NDISQSC

NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 4 captures · last changed 26 Feb 2026

The story so far

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement itself says it was first published Feb 2026.

  2. substantive Replaces its "no AI in use" statement with a full disclosure of Copilot Chat, AI contact-centre transcription, planned LLM document annotation, governance and a new contact address.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Removed: claim that the Commission does not use AI internally or externally
    • Discloses Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for staff productivity
    • Discloses cloud contact platform using AI speech, transcription and sentiment analysis
    • Flags planned LLM annotation of complaints, incidents and audit reports from late February 2026
    • Adds commitment that no AI is used where the public interacts directly or is significantly impacted without a human
    • States no regulatory decisions, recruitment or employment decisions are made by AI
    • Adds mandatory AI training for staff before using AI tools
    • Aligns with policy v2.0 and adds usage-pattern/domain classification tables
    • Contact changed from CIO@ndiscommission.gov.au to AI@ndiscommission.gov.au
    • Keeps annual review commitment; statement re-dated February 2026
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Will update this statement in accordance with the Policy when AI capability is implemented
    • Added: Domain added: compliance and fraud detection
    • Added: Domain added: corporate and enabling
    • Added: Domain added: policy and legal
    • Added: Domain added: scientific
    • Added: Domain added: service delivery
    • Added: Named tool added: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
    • Added: New commitment (human oversight): We always maintain appropriate human oversight of AI
    • Added: New commitment (will not): AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection or employment-related decision making
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Does not use browser-based AI to make, automate or determine regulatory or compliance decisions
    • Added: New commitment (will not): No regulatory decisions are made by AI models, nor recommendations on possible regulatory actions
    • Added: New commitment (will): Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks and best practice standards
    • Added: New commitment (will): Only use AI in ways that maintain security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data
    • Added: New commitment (will): Staff must complete internal AI training as a prerequisite to using AI tools
    • Added: New commitment (will): Will update this statement to reflect changes in our approach to AI
    • Added: Safeguard added: acceptable use policy
    • Added: Safeguard added: human review of outputs
    • Added: Safeguard added: privacy or security controls
    • Added: Safeguard added: risk assessment
    • Added: Safeguard added: staff training
    • Added: Staff training: not mentioned → mandatory
    • Added: Usage pattern added: analytics for insights
    • Added: Usage pattern added: decision making and administrative action
    • Added: Usage pattern added: workplace productivity
    • Added: Intentions behind AI use added
    • Added: Legislative compliance statement added
    • Added: Monitoring and protection measures added
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: v1 → v2
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: none → with human review
    • Changed: Stated first-published date: — → 2026-02
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-02 → —
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission now reports active AI use — Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for productivity, an AI-enabled cloud contact platform for transcription and sentiment, and a planned LLM document-annotation capability — across analytics, workplace productivity and decision-support patterns. It stresses that no regulatory decisions are made by AI, requires staff training before access, and commits to human oversight and annual review under policy v2.0. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Decision making and administrative action
  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Service delivery
  • Compliance and fraud detection
  • Policy and legal
  • Scientific
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat

Public-facing AI: yes, with human review

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, staff training, privacy or security controls, an acceptable-use policy

Against the Standard 7/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Present:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Present:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Present:Compliance with the policy
  • Present:Compliance with legislation
  • Missing:Date last updated
  • Present:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
not mentioned
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
no date given
Last change we observed
26 Feb 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes

Commitments

  • will notNo regulatory decisions are made by AI models, nor recommendations on possible regulatory actions
  • will notAI is not used to automate recruitment, selection or employment-related decision making
  • will notDoes not use browser-based AI to make, automate or determine regulatory or compliance decisions
  • human oversightWe always maintain appropriate human oversight of AI
  • willWill review annually, on significant change to AI approach, or when a new factor impacts the statement
  • willWill update this statement to reflect changes in our approach to AI
  • willStaff must complete internal AI training as a prerequisite to using AI tools
  • willComply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks and best practice standards
  • willOnly use AI in ways that maintain security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data

The statement

How to read this

The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our vision to uphold the rights of people with disability and ensure safe, high-quality services across Australia, now and into the future.

The NDIS Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) to ensure our AI use is safe, ethical, and transparent. (Template language)

“AI refers to machine-based systems that analyse data, generate insights, and support decision-making in health and welfare contexts. These systems infer patterns from structured and unstructured data to produce outputs such as predictions, classifications, recommendations, or automation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight.”Also appears in 1 other agencyAIHW

The NDIS Commission will comply with mandatory requirements under the DTA’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, including strategic oversight, operational preparedness, and impact assessment for AI use cases, to ensure our AI practices remain safe, ethical, and transparent. (Template language)

Use of AI by the NDIS Commission

At this time, the NDIS Commission is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. As a prerequisite to using AI tools, NDIS Commission staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI.

The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy.

We classify our AI use according to classification system for AI. Our current and proposed use focuses on the following usage patterns and domains.

The table below represents AI usage patterns at the NDIS Commission:

Usage Pattern| Description
---|---
Analytics for insights| Identifying patterns and producing insights using data analysis and modelling.
Workplace productivity| Automating routine tasks, assisting with document drafting and summarising content.
Decision making and administrative action| Informing performance and productivity improvement. No regulatory decisions are made by AI.

The table below illustrates how the AI usage patterns are applied within the domains where AI is used at the NDIS Commission:

Domain| Description
---|---
Service delivery| Supporting clear communication and timely responses.
Compliance and fraud detection| Identifying anomalies to support compliance activities.
Policy and legal| Assisting analysis and assurance in policy development and legal research.
Scientific| Processing complex datasets to inform monitoring and research.
Corporate and enabling| Improving internal operations (e.g. Finance and ICT) AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection, or employment related decision making.

We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We will closely monitor AI-enabled tools through governance processes, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. We continue to evolve our data governance as our maturity increases. We are expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically.

The NDIS Commission will adhere to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Version 2.0), ensuring safe and ethical AI governance. This commitment includes strategic adoption, operationalising responsible practices, clear accountability, and risk-based oversight. The policy is dynamic and will evolve alongside technological advancements, emerging best practices, and regulatory developments. (Template language)

The NDIS Commission is committed to using AI in a safe, responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives align with the APS values, AI Ethics Principles and are central to the public’s best interest. We will:

  • Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks, and best practice standards.
  • Continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable guidelines and new insights as they emerge.
  • Review this statement annually or when significant changes occur in our AI approach.

Safe and Responsible AI AdoptionAlso appears in 4 other agenciesACSQHCCDCDHACNBA

We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly for the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. Our internal policies and guidance will align with the DTA’s Policy and emerging government standards, including mandatory guardrails for high-risk settings. These policies will cover governance, ethical use, security, record keeping, risk mitigation, and staff responsibilities. They will apply to all employees and contractors.

Examples of how we use AIAlso appears in 1 other agencyATO

The NDIS Commission currently uses AI in the following system use cases, including:

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat:

By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, the NDIS Commission is enhancing staff productivity. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, assist in drafting emails and reports, and assist with data analysis, with staff responsible for reviewing and finalising content. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes.

Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain.Also appears in 1 other agencyATO

Cloud‑based contact solution:

The NDIS Commission is enhancing customer service through the adoption of a secure cloud‑based contact platform. This platform uses AI‑enabled speech and transcription functions to:

  • Convert written text to spoken language.

These capabilities enable the NDIS Commission to gain actionable insights, improve service quality, and optimise communication workflows. The result is a strengthened client experience, achieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness.

Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain.Also appears in 1 other agencyATO

Annotation of Text Documents

This capability is currently scheduled for late February 2026.

This AI use-case involves deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process text documents, such as Complaints, Reportable Incidents, Audit Reports, etc. Our use of LLMs within this processing is limited to annotation of documents with summary information that supports further analysis. No regulatory decisions are made by the model, nor do the models make recommendations on possible regulatory actions. Information is processed in a secure internal environment.

Examples of use include the following:

  • Identifying specific risk-indicators, such as a description within a Complaint indicating that a Participant was physically injured or that the Participant is a child.
  • Categorisation with regard to main topics or themes.
  • Extraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers.

Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that are relevant to a user’s search, may be presented in a summary or detailed views used by regulatory officers as part of an assessment or investigation, and/or may be used as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis.

AI use through the browser

This capability may be available via publicly accessible services; however, the NDIS Commission does not use browser-based AI to make, automate, or determine regulatory or compliance decisions.

Updates and more informationAlso appears in 1 other agencyASIC

This transparency statement was created in February 2026. It will be updated to reflect changes in our approach to AI.

For enquiries, please contact AI@ndiscommission.gov.au.

Statement text © NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. scrape noise-15

    Only a stray "On this page:" navigation heading disappeared from the capture; the statement's text is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    On this page: The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our vision to uphold the rights of people with disability and ensure safe, high-quality services across Australia, now and into the future. The NDIS Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) to ensure our AI use is safe, ethical, and transparent. _“AI refers to machine-based systems that analyse data, generate insights, and support decision-making in health and welfare contexts. These systems infer patterns from structured and unstructured data to produce outputs such as predictions, classifications, recommendations, or automation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight.”_ The NDIS Commission will comply with mandatory requirements under the DTA’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, including strategic oversight, operational preparedness, and impact assessment for AI use cases, to ensure our AI practices remain safe, ethical, and transparent. ## Use of AI by the NDIS Commission At this time, the NDIS Commission is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. As a prerequisite to using AI tools, NDIS Commission staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We classify our AI use according to [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our current and proposed use focuses on the following usage patterns and domains. The table below represents AI usage patterns at the NDIS Commission: Usage Pattern| Description\ ---|---\ Analytics for insights| Identifying patterns and producing insights using data analysis and modelling.\ Workplace productivity| Automating routine tasks, assisting with document drafting and summarising content.\ Decision making and administrative action| Informing performance and productivity improvement. No regulatory decisions are made by AI. The table below illustrates how the AI usage patterns are applied within the domains where AI is used at the NDIS Commission: Domain| Description\ ---|---\ Service delivery| Supporting clear communication and timely responses.\ Compliance and fraud detection| Identifying anomalies to support compliance activities.\ Policy and legal| Assisting analysis and assurance in policy development and legal research.\ Scientific| Processing complex datasets to inform monitoring and research.\ Corporate and enabling| Improving internal operations (e.g. Finance and ICT) AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection, or employment related decision making. ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We will closely monitor AI-enabled tools through governance processes, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. We continue to evolve our data governance as our maturity increases. We are expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. The NDIS Commission will adhere to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Version 2.0), ensuring safe and ethical AI governance. This commitment includes strategic adoption, operationalising responsible practices, clear accountability, and risk-based oversight. The policy is dynamic and will evolve alongside technological advancements, emerging best practices, and regulatory developments. ## Our Commitment The NDIS Commission is committed to using AI in a safe, responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives align with the APS values, AI Ethics Principles and are central to the public’s best interest. We will: - Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks, and best practice standards. - Continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable guidelines and new insights as they emerge. - Review this statement annually or when significant changes occur in our AI approach. ### Safe and Responsible AI Adoption We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly for the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. Our internal policies and guidance will align with the DTA’s Policy and emerging government standards, including mandatory guardrails for high-risk settings. These policies will cover governance, ethical use, security, record keeping, risk mitigation, and staff responsibilities. They will apply to all employees and contractors. ## Examples of how we use AI The NDIS Commission currently uses AI in the following system use cases, including: ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat: By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, the NDIS Commission is enhancing staff productivity. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, assist in drafting emails and reports, and assist with data analysis, with staff responsible for reviewing and finalising content. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain._ ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing customer service through the adoption of a secure cloud‑based contact platform. This platform uses AI‑enabled speech and transcription functions to: - Convert written text to spoken language. - Transcribe audio conversations. - Assess customer sentiment. These capabilities enable the NDIS Commission to gain actionable insights, improve service quality, and optimise communication workflows. The result is a strengthened client experience, achieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently scheduled for late February 2026. This AI use-case involves deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process text documents, such as Complaints, Reportable Incidents, Audit Reports, etc. Our use of LLMs within this processing is limited to annotation of documents with summary information that supports further analysis. No regulatory decisions are made by the model, nor do the models make recommendations on possible regulatory actions. Information is processed in a secure internal environment. Examples of use include the following: - Identifying specific risk-indicators, such as a description within a Complaint indicating that a Participant was physically injured or that the Participant is a child. - Categorisation with regard to main topics or themes. - Extraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. _Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that are relevant to a user’s search, may be presented in a summary or detailed views used by regulatory officers as part of an assessment or investigation, and/or may be used as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis._ ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via publicly accessible services; however, the NDIS Commission does not use browser-based AI to make, automate, or determine regulatory or compliance decisions. ## Updates and more information This transparency statement was created in February 2026. It will be updated to reflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [**AI@ndiscommission.gov.au**](mailto:AI@ndiscommission.gov.au).
    d4197a9
  2. formatting only+10
    View diff
    On this page: The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our vision to uphold the rights of people with disability and ensure safe, high-quality services across Australia, now and into the future. The NDIS Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) to ensure our AI use is safe, ethical, and transparent. _“AI refers to machine-based systems that analyse data, generate insights, and support decision-making in health and welfare contexts. These systems infer patterns from structured and unstructured data to produce outputs such as predictions, classifications, recommendations, or automation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight.”_ The NDIS Commission will comply with mandatory requirements under the DTA’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, including strategic oversight, operational preparedness, and impact assessment for AI use cases, to ensure our AI practices remain safe, ethical, and transparent. ## Use of AI by the NDIS Commission At this time, the NDIS Commission is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. As a prerequisite to using AI tools, NDIS Commission staff are required to complete internal training on the use of AI. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We classify our AI use according to [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our current and proposed use focuses on the following usage patterns and domains. The table below represents AI usage patterns at the NDIS Commission: Usage Pattern| Description\ ---|---\ Analytics for insights| Identifying patterns and producing insights using data analysis and modelling.\ Workplace productivity| Automating routine tasks, assisting with document drafting and summarising content.\ Decision making and administrative action| Informing performance and productivity improvement. No regulatory decisions are made by AI. The table below illustrates how the AI usage patterns are applied within the domains where AI is used at the NDIS Commission: Domain| Description\ ---|---\ Service delivery| Supporting clear communication and timely responses.\ Compliance and fraud detection| Identifying anomalies to support compliance activities.\ Policy and legal| Assisting analysis and assurance in policy development and legal research.\ Scientific| Processing complex datasets to inform monitoring and research.\ Corporate and enabling| Improving internal operations (e.g. Finance and ICT) AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection, or employment related decision making. ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We will closely monitor AI-enabled tools through governance processes, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. We continue to evolve our data governance as our maturity increases. We are expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. The NDIS Commission will adhere to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Version 2.0), ensuring safe and ethical AI governance. This commitment includes strategic adoption, operationalising responsible practices, clear accountability, and risk-based oversight. The policy is dynamic and will evolve alongside technological advancements, emerging best practices, and regulatory developments. ## Our Commitment The NDIS Commission is committed to using AI in a safe, responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives align with the APS values, AI Ethics Principles and are central to the public’s best interest. We will: - Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks, and best practice standards. - Continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable guidelines and new insights as they emerge. - Review this statement annually or when significant changes occur in our AI approach. ### Safe and Responsible AI Adoption We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly for the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. Our internal policies and guidance will align with the DTA’s Policy and emerging government standards, including mandatory guardrails for high-risk settings. These policies will cover governance, ethical use, security, record keeping, risk mitigation, and staff responsibilities. They will apply to all employees and contractors. ## Examples of how we use AI The NDIS Commission currently uses AI in the following system use cases, including: ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat: By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, the NDIS Commission is enhancing staff productivity. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, assist in drafting emails and reports, and assist with data analysis, with staff responsible for reviewing and finalising content. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain._ ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing customer service through the adoption of a secure cloud‑based contact platform. This platform uses AI‑enabled speech and transcription functions to: - Convert written text to spoken language. - Transcribe audio conversations. - Assess customer sentiment. These capabilities enable the NDIS Commission to gain actionable insights, improve service quality, and optimise communication workflows. The result is a strengthened client experience, achieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently scheduled for late February 2026. This AI use-case involves deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process text documents, such as Complaints, Reportable Incidents, Audit Reports, etc. Our use of LLMs within this processing is limited to annotation of documents with summary information that supports further analysis. No regulatory decisions are made by the model, nor do the models make recommendations on possible regulatory actions. Information is processed in a secure internal environment. Examples of use include the following: - Identifying specific risk-indicators, such as a description within a Complaint indicating that a Participant was physically injured or that the Participant is a child. - Categorisation with regard to main topics or themes. - Extraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. _Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that are relevant to a user’s search, may be presented in a summary or detailed views used by regulatory officers as part of an assessment or investigation, and/or may be used as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis._ ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via publicly accessible services; however, the NDIS Commission does not use browser-based AI to make, automate, or determine regulatory or compliance decisions. ## Updates and more information This transparency statement was created in February 2026. It will be updated to reflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [**AI@ndiscommission.gov.au**](mailto:AI@ndiscommission.gov.au).
    dc4552a
  3. substantive+7252

    Replaces its "no AI in use" statement with a full disclosure of Copilot Chat, AI contact-centre transcription, planned LLM document annotation, governance and a new contact address.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    **February 2025** The Digital Transformation Agency's [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf) (the Policy) sets out the Australian Government’On this page: The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s commitment to the safe and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports our vision to uphold the rights of people with disability and ensure safe, high-quality services across Australia, now and into the future. The NDIS Commission applies the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) definition of AI in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) to ensure our AI use is safe, ethical, and transparent. _“AI refers to machine-based systems that analyse data, generate insights, and support decision-making in health and welfare contexts. These systems infer patterns from structured and unstructured data to produce outputs such as predictions, classifications, recommendations, or automation of routine tasks, with varying levels of human oversight.”_ The NDIS Commission will comply with mandatory requirements under the DTA’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, including strategic oversight, operational preparedness, and impact assessment for AI use cases, to ensure our AI practices remain safe, ethical, and transparent. ## Use of AI by the NDIS Commission At this time, the NDIS Commission is not using AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or intervention. As ap proach to embracerequisite to using AI tools, NDIS Commission staff are required to complete internal training on the opportunities of AI while ensuring that use is safe and responsible. Transparency is use of AI. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We classify our AI use according to [classification system for AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our current and proposed use focuses on the following usage patterns and domains. The table below represents AI usage patterns at the NDIS Commission: Usage Pattern| Descriptical to building public trust and is an important aim of the Policy and the broader APS Reform agenda. An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment. Currently, the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (NDIS Commission) does not use AI in services or advice we provide externally (publicly) or internallyon\ ---|---\ Analytics for insights| Identifying patterns and producing insights using data analysis and modelling.\ Workplace productivity| Automating routine tasks, assisting with document drafting and summarising content.\ Decision making and administrative action| Informing performance and productivity improvement. No regulatory decisions are made by AI. The table below illustrates how the AI usage patterns are applied within the domains where AI is used at the NDIS Commission: Domain| Description\ ---|---\ Service delivery| Supporting clear communication and timely responses.\ Compliance and fraud detection| Identifying anomalies to support compliance activities.\ Policy and legal| Assisting analysis and assurance in policy development and legal research.\ Scientific| Processing complex datasets to inform monitoring and research.\ Corporate and enabling| Improving internal operations (e.g. Finance and ICT) AI is not used to automate recruitment, selection, or employment related decision making. ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We will closely monitor AI-enabled tools through governance processes, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. We continue to evolve our data governance as our maturity increases. We are expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. The NDIS Commission will adhere to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government (Version 2.0), ensuring safe and ethical AI governance. This commitment includes strategic adoption, operationalising responsible practices, clear accountability, and risk-based oversight. The policy is dynamic and will evolve alongside technological advancements, emerging best practices, and regulatory developments. ## Our Commitment The NDIS Commission is committed to using AI in a safe, responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives align with the APS values, AI Ethics Principles and are central to the public’s best interest. We will: - Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, frameworks, and best practice standards. - Continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable guidelines and new insights as they emerge. - Review this statement annually or when significant changes occur in our AI approach. ### Safe and Responsible AI Adoption We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly for the evolving AI technology and policy requirements. Our internal policies and guidance will align with the DTA’s Policy and emerging government standards, including mandatory guardrails for high-risk settings. These policies will cover governance, ethical use, security, record keeping, risk mitigation, and staff responsibilities. They will apply to all employees and contractors. ## Examples of how we use AI The NDIS Commission currently uses AI in the following system use cases, including: ### Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat: By integrating Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, the NDIS Commission is enhancing staff productivity. Copilot leverages generative AI to help automate repetitive tasks, summarise documents, assist in drafting emails and reports, and assist with data analysis, with staff responsible for reviewing and finalising content. This enables staff to focus on higher-value work, make more informed decisions, and reduce time spent on manual processes. Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain. ### Cloud‑based contact solution: The NDIS Commission is enhancing customer service through the adoption of a secure cloud‑based contact platform. This platform uses AI‑enabled speech and transcription functions to: - Convert written text to spoken language. - Transcribe audio conversations. - Assess customer sentiment. WThen the NDIS Commission implements AI capability, we will update this statement in accordance with the Policy. This statement will also be reviewed annually, when we make a significant change to our approach to AI, or when any new factor impacts this statementse capabilities enable the NDIS Commission to gain actionable insights, improve service quality, and optimise communication workflows. The result is a strengthened client experience, achieved through greater transparency, efficiency and responsiveness. Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain. ### Annotation of Text Documents This capability is currently scheduled for late February 2026. This AI use-case involves deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process text documents, such as Complaints, Reportable Incidents, Audit Reports, etc. Our use of LLMs within this processing is limited to annotation of documents with summary information that supports further analysis. No regulatory decisions are made by the model, nor do the models make recommendations on possible regulatory actions. Information is processed in a secure internal environment. Examples of use include the following: - Identifying specific risk-indicators, such as a description within a Complaint indicating that a Participant was physically injured or that the Participant is a child. - Categorisation with regard to main topics or themes. - Extraction of entity names to identify relevant Providers or Workers. Annotations provided by an LLM may be used to identify records that are relevant to a user’s search, may be presented in a summary or detailed views used by regulatory officers as part of an assessment or investigation, and/or may be used as part of an aggregation for reporting or to inform macro-analysis. ### AI use through the browser This capability may be available via publicly accessible services; however, the NDIS Commission does not use browser-based AI to make, automate, or determine regulatory or compliance decisions. ## Updates and more information This transparency statement was created in February 2026. It will be updated to reflect changes in our approach to AI. For enquiries, please contact [CIOAI@ndiscommission.gov.au](mailto:CIOAI@ndiscommission.gov.au).
    078058e
  4. first tracked+1381

    First tracked revision.

    07278a5