APS AI Tracker

NIAA

National Indigenous Australians Agency

View the original ↗redirects to www.niaa.gov.au

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 4 captures · last changed 27 Mar 2026

The story so far

How to read this

  1. Tracking begins. The statement itself says it was first published 27 Mar 2026.

  2. substantive NIAA replaces its 2025 statement with a 2026 rewrite aligned to policy v2.0, naming the CIO as Accountable Official and adding Indigenous data sovereignty commitments.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Names the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official
    • Removed: commitment that AI is not used where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted without a human intermediary
    • Adds commitment that AI is not used for decision-making and all outputs are verified by authorised staff
    • Aligns with Policy v2.0, Australia's AI Ethics Principles and the National AI Assurance Framework
    • Adds Indigenous Data Sovereignty commitment via the Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data
    • Names Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for drafting correspondence and summarising meetings
    • Commits to an internal AI use case register, DTA impact assessments and reporting high-risk uses to the DTA
    • Mandates APS Academy 'AI in Government Fundamentals' training in place of internal training
    • Adds ai@, privacy@ and media@niaa.gov.au contacts, replacing the generic contact-us link
    • Publication date now 27 March 2026; annual review retained
    • Removed: PM&C ICT/AI policy precedence clause and MoU governance detail
    • Removed: mention of a possible AI trial with PM&C under the Data and Digital Government Strategy
    • Commitment dropped (will not): Has not authorised AI the public directly interacts with or is significantly impacted by without human intermediary
    • Commitment dropped (will): Abide by PM&C ICT and AI policies, which take precedence over this statement
    • Legislative compliance statement removed
    • Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
    • Safeguard dropped: governance body
    • New commitment (human oversight): All AI-generated outputs reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member
    • New commitment (will not): Does not use AI for decision-making
    • New commitment (will): Establish risk assessment approach aligned to the DTA AI Impact Assessment
    • New commitment (will): Maintain an internal AI Use Case Register and report high-risk AI applications to the DTA
    • Safeguard added: human review of outputs
    • Safeguard added: incident or concern reporting
    • Safeguard added: privacy or security controls
    • Safeguard added: risk assessment
    • Safeguard added: use case register
    • AI use-case register: not mentioned → planned
    • Accountable official: not mentioned → designated
    • Public-facing AI use: none → not addressed
    • Policy version referenced: v1 → v2
    • Stated first-published date: 2025-02-19 → 2026-03-27
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

NIAA says it uses AI only for workplace productivity — Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for drafting and meeting summaries — with no AI decision-making and all outputs verified by authorised staff. Governance sits with the Chief Information Officer as Accountable Official, with a planned AI use case register, DTA-aligned impact assessments, mandatory APS Academy AI training and an Indigenous Data Sovereignty framing. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Workplace productivity
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot

Public-facing AI: not addressed

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, staff training, use-case register, incident or concern reporting, privacy or security controls

Against the Standard 5/8

  • Intentions behind AI use
  • Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Public-facing use addressed
  • Monitoring and protection measures
  • Compliance with the policy
  • Compliance with legislation
  • Date last updated
  • Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
planned
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
no date given
Last change we observed
27 Mar 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes

Commitments

  • will notDoes not use AI for decision-making
  • human oversightAll AI-generated outputs reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member
  • willReview statement annually, or on significant change to approach or other new factor
  • willAll staff required to complete internal AI fundamentals training
  • willMaintain an internal AI Use Case Register and report high-risk AI applications to the DTA
  • willEstablish risk assessment approach aligned to the DTA AI Impact Assessment

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026

The National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is committed to the safe, ethical, and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The NIAA will leverage AI to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples while ensuring alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (v2.0).

The NIAA’s approach is guided by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles.

The NIAA supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty and applies the Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data to ensure that any use of AI strengthens community control, supports Closing the Gap priorities, and protects cultural rights through safe stewardship of Indigenous data.

The NIAA classifies its AI usage according to the DTA Classification System. Based on this classification, the NIAA currently uses AI for workplace productivity. The NIAA has deployed enterprise tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat) for administrative efficiency, including drafting correspondence and summarising meetings. This is governed under the DTA Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government and aligned with the National Framework for the Assurance of Artificial Intelligence in Government.

The NIAA adopts human oversight policy for AI use in the Agency. The NIAA does not use AI for decision-making. All AI-generated outputs are reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member.

Staff training and capability

To ensure the responsible use of technology, the NIAA mandates that all staff complete AI literacy and ethics training as a core requirement under the APS AI Plan 2025.

All NIAA staff will complete the AI in Government Fundamentals course via the APS Academy. This training covers ethical implications, security risks, and output verification.

Governance, reporting, and compliance

To maintain public trust and meet Commonwealth mandatory requirements, the NIAA has implemented the following governance framework and will work on these measures:

  • Accountable Official: The NIAA Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring agency-wide compliance with AI policies.
  • Risk Management: The NIAA will establish an assessment approach aligned to the DTA AI Impact Assessment to identify privacy, security, and cultural safety risks for AI use cases.
  • Mandatory Reporting: The NIAA will maintain an internal AI Use Case Register. The NIAA will formally notify the DTA of transparency compliance and report any high-risk AI applications as required via the DTA Reporting Portal.
  • Technical Standards: The NIAA systems are integrated within PROTECTED ICT environment, managed in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C).

The NIAA reviews this statement annually. This statement was published on 27 March 2026 and will be reviewed annually, or when:

  • If there is a notable change to the NIAA’s approach to AI, or
  • Any Commonwealth and/or DTA measures are introduced which will impact this statement.

We encourage feedback from the public regarding our use of these technologies. You can contact us on the following email addresses:

Statement text © National Indigenous Australians Agency, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. links only0
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026 [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) [ Listen ](https://app-asoc.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=7448&lang=en_au&readid=page-content__content&url=https://www.niaa.gov.au/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement-2026 "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") ## **Purpose** The National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is committed to the safe, ethical, and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The NIAA will leverage AI to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples while ensuring alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The NIAA’s approach is guided by [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles). The NIAA supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty and applies the [Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data](https://www.niaa.gov.au/our-work/data-evaluation-and-research/framework-governance-indigenous-data-gid) to ensure that any use of AI strengthens community control, supports Closing the Gap priorities, and protects cultural rights through safe stewardship of Indigenous data. ## **How NIAA uses AI** The NIAA classifies its AI usage according to the [DTA Classification System](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Based on this classification, the NIAA currently uses AI for workplace productivity. The NIAA has deployed enterprise tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat) for administrative efficiency, including drafting correspondence and summarising meetings. This is governed under the DTA Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government and aligned with the [National Framework for the Assurance of Artificial Intelligence in Government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). The NIAA adopts human oversight policy for AI use in the Agency. The NIAA does not use AI for decision-making. All AI-generated outputs are reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member. ## **Staff training and capability** To ensure the responsible use of technology, the NIAA mandates that all staff complete AI literacy and ethics training as a core requirement under the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). All NIAA staff will complete the [AI in Government Fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-fundamentals) course via the APS Academy. This training covers ethical implications, security risks, and output verification. ## **Governance, reporting, and compliance** To maintain public trust and meet Commonwealth mandatory requirements, the NIAA has implemented the following governance framework and will work on these measures: 1. **Accountable Official:** The NIAA Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring agency-wide compliance with [AI policies](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability). 1. **Risk Management:** The NIAA will establish an assessment approach aligned to the [DTA AI Impact Assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) to identify privacy, security, and cultural safety risks for AI use cases. 1. **Mandatory Reporting:** The NIAA will maintain an internal AI Use Case Register. The NIAA will formally notify the DTA of transparency compliance and report any high-risk AI applications as required via the DTA Reporting Portal. 1. **Technical Standards:** The NIAA systems are integrated within PROTECTED ICT environment, managed in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). ## **Transparency and feedback** The NIAA reviews this statement annually. This statement was published on 27 March 2026 and will be reviewed annually, or when: 1. If there is a notable change to the NIAA’s approach to AI, or 1. Any Commonwealth and/or DTA measures are introduced which will impact this statement. We encourage feedback from the public regarding our use of these technologies. You can contact us on the following email addresses: - **General enquiries:** [ai@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22ai@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Privacy matters:** [privacy@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22privacy@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Media enquiries:** [media@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22media@niaa.gov.au%22).
    1f74606
  2. substantive-142

    NIAA replaces its 2025 statement with a 2026 rewrite aligned to policy v2.0, naming the CIO as Accountable Official and adding Indigenous data sovereignty commitments.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement 2026 [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) [ Listen ](https://app-as.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=7448&lang=en_au&readid=page-content__content&url=https://www.niaa.gov.au/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement-2026 "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") ## **Purpose** The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statementNational Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is committed to the safe, ethical, and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The NIAA will leverage AI to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples while ensuring alignment with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (v2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy). The NIAA’s approach is guided by [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.digitalindustry.gov.au/poublicy/ai/transparency-statements). It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page discusses NIAA’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI to enhance public services for Indigenous Australians, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. ## NIAA approach to AI adoption and use ### Opportunities and risks The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) describes a familyations/australias-ai-ethics-principles). The NIAA supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty and applies the [Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data](https://www.niaa.gov.au/our-work/data-evaluation-and-research/framework-governance-indigenous-data-gid) to ensure that any use of AI strengthens community control, supports Closing the Gap priorities, and protects cultural rights through safe stewardship of Indigenous data. ## **How NIAA uses AI** The NIAA classifies its AI usage according to the [DTA Classification System](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Based ofn technologies that brings together computing power, scalability, networking, connected devices and interfaces, and data. AI technologies and systems built on these technologies can be programmed to perform specific tasks such as reasoning, planning, natural language processhis classification, the NIAA currently uses AI for workplace productivity. The NIAA has deployed enterprise tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat) for administrative efficiency, including drafting, computer vision, audio processing, interaction, prediction and more. AI technologies can operate with varying levels of autonomy. These potential efficiencies present opportunities for improved outcomes for service delivery, they also present risks. NIAA continues to review its internal policies to ensure our: 1. AI use is appropriately governed 1. engagement with AI is confident, culturally safe and responsible 1. stakeholders have trust in our use of AI 1. risks are identified and addressed 1. access and usage is monitored. ### How NIAA uses AI At this time NIAA has not authorised the use of AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, withorrespondence and summarising meetings. This is governed under the DTA Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government and aligned with the [National Framework for the Assurance of Artificial Intelligence in Government](https://www.finance.gov.au/government/public-data/data-and-digital-ministers-meeting/national-framework-assurance-artificial-intelligence-government). The NIAA adopts human oversight policy for AI use in the Agency. The NIAA does not use AI for decision-making. All AI-generated outputs a human intermediary or intervention. In September 2024 NIAA personnel gained access to a generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. Thre reviewed and verified by an appropriately authorised NIAA staff member. ## **Staff training and capability** To ensure the responsible usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. All staff are required to complete internal AI fundamentals training. NIAA is considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation through its technical partnership with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). See the ‘Adopting emerging technologies’ section in the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/miechnology, the NIAA mandates that all staff complete AI literacy and ethics training as a core requirement under the [APS AI Plan 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). All NIAA staff will complete the [AI in Government Fundamentals](https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/course-sessions/ai-government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies). ## AI safety and governance ### Operating environment NIAA outsources the provision of its ICT network infrastructure & training from PM&C, governed under terms stipulated in a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Oneundamentals) course via the APS Academy. This training covers ethical implications, security risks, and output verification. ## **Governance, reporting, and compliance** To maintain public trust and meet Commonwealth mandatory requirements, the NIAA has implemented the following governance framework and will work ofn the terms in the MoU is NIAA will abide by PM&C’s ICT policies and procedures. Where a statement in this document conflicts with another PM&C AI or ICT policy then the latter will take precedence. ### Governance The governance of all NIAA’s official systems leverages PM&C ICT policies, protocols and procedures, including the PM&C AI Policy. The policy has been developed tose measures: 1. **Accountable Official:** The NIAA Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring agency-wide compliance with [AI policies](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability). 1. **Risk Management:** The NIAA will establish an assessment approach align withed to the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf), and outlines requirements for: 1. measuring effectiveness ofDTA AI Impact Assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) to identify privacy, security, and cultural safety risks for AI use cases. 1. **Mandatory Reporting:** The NIAA will maintain an internal AI Uservices through governance and other processes. 1. maintain compliance with applicable legislation, regulation, and whole of government policies. Please [contact us](https://www.niaa.gov.au/about-niaa/contact-us "Contact us") if you have further enquiries. Case Register. The NIAA will formally notify the DTA of transparency compliance and report any high-risk AI applications as required via the DTA Reporting Portal. 1. **Technical Standards:** The NIAA systems are integrated within PROTECTED ICT environment, managed in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). ## **Transparency and feedback** The NIAA reviews this statement annually. This statement was published on 19 February27 March 20256 and will be reviewed annually, or when: 1. If there is a significantnotable change to the agencyNIAA’s approach to AI, or 1. aAny other new factorCommonwealth and/or DTA measures are introduced which will impacts this statement. ## Feedback Did you find this page useful? Yes No Do you have any oWe encourage feedback from the public regarding our use of these technologies. You can contact us on ther feedback? View our [website privacy notice](https://www.niaa.gov.au/website-privacy-notice "Website Privacy Notice"). Leave this field blankollowing email addresses: - **General enquiries:** [ai@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22ai@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Privacy matters:** [privacy@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22privacy@niaa.gov.au%22). - **Media enquiries:** [media@niaa.gov.au](mailto:%22media@niaa.gov.au%22).
    9de956f
  3. scrape noise-120

    Only breadcrumb navigation and an "On this page" label dropped from the capture; the statement itself is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement [\_\_**Back to** Home](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) - [ Home ](https://www.niaa.gov.au/) \_\_ - Current: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement On this page [ Listen ](https://app-as.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=7448&lang=en_au&readid=page-content__content&url=https://www.niaa.gov.au/artificial-intelligence-ai-transparency-statement "Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker") ## Purpose The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). It sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. This page discusses NIAA’s commitment to these policy requirements and for the ethical use of AI to enhance public services for Indigenous Australians, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. ## NIAA approach to AI adoption and use ### Opportunities and risks The [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf) describes a family of technologies that brings together computing power, scalability, networking, connected devices and interfaces, and data. AI technologies and systems built on these technologies can be programmed to perform specific tasks such as reasoning, planning, natural language processing, computer vision, audio processing, interaction, prediction and more. AI technologies can operate with varying levels of autonomy. These potential efficiencies present opportunities for improved outcomes for service delivery, they also present risks. NIAA continues to review its internal policies to ensure our: 1. AI use is appropriately governed 1. engagement with AI is confident, culturally safe and responsible 1. stakeholders have trust in our use of AI 1. risks are identified and addressed 1. access and usage is monitored. ### How NIAA uses AI At this time NIAA has not authorised the use of AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. In September 2024 NIAA personnel gained access to a generative AI service Microsoft 365 Copilot. The usage of this service is ‘workplace productivity’ in the ‘corporate and enabling’ domain. All staff are required to complete internal AI fundamentals training. NIAA is considering trialling the adoption of AI as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to digital innovation through its technical partnership with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). See the ‘Adopting emerging technologies’ section in the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies). ## AI safety and governance ### Operating environment NIAA outsources the provision of its ICT network infrastructure & training from PM&C, governed under terms stipulated in a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). One of the terms in the MoU is NIAA will abide by PM&C’s ICT policies and procedures. Where a statement in this document conflicts with another PM&C AI or ICT policy then the latter will take precedence. ### Governance The governance of all NIAA’s official systems leverages PM&C ICT policies, protocols and procedures, including the PM&C AI Policy. The policy has been developed to align with the [policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-10/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%201.1.pdf), and outlines requirements for: 1. measuring effectiveness of AI services through governance and other processes. 1. maintain compliance with applicable legislation, regulation, and whole of government policies. Please [contact us](https://www.niaa.gov.au/about-niaa/contact-us "Contact us") if you have further enquiries. This statement was published on 19 February 2025 and will be reviewed annually, or when: 1. there is a significant change to the agency’s approach to AI, or 1. any other new factor impacts this statement. ## Feedback Did you find this page useful? Yes No Do you have any other feedback? View our [website privacy notice](https://www.niaa.gov.au/website-privacy-notice "Website Privacy Notice"). Leave this field blank
    9226d49
  4. first tracked+4831

    First tracked revision.

    07278a5