NZEA

Net Zero Economy Authority

View the original ↗redirects to www.nzea.gov.au

Tracked since 7 June 2026 · 1 change of substance across 3 captures · last changed 11 July 2026

The story so far

How to read this
  1. First captured by the tracker.

  2. substantive Rewrites its statement to the DTA policy: names the CIO as accountable official, discloses actual AI uses and a 12-month review, and drops its six AI rules.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Removed: commitment not to use AI that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by without a human intermediary
    • Names the Chief Information Officer as AI accountable official, supported by IT/Security and Executive teams
    • Discloses AI use limited to web search and an internal data and insights capability, measured against DTA usage patterns
    • Removed: the other five PM&C-derived rules (only authorised tools, no classified/sensitive/personal input, AI not final decision-maker, justify decisions)
    • Adds commitment to review the statement at least every 12 months
    • Contact changes from PM&C's IT service desk to itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au
    • Removed: reliance on PM&C's ICT systems and its AI transparency statement
    • Accountability principle trimmed to human oversight only, dropping identifiable, accountable people across the AI lifecycle
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive or personal information
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): Only AI tools authorised for access and use within PM&C's ICT systems are to be deployed
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): Will not use AI that the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary
    • Removed: Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
    • Removed: Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
    • Added: New commitment (will): Will review the statement at least every 12 months and update if the approach changes
    • Added: Safeguard added: governance body
    • Added: Usage pattern added: analytics for insights
    • Added: Usage pattern added: workplace productivity
    • Added: Accountable official: not mentioned → designated
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: none → not addressed
    • Changed: Review cadence: not stated → annual and on change
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The Net Zero Economy Authority now publishes its own statement: AI use is limited to web search and an internal data and insights capability, guided by an AI policy based on Australia's AI Ethics Principles. Staff review all AI outputs as drafts rather than for decision-making, with the Chief Information Officer as accountable official and annual review. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity

Public-facing AI: not addressed

Safeguards named: human review of outputs, staff training, an acceptable-use policy, a governance body

Against the Standard 6/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Present:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Missing:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Present:Compliance with the policy
  • Missing:Compliance with legislation
  • Present:Date last updated
  • Present:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
10 Jul 2026
Last change we observed
11 July 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • will notAI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services
  • human oversightUsers must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions
  • willAI must be used consistently with APS Values, Employment Principles and Code of Conduct
  • willProvides guidance and training in AI fundamentals to staff
  • willWill review the statement at least every 12 months and update if the approach changes

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence Transparency StatementAlso appears in 11 other agenciesADHAAFMACCACGCDAFFDCCEEWDISRFWCHOUSEREPSIPAJSA

The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery.

The NZEA has aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. (Template language)

This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements.

Our approach to AI transparencyAlso appears in 1 other agencyPMC

The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles we have adopted, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles.

  • Human, societal and environmental wellbeing: AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment.
  • Human-centred values: AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals.
  • Fairness: AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups.
  • Privacy protection and security: AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data.
  • Reliability and safety: AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose.
  • Transparency and explainability: There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them.
  • Contestability: When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system.
  • Accountability: Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled.

The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the acceptable use of AI.

Across platforms and systems, AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.

The NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability.

Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making.Also appears in 1 other agencyMDBA

The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to ensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and requirements.

Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable official. (Template language)

The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. (Template language)

This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy.

For further information on the NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact the NZEA at itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au.

Statement text © Net Zero Economy Authority, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. scrape noise+49

    Only breadcrumb navigation links leaked into the capture; the statement text is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    [ Home ](https://www.netzero.gov.au/) Policies # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. The NZEA has aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles we have adopted, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment. - **Human-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups. - **Privacy protection and security:** AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data. - **Reliability and safety:** AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose. - **Transparency and explainability:** There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them. - **Contestability:** When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system. - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the acceptable use of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be used in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) The NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to ensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and requirements. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable official. ## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on the NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact the NZEA at [itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au](mailto:itservicedesk@nzea.gov.au). ## Search
    9ccac88
  2. substantive-276

    Rewrites its statement to the DTA policy: names the CIO as accountable official, discloses actual AI uses and a 12-month review, and drops its six AI rules.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement The Net Zero Economy Authority (NZEA) recognises the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and service delivery. As tThe NZEA is currently operating on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) ICT systems and policies, our use of and approach to AI aligns with [PM&C’s AI Transparency Statehas aligned to the Digital Transformation Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._ ](https://www.pmcdigital.gov.au/about-us/accountability-and-reporting/corporate-reporting/artificial-intelligence-ai-sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf)The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency- statement) and [_Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-s. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Our approach to AI transparency The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the principles). Thes we have been adaopted below. Our approach to AI transparency:, informed by Australia’s AI Ethics Principles. - **Human, societal and environmental wellbeing:** AI systems should benefit individuals, society and the environment. - **Human-centred values:** AI systems should respect human rights, diversity, and the autonomy of individuals. - **Fairness:** AI systems should be inclusive and accessible and should not involve or result in unfair discrimination against individuals, communities or groups. - **Privacy protection and security:** AI systems should respect and uphold privacy rights and data protection and ensure the security of data. - **Reliability and safety:** AI systems should reliably operate in accordance with their intended purpose. - **Transparency and explainability:** There should be transparency and responsible disclosure so people can understand when they are being significantly impacted by AI and can find out when an AI system is engaging with them. - **Contestability:** When an AI system significantly impacts a person, community, group or environment, there should be a timely process to allow people to challenge the use or outcomes of the AI system. - **Accountability:** Human oversight of AI systems should be enabled, and people responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and. ## How we use AI The NZEA’s AI policy sets out the accouneptable for the outcomes of the AI systems. The NZEA has committed to the Digital Information Agency’s [ _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government._](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-12/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20Government%202.0_0.pdf) Wuse of AI. Across platforms and systems, AI must be use AId in a manner consistent with the [APS Values, Code of Conduct and Employment Principles.](https://www.apsc.gov.au/working-aps/integrity/integrity-resources/aps-values-code-conduct-and-employment-principles) In addition to _Australia’s AI Ethics Principles_ , the NZEA has adopted the following 6 AI principles: 1. Only AI tools that are authorised for access and use within PM&C’s ICT systems are to be deployed. 1. Users must critically examine AI outputs and ensure they can justify their decisions. 1. AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive, or personal information. 1. AI must not be the final decision-maker on government advice and services. 1. AI must be used in a manner consistent with the APS Values, Employment Principals and Code of Conduct. 1. The NZEA will not use AI in any way that members of the public may directly interact with, or be significantly impacted by, without a human intermediary or interventionThe NZEA measures AI usage against AI Usage Patterns as set out by the DTA. The NZEA’s implementation of AI is limited to web search, and an internal data and insights capability. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. The NZEA provides guidance to staff, including training in AI fundamentals, to helpensure an understanding of compliance and governance arrangements and the requirement to adhere to both internal and external pols. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The IT and Security team and the Executive Team support the accountable officiesal. We are dedicated to fostering public trust by ensuring AI-driven processes remain **ethical, responsible, and## Our commitment The NZEA will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the Accountable Official and Executive Team. This statement will evolve to aligned with the interests of the Australian Government** while still being able to harness AI benefitsechnology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. For further information on PM&Cthe NZEA’s AI governance and transparency please contact [Help-ITSthe NZEA at [itserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au](mailto:Help-ITSitserviceDdesk@pmcnzea.gov.au). ## Search
    ca85d3a
  3. first tracked+3849

    First tracked revision.

    9ff8360