APS AI Tracker

NOPSEMA

National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority

View the original ↗

Tracked since 26 Feb 2026 · 1 change of substance across 2 captures · last changed 21 Apr 2026

The story so far

How to read this

  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed; when National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority first published it is not recorded.

  2. substantive NOPSEMA rewrites its statement, naming the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official and Microsoft Copilot as a tool, while dropping its annual review commitment.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Chief Information Officer named as Accountable Official for AI oversight and risk management
    • Removed: commitment to review the statement annually or on significant change
    • Names Microsoft Copilot as a current tool, managed under existing ICT, security and risk frameworks
    • Adds a risk-based approach with stronger controls for higher-risk uses
    • Training commitment weakened from all staff receiving training to all staff having access to training
    • Exclusion of AI from compliance, auditing and decision-making narrowed to 'regulatory service delivery'
    • Staff training: mandatory → available
    • Commitment dropped (will): Statement reviewed annually, or whenever significant changes occur in our approach to AI
    • Named tool added: Microsoft Copilot
    • New commitment (will): Applying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight
    • Safeguard added: privacy or security controls
    • Safeguard added: risk assessment
    • Accountable official: not mentioned → designated
    • Monitoring and protection measures added
    • Review cadence: annual and on change → not stated
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

NOPSEMA says it uses AI only for internal corporate and enabling functions — meeting transcription, document summarisation, virtual assistants and data analysis — with a human in the loop so all decisions are made by staff. It has no public-facing or regulatory AI use, oversees AI through existing governance with the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official, and is developing an internal AI usage policy. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Workplace productivity
  • Analytics for insights
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft Copilot

Public-facing AI: none

Safeguards named: human review of outputs, staff training, an acceptable-use policy, risk assessment, privacy or security controls

Against the Standard 7/8

  • Intentions behind AI use
  • Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Public-facing use addressed
  • Monitoring and protection measures
  • Compliance with the policy
  • Compliance with legislation
  • Date last updated
  • Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
not stated
Says it was last updated
21 Apr 2026
Last change we observed
21 Apr 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • human oversightAI not used in compliance, auditing or decision-making without a human-in-the-loop; final decisions made by a human
  • willWill update this statement if AI usage extends or public-facing AI capabilities are implemented
  • willAll staff will receive training on the responsible use of AI
  • willDeveloping an internal AI usage policy conforming to government guidelines and best practices
  • willApplying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight

The statement

How to read this

NOPSEMA is exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve workplace productivity, while ensuring that people remain accountable for all decisions. We are committed to using AI in a safe, secure and ethical manner.

NOPSEMA currently uses AI to support internal corporate and enabling functions only.

  • meeting transcription and document summarisation
  • virtual assistants to streamline workflows and improve efficiency
  • data analysis to assist with interpreting structured and unstructured information.

NOPSEMA does not use AI in regulatory service delivery, including compliance, auditing or decision-making. Where AI is used, a human-in-the-loop approach applies. AI may assist with tasks, but all decisions and actions are made by NOPSEMA staff.

If NOPSEMA expands its use of AI, or introduces any public-facing AI capability, this statement will be updated to describe:

  • the purpose and intended outcomes of the AI use
  • any direct interactions the public may have with AI systems
  • how AI systems are monitored, evaluated and reviewed
  • compliance with relevant legislation, policies and regulatory obligations
  • how risks and potential negative impacts are identified and mitigated.

NOPSEMA aligns with the Australian Policy for the responsible use of AI in government and is committed to transparent and responsible AI use.

Oversight of AI at NOPSEMA is provided through existing governance arrangements, with the Chief Information Officer acting as the Accountable Official responsible for AI oversight and risk management.

NOPSEMA's approach to AI governance includes:

  • applying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight
  • developing an internal AI usage policy aligned with whole-of-government requirements
  • managing current AI tools, such as Microsoft Copilot, through existing ICT, information security and risk management frameworks
  • providing all staff with access to training on the responsible and ethical use of AI.

For any inquiries regarding this statement on NOPSEMA's use of AI, please contact ai@nopsema.gov.au.

Statement text © National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. substantive+221

    NOPSEMA rewrites its statement, naming the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official and Microsoft Copilot as a tool, while dropping its annual review commitment.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    Print ### Menu # AI transparency statement At NOPSEMA, we are excited to is exploreing the potentialuse of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhancimprove workplace productivity in a way that keeps humans at the centre of our, while ensuring that people remain accountable for all decision makings. We are pledgcommitted to dousing thisAI in a safe, secure, and ethical fashionmanner. ### Current AI usage Our AI usage is focused on enhancinguse of AI NOPSEMA currently uses AI to support internal corporate and enabling functions by way of AI tools such aonly. This includes: - meeting transcription and automated document summarisation - virtual assistants, thato streamline workflows and improve efficiency - deep data analysis, that helps us understand botho assist with interpreting structured and unstructured materialinformation. NOPSEMA does not currently use AI in service delivery - specifically AI is not used use AI in regulatory service delivery, including compliance, auditing or decision-making without having. Where AI is used, a human-in-the-loop. This means that while AI technologies may be used to assist in various tasks, any fina approach applies. AI may assist with tasks, but all decisions orand actions are made by a humanNOPSEMA staff. ### Future AI adoption Should we decide to extend our AI usage, or implementuse of AI If NOPSEMA expands its use of AI, or introduces any public -facing AI capabilities, we will update this statement to reflect this, includingy, this statement will be updated to describe: - ourthe purpose and objectives behind adopting AIintended outcomes of the AI use - any direct interactions the public may have with AI systems - measures tohow AI systems are monitor anded, evaluate the effectiveness of AI systemsd and reviewed - compliance with relevant legislation, policies and regulations - efforts to mitigateory obligations - how risks anyd potential negative impacts of AIare identified and mitigated. ### Governance and policy NOPSEMA is aligned tos with the [Australian Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and we areis committed to keeping our stakeholders informed about our AI initiatives. - We are developing an internal AI usage policy that conforms to government guidelines and best practices. - This AI transparency statement will be reviewed annually, or whenever significant changes occur in our approach to AI. - All staff will receive training on the responsible use of AI. ### Contact informationtransparent and responsible AI use. Oversight of AI at NOPSEMA is provided through existing governance arrangements, with the Chief Information Officer acting as the Accountable Official responsible for AI oversight and risk management. NOPSEMA's approach to AI governance includes: - applying a risk-based approach, with higher-risk uses subject to stronger controls and oversight - developing an internal AI usage policy aligned with whole-of-government requirements - managing current AI tools, such as Microsoft Copilot, through existing ICT, information security and risk management frameworks - providing all staff with access to training on the responsible and ethical use of AI. For any inquiries regarding this statement, or our AI initiativesn NOPSEMA's use of AI, please contact [ai@nopsema.gov.au.](mailto:ai@nopsema.gov.au).
    b5e684a
  2. first tracked+2095

    First tracked revision.

    c6ef5b8