ACQSC

Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 2 changes of substance across 4 versions · last changed 28 Sept 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed, and doesn’t say when it was first published.

  2. substantive Rewrites its statement to report an AI Policy approved in December 2025, discloses AI regulatory risk models, and names two AI accountable officials instead of the Chief Digital Officer.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Accountable official changed from the Chief Digital Officer to two officials: the Chief Digital Information Officer and the Director of AI
    • Discloses that AI analytics include regulatory risk models
    • New fact: Commission AI Policy approved 10 December 2025
    • New commitment to update the statement with its AI adoption strategy by 15 June 2026
    • Adopts the OECD definition of an AI system
    • Replaces 'no use of automated decision-making' with a statement that all Commission decisions are made and communicated by staff
    • Adds that the public are not required to interact with AI in dealings with the Commission
    • Last-updated date moves from February 2025 to February 2026
    • Added: New commitment (will): Will update the transparency statement to reflect the AI strategic position by 15 June 2026
    • Added: Safeguard added: acceptable use policy
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-02 → 2026-02
    Show the words that changed ↓
  3. substantive Rewrites its statement: names Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, appoints a Chief AI Officer, says its AI strategy is now developed, and sets out responsible AI principles and governance mechanisms.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Chief Data and Analytics Officer appointed as Chief AI Officer
    • Names Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as a staff productivity tool; staff must complete training before using approved AI tools
    • Commits that AI tools won't make decisions or take administrative action without human intervention; staff must verify outputs
    • Strategic position on AI adoption now developed (Digital and Data Strategy 2026–2029), replacing the promise to update the statement by 15 June 2026
    • Adds eight responsible AI principles, an internal AI use case register and escalation pathways that can suspend AI use
    • Adds a definition of AI's scope that excludes rules-based automation
    • Review trigger broadened to cover significant changes to its approach to AI or factors that affect the statement's accuracy
    • Removed: statement that Commission AI applications do not impact the public, softened to 'the public does not currently directly interact' with AI
    • Removed: list of DTA standards it complies with (accountable officials standard, generative AI guidance, AI Ethics Principles)
    • Removed: commitment to develop an AI strategy covering data governance, privacy and cybersecurity
    • Added: AI use-case register: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Chief AI Officer: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Named tool added: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
    • Added: New commitment (human oversight): AI does not determine compliance outcomes without human review
    • Added: New commitment (human oversight): Staff remain responsible for verifying AI-generated outputs and for all final decisions
    • Added: New commitment (will not): AI systems must not involve or result in unfair discrimination
    • Added: New commitment (will not): AI tools not approved to make decisions or take administrative action without human intervention
    • Added: New commitment (will): Every AI system must have an accountable owner and be assessed before use
    • Added: Safeguard added: human review of outputs
    • Added: Safeguard added: incident or concern reporting
    • Added: Safeguard added: risk assessment
    • Added: Safeguard added: use case register
    • Added: Staff training: available → mandatory
    • Added: Strategic position on AI: planned → in place
    • Changed: Commitment kept (will): Developing an AI strategy covering data governance, privacy and cybersecurity compliance
    • Changed: Commitment kept (will): Will develop and educate all staff with AI basics resources
    • Changed: Commitment kept (will): Will update the transparency statement to reflect the AI strategic position by 15 June 2026
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2026-02 → —
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The Commission says it uses AI, including Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, for analytics such as regulatory intelligence and risk analysis and for workplace productivity. Staff make all decisions, and it says no AI interacts directly with the public. It follows the DTA policy under its December 2025 AI Policy, a published strategic position, an internal use-case register, training staff must complete before using AI tools, accountable officials and a Chief AI Officer. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Compliance and fraud detection
  • Corporate and enabling
  • Service delivery

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat

Public-facing AI: none

Safeguards named: staff training, an acceptable-use policy, use-case register, incident or concern reporting, risk assessment, human review of outputs

The Standard’s eight elements 8 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Digital Information Officer; Director of AI
Strategic position on AI
in place
AI use-case register
in place
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
in place (Chief Data and Analytics Officer)

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
16 Jul 2026
Last change we saw
28 Sept 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • will not AI tools not approved to make decisions or take administrative action without human intervention
  • will not AI systems must not involve or result in unfair discrimination
  • human oversight Staff remain responsible for verifying AI-generated outputs and for all final decisions
  • human oversight AI does not determine compliance outcomes without human review
  • will Will update the transparency statement if AI use affecting or interacting with the public changes
  • will When AI is used more widely, will identify negative effects and protect the public and aged care recipients
  • will Will develop Commission-specific AI policies and processes alongside whole-of-government policies
  • will Will update the transparency statement at least once a year or as AI use changes
  • will Every AI system must have an accountable owner and be assessed before use

The statement

How to read this

The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically.

This statement explains how we use and govern AI, the safeguards we apply, and how the public can contact us about our use of AI.

We follow the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and related standards and guidance. (Template language)

The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI.

‘ An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ Also appears in 17 other agencies AASB ACCC ACMA AER AFSA AIC AIFS ARPANSA ART ASSEA AUASB AUSTRADE BOM CER FWC IPA PC

For the purposes of this statement, AI includes generative AI, machine learning and other tools that meet the OECD definition of an AI system. It does not include rules-based automation or workflow tools that follow pre-set instructions and do not infer how to generate outputs from the inputs they receive.

The Commission’s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. The Commission has developed its strategic position on AI adoption. This statement reflects our current approach and will be updated as our agency and our AI use evolve.

The Commission is committed to improving the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a safe and responsible way.

We see AI as both an opportunity and a strategic enabler. Used appropriately, AI can improve our ability to protect older people, strengthen regulatory intelligence, support risk-based oversight and reduce administrative burden for staff. We will use AI in a way that maintains public trust, regulatory integrity and human accountability.

The Commission has made Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat available to staff to support workplace productivity. Staff are expected to complete internal training before using approved AI tools. This training covers the foundations of safe and responsible AI use.

The Commission uses AI in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and frameworks. This includes obligations relating to privacy, information security, records management, freedom of information, procurement, administrative decision-making, delegations, accessibility and the Commission’s aged care regulatory functions.

We classify our AI use according to the DTA’s classification system for AI use. The usage patterns and domains that apply to the Commission’s AI use are listed below.

We use AI to identify patterns, trends and insights. This includes regulatory intelligence, risk analysis, reporting and modelling to support our work.

We use approved AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, to support routine workplace tasks. This may include summarising information, drafting content, and supporting research.

Decision making and administrative action Also appears in 4 other agencies ACMA DISR OPC SERVICESAUSTRALIA

Our AI tools are not approved to make decisions or take administrative action without human intervention. Staff may use approved AI tools to research, compare options, summarise evidence, identify risks, recommend wording or a course of action to support human decision making. Staff remain responsible for verifying AI-generated outputs and for all final decisions.

We use AI to support staff who respond to enquiries, manage information and deliver services. The public does not currently directly interact with Commission AI systems when dealing with the Commission.

Compliance and fraud detection Also appears in 9 other agencies AGD ATO CER DAFF DFAT DHAC OPC RAM SERVICESAUSTRALIA

We use AI-supported analytics to identify patterns, risks and trends that help inform regulatory oversight and compliance activities. AI does not determine compliance outcomes without human review.

We use AI to support internal corporate functions, including information management, drafting, summarising, analysis, communication, technology support and other productivity activities.

Public interaction and impact Also appears in 14 other agencies ABS ACCC AER AIC AIFS ALRC ARPANSA ASSEA BOM CCA DCCEEW GBRMPA NHFB WGEA

The public does not currently directly interact with Commission AI systems when dealing with the Commission. If this changes, we will update this statement.

As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying and managing potential negative impacts from AI use. This includes impacts on older people, aged care service recipients, representatives, providers, members of the public and Commission staff.

Ensuring safe and responsible use of AI

The Commission applies responsible AI principles to guide the design, adoption and use of AI. These principles support ethical practice, human oversight, accountability and transparency.

The Commission’s responsible AI principles are:

  • ethical and human-centred use: AI systems must align with our values, respect human dignity and support human judgment for ultimate decision making
  • clear accountability: every AI system must have an accountable owner who is responsible for its outcomes and compliance with relevant policies
  • risk and impact assessment: AI systems must be assessed before they are used, including consideration of risks, impacts and appropriate controls
  • reliability and security: AI systems must be fit for purpose, reliable, secure and suitable for its intended use
  • fairness, inclusion and accessibility: AI systems must be inclusive, accessible and fair. They must not involve or result in unfair discrimination against people, communities or groups
  • transparency and contestability: AI use must be transparent at a level that matches the risk, impact and public interest
  • human oversight and control: human oversight must be proportionate to the autonomy, sensitivity, risk and impact of the system
  • monitoring, review and continuous improvement: AI use must be reviewed over time, so controls remain effective as systems, risks and policy settings change.

The Commission supports these principles through governance and assurance processes that include:

  • an internal AI use case register to provide visibility of approved, proposed and exploratory AI use across the Commission
  • escalation pathways for AI concerns, incidents or emerging risks, including the ability to suspend, restrict or stop AI use if controls are not operating effectively.

The Commission will continue to use whole-of-government policies and develop Commission-specific policies and processes as required. This supports our commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks and protect against negative impacts.

The Commission’s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Officials. (Template language)

The AI Accountable Officials are accountable for implementing the APS AI Plan and Policy for the responsible use of AI within the Commission. They support responsible and confident adoption of AI through governance and risk management. (Template language)

The Commission’s Chief Data and Analytics Officer is appointed as the Chief AI Officer.

The Chief AI Officer leads AI transformation across the Commission by identifying opportunities, supporting adoption and driving cultural change.

How to contact us about our use of AI Also appears in 2 other agencies FFMA HEALTHDIRECT

If you have any questions about this statement or the Commission’s use of AI, you can contact the Commission by email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au.

Statement review and updates Also appears in 3 other agencies APRA ARPC DITRDCA

The Commission reviews this statement at least once a year, when making a significant change to its approach to AI, or when any new factor materially affects the accuracy of this statement.

Statement text © Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. substantive +4047

    Rewrites its statement: names Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, appoints a Chief AI Officer, says its AI strategy is now developed, and sets out responsible AI principles and governance mechanisms.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # AI Transparency Statement February 2025 This document is designed for online viewing. Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 # ACQSC[ Listen ](https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=5802&lang=en_au&readid=content&url=https://www.agedcarequality.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/ai-transparency-statement "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") \_\_ # AI Transparency Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) employuses Artificial Intelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically. The Commission complies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), in its role as whole-of-government coordinator on the use of AI by the Australian Public Service (APS), including: - Policy for the responsible use of AI in government - Standard for accountable officials - Standard for AI transparency statements - Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools - Australia's AI Ethics Principles This statement explains how we use and govern AI, the safeguards we apply, and how the public can contact us about our use of AI. We follow the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and related standards and guidance. ## Our stanceposition on AI The Commission applies the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). '](https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.html) definition of AI. ‘ _An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.'’_ For the purposes of this statement, AI includes generative AI, machine learning and other tools that meet the OECD definition of an AI system. It does not include rules-based automation or workflow tools that follow pre-set instructions and do not infer how to generate outputs from the inputs they receive. The Commission'’s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026The Commission has developed its [strategic position on AI adoption](https://agedcarequality.sharepoint.com/sites/DigitalGroupDTK/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FDigitalGroupDTK%2FShared%20Documents%2FDigital%2DData%2DStrategy%2D2026%2D2029%2Epdf&parent=%2Fsites%2FDigitalGroupDTK%2FShared%20Documents). This statement reflects our current approach and will be updated as our agency and our AI use evolve. ## Why we use AI The Commission is dedicacommitted to enhancimproving the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a safe and responsible and safe manner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities,way. We see AI as both an opportunity and a strategic enabler. Used appropriately, AI can improve our ability to protect older people, strengthen regulatory intelligence, support risk-based oversight and reduce administrative burden for staff. We while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support our work to protect and improve the safety, health, wellbeing and quality of life for people receiving aged care services. ## How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance withl use AI in a way that maintains public trust, regulatory integrity and human accountability. ## How we use AI The Commission has made Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat available to staff to support workplace productivity. Staff are expected to complete internal training before using approved AI tools. This training covers the foundations of safe and responsible AI use. The Commission uses AI in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and frameworks. This includes obligations relating to privacy, information security, records management, freedom of information, procurement, administrative decision-making, delegations, accessibility and the Commission’s aged care regulatory functions. We classify our AI use according to the DTA'’s [classification system: - Usage patterns: - Analytics for insights,](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) for AI use. The usage patterns and domains that apply to the Commission’s AI use are listed below. ## Usage patterns ### Analytics for insights We use AI to identify patterns, trends and insights. This includinges regulatory risk models, and - Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks - Dointelligence, risk analysis, reporting and modelling to support our work. ### Workplace productivity We use approved AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, to support routine workplace tasks. This may include summarising information, drafting content, and supporting research. ### Decision makins: - Compliance, - Corporate and enabling, and -g and administrative action Our AI tools are not approved to make decisions or take administrative action without human intervention. Staff may use approved AI tools to research, compare options, summarise evidence, identify risks, recommend wording or a course of action to support human decision making. Staff remain responsible for verifying AI-generated outputs and for all final decisions. ## Domains ### Service delivery. ## Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI applications do not impact the public, and members of tWe use AI to support staff who respond to enquiries, manage information and deliver services. The public does not currently directly interact with Commission AI systems when dealing with the Commission. ### Compliance and fraud detection We use AI-supported analytics to identify patterns, risks and trends that help inform regulatory oversight and compliance activities. AI does not determine compliance outcomes without human review. ### Corporate and enabling We use AI to support internal corporate functions, including information management, drafting, summarising, analysis, communication, technology support and other productivity activities. ## Public interaction and impact The public aredoes not required to interact with AI applications icurrently directly interact with Commission AI systems when dealings with the Commission. This transparency statementIf this changes, we will be updated if this changesstatement. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying anyd managing potential negative impacts from theAI use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. ## Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI - The Commission ensures that AI initiatives. This includes impacts on older people, aged care service recipients, representatives, providers, members of the public and Commission staff. ## Ensuring safe and responsible use of AI The Commission applies responsible AI principles to guide the design, adoption and use of AI. These principles support ethical practice, human oversight, accountability and transparency. The Commission’s responsible AI principles are: - **ethical and human-centred use:** AI systems must align with itsour values and are in the best interests of the public, including , respect human dignity and support human judgment for ultimate decision making - **clear accountability:** every AI system must have an accountable owner who is responsible for its outcomes and compliance withe recipients of aged clevant policies - **risk and impact assessment:** AI systems must be assessed before they are uservices. - The Commission applies DTA policiesd, including consideration of risks, impacts and appropriate controls - **reliability and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation,curity:** AI systems must be fit for purpose, reliable, secure and suitable for its intended use - **fairness, inclusion and accessibility:** AI systems must be inclusive, accessible and fair. They must not involve or regsulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliancet in unfair discrimination against people, communities or groups - **transparency and contestability:** AI use must be transparent at a level that matches the risk, impact and public interest - **human oversight and control:** human oversight must be proportionate to the autonomy, sensitivity, risk and impact of the system - **monitoring, review and continuous improvement:** AI use must be reviewed over time, so controls remain effective as systems, risks and policy settings change. ## AI governance The Commission supports these principles through governance and assurance processes that include: - asn it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission's Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leveragnternal AI use case register to provide visibility of approved, proposed and exploratory AI use across the Commission - escalation pathways for AI concerns, incidents or emerging risks, including the ability to suspend, restrict or stop AI use if controls are not operating effectively. The Commission will continue to use whole -of Australian G-government policies and develop additional, Commission -specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission's ongoings our commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, and protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology. ## Accountable. ## Accountable Officials The Commission’s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Officials. The AI Accountable Officials are accountable for implementing the APS AI Plan and Policy for the responsible use of AI within the Commission. They support responsible and confident adoption of AI through governance and risk management. ## Chief AI Officialer The Commission'’s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Officialsata and Analytics Officer is appointed as the Chief AI Officer. The Chief AI Officer leads AI transformation across the Commission by identifying opportunities, supporting adoption and driving cultural change. ## How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or the Commission'’s use of AI, you can contact the Commission as follows: - email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 2026by email at: [info@agedcarequality.gov.au](mailto:info@agedcarequality.gov.au). ## Statement review and updates The Commission reviews this statement at least once a year, when making a significant change to its approach to AI, or when any new factor materially affects the accuracy of this statement. Share this page
    a10c457
  2. noise -311

    Same statement text captured in a different layout, with PDF page headers dropped and Markdown headings and bullets added. The wording and commitments are unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 1 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 # ACQSC AI Transparency Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) employs Artificial Intelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically. The Commission complies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), in its role as whole-of-government coordinator on the use of AI by the Australian Public Service (APS), including: • - Policy for the responsible use of AI in government •- Standard for accountable officials •- Standard for AI transparency statements •- Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools •- Australia’'s AI Ethics Principles ## Our stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). ‘ 'An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’' The Commission’'s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026. ## Why we use AI The Commission is dedicated to enhancing the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a responsible and safe manner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities, while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support our work to protect and improve the safety, health, wellbeing and quality of life for people receiving aged care services. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 ## How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s 's classification system: • - Usage patterns: o - Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, and o - Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ • - Domains: o - Compliance, o - Corporate and enabling, and o - Service delivery. ## Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI applications do not impact the public, and members of the public are not required to interact with AI applications in dealings with the Commission. This transparency statement will be updated if this changes. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying any negative impacts from the use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. ## Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI • - The Commission ensures that AI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests of the public, including the recipients of aged care services. •- The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice.\ The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliance as it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission’'s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop additional, Commission specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission’'s ongoing commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 3 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology.\ ## Accountable Official The Commission’'s Chief Digital Information Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Officials.\ ## How to contact us about our use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or the Commission’'s use of AI, you can contact the Commission as follows:\ • - email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 2026
    36b4ad4
  3. substantive +1455

    Rewrites its statement to report an AI Policy approved in December 2025, discloses AI regulatory risk models, and names two AI accountable officials instead of the Chief Digital Officer.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 1 of 23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 2504/023/2025 The Commission’s6 ACQSC AI tTransparency s Statement The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) useemploys aArtificial iIntelligence (AI) safely, responsibly and ethically. WeThe Commission complyies with the standards published by the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) standards, in its role as whole-of-government coordinator on the use of AI by the Australian Public Service employees. The DTA is the AI whole of Australian Government coordinator. Their AI standards(APS), includeing: • Policy for the responsible use of AI in government • Standard for accountable officials • Standard for AI transparency statements • Interim guidance on government use of public generative AI tools • Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. Why we use AI We are committed to improv Our stance on AI The Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). ‘An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.’ The Commission’s AI Policy was approved on 10 December 2025. We are currently developing our strategic position on AI adoption. This transparency statement will be updated to reflect this strategy by 15 June 2026. Why we use AI The Commission is dedicated to enhancing the quality and efficiency of our services by introducing AI capabilities in a responsible and safe way. We are looking into AI opportunitimanner. The Commission is pursuing AI opportunities, while managing the risks, to take advantage of the benefits the technology provides to support our work into protecting and improve the safety, health and, wellbeing ofand quality of life for people receiving aged care. We want to benefit from the technology it provides. But we will also manage its risks. How we use AI At the moment we have limited use of services. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 2 of 3 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 04/03/2026 How we use AI The Commission currently has limited use of AI, listed here in accordance with the DTA’s classification system: • Usage patterns: o Analytics for insights, including regulatory risk models, and o Workplace productivity for automation of routine tasks\ • Domains: o Compliance, o Corporate and enabling, and o Service delivery. Public Interaction and impact All Commission decisions are made by, and communicated through, Commission staff. Commission AI, and no use of automated decision-making. In pplications do not impact the public, and members of the public are not required to interact with AI applications in dealinegs with the DTA’s classification system, how we use AI (our usage patterns) and the aCommission. This transparency statement will be updated if this changes. As AI becomes more widely used, the Commission is committed to identifying any negative impacts from the use of AI and protecting the public and aged care service recipients. The Commission will continue to engage with AI in a responsible way and be transparent about its use of AI. Ensuring Safe and Responsible use of AI • The Commission ensureas that we use it in (domains) include: • usage patterns: o runnAI initiatives align with its values and are in the best interests of the public, including the recipients of aged care services. • The Commission applies DTA policies and use AI ing analytics for insights o improving workplace productivity by automating everyday tasks • domains: o compliance o corporate and enabling o service deliveryccordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice.\ The Commission is in the process of developing an AI strategy which will define the approach to Data Governance, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity Compliance as it pertains to the use of AI. This will also align with the Commission’s Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will leverage whole of Australian Government policies and develop additional, Commission specific, policies and processes as required. This will support the Commission’s ongoing commitment to maintain robust governance frameworks, protect against negative impacts and ensure AI system effectiveness. Commission policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. The Commission will also develop and deploy AI fundamentals guidance material for all staff. AI Transparency Statement February 2025 Page 23 of 23 This document is designed for online viewing.\ Printed copies, although permitted, are deemed\ uncontrolled from 2504/023/2025 Public interaction and impact We do not use AI applications that affect the public or to interact with them. We will update this transparency statement if this changes. When AI is used more widely, we will identify any negative effects from using it, and protect the public and people receiving aged care. We will continue to work with AI in a responsible way and be open and honest about it. Making sure we use AI safely and responsibly • We make sure that AI projects are consistent with our values and are in the best interests of the public. This includes people receiving aged care. • We apply DTA policies and use AI in line with legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice. We are developing an AI strategy which will define how we use AI alongside data governance, data privacy and cybersecurity compliance. It will also follow our Regulatory Strategy and Corporate Plan. We will use whole of Australian Government policies and develop other policies and processes specific to the Commission. This will support us to: • maintain strong governance frameworks • protect against negative impacts • make sure AI systems are effective. Our policies apply to all employees including contractors and consultants. We will also develop and educate all staff with AI basics resources. We will update this transparency statement at least once a year, or as we develop and change how we use AI, our6 This transparency statement will be updated at least once a year, or as the Commission develops and evolves AI usage, policies and technology.\ Accountable oOfficial The Commission’s Chief Digital Officer isInformation Officer and Director of AI are appointed as the AI Accountable Official. Cs.\ How to contact us about how weour use of AI If you have any questions about this statement or ourthe Commission’s use of AI, you can contact the Commission at: s follows:\ • email at: info@agedcarequality.gov.au This statement was last updated February 20256
    2ab0243
  4. first tracked +3491

    First tracked version.

    9532836