NZEA

Net Zero Economy Authority

View the original ↗ redirects to www.nzea.gov.au

Tracked since 7 June 2026 · 1 change of substance across 4 versions · last changed 11 July 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. First tracked.

  2. substantive Rewrites its statement to stand on its own rather than lean on PM&C's. It names its CIO as accountable official, discloses its AI uses, adds an annual review, gives its own contact and drops the public-interaction safeguard.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Removed: commitment not to use AI where the public may directly interact with it or be significantly affected by it without a human intermediary
    • Removed: principle that AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services
    • Removed: ban on putting classified, sensitive or personal information into AI
    • Removed: rule allowing only AI tools authorised on PM&C's ICT systems, and the statement that NZEA runs on PM&C's systems and follows PM&C's AI statement
    • Chief Information Officer named as AI accountable official, supported by the IT and Security team and the Executive Team
    • Discloses AI use limited to web search and an internal data and insights capability, measured against the DTA's AI usage patterns
    • Staff review all AI outputs and treat them as drafts, not for decision-making
    • New commitment to review the statement at least every 12 months and update it if anything materially affects its accuracy
    • Contact changed from the PM&C IT service desk to itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au
    • Accountability principle cut back to human oversight only; the part on identifiable, accountable people is dropped
    • Centralised oversight of AI tools through the accountable official and the Executive Team
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive or personal information
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): Will not use AI where the public directly interacts or is significantly impacted without a human intermediary
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Only AI tools authorised for access and use within PM&C's ICT systems are deployed
    • Removed: Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
    • Removed: Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
    • Added: Accountable official: not mentioned → designated
    • Added: New commitment (will): Centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team
    • Added: New commitment (will): Review statement at least every 12 months and update if AI approach changes
    • Added: Safeguard added: governance body
    • Added: Safeguard added: testing or evaluation
    • Added: Usage pattern added: analytics for insights
    • Added: Usage pattern added: workplace productivity
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: with human review → not addressed
    • Changed: Review cadence: not stated → annual and on change
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The NZEA says its AI use is limited to web search and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all outputs and treat them as drafts, not as a basis for decisions. It says it aligns with policy v2.0 and Australia's AI Ethics Principles, and governs AI through an internal AI policy. Its Chief Information Officer is the accountable official, and centralised oversight comes from that official and the Executive Team. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity

Public-facing AI: not addressed

Safeguards named: human review of outputs, staff training, an acceptable-use policy, a governance body, testing or evaluation

The Standard’s eight elements 6 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Not found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Not found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
10 Jul 2026
Last change we saw
11 July 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • human oversight Users must critically examine AI outputs and be able to justify their decisions
  • human oversight AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services
  • will AI used consistently with the APS Values, Employment Principles and Code of Conduct
  • will Centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team
  • will Review statement at least every 12 months and update if AI approach changes

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement Also appears in 11 other agencies ADHA AFMA CCA CGC DAFF DCCEEW DISR FWC HOUSEREPS JSA OTA

The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery.

The NZEA has aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. (Template language)

This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements.

Our approach to AI transparency Also appears in 2 other agencies DVSC PMC

The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles we have adopted, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles.

  • Human, societal and environmental wellbeing: AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment.
  • Human-centred values: AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals.
  • Fairness: AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups.
  • Privacy protection and security: AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data.
  • Reliability and safety: AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose.
  • Transparency and explainability: There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them.
  • Contestability: When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system.
  • Accountability: Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled.

The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the acceptable use of AI.

Across platforms and systems, AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.

The NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability.

Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. Also appears in 1 other agency MDBA

The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to ensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and requirements.

Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable official. (Template language)

The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. (Template language)

This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy.

For further information on the NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact the NZEA at itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au.

Statement text © Net Zero Economy Authority. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. noise -11

    A stray "Search" heading from the page's navigation dropped out of the capture after the contact details; the statement text is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    [ Home ](https://www.netzero.gov.au/) Policies # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. The NZEA has aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles we have adopted, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment. - **Human-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups. - **Privacy protection and security:** AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data. - **Reliability and safety:** AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose. - **Transparency and explainability:** There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them. - **Contestability:** When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system. - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the acceptable use of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be used in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) The NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to ensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and requirements. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable official. ## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on the NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact the NZEA at [itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au](mailto:itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au). ## Search
    8f6927f
  2. noise +49

    Breadcrumb navigation ("Home", "Policies") from the page now shows up above the statement. The statement text itself is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    [ Home ](https://www.netzero.gov.au/) Policies # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. The NZEA has aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles we have adopted, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment. - **Human-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups. - **Privacy protection and security:** AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data. - **Reliability and safety:** AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose. - **Transparency and explainability:** There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them. - **Contestability:** When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system. - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the acceptable use of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be used in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) The NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to ensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and requirements. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable official. ## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on the NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact the NZEA at [itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au](mailto:itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au). ## Search
    89d7a58
  3. substantive -276

    Rewrites its statement to stand on its own rather than lean on PM&C's. It names its CIO as accountable official, discloses its AI uses, adds an annual review, gives its own contact and drops the public-interaction safeguard.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. As tThe NZEA is currently operating on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) ICT systems and policies, our use of and approach to AI aligns with [PM&C’s AI Transparency Statehas aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.pmcdigital.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-reporting/artificial-intelligence-ai-sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency- statement) and [_Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-s. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles). Thes we have been adaopted below. Our approach to AI transparency:, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment. - **Human-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups. - **Privacy protection and security:** AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data. - **Reliability and safety:** AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose. - **Transparency and explainability:** There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them. - **Contestability:** When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system. - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled, and people responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the accouneptable for the outcomes of the AI systems. The NZEA has committed to the Digital Information Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf) Wuse of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be use AId in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) In addition to _Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_ , the NZEA has adopted the following 6 AI principles: 1. Only AI tools that are authorised for access and use within PM&C’s ICT systems are to be deployed. 1. Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. 1. AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. 1. AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services. 1. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Employment Principals and Code of Conduct. 1. The NZEA will not use AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or interventionThe NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to helpensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and the requirement to adhere to both internal and external pols. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable officiesal. We are dedicated to fostering public trust by ensuring AI-driven processes remain **ethical, responsible, and## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to aligned with the interests of the Australian Government** while still being able to harness AI benefitsechnology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on PM&Cthe NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact [Help-ITSthe NZEA at [itserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au](mailto:Help-ITSitserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au). ## Search
    072b91a
  4. first tracked +3849

    First tracked version.

    22b04fb