APS AI Tracker

PC

Productivity Commission

View the original ↗redirects to www.pc.gov.au

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 3 captures · last changed 2 Apr 2026

The story so far

How to read this

  1. Tracking begins. The statement itself says it was first published 24 Feb 2025.

  2. substantive Discloses a licensed ChatGPT rollout to research staff, makes AI training mandatory before tool access, tightens disclosure rules and adds a version history.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • New tool disclosed: licensed ChatGPT for a number of staff, mainly in research areas
    • Training in appropriate AI use now a prerequisite for tool access
    • Users must describe AI purposes and confirm review of outputs when submitting work for approval
    • Version history table added; statement updated 2 April 2026 to align with updated DTA policy
    • Commitment retained: no AI where the public directly interacts or is significantly impacted without a human
    • Named tool added: ChatGPT
    • New commitment (will): Completion of AI training is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC
    • Safeguard added: staff training
    • Staff training: not mentioned → mandatory
    • Stated last-updated date: — → 2026-03-31
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The Productivity Commission says it uses AI for analytics and workplace productivity across scientific, corporate and policy/legal domains, including Microsoft 365 Copilot for all staff and licensed ChatGPT for some researchers, under an internal AI policy applying to Commissioners, staff and contractors. It undertakes not to use AI where the public directly interacts with or is significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary, and requires training before access to AI tools. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Scientific
  • Corporate and enabling
  • Policy and legal

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot, ChatGPT

Public-facing AI: nonecommits to a human intermediary

Safeguards named: human review of outputs, an acceptable-use policy, privacy or security controls, staff training

Against the Standard 8/8

  • Intentions behind AI use
  • Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Public-facing use addressed
  • Monitoring and protection measures
  • Compliance with the policy
  • Compliance with legislation
  • Date last updated
  • Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Assistant Commissioner, Corporate Group and Director, Digital Technologies (joint Accountable Officials)
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
31 Mar 2026
Last change we observed
2 Apr 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • will notDo not propose using AI where public directly interacts with or is significantly impacted without human intermediary
  • will notOnly authorised AI tools may be introduced and used in our Data Technology environment
  • human oversightUsers must be open and transparent about AI use and carefully review all outputs
  • willWill only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies
  • willReview and update this statement if approach changes significantly, and at least every twelve months
  • willInternal AI policy will be reviewed and updated to remain consistent with DTA policy and guidance
  • willCompletion of AI training is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statementAlso appears in 18 other agenciesAASBACIARAFPAFSAARPCAUASBBOMDFATDSSDVAEDUCATIONFINANCEHSRANAANLAPSRSIATEQSA

This statement is published in accordance with requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government __.

Consistent with the DTA policy we have applied the following definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD):Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBAUASB

“An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”Also appears in 16 other agenciesAASBACCCACMAACQSCAERAFSAAICAIFSARPANSAARTASSEAAUASBAUSTRADEBOMCERFWC

Our approach to AI adoption and useAlso appears in 3 other agenciesAASBAPSCAUASB

We are adopting and using AI in a way that enhances and supports our work while ensuring its safe, ethical, and responsible use. We are doing so within existing frameworks and legislation relevant to government’s use of AI including those relating to:

  • the APS Values and Code of Conduct.

In accordance with the DTA Classification system for AI Use __we may use AI as follows:Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBAUASB

  • Analytics for insights – to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting tools.Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBAUASB
  • Workplace Productivity – to automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication.Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBAUASB
  • Scientific – to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes, and enhance monitoring functions.
  • Corporate and enabling – to support corporate functions by automating processes, optimising resource allocation, and improving operational efficiency.
  • Policy and legal – to analyse policies and legal documents to provide advice and assurance on their impact and to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws.

We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or intervention.Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBAUASB

In 2024 we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We continue to make this available to all staff. We have also made a licensed version of ChatGPT available to a number of staff, primarily in research focussed areas.

We maintain an internal policy on the use of AI which applies to all Commissioners, staff, and contractors. It is consistent with, and supports, the provisions of DTA policy and guidance and will be reviewed and updated to ensure it remains so.

The policy specifies that only authorised AI tools may be introduced and used in our Data Technology (DT) environment. It also requires all AI users to be open and transparent about their use of AI. When submitting work for review or approval, users must, where applicable, describe the purpose(s) for which AI tools were used and confirm that all AI generated outputs relied upon have been carefully reviewed for accuracy, quality and appropriateness.

Completion of training in the appropriate use of AI is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC.

We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies.

The Assistant Commissioner, Corporate Group and the Director, Digital Technologies are designated as joint Accountable Officials.

This transparency statement will be reviewed and updated if our approach to the use of AI changes significantly, and at least every twelve months.

24 February 2025 Initial version

31 March 2026 Review and amended to align with updated DTA policy

If you have any questions about this statement please contact ai@pc.gov.au.

Statement text © Productivity Commission, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. substantive+548

    Discloses a licensed ChatGPT rollout to research staff, makes AI training mandatory before tool access, tightens disclosure rules and adds a version history.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement ReleasUpdated 024 / 024 / 20256 This statement is published in accordance with requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [_Policy for responsible use of AI in government_ \_\_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Consistent with the DTA policy we have applied the following definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): > “An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.” ## Our approach to AI adoption and use We are adopting and using AI in a way that enhances and supports our work while ensuring its safe, ethical, and responsible use. We are doing so within existing frameworks and legislation relevant to government’s use of AI including those relating to: - the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct - data governance - privacy - cyber security - the APS Values and Code of Conduct. ## How we use AI In accordance with the [_DTA Classification system for AI Use_ \_\_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)we may use AI as follows: ### Usage patterns - **Analytics for insights** – to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting tools. - **Workplace Productivity** – to automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication. ### Domains - **Scientific** – to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes, and enhance monitoring functions. - **Corporate and enabling** – to support corporate functions by automating processes, optimising resource allocation, and improving operational efficiency. - **Policy and legal** – to analyse policies and legal documents to provide advice and assurance on their impact and to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or intervention. In 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We continue to make this available to all staff. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or interventionhave also made a licensed version of ChatGPT available to a number of staff, primarily in research focussed areas. ## Governance processes We maintain an internal policy on the use of AI which applies to all Commissioners, staff, and contractors. It is consistent with, and supports, the provisions of DTA policy and guidance and will be reviewed and updated to ensure it remains so. The policy specifies that only authorised AI tools may be introduced and used in our Data Technology (DT) environment. It also requires all AI users to be open and transparent about their use of AI and to carefully review all outputs for accuracy and quality. When submitting work for review or approval, users must, where applicable, describe the purpose(s) for which AI tools were used and confirm that all AI generated outputs relied upon have been carefully reviewed for accuracy, quality and appropriateness. Completion of training in the appropriate use of AI is a prerequisite for access to AI tools used in the PC. ## Compliance We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies. ### Accountable officials The Assistant Commissioner, Corporate Group and the Director, Digital Technologies are designated as joint Accountable Officials. ### Transparency statement This transparency statement will be reviewed and updated if our approach to the use of AI changes significantly, and at least every twelve months. ## Version history **Date********Note****** 24 February 2025 Initial version 31 March 2026 Review and amended to align with updated DTA policy ## Contact us If you have any questions about this statement please contact [ai@pc.gov.au](mailto:ai@pc.gov.au).
    98e91b7
  2. scrape noise-95

    Only a breadcrumb navigation trail dropped from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    1. [Home](https://www.pc.gov.au/) \_\_ 1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement # Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement Released 24 / 02 / 2025 This statement is published in accordance with requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [_Policy for responsible use of AI in government_ \_\_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Consistent with the DTA policy we have applied the following definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): > “An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.” ## Our approach to AI adoption and use We are adopting and using AI in a way that enhances and supports our work while ensuring its safe, ethical, and responsible use. We are doing so within existing frameworks and legislation relevant to government’s use of AI including those relating to: - the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct - data governance - privacy - cyber security. ## How we use AI In accordance with the [_DTA Classification system for AI Use_ \_\_](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification)we may use AI as follows: ### Usage patterns - **Analytics for insights** – to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting tools. - **Workplace Productivity** – to automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication. ### Domains - **Scientific** – to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes, and enhance monitoring functions. - **Corporate and enabling** – to support corporate functions by automating processes, optimising resource allocation, and improving operational efficiency. - **Policy and legal** – to analyse policies and legal documents to provide advice and assurance on their impact and to support policy development that is consistent with existing laws. In 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We continue to make this available to staff. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it without a human intermediary or intervention. ## Governance processes We maintain an internal policy on the use of AI which applies to all Commissioners, staff, and contractors. It is consistent with, and supports, the provisions of DTA policy and guidance and will be reviewed and updated to ensure it remains so. The policy specifies that only authorised AI tools may be introduced and used in our Data Technology (DT) environment. It also requires all users to be open and transparent about their use of AI and to carefully review all outputs for accuracy and quality. ## Compliance We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies. ### Accountable officials The Assistant Commissioner, Corporate Group and the Director, Digital Technologies are designated as joint Accountable Officials. ### Transparency statement This transparency statement will be reviewed and updated if our approach to the use of AI changes significantly, and at least every twelve months. ## Contact us If you have any questions about this statement please contact [ai@pc.gov.au](mailto:ai@pc.gov.au).
    9226d49
  3. first tracked+3671

    First tracked revision.

    07278a5