(supported by internally developed resources), for all ACCC staff regarding the use of AI in our work - the publication of this transparency statement. The ACCC Corporate Governance Board is our primary corporate governance body and has ultimate oversight for AI adoption across the agency. ### Review of this statement This statement was published in **February 20256**. It will be reviewed and updated: - at least once a year - when a …- Workplace Gender Equality Agencyfirst tracked
- Sport Integrity Australiafirst tracked
The words that changed
… ia.gov.au](mailto:AI.Accountable.Official@servicesaustralia.gov.au).This transparency statement was last updated on 10 October 2025.[ How we use Artificial Intelligence We’re using Artificial Intelligen …- Royal Australian Mintfirst tracked
- Organ and Tissue Authorityfirst tracked
- Office of the Special Investigatorfirst tracked
- Office of Parliamentary Counselfirst tracked
- Office of the Inspector-General of Aged Carefirst tracked
- National Library of Australiafirst tracked
- National Emergency Management Agencyfirst tracked
The words that changed
… ov.au) or see the details on the contact us page of the NBA website.Last updated: 13 Feb 2026Back to top- National Anti-Corruption Commissionfirst tracked
- Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsmanfirst tracked
- High Speed Rail Authorityfirst tracked
- Fair Work Ombudsmanfirst tracked
- Food Standards Australia New Zealandfirst tracked
Only page furniture changed: a duplicated on-page contents list and the "was this page useful" feedback form no longer appear in the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… r validation and task automation 1. Compliance 1. Review and ContactOn this page 1 - Our Approach to AI 2 - Robust AI Governance 3 - Consultation with the Veteran Community 4 - Adoption of AI in DVA 5 - Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation 6 - Compliance 7 - Review and ContactThis statement sets out the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) appr … ease contact us at [AI@dva.gov.au](mailto:AI@dva.gov.au). Back to topWas this page useful? YES NO Please tell us why you selected 'Yes'? It was well written The layout and style made it easy to read It was helpful to me The content makes sense Please tell us why you selected 'No'? It was poorly written The layout & style made it difficult to read It didn't help me The content wasn't clear enough for me Something else Leave this field blankUpdates to policy version 2.0, adds a section on its responsibility for the Australian AI Safety Institute, and softens "a small number of AI tools".
read by Claude Opus 5- New section disclosing the department is responsible for establishing the Australian AI Safety Institute, tied to the National AI Plan
- References Policy for the responsible use of AI in government Version 2.0 instead of the 1 September 2024 commencement
- Drops 'small number of AI tools' in favour of 'a number of AI tools'
- Removed: hyperlinks to DTA guidance on accountable officials and transparency statements
The words that changed
# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 20256 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](h … formation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)came into effect on 1 September 2024. It has a set ofsets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about[accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials)and[transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements … olicy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AIWe use a smallOur approach uses a number of AI toolsand functions to improto deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more co … ts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capa …- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commissionfirst tracked
The words that changed
… at data[@dewr.gov.au](mailto:data@dewr.gov.au). ## Review and UpdatesThis AI Transparency Statement was last updated on 28 February 2025. It will be reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur.- Asbestos and Silica Safety and Eradication Agencyfirst tracked
Rewrites its statement entirely: names the Accountable Official and tools, promises a Chief AI Officer in 2026, adds training, governance and a contact address.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names the Manager, Data & Digital Solutions as Accountable Official
- Commits to appointing a Chief AI Officer during 2026 (to lead AI transformation at Treasury)
- Names tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, plus permitted public gen-AI tools
- Adds mandatory APSC AI in Government Fundamentals course and internal training before using enterprise AI tools
The words that changed
The Australian Office of Financial Management is engaging with artificial intelligence (AI) in a way that allows us to discover and adapt to new opportunities and practices, while keeping humans at the centre of our decision-making. Our intention is to leverage AI to drive innovation, improve operational efficiency, and support the broader goal of managing the government’s debt portfolio. ## **How we use AI** We currently us**Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the AOFM** The AOFM is exploring the benefits of emerging technologies such as AI. The AOFM follows the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) which provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This page contains AOFM’s AI transparency statement and outlines progress against the outcomes in the [AIto assist in workplace productivity. These applications focus on streamlining pPlan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.). **Key roclesses, automating routine tasks and demonstrating best-practice approaches. ## **Usage patterns and domains** The AOFM does not currently** The AOFM has designated the Manager, Data & Digital Solutions as the Accountable Official for artificial intelligence (AI) use within the department. Accountable Officials are responsible for implementing the [policy for the responsible use of AI inservice delivery. AI is not used in compliance, auditing or decision-making without having a human-in-the-loop. ## **Ensuring responsible usegovernment](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) will be appointed during 2026. As part of the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025#:~:text=The%20plan%20provides%20the%20platform,Officers%20working%20to%20promote%20adoption.), the CAIO will lead AI transformation at Treasury. **AI Adoption** The AOFM receives information and communication technology (ICT) services from the Department of Treasury.Internally, the AOFM Operations Committee has oversight of the use of AI productsTreasury’s endorsed AI products for staff use are Microsoft 365 Copilot and Microsoft Copilot Chat. Treasury permits use of some publicly available AI tools in line withintheagency. ## **Protecting the public against negative impacts** The AOFM has safeguards in place to mitigate risks and support responsible use of AI. The AOFM publishes an annual AI Transparency Statement to provide visibility on how we use and manage AI within our agency. ## **Compliance with the policy for the responsible use ofDigital Transformation Agency’s [staff guidance on public generative AI.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai) Enterprise AI tools are piloted based on business needs. AOFM’s current use of AI is classified as workplace productivity, with the aim over time to leverage AI to enhance our operational efficiency. **Public Interaction with AI** The AOFM does not use AI in ways that that involve direct interaction with the public, and decisions are not made by AI. All use of AI at the AOFM has human oversight. **Governance of AI** Appropriate governance arrangements have been established to support AI within the AOFM. The Australian Public Service Commission’s AI ingGovernment** The AOFM has gained comFundamentals course is available for all staff and is mandatory under the APS AI pliance with the Policy by nominat. As a prerequisite to utilising Enterprise AI tools, staff are required to complete internal trainingaonaccountable official to the Digital Transthe use of AI. The AOFM complies with all applicable legislation and regulations, including the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) and InformationAgencSecurity Manual (ISM). The use of AI is governed by Treleasing this Statement. This Statement was last updated in February 2025. ## **Updating the Statement** The AOFM’s Sasury’s IT Acceptable Use Policy, AOFM’s Information Security Policy, and the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). **Update Frequency** AOFM’s transparency statementwill beis reviewed and updated at the earlinnually or whenever significant changestof these junctures: - 28 February 2026 - when making a significant change to our approccur. The most recent update was on 28 February 2026 For further enquiries, please contacht to AI, or - when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracyhe AOFM at [enquiries@aofm.gov.au](mailto:enquiries@aofm.gov.au).- Australian Law Reform Commissionfirst tracked
Discloses two new AI uses --- coding assistants and Azure text-to-speech for training materials --- alongside existing security monitoring, and logs the December 2025 update.
read by Claude Opus 5- New disclosure: AI coding assistants for development, configuration and testing, limited to digital specialists with mandatory testing before implementation
- New disclosure: Azure AI Text to Speech used to produce internal training materials from human-written scripts
- States no direct public access to the security monitoring AI or coding-assistant-supported systems
- Changelog entry added for 20 December 2025; initial release date corrected to 27 February 2025
The words that changed
… icy requirements. ### Scope and Usage Currently, the Office uses AIto sfor the following activities: 1. Support security monitoring of its ICT systems.The Office has recentlyNo direct public access. 1. AI Assistants to support code completion and programming. This AI is used to assist with developing, configuring, maintaining and testing commercial software the Office uses. Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The use of these AI Coding Assistants is only for approved use cases of the Office’s system. All Human and AI assisted coding and system development, must undergo testing to ensure accuracy before being implement as part of the Office technical change management processes. The public does not currently access systems that are supported by these tools. 1. Use of Azure AI Text to Speech to support the creation of internal training materials based on a precise human generated text script. Access is limited to digital specialists with suitable ICT and Data skills. The Office has also completed pilots of two Microsoft AI capabilities – Microsoft Co-Pilot and Microsoft Azure AI services.5/317437/9/288236/OMB1188-Automated-Decision-Making-Better-Practice-Guide-March-202Report_Final-A1898885.pdf). ### Governance **AI Governance**\ Each AI use case and AI te … ief Information Officer are the designated AI Accountable Officials.______________________________________________________________________**Transparency Statement Updates**\ This statement will be reviewed an … ______________________________________ **Date**| **Note**\ ---|---\ 267 February 2025| Initial release.\ 20 December 2025| Add AI Assistant for Code Completion and Programming Usage and Text to Speech for training materials. [1] [Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI …The words that changed
… ase contact the [OAIC directly.](https://www.oaic.gov.au/contact-us) This statement was last reviewed on 24 January 2026. Did you find this helpful? ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) for responsible AI use sets mandatory requirements for the National Health Funding Body's accountable official and transparency statement. - Background The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for th … 0the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf). ##TAI transparencySstatement ### Why we use AI The National Health Funding Body (NHFB) s … f AI you can contact our AI Accountable Official as follows: Email: [nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au](mailto:nhfb.enquiries@nhfb.gov.au) Postal Address: National Health Funding Body\ Attn: AI Accountable Official\ GPO Box 1252\ CANBERRA ACT 2601\ Australia Fri, 2025-02-28 12:00 Skip to main content - [About us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us "About us") - [Our visionWho we are](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/strategic-overview "Our vision") - [Our purposewho-we-are "Who we are") - [What we do](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/our-mission "Our purposewhat-we-do "What we do") - [Stakeholders and partners](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/stakeholders-and-partners "Stakeholders and partners") - [NHR Agreement](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/nhr-agreement "NHR Agreement") - [Our teams](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/ou … gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure "Organisational structure")- [NHR Agreement](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/nhr-agreement "NHR Agreement")- [Corporate governance](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance "Corporate governance")- [Artificial Intelligence](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance/ai-transparency-statement "Artificial Intelligence") - [Freedom of information](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/compliance-reporting/freedom-information "Freedom of information") - [Senate Orders and directions](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/about-us/compliance-reporting/senate-orders-and-directions "Senate Orders and directions")- [Contact us](https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/contact-us "Co …Replaces its "no AI in use" statement with a full disclosure of Copilot Chat, AI contact-centre transcription, planned LLM document annotation, governance and a new contact address.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: claim that the Commission does not use AI internally or externally
- Discloses Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for staff productivity
- Discloses cloud contact platform using AI speech, transcription and sentiment analysis
- Flags planned LLM annotation of complaints, incidents and audit reports from late February 2026
The words that changed
**February 2025** The Digital Transformation Agency's [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) (the Policy) sets out the Australian Government’On this page: The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our vision to uphold the rights of people with disability and ensure safe, high-quality services across Australia, now and into the future. The NDIS Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) to ensure our AI use is safe, ethical, and transparent. _“AI refers to machine-based systems that analyse data, generate insights, and support decision-making in health and welfare contexts. These systems infer patterns from structured and unstructured data to produce outputs such as predictions, classifications, recommendations, or automation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight.”_ The NDIS Commission will comply with mandatory requirements under the DTA’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, including strategic oversight, operational preparedness, and impact assessment for AI use cases, to ensure our AI practices remain safe, ethical, and transparent. ## Use of AI by the NDIS Commission At this time, the NDIS Commission is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. As approach to embracerequisite to using AI tools, NDIS Commission staff are required to complete internal training on theopportunities of AI while ensuring that use is safe and responsible. Transparency isuse of AI. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We classify our AI use according to [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our current and proposed use focuses on the following usage patterns and domains. The table below represents AI usage patterns at the NDIS Commission: Usage Pattern| Descriptical to building public trust and is an important aim of the Policy and the broader APS Reform agenda. An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Currently, the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (NDIS Commission) does not use AI in services or advice we provide externally (publicly) or internallyon\ ---|---\ Analytics for insights| Identifying patterns and producing insights using data analysis and modelling.\ Workplace productivity| Automating routine tasks, assisting with document drafting and summarising content.\ Decision making and administrative action| Informing performance and productivity improvement. No regulatory decisions are made by AI. The table below illustrates how the AI usage patterns are applied within the domains where AI is used at the NDIS Commission: Domain| Description\ ---|---\ Service delivery| Supporting clear communication and timely responses.\ Compliance and fraud detection| Identifying anomalies to support compliance activities.\ Policy and legal| Assisting analysis and assurance in policy development and legal research.\ Scientific| Processing complex datasets to inform monitoring and research.\ Corporate and enabling| Improving internal operations (e.g. Finance and ICT) AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection, or employment related decision making. ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We will closely monitor AI-enabled tools through governance processes, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. We continue to evolve our data governance as our maturity increases. We are expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. The NDIS Commission will adhere to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Version 2.0), ensuring safe and ethical AI governance. This commitment includes strategic adoption, operationalising responsible practices, clear accountability, and risk-based oversight. The policy is dynamic and will evolve alongside technological advancements, emerging best practices, and regulatory developments. ## Our Commitment The NDIS Commission is committed to using AI in a safe, responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives align with the APS values, AI Ethics Principles and are central to the public’s best interest. We will: - Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks, and best practice standards. - Continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable guidelines and new insights as they emerge. - Review this statement annually or when significant changes occur in our AI approach. ### Safe and Responsible AI Adoption We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly for the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. Our internal policies and guidance will align with the DTA’s Policy and emerging government standards, including mandatory guardrails for high-risk settings. These policies will cover governance, ethical use, security, record keeping, risk mitigation, and staff responsibilities. They will apply to all employees and contractors. ## Examples of how we use AI The NDIS Commission currently uses AI in the following system use cases, including: ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat: By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, the NDIS Commission is enhancing staff productivity. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, assist in drafting emails and reports, and assist with data analysis, with staff responsible for reviewing and finalising content. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain. ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing customer service through the adoption of a secure cloud‑based contact platform. This platform uses AI‑enabled speech and transcription functions to: - Convert written text to spoken language. - Transcribe audio conversations. - Assess customer sentiment.WThen the NDIS Commission implements AI capability, we will update this statement in accordance with the Policy. This statement will also be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statementse capabilities enable the NDIS Commission to gain actionable insights, improve service quality, and optimise communication workflows. The result is a strengthened client experience, achieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain. ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently scheduled for late February 2026. This AI use-case involves deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process text documents, such as Complaints, Reportable Incidents, Audit Reports, etc. Our use of LLMs within this processing is limited to annotation of documents with summary information that supports further analysis. No regulatory decisions are made by the model, nor do the models make recommendations on possible regulatory actions. Information is processed in a secure internal environment. Examples of use include the following: - Identifying specific risk-indicators, such as a description within a Complaint indicating that a Participant was physically injured or that the Participant is a child. - Categorisation with regard to main topics or themes. - Extraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that are relevant to a user’s search, may be presented in a summary or detailed views used by regulatory officers as part of an assessment or investigation, and/or may be used as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis. ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via publicly accessible services; however, the NDIS Commission does not use browser-based AI to make, automate, or determine regulatory or compliance decisions. ## Updates and more information This transparency statement was created in February 2026. It will be updated to reflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [CIOAI@ndiscommission.gov.au](mailto:CIOAI@ndiscommission.gov.au).Rewrites its statement from "we use no AI" to disclosing four generative AI tools, new safeguards, use classifications and a dedicated AI email contact.
read by Claude Opus 5- Now discloses active AI use: GovAI Multi-Model, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot via GovTEAMS and GitHub Copilot, with commencement dates
- Removed: statement that the NBA does not use AI in any of its services
- Adds commitment that a human assesses all AI outputs and AI will not be used for decision-making
- Adds classifications (analytics for insights, workplace productivity) and four usage domains
The words that changed
Our AI transparency statement explains how we intend to use AI technology, and how we will adopt and use AI in line with the Australian public's and Government's expectations. The National Blood Authority’s (NBA) commitment to the safe and responsible use of AI supports our vision to save and improve Australian lives and patient outcomes through a world-class blood supply. The Digital Transformation Agency'’s[ _(DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AIrtificial Intelligence (AI) in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/ … 0the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) setsouta framework for the Australian Governmentapproach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. The National Blood Authority (NBA) is committed to identifying ethical, responsible and meaningful use when considering the adoption of AI capabilities. We will be transparent as we explore, adopt and integrate AI technology to benefit staff and external stakehol’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. Along with the [Standard for AI transparency statements(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). **Why we use AI** To achieve our vision to save and improve Australian lives and patient outcomes through a world-class blood supply in delivering better health and wellbeing for all Australians, the NBA commits to the safe and responsible adoption of AI to take advantage of the various benefits the technology providers.Currently, t**How we use AI** The NBAdousesnot use AI in any services we provide. We are in thegenerative AI in line with the DTA’s [Classification systems for use(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) as below: We use AI to enhance: _Analytics for insights_ Identifies, producessof exploring the potential appropriate use of AIr understands insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting the NBA context, the risks that will need to be managed, and the benefits it may bring. If the NBA implements any AI capability, this statement will be updated to outline our use including: - the intentions behind why the NBA is using AI or is considering its adoption - classification1 of AI use according to usage patterns and doools. _Workplace productivity_ Automates routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication. We may apply AI in the following domains: Domain| Description\ ---|---\ Service delivery| Enhances efficiency or accuracy of government services, by providing tailored and responsive services to the public and/or stakeholders.\ Policy and legal| Analyses policies and legal documents to provide advice and assurance on their impact and supports policy development that is consistent with existing laws.\ Scientific| Leveraged in scientific endeavours to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes and enhance monitoring functions.\ Corporate and enabling| Supports corporate functions, including HR, finance, media and communications, and IT, by automating processes, optimising resource allocation and improving operational efficiency. **Our approach with AI** A human will assess all AI outputs to ensure accuracy. We will not use AI for decision makins - classification1 of useg purposes. The NBA isn’t using AI applications where the publicmaycan directly interact with,or besignificantlyimpacted by,AIwith. We will update this transparency statement if outr ahuman intermediary or intervention - measures to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems, such as governance or processes - complipproach changes. **Our commitment** The NBA is committed to using AI in a responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives will align with the APS values and have the publics’ best interest at heart. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable: - legislationand- regulations -efforts to identify and protect the public against negative impacts - compliance with each requirement under the [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/dframeworks - policies - best practice. **Safe and responsible AI adoption** We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. These will align with the DTA’s Policy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop internal policies and guidance materials when necessary for: - AI Governance and approval processes - acceptable use of AI in the NBA - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - record keeping - security, procurements/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)_._ **Accountable official** The Chief Information Officer is designatedof AI systems - risk mitigation and technical guardrails - roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internal policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. We will update this transparency statement as theacNBA countable official. **AI transparency statement** This AI transparency statement was first published to our website in January 2025. This statement will be reviewed annually, or when we make any significant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. **Contact Us** If yinues to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology. **AI systems we use** What we use| How we use| Commenced\ ---|---|---\ GovAI Multi-Model| We use the GovAI platform as a secure space for staff to test AI models and to support staff learning. | January 2026\ Microsoft 365 Copilot| We use Microsoft 365 Copilot within the NBA controlled environment.| February 2026\ Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS| We use Microsoft Copilot in the secure GovTEAMS environment.| January 2026\ GitHub| We use GitHub Copilot for software development.| February 2026 **Privacy notice for Microsoft Teams recordings and transcripts** [Click here to find out havow we many enquiries about this statement, we can be reached via the details on [contact us](https://www.blood.gov.au/contact-us) page of this website [1] As per the [Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)age the personal information we collect about you when you attend an MS Teams meeting that we record and transcribe.](https://www.blood.gov.au/privacy-notice-microsoft-teams-recordings-and-transcripts) **Contact** The Chief Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official for the NBA. For questions about this statement or the NBA’s use of AI, you can email [ai@blood.gov.au](mailto:ai@blood.gov.au) or see the details on the contact us page of the NBA website. Last updated:07 Jan13 Feb 20256 Back to topNational Archives names a Chief AI Officer, changes its accountable official, expands the AI uses disclosed and adds a no-decision-making, no-public-interaction commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- Assistant Director-General Technology named Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer
- Accountable official changed from ADG Technology/CIO to Chief Information and Data Governance Officer
- New commitment: no AI in decision-making processes or public interaction
- New uses disclosed: transcription and content extraction, description extraction and enhancement, open access document summarisation
The words that changed
… nt aim of the policy and broader APS Reform agenda. National Archivesof Australia (National Archives)is dedicated to ongoing refinement and enhancement of our AI capabili … I, the technology environment and Government policy requirements. ##AccountablChief Artificial Intelligence Officialer The National Archives’' Assistant Director-General,Technology, as Chief Informationis the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer, responsible for leading organisational change and innovation, accelerating AI capability development and identifying opportunities for AI to enhance efficiency, policy and resource allocation. ## Accountable Official The National Archives' Chief Information and Data Governance Officer,is the accountable official for Artificial Intelligence within Archiv … . ## Governance The National Archives _Access to publicly availableAI (Artificial Intelligence) from NAA systemspolicy_ , outlines our principles, our risk tolerance, and the approval process for business use of publicly available AI. The Archivesseeks to leverage our existing governance bodies and utiliuses the Information and Data Governance Committee (IDGC) for consideration of AI business cases. National Archives has processes to ensure: - our AIthat our: - AI access and use is appropriately governed- ourand monitored – AI tools and users are registered - engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible- our stakeholders have trust in our use of AI - our risks are identified and addressed - our AI access and usage is monitored. ## Use of AI by National Archives National Archives is using AI internally in a limited fashion for business purposes– AI tools are Cyber assessed and staff are trained - staff have the knowledge and capability to use AI appropriately – mandatory AI training is implemented - stakeholders have trust in our use of AI – all use of AI is declared, and - risks are identified and addressed – all specific business use cases include risk and ethics assessments. ## AI use by National Archives according to usage patterns and domains National Archives is using AI only in the corporate and enabling domain, focussing onpilotsrefining ways of working. We do not use AI in any external services or advice we provide to the public. The primary use cases for internal AI adoption centre relate to: - text summarisation - ideation - review of non-sensitive outputs. ## Review The National Archives will continue to update this transparency statement to reflect implementation and adoption of AI technology.and trialling AI functionality that enhances archival processes. We do not use AI in any decision-making processes or public interaction, and all possible efforts are taken to protect the public against negative impacts. The primary use cases for internal AI relate to: - open access document text summarisation - transcription and content extraction - description extraction and enhancement - ideation, and - text review and refinement. This AI use is supported by business cases that seek to improve processes or productivity. This includes general staff access to approved AI tools. Internal measures have been put in place to mitigate risk and monitor effectiveness. ## Review This statement will be reviewed annually, when making a significant ch … r when any new factors impact this statement. For further enquiries,please [contact us through our [online contactusform](https://www.naa.gov.au/visit-us/contact-us#email-us). ## Authorisation Authorised by:\ Assistant Director-General, Technology\Chief Information Officer\ Chief Information Security Officer\ 2 Jul7 January 20256The words that changed
… Orders for Entity Contracts: [Senate Order for Entity Contracts - 1 Julanuary 20245 to 30 June1 December 2025](https://www.igis.gov.au/sites/default/files/20256-082/Senate%20Order%20for%20Entity%20Contracts%20%E2%80%93%201%20Julanuary%2020245%20to%20301%20JuneDecember%202025.PDF) ## Legal Services Expenditure Directions from the Attor …Only the site's breadcrumb navigation changed, gaining an extra Geoscience Australia link; the statement text is untouched.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# AI transparency statement Page last updated:3 March 2025 [Home](https://www.ga.gov.au/home) [Geoscience Australia](https://www.ga.gov.au) > [About](https://www.ga.gov.au/about) > [Corporate documents](https: …Italicises and corrects the two Act titles and updates the "last updated" date to 3 February 2026, with no change of substance.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… Commission **will not** use generative AI to make decisions under the _Fair Work Act 2009_ or _Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009_. The power to make such decisions can only be exercised by an appropr … ficant change to our approach to AI as outlined above. Last updated:283 February 20256 You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. ## How useful wa …The words that changed
[ Listen ](https://app-oc.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=13793&lang=en_au&readid=main-content&url=https%3A%2F%2F//www.education.gov.au%2F/about-department%2F/corporate-reporting%2F/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement "Listen to this page … ents for the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/policy/ai). ## What we won’t use AI for The department currently does not all …DVA rewrites its statement, disclosing several new AI tools and a claims document reader trial, adding a consultation section, and dropping its annual review commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- New tools disclosed: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, Semantic Text Analysis of MyService claim responses, licensed Copilot trial
- New voluntary, consent-based Proof of Concept Claims Document Reader trial built on the GovAI platform, with decisions still made by DVA delegates
- Says designation of a Chief AI Officer is being formalised, alongside the existing AI Accountable Official (October 2024)
- Removed: commitment to review and update the statement annually or on significant change
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 9OctoberFebruary 20256 ## On this page 1. Our Approach to AI 1. Robust AI Governance 1. Consultation with the Veteran Community 1. Adoption of AI in DVA 1. Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation 1. Compliance 1. Review and Contact On this page 1 - Our Approach to AI 2 - Robust AI Governance 3 - Consultation with the Veteran Community 4 - Adoption of AI in DVA45 - Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automation56 - Compliance 7 - Review and Contact This statement sets out the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) ap … chnology in accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA)\[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI inai/ai-in-governmentv1.1.pdf-policy). Back to top ## Our Approach to AIAt DVA, we are dedicated toDVA is modernisingourits technology systems to ensure veterans and their familieshareceive timely, accessto support andible and high‑quality services. This includesidentifyexploring opportunities toenhance and automate through the application of technology, including safe and responsible use of AI to improve our processes, modernise our digital services, and drive improvemimprove and streamline services through the safe and transparentsand innovations that ensure we provide a connected and accessible veteran support system. AI is a fast-changing technology set that has greatdoption of AI technologies. We recognise that AI is a rapidly evolving technology with the potential toimprovenhance operations andenhance services provided by the department. It is a transformative technology that wservice delivery. We will engage with AI carefullyand, transparently, as we explore how we can safely and ethically use it to improve outcomes for the veteran community. We are committed to transparently working with veterans on how AI could be used to better support their needs. We are also committed to engaging with our employees. Back to top ## Robust AI Governance DVA is finalising an AI Policy that incorporates thend in ways that build trust across the veteran community and our workforce. Back to top ## Robust AI Governance DVA’s AI Policy sets out principles,approach torisk,approaches and approvalconsiderations to helpprocesses to guideourAI investigation, evaluation and implementationof AI, including our adoption of suitable, robust AI governance. We will continue to be guided by Australian Government policies, frameworks and guidelines around AI as well as industry best-pra. Our governance approach aligns with Australian Government policies, frameworks and industry best practice. All DVA staff undertake mandatory training on AI fundamentals, privacy and data protecticeon.As pUnder the DTA’s \[Policy for the Responsible use of AI in Government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI inai/ai-in-governmentv1.1.pdf-policy), DVAwillensure: -s that AI use: - is appropriately governed- engagement with AI is confident, with arrangements that evolve as technology and policy mature - is intentional, safeand, responsible, and promotes accountability and transparency - maintains stakeholderstrust, particularly within the veteran community, have trust in our use of AI - risks are identified and addressed with appropriate mitigation measures - AI access and usage is monitored.DVA has estood upablished an AI Advisory Board,which includes Australian Gcomprising government representatives, technical experts and a representative from veterans’welfare and advocacy community organisations. The Advisory Board will help us ensure there is proper consultation with the veteran community in consideration and adoption of AI. Additionally, the Advisory Board will provide advice on AI safety and security, and will be consulted on AI initiatives, as well as on the preparation and maintenance of this transparency statement. DVA is exploring opportunities where AI can help to achieve positive outcomes for veterans and veteran families. Ongoing engagement and corganisations, to support consultation, safety and oversight of AI initiatives and this transparency statement. Back to top ## Consultation with thevVeterancCommunityis essential to ensure improved outcomes and improved services. DVA is committed to building trust with the veteran community, and we are dedicated to transparently designing and driving improvement initiatives through consultation wiDVA is committed to transparent engagement with the veterans, their families and their advocates. When new proposals on AI are considered, DVA will engage with the veteran community via established communication and consultationcommunity about how AI is considered and used. Consultation occurs through existing mechanisms,such as, but not limited to: - DVA website - Social media - _Vetaffairs_ - DefencePpublications &Ttransition seminars - Advocacy Training and Development Program (ATDP) … g - Ex-Service Organisation Round Table (ESORT) - Female VeteransFamilies Forum (FVFF)and Veterans’ Families Policy Forum - National Aged and Community Care Forum (NACCF) - Operational Working Party (OWP) - Younger Veterans - Contemporary Needs Forum (YVF). This engagement ensures that AI initiatives reflect community expectations and contribute to improved outcomes and services for veterans and their families. Back to top ## Adoption of AI in DVA DVA adopts the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI](https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html)in our consideration and discussion of AI. > An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or impl … AI systems vary in their autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.AI at DVA is used primarily in analytics for insights across **service delivery** and **corporate and enabling** domains, although this is evolving. DVA will monitor usage to assure ongoing suitability of these technologies for these purposes. For more information about the usage of AI in government and the domains in which they apply, please see [http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). The departmentDVA currently has AI technology deployed for: - Statistical modelling and horizon scanning– this includes AI technology (Musing machineL‑learning algorithms)to supportmaintenance and enhancement of data modelling. - Improving writing clarity – AI tool(s) support checking of spelling, grammar and punctuation. - AI-enabled website search on the DVA website, to improve access to publicly available information. The search function only has access to publicly available information. DVA is also testing and trialling AI tools. - A trial of Microsoft Copilot is underway, consistdata analysis - Writing clarity tools to support spelling, grammar and punctuation checking - Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for research, idea generation and writing assistance, with DVA‑specific safeguards ensuring no data is shared with public large language models - AI‑enabled website search, which only has access to publicly available information - Semantic Text Analysis to interpret unstructured MyService responses provided by DVA clients with trials by other Australian Government Departments. - DVA is accessing the Commonwealth whole of government GovAI environment, including to evaluate potential AI tools, which may support DVA employees to speed up claims processing. Current testing on the GovAI technology platform does nohen submitting claims, with staff always retaining responsibility for analysis and decisions relating to claim outcomes. DVA is also trialling AI tools: - Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed version) consistent with other Commonwealth agencies - GovAI platform capabilities to support claim processing, without useing veteran personal data. - DVA is trialling an AI tool CLIKChat to help staff quickly find and, and always with human oversight - CLIKChat, an internal chatbot that summarises information fromour external websitthree publicly available government sources(- Consolidated Library of Information and Knowledge, Department of Veterans’ Affairs and Repatriation Medical Authority).CLIKChat uses publicly available information, iIt does not access veteran records or personal data. Itand does not make decisions orgiverecommendations.All information from CLIKChat is checked by staff with human judgement always in control. DVA also expects the underpinning technology in our digital ecosystem to become increasingly sophisticated, including by leveDVA is developing a trial of a voluntary, consent based, Proof of Concept Claims Document Reader AI tool. The prototype document reader has been built by DVA within the GovAI Platform. A proposed trial will use a clear consent model to ensure trial participants who volunteer to participate in the trial understand the purpose of the tool, what information may be used during the trial and how AI enabled technologies may interact with information. The trial will test the suitability of the tool to assist staff. The tool does not make decisions or determine claim outcomes. Claims decisions will continue to be made by traging AI. Periodic updates will be made to this statement to report on progressed DVA delegates. For more information about the usage of AI in government and the domains in which they apply, please see [Artificial intelligence in government](http://digital.gov.au/ai/resources/use-classification). Back to top ## Simpler forms of basic computer validation and task automationAs the community would expect,DVA computer systems also support employees and decision-makers with basic validation and task m … s are governed by other arrangements and are outside the scope of the\[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI inai/ai-in-governmentv1.1.pdf-policy). DVA **does** make use of basic computer-assisted task management t … Back to top ## Compliance As part of our adoption of AI technology,we areDVA ensuringes compliance withallrelevant legislation, including the _Archives Act_ 1983_(Cth), _Freedom of Information Act_ 1982_(Cth), and the _Privacy Act_ 1988_(Cth),[DVA’s Privacy Policy](https://www.dva.gov.au/about-us/privacy-and-legal-resources/privacy/dva-privacy-policy "DVA Privacy Policy"), and compliance with relevant Veterans’ Affairs law. For more inform … ws relevant to support for veterans and their families, please visit [ourthe DVA website](https://www.dva.gov.au/access-benefitsfinancial-support/compensation-claims/laws-cover-claims"Laws that cover claims"). For additional detail about all legislation administered by the dep … [Federal Register of Legislation](https://www.legislation.gov.au/).The department is compliant with theBack to top ## Review and Contact DVA meets mandatory requirements of the\[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy for the responsible use of AI in government v1.1.pdf): - A DVA AI Accountable Official was designated in October 2024. - This AI Transparency Statement was first published on dva.gov.au in February 2025. We will be reviewing and updating this statement annually or when significant changes occur within our adoption of AI technologyand has designated an AI Accountable Official (October 2024). The designation of a Chief AI Officer is currently being formalised. For enquiries about the DVA AI Transparency Statement or about our …The DTA discloses new AI use cases, including AI-assisted evaluation of Digital Marketplace Panel 2 applications from February 2026, and adds a Service Delivery domain.
read by Claude Opus 5- New use case: structured AI-assisted evaluation model for Digital Marketplace Panel 2 applications from February 2026
- Adds 'Service Delivery' to its AI domains alongside Corporate and Enabling and Workplace Productivity
- New section classifying use cases against the Standard: decision-support on submitted applications, and Copilot for workplace productivity
- AI fundamentals training now described as implemented rather than planned; AI adoption no longer described as a 'trial'
The words that changed
The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai/ai-in-government-policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officialsility), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai/-transparency-statements). This page provides details of the DTA’s impl … ouraging the implementation of further actions suggested in the policy. The COO has primary responsibility for the following areas of the AI … monitoring and measuring the implementation of each policy requirement. - strongly encouraging additional training for staff in consideration … or the procurement, development, training and deployment of AI systems. The following areas have been identified as joint responsibilities o … c AI policy - reviewing our policy implementation regularly and provideing feedback to the DTA’s AI policy team - enhancing the response and adaptation to AI policy changes in the DTA. ## **DTA’s approach to AI adoption and use** The DTA istrialling theadoption ofng AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation. For more information, see the section on_[adopting emerging technologies_](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-future) in the [_Data and Digital Government Strategy_](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies). The DTA is committed to demonstrating, encouraging and supporting … ice, and in digital and ICT investments, systems and digital services.willhave implemented [_AI fundamentals training_](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/staff-training) for all staff, regardless of their role. ### **How th … gnificantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention.and usage pattern ofService Delivery and Workplace Productivity. From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, the DTA … oft 365 Copilot. DTA now continues to make Copilot available to staff.isparticipatinged in the [_Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework).arewill be introducing a structured AI assisted evaluation model to assist with the Digital Marketplace Panel 2 (DMP2) evaluation process in February 2026. In addition, we are also exploring the potential for AI to be used by our staff and by our ICT systems in accordance with Home Affairs advice. ## **AI safety and governance** Within the DTA, each ICT system has an identified_system owner_who is\_\_accountable for the system, and each AI use case has an identified_executive sponsor_.. All AI use cases are recorded in an internal register to track their p … assurance framework, and to identify an appropriate executive sponsor.sfrom AI. ICT system owners and AI use case executive sponsors are accountable to the Executive Board.beta-dta-5.preprod.govcms.gov.au/annual-reports)www.dta.gov.au/annual-reports). ## Classification of AI system use cases The DTA currently uses AI in the following system use cases as defined by the Standard for Transparency Statements, details of which are located on the internal DTA AI use case register. **Assisting decision making and administrative action through assessing and making recommendations on submitted applications to a human decision maker:** - By leveraging AI to support the assessment process, the DTA can enhance the consistency and efficiency of administrative decisions. This approach helps ensure that all applications are evaluated against the same set of criteria, reducing potential human bias and increasing transparency. **Workplace productivity through the use of Microsoft 365 Copilot:** - By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot, the DTA is enhancing staff productivity and collaboration across teams. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, generate emails and reports, and assist with data analysis. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. This transparency statement was last updated on41 December 20245. It will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every … ublication Date** | **Update Comment**\ ---|---\ 1 November 2024 | -iInitial version. -dDesignation of Accountable Officials. 4 December 2024 | -fFull transparency statement. -bBrings the DTA up to date with the requirements of version 1.1 of the policy. 01 December 2025 | - Update stating Copilot and AI DMP2 are now in use. For further information or enquiries about the DTA’s adoption of artificial intelligence,you cancontact us directly at [_info@dta.gov.au_](mailto:info@dta.gov.au?subject=AI%20transparency%20statement%20enquiry).Full rewrite naming a Chief AI Officer, an AI Governance Committee, four AI tools, staff use cases and a compliance table against the DTA policy.
read by Claude Opus 5- Appoints a Chief AI Officer and an AI Governance Committee chaired by the COO, alongside the existing CIO accountable official
- Names four systems: GovAI Multi-Model, Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS, Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (DSS internal) and Otter AI
- New commitment: no AI use cases involving direct public interaction or activities significantly affecting individuals; all outputs human-checked
- Adds a table of compliance status against each DTA mandatory requirement, with due dates of 1 June and 1 December 2026
The words that changed
# ArtificialiIntelligence (AI)tTransparencysStatement We adopt a whole of Australian Governmere committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). AI offers significantaopproach to use AI safely and responsibly while embracing the opportunities AI provides. We followortunities to improve productivity and service delivery for the Australian community. The Department of Social Services (DSS) governs our use of AI in line with all relevant laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency'’s [Ppolicy for the responsible use of AI in government(Opensexternal websitein a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/ai/ai-in-government-policy) (DTAPpolicy). Transparency is key to earning public trust and i, and best practice. ## Purpose of AI adoption We use AI to improve how we work and deliver services. It helps us streamline processes and important aim of the DTA Policy and broader APS Reformsncrease efficiency. It provides staff with better tools to serve the community. We are cognise the benefits arising from safe and responsible use of AI systems. We are developing suitable governance and oversight to support future AI use and ensure alignmentmmitted to using AI in ways that serve the public interest. This means improving services, being transparent, and upholding ethical standards. We keep safety and trust at the centre of our AI adoption. ## Our current AI use cases Currently, our approved AI use cases are within theDTA Policy and other relevant policies and legisl: - Service _delivery, Policy and legal_ and _Corporate and enabling_ domains; and - _Workplace productivity_ and _Analytics for insights_ usage patterns, of the [classification system for AI use (Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Wearecurrentlyexploring AI capabilities through twodo not use AI within the _Decision makininitiatives: our participation in the GovAI program and the use of Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS. ## GovAI Program This initiative gives us a chance to get hands-on experience with various AI toolsg and administrative action_ or _Image processing_ usage patterns, or the _Scientific_ , _Compliance and fraud detection_ , and _Law enforcement, intelligence and security_ domains. ## How our staff use AI Staff mainly use AI systems for: - summarising documents, reports and meeting notes into key points - preparing newsletters, presentations and web content; rewrite drafts for clarity - creating agendas and recording action items - generating graphs and dashboards from data; summarising insights - extracting information and preparing summaries - drafting asecure, controlled setting. Our focus is on exploring how AI might boost productivity in our corporate and enabling functions, as well as enhance our policy development and data analytic capabilitind reviewing policy documents for clarity and compliance - summarising contract documents and identifying compliance risks - developing training guides and making technical content easy to understand - summarising risk registers and preparing risk reports with dashboards - generating transcripts of public hearings and session, for example Senate Estimates. #### [ More information (Opens external website)](https://www.govai.gov.au/) Visit GovAI ## Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS In addition to GovAI, we have authorised limitedAI systems we use **1. GovAI Multi-Model** – we use the GovAI platform as a secure space for staff to test AI models and to support staff learning. This helps build capability uplift and supports safe trials. **2. Microsoft Copilot via GovTEAMS** – we use Microsoft Copilot in the secure GovTEAMS environment. **3. Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (DSS Internal)** – we useofMicrosoft 365 Copilotthrough the GovTEAMS platform. This tool provides AI-assisted capabilitiesChat within the DSS controlled environment. **4. Otter AI** – We use Otter AI for a select group of staff, an AI-powered transcription tool designed to convert speech into text. - DSS AI usage does not include use cases that involve direct interaction withinthewhole of government secure collaborative environment, furtherpublic - activities that would significantly affect individuals. All AI outputs are checked by a human before they are applied or acted on. This ensures technology supportings ourday-to-day operations and decision-making processes. These initiatives are being undertaken with appropriate governanceoperations but does not replace human judgment in areas that affect people’s lives. ## Our AI governance approach ### Current state We take a risk-based approach using AI. Before we approve a new AI use case, we assess legal, privacy and ovpersight arrangements in place. Staff training on AI is a central consideration of these governance and oversight protocols. Training will be rolled out throughout the year to suppational risks to ensure compliance with all relevant laws and DSS policies. Our governance arrangements include: - an **accountable official** – our Chief Information Officer (CIO) - a **Chief AI Officer** (CAIO) to provide strategic leadership and oversight - an**AI Governance Committee** chaired by the Chief Operating Officer (COO), and including seniortstaffparticipating in the AI initifrom the department’s legal, data, corporate, communicativeons andto build AI capability across our workforce. This includes leveraging resources and learning opportunities provided through the GovAI program. We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official. This is consistent with the DTA Policy. The CIO is responsible for implementation of the DTA Policy and for leading on matters of AI within our department. We keep up to date with changes in the AI policy and governance environment and engage with whole-of-government capacity building initiatives, such as GovAI, to encourage APS-wide capability uplift over time. While our use of AI isICT areas. The committee’s role includes: - guiding our AI strategy, principles and policies - identifying, assessing and managing AI risks and opportunities - reviewing and approving AI use cases - monitoring performance and impacts. Our existing AI policy sets clear expectations for staff. It limits how they can use AI in their work. We use technological controls that restrict access to publicly available AI tools from our ICT environment. This helps ensure AI use is secure, compliant and responsible. Existing DSS policies also apply to AI use. These include policies on: - privacy - confidentiality - risk management - procurement - archiving - acceptable use of technology - cyber security. This approach ensures that our AI use complies with legal and ethical obligations, protects sensitive information, manages risks effectively, and meets requirements for record-keeping and accountability. We monitor the effectiveness of AI systems through robust governance arrangements, policies, processes and by tracking AI usage. We also engage with staff to understand how AI affects workflows and productivity. ### Future state We are strengthening our governance and oversight to support future AI use and make sure we comply with the DTA policy, other departmental policies, and laws. We are building an AI governance structure into a mature, scalable framework. This framework will align with Australia’s AI Ethics Principles and whole-of-government standards. It will set out clear principles, roles and processes for responsible AI development, procurremently limited to, deployment and oversight. To ensure accountrolled trials and exploration, we are committed to ensuring compliance with applicable legislation and regulations, and that any future useability, every AI use case will have approved key performance indicators (KPIs) to track outcomes, measure effectiveness and confirm that AI solutions deliver value and meet DSS goals. ## Our compliance with the DTA policy The following table sets out an overview of our compliance with the mandatory requirements of the DTA policy: **Mandatory requirement**| **Status**| **Comments**| **Due date**\ ---|---|---|---\ **AI transparency statement**| Compliant| N/A| N/A\ **Strategic position ofn AIis undertaken safely and responsibly. We will ensure: - AI use is appropriately governed - our engagement with AI is confident, safe and responsible - risks are identified and managed -adoption**| In development| We are documenting our AI strategic position to guide responsible adoption and use.| 1 June 2026\ **Accountable officials**| Compliant| We have appointed our Chief Information Officer (CIO) as our Accountable Official.| N/A\ **Accountable use case owners**| In development| We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure will guide how we assess, adopt and monitor AI across the department to ensure responsible and effective use.| 1 December 2026\ **Internal AI use case register**| In development| We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure will guide how we assess, adopt and monitor AI accerossand usage is monitored - measures are implemented to monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems - efforts are made to protect the public against negative impacts. Our AI Transparency Stthe department to ensure responsible and effective use.| 1 December 2026\ **Operationalise the responsible use of AI**| In development| We approved an AI governance structure and are developing and implementing this framework. The structure will guide how we assess, adopt and monitor AI across the department to ensure responsible and effective use.| 1 December 2026\ **Staff training on AI**| Compliant| We require staff to complete mandatory AI training, including the _AI in Government Fundamentals_ course. We also encourage further learning through programs offered by the Australian Public Service Commission and the Digital Transformation Agency.| 1 December 2026\ **Assessment of AI use cases and subsequent treatementwill b**| In development| We areviewed and updated annually or when we make a significant change to our approach to AI. This AI Transparency Statement was updated on 28 August 2025developing and implementing a formal AI governance framework. This framework will require all AI use cases to be assessed in accordance with the DTA policy.| 1 December 2026 This statement is authorised by DSS’s accountable official, the Chief Information Officer. This AI Transparency Statement was updated on 22 January 2026. ## More information - Visit the Digital Transformation Agency to read the [DTA policy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). - If you have questions or feedback, email [AI@dss.gov.au](mailto:AI@dss.gov.au). - Print - Share Share this page: https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/co … Copy shareable link Close - \[ Email \](mailto:?subject=ArtificialiIntelligence (AI)tTransparencysStatement&body=https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-polic … back). DSS3370 | Permalink: www.dss.gov.au/node/3370 Last modified 28 August0 January 20256.Health rewrites its statement for policy v2.0: names Microsoft 365 Copilot, an AI subcommittee and assurance framework, and drops its no-public-facing-AI and human-checks-all-outputs pledges.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: commitment that the department isn't using AI where the public can directly interact with or be impacted by it
- Removed: "a human will assess all AI outputs to ensure accuracy" and "we will not use AI for decision making purposes", replaced by "we do not use AI to automate decisions" and AI-supported advice to decision makers
- Discloses Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat rollout, mandatory AI fundamentals training and user acknowledgement
- New governance: AI Subcommittee advising the Digital Committee, an AI assurance framework and an internal use case register restricting approved uses
The words that changed
The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’sOur commitment to the safeand, ethical, responsible and legal use of AI supports our vision to deliver better health and wellbeing for all Australians, now and for future generations. We are aligning with the whole of government approach to AI. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible … rtificial Intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability) 2.0 sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. A, along with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan), [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ … 4-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Interim gGuidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai).## Why we use AI To achieve our vision in delivering better health and wellbeing for all Australians, the department commits to the safe and responsible adoption of AI to take advantage of the various benefits the technology provides. ## How we use AI The departmentWe identify, assess and manage AI use case impacts and risks informed by [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction "https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction"). ## Why we use AI Our adoption of AI will improve: - service delivery - policy outcomes - efficiency - productivity. Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. ## How we use AI From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We have made Copilot Chat available to all staff and are rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot licenced version to staff in phases. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, our staff must complete [AI fundamentals training](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-training) that includes responsible and acceptable use of AI. We also require users to acknowledge safe, responsible and ethical use of AI before accessing and using generative AI tools. We restrict the use of AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, to certain approved use cases in our use case register. We uses[generative](https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/generative-ai.html) and narrow model AI Iand narrow AI models](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption/mitigating-risks-and-harms) in line with the DTA’s [Classification systems for use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)as below: **Usage patterns:** for. ### What we use AI for We can use AI to: - analysinge data to gain insightsand- automatinge activities to make tasks more efficient and increase workplace productivity. This allows staff to focus on more complex and mean- identify patterns and objects automatically - support decision making by helping staff summarise, analyse or synthesise information used to prepare advice or recommendations considered by our committees or decision makers. We do not use AI to automate decisions. Human officials remaingfulwork. **Domains:** includely accountable for the advice and recommendations they provide. ### Where we use AI We can use AI in these areas: - policy and legal - scientific,- compliance and fraud detection,- corporate and enablingand- service delivery. ## Our approach with AIA human will assess all AI outputs to ensWe set up an Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee (AISc) to guide oureaccuracy. We will not use AI for decision making purposes. The department isn’t using AI applications where the public can directly interact with or be impactpproach to AI. The AISc advises the Digital Committee which oversees our digital, data and ICT functions and capabilities and includes senior executive members from across the department. The AISc considers: - the application of AI within the Health portfolio’s policy and program context - the use and regulation of AI in the health, disability and aged care sectors - the use of AI within the department - the whole of government approach to AI and the intersection with health, disability and aged care sectors. Our staff will be able to explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI.will update this transparency statement ifhave an AI assurance framework in place. We also keep an internal register of AI use cases, in line with the whole-of-government approach. This register helps us see where AI is being used and monitor its usage properly. We have measures in place to: - make sure AI is well governed and managed. Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information withourt approach changes. ## Our commitment Tval through our assurance and governance processes - make AI use across the department viscommitted to using AI in a responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives will alignible, so we can govern it effectively and manage risks, assurance and reporting - encourage staff to use AI safely, responsibly, ethically and lawfully through corporate communications and training - support collaboration across the department and with otheAPS values and have the publics’ best interest at heartr government agencies on AI use, including developing shared resources to ensure safe, responsible, ethical and lawful use. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI in a safe, ethical, responsible and lawful way for the benefit of Australians. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable: - legislation - regulationaws - frameworks - policies - best practice.## Safe and responsible AI adoptionWe remain committed to transparency and protecting the public. We will be transparent as weadoptresponsiblytheadopt evolving AI technology and policy requirements.The department is developing internal Health and Aged Care## Safe and responsible AI adoption We are developing internal AI policy and guidance material.Ppolicy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI.We will make sureThis includes ourprolicies meet the proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings that are underway by the Department of Industry, Science and Resourcese in grants, procurement, regulation and policy making related to AI. We will leverage wholeAustralian G-government policies and develop internal policies and guidance material … reedom of Information (FOI) considerations - record keeping - security,- procurement of AI systems - risk mitigation and technical guardrails … tors) and consultants. We will update this transparency statement asthe departmentwe continuesto develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology.## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official for the department. For questions about this statement or the department’s use of AI, you can contactWe will continuously review our use of AI to: - protect the public against negative impacts - reflect the pace of technological change - manage the evolving risk environment - align with whole-of-government guidance. ## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official.  ### [ AIAccountable Officialteam ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-accountable-officialteam?language=en) Contactour AI Accountable Official for questions about the department’s use of AIus for questions about our AI transparency statement, our use of AI, or to report AI safety concerns, including AI-related incidents. [AI@health.gov.au](mailto:AI@health.gov.au) Date last updated:20 Ma16 February 20256 Tags: - [About the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/abo …Rewrites the statement for 2026, adding risk assessment processes and DTA standard alignment while dropping the AI Assurance Framework pilot and high-risk reporting commitment.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: alignment with the Commonwealth AI Assurance Framework pilot and the commitment to report high-risk use cases to the DTA
- Adds an AI risk assessment process alongside the use case register
- Names alignment with the DTA technical standard, AI Impact Assessment Tool and AI procurement guidance
- Says the AI ethics and governance framework has now been developed and published (previously a future commitment)
The words that changed
Skip to page navigation # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Last updated:2819 February 20256In accordancThis page explains how we are using Artificial Intelligence, in line with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), this page provides the department’s statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency. The department sees potential to use AI to. We recognise that AI can help in supporting delivery of the outcomes in our [Corporate Plan](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/reporting/corporate-plan "Corporate plan")and realise benefits for the organisation and public. The department’s. Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Governmen … rategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies)in relation to adopting emerging technologies, the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). When we referringto AIthe department applies, we use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)](h … ems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment." (OECD).The departmentWe commitsto using AI in a safe and responsible manner. We always use AI with human oversight or intervention. ## How we use AIThe department isWe currently usinge AI to supportourthe delivery of innovative and expert advice to the Australian Government grounded in evidence and science.ThWe classification of the departmentsy our usage of AI anddomains is based onrelated domains using the Australian Governmentsclassification system (see the Classification system for AI use on the DTA [Artificial intelligence i … /use-classification) page), tailored to the department’s activities.The department’sOur current use of AIisfocused in thes on policy, scientific, and administrative and regulatory domains,alwayswithahumanas adecision maker. The department is making somelways making the final decisions. We also useofAI in corporate and enabling services–, initscluding media monitoring activities andtosupport for clear communication. Across these domains,the departmentwe usesAI to support policy development, analysis, monitoring, decision making, and communication by: -Iinforming decision making and administrative actions by providing input toahuman decision makers. For example, analysing document sets submitted to the department to ensure all relevant information is included. -Ffinding and creating insights fromvarious types ofdata through detailed analysis, predictive modelling, and reporting. For example, creating insights from unstructured PDF documents. -Iimproving workplace productivity, includingthrough task automationof tasks,, workflow managementof workflows and enablingand communication support. For example, checking that documents meetrequiredaccessibilitystandardrequirements and providing feedbackon how to make writingto improve clearity and conciseness. -Pprocessing sensor data (videographysuch as video, imagery, sound, and radaretc.) to identify patterns and objects. For example, identifying the presence of animalsfromusing thermal imaging.The department supports the use ofWe support staff using generative AI tools, bystaff, guidance is providedproviding guidance on how to do so responsibly and ethically, and in accordance with rel … ividual responsibilities when accessing publicly available tools. Wewillcontinuetoexplore furthering applications of AI to support our vision, purposes and outcomes as se … s://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/reporting/corporate-plan "Corporate plan") and the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). This may includeapplicationuses across policy development, program delivery, asset management, the a … tatement as our use of AI changes. ## Public interaction and impactOur department isWe are committed to ensuringthat theour use of AIby the department is for thebenefitofs the public.The departmentWe recognisesthatanassessment ofing whether a particular use of AI is beneficialwillofteninvolve the exercise of judgement. Therefore, arequires judgement. Any decisions or outcomes generated or informed by AI that could affect the public will involvclude human oversight or intervention to ensure fairness and accountability. ## Monitoring AI effectiveness and impactsThe department hasWe have established and maintainsan AI use case register and risk assessment process. The register collects informationabouton AI solutions that are in development or in use across theDdepartment.An executive sponsor is identified for each use case, along with itsEach use case has an identified executive sponsor and business owner.IWhen completing the register, business ownersmustensurethat AI isAI solutions are implemented safely and responsiblywhich. This includesidentifying how they monitorcompleting risk assessment and monitoring risk mitigating activities, ongoing effectiveness,identifypotential negative impacts andstepsimplemented to mitigate potential harms from AI usesteps to alleviate possible harms. The AI rehigh level alignment between the register and the [Commonwealth AI Assurance framework pilotter and AI risk assessment align with the DTA’s: - [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.digital.gov.au/blogs/dta-pilots-new-ai-assurance-framework), with the risk of each solution assessed under the assurance framework risk matrix. Should any high-risk use cases be surfaced through the register reporting to the DTA will occur inpolicy/ai/AI-technical-standard) - [AI Impact Assessment Tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) - [Guidance on AI procurement in government](https://www.buyict.gov.au/sp?id=buyer&kb=KB0011755). To support AI risk mitigation, we will finalise our AI Risk Appetite Guidelines with the Policy requirements. The department willhich sit alongside tools supporting staff to assess and manage risk effectively. We have also developed and published an AI ethics and governance framework that aligns with wholeThe department will utilise AI in accordancWe use AI in line with: - applicable legislation,and regulations,- whole-of-government frameworks and policies. We will comply with all mandatory requirements of- the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Wewill regularlyreviewourcomplianceas a part ofthrough existing governance,and risk management processes.the departmentwe implements itsour [Enterprise Data Strategy](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/information-public-data/strategy "Enterprise Data Strategy"), wewill ensure ongoing compliance by embedding a culture that balancescontinue to build a culture that balances innovation with responsible AI risk management andinnovationuse. ## Accountable officialThe department’sOur Chief Data Officer was designated as the accountable official for the … on 11 November 2024. ## Contact For questions about this statement,please emailcontact: [CDO@dcceew.gov.au](mailto:CDO@dcceew.gov.au) ## AItTransparencysStatementThis statement was last updated in February 2025. In line with the [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) it will bereview and updates We last updated this statement February 2026. We will review and updatedit if our approach toandor use of AI changes, and at least everytwelve mo12 months, in line with policy requiremenths.Updates DAFF's statement to policy v2.0, moves the accountable official to the CISO, names a Chief AI Officer, and adds compliance and fraud detection.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable Official moved from Chief Data Officer to Chief Information and Security Officer
- Chief Digital and Data Officer designated Chief AI Officer under the APS AI Plan 2025
- New use domain: compliance and fraud detection
- Removed: account of participating in the Pilot AI Assurance Framework and using it to assess use cases
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence transparency statement The [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)ai/ai-in-government-policy) version 2.0 (the policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to: - [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-stateility); - [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai-transparency-statements); - [developing a strategic position on AI adoption](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [operationalising the responsible use of AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); - [AI use case accountability](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [internal use case registers](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [staff training on AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); and - [AI use case impact assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai-use-case-impact-assessments).srules-based automation, as these systems do not infer or predict how … ficial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles)and the, [APS Experience Design Principles](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/aps-experience-design-principles), and the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). DAFF is exploring the adoption of emerging technologies, including … ommitment to improve regulatory service delivery and decision-making.DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI.For more information, see the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/). DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI in alignment with the Government’s broader commitment to uplift data capability across the Australian Public Service (APS). DAFF is committed to building strong governance foundations to support … report on the use of AI to the department’s Digital Business Division who manage the internal use case register. The department actively encourages staff to undertake the AI in Gove … fundamentals training through regular communications and promotionalmaterialevents. Additionally, DAFF has an _Artificial Intelligence User Acceptance … confirm and acknowledge that they are familiar with before accessing external generative AI tools online. This requires staff to agree that they wil … personal, sensitive or classified information that may be subject togovernment orthird-party restrictions.Staff are reminded that they may only input publicly available information andThrough the _User Acceptance_ page, staff are reminded that they must act in accordance with the Government’s Protective Security Policy Frameworkand, Information Security Manual and internal departmental policies. Staff are also encouraged to read the department’s ICT Acceptable Us … clude: - Corporate and enabling - Scientific - Service delivery - Compliance and fraud detection - **Usage patterns** include: - Analytics for insights - Workplace productivity The department is using AI to: -AImprove workplace productivity by automateing routine tasks,managesupporting workflows,createbrainstorming and creation of draft content, and facilitateing communications - Summarise high volumes of documents or information - Identify, produce orand understandinsightpatterns from data- Understand patternset(s) to produce insights andtrends in large data setsporting - Categorise documents for storage and retention. DAFF does not curr … ts with the public without a human intermediary or intervention. ## Accountable Official DAFF has anrtificial Intelligence Accountable Official and Chief AI Officer DAFF has an Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official (AIAO) under thePpolicy. The ChiefData Officer (CDO) was designated as the Accountable Official on 16 October 2024Information and Security Officer has been designated as the Accountable Official. Previously, this role had been designated to the Chief Digital and Data Officer, who is now the Chief AI Officer. The AIAO is responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations and implementation of the policy. Under the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025), agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer (CAIO). The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the CAIO and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, propelling innovation, integrating AI into business processes and championing adoption of AI. ## AI safety and governance DAFF has an internal register of AI us … ing of AI use cases throughout the AI lifecycle. DAFF has measures toensure: - Ensure the design and application of AI is effectively governed and managed. - Ensure risk management frameworks include AI\*\*-\*\*-specific considerations, ensuring mitigation and controls are implemented when risks are identified. - Ensure AI use casesaundergo an assurance process and re tracked and monitored through the internal register across the AI l … le legislation, regulations, frameworks, and policies. ## ContinuousIimprovement DAFFis commitacknowledges the value of strong governance, oversight, and accountability, and is dedicated to regularly reviewing and updatingAI policiesits AI guidance and practices. This includesstaying informed about new developkeeping up-to-date with advancements in AI technology, ethics,andregulatory requirements. For example, in September 2024, DAFF participated in the [Pilot Australian Government AI Assurance Frameworkand Whole of Government initiatives, such as [GovAI](https://www.digitalgovai.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) (AI Assurance Framework) and applied a number of aspects in the AI Assurance Framework to certain AI use case trials to test its application and impact. Following on from the pilot’s conclus). As these services roll out, the department will seek to utilise the functions GovAI offers to the Australian Public Service. These may include services that feature learning resources, an AI app catalogue, peer-to-peer collaboration tools, and a secure sandbox environment for testing and experimentation,. DAFFuses the AI Assurance Framework to assess current AI use cases at the various stages of the AI lifecyclewill adopt GovAI offerings where consistent with departmental and government priorities. As the landscape evolves, DAFF will continue to systematically revi … g statement’s accuracy. - This Transparency Statement was modified on25 Jul16 February 20256. ## ContactuUs For any enquiries relating to DAFF’s use of AI or the information p …Complete rewrite: the Regulator now discloses active AI use, names a Chief AI Officer appointed July 2025, and adds risk, training and prohibition commitments.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: earlier claim that it does not currently use AI in any services or advice
- Discloses live AI use: Microsoft 365 Copilot for staff productivity, image analysis for compliance reviews, anomaly detection for fraud and SRES compliance
- Chief AI Officer appointed July 2025; accountable officials expanded to include CAIO alongside Chief Data, Risk and Information Officers
- Technology Strategy and Change Committee named as primary AI oversight body, replacing the former AI steering committee
The words that changed
Weare committed to using technology, including artificial intelligence (AI), to enhance our capability to be an efficient and effective economic regulator accelerating carbon abatement for Australia. We don’t cuse artificial intelligence (AI) in carefully managed and transparent ways to support our role as Australia’s independent economic regulator accelerating carbon abatement. We use AI to improve the quality, efficiency and integrity of our rently use AI in any of the services or advice we provide. As we adopt AI capabilities, we will update this statement to outline: - its use - why we use it - how we'll monigulatory functions. AI helps us analyse data, detect anomalies, and streamline internal processes. All decisions that affect people, organisations or scheme eligibility are made by Clean Energy Regulator staff, not AI. We review this statement at least once a year, updating it as our AI use matures. ## How we use AI We'll consider AI use to provide analytics for and insights intortheeffectiveness of its use. We will review this AI transparency statement and update it annually, or when any new factors impact this statement. ## Background The Digital Transformation Agency's [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/responsible-use-of-AI-in-government) sets out the Australian Government's approach to embracing AI's opportunities. It also provides for the safe and responsible use of AI. Transparency is critical to building public trust and is an important aim of the policy and broader APS Reform agenda. #### Definition of AI We use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles) definition of AI: An AI system is a mschemes we regulate on behalf of the Australian Government. We're using, developing and considering AI in the following usage patterns and domains. We're using, developing and considering AI in line with common Australian Government AI usage patterns and domains. See the [classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) for more information. ### Usage patterns #### Workplace productivity We allow our staff to use AI in their work with the objective of enhancing productivity and service delivery. This includes enterprise AI deployed in our internal ICT environment like Microsoft 365 Copilot. Our staff use AI to: - assist in the creation of government documents - assist with research and analysis - summarise data across multiple sources - interrogate, analyse and obtain insights from datasets - answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies, procedures and processes - assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documents, emails or other content - create and debug code used in data analysis, management and processing - assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts - search information repositories and retrieve documents, information or data. #### Image processing We're developing AI assisted image analysis to support compliance reviews, subject to human review and confirmation. ### Domains #### Service delivery We're investigating the use of AI to support our staff to: - assist with routine administrative tasks and information analysis - improve collaboration and documentation practices - support efficient drafting of standard content, subject to human review. #### Compliance and fraud detection We're developing: - AI tools to spot unusual patterns that may indicate non-compliance or fraud - AI under the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme (SRES) to support compliance monitoring, including identifying potentially non-compliant claims or data discrepancies for human review. #### Corporate and enabling We're investigating the use of AI to support corporate functions, including HR, finance, media and communications, and IT to improve operational efficiency. ## Transparency We're committed to open communication about our AI use. AI contributes to information or insights but does not make regulatory decisions. Any AI derived advice that affects people or regulated entities is reviewed and approved by trained Clean Energy Regulator staff. We won't deploy public facing AI without user disclosure, a clear human in the loop escalation path, defined accuracy safeguards and accessibility consideration. ## How we assess and manage risks We assess and monitor all AI systems to ensure they are safe, transparent and appropriate for our regulatory responsibilities. Our risk and assurance approach ine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environcludes: - completing a risk-based AI suitability assessment before any development or deployment - testing and evaluating AI systems against agreed risk controls and thresholds before they are used - monitoring the effectiveness of deployed AI systems on an ongoing basis and subsequent reassessments are conducted periodically or when triggered by significant changes such as model updates, new data sources, or incidents - applying stronger safeguards for higher risk use cases - pausing or discontinuing use if risk thresholds, accuracy metrics or safeguards are not met. We'll maintain an AI Use Case Register that describes each use case and corresponding risk-based AI suitability assessments.Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## PThe register will be updated when new use cases are approved for deployment or when material changes occur. This process aligns with the [Australian Government Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) and incorporates additional oversight for higher risk or higher impact AI use. ## Ethical principles- We aWe're committed to the ethical use of AI. OurAIsystemswill bare developed and deployed with fairness, accountability, privacy, prote … ity, reliability, safety, contestability and transparency in mind. Wewill regularlyreview ourAIpractices regularly to ensure theyalign withmeet ethical standards and do notperpetuatintroduce biasesor discrimination.- We will use our AI systems to help, not replace, human decision-making. Human-in-the-loop will ensure all critical decisions are reviewed and approved by qualified public officials to ensure accuracy and accountability. - WTo protect the public and scheme integrity, we won't: - automate compliance, enforcement or eligibility decisions without human review and approval - train or prompt AI systems with sensitive or personal information unless expressly assessed and approved (for example, through a privacy impact assessment and security review) - generate or issuearetransparent about our AI use and its impact. We provide regular updates on our AI initiatives and their outcomes on our website. - We will consider all AI use cases against our compliance with legislation, regulations and requirements under all relevant statutory bodies andgulatory notices or legal instruments without human validation and sign off - use generative AI to produce forecasting or analytical outputs without human validation, provenance controls and audit capture. ## Staff capability and training We build staff AI capability through a community of practice, supporting knowledge sharing and safe adoption, and through targeted training such as prompt engineering skills aligned to our regulatory purpose. These activities ensure staff can use AI confidently, responsibly, effectively and in ways that strengthen our regulatory functions. All Clean Energy Regulator staff are required to complete mandatory training on the responsible use of AI in line with the[ p[Policy forrthe ResponsibleuUse of AI ingGovernment](https://architecturewww.digital.gov.au/responsible-use-of-AI-in-government). ## Governance Our accountable officials enable and prepare, responsibly engage with, and evolve and integrate AI. These are the: - Chief Data Officer and primary official - Chief Information Officer - Chief Risk Officer. These officials report to our Chair (accountable authority) and convene an AI steering committee (chaired by the Chief Data Officer) to oversee and drive our AI capability maturity. Our AI investment and implementations will be governed through existing transformation and sustainment governance arrangements. ## Use of AI We will consider AI use to provide analytics for and insights into the schemes we regulate on behalf of the Australian Government. We will also consider AI use in the following usage patterns and domains. ### Workplace productivity Show \_\_ - Automation of repetitive tasks - Data-driven decision augmentation - Advancing collaboration - Efficient content creation ### Service delivery Show \_\_ We are already using automation for efficient and effective activities, such as in the: - solar panel verification arrangements for the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme - preload geoprocessing service, that has automated the upload and processing of geospatial datasets for the Australian Carbon Credit Unit Scheme. We will investigate the use of AI to provide further efficiencies in our verification processes. ### Compliance and fraud detection Show \_\_ We will look to use AI to: - monitor for anomalies in usage patterns to detect potential fraudulent activities in the government schemes we administer - continue to analyse AI trends and consider how emerging products and approaches can further strengthen our cyber security posture. For questions or further information about our AI usage, contact [ai@cer.gov.au.](mailto:ai@cer.gov.au)ai/ai-in-government-policy). Staff with access to agency approved enterprise-wide AI systems such as Copilot are required to complete additional training and to read and accept updated ICT conditions of use. Additional specialist training is provided for staff who procure, develop or manage AI systems. ## Legislative, policy and standards commitments Our AI use is governed by Australian Government legislation and policy. We commit to comply with, and be guided by, the following (as applicable): - _Privacy Act 1988_ and the Australian Privacy Principles - _Freedom of Information Act 1982_ - _Archives Act 1983_ - _Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013_ - Protective Security Policy Framework - Information Security Manual - Australia’s AI Ethics Principles - Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government. ## Governance We have matured our governance arrangements to ensure strong oversight of AI, in line with the [Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). - Overall accountability rests with the Clean Energy Regulator Chair, as Accountable Authority. - The Senior Leadership Team provides executive oversight of AI risk, compliance and outcomes. ### Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer In July 2025, we appointed a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to lead AI capability uplift, maturity, and responsible adoption of AI across the agency. The CAIO: - oversees implementation of AI initiatives - provides guidance on risk, ethics, security and compliance in the use of AI - develops and reviews measures to monitor AI effectiveness - ensures our alignment with Australian public service wide AI policy requirements. ### Governance committees All AI initiatives progress through our established governance and change pathways. The Technology Strategy and Change Committee (TSCC) is the primary oversight body for AI across the agency. The TSCC: - provides whole of agency oversight of AI use - advises the Senior Leadership Team on the impacts of AI enabled initiatives - oversees the AI Use Case Suitability Assessment process. The TSCC is chaired by the General Manager of Transformation and Chief Data Officer and includes AI accountable officials as members, providing collective oversight of our AI initiatives. ### Accountable officials Our accountable officials for AI are: - Chief Data Officer - Chief Risk Officer - Chief Information Officer - Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer. These officials share responsibility for: - assessing internal AI proposals - managing risks associated with the use of AI - implementing the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government - ensuring the safe deployment of AI tools - conducting ongoing reviews of the suitability and appropriateness of AI use over time. ## Definition of AI We use the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development definition of AI: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. ## More information For questions about how we use AI, contact [ai@cer.gov.au](mailto:ai@cer.gov.au). ## Find out more Corporate #### Our reports and accountability We …The words that changed
… DPP\ GPO Box 3104\ CANBERRA ACT 2601 This statement was last updatedon 28in February 20246 and will be updated as our approach to AI changes, and at least every 12 months.Rewrites the statement to disclose active AI use for drafting, research and analysis, replacing the earlier claim that no AI applications had been adopted.
read by Claude Opus 5- Removed: statement that the Authority has not adopted any specific AI applications
- Discloses AI use for editing/drafting, policy research, thematic analysis, minutes and transcripts
- Adds commitment that AI is used with human oversight and never alone to make decisions
- Accountable official now the Corporate General Manager (Chief Security Officer title dropped; 28 November 2024 designation date removed)
The words that changed
## Artificial Intelligence Transparency StatementIn accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for responsible use of AI in government(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), this page provides the Climate Change Authority’s statement on the adoption and use of AThis page explains how the Authority is using artificialIintelligence (AI). The Authority’s commitment to digital innovatio, inalignsne with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government StrategyPolicy for responsible use of AI in government(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) (see _adopting emerging technologies_policy/ai/policy). When we referringto AI,the Authority applieswe use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(Opens in … memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en) (OECD) definition of an AI system: _"aA machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer … ems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment_.”_### Accountable Official The Authority’s Corporate General Manager and Chief Security Officer was designated as the accountable official for the Authority under the _Policy for the responsible use of AI iThe Authority’s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies), the [National AI Plan(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan) and the [APS AI Plan 2025(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/what-we-plan-achieve). The Authority commits to using AI in a safe and responsible manner. We use AI with humangovernment_ on 28 November 2024sight and do not rely on AI alone to make decisions.### How we use AIAt this time, the Authority has not adopted any specific AI applications in its operations and has taken steps to ensure that any staff using public generative AI tools do so in accordance with applicable whole of government requiremThe Authority uses AI to support our development of high‑quality, evidence‑based advice to the Australian Government and improve our workplace productivity. In accordance with the [Australian Government’s Classification system for AI use(Opentsand expectations. The Authority sees potential benefits from the adoption of AI in the future and is looking for opportunities to do so safely and responsibly. The Authority, in consultation with the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (as the Authority’s ICT provider), will explore the potential for AI to be used by our staff within the constraints applicable to our ICT systemin a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), our current AI use focuses on scientific, policy, corporate and enabling domains. Examples of how we use AI, with human oversight, include support with editing and drafting documents, assistance with policy research, analysis of structured and unstructured information to identify themes and insights, and support for creating internal administrative content such as minutes and transcripts. The Authority supports staff use of generative AI tools by providing guidance to ensure use is responsible and ethical, and in accordance with relevant legislation and policies.### Public interaction and impact The Authority is committed to ensuring thattheits use of AIhas a positive impact on the environment and public. Any future decisions or outcomes generated by AI that could affect the public or environment will involve human oversight or intervention to ensure fairness and accountability. ### Compliance We comply with alis responsible, environmentally considerate, and in the public interest. The Authority does not currently use any AI systems that directly interact with the public or make decisions that affect individuals without human oversight. ## Monitoring AI effectiveness and impacts The Authority uses AI with human oversight, and staff remain responsible for confirming that AI‑assisted content is accurate and appropriate. AI use must comply with the Authority’s information, privacy and security requirements. ## Governance processes The Authority’s Corporate GeneralmMandatory requirements ofager is designated as the accountable official for AI under the_[Policy for responsible use of AI in government_. We will regularly review our compliance as a part of existing governance, and risk management processes. This transparency statement was made in February 2025. In line with(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Staff must comply with all internal AI policies, which are aligned with broader Australian Government policy requirements and the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s (the Authority’s ICT shared service provider) policies. ## Compliance We comply with all mandatory requirements under the_[Policy for responsible use of AI in government_ it will be updated if our approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months(Opens in a new tab/window)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). We use AI in accordance with applicable legislation and regulation, including (where relevant): - _Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013_ - _Privacy Act 1988_ - _Archives Act 1983_### Contact For further information or enquiries about this statement, … (https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/contact-us "Contact us"). ## AI Transparency statement review and updates Last updated: February 2026 This statement will be reviewed at least annually and updated sooner if our approach to AI changes or if any material change affects the statement’s accuracy. Skip to main content - [AUSTRAC rewrites its statement: discloses enterprise generative AI trials and AI-enabled analytics, adds new usage patterns, domains, governance measures and a policy compliance table.
read by Claude Opus 5- Now discloses trialling enterprise generative AI for productivity and service delivery, plus AI-enabled analytics detecting financial crime indicators
- New 'Compliance with AI in Government Policy' section with a v1.1 compliance table and commitment to implement policy v2.0 from 15 December 2025
- Adds usage patterns Analytics for Insights, Compliance and Fraud Detection, Policy and Legal; adds Service Delivery and Law Enforcement/Intelligence domains as current rather than planned
- Removed: claim that its statistical rules-based modelling and machine learning do not meet the definition of AI
The words that changed
… ns and domains - Data privacy and security - AI safety and governance - Compliance with AI in Government Policy - Contact information ## Introduction AUSTRAC performs a dual role a … unit. This dual role helps to build resilience in the financial system,and enables AUSTRAC to use financial intelligence and regulation to d … e financial reports and information to generate financial intelligence. This financial intelligencewhich contributes to law enforcement and national security investigations. … g technologies are changing the way services are delivered. Criminals and terrorists are always becoming more sophisticated and developing new ways to expl … we will continue to evolve how we work with industry and our partners,and adopt technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) to suppor … AUSTRAC aims to be transparent about the way we use AI in our agency,and how we intend to approach adoption in the future. Where we have d … idelines to ensure we meet the highest standards of security, privacy, accountability and regulatory compliance. Our current approach and intended future u … vance outcomes while ensuring humans remain a key part of the decisiondeploy or engage with new AI technologies across our agency -make a significant change to our approach to AI, or - new factors impact the accuracy of this statement. AUSTRAC’s intelligence functions are part of the nati … National Intelligence (ONI) Act 2018 _._ It should be noted that the _ResponsibleUuse of AI inGgovernmentPpolicy_ specifically exempts AUSTRAC’s intelligence functions from compliance … capabilities or interests. ## How we use AI AUSTRAC defers to the DTAigital Transformation Agency’s definition of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system as: A machine … ns, or decisions, that can influence physical or virtual environments.uses generative AI tools to undertake research and discovery, and formakes limited use of public generative AI tools to support workplace productivitypurposes. This is in alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency(DTA) [ _Interim guidance on government use of’s [ _Staff guidance on public generative AI tools_](https://architecturewww.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-guidance-public-generative-ai).Privacy controls used in these processes are referred to in the relevant section of this statementAUSTRAC applies mandatory protective security controls to ensure that no sensitive or classified information is entered into public generative AI systems, in accordance with the [Protective Security Policy Framework Advisory on OFFICIAL Information Use with Generative Artificial Intelligence](https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/system/files/2025-10/pspf-policy-advisory-information-use-gen-ai.pdf). AUSTRAC has not yet deployedany use ofAI which directly interacts with the public or is involved in decision making and administrative action without human intervention.This includes automated decision making and automated communication with our stakeholders. AUSTRAC is considering the future adoption of AI for the purposes of Workplace ProductivAUSTRAC is currently trialling the use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefitys andAnalytics for Insights. These usage patterns are currently in the pilot stage where they will be evaluated in alignment with the [ _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government_ and internal AUSTRAC AI Policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) Upon adoption, AUSTRAC will not use these AI methods without human interventionrisks of this emerging technology. This includes internal tools to improve workplace productivity and tools to support service delivery. As we continue to expand our use of AI, AUSTRAC will ensure we utilise the technology with clear human oversight, monitoring and decision making.also utilises statistical rules-based modelling and machine learning to: - identify indicators of money laundering, terrorism financing, or financially enabled crime - support our financial intelligence analysts to generate actionable financial intelligence for our partners. These methods do not meet the definition of AI due the rules-based nature of the inputs to these techniques, which are determined by humanleverages AI internally to enhance the effectiveness of our compliance and intelligence capabilities. AUSTRAC also utilises AI-enabled analytics to help detect indicators of financial crime and support analysts to generate insights for partners. Over the next2years, AUSTRAC will implement the AML/CTF Reform priorities and deliver on our data and digital transformation priorities.To support this work, we are actively looking at opportunities to leverage generative AI tools to uplift our regulatory, intelligence and corporate operationsAUSTRAC remains committed to upholding the highest standards of security, accountability, and integrity while responsibly exploring AI. We will leverage these technologies to enhance our regulatory, intelligence and corporate operations in line with public expectations and with an eye to innovation and technological advancement. ## Usage patterns and domains The [ _Policy for Responsible Use of … current AI usage patterns are: - **Workplace Productivity:** Used to improve process efficiencies such as supporting non-sensitive researchthrough the collation of publicly available information. AUSTRAC’s current AI domains are: - **Corporate and Enabling:** Supports corporate functions to improve operational efficiency and productivity. AUSTRAC is currently developing and piloting uses of AI which will in the future: - **Expand usage patterns** to include: - **Analytics for Insights** to identify, produce and understand insights within structured or unstructured materials\*\*,\*\* basic secretariat support and facilitating communications. - **Analytics for Insights:** Used to identify, produce and understand indicators of financial crime. AUSTRAC’s current AI domains are: - **Corporate and Enabling:** Supports corporate functions to improve operational efficiency and productivity. - **Service Delivery:** Provides tailored and responsive support by assisting staff who deliver these services. - **Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security:** Support law enforcement and intelligence agencies through AI-enabled analysis of data which aids intelligence gathering. AUSTRAC is currently developing and piloting uses of AI which will impact or expand\*\*\*\* the following\*\*\*\* AI usage patterns: - **Workplace Productivity:**to include virtual assistants. - **Expand domains** to include: - **Service Delivery** to provide tailored and responsive services directly to external and internal stakeholders, through supporting staff who deliver these serviceSupport the development of intelligence products to improve operational efficiency. - **Compliance and Fraud Detection:** Identify patterns or anomalies in data to detect indicators of fraudulent activities and ensure compliance with laws and regulations.Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security** to support law enforcement and intelligence agencies through AI-enabled analysis of data from various sources which aid intelligence gatheringPolicy and Legal:** Support generating summaries and drafts to assist legal reviews of documents and preparation of internal documents. ## Data privacy and security Protecting the privacy and security o … us. We ensure that data is handled in compliance with the applicable Australian legislationsand regulations;including the _Privacy Act 1988edion, usaged, andshadisclosured, where necessary in line with our privacy policies and the Australian Privacy Principles. In accordance with internal guidelines and policies, staff who use … veal any classified, personal or otherwise sensitive information. All AUSTRAC activitieswill align withthat use, or intend to use, AI will be subject to appropriate privacy assurance to ensure they comply with all relevant Australian legislation and policies relating to information and data. ## AI saf … d Analytics Officer). AUSTRAC is committed to implementing AI systemstowhich align with evolving legislation, ethical standards, and public expect … AI is guided by the following key principles: - **Enable** : AUSTRACwill engage with AI in safe, ethical and responsible ways, including establishing clear accountabilities for AI adoption, use and explainability. - **Engage responsibly** : AUSTRAC will ensure AI use is ethical, responsible, transparent and explainable, and that proportionate and targeted risk mitigations are applied forstrategically adopts AI to support its mission of protecting Australia’s financial system. We ensure that AI enhances decision-making, supports our analytical and regulatory capability and aligns with our purpose and public expectations. - **Engage** : AUSTRAC uses AI in ethical, transparent and fair ways that protect individuals, uphold public confidence and reinforce democratic values. We priorities risk mitigation, explainability and fairness in all AI usecases. - **Evolve** : AUSTRACwill apply flexibility and adaptability to AI uses to accommodate technological advances, including ongoing review and evaluation of existing AI use cases and exploration of new approachesembraces learning and innovation by continuously improving our application of AI through adaptive policies, collaboration and evaluation. To further support these efforts, AUSTRAC has established governance practices, policies and guidance to ensure the ethical, transparent,and secure implementationand useof AI. This includes: - AUSTRAC’s AI Policy, AI Governance Framework, and AI guidanceto staff relating to use of information technology systems and AI, inclusive of public generative AI tools. - Availability of AI training for all staff. These are supported by internal governance committees and whole-of-government guidance, ensuring staff use AI safely and responsibly. - All staff must complete trainings which build capability in the appropriate use of AI systems and handling of security classified information. - Internal data and information governance forums that monitor AI performance, accountability, security and risk. - Adherence to records management standards to enablsure appropriateuse of AI systemdocumentation, retention and traceability of AI-related activities. As the use of AI within AUSTRAC expands, consideration will be giv … nce processes and practices which will ensure the appropriate, ethical,and safe use of AI. ## Compliance with AI in Government Policy Under the [ _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) (AI in government Policy) and the [ _standards for transparency statements_](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) \_\_ we are required to report our compliance with the requirements under the policy. At time of publishing, this section is compliant with version 1.1 of the AI in government policy. Version 2.0 of the policy introduces new requirements from the 15th December, 2025 which AUSTRAC is committed to implementing. The following table outlines the requirements of version 1.1 of the AI in government policy and the status of compliance with those requirements: **Requirement** | **Status**\ ---|---\ Accountable Official | Compliant\ AI Transparency Statement | Compliant ## Contact information We will regularly review and update our AI p … ludes staying informed about new developments in AI technology, ethics,and regulatory requirements. We will strive to improve the transparency, fairness,and effectiveness of our use of AI systems through continuous learning and adaptation. This statement was last updated on28 February12 December 2025 and will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI,or when new factors impact this statement. If you have questions, concerns or would like more information about how AUSTRAC uses AI, [contact us … o account when determining how the law applies to you. Last updated:27 Feb9 Jan 20256 Page ID: 1173 ## Was this page helpful? Was this page helpful? Wa … (https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/our-people/organisational-chart)- [AML/CTF Reform](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform) - [About the reforms](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/about-reforms) - [Check if you may be regulated (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/check-if-you-may-be-regulated-reform) - [Reforms guidance](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance) - [Before you start](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start) - [Check if you'll be regulated](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/check-if-you-may-be-regulated-reform) - [New industries and services to be regulated (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/new-industries-and-services-be-regulated-reform) - [Real estate services (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/new-industries-and-services-be-regulated-reform/real-estate-services-reform) - [Precious metals, stones and products services (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/new-industries-and-services-be-regulated-reform/precious-metals-stones-and-products-services-reform) - [Virtual asset services (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/new-industries-and-services-be-regulated-reform/virtual-asset-services-reform) - [Professional services (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/new-industries-and-services-be-regulated-reform/professional-services-reform) - [Combating money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/combating-money-laundering-terrorism-financing-and-proliferation-financing) - [Money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing definitions](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/combating-money-laundering-terrorism-financing-and-proliferation-financing/money-laundering-terrorism-financing-and-proliferation-financing-definitions) - [Learn how to use this guidance (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/learn-how-use-guidance-reform) - [Summary of AML/CTF obligations for tranche 2 entities](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/summary-obligations-reform) - [Summary of changes for current reporting entities](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/summary-changes-current-reporting-entities-reform) - [Find out when to enrol and register (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/find-out-when-enrol-and-register-reform) - [Enrol with us (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/find-out-when-enrol-and-register-reform/enrol-us-reform) - [Register with us as a remittance or virtual asset service provider (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/before-you-start/find-out-when-enrol-and-register-reform/register-us-remittance-or-virtual-asset-service-provider-reform) - [AML/CTF program (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform) - [Develop your AML/CTF program (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform) - [Your AML/CTF program (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/your-amlctf-program-reform) - [Step 1: Establish your governance framework (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform) - [Governing body (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform/governing-body-reform) - [Senior manager (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform/senior-manager-reform) - [AML/CTF compliance officer (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform/amlctf-compliance-officer-reform) - [Governance and oversight for sole traders and micro businesses (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform/governance-and-oversight-sole-traders-and-micro-businesses-reform) - [Establishing a strong AML/CTF culture (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-1-establish-your-governance-framework-reform/establishing-strong-amlctf-culture-reform) - [Step 2: Identify and assess your risks: risk assessment (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-2-identify-and-assess-your-risks-risk-assessment-reform) - [Step 3: Mitigate and manage your risks - AML/CTF policies (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-3-mitigate-and-manage-your-risks-amlctf-policies-reform) - [Step 4: Review and update your AML/CTF program (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-4-review-and-update-your-amlctf-program-reform) - [Step 5: Conduct an independent evaluation (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/step-5-conduct-independent-evaluation-reform) - [Record keeping (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/record-keeping-reform) - [Record keeping overview (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/record-keeping-reform/record-keeping-overview-reform) - [Record keeping checklist (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/record-keeping-reform/record-keeping-checklist-reform) - [Record keeping in ADI authorised account transfers (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/record-keeping-reform/record-keeping-adi-authorised-account-transfers-reform) - [Record keeping in correspondent banking relationships (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/develop-your-amlctf-program-reform/record-keeping-reform/record-keeping-correspondent-banking-relationships-reform) - [Customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Overview of customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/overview-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Initial customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Overview of initial customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/overview-initial-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Initial customer due diligence guides by customer type (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform) - [Initial CDD for individuals (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform/initial-cdd-individuals-reform) - [Initial CDD for sole traders (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform/initial-cdd-sole-traders-reform) - [Initial CDD for a body corporate, partnership or unincorporated association (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform/initial-cdd-body-corporate-partnership-or-unincorporated) - [Initial CDD for a trust (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform/initial-cdd-trust-reform) - [Initial CDD for a government body (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-guides-customer-type-reform/initial-cdd-government-body-reform) - [Delayed initial customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/delayed-initial-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Identifying individuals who don’t have standard identification (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/identifying-individuals-who-dont-have-standard-identification-reform) - [Alternative identification for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/identifying-individuals-who-dont-have-standard-identification-reform/alternative-identification-aboriginal-and-torres-strait) - [Examples of using alternative identification procedures (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/initial-customer-due-diligence-reform/identifying-individuals-who-dont-have-standard-identification-reform/examples-using-alternative-identification-procedures) - [Assigning customer risk ratings (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/assigning-customer-risk-ratings-reform) - [Reliance on customer identification by a third party (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform) - [Overview of reliance on customer identification by a third party (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform/overview-reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform) - [Reliance under customer due diligence arrangements (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform/reliance-under-customer-due-diligence-arrangements-reform) - [Reliance on a case-by-case basis (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform/reliance-case-case-basis-reform) - [Managing risk and assessing foreign jurisdictions for reliance (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/reliance-customer-identification-third-party-reform/managing-risk-and-assessing-foreign-jurisdictions-reliance-reform) - [Enhanced customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/enhanced-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Ongoing customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [Overview of ongoing customer due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform/overview-ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform) - [What you must monitor for (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform/what-you-must-monitor-reform) - [How to monitor your customers (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform/how-monitor-your-customers-reform) - [Responding to unusual transactions and behaviour (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform/responding-unusual-transactions-and-behaviour-reform) - [Reviewing and updating customers’ ML/TF risk and KYC information (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/ongoing-customer-due-diligence-reform/reviewing-and-updating-customers-mltf-risk-and-kyc-information-reform) - [Politically exposed persons (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/politically-exposed-persons-reform) - [Persons designated for targeted financial sanctions (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/persons-designated-targeted-financial-sanctions-reform) - [Source of funds and source of wealth (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/source-funds-and-source-wealth-reform) - [Transitioning existing customers (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/customer-due-diligence-reform/transitioning-existing-customers-reform) - [Personnel due diligence and training (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/personnel-due-diligence-and-training-reform) - [Identifying personnel roles that require due diligence and training (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/personnel-due-diligence-and-training-reform/identifying-personnel-roles-require-due-diligence-and-training-reform) - [Personnel due diligence (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/personnel-due-diligence-and-training-reform/personnel-due-diligence-reform) - [AML/CTF training (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/personnel-due-diligence-and-training-reform/amlctf-training-reform) - [Examples of personnel due diligence and training in practice (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/personnel-due-diligence-and-training-reform/examples-personnel-due-diligence-and-training-practice-reform) - [Reporting to AUSTRAC (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/reporting-austrac-reform) - [Suspicious matter reports (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/reporting-austrac-reform/suspicious-matter-reports-reform) - [Threshold transaction reports (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/reporting-austrac-reform/threshold-transaction-reports-reform) - [International funds transfer instruction (IFTI) reports](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/core-guidance/reporting/money-transferred-and-overseas-international-funds-transfer-instruction-ifti-reports) - [Cross-border movement reports – guidance for reporting entities (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/reporting-austrac-reform/cross-border-movement-reports-guidance-reporting-entities-reform) - [Compliance reports](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/core-guidance/reporting/austrac-compliance-reports) - [Legal professional privilege (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/amlctf-program-reform/reporting-austrac-reform/legal-professional-privilege-reform) - [Tipping off](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/current-reporting-entities/tipping) - [Other guidance](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance) - [Determining ownership and control structures (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/determining-ownership-and-control-structures-reform) - [Reporting groups (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/reporting-groups-reform) - [Understanding reporting groups (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/reporting-groups-reform/understanding-reporting-groups-reform) - [Forming reporting groups (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/reporting-groups-reform/forming-reporting-groups-reform) - [Obligations for lead entities and members (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/reporting-groups-reform/obligations-lead-entities-and-members-reform) - [The travel rule (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform) - [When the travel rule doesn’t apply (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/when-travel-rule-doesnt-apply-reform) - [Travel rule overview (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/travel-rule-overview-reform) - [Travel rule obligations for ordering institutions (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/travel-rule-obligations-ordering-institutions-reform) - [Travel rule obligations for intermediary institutions (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/travel-rule-obligations-intermediary-institutions-reform) - [Travel rule obligations for beneficiary institutions (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/travel-rule-obligations-beneficiary-institutions-reform) - [Additional travel rule obligations when transferring virtual assets (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/travel-rule-reform/additional-travel-rule-obligations-when-transferring-virtual-assets-reform) - [Foreign branches and subsidiaries (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/foreign-branches-and-subsidiaries-reform) - [Using outsourcing to help meet your AML/CTF obligations (Reform)](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/using-outsourcing-help-meet-your-amlctf-obligations-reform) - [Repeal of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/repeal-financial-transaction-reports-act-1988) - [New information gathering powers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/reforms-guidance/other-guidance/new-information-gathering-powers) - [Risks and indicators of suspicious activity](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/risks-and-indicators-suspicious-activity) - [Risk insights for virtual asset service providers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-guidance-and-resources/guidance-resources/risk-insights-virtual-asset-service-providers) - [Risk insights and indicators of suspicious activity for accountants](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-guidance-and-resources/guidance-resources/risk-insights-and-indicators-suspicious-activity-accountants) - [Risk insights and indicators of suspicious activity for legal professionals](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-guidance-and-resources/guidance-resources/risk-insights-and-indicators-suspicious-activity-legal-professionals) - [Risk insights and indicators of suspicious activity for the real estate sector](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-guidance-and-resources/guidance-resources/risk-insights-and-indicators-suspicious-activity-real-estate-sector) - [Risk insights and indicators of suspicious activity for dealers in precious stones, metals and other products](https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-guidance-and-resources/guidance-resources/risk-insights-and-indicators-suspicious-activity-dealers-precious-stones-metals-and-other-products) - [What’s coming soon to help you](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/whats-coming-soon-help-you) - [Preparing for the changes as a current reporting entity](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/preparing-changes-current-reporting-entity) - [Preparing for the changes if you’re newly regulated](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/preparing-changes-if-youre-newly-regulated) - [AUSTRAC regulatory expectations and priorities for 2025–26](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/austrac-regulatory-expectations-and-priorities-2025-26) - [Future Law Compilation of the AML/CTF Act](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/future-law-compilation-amlctf-act) - [Education about reforms](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/education-about-reforms) - [For current reporting entities](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/current-reporting-entities) - [Tipping off](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/current-reporting-entities/tipping) - [New AML/CTF Rules](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/amlctf-reform/new-amlctf-rules)- [Careers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/work-with-austrac) - [Current …Swaps its accountable official from the Chief Operating Officer to the Chief Information Officer and says its mandatory AI training is now built, minus members.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable official changed from Chief Operating Officer to Chief Information Officer
- "Safe use of AI" training now delivered rather than under development
- Removed: members from the group required to do the mandatory training
- Last updated date moved to 2 January 2026
The words that changed
… policy on the use of AI. #### Training and assistance The Tribunalis currently developing mandatoryhas developed "safe use of AI" trainingfor members,which is mandatory for staff, contractors and consultants. The Tribunal Enterprise Technolog … - The Tribunal’s accountable official under the policy is the ChiefOperInformationgOfficer (COIO). - The COIO engages with the Senior Management Committee and Principal Registrar … ial engagement via this account will be ignored. Date last updated: 24 November 2025. \_\_January 2026.The words that changed
… /corporate-publications/quarterly-reports "Quarterly Report series") - [Quarterly Report - April to June 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-april-june-2025 "Quarterly Report - April to June 2025") - [Quarterly Report - January to March 2025](https://www.arpansa.gov.au/about-us/corporate-publications/quarterly-report-series/quarterly-report-january-march-2025 "Quarterly Report - January to March 2025") - [Quarterly Report - October to December 2024](https://www.arpansa. …The scraped URL now returns the museum's governance page instead of its reports and policies page; no AI statement text changed.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
  # Reports, policies and plansReports, policies and plans ## Strategic framework Download the [2023-27 Strategic Framework](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-08/anmm-strategic-framework-for-online-v2.pdf). ## Corporate plan Download the [2025-26 Corporate plan](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-08/corporate-plan-2025-26.pdf). ## Annual reports Download and read the museum's annual reports. 2024-2025 2023-2024 2022-2023 2021-2022 2020-2021 2019-2020 2018-2019 2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 ## APS Census **2025 APS Employee Survey Results & Action Plan – Coming soon** Download the [2024 APS Employee Survey Results](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-11/aps01807-anmm-redacted.pdf) Download the [2024 APS Census Action Plan](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024-census-action-plan-2024-for-website.pdf) Download the [2023 APS Employee Survey Results](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/2023-aps-employee-survey-results.pdf) Download the [2023 APS Census Action Plan](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/2023-anmm-census-action-plan.pdf) ## Procedures for determining breaches of the APS Code of Conduct [Download](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-06/procedures-for-determining-breaches-of-the-code-of-conduct_9-april-2025.pdf) ## Privacy policy As a Commonwealth Government agency, the Museum is obliged to comply with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). All information and images on this website are the copyright of the Australian National Maritime Museum and may not be reproduced without the written consent of the museum. The privacy of your personal information is important to us and your name, contact details and other information will not be provided to any other person or organisation without your knowledge and consent unless required by law. Please contact us to update your details if your name, address or phone number changes. You may request that your details are removed from our database and mailing lists at any time. [Download PDF](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-09/anmm-privacy-policy-2023.pdf) [Read online](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/corporate-information/legals/privacy/privacy-policy) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/corporate-information/legals/privacy/privacy-policy) ## Privacy Impact Assessment Register Under section 15(1) of the Privacy (Australian Government Agencies – Governance) APP Code 2017 (Privacy Code), the museum is required to “maintain a register of the Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) it conducts. An agency must publish the register, or a version of the register, on its website”. The museum’s PIA Register is shown below. ID: PIA001\ Project Name: Welcome Wall 2.0\ Date: 16/1/2019 ## Policies Download the [Collection Development Policy Framework and Priorities](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-01/collection-development-policy-framework-priorities.pdf) Download the [Investment Strategy Policy ](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-01/investment-strategy-policy-september-2024.pdf) ## AI Transparency Statement [Download](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-06/ai-transparency-statement-april-2025.pdf) ## 2024 - 2027 Disability Inclusion Action Plan The Australian National Maritime Museum’s Disability Inclusion Action Plan (DIAP) 2024 – 2027 sets out clear actions to inspire positive change to empower and engage audiences, collaborators, and Museum workers so that all Australians can connect with conversations about the unique role of our waterways and oceans in the past, present and future of this nation shaped by sea. Download the [Disability Inclusion Action Plan](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-08/anmm-disability-inclusion-action-plan-2024-27.pdf) [Accessibility at the museum](https://www.sea.museum/en/visit/plan-your-visit/accessibility) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/visit/plan-your-visit/accessibility) ## Reconciliation Action Plan The museum's Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP), a strategic plan which sets out the museum's commitment to recognise, appreciate and celebrate our country's rich and unique Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander cultures and cultural heritages across every facet of the organisation. Download the [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-09/reconciliation-action-plan-2021-23.pdf)  ## Information Publication Plan The Australian National Maritime Museum’s Information Publication Plan outlines what information the museum proposes to publish, how and to whom the information will be published, and how the requirements of the Freedom Of Information Act are complied with. The Australian National Maritime Museum (the Museum) is an agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) and it is required to comply with its Information Publication Scheme (IPS) provisions. About this plan Purpose Objectives Establishing and administering the IPS entry Structure of the IPS Information Required to be Published Under the IPS (S 8(2) Other Information to be Published (S 8(4) Accessibility under the IPS IPS compliance review (S 8F) and other reviews Contacting the Museum About its Information and IPS Entry ## Freedom of information [Find out more about FOI requests](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/freedom-of-information) ## Order a Hard Copy For a copy of published documents, please contact our Publications Manager: Phone: +61 2 9298 3777\ Email: [publications@sea.museum](mailto:publications@sea.museum)  ## Collection Development Policy Framework and Priorities Download the [Collection Development Policy Framework and Priorities](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-01/collection-development-policy-framework-priorities.pdf)Photo showing a museum gallery with small wooden sailing ships. ](https://www.sea.museum/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms-web.seamuseum.net%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fultra_horizontal%2Fpublic%2Ffotoweb%2F2024-09%2FANMM12_0702002.TIF%3Fitok%3DsnEmy0qN&w=3840&q=75)  # GovernanceGovernance ## The Australian National Maritime Museum connects Australians with the past, present and future of our oceans and waterways. The museum is committed to meeting the needs and requirements of Government, our visitors and stakeholders. This page outlines the governance systems and processes at the museum. ## Legislation and Government The museum is a Corporate Commonwealth Entity within the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts. This section outlines the key pieces of legislation which define the functions and activities of the museum. Australian National Maritime Museum Act 1990 Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 Public Service Act 1999 Statement of expectations Statement of intent ## Council and committees [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/museum-council "Museum Council") pages ### [Museum Council](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/museum-council) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/audit-finance-and-risk-committee "Audit Finance and Risk Committee") pages ### [Audit Finance and Risk Committee](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/audit-finance-and-risk-committee) [](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/first-nations-advisory-committee "First Nations Advisory Committee") pages ### [First Nations Advisory Committee](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/first-nations-advisory-committee) ## Reports and plans Strategic Framework Corporate Plan Annual reports APS Census and action plan Procedures for determining breaches of the APS Code of conduct AI Transparency Statement Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2024-2027 Reconciliation Action Plan Information Publication Plan ## Policies and procedures [Child safety and wellbeing policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4340) [Collection development policy framework and priorities](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3392) [Complaints handling procedure](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3341) [Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/1182) [Investment strategy policy ](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/3393) [Partnership and sponsorship policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4341) [Privacy policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/1964) [Social media policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4338) [Volunteer policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4332) [Work health and safety policy](https://www.sea.museum/en/media/4339) For further information or to request access to other museum policies, please email [anmmcoord@sea.museum](mailto:anmmcoord@sea.museum)  Photo by: Jasmine Poole  Photo by: Anthony Smith Media  Photo by: Lauren Trompp  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Brendon Thorne  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovshi 1 - 8 ## Access to information ### Freedom of Information The Australian National Maritime Museum is a Commonwealth statutory authority and makes information about its activities available to the public in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, 1982 (FOI Act). [Freedom of Information](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/freedom-of-information) ### Published File List File list for [1 July to 31 December 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2026-02/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2025.pdf) (pdf, 71kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-08/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2025.pdf) (pdf, 73kb) File list for [1 July to 31 December 2024](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-02/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2024.pdf) (pdf, 71kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2024](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2025-02/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2024.pdf) (pdf, 76kb) File list for [1 July to 31 December 2023](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/file-list-for-1-july-to-31-dec-2023.pdf) (pdf, 70kb)\ File list for [1 January to 30 June 2023](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2024-10/file-list-for-1-jan-to-30-june-2023.pdf) (pdf, 436kb) ### Public Interest Disclosures The Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (PID Act) which commenced on 15 January 2014 promotes integrity and accountability in the Australian public sector by encouraging the disclosure of information about suspected wrongdoing, protecting people who make disclosures and requiring agencies to take action. [Public Interest Disclosures](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/public-interest-disclosures) ### Gifts and benefits register Agency heads must publish a register of gifts and benefits they accept on their agency website on a quarterly basis. [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.sea.museum/en/about/governance/gifts-and-benefits-register) ## Contracts Under the Senate Order for entity contracts, the following document sets out contracts entered into by the Australian National Maritime Museum that provide for a consideration to the value of $100,000 or more (GST inclusive) [Entity Contracts listing for 1 Jan to 30 Dec 2025](https://cms-web.seamuseum.net/sites/default/files/2026-02/reportable-contracts-list-jan-dec-2025.pdf) ## Privacy Impact Assessment Register Under section 15(1) of the Privacy (Australian Government Agencies – Governance) APP Code 2017 (Privacy Code), the museum is required to “maintain a register of the Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) it conducts. An agency must publish the register, or a version of the register, on its website”. The museum’s PIA Register is shown below.\ ID: PIA001\ Project Name: Welcome Wall 2.0\ Date: 16/1/2019  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley  Photo by: Brendon Thorne  Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Lauren Trompp  Photo by: Cassandra Hannagan Photography   Photo by: Marinco Kojdanovski  Photo by: Rhiannon Hopley 1 - 8Halves its review cadence, moving from twice-yearly to annual reviews and pushing the next scheduled review from August 2025 to March 2026.
read by Claude Opus 5- Review cadence changed from twice-annually to annually
- Next scheduled review moved from 20 August 2025 to 13 March 2026
The words that changed
… ## **Review and updates** This AI transparency statement is reviewedtwice-annually or when significant changes occur. The latest review was conducted on 13 March 2025, with the next scheduled review on20 August13 March 20256. ## **Contact** For questions or feedback regarding AIHW’s AI trans …AEC appoints its Chief Information Officer as Chief AI Officer, discloses Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff, and confirms voting and counting stay manual.
read by Claude Opus 5- Chief Information Officer appointed Chief AI Officer, per the APS AI Plan, alongside the existing AI Accountable Official
- New disclosure: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat enabled for all staff, with assurances it doesn't replace staff and isn't used to train models
- New statement that key election operations, including voting and counting, are done manually under electoral law
- Added claim that Copilot speeds high-volume manual tasks, freeing staff for higher-value work
The words that changed
Classification: OFFICIAL Australian Electoral Commission Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement\Background The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) notes the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (the Policy) requires that relevant agencies, including the AEC, release a transparency statement providing information about their use of AI.\Consistent with the Policy, the AEC has provided the Digital Transformation Agency a link to this statement on the AEC website.\The Policy also requires the AEC to nominate an accountable official for the implementation of the Policy. The AEC’saAI AccountableoOfficial is the First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation\• not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without human review • understand safe and responsible use of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework • not use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to assess potential AI tools for use based on the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. The AEC’s use of AI includes: • GitHub Copilot - GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed to improve productivity and efficiency of software application development. • Microsoft 365 Copilot - The AEC is conducting a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed\speech-to-text software along with a limited number of staff in our graphical design area who use AI to generate educational images. OFFICIAL Key election operations – including voting and the counting process – are undertaken manually, in accordance with electoral law. The AEC uses AI in the following domain and usage pattern: • Domain: Corporate and enabling. The AEC’s current use relates to supporting corporate functions and improving operational efficiency. • Usage pattern: Workplace productivity. The AEC’s current use is for workplace productivity purposes. This includes summarising and analysing data and information, automating or reducing time spent on administrative tasks and supporting software application development. More information about usage patterns and domains is available at Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.auOFFICIALIdentifying and protecting against risks to electoral integrity The AEC acknowledges the transformative potential of AI for society and government, including operational efficiencies and enhanced data analysis. The 2024 Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot showed productivity improvements but also highlighted barriers, concerns, and risks associated with AI in government. Public trust in the AEC is crucial for maintaining confidence in electoral processes and results, which is essential for defending Australia's democracy. In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, meeting community and stakeholder expectations is increasingly complex. To maintain public confidence, the AEC emphasises the importance of transparency in how AI is used in its operations, security, and information systems as detailed above in "The AEC’s use of AI”. Third-party suppliers The AEC has processes in place to manage the potential use of AI by third-party suppliers. Agreements with third party providers contain confidentiality requirements that the provider is contractually required to adhere to. Where applicable, the AEC additionally requires all relevant provider personnel are Australian citizens and may require that personnel possess Australian Government security clearances at a level the AEC deems appropriate per-role.\For applicable agreements (i.e. managed service arrangements), the AEC contractually requires that AEC data remains onshore in Australia.\In cases where the provider is delivering an IT capability that processes AEC data, such solutions are subject to the AEC’s review and approval through its governance processes. Any potential utilisation of AI as part of such solutions would be identified as part of this process, including with respect to potential data sovereignty issues. Governance and legislation Governance Structure Senior Executive Committee (SEC): • overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and agency direction • chaired by the Australian Electoral Commissioner OFFICIAL • approves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with the Investment Committee. Investment Committee: • security and risk considerations relating to AI use • strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI use. Advisory Audit Committee: • established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act). Compliance with Legislation and Regulation • Privacy Act 1988: Regulates the collection, storage, and use of personal information by AI • Archives Act 1983: Governs records created by AIOFFICIAL• Freedom of Information Act 1982: Provides public access to documents created by AI. Oversight and Audits • Compliance overseen by the SEC. • Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance. • The Regulatory Action Plan guides the AEC's approach to regulatory compliance, including application of the new AI Policy. Updates to this statement Consistent with the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, this statement will be updated at least once a year, oraswhen the AEC’makes a substantial change to the agency's approach to AIchanges or evolves, or when any new factor materially impacts the existing statement's accuracy. This statement was updated on25 September9 February 20256 and is authorised by AEC’s AI Accountable Officer. Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.auThe words that changed
… oach to AI. [ Next up: Compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–26\_\_](https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities)- Clean Energy Regulatorfirst tracked
- Australian National Maritime Museumfirst tracked
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfarefirst tracked
The words that changed
… GPO Box 1252\ CANBERRA ACT 2601\ Australia Skip to main content - [teamspeople "Our teams") - [The Reef Authority adds commitments on AI embedded in commercial software and human oversight, and refreshes its statement to November 2025.
read by Claude Opus 5- New commitments on AI embedded in commercial software: monitoring authorised software, staff education, human oversight and quality assurance of outputs, and staff reporting of AI features
- Adds 'appropriate human oversight and intervention' to its safe and responsible use commitment
- Statement date updated from 20 February 2025 to November 2025
- Still discloses no current AI use
The words that changed
## AI transparency statement In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’'s (DTA) \[Policy for the responsible use of AI in government\](https:/ … responsible use of AI in government v1.1.pdf), this page provides theReefGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’'s (Reef Authority) statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency. The Reef Auth … ge, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW), and the Reef Authority’'s AI Transparency Statement has been adapted from that of DCCEEW to ensure alignment in the responsible use and governance of AI. . The Reef Authority sees potential benefits from the application of AI in the future. The Reef Authority’'s commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’'s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dta.gov.au/digita … he Reef Authority commits to using AI in a safe and responsible manner, with appropriate human oversight and intervention. ### How we use AI The Reef Authorityidoes not currentlyusingdeploy AI acrossany of itsits operational domains. Any future uses of AI by the Reef Authority would be documented infuturesubsequent iterations of the AI Transparency Statement and wouldbe based onalign with the Australian Government’'s classification system, see Classification system for AI use on the [DTA[Artificial intelligence in government page](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)page. The Reef Authority acknowledges that AI capabilities are increasingly embedded within commercial software and productivity tools. As the integration of AI features within software continues to evolve, the Reef Authority maintains a commitment to: - Ongoing monitoring and evaluation of authorised software to identify embedded AI functionality. - Providing education and guidance to staff regarding the identification and responsible use of AI features. - Ensuring staff maintain appropriate human oversight and quality assurance of all outputs. - Encouraging staff to report identified AI features to support organisational awareness and transparency. ### Public interaction and impact The Reef Authority is committed … esk@gbrmpa.gov.au). ### AI Transparency Statement The Reef Authority’'s AI Transparency Statement was last updatedoin20 FebruaryNovember 2025. In line with the \[Policy for responsible use of AI in governme … ) this AI Transparency Statement will be updated if the Reef Authority’'s approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months. Created Tue, 2025-02-25 11:21 Updated 25 Feb0 Nov 2025DFAT rewrites its statement, naming its AI usage types and domains, the CIO as accountable official, human-in-the-loop oversight and annual review, while dropping the Copilot trial.
read by Claude Opus 5- Discloses AI usage types (analytics, workplace productivity, image processing) and domains (service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, corporate and enabling)
- Names the Chief Information Officer as responsible for whole-of-government AI policy compliance, replacing vague 'relevant personnel'
- Adds commitment to human oversight ('Human-in-the-Loop') and an Accountable Use Case Owner for each AI use
- Adds review cadence: statement updated at least every twelve months
The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement DFAT isinvestigating how AI can be useddedicated to identifying and adopting emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), to enhance secure business outcomes.EWe embracinge new opportunities,whileacknowledgrecognising the uncertainties and risksof new technologies, DFAT has adopted the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). The DTA's Policy for tthat come with technological change. This public transparency statement outlines DFAT’s approach to AI. Safe and responsible use of AI is a guiding principle for AI use in DFAT. We comply with relevant legislation, regulations, guidance, and apply best practice whesponsible use of AI in government establisheapplicable. ## Our approach to AI DFAT uses both automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to strengthen our operationsmandatory requirements relating to identifying [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials) and publicly publishing DFAT's AI uses in [AI transparency statedeliver better outcomes. We follow the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles) of AI, in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in governments](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement explains how DFAT is adhering to policy requirements. Safe, secure,policy). At DFAT, "AI" refers to applications of machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI. Rule-based analytics and rule-based automation are managed separately and aresponsible use of AI is a guiding principle for AI use in DFAT. ## Approach to using AI **Public access**. Currently, the public are not provided access to any DFAT AI toolsnot considered AI under this definition. Our people are central to the safe and effective use of AI at DFAT. We are committed to equipping ourthe ability to contribute to outputs. **Departmental use**. DFAT's internal use of AI is based on policy and guidelines developed by DTA, Department of Industry, Science and Resources, CSIRO, and international bstaff with the skills and knowledge needed to implement, maintain, and use AI responsibly. Comprehensive training ensures our workforce can confidently manage their use of AI, uphold ethical standards, and support secure businests practices.DFAT is part of the Whole of Australian Government Copilot trial. DFAT is reviewing the use of AI across service delivery, scientific, and corporate and enabling domains for relevant areas for insights into automating processes and identifying efficiencies. All staff are required to undertake training on the appropriate use of AI prior to enabling their access. General queries or concerns are encouraged to be reported through a dedicated internal channel. ## AI safety and governance DFAT has internal governance, policy and instructions toBy combining advanced technology with a skilled and informed workforce, DFAT aims to harness the benefits of AI while maintaining the highest standards or safety, transparency, and accountability. Based on the classification system for AI in government, we are using AI in: - analytics for insights - workplace productivity - image processing. We are applying AI in the following domains: - service delivery - compliance and fraud detection - policy and legal - corporate and enabling. ## AI safety and governance DFAT has internal governance for AI, covering every stage from initial idea to implementation. Our processes ensure: - AI is implemented and used safely and responsibly -monitoring of effectiveness of AI - legal and regulatory compliance - identification of any negative impacts of AI - measures to mitigate potential harm from AI. This transparency statement will be updated as DFAT's approach to AI changes. ## Accountable officials DFAT has identified relevant personnel to be accountable for DFATcontinuously monitoring how AI performs - meeting all legal and regulatory obligations - identifying risks and potential negative impacts - taking action to reduce or prevent harm. Each AI use case is assigned an Accountable Use Case Owner to oversee its management. Risks are assessed before implementation and reviewed regularly, with governance processes updated as needed to remain effective. DFAT only uses AI in ways that protect security, privacy, transparency, and ethical use, always maintaining human oversight (‘Human-in-the-Loop’). All staff must complete training on the responsible use of AI before they are granted access. Staff are encouraged to raise questions or report concerns through a dedicated internal channel. Currently, the Chief Information Officer is responsible for ensuring DFAT complies with whole-of-government AI policies and maintains the quality and integrity of departmental data. This transparency statement will be updated as our approach evolves, and at least every twelve months. Update Date| Update Comment\ ---|---\ 29 November 2024| Designation … v.au/policy/ai/policy) (ver. 1.1), responsible use of AI in government 3 December 2025| - Transparency statement updateThe words that changed
… vice "2035 Emissions Reduction Targets Advice") - [ Annual ProgressAdviceReport ](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/annual-progress-report "Annual ProgressAdviceReport") - [ ACCU Scheme Reviews ](https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov. …Austrade changes its designated Accountable Official for AI from the General Manager Digital and Technology to the Head of Digital Products and Platforms.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable Official role reassigned to the Head of Digital Products and Platforms
- Removed: General Manager Digital and Technology as Accountable Official
The words that changed
… improving operational efficiency. ## Monitoring and Governance TheGeneral Manager Digital and TechnologyHead of Digital Products and Platforms, is the designated Accountable Official (AO) for all AI matters. They …The words that changed
… mlctf-reform/new-amlctf-rules) - [Careers](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/work-with-austrac) - [Current vacancies](https://www.austrac.gov.au/ …Transfers the Tribunal's accountable official role from the Chief Information Officer to the Chief Operating Officer and updates the statement date.
read by Claude Opus 5- Accountable official changed from Chief Information Officer to Chief Operating Officer
- Last updated date moved from 26 February 2025 to 24 November 2025
The words that changed
… - The Tribunal’s accountable official under the policy is the ChiefInformOperationg Officer (CIOO). - The CIOO engages with the Senior Management Committee and Principal Registrar … ial engagement via this account will be ignored. Date last updated: 26 February4 November 2025. \_\_Makes AI training mandatory before staff get a licence, firms up reporting of concerns, and confirms it does use AI rather than may.
read by Claude Opus 5- Training on appropriate AI use now required before a licence is granted, not just available
- Staff now obligated (not merely encouraged) to report concerns to the IMT team
- Approval criteria specified as including privacy and security
- "We may utilise AI" changed to "We utilise AI" across corporate/enabling and scientific domains
The words that changed
[Home \_\_](https://aifs.gov.au/) [Policies and complianceCompliance and reporting ](https://aifs.gov.au/main/policiescompliance-reporting) # AI transparency statement#In accordance with the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [_Policy … age presents the Australian Institute of Family Studies’ statement on [AI transparency](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). We see significant potential benefits from using AI to improve the … ______________________________________________________ ## AI use Wemayutilise AI across the _corporate and enabling_ , and _scientific_ domains as stipulated in the _analytics for insights_ and _workplace productivityus, including specific criteria on privacy and security, and approved by our Information Management & Technology (IMT) team prior to usage, and for a. All users of AI are required to review and validate any content generated by the services. ### Training and assistance All staffhave access toare required to undertake training on the appropriate use of AI servicesand are encouragprior to a license being granted, and are obligated to report any concerns to the IMT team. The IMTTteamcanprovide advice and assistance to staff members when needed. ## Compli … protected]. Change history ## Change history Date| Note\ ---|---\ 29 October 2025| Clarified AI training is mandatory for all staff.\ 23 June 2025| Statement review. No changes.\ 2 December 2024| Initial … [ ](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://aifs.gov.au/main/policiescompliance-reporting/ai-transparency-statement&title=AI%20transparency%20statement "Share … tps://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://aifs.gov.au/main/policiescompliance-reporting/ai-transparency-statement "Share to Linkedin")The earlier capture had grabbed AUSTRAC's corporate governance landing page of navigation tiles; this capture picks up the actual AI transparency statement.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
#Corporate information and governance One of our obligations as an Australian Government agency is to provide information about how we operate and perform. We strive to be efficient and accountable in how we fulfil our role as Australia’s financial intelligence unit and anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regulator. The information and documents we provide demonstrate how we achieve this and how you can request more informaAUSTRAC Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ## On this page - Introduction - How we use AI - Usage patterns and domains - Data privacy and security - AI safety and governance - Contact information ## Introduction AUSTRAC performs a dual role as Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regulator and financial intelligence unit. This dual role helps to build resilience in the financial system, and enables AUSTRAC to use financial intelligence and regulation to disrupt money laundering, terrorism financing and other serious crime. As Australia’s AML/CTF regulator, we regulate more than 17,000 businesses that provide financial, gambling, bullion, remittance and digital currency exchange services. We ensure regulated businesses comply with their obligations to have systems and controls in place to manage their risks and protect them and the community from criminal abuse. As a financial intelligence unit, we collect and analyse financial reports and information to generate financial intelligence. This financial intelligence contributes to law enforcement and national security investigations. Our specialist analysts generate targeted, actionable intelligence and work closely with industry, government and law enforcement partners to deliver tangible investigative and operational outcomes. New and emerging technologies are changing the way services are delivered. Criminals are always becoming more sophisticated and developing new ways to exploit vulnerabilities in the Australian financial system. To meet this challenge, we will continue to evolve how we work with industry and our partners, and adopt technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) to support our specialist regulatory and intelligence capabilities. AUSTRAC aims to be transparent about the way we use AI in our agency, and how we intend to approach adoption in the future. Where we have deployed AI, we comply with whole-of-government guidelines to ensure we meet the highest standards of security, privacy, and regulatory compliance. Our current approach and intended future use of AI is to leverage new techniques which advance outcomes while ensuring humans remain a key part of the decision making process. This statement will be reviewed annually and updated when: - we deploy or engage with new AI technologies across our agency - make a significant change to our approach to AI, or - new factors impact this statement. AUSTRAC’s intelligence functions are part of the national intelligence community, as defined under Section 4 of the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) Act 2018 _._ It should be noted that the Responsible Use of AI in Government Policy specifically exempts AUSTRAC’s intelligence functions fromus. [Freedom of informacompliance with requirements of the policy, including this transparency statement. We may voluntarily adopt elements of this policy with respect to our [intelligence functions](https://www.austracdigital.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information "Freedom") [Read more](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/freedom-information)policy/ai/implementation) _,_ where we are able to do so without compromising national security capabilities or interests. ## How we use AI AUSTRAC defers to the DTA’s definition of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system as: A machine-based system that for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions, that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. AUSTRAC uses generative AI tools to undertake research and discovery, and for workplace productivity purposes. This is in alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [ _Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). Privacy controls used in these processes are referred to in the relevant section of this statement. AUSTRAC has not yet deployed any use of AI which directly interacts with the public or is involved in decision making and administrative action without human intervention. This includes automated decision making and automated communication with our stakeholders.[AUSTRACpoliciesis considering the future adoption of AI for the purposes of Workplace Productivity and Analytics for Insights. These usage patterns are currently in the pilot stage where they will be evaluated in alignment with the [ _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government_ and internal AUSTRAC AI Policy.](https://www.austracdigital.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies "AUSTRAC") [Read more](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/austrac-policies) [Corporate plansites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) Upon adoption, AUSTRAC will not use these AI methods without human intervention, monitoring and decision making. AUSTRAC also utilises statistical rules-based modelling and machine learning to: - identify indicators of money laundering, terrorism financing, or financially enabled crime - support our financial intelligence analysts to generate actionable financial intelligence for our partners. These methods do not meet the definition of AI due the rules-based nature of the inputs to these techniques, which are determined by humans. Over the next 2 years, AUSTRAC will implement the AML/CTF Reform priorities and deliver on our data and digital transformation priorities. To support this work, we are actively looking at opportunities to leverage generative AI tools to uplift our regulatory, intelligence and corporate operations. ## Usage patterns and domains The [ _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government_](https://www.austracdigital.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/corpsites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) requires AUSTRAC to state the usage pattern(s) and domain(s) associated with our use of AI. For more informate-plan "Corpion, refer to the Digital Transformate") [Read more](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/corporate-plan) [Annualion Agency (DTA) [ _classification system for AI use_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). AUSTRAC’s current AI usage patterns are: - **Workplace Productivity:** Used to support non-sensitive research through the collation of publicly available information. AUSTRAC’s current AI domains are: - **Corporate and Enabling:** Supports corporate functions to improve operational efficiency and productivity. AUSTRAC is currently developing and piloting uses of AI which will in the future: - **Expand usage patterns** to include: - **Analytics for Insights** to identify, produce and understand insights within structured or unstructured materials - **Workplace Productivity** to include virtual assistants. - **Expand domains** to include: - **Service Delivery** to provide tailored and resports](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-nsive services directly to external and internal stakeholders, through supporting staff who deliver these services. - **Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Security** to support law enforcement and intelligence agencies through AI-enabled analysis of data from various sources which aid intelligence gathering. ## Data privacy and security Protecting the privacy and security of sensitive and classified information-and-governance/annual-reports "Annual") [Read more](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-the data of individuals is of paramount importance to us. We ensure that data is handled in compliance with the applicable legislations and regulations; Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), the _Protective Security Policy Framework_ and other relevant data protection laws. Personal information is only collected, used, and shared where necessary in line with our privacy policies. In accordance with internal guidelines and policies, staff who use publicly available generative AI tools for research purposes will not include or reveal any classified, personal or otherwise sensitive information. All activities will align with legislation and policies relating to information and data. ## AI safety and-governance/annual-reports) [Reports and accountability](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability "Reports") [Read more](https://www.austrac.gov.au/about-us/corporate-information-and-governance/reports-and-accountability)AUSTRAC’s AI Accountable Official is the General Manager, Data (Chief Data and Analytics Officer). AUSTRAC is committed to implementing AI systems to align with evolving legislation, ethical standards, and public expectations. As we deploy AI into our regulatory, intelligence and corporate operational capabilities, we will follow whole-of-government guidelines to ensure any use of AI is guided by the following key principles: - **Enable** : AUSTRAC will engage with AI in safe, ethical and responsible ways, including establishing clear accountabilities for AI adoption, use and explainability. - **Engage responsibly** : AUSTRAC will ensure AI use is ethical, responsible, transparent and explainable, and that proportionate and targeted risk mitigations are applied for AI use cases. - **Evolve** : AUSTRAC will apply flexibility and adaptability to AI uses to accommodate technological advances, including ongoing review and evaluation of existing AI use cases and exploration of new approaches. To further support these efforts, AUSTRAC has established governance practices, policies and guidance to ensure the ethical, transparent, and secure implementation and use of AI. This includes: - AUSTRAC’s AI Policy and guidance to staff relating to use of information technology systems and AI, inclusive of public generative AI tools. - Availability of AI training for all staff to enable appropriate use of AI systems. As the use of AI within AUSTRAC expands, consideration will be given to additional governance processes and practices which will ensure the appropriate, ethical, and safe use of AI. ## Contact information We will regularly review and update our AI policies and practices as part of our ongoing commitment to the responsible use of AI. This includes staying informed about new developments in AI technology, ethics, and regulatory requirements. We will strive to improve the transparency, fairness, and effectiveness of our use of AI systems through continuous learning and adaptation. This statement was last updated on 28 February 2025 and will be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when new factors impact this statement. If you have questions or would like more information about how AUSTRAC uses AI, [contact us](https://www.austrac.gov.au/contact-us/form). This guidance sets out how we interpret the Act, along with associat … o account when determining how the law applies to you. Last updated:13 Dec27 Feb 20245 Page ID:8801173 ## Was this page helpful? Was this page helpful? Was this page hel …Capture switches from the AEC's general "AI & elections" webpage to its actual transparency statement PDF, disclosing tools, governance, an accountable official and contact.
read by Claude Opus 5- Names accountable official: First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation Group
- Commitment not to use AI in any AEC interaction with the public
- Names tools: GitHub Copilot, limited Microsoft 365 Copilot trial, speech-to-text and image generation for design staff
- Discloses domain (corporate and enabling) and usage pattern (workplace productivity)
The words that changed
# AI & elections AI & elections - [Home](https://www.aec.gov.au/) - > [Elections](https://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/) - > [AI & elections](https://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/electoral-advertising/ai-and-elections.htm) Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to develop various forms of communication. The use of AI has societal benefits, including for elections, but it also has some obvious potential negative impacts. Some recent community concern being expressed includes the impact on people’s ability to determine whether what they’re seeing or hearing is real in election campaign communication. This means that voters need to be made aware of the potential impacts of AI on elections and provided with information and tools to help them more deeply examine the information they see, hear and read. ## AI for good It is easy to overlook the potential benefits of AI in the electoral environment, but these are starting to emerge in recent elections around the globe. This includes the potential to enhance voter inclusion through easier translation of educative material into other languages. There has also been commentary from campaigners with fewer resources that it can provide a greater opportunity to more widely and easily communicate with voters. The efficiencies and benefits of AI are still to be realised and will continue to evolve with the technology. ### The AEC's use of AI Australian elections are predominantly a manual process. The AEC's use of AI is, at this stage, very limited. It includes one limited use trial in an aspect of software development and the availability of Microsoft 365 CoPilot to staff. As per the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, the AEC has published a statement on the [AEC's use of AI](https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Publications/files/AEC-AI-Transparency-Statement.pdf) ## AI communication channels AI can be used to generate content for just about any communication channel – this includes written, verbal or visual mediums. ### Chatbots A chatbot is a tool that uses AI technology to answer questions or hold a conversation with a user. The technology that powers chatbots can be complex, but on a very basic level they are similar to the autocomplete function on a mobile phone. Chat bots can be a helpful tool in everyday life for a range of information and services. They can offer availability that otherwise wouldn’t be there as well as timeliness and other benefits. While chatbots can use natural-sounding language (some even allow voice chat), it’s important to remember that they are not alive, and do not think or feel. While often helpful, chatbots have a documented history of ‘hallucinating’ information, which can lead to them providing incorrect information. Due to the risk of chatbots hallucinating information about Australia’s electoral system, the AEC has reviewed major chatbot results relating to federal election processes. In addition, the AEC is engaging with relevant companies in an effort to have chatbot results direct users to the AEC’s website for information. ### Robocalls A robocall, sometimes called a bulk phone call, is a campaign in which voters receive a phone call featuring a pre-recorded political message. Robocalls are not a new feature of Australian elections. However, the introduction of AI technology means that robocalls are now easier and cheaper to produce. AI technology can be used to produce audio that sounds similar to real human voice. AI technology can also be used to ‘copy’ somebody’s voice – this is called a deepfake. The AEC does not provide voter phone numbers to political campaigners and has no information about how phone numbers are obtained for either robocalls or bulk text message campaigns. Regardless of whether an electoral robocall uses a human voice or is produced using AI technology, it must include an authorisation message at the beginning of the call. This authorisation message usually needs to contain the name of the person or entity who approved the communication, as well as their address. ### Deepfake videos Deepfake video is a video that depicts somebody doing or saying something that they did not do or say. Deepfake video is often paired with deepfake audio, with the fake video adjusting the movement of an individual’s head and mouth to match the deepfake audio being used. Some deepfakes might be obvious – many are not actually trying to deceive people but rather making a point and some are even designed as an obvious satire. Other deepfakes can be more subtle and could be designed to mislead voters into thinking that a person did or said something that never happened. While the technology for deepfakes has been around for a few years, recent advances in AI technology have made it a lot easier for individuals to create them. The use of the technology is not banned in election campaigning. However, like any electoral communication, the legality of creating and distributing a deepfake depends on the content. Political parties or campaigners may opt to voluntarily disclose when an AI tool has been used to manipulate a video by including a simple message in the video. The Electoral Act requires electoral communication like videos and audio recordings to be authorised by the individual or entity communicating. If these authorisation messages aren’t present, the AEC can investigate and take further action. ### Manipulated or generated images A manipulated image is an image that is intended to look realistic, but which has been modified in some way to mislead viewers. While recent advancements in AI technology have made it easier to manipulate images, manipulated (or ‘Photoshopped’) images have been a feature of public debate for several years. There is no requirement for political parties or campaigners to disclose that they are using a manipulated image, or that an image was manipulated using an AI tool. Political parties or campaigners may opt to disclose when an AI tool has been used to manipulate an image, by including a simple message in the image. If an image (regardless of whether it was manipulated or not) is published to a social media account or a website for the purpose of campaigning for the federal election, that social media account or website must feature an authorisation message. ### Falsified audio Falsified, or deepfake, audio is an audio recording that depicts somebody saying something that they did not say. Some deepfakes might be obvious – many are not actually trying to deceive people but rather making a point and some are even designed as an obvious satire. Other deepfakes can be more subtle and could be designed to mislead voters into thinking that a person said something that never happened. While the technology for deepfakes has been around for a few years, recent advances in AI technology have made it a lot easier for individuals to create them. There are a number of ways that falsified audio can be used to campaign for an election including for translated messages or robocalls. As with other forms of electoral communication, depending on the message and format audio about a federal election will require an authorisation statement so people know the source of the message. Political parties or campaigners may opt to disclose when an AI tool has been used to manipulate audio, by including a simple message in the audio. ## Emerging impact The use of AI in election communication is an emerging and dynamic space. More than 60 of the world’s countries conducted their national election in 2024 (around half of the world’s democratic nations). There’s been examples in some elections recently of false videos pretending to deliver messages from candidates and robocalls misleading voters about how to participate in elections. The impact is hard to quantify but there hasn’t been any evidence to date that the use of AI in election communication has been the determining factor in election results. During a federal election in Australia, it is reasonable to expect that there could be AI used in election communication – in a way that is not a cause for concern as well as material that could endeavour to mislead voters about either the voting process or candidates in the election. Recent research, external to the AEC, that is dedicated to this topic includes the following: - [Parliament of Australia](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Adopting_Artificial_Intelligence_AI/AdoptingAI/Interim_report/Chapter_2_-_Impacts_of_AI_on_democracy) - Impacts of AI on democracy - [International IDEA: Exploring the opportunities and risks of AI](https://www.idea.int/events/ai-elections-exploring-opportunities-and-risks-artificial-intelligence) - [UN: Can artificial intelligence influence elections?](https://unric.org/en/can-artificial-intelligence-ai-influence-elections/) - Brennan Centre for Justice: [The Effect of AI on Elections Around the World and What to Do About It](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/effect-ai-elections-around-world-and-what-do-about-it) - [The Alan Turing Institute: ](https://www.turing.ac.uk/) - [What has the ‘year of elections’ taught us about AI and democracy?](https://www.turing.ac.uk/blog/what-has-year-elections-taught-us-about-ai-and-democracy) - [No evidence that AI disinformation or deepfakes impacted UK, French or European elections results](https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/no-evidence-ai-disinformation-or-deepfakes-impacted-uk-french-or-european-elections-results) \_\_ - [Beyond the deepfake: five Turing experts look at how AI is impacting democracy](https://www.turing.ac.uk/blog/beyond-deepfake-five-turing-experts-look-how-ai-impacting-democracy) ## Regulation & safeguards There are many individuals, organisations and institutions that contribute to the communication environment around elections, either directly or indirectly. \_\_ ### Tech organisations Many organisations assess their responsibilities and implement initiatives to combat the potential negative impacts of technologies like AI. In 2024, many of the world’s leading technology organisations were signatories to the [Tech Accord to Combat Deceptive Use of AI in Elections](https://securityconference.org/en/aielectionsaccord/). The accord represents a set of commitments to deploy tools and technology countering harmful AI-generated content meant to deceive voters. The AEC continues to work with these tech companies regarding progress on their agreed obligations with respect to deepfakes. The [Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)](https://c2pa.org/) is a related joint development between several of the world’s leading technology and AI companies with the aim of developing technical standards for the source and history of media content. - [Microsoft: Check. re-check. vote.](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Corporate-Responsibility/Elections?msockid=362be73d8fc66e860ff9f22c8e2c6f6d) \_\_ ### Current legislation There is no prohibition of the use of AI in election campaigning under the _Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918_. However, electoral laws do require certain campaign communication to feature an [authorisation statement](https://www.aec.gov.au/about_aec/authorisation.htm), so people know the source of the communication. More information is available from our Authorisations Better Practice Guide. - [Authorisations: AEC Better Practice Guide](https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/files/better-practice-guide.pdf) There is also a criminal offence in the Electoral Act for misleading or deceiving an elector in relation to casting a vote. This section of the act has been tightly interpreted by the courts to be about information that could impact how a voter completes their ballot paper, and the voting instructions, during the election period. If AI generated communication misled voters in this way the creator and communicator could be subject to criminal charges. \_\_ ### Parliamentary consideration Parliament has been considering the issue of AI in communication through the Senate Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence. The [AEC appeared](https://www.aec.gov.au/media/files/Opening-Statement-20-May-2024-Senate-Selec-Committee-on-Adopting-AI.pdf) before this committee in May 2024 and provided [a submission](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Adopting_Artificial_Intelligence_AI/AdoptingAI/Submissions). Discussions with the AEC centred on the potential impact of certain uses of AI, as well as matters like the potential value of broader, whole-of-government, digital literacy campaigns or requiring the labelling of AI generated content. Whether or not regulation around the use of AI in election campaign material is introduced in the future is a matter for Parliament. \_\_ ### Education and communication Each election, the AEC runs a digital literacy campaign called ‘Stop and Consider’. This campaign encourages people to “get tips” on how they consume information, linking them back to [educational resources on the AEC website](https://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/electoral-advertising/stopandconsider.htm). The campaign has been expanded for the 2025 federal election and addresses new topics such as AI. The AEC also maintains a prominent social and mainstream media presence, as well as other online educational material that includes a [voter’s guide to election campaigning](https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/voters-guide-to-political-campaigning.htm) and a [register of disinformation about election processes](https://www.aec.gov.au/media/disinformation-register.htm). These tools are provided by the AEC to assist voters in thinking critically when consuming campaign material. In addition, the AEC is developing a suite of digital literacy learning resources for use by community organisations and others. Outside of the AEC, there is also a range of educative content available from organisations and others in the community about AI and deepfakes specifically. \_\_ ### Reporting avenues Some tech organisations and platforms have their own AI detection and content verification tools. There are also a range of online reporting avenues. Links to these tools are available in the industry resources section of the [AEC’s voter’s guide to election campaigning](https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/election-campaigning.htm). ## AEC environmental assessment (January 2025) This webpage provides a range of contextual information on the topic of AI in elections that is designed to assist voters and other stakeholders in their own thinking. As outlined on this page, the AEC notes that for the 2025 federal election deepfakes in political communication are not illegal and, in many cases, are likely not to be used in an unethical manner. However, the general purpose of some deepfakes can be to deceive the person consuming the message - the emerging medium that is AI makes that potential deception of voters a greater concern than it has been in the past when there were fewer, and less sophisticated, tools at the disposal of communicators. Deepfake political communication that meets the definition of electoral matter (paid content or from a political participant) has some protection in the form of authorisation requirements. Voters are at least provided with the critical information that is the source of the message. This gives the voter the opportunity to assess the context in which the information is being provided, as they form their view about the purpose and potential accuracy of it. Of course, not all political communication requires an authorisation, but the law does cover most forms of communication likely to be a prominent part of the election environment. Voters should exercise a healthy degree of scepticism and caution if they see or hear political communication where: - the source is unknown or can’t be identified, - the information is trying to invoke an emotional response, - it sounds or looks unusual, - it can’t be easily verified through other sources, - it sounds and looks too good to be true, - the pictures or video look constructed, altered or artificial, it depicts someone doing something that is unusual, out of the norm, or out of character, - it does not contain any labels or warnings, - there is broad media reporting raising doubts about the accuracy and or legitimacy of the information or its source, - the method of dissemination can’t be trusted or easily verified. The AEC’s Stop and Consider campaign, and supporting digital literacy material, has been increased significantly for the 2025 federal election. As citizens continue to mature their own consumption habits in line with modern communication methods, it is important they’re assisted by authorities and communicators alike to perform that important individual task. **Updated:** 25 September 2025 ## On this page - AI for good - AI communication channels - Emerging impact - Regulation & safeguards - AEC environmental assessment (January 2025) Back to topClassification: OFFICIAL Australian Electoral Commission Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement\ Background The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) notes the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (the Policy) requires that relevant agencies, including the AEC, release a transparency statement providing information about their use of AI.\ Consistent with the Policy, the AEC has provided the Digital Transformation Agency a link to this statement on the AEC website.\ The Policy also requires the AEC to nominate an accountable official for the implementation of the Policy. The AEC’s accountable official is the First Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Transformation Group. The AEC’s use of AI We have an internal policy on the use of AI by staff, which staff are required to follow when using AEC approved AI tools. This policy encourages and assists staff to:\ • not rely on the authenticity or veracity of content generated by AI, without human review • understand safe and responsible use of AI in accordance with Australia's AI ethics framework • not use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public. The AEC also has an AI assurance assessment process in place to assess potential AI tools for use based on the Pilot Australian Government AI assurance framework. The AEC’s use of AI includes: • GitHub Copilot - GitHub Copilot is a generative AI tool for technical staff, designed to improve productivity and efficiency of software application development. • Microsoft Copilot - The AEC is conducting a limited trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot (licensed version) for staff using their AEC corporate accounts to evaluate its potential for supporting corporate tasks and individual productivity tasks. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, AEC staff are required to complete internal training on the use of generative AI. • Other – Some AEC staff have access to assistive and adaptive technologies such as\ speech-to-text software along with a limited number of staff in our graphical design area who use AI to generate educational images. The AEC uses AI in the following domain and usage pattern: • Domain: Corporate and enabling. The AEC’s current use relates to supporting corporate functions and improving operational efficiency. • Usage pattern: Workplace productivity. The AEC’s current use is for workplace productivity purposes. This includes summarising and analysing data and information, automating or reducing time spent on administrative tasks and supporting software application development. More information about usage patterns and domains is available at Classification system for AI use | digital.gov.au OFFICIAL Identifying and protecting against risks to electoral integrity The AEC acknowledges the transformative potential of AI for society and government, including operational efficiencies and enhanced data analysis. The 2024 Australian Government trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot showed productivity improvements but also highlighted barriers, concerns, and risks associated with AI in government. Public trust in the AEC is crucial for maintaining confidence in electoral processes and results, which is essential for defending Australia's democracy. In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, meeting community and stakeholder expectations is increasingly complex. To maintain public confidence, the AEC emphasises the importance of transparency in how AI is used in its operations, security, and information systems as detailed above in "The AEC’s use of AI”. Third-party suppliers The AEC has processes in place to manage the potential use of AI by third-party suppliers. Agreements with third party providers contain confidentiality requirements that the provider is contractually required to adhere to. Where applicable, the AEC additionally requires all relevant provider personnel are Australian citizens and may require that personnel possess Australian Government security clearances at a level the AEC deems appropriate per-role.\ For applicable agreements (i.e. managed service arrangements), the AEC contractually requires that AEC data remains onshore in Australia.\ In cases where the provider is delivering an IT capability that processes AEC data, such solutions are subject to the AEC’s review and approval through its governance processes. Any potential utilisation of AI as part of such solutions would be identified as part of this process, including with respect to potential data sovereignty issues. Governance and legislation Governance Structure Senior Executive Committee (SEC): • overarching monitoring of performance, accountability, risk, and agency direction • chaired by the Australian Electoral Commissioner • approves which AI tools can be used at the AEC in conjunction with the Investment Committee. Investment Committee: • security and risk considerations relating to AI use • strategic transformation and investment considerations relating to AI use. Advisory Audit Committee: • established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act). Compliance with Legislation and Regulation • Privacy Act 1988: Regulates the collection, storage, and use of personal information by AI • Archives Act 1983: Governs records created by AI OFFICIAL • Freedom of Information Act 1982: Provides public access to documents created by AI. Oversight and Audits • Compliance overseen by the SEC. • Internal audits are conducted to detect non-compliance. • The Regulatory Action Plan guides the AEC's approach to regulatory compliance, including application of the new AI Policy. Updates to this statement Consistent with the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, this statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the AEC’s approach to AI changes or evolves. This statement was updated on 25 September 2025 and is authorised by AEC’s AI Accountable Officer. Contact Enquires may be directed to media@aec.gov.auOnly the contact email's Cloudflare obfuscation link rendering differs; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… For enquiries about Screen Australia’s adoption of AI, please contact[[email protected]](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4625292b2b33282f2527322f292835063525342323282733353234272a2f2768212930682733)## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, …No change of substance: an obfuscated email link renders as plain text and a share-by-email widget drops out of the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… or further information on the Institute’s usage of AI, please contact[[email protected]](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#22434b62434b44510c454d540c4357). Change history ## Change history Date| Note\ ---|---\ 23 June 202 … fs.gov.au/main/policies/ai-transparency-statement "Share to Linkedin")[ ](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f703c3a2d252a2c3b720e066a7d7f3b3d2e213c3f2e3d2a212c366a7d7f3c3b2e3b2a222a213b692d202b3672273b3b3f3c7560602e26293c61282039612e3a60222e2621603f2023262c262a3c602e26623b3d2e213c3f2e3d2a212c36623c3b2e3b2a222a213b "Share to E-mail")The previous capture had failed, grabbing only a banner image; this capture restores the full ML and AI principles page unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
 https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-06/Aus%20Music%20still_Molly_Mega%20Menu.png24/06/2024  https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-08/ML%20AND%20AI%20Banner.jpg # NFSA Principles for ML and AI _As part of ongoing policy development, NFSA teams collaborated on establishing clear principles regarding the use of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in our daily practice._ ## NFSA Principles for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Creation and Use At the National Film and Sound Archive of Australia, the creation and use of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies are guided by three key strategies: **building effectively and transparently** , **maintaining trust** and **creating\*\*\*\*public value**. From the 1930s to the present, the NFSA and its predecessor institutions have worked on and with emerging media technologies. From nitrate film to digital cinema production and streaming; from wax cylinders, shellac discs and wire audio recordings to LPs, CDs and podcasts; or from video games encoded on cassette tape to hand-held consoles and now VR – the technical evolution of audiovisual media creation, consumption and preservation is at the core of our work. The _National Film and Sound Archive of Australia Act 2008_ requires us to develop, preserve, maintain and share the collection with all Australians – our core responsibility as a trusted custodian of Australia’s audiovisual heritage cannot be understated. As machine learning technologies and generative artificial intelligence systems proliferate within the screen and audio production ecosystems, we have taken an informed and critical approach to these technologies. We seek to develop technologies that help people find, understand and manage the NFSA’s collections to assist us in fulfilling our statutory responsibilities. AI has the potential to unlock our vast collection of digitised and born-digital audiovisual material and help transform the NFSA. By increasing the discoverability and accessibility of the collection, AI can significantly improve the efficiency, accuracy and impact of our archival work. However, as an emerging technology and field of practice, AI also presents new risks and challenges that we must proactively manage. The challenge to responsibly deploying these technologies within a cultural archive is threefold: technical, cultural and legal. The following strategies frame our response to these challenges. ### MAINTAIN TRUST We maintain the trust of the public, creators, collection contributors and NFSA staff by ensuring AI projects work within our collecting policies while paying particular care with First Nations collections and seeking consent from stakeholders and copyright owners where required. We work within the relevant Australian laws, monitor anticipated changes in laws and regulations and actively contribute to the evolution of the legal and copyright environments in which we work. We declare the use of AI and AI-enabled services and contribute to AI literacy and responsible development at the NFSA and beyond. ### BUILD EFFECTIVELY AND TRANSPARENTLY We build and train machine learning systems ourselves so that they can understand Australian content and context. Where appropriate, we mix commercially available products with products built in-house, working experimentally and iteratively. We evaluate systems according to technical quality, cost and fitness, cultural safety and accuracy. We work transparently within the NFSA and collaboratively with external peers and partners, sharing what we learn. ### CREATE PUBLIC VALUE Our use of ML and AI improves the discoverability and usability of our collections for everyone while developing AI systems that 'understand Australian' so they can engage directly with our culture. We invest in creating localised ML models for transcription and discovery to use and share with peers in an Australian context. These principles will evolve as we learn through an iterative process, just as ML and AI technologies and uses evolve. We welcome feedback to ensure we continue to responsibly and thoughtfully use AI and ML technologies as we strive to share Australia’s national audiovisual collection.  https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/uploads/2011/02/02/film_footage_3.jpg We are on the side of creators. NFSA's usage of machine learning and AI is guided by these principles. ## Further reading The NFSA is a statutory authority established by the [_National Film and Sound Archive Act 2008_ (Cth)](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2008A00014/latest/versions), and the development and use of AI and ML technologies is guided by the NFSA Act in the ‘endeavour to make the most advantageous use of the national collection in the national interest’ [s6(3)(b)] and to ‘promote the efficient, effective and ethical use of public resources’ [s6(3)(d)]. Visit the [Governance section of our website](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/corporate-information/governance) for more information. In our development and use of AI and ML technologies, we are also informed by the Australian Government’s [Artificial Intelligence Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and the [National framework for the assurance of artificial intelligence in government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). Some NFSA staff use the Wasabi AiR media management platform for machine learning-supported content discovery tasks, and some use machine learning-enabled copy-proofing software for marketing and corporate communications. The NFSA is developing a set of custom transcription, summary, entity recognition and content discovery tools in-house that are specifically suited to NFSA collection content and internal workflows. In October 2024, the NFSA hosted [Fantastic Futures](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/ff24), the annual gathering for the international AI4LAM (AI for Libraries, Archives and Museums) community. This event drew leading technologists, academics and cultural workers together to engage, share ideas and showcase their work. Video recordings of conference sessions are available on-demand, for free, on the [Fantastic Futures](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/fantastic-futures-conference-canberra-2024) section of the [NFSA’s Research and Innovation hub](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/research). ## Download the statement [**NFSA Principles for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Creation and Use**](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-08/NFSA%20Principles%20for%20ML%20and%20AI%20-%20April%202024.pdf) (PDF) [research](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/research) [artificial intelligence](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/artificial-intelligence) ## More to explore [  https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-07/Sustainability_hub-hero_1600x1000.jpg ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sustainability-nfsa) ### [Sustainability at the NFSA ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sustainability-nfsa) The NFSA's approach to sustainability is guided by the First Nations principle of custodianship of Country. [  https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-06/NFSA-player_Mabo_1062165.jpg ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/latest/nangamai-dream-first-nations-stories-online) ### [Nangamai (Dream): First Nations stories online ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/latest/nangamai-dream-first-nations-stories-online) The NFSA is proud to present Nangamai ('Dream' in Dharawal language), a collection of online First Nations content. [First Nations artists](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/first-nations-artists) [First Nations filmmakers](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/first-nations-filmmakers) [Eddie Mabo](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/eddie-mabo) [Archie Roach](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/archie-roach) [Ruby Hunter](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/ruby-hunter) [Deborah Mailman](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/deborah-mailman) [David Gulpilil](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/david-gulpilil) [Treaty](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/treaty) [From Little Things Big Things Grow](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/little-things-big-things-grow) [Spear](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/spear) [Ella Havelka](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/ella-havelka) [Carriberrie](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/carriberrie) [NAIDOC Week](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/naidoc-week) [Nangamai](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/nangamai) [  https://www.nfsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/16mm%20film%20canisters%20vaults%20shelving%20preservation.jpg ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/latest/nathan-sentance-racism-archival-collections) ### [Nathan Sentance on Racism in Archival Collections ](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/latest/nathan-sentance-racism-archival-collections) Guest First Nations writer Nathan Sentance offers suggestions about how historical collecting institutions can provide access to racist collection material without causing harm. [racism](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/racism) [archiving](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/archiving) [First Nations peoples](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/first-nations-peoples) [collections](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/collections) [guest contributor](https://www.nfsa.gov.au/tags/guest-contributor)The previous capture was a blocked fetch error page; this capture simply restores the existing statement text unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Request unsuccessful. Incapsula incident ID: 808000440051946560-100687768776608524[ Listen ](https://app-oc.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=7448&lang=en_au&readid=block-pearly-content&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pmc.gov.au%2Fabout-us%2Faccountability-and-reporting%2Fcorporate-reporting%2Fartificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. In adopting AI technologies, PM&C is committed to upholding the highest **transparency, risk management, and governance** standards to ensure responsible and ethical use. ## Our approach to AI transparency - **Accountability and Oversight** —PM&C's AI systems are subject to robust governance frameworks, ensuring alignment with legal, ethical, and policy obligations. - **Explainability and Fairness** —We use AI models that are interpretable, fair, and free from bias, with clear explanations available for decisions made using AI. - **Privacy and Security** —Protecting personal data is paramount. AI applications comply with strict privacy and cybersecurity standards to safeguard sensitive information. - **Human Oversight and Decision-Making** —AI assists, not replaces, human judgment. Critical decisions remain under human supervision, with mechanisms in place for review. - **Continuous Monitoring and Improvement** —AI systems are assessed for performance, fairness and transparency. PM&C adheres to [ _Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles) _,_ demonstrating our commitment to protecting privacy and security and to the Digital Information Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) AI must be used in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) In addition to Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, PM&C has adopted the following 6 AI principles: 1. Only AI tools that are authorised for access and use within PM&C are to be deployed. 1. Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. 1. AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. 1. AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services. 1. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Employment Principals and Code of Conduct. 1. PM&C will not use AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. PM&C provides guidance to staff, including training in AI government fundamentals, to help understand the compliance and governance arrangements and the requirement to adhere to both internal and external policies. PM&C is dedicated to fostering public trust by ensuring AI-driven processes remain **ethical, responsible, and aligned with the interests of the Australian Government** while still being able to harness AI technologies. This statement will be reviewed annually, when PM&C makes significant changes to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statement. For further information on PM&C’s AI governance and transparency please contact [Help-ITServiceDesk@pmc.gov.au](mailto:Help-ITServiceDesk@pmc.gov.au). Authorised by Justin Keefe\ First Assistant Secretary\ Digital Security and Workplace Operations Division\ Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 28 February 2025Only the Cloudflare email-obfuscation code in the contact link changed; the statement's text and contact details are unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ected]](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5f5351514952555f5d485553524f7c4f5f4e5959525d494f484e5d50555d125b534a125d494625292b2b33282f2527322f292835063525342323282733353234272a2f2768212930682733) ## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, …Only the Cloudflare email-obfuscation codes in the contact and share links changed; the statement's text is unaltered.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ct [[email protected]](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c3cbe2c3cbc4d18cc5cdd48cc3d22434b62434b44510c454d540c4357). Change history ## Change history Date| Note\ ---|---\ 23 June 2 … are to Linkedin") [ ](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#231c505641494640571e626a0611135751424d50534251464d405a06111350574257464e464d5705414c475a1e4b57575350190c0c424a45500d444c550d42560c4e424a4d0c534c4f4a404a46500c424a0e5751424d50534251464d405a0e50574257464e464d574f703c3a2d252a2c3b720e066a7d7f3b3d2e213c3f2e3d2a212c366a7d7f3c3b2e3b2a222a213b692d202b3672273b3b3f3c7560602e26293c61282039612e3a60222e2621603f2023262c262a3c602e26623b3d2e213c3f2e3d2a212c36623c3b2e3b2a222a213b "Share to E-mail")Only breadcrumb navigation and a sidebar link list dropped from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Breadcrumb 1. [  ](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/) 1.  [About us](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us) 1.  [Reporting and accountabil...](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability) 1.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement ##### Reporting and accountability \_\_ - [Annual report](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/annual-report) - [Corporate plan](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/corporate-plan) - [Freedom of information and disclosure log](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/freedom-information-and-disclosure-log) - [Gifts and benefits](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/gifts-and-benefits) - [Privacy](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/privacy) - [Financial reporting](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/financial-reporting) - [Information publication scheme agency plan](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [Public interest disclosures](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/public-interest-disclosures) -  [AI transparency statement](https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/ai-transparency-statement)# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement TEQSA acknowled …No change of substance: navigation menus dropped from the capture and the Cloudflare-obfuscated contact email link re-encoded.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
1. [Screen Australia](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/ "Screen Australia") 1. [About us](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us "About us") 1. [Corporate documents](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents "Corporate documents") 1. [Our Approach to AI](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-1 "Our Approach to AI") 1. AI Transparency Statement - [About us](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us) - [Who we are](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are "Who we are") - [What we do](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do "What we do") - [Corporate documents](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents "Corporate documents") - [Annual reports](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/annual-reports "Annual reports") - [Corporate plan](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/corporate-plan "Corporate plan") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/rap "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Our Approach to AI](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-1 "Our Approach to AI") - [AI Transparency Statement](<https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-transparency-statement> "AI Transparency Statement") - [AI Guiding Principles](<https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/policies-(1)/ai-guiding-principles> "AI Guiding Principles") - [Disclosures](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/disclosures "Disclosures") - [Policies](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/policies "Policies") - [Files created](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/files-created "Files created") - [Statement of Expectations](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/about-us/corporate-documents/statement-of-expectations "Statement of Expectations") - [Doing business with us](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/doing-business-with-us "Doing business with us") - [Jobs with Screen Australia](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/jobs-with-screen-australia "Jobs with Screen Australia") - [Subscribe to the newsletter](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/subscribe "Subscribe to the newsletter") - [Contact us](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/about-us/contact-us "Contact us")# **AI Transparency Statement** Screen Australia is committed to safe … ected]](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#791a1614140c17101a180d1016170a390a1a0b1c1c17180c0a0d0b18151018571e160f57180c3c5f5351514952555f5d485553524f7c4f5f4e5959525d494f484e5d50555d125b534a125d49) ## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, …Only the page's breadcrumb navigation dropped out of the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.psr.gov.au/) 1. [Publications and resources](https://www.psr.gov.au/publications-and-resources) 1. [Publications](https://www.psr.gov.au/publications-and-resources/publications) 1. [Corporate documents](https://www.psr.gov.au/publications-and-resources/publications/corporate-documents) 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement Published date …Only a breadcrumb navigation trail dropped from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
1. [Home](https://www.pc.gov.au/) \_\_ 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement Released 24 / 0 …- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsmanfirst tracked
The words that changed
[](https://www.oaic.gov.au) - [About the OAIC](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC) - [Our corporate information](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information) - [OAIC AI transparency statement](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC/our-corporate-information/oaic-ai-transparency-statement)[ About the OAIC ](https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-the-OAIC) #### [ Our …Only breadcrumb navigation and an "On this page" label dropped from the capture; the statement itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/)- [ Home ](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) \_\_ - Current: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement On this page[ Listen ](https://app-as.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=744 …Only the page's breadcrumb navigation dropped out of the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… 20-03/accountability-reporting-banner-std-7534887.jpg?itok=slC9n1a1)## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.naa.gov.au/) 1. [About us](https://www.naa.gov.au/about-us) 1. [Who we are ](https://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are) 1. [Accountability and reporting](https://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/accountability-and-reporting) 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement The Digital Tra …Only the breadcrumb navigation links dropped out of the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
1. [Home](https://www2.gbrmpa.gov.au/) 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement## AI transparency statement In accordance with the Digital Transform …Only the site's navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the transparency statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## [About us](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us) - [Contact us](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us) Toggle submenu - [Self-help tools](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/self-help-tools) - [If you still need help](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help) Toggle submenu - [Contact a Commission Member](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/contact-commission-member) - [Request a document or case file](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/request-document-or-case-file) - [Office locations](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations) Toggle submenu - [Australian Capital Territory office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/australian-capital-territory-office) - [New South Wales offices](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/new-south-wales-offices) - [Northern Territory office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/northern-territory-office) - [Queensland office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/queensland-office) - [South Australia office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/south-australia-office) - [Tasmania office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/tasmania-office) - [Victoria office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/victoria-office) - [Western Australia office](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/office-locations/western-australia-office) - [Help in your language](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/help-your-language) - [Question? Ask us online](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/question-ask-us-online) - [Feedback and complaints](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/if-you-still-need-help/feedback-and-complaints) Toggle submenu - [Complain about Commission staff or processes](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/feedback-and-complaints/complain-about-commission-staff-or-processes) - [Complain about a lawyer or paid agent](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/feedback-and-complaints/complain-about-lawyer-or-paid-agent) - [Complain about a Member of the Commission](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/feedback-and-complaints/complain-about-member-commission) Toggle submenu - [Procedure for dealing with complaints about Members](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/feedback-and-complaints/complain-about-member-commission/procedure-dealing) - [News and media](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media) Toggle submenu - [News](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media/news) - [Media releases](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media/media-releases) - [Media enquiries and access](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media/media-enquiries-and-access) - [New laws](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws) Toggle submenu - [Regulated workers and businesses hub](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/regulated-workers-and-businesses-hub-0) - [Regulated Worker User Group](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/regulated-worker-user-group) - [The Road Transport Advisory Group](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/road-transport-advisory-group) Toggle submenu - [RTAG subcommittee participants](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/road-transport-advisory-group/rtag-subcommittee-participants) - [The Closing Loopholes Acts – what’s changing](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/closing-loopholes-acts-whats-changing) - [Secure Jobs Better Pay Act – what’s changing](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing) Toggle submenu - [Making of the Statement of Principles](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/making-statement-principles-genuine-agreement) - [Bargaining support from 6 June 2023](https://www.fwc.gov.au/secure-jobs-better-pay/bargaining-support-6-june-23) Toggle submenu - [New cooperative workplace agreements](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/new-cwa) - [New single interest employer agreements](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/new-single) - [Adding employers and their employees to a single interest employer agreement](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/varying-single) - [New supported bargaining agreements](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/new-supported) - [Adding employers and their employees to a supported bargaining agreement](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/varying-supported) - [Removing an employer and employees from multi-enterprise agreements from 6 June 2023](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/varying-multi) - [Changes to protected action ballot order applications](https://www.fwc.gov.au/secure-jobs-better-pay/bargaining-support-6-june-23/protected-action-ballot-order-applications) - [Changes to bargaining declarations and determinations: intractable bargaining](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/new-laws/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/bargaining-support-6-june-2023/changes) - [Share our information about bargaining changes](https://www.fwc.gov.au/secure-jobs-better-pay/bargaining-support-6-june-23/share-information) - [Support for enterprise agreement making](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secure-jobs-better-pay-act-whats-changing/support-enterprise-agreement-making) - [Online Learning Portal](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/online-learning-portal) - [Information in your language](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language) Toggle submenu - [عربي (Arabic)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/arabic) - [မြန်မာ (Burmese)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/burmese) - [粵語 (Cantonese)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/cantonese) - [داری (Dari)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/dari) - [English](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/english) - [Français (French)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/french) - [Ελληνικά (Greek)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/greek) - [آزرگی (Hazaragi)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/hazaragi) - [हिंदी (Hindi)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/hindi) - [Bahasa (Indonesian)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/indonesian) - [日本語 (Japanese)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/japanese) - [한국어 (Korean)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/korean) - [македонски (Macedonian)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/macedonian) - [普通话 (Mandarin)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/mandarin) - [नेपाली (Nepali)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/nepali) - [پښتو (Pashto)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/pashto) - [فارسی (Persian)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/persian) - [ਪੰਜਾਬੀ (Punjabi)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/punjabi) - [Samoa (Samoan)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/samoan) - [සිංහල (Sinhalese)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/sinhalese) - [Española (Spanish)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/spanish) - [kiswahili (Swahili)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/swahili) - [Tagalog (Filipino)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/tagalog-filipino) - [தமிழ் (Tamil)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/tamil) - [แบบไทย (Thai)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/thai) - [Türkçe (Turkish)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/turkish) - [українська (Ukrainian)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/ukrainian) - [اردو (Urdu)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/urdu) - [Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/information-your-language/vietnamese) - [Artificial Intelligence transparency statement](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [Careers](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/careers) Toggle submenu - [How to apply for a job at the Commission](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/careers/how-apply-job-commission) - [Education and engagement activities](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/education-and-engagement-activities) Toggle submenu - [Paid agents consultation](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/commission-engagement-activities/paid-agents-consultation) - [International engagement](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/commission-engagement-activities/international-engagement) - [Stakeholder user groups](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/commission-engagement-activities/stakeholder-user-groups) - [History – The Sir Richard Kirby Archives](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history) Toggle submenu - [Past Presidents and Members](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/past-presidents-and-members) - [The history of the Australian minimum wage](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/history-australian-minimum-wage) - [Waltzing Matilda and the Sunshine Harvester Factory](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory) Toggle submenu - [Harvester case](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/harvester-case) - [The book](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/book) - [The film](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/film) - [Comparing minimum wage systems](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/comparing-minimum-wage-systems) - [Educational material](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/educational-material) - [Papers and historical material](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material) Toggle submenu - [Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material-1) - [Cost of living newspaper articles from the early 1900s](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material-4) - [Metal trades base level minimum wages [1967–2015]](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material-0) - [Reducing hours of work](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material-3) - [The Victorian minimum wage [1896]](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/waltzing-matilda-and-sunshine-harvester-factory/papers-and-historical-material-2) - [Historic decisions](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/historic-decisions) - [Historic annual wage decisions](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/history/historic-annual-wage-decisions) - [Legal and Freedom of Information](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information) Toggle submenu - [Freedom of information](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/freedom-information) Toggle submenu - [FOI disclosure log](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/freedom-information/foi-disclosure-log) - [Information publication plan](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/information-publication-plan) - [Information publication scheme](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/information-publication-scheme) - [Public interest disclosure scheme](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/public-interest-disclosure-scheme) - [Fraud and corruption](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/fraud-and-corruption) - [About the website](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/about-website) Toggle submenu - [Accessibility](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/about-website/accessibility) - [Copyright](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/about-website/copyright) - [Disclaimer](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/about-website/disclaimer) - [Privacy](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/privacy) Toggle submenu - [Privacy policy](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/privacy/privacy-policy) - [Privacy Impact Assessment Register](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/privacy/privacy-impact-assessment-register) - [Social media terms of use](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-and-freedom-information/social-media-terms-use) - [Legislation and regulations](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legislation-and-regulations) - [Members & case allocations](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations) Toggle submenu - [Case allocation system](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system) Toggle submenu - [BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) Projects](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/bhp-billiton-mitsubishi-alliance-bma) - [Barangaroo South Development Project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/barangaroo-south-development-project) - [Chevron Gorgon Gas Project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/chevron-gorgon-gas-project) - [Cross River Rail Project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/cross-river-rail-project) - [INPEX Timor Sea Oil & Gas Project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/inpex-timor-sea-oil-gas-project) - [Wheatstone Gas Project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/case-allocation-system/wheatstone-gas-project) - [List of Commission Members](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/members-case-allocations/list-commission-members) - [Operations](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations) Toggle submenu - [Agency file listing](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/agency-file-listing) - [Budgets & expenditure](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/budgets-expenditure) Toggle submenu - [Audit Committee](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/budgets-expenditure/audit-committee) - [eInvoicing](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/budgets-expenditure/einvoicing) - [Grants](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/grants) - [Service charter](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/service-charter) - [Statement of commitment to First Nations Australians](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/statement-commitment-first-nations-australians) - [Tenders & contracts](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/operations/tenders-contracts) - [Reporting and publications](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications) Toggle submenu - [Commonwealth Child Safe Framework](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/legal-governance-and-reporting/reporting-and-publications/commonwealth-child-safe) - [Corporate plans](https://www.fwc.gov.au/corporate-plan) - [Annual reports](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/annual-reports) - [General Manager's reports](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/general-managers-reports) Toggle submenu - [Reports](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/general-managers-reports/reports) - [Partnership research projects](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/general-managers-reports/partnership-research-projects) - [Quarterly reports](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/quarterly-reports) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [FWC Bulletin](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-publications/fwc-bulletin) - [Research](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research) Toggle submenu - [Annual wage review research](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research/annual-wage-review-research) - [Australian workplace relations study](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research/australian-workplace-relations-study) - [Equal remuneration research report](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research/equal-remuneration-research-report) - [Promoting productive enterprise agreements project](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research/promoting-productive-enterprise-agreements-project) - [User experience feedback & research](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/strategy-and-research/research/user-experience-feedback-research) - [Unacceptable behaviour towards Commission staff ](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/unacceptable-behaviour-towards-commission-staff) - [Diversity and inclusion](https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/diversity-and-inclusion)# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Introduction The Di …Only the page's breadcrumb navigation dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.dva.gov.au/) 1. [About Us](https://www.dva.gov.au/about-us) 1. [Corporate Governance](https://www.dva.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance) 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement# Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Last updated 9 …Only a site navigation menu block dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ou think](https://www.dss.gov.au/contact-us/enquiries-and-feedback).## [ Doing business with us ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us) Skip to main content - [ Corporate policies ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies) - [ Data integration ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/data-integration) - [ Emissions Reduction Plan ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/emissions-reduction-plan) - [ Metadata for research datasets ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/metadata-research-datasets) - [ Vulnerability disclosure ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/vulnerability-disclosure-policy) - [ AI transparency statement ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/corporate-policies/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement) - [ Protection from scams ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/protection-scams) - [ Purchasing ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/purchasing) - [ Sponsorship ](https://www.dss.gov.au/doing-business-us/sponsorship)DSS3370 | Permalink: www.dss.gov.au/node/3370 Last modified 28 August 2025.No change by the agency; only breadcrumb navigation and an "On this page" heading from the site template dropped out of the capture.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
1. [Home](https://www.industry.gov.au/) / 1. [Publications](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications) / 1. Artificial intelligence transparency statement# Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 … Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026)## On this pageOur department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developin …Only the page's "On this page" navigation heading dropped out of the capture; the agency's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
On this pageThe Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’s commitment to the sa …Only the site's navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
In this section ## [About us](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us) - [About the department](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/department/about-the-department) - [Grant outcomes](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/grant-opportunities/Pages/grant-outcomes) - [DFAT grants framework](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/grant-opportunities/Pages/dfat-grants-framework) - [Our locations](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/our-locations/Pages/our-locations) - [Our people](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/our-people) - [Our services](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/our-services) - [Publications](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications) - [Corporate information and resources](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/corporate-information-and-resources) - [Logos and style guides](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/logos-and-style-guides) - [Public Interest Certificate](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/public-interest-certificate) - [Certifications](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/certifications) - [Freedom of information](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/freedom-of-information) - [Privacy](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/privacy) - [Transparency](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/transparency) - [New departmental files](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/new-departmental-files) - [Portfolio budget statements](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/portfolio-budget-statements) - [Fraud and Corruption Control in DFAT](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/fraud-corruption-control) - [Regulatory functions](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/regulatory-functions) - [Audit and Risk Committee](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/corporate-information-and-resources/audit-and-risk-committee) - [Legal Services Expenditure](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/legal-services-expenditure) - [Subpoenas](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/Pages/subpoenas) - [Protocol Privacy Collection Statement](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/protocol-privacy-collection-statement) - [Senate Order on entity contracts](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/senate-order-on-entity-contracts) - [Executive Remuneration Reporting](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/Pages/executive-remuneration-reporting) - Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement - [Consular Privacy Collection Statement](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/consular-privacy-collection-statement) - [DFAT Employee Census](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/dfat-employee-census) - [Data Sharing Applications](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/corporate/corporate-information-and-resources/data-sharing-applications) - [Business opportunities](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/business-opportunities) - [Foreign representatives in Australia](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/foreign-embassies/foreign-embassies-and-consulates-in-australia) - [History of Australian diplomacy](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/history-of-australian-diplomacy/history-of-australian-diplomacy) - [About this website](https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/about-this-website/Pages/about-this-website)# Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement DFAT is investi …Only a sidebar navigation menu scraped from the page has dropped out; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Skip to main content ## Sidebar first - About - [Our commitment to you](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment) - [First Nations people](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/first-nations) - [Accessibility](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/accessibility) - [Client service charter](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/client-service-charter) - [Claiming compensation](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/compensation) - [Compliance Policy](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/compliance-policy) - [Information management and public data](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/information-public-data) - [Integrity](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/integrity) - [National Redress Scheme](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/national-redress-scheme) - [Privacy](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/privacy) - [Regulator Performance](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/regulator-performance) - [Environmental compliance](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/environmental-compliance) - [Environmental Compliance Plan 2024-25](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/environmental-compliance/compliance-plan-2024-25) - [Health, Safety and Wellbeing Commitment Statement](https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/commitment/work-health-safety-statement)Skip to page navigation # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statem …Only a navigation sidebar of reporting links dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Sidebar first - About - [Reporting obligations](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations) - [Report on agency appointments](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/agency-appointments) - [Senate Order for Entity contracts listing](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/contracts) - [Documents tabled in Parliament](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/documents-tabled) - [Australian public service employee census](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/employee-census) - [Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/operations-emissions-reduction) - [Executive and highly-paid staff remuneration](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/executive-remuneration) - [Gifts and benefits](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/gifts-benefits) - [Government responses](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/government-responses) - [Grants reporting](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/grants) - [Indexed list of files](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/indexed-files) - [Legal expenditure](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/legal-expenditure) - [AI transparency statement](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/AI-transparency-statement) - [Campaign certification statements](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/campaign-certification)# Artificial Intelligence transparency statement The [Policy for the …Only the breadcrumb navigation links dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
- [About us](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about) - [Forms and publications](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs) - [Corporate publications](https://www.comcare.gov.au/about/forms-pubs/docs/pubs/corporate-publications) - AI Transparency StatementShare this page: Share to Print Print \[Share to Email Email \](mailt …Only site breadcrumb and navigation menus dropped from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## You are here 1. [Home](https://www.cgc.gov.au/) 1. [About us](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us) 1. [Accountability and reporting](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting) 1. Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ## Main navigation In this section ## [About us](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us "About us") - [Commonwealth Grants Commission](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/commonwealth-grants-commission "Commonwealth Grants Commission") - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/reconciliation-action-plan "Reconciliation Action Plan") - [Accountability and reporting](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting "Accountability and reporting") - [Annual Report](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/corporate-governance/publications/corporate-plan-2021-22 "Annual Report") - [Corporate Plan](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-plan "Corporate Plan") - [APS Employee Census](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/aps-employee-census "APS Employee Census") - [Portfolio Budget Statements](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/portfolio-budget-statements "Portfolio Budget Statements") - [Audit and risk committee charter](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/audit-and-risk-committee-charter "Audit and risk committee charter") - [Freedom of information](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-information "Freedom of information") - [Information publication scheme](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/information-publication-scheme "Information publication scheme") - [Information disclosure](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/information-disclosure) - [Annual Statement of Compliance with the Child Safe Framework and Risk Management Assessment](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/annual-statement-compliance-child-safe-framework-and-risk-management-assessment "Annual Statement of Compliance with the Child Safe Framework and Risk Management Assessment") - [Legal services expenditure](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/legal-services-expenditure "Legal services expenditure") - [Procedures for determining suspected breaches of the code of conduct](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/procedures-determining-suspected-breaches-code-conduct "Procedures for determining suspected breaches of the code of conduct") - [Public interest disclosure reporting](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/public-interest-disclosure-reporting "Public interest disclosure reporting") - [Senate order for departmental file lists](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/senate-order-departmental-file-lists "Senate order for departmental file lists") - [Senate order for entity contracts](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/senate-order-entity-contracts "Senate order for entity contracts") - [Gifts and Benefits Register](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/gifts-and-benefits-register "Gifts and Benefits Register") - Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement - [Corporate Publications](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-publications) - [Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/emissions-reduction-plan) - [Fraud and corruption](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/fraud-and-corruption) - [Careers](https://www.cgc.gov.au/about-us/careers "Careers")Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www …Only navigation menus and breadcrumbs dropped from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/) 1. [About Us](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us) 1. AI Transparency Statement ##### Secondary Menu - [About Us](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us) - [Director](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/director) - [Our National Practice](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/our-national-practice) - [Organisation Chart](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/organisation-chart) - [Corporate Plan](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/corporate-plan) - [International Work](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/international-work) - [Law Reform](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/law-reform) - [Accountability and Reporting](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting) - [Annual Report](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/publications?field_publication_type_target_id=21&field_date_value%5Bmin%5D=-10%20years&field_date_value%5Bmax%5D=%2B1%20years) - [Diversity and Inclusion](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/diversity-and-inclusion) - [Media](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/media) - [AI Transparency Statement](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/about-us/ai-transparency-statement) - [Careers](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/careers) - [Partner Agencies](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/partner-agencies) - [Newsroom](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/newsroom) - [Publications](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/publications) - [Contact Us](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/contact-us) ##### Sidebar menu - [Prosecution Process](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/prosecution-process) - [Crimes We Prosecute](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/crimes-we-prosecute) - [Case Reports](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/case-reports) - [Prosecution Statistics](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/statistics) - [Victims and Witnesses](https://victimsandwitnesses.cdpp.gov.au) - [Counsel](https://www.cdpp.gov.au/counsel)# AI Transparency Statement The Office of the Director of Public Pros …Only a stray "On this page" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… 0for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)## On this pageSidebar navigation links dropped and breadcrumbs re-nested by the scraper; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
[Reporting and accountability](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability "Reporting and accountability") - [Regulation reporting](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/regulation-reporting "Regulation reporting") - [Annual reports](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/annual-reports "Annual reports") - [Corporate Plan](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/corporate-plan "Corporate Plan") - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/gifts-and-benefits-register "Gifts and benefits register") - [Consultation](https://www.asqa.gov.au/how-we-regulate/how-we-engage-and-educate/consultation "Consultation") - [Service Charter and service standards](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/service-charter-service-standards "Service Charter and service standards") - [Surveys](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/surveys "Surveys") - [2023 ASQA Provider and Course Owner Survey Results](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/surveys/2023-asqa-provider-and-course-owner-survey-results "2023 ASQA Provider and Course Owner Survey Results") - [Corporate publications](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/corporate-publications "Corporate publications") - [Privacy policy](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/privacy-policy "Privacy policy") - [APS employee census results](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/aps-employee-census-results "APS employee census results") - [Financial reporting](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/financial-reporting "Financial reporting") - [Freedom of information](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/freedom-information "Freedom of information") - [Vulnerability Disclosure Statement](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/vulnerability-disclosure-statement "Vulnerability Disclosure Statement") - [Harradine report](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/harradine-report "Harradine report") - [Information publication scheme](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about/reporting-and-accountability/information-publication-scheme "Information publication scheme") - [Child Safety Policy](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/child-safety-policy "Child Safety Policy") - [ASQA Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/asqa-emissions-reduction-plan "ASQA Emissions Reduction Plan") - [Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement "Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement") - [Home](https://www.asqa.gov.au/) - [About us](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us)- [Home](https://www.asqa.gov.au/) - [About us](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us) - [Reporting and accountability](https://www.asqa.gov.au/about-us/reporting-and-accountability)Only the page's title heading is absent from this capture; ASIC's statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Artificial intelligence transparency statementASIC’s Artificial intelligence (AI) transparency statement is issued f …Only site navigation — breadcrumbs and an "In this section" menu — dropped from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## You are here 1. [Home](https://www.apsc.gov.au/) 1. [About us](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us) 1. [Accountability and reporting](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting)# Transparent Use of AI at the Commission Published 28 February 2025 … re via email") \[Print\](javascript:if(window.print)window.print())In this section ## [About us](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us) - [What we do](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do) - [Who we are](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are) - [What we offer](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/working-commission/what-we-offer) - [Working at the Commission](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/working-commission) - [Accountability and reporting](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting "A central location for the Commission's key areas of accountability and reporting") - [Annual reports](https://www.apsc.gov.au/accountability-reporting/annual-reports) - [Audit and Risk Management Committee Charter](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/audit-and-risk-management-committee-charter) - [Child Protection – Annual child safety statement of compliance](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/child-safety-statement) - [Corporate plan](https://www.apsc.gov.au/publication/corporate-plan-2024-28 "The Australian Public Service Commission's corporate plan for 2023-27") - [Emissions reduction plan](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/emissions-reduction-plan) - [Fraud control plan](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/fraud-control-plan) - [Freedom of Information](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/freedom-information) - [Gifts and hospitality](https://www.apsc.gov.au/accountability-reporting/gifts-hospitality) - [Information Publication Scheme (IPS)](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/information-publication-scheme-ips) - [Parliamentary reporting](https://www.apsc.gov.au/accountability-reporting/parliamentary-reporting) - [Portfolio Budget Statements](https://www.apsc.gov.au/accountability-reporting/portfolio-budget-statements) - [Procedures for determining breaches of the Code of Conduct, suspensions and the imposition of sanctions](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/procedure-breaches-code-conduct) - [Public Interest Disclosure Scheme](https://www.apsc.gov.au/public-interest-disclosure-scheme) - Transparent Use of AI at the Commission - [Vulnerability Disclosure Policy](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/vulnerability-disclosure-policy) - [Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) Employer Statement](https://www.apsc.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/workplace-gender-equality-agency-wgea-employer-statement)## AI Transparency Statement The Commission is dedicated to the safe, …Only a leftover site navigation menu disappeared from the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… n any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy.## Header - [Vision and Purpose](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/vision-and-purpose) - [Governance](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/governance) - [Operations](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/operations) - [Structure](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/structure) - [Careers](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/careers) - [Access to Information](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/access-information) - [Compliance Reporting](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting) - [Legal Services](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/legal-services) - [Senate Order on Government Contracts](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/senate-order-government-contracts) - [Indexed List of Agency Files](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/indexed-list-agency-files) - [Remuneration](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/remuneration) - [Audit and Risk Committee Charter](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reports/audit-and-risk-committee-charter) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [Procedures for breaches of code of conduct](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reports/breaches-code-conduct) - [Commonwealth Child Safe Framework Statement of Compliance](https://www.aofm.gov.au/about/compliance-reporting/commonwealth-child-safe-framework-annual-statement-compliance)Only the Cloudflare email-obfuscation codes in the contact and share links changed; the statement's text is identical.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… t [[email protected]](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abcac2ebcac2cdd885ccc4dd85cade2c3cbe2c3cbc4d18cc5cdd48cc3d7). Change history ## Change history Date| Note\ ---|---\ 23 June 20 … re to Linkedin") [ ](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#221d515740484741561f636b0710125650434c51524350474c415b07101251564356474f474c5604404d465b1f4a56565251180d0d434b44510c454d540c43570d4f434b4c0d524d4e4b414b47510d434b0f5650434c51524350474c415b0f51564356474f474c5631c505641494640571e626a0611135751424d50534251464d405a06111350574257464e464d5705414c475a1e4b57575350190c0c424a45500d444c550d42560c4e424a4d0c534c4f4a404a46500c424a0e5751424d50534251464d405a0e50574257464e464d57 "Share to E-mail")Site navigation menus and breadcrumbs dropped from the capture; the statement's own text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Attorney-General’s Department Artificial Intelligence Transparency StatementYou are here 1. [Home](https://www.ag.gov.au/) 1. [About us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us) 1. [Accountability and reporting](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting) 1. Attorney-General’s Department Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Print In this section ## [About us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us) - [What we do](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do) - [Australian Government Solicitor](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/australian-government-solicitor) - [Rule of law](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/rule-law) - [Commissions and inquiries](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/commissions-and-inquiries) - [Who we are](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are) - [Our executive](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive) - [Biographical details—Katherine Jones PSM](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive/biographical-details-katherine-jones-psm) - [Biographical details—Tamsyn Harvey](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive/biographical-details-tamsyn-harvey) - [Biographical details—Sarah Chidgey](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive/biographical-details-sarah-chidgey-psm) - [Biographical details—Matthew Blunn](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive/biographical-details-matthew-blunn) - [Biographical details—Cameron Gifford](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-executive/biographical-details-cameron-gifford) - [Solicitor-General](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/solicitor-general) - [Portfolio agencies](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/portfolio-agencies) - [Committees and councils](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/committees-and-councils) - [Audit and Risk Committee](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/committees-and-councils/audit-and-risk-committee) - [Standing Council of Attorneys-General](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/committees-and-councils/standing-council-attorneys-general) - [Careers](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers) - [Work with us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/work-us) - [Our culture](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/our-culture) - [Pay and Gender at AGD](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/our-culture/pay-and-gender-agd) - [What we expect](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/what-we-expect) - [Apply to work with us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/apply-work-us) - [Apply now](https://agcareers.nga.net.au/?AudienceTypeCode=EXT) - [Employment Programs](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/employment-programs) - [AGD Graduate Program](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/employment-programs/attorney-generals-department-graduate-program) - [Graduate stories](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/employment-programs/attorney-generals-department-graduate-program/graduate-stories) - [Statutory appointments](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/statutory-appointments) - [National Native Title Tribunal Full-time Member](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/statutory-appointments/national-native-title-tribunal-full-time-member) - [Appointments to the Administrative Review Tribunal](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/statutory-appointments/appointments-administrative-review-tribunal) - [List of persons on assessment panel](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/statutory-appointments/appointments-administrative-review-tribunal/list-persons-assessment-panel) - [First Nations Employment Hub](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/careers/first-nations-employment-hub) - [Accountability and reporting](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting) - [Agency Head gifts and benefits register](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/agency-head-gifts-and-benefits-register) - Attorney-General’s Department Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement - [Regulatory Reform](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/regulatory-reform) - [Annual reports](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/annual-reports) - [Corporate plan](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-plan) - [Budgets](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/budgets) - [Tenders and contracts](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/tenders-and-contracts) - [Senate Order Contracts](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/tenders-and-contracts/senate-order-contracts) - [Grants](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/grants) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/agd-employee-gifts-and-benefits-register) - [Solicitor-General gifts and benefits register](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/solicitor-general-gifts-and-benefits-register) - [Public Interest Certificates](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/public-interest-certificates) - [Public interest disclosure](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/public-interest-disclosure) - [Report fraud against the department](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/report-fraud-against-department) - [Commonwealth legal services expenditure](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/commonwealth-legal-services-expenditure) - [Privacy policy](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy) - [The personal information we hold and how you can access and correct it](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy/personal-information-we-hold-and-how-you-can-access-and-correct-it) - [Privacy Impact Assessment Register](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy/privacy-impact-assessment-register) - [Visiting our websites](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/privacy-policy/visiting-our-websites) - [Campaign certification statements](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/campaign-certification-statements) - [Connect with us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us) - [Scheme for Compensation for Detriment caused by Defective Administration](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/scheme-compensation-detriment-caused-defective-administration) - [Contact us](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/contact-us) - [Media](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/media) - [Social media](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/social-media) - [Client Service Charter](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/connect-us/client-service-charter) - [Publications](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/publications) - [Consultations](https://www.ag.gov.au/about-us/consultations)Print ## Introduction We are trialling the use of Artificial Intelligence …Only the site's "About us" navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… countable official and transparency statement. Skip to body content## About us - [Who we are](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are) - [What we do](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do) - [Criminal assets management](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/criminal-assets-management) - [Our legislation](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/our-legislation) - [Bankruptcy Act amendment](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/our-legislation/bankruptcy-act-amendment) - [Engage with us](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/engage-us) - [Consumer Consultative Panel](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/engage-us/consumer-consultative-panel) - [Consumer Consultative Panel Terms of Reference](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/engage-us/consumer-consultative-panel/terms-reference) - [Regulation, compliance and enforcement](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance) - [Regulatory Strategy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/regulatory-strategy) - [Regulatory Action Statement](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/regulatory-strategy/action-statement) - [Compliance and Enforcement Policy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/compliance-and-enforcement-policy) - [Regulatory Review](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/regulatory-review) - [Fraud & Corruption Control Plan](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/fraud-corruption-control-plan) - [Untrustworthy advisors: A hidden scourge in Australia’s personal insolvency system](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/regulation-and-compliance/untrustworthy-advisors-hidden-scourge) - [Accountability and reporting](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting) - [Access our information](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/access-our-information) - [Freedom of information (FOI)](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/access-our-information/freedom-information) - [FOI disclosure log](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/access-our-information/freedom-information/disclosure-log) - [Indexed list of files](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/access-our-information/indexed-list-files) - [Information Publication Scheme](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/access-our-information/information-publication-scheme) - [AFSA's legal services expenditure](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/afsas-legal-services-expenditure) - [Annual reports](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/annual-reports) - [Audit and Risk Committee](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/audit-and-risk-committee) - [Corporate plan](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-plan) - [Cost recovery policy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/cost-recovery-policy) - [Gifts and benefits register](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/gifts-and-benefits-register) - [Portfolio Budget Statement](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/portfolio-budget-statement) - [Government contracts](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/government-contracts) - [AI Transparency Statement](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ai-transparency-statement) - [Ministerial statements of expectations](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/ministerial-statement-expectations-and-afsa-statement-intent) - [Key documents](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents) - [AFSA Child Safety Framework](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/child-safe-framework-compliance-statement-2025-2026) - [Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Strategy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-strategy) - [Agency Capability Review](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/agency-capability-review) - [Client Service Charter](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/client-service-charter) - [Gender and pay equity at AFSA](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/gender-and-pay-equity-afsa) - [IPS Agency Plan](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/ips-agency-plan) - [Reconciliation Action Plan](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/reconciliation-action-plan) - [Vulnerability Strategy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/key-documents/vulnerability-strategy) - [News and media](https://www.afsa.gov.au/news) - [PIR newsletter](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media/pir-newsletter) - [Newsletter archive](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media/pir-newsletter/archive) - [Statistics and insights](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights) - Headline statistics - [Monthly personal insolvency statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/monthly-personal-insolvency-statistics) - [Quarterly personal insolvency statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/quarterly-personal-insolvency-statistics) - [Financial year personal insolvency statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/headline-statistics/financial-year-personal-insolvency-statistics) - [PPSR quarterly statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/headline-statistics/ppsr-quarterly-statistics) - System insights - [State of the Personal Insolvency System](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/system-insights/state-personal-insolvency-system) - [State of the Personal Property Securities System](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/system-insights/state-personal-property-securities-system-2023-24) - [Feature analyses](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/system-insights/feature-analyses) - [People in personal insolvencies with less than $50,000 in liabilities](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/system-insights/feature-analyses/people-personal-insolvencies-less-50000-liabilities) - Administration statistics - [Annual administration statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/administration-statistics/annual-administration-statistics) - [Inspector-General statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/administration-statistics/inspector-general-statistics) - Statistics support - [Statistics release schedule](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/statistics-support/statistics-release-schedule) - [Discontinued statistics](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/statistics-support/discontinued-statistics) - [Requesting non-standard data and information for research](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/statistics-and-insights/statistics-support/requesting-non-standard-data-and-information-research) - [Complaints and reviews](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews) - [Appeal a decision](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/can-i-appeal) - [How to lodge a complaint](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/how-lodge-complaint) - [Reporting misconduct to AFSA](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/reporting-misconduct-afsa) - [Request for review](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/request-review) - [Applying for compensation](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/applying-compensation) - [Procurement complaints](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/procurement-complaints) - [Unreasonable complainant conduct – model policy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/unreasonable-complainant-conduct-model-policy) - [Public interest disclosures (whistleblowing)](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/complaints-and-reviews/public-interest-disclosures-whistleblowing) - [About our site](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site) - [Accessibility](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/accessibility) - [Copyright](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/copyright) - [Sitemap](https://www.afsa.gov.au/sitemap) - [Online security](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/online-security) - [AFSA’s Security Vulnerability Disclosure Policy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/online-security/afsas-security-vulnerability-disclosure-policy) - [Terms and Conditions](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/terms-and-conditions) - [Account customer terms and conditions](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/terms-and-conditions/account-customer-terms-and-conditions) - [Online Services terms and conditions](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/terms-and-conditions/online-services-terms-and-conditions) - [Terms and conditions (for Online Services)](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/terms-and-conditions/terms-and-conditions-online-services) - [Privacy policy](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/privacy-policy) - [Privacy impact assessment register](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/about-our-site/privacy-policy/privacy-impact-assessment-register) - [Careers](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers) - [Current vacancies](https://www.afsa.gov.au/current-vacancies) - [What we offer](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers/what-we-offer) - [AFSA base salaries](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers/what-we-offer/afsa-base-salaries) - [How to apply for a job at AFSA](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers/how-apply-job-afsa) - [Our employee census results](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers/aps-census) - [Procedures for determining breaches of the Code of Conduct and for determining sanctions](https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/careers/procedures-determining-breaches-code-conduct-and-determining-sanctions)## On this page ## AI transparency statement The Digital Transformat …Only site navigation links and duplicated breadcrumbs dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
[ Reporting and Accountability](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability)  [ Information publication scheme](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/information-publication-scheme) [ Information Publication Scheme – Operational Information](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/information-publication-scheme/information-publication-scheme) [ Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) [ Public Interest Disclosure](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/public-interest-disclosure) [ Freedom of information](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/freedom-information) [ AFMA disclosure log](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/afma-disclosure-log) [ Client Services Charter](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/client-services-charter) [ Commonwealth Procurement Rules ](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/commonwealth-procurement-rules) [ Privacy Policy](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/privacy-policy) [ Privacy Impact Assessment Register](https://www.afma.gov.au/privacy-policy/privacy-impact-assessment-register) [ Fisheries management policies](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies) [ Allocation of fishing concessions where management arrangements change (FMP 8)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/allocation-fishing-concessions-where) [ AFMA’s procedure for recovering unpaid fees, charges, and other monies - Fisheries Management Paper No. 6 (FMP6)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/afmas-procedure-recovering-unpaid-fees) [ Managing undercatch and overcatch of quota (FMP 10)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/managing-undercatch-and-overcatch-quota) [ Transhipping Policy and Guidelines](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/transhipping-policy-and-guidelines) [ Scientific permits (FMP 11)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/scientific-permits-fmp-11) [ Quota Administration Policy (FMP 13)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/quota-administration-policy-fmp-13) [ Resource assessment groups operational guidelines and procedures (FAP 12)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/resource-assessment-groups-operational) [ Operation of management advisory committees (FMP 1)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/operation-management-advisory-committees) [ Information disclosure (FMP 12)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/information-disclosure-fmp-12) [ Fisheries Research and Science Quality Assurance Policy (FMP 16)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/fisheries-research-and-science-quality) [ Disposal of fishing vessels, catch and gear (FMP 3)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/disposal-fishing-vessels-catch-and-gear) [ Developmental Fisheries Policy (FMP 5)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/developmental-fisheries-policy-fmp-5) [ Information and advice for industry members on AFMA committees (FAP 7)](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/fisheries-management-policies/information-and-advice-industry-members) [ Australian Fisheries Management Employer Statement](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability/australian-fisheries-management-employer-statement) Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.afma.gov.au/ "Go to Home page") 1. [Reporting and Accountability](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability "Go to Reporting and Accountability page") 1. Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.afma.gov.au/ "Go to Home page") 1. [Reporting and Accountability](https://www.afma.gov.au/reporting-and-accountability "Go to Reporting and Accountability page") 1. Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement# Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement On this page The [p …Only the site's footer links, social media icons and copyright block dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… egulation & safeguards - AEC environmental assessment (January 2025)##### Connect with us [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/AusElectoralCom) [\_\_Twitter](https://twitter.com/AusElectoralCom) [\_\_Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/AusElectoralCom) [\_\_Threads](https://www.threads.net/AusElectoralCom) [\_\_ YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/AECTV) [ \_\_Flickr](https://www.flickr.com/photos/auselectoralcom/albums)[ \_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/australian-electoral-commission/)[ \_\_TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@auselectoralcom) ##### Services - [Work with us](https://www.aec.gov.au/employment/) - [Fraud](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/fraud.htm) - [FAQs](https://www.aec.gov.au/faqs/) - [Glossary](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/Glossary.htm) ##### About - [Contact us](https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Contact_the_AEC/index.htm) - [Accessibility](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/accessibility.htm) - [Privacy](https://www.aec.gov.au/privacy/) - [Security](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/security.htm) - [Copyright](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/Copyright.htm) - [Disclaimer](https://www.aec.gov.au/footer/Disclaimer.htm) - [Access to information](https://www.aec.gov.au/information-access/)  The AEC acknowledges the Traditional Owners of country throughout Australia and recognises their continuing connection to land, waters, culture and community. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. © Australian Electoral Commission 2025 Authorised by the Electoral Commissioner, CanberraBack to topOnly the site's breadcrumb and navigation menu dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
## Breadcrumb - [Home](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/) - [About us](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us) - [Policies, privacy and reporting](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting) - Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement ### [About us](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us) - Open/Close Menu[Strategies and plans](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans) - [Corporate plans](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/corporate-plans) - [Reconciliation Action Plans](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/reconciliation-action-plans) - [Leadership Strategy](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/leadership-strategy) - [Workforce Strategy](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/workforce-strategy) - [Assessment framework for mHealth apps](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/assessment-framework-for-mhealth-apps) - [Cyber Security Strategy](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/cyber-security-strategy) - [Clinical Governance Framework](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/clinical-governance-framework) - [Conformance Framework](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/conformance-framework) - [National Digital Health Capability Action Plan](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/national-digital-health-capability-action-plan) - [Clinical Governance Performance Report](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/clinical-governance-performance-report) - [Health Connect Australia Strategy, Architecture and Roadmap](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/health-connect-australia-strategy-architecture-and-roadmap) - [National Healthcare Interoperability Plan](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/national-healthcare-interoperability-plan) - [National Healthcare Identifiers Roadmap](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/national-healthcare-identifiers-roadmap) - Open/Close Menu[Policies, privacy and reporting](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting) - [Procurement, tenders and contracts](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/procurement-tenders-and-contracts) - Open/Close Menu[Freedom of Information (FOI)](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/freedom-of-information-foi) - [Freedom of Information (FOI) disclosure log](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/freedom-of-information-foi/foi-disclosure-log) - [Information publication scheme (IPS)](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/freedom-of-information-foi/information-publication-scheme-ips) - [Information Publication Scheme (IPS) Agency Plan](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/freedom-of-information-foi/information-publication-scheme-agency-plan) - [Public Interest Disclosure](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/public-interest-disclosure) - [APS employee census results](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/aps-employee-census-results) - [Registers](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/registers) - [Senate Order Reporting](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/senate-order-reporting) - [Privacy policy](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/privacy-policy) - [Terms of Use ](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/terms-of-use) - [My Health Record legislation and governance](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/my-health-record-legislation-and-governance) - [Agency Enterprise Agreement](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/agency-enterprise-agreement) - [Code of Conduct (Principles and Procedures)](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/code-of-conduct-principles-and-procedures) - [Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/artificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [Workplace Health and Safety](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/workplace-health-and-safety) - [Service of legal documents](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/policies-privacy-and-reporting/service-of-legal-documents) - Open/Close Menu[Organisational structure](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure) - [Board Advisory Committees](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure/board-advisory-committees) - [Executive remuneration information](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/organisational-structure/executive-remuneration-information) - [Annual reports](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/annual-reports) - [Our websites](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/our-websites) - [Accessibility](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/accessibility) - Open/Close Menu[Careers](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/careers) - [Graduate program - Australian Digital Health Agency](https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/careers/graduate-program)Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Australian Digital Health Agency (the Agency) is committed to su …Only the page's on-this-page navigation list dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
# Planning and priorities We set strategic plans and priorities to guide our work and the benefits we aim to deliver. On this page- Corporate plan - Compliance priorities - Data strategy - Statement of intent - Review of the ACMA - ACMA AI transparency statement## Corporate plan Our [corporate plan](https://www.acma.gov.au/public …Only site navigation breadcrumbs and a sidebar list of related policy pages dropped out of the capture; the statement text is unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Search ABS## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.abs.gov.au/) 1. [About](https://www.abs.gov.au/about) 1. [Legislation and policy](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy) 1. AI transparency statement [Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.") ## [Legislation and policy](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy "Our privacy policy, Freedom of Information (FOI) disclosures and legislative framework.") - [Privacy](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/privacy "Our privacy policy and privacy impact statements.") - [Legislative framework](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/legislative-framework "The principal legislation that we work under.") - [Pre-release access policy](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/policy-pre-release-access-abs-statistics "How we ensure equity of access to all for our statistics and publications.") - [Documents tabled in Parliament](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/documents-tabled-parliament-abs "Our Senate Order lists and Survey documents tabled in parliament.") - [Procurement, contracts and registers](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/procurement-contracts-and-registers "How we obtain services and a list of all gifts we have received.") - [Australian Statistics Advisory Council (ASAC)](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/australian-statistics-advisory-council "The key advisory body to the Minister and the ABS on statistical services.") - [AI transparency statement](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "How we develop, deploy and manage artificial intelligence.") - [Commonwealth Child Safe Framework Statement of Compliance](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/2025-commonwealth-child-safe-framework-statement-compliance) - [Security vulnerability disclosure](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/security-vulnerability-disclosure "This policy gives a person a point of contact to directly submit their findings if they believe they have found a potential security vulnerability within ICT systems operated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.") - [Freedom of Information](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/freedom-information "Make an FOI request and browse the documents we have releases in response to FOI requests.") - [Public Interest Disclosure](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/public-interest-disclosure "Public officials can use the public interest disclosure to report suspected wrongdoing in the Australian public sector.") - [Audit and Risk Committee](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/audit-and-risk-committee "The Audit and Risk Committee's Charter.") - [ABS Institutional Environment](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/abs-institutional-environment "How we keep impartial and independent.") ## On this page ______________________________________________________________________[Print](https://www.abs.gov.au/about/legislation-and-policy/ai-transparency-statement "Print this page.") # AI transparency statement How we develop, deploy and manage artif …Only the Cloudflare email-obfuscation code in the contact link changed; the statement's text and contact address are unchanged.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ected]](https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b0bcbebea6bdbab0b2a7babcbda093a0b0a1b6b6bdb2a6a0a7a1b2bfbab2fdb4bca5fdb2a6791a1614140c17101a180d1016170a390a1a0b1c1c17180c0a0d0b18151018571e160f57180c) ## The Screen Guide Find information about Australian productions, …Both captures are failed fetches blocked by the site's firewall, with only the incident ID differing.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
Request unsuccessful. Incapsula incident ID: 808000440051107506-60747094069611271946560-100687768776608524- Digital Transformation Agencyfirst tracked
No change to the statement; only Cloudflare's rotating email-obfuscation codes in the contact and share links differ.
read by Claude Opus 5The words that changed
… ct [[email protected]](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a1a980a1a9a6b3eea7afb6eea1b5abcac2ebcac2cdd885ccc4dd85cade). Change history ## Change history Date| Note\ ---|---\ 23 June 20 … are to Linkedin") [ ](https://aifs.gov.au/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85baf6f0e7efe0e6f1b8c4cca0b7b5f1f7e4ebf6f5e4f7e0ebe6fca0b7b5f6f1e4f1e0e8e0ebf1a3e7eae1fcb8edf1f1f5f6bfaaaae4ece3f6abe2eaf3abe4f0aae8e4ecebaaf5eae9ece6ece0f6aae4eca8f1f7e4ebf6f5e4f7e0ebe6fca8f6f1e4f1e0e8e0ebf1221d515740484741561f636b0710125650434c51524350474c415b07101251564356474f474c5604404d465b1f4a56565251180d0d434b44510c454d540c43570d4f434b4c0d524d4e4b414b47510d434b0f5650434c51524350474c415b0f51564356474f474c56 "Share to E-mail")- Aged Care Quality and Safety Commissionfirst tracked
- Treasuryfirst tracked
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agencyfirst tracked
- Safe Work Australiafirst tracked
- Services Australiafirst tracked
- Screen Australiafirst tracked
- Professional Services Reviewfirst tracked
- Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinetfirst tracked
- Productivity Commissionfirst tracked
- Office of the Australian Information Commissionerfirst tracked
- National Indigenous Australians Agencyfirst tracked
- National Health and Medical Research Councilfirst tracked
- National Health Funding Bodyfirst tracked
- National Film and Sound Archive of Australiafirst tracked
- NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commissionfirst tracked
- National Capital Authorityfirst tracked
- National Blood Authorityfirst tracked
- National Archives of Australiafirst tracked
- Department of Home Affairsfirst tracked
- Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authorityfirst tracked
- Geoscience Australiafirst tracked
- Fair Work Commissionfirst tracked
- Department of Financefirst tracked
- Department of Educationfirst tracked
- Department of Veterans' Affairsfirst tracked
- Department of Social Servicesfirst tracked
- Department of Industry, Science and Resourcesfirst tracked
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageingfirst tracked
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Tradefirst tracked
- Department of Employment and Workplace Relationsfirst tracked
- Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestryfirst tracked
- Comcarefirst tracked
- Commonwealth Grants Commissionfirst tracked
- Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutionsfirst tracked
- Climate Change Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Trade and Investment Commissionfirst tracked
- Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centrefirst tracked
- Australian Transport Safety Bureaufirst tracked
- Australian Taxation Officefirst tracked
- Australian Skills Quality Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Securities and Investments Commissionfirst tracked
- Administrative Review Tribunalfirst tracked
- Australian Research Councilfirst tracked
- Australian Public Service Commissionfirst tracked
- Australian Office of Financial Managementfirst tracked
- Australian National Audit Officefirst tracked
- Australian Institute of Family Studiesfirst tracked
- Australian Institute of Criminologyfirst tracked
- Attorney-General's Departmentfirst tracked
- Australian Financial Security Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Fisheries Management Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Electoral Commissionfirst tracked
- Australian Digital Health Agencyfirst tracked
- Australian Communications and Media Authorityfirst tracked
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commissionfirst tracked
- Australian Bureau of Statisticsfirst tracked