AIC

Australian Institute of Criminology

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 2 versions · last changed 26 May 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement says it was first published 28 Feb 2025.

  2. substantive Moves the deadline for all staff to complete the APS Academy's AI in Government Fundamentals course from 31 May 2025 to 30 June 2026.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Staff AI training deadline moved from 31 May 2025 to 30 June 2026
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The AIC uses AI in a restricted, case-by-case way in criminological research (for example, supervised machine learning for prediction models) and for staff productivity, such as generating library abstracts and writing and debugging code. It governs this through a Deputy Director as accountable official, mandatory staff training, ethics committee approval for AI research, a ban on uploading data to third-party AI tools, and ongoing review of its policies. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Scientific
  • Corporate and enabling

Public-facing AI: none commits to a human intermediary

Safeguards named: staff training, an acceptable-use policy, privacy or security controls, risk assessment

The Standard’s eight elements 8 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Deputy Director
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
version 1

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
other
Says it was last updated
26 May 2026
Last change we saw
26 May 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • will not Staff using AI for research must not export or upload data to any third-party AI application
  • will not Does not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted
  • human oversight Staff will seek human research ethics committee approval before undertaking research applying AI
  • will Staff use of AI in research restricted and reviewed case by case
  • will All staff required to complete APS Academy AI in Government Fundamentals by 30 June 2026
  • will Will review internal AI policies and governance on an ongoing basis to remain fit for purpose
  • will Only uses AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies

The statement

How to read this

The policy for the responsible use of AI in government provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to accountable officials, and transparency statements. It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page outlines the AIC’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI in its criminological research, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. (Template language)

The AIC applies the definition of artificial intelligence provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD):

An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Also appears in 17 other agencies AASB ACCC ACMA ACQSC AER AFSA AIFS ARPANSA ART ASSEA AUASB AUSTRADE BOM CER FWC IPA PC

Agencies must designate accountability for implementing the policy for responsible use of AI in government to accountable official(s). (Template language)

The responsibilities of the accountable officials are to: (Template language)

  • be accountable for implementation of the policy within their agencies
  • notify the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) where the agency has identified a new high-risk use case by emailing ai@dta.gov.au. This information will be used by the DTA to build visibility and inform the development of further risk mitigation approaches
  • be a contact point for whole-of-government AI coordination
  • engage in whole-of-government AI forums and processes
  • keep up-to-date with changing requirements as they evolve over time.

The accountable official for the AIC is the Deputy Director. (Template language)

Use of artificial intelligence by the AIC

The AIC has published a policy for use of generative AI in projects funded by the Criminology Research Grants program. This permits grantees to use AI for research purposes, while maintaining ethical standards, transparency and ensuring data protection.

Use of AI in research by AIC staff is currently restricted and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For example, supervised machine learning algorithms have been used in a small number of studies undertaken by the AIC to generate prediction models.

In using AI for research purposes, AIC staff are not permitted to export or upload data to any third-party AI application.

Prior to undertaking research that involves applying AI, AIC staff will seek approval from a human research ethics committee.

AI is used to improve productivity of staff by:

  • Generating abstracts from publicly available and open-source non-commercial publications for use by the library.
  • Generating and debugging code used in data analysis.

All AIC staff are required to complete the Australian Public Service Academy’s AI in Government Fundamentals course by 30 June 2026.

Public interaction and impact Also appears in 14 other agencies ABS ACCC ACQSC AER AIFS ALRC ARPANSA ASSEA BOM CCA DCCEEW GBRMPA NHFB WGEA

The AIC does not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it.

The AIC will review on an ongoing basis the internal policies and governance approaches to AI to ensure they remain fit for purpose.

The AIC only uses AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies.

Policy for the responsible use of AI in government Also appears in 4 other agencies ADHA AIFS ASSEA CER

The AIC complies with all mandatory requirements of the policy.

The accountable official was appointed and notified to the DTA on 21 February 2025. (Template language)

The AI transparency statement was first published to this website on 28 February 2025.

For questions about this statement or for further information on the AIC’s use of AI, please contact frontdesk@aic.gov.au.

Statement text © Australian Institute of Criminology. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. substantive +1

    Moves the deadline for all staff to complete the APS Academy's AI in Government Fundamentals course from 31 May 2025 to 30 June 2026.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to accountable officials, and transparency statements. It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page outlines the AIC’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI in its criminological research, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. ### Defining artificial intelligence The AIC applies the definition of artificial intelligence provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): > [An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.](https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/03/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_3c815e51/623da898-en.pdf) ### Accountable officials Agencies must designate accountability for implementing the policy for responsible use of AI in government to accountable official(s). The responsibilities of the accountable officials are to: - be accountable for implementation of the [policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) within their agencies - notify the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) where the agency has identified a new high-risk use case by emailing [ai@dta.gov.au](mailto:ai@dta.gov.au). This information will be used by the DTA to build visibility and inform the development of further risk mitigation approaches - be a contact point for whole-of-government AI coordination - engage in whole-of-government AI forums and processes - keep up-to-date with changing requirements as they evolve over time. The accountable official for the AIC is the Deputy Director. ### Use of artificial intelligence by the AIC #### Use in research The AIC has published a [policy for use of generative AI in projects funded by the Criminology Research Grants program](https://www.aic.gov.au/about-us/policy-use-generative-artificial-intelligence-projects-funded-criminology-research-grant-program). This permits grantees to use AI for research purposes, while maintaining ethical standards, transparency and ensuring data protection. Use of AI in research by AIC staff is currently restricted and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For example, supervised machine learning algorithms have been used in a small number of studies undertaken by the AIC to generate prediction models. In using AI for research purposes, AIC staff are not permitted to export or upload data to any third-party AI application. Prior to undertaking research that involves applying AI, AIC staff will seek approval from a human research ethics committee. #### Other uses of AI AI is used to improve productivity of staff by: - Generating abstracts from publicly available and open-source non-commercial publications for use by the library. - Generating and debugging code used in data analysis. ### Staff training All AIC staff are required to complete the Australian Public Service Academy’s _AI in Government Fundamentals_ course by 31 May0 June 20256. ### Public interaction and impact The AIC does not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it. ### Monitoring The AIC will review on an ongoing basis the internal policies and governance approaches to AI to ensure they remain fit for purpose. ### Compliance The AIC only uses AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies. #### Policy for the responsible use of AI in government The AIC complies with all mandatory requirements of the policy. #### Accountable official The accountable official was appointed and notified to the DTA on 21 February 2025. #### AI transparency statement The AI transparency statement was first published to this website on 28 February 2025. #### AI contact For questions about this statement or for further information on the AIC’s use of AI, please contact [frontdesk@aic.gov.au](mailto:frontdesk@aic.gov.au).
    5c0c4cb
  2. first tracked +4612

    First tracked version.

    b7e2a3d