ATO

Australian Taxation Office

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 2 changes of substance across 3 versions · last changed 28 July 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed, and doesn’t say when it was first published.

  2. substantive The ATO discloses AI use in law enforcement and intelligence and in image processing, commits to policy v2.0 and a standalone AI policy, and drops its claim that it doesn't use AI for administrative action.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Removed: the note that the ATO does not use AI for administrative action
    • New domain disclosed: law enforcement, intelligence and security (AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering)
    • New usage pattern disclosed: image processing
    • New uses: alerting taxpayers to lodgments suspected of identity crime; improving the readability of public advice content
    • States it complies with policy v1.1, commits to implementing v2.0 from 15 December 2025, and promises a standalone AI policy for staff
    • AI use limited to approved tools for approved use cases; enterprise generative AI use being expanded
    • Human-decision commitment now covers decisions that adversely affect taxpayers' rights, not just taxpayers
    • Removed: the 'Published 28 February 2025' date
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): We do not use AI for administrative action
    • Added: Domain added: law enforcement intelligence and security
    • Added: New commitment (will not): AI use limited to approved tools used for approved use cases under our AI policy
    • Added: New commitment (will): Committed to implementing version 2.0 policy requirements from 15 December 2025
    • Added: New commitment (will): Will soon release a standalone AI policy setting staff obligations to support version 2.0
    • Added: Safeguard added: acceptable use policy
    • Added: Usage pattern added: image processing
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: unspecified → v2
    • Changed: Stated first-published date: 2025-02-28 → —
    Show the words that changed ↓
  3. substantive The ATO adds a policy and legal domain of AI use, now says it complies with version 2.0 of the policy, and says its standalone AI policy has been released.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Compliance claim moved from version 1.1 to version 2.0 of the AI in government policy
    • Standalone staff AI policy now described as released rather than forthcoming
    • New policy and legal domain: drafting responses to ministerial correspondence for review and summarising public content for legal and policy research
    • Generative AI expansion now covers the analytics for insights usage pattern as well as workplace productivity
    • Added: Domain added: policy and legal
    • Changed: Commitment kept (will): Will soon release a standalone AI policy setting staff obligations to support version 2.0
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The ATO uses AI (machine learning and generative AI) for taxpayer-facing service delivery such as myTax prompts and its virtual assistant Alex, for fraud and compliance risk models reviewed by staff, for intelligence analysis, for policy and legal drafting and research, and for corporate work such as drafting and content production. Its Chief Data Officer is the AI accountable official. The ATO limits AI to approved tools and use cases under a newly released standalone AI policy, says it complies with version 2.0 of the policy, and keeps human decisions on adverse outcomes. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Decision making and administrative action
  • Image processing
  • Service delivery
  • Compliance and fraud detection
  • Corporate and enabling
  • Law enforcement, intelligence and security
  • Policy and legal

Named tools: Alex

Public-facing AI: yes, human review not stated

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, staff training, privacy or security controls, an acceptable-use policy

The Standard’s eight elements 8 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Data Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
other
Says it was last updated
27 Jul 2026
Last change we saw
28 July 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • will not AI use limited to approved tools used for approved use cases under our AI policy
  • human oversight Decision making that adversely impacts taxpayers will always be made by a human
  • human oversight We always maintain appropriate human oversight of AI
  • will Only use AI in ways that maintain security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data
  • will Continue to evaluate and change data governance so it remains fit for purpose
  • will Continue to train and develop staff to use AI safely, responsibly and ethically
  • will Expanding policies and guidance to reference AI more directly
  • will Review the AI transparency statement regularly and publish updates on our website
  • will Committed to implementing version 2.0 policy requirements from 15 December 2025

The statement

How to read this

ATO AI transparency statement

See our public transparency statement outlining how we approach artificial intelligence (AI) in the ATO.

In the ATO, we use data and analytics (D&A), including automation and AI, and the insights they provide. D&A helps us administer the tax and superannuation systems more effectively. It enables us to tailor our services and make more informed decisions. It also makes it easier for taxpayers to comply and harder not to.

We apply the OECD definition of AIExternal Link, in line with the Policy for the responsible use of AI in governmentExternal Link. We also include any application of machine learning, deep learning and generative AI as 'AI'. We don’t consider rules-based analytics, which are often if-then statements, to be AI. This form of analytics does not infer how to generate outputs from the inputs they receive. (Template language)

While AI and automation are sometimes combined to deliver outcomes, they are distinct capabilities. Automated processes can be implemented without the use of AI, and vice versa.

We use AI to assist our staff to more quickly process large volumes of complex data to identify insights and risks. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy.

We also use AI to ensure we can continue to protect the tax and superannuation systems from external fraud and cyber attacks.

Based on the classification system for AIExternal Link in government, we are using AI in the:

  • usage patterns of analytics for insights, image processing, workplace productivity and decision making and administrative action
  • domains of service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, corporate and enabling, law enforcement, intelligence and security, and policy and legal.

Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains: Also appears in 1 other agency GA

  • providing real time prompts to taxpayers
  • powering our virtual assistant Alex
  • managing call centre volumes
  • assisting with readability and structure of select public advice and guidance content
  • compliance and fraud detection Also appears in 9 other agencies ACQSC AGD CER DAFF DFAT DHAC OPC RAM SERVICESAUSTRALIA
  • reviewing large quantities of unstructured data
  • powering risk models to identify potential non-compliance or fraud for human review
  • alert taxpayers to lodgments suspected of identity crime
  • corporate and enabling services Also appears in 2 other agencies AGD OPC
  • creating initial draft communications for review
  • law enforcement, intelligence and security Also appears in 1 other agency NACC
  • supporting AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering
  • creating initial draft communications to ministerial correspondence for review
  • summarising publicly available content to support legal and policy research.

Under our AI policy, AI use is limited to approved tools used for approved use cases.

We are currently expanding our use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technology in the workplace productivity and analytics for insights usage patterns.

See Examples of how we use AI.

We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes.

We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We closely monitor, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We also actively identify and manage risks associated with all applications of AI. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight.

Our Chief Data Officer (CDO) oversees the development and use of data, analytics and insights. These support the administration of the tax and superannuation systems and government priorities. They deliver value for the Australian community. The CDO is also our AI Accountable Official under the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. (Template language)

Our existing D&A (including data governance and ethics) and IT policies already broadly apply to AI. We continue to evolve our data governance as our D&A maturity increases, expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. Our approach adheres to all AI-related legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks, and all standard laws and frameworks.

The ATO is compliant with the latest version (2.0) of the AI in government policy. Version 2.0 of the policy introduced new requirements from 15 December 2025, which we are committed to implementing. The ATO recently released a standalone AI policy outlining specific obligations for staff when interacting with, using, or developing AI to support version 2.0 requirements.

AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically.

Decision making that adversely impacts taxpayers' rights will always be made by a human. Taxpayers have a right of review of our decisions. Their rights apply regardless of the technology we use to help us make those decisions.

We will review our AI transparency statement regularly and publish updates on our website. If you have feedback on our AI transparency statement, you can contact us.

Examples of how we use AI Also appears in 1 other agency NDISQSC

The following examples show how we are using AI successfully to help get tax right from the start, reduce fraud and improve communications.

We have developed AI models to help reduce taxpayer compliance costs and improve the efficiency of the tax system. We use these models to prompt individuals completing their tax return online through myTax to help them get it right.

The real-time prompts ask the taxpayer to check amounts they have entered for certain tax return labels. This is when the amounts don't match what we expect when compared to other taxpayers with similar attributes or amounts entered in previous years. The taxpayer can then review and amend any mistakes before lodging, getting their tax right from the start.

Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain. Also appears in 1 other agency NDISQSC

We manage the myID digital platform, which provides an easy and secure way for individuals to prove their identity and access a range of government online services. We use AI to scan all myID accounts to identify and risk score the likelihood of digital identity theft (third-party fraud). We base this on a pre-defined range or parameter of inputs.

The ranked results and drivers of the risk scores are provided to digital identify fraud investigators (ATO staff) for review. The investigators review the results, with a focus on those rated high risk. They then determine if a myID should be suspended. Investigators can view all results, not just those rated high risk.

Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, compliance and fraud detection domain.

We use AI tools for creative and video production activities. They help us edit and enhance content quality and automate manual tasks. We use AI tools to separate subjects from backgrounds, resize images, and apply consistent styles. They also help us resolve accessibility issues, including readability, colour contrast, and formats. AI helps us produce better communications content in less time and cost.

Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain. Also appears in 1 other agency NDISQSC

Statement text © Australian Taxation Office. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. substantive +96

    The ATO adds a policy and legal domain of AI use, now says it complies with version 2.0 of the policy, and says its standalone AI policy has been released.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # ATO AI transparency statement See our public transparency statement outlining how we approach artificial intelligence (AI) in the ATO. Print or Download ## How we define AI In the ATO, we use data and analytics (D&A), including automation and AI, and the insights they provide. D&A helps us administer the tax and superannuation systems more effectively. It enables us to tailor our services and make more informed decisions. It also makes it easier for taxpayers to comply and harder not to. We apply the [OECD definition of AIExternal Link](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles), in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in governmentExternal Link](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). We also include any application of machine learning, deep learning and generative AI as 'AI'. We don’t consider rules-based analytics, which are often if-then statements, to be AI. This form of analytics does not infer how to generate outputs from the inputs they receive. While AI and automation are sometimes combined to deliver outcomes, they are distinct capabilities. Automated processes can be implemented without the use of AI, and vice versa. ## Why we use AI in the ATO We use AI to assist our staff to more quickly process large volumes of complex data to identify insights and risks. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We also use AI to ensure we can continue to protect the tax and superannuation systems from external fraud and cyber attacks. ### How we use AI in the ATO Based on the [classification system for AIExternal Link](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) in government, we are using AI in the: - usage patterns of analytics for insights, image processing, workplace productivity and decision making and administrative action - domains of service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, corporate and enabling, and law enforcement, intelligence and security, and policy and legal. Examples of how we are applying AI in these domains: - service delivery - providing real time prompts to taxpayers - sending payment reminders - powering our virtual assistant Alex - managing call centre volumes - assisting with readability and structure of select public advice and guidance content - compliance and fraud detection - reviewing large quantities of unstructured data - powering risk models to identify potential non-compliance or fraud for human review - alert taxpayers to lodgments suspected of identity crime - corporate and enabling services - creating initial draft communications for review - summarising content - law enforcement, intelligence and security - supporting AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering - policy and legal - creating initial draft communications to ministerial correspondence for review - summarising publicly available content to support legal and policy research. Under our AI policy, AI use is limited to approved tools used for approved use cases. We are currently expanding our use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technology forin the workplace productivity use. See [Examples of how we use AI](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/ato-ai-transparency-statement#and analytics for insights usage patterns. See Examples of how we use AI). ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We closely monitor, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We also actively identify and manage risks associated with all applications of AI. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. Our Chief Data Officer (CDO) oversees the development and use of data, analytics and insights. These support the administration of the tax and superannuation systems and government priorities. They deliver value for the Australian community. The CDO is also our AI Accountable Official under the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_. Our existing D&A (including data governance and [ethics](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/data-and-analytics/how-we-use-data-and-analytics#ato-Howweprotectyourdataandprivacy)) and IT policies already broadly apply to AI. We continue to evolve our data governance as our D&A maturity increases, expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. Our approach adheres to all AI-related legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks, and all standard laws and frameworks. At time of publishing, tThe ATO is compliant with the latest version 1.1(2.0) of the _AI in government policy_. Version 2.0 of the policy introducesd new requirements from 15 December 2025, which we are committed to implementing. The ATO will soonrecently released a standalone AI policy outlining specific obligations for staff when interacting with, using, or developing AI to support version 2.0 requirements. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. Decision making that adversely impacts taxpayers' rights will always be made by a human. Taxpayers have a [right of review](https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/your-tax-return/if-you-disagree-with-an-ato-decision) of our decisions. Their rights apply regardless of the technology we use to help us make those decisions. We will review our AI transparency statement regularly and publish updates on our website. If you have feedback on our AI transparency statement, you can [contact us](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/contact-us/complaints-compliments-and-feedback/compliments-and-feedback). ## Examples of how we use AI The following examples show how we are using AI successfully to help get tax right from the start, reduce fraud and improve communications. ### Tax time nudging We have developed AI models to help reduce taxpayer compliance costs and improve the efficiency of the tax system. We use these models to prompt individuals completing their tax return online through myTax to help them get it right. The real-time prompts ask the taxpayer to check amounts they have entered for certain tax return labels. This is when the amounts don't match what we expect when compared to other taxpayers with similar attributes or amounts entered in previous years. The taxpayer can then review and amend any mistakes before lodging, getting their tax right from the start. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain._ ### Fraud detection We manage the myID digital platform, which provides an easy and secure way for individuals to prove their identity and access a range of government online services. We use AI to scan all myID accounts to identify and risk score the likelihood of digital identity theft (third-party fraud). We base this on a pre-defined range or parameter of inputs. The ranked results and drivers of the risk scores are provided to digital identify fraud investigators (ATO staff) for review. The investigators review the results, with a focus on those rated high risk. They then determine if a myID should be suspended. Investigators can view all results, not just those rated high risk. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, compliance and fraud detection domain._ ### Communications content We use AI tools for creative and video production activities. They help us edit and enhance content quality and automate manual tasks. We use AI tools to separate subjects from backgrounds, resize images, and apply consistent styles. They also help us resolve accessibility issues, including readability, colour contrast, and formats. AI helps us produce better communications content in less time and cost. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain_. QC103887 Print or Download
    60e9449
  2. substantive +868

    The ATO discloses AI use in law enforcement and intelligence and in image processing, commits to policy v2.0 and a standalone AI policy, and drops its claim that it doesn't use AI for administrative action.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # ATO AI transparency statement See our public transparency statement outlining how we approach artificial intelligence (AI) in the ATO. **Published** 28 February 2025 Print or Download ## How we define AI In the ATO, we use data and analytics (D&A), including automation and AI, and the insights they provide. D&A helps us administer the tax and superannuation systems more effectively. It enables us to tailor our services and make more informed decisions. It also makes it easier for taxpayers to comply and harder not to. We apply the [OECD definition of AIExternal Link](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles), in line with the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in governmentExternal Link](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). We also refer toinclude any application of machine learning, deep learning and generative AI as 'AI'. We don’t consider rules-based analytics, which are often if-then statements, to be AI. This form of analytics does not infer how to generate outputs from the inputs they receive. While AI and automation are sometimes combined to deliver outcomes, they are distinct capabilities. Automated processes can be implemented without the use of AI, and vice versa. ## Why we use AI in the ATO We use AI to assist our staff to more quickly process large volumes of complex data to identify insights and risks. The AI we use helps our staff make more informed decisions. It frees them to focus more on aspects of our work that require human judgment and empathy. We also use AI to ensure we can continue to protect the tax and superannuation systems from external fraud and cyber attacks. ### How we use AI in the ATO Based on the [classification system for AIExternal Link](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) in government, we are using AI in the: - usage patterns of analytics for insights, image processing, workplace productivity, and decision making and administrative action (note, we do not use AI for administrative action) - domains of service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, and corporate and enabling, and law enforcement, intelligence and security. **Examples** of how we are applying AI in these domains: - service delivery - providing real time prompts to taxpayers - sending payment reminders - powering our virtual assistant Alex - managing call centre volumes - assisting with readability and structure of select public advice and guidance content - compliance and fraud detection - reviewing large quantities of unstructured data - powering risk models to identify potential non-compliance or fraud for human review. - alert taxpayers to lodgments suspected of identity crime - corporate and enabling services - creating initial draft communications for review - summarising content - law enforcement, intelligence and security - supporting AI-enabled analysis of data for intelligence gathering. Under our AI policy, AI use is limited to approved tools used for approved use cases. We are currently expanding our use of enterprise generative AI systems to responsibly explore the benefits and risks of this emerging technology for workplace productivity use. See [Examples of how we use AI](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/ato-ai-transparency-statement#ExamplesofhowweuseAI). ## AI governance We recognise the importance of robust governance, oversight and accountability. This helps us to ensure AI development and use is ethical and safe and delivers fit for purpose outcomes. We take a measured and cautious approach when exploring AI tools and techniques. We closely monitor, and take appropriate action, if intended benefits are not being realised or unintended consequences are arising. We also actively identify and manage risks associated with all applications of AI. We only use AI in ways that maintain the security, privacy, transparency and ethical use of data. We always maintain appropriate human oversight. Our Chief Data Officer (CDO) oversees the development and use of data, analytics and insights. These support the administration of the tax and superannuation systems and government priorities. They deliver value for the Australian community. The CDO is also our AI Accountable Official under the _Policy for the responsible use of AI in government_. Our existing D&A (including data governance and [ethics](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/commitments-and-reporting/information-and-privacy/data-and-analytics/how-we-use-data-and-analytics#ato-Howweprotectyourdataandprivacy)) and IT policies already broadly apply to AI. We continue to evolve our data governance as our D&A maturity increases. We are, expanding our policies and guidance to reference AI more directly. Our approach adheres to all AI-related legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks, and all standard laws and frameworks. At time of publishing, the ATO is compliant with version 1.1 of the _AI in government policy_. Version 2.0 of the policy introduces new requirements from 15 December 2025, which we are committed to implementing. The ATO will soon release a standalone AI policy outlining specific obligations for staff when interacting with, using, or developing AI to support version 2.0 requirements. AI is evolving rapidly in an ever-changing technology environment. Therefore, we will continue to evaluate and change our data governance to ensure it remains fit for purpose. We will continue to train and develop our staff to ensure we use AI safely, responsibly and ethically. Decision making that adversely impacts taxpayers' rights will always be made by a human. Taxpayers have a [right of review](https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/your-tax-return/if-you-disagree-with-an-ato-decision) of our decisions. Their rights apply regardless of the technology we use to help us make those decisions. Australian Government agencies are required to publish a transparency statement outlining their approach to adopting and using artificial intelligence (AI). We will review our AI transparency statement regularly and publish updates on our website. If you have feedback on our AI transparency statement, you can [contact us](https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/contact-us/complaints-compliments-and-feedback/compliments-and-feedback). ## Examples of how we use AI The following examples show how we are using AI successfully to help get tax right from the start, reduce fraud and improve communications. ### Tax time nudging We have developed AI models to help reduce taxpayer compliance costs and improve the efficiency of the tax system. We use these models to prompt individuals completing their tax return online through myTax to help them get it right. The real-time prompts ask the taxpayer to check amounts they have entered for certain tax return labels. This is when the amounts don't match what we expect when compared to other taxpayers with similar attributes or amounts entered in previous years. The taxpayer can then review and amend any mistakes before lodging, getting their tax right from the start. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, service delivery domain_ ### Fraud detection We manage the myID digital platform, which provides an easy and secure way for individuals to prove their identity and access a range of government online services. We use AI to scan all myID accounts to identify and risk score the likelihood of digital identity theft (third-party fraud). We base this on a pre-defined range or parameter of inputs. The ranked results and drivers of the risk scores are provided to digital identify fraud investigators (ATO staff) for review. The investigators review the results, with a focus on those rated high risk. They then determine if a myID should be suspended. Investigators can view all results, not just those rated high risk. _Classification system for AI use: analytics for insights usage pattern, compliance and fraud detection domain_ ### Communications content We use AI tools for creative and video production activities. They help us edit and enhance content quality and automate manual tasks. We use AI tools to separate subjects from backgrounds, resize images, and apply consistent styles. They also help us resolve accessibility issues, including readability, colour contrast, and formats. AI helps us produce better communications content, in less time and cost. _Classification system for AI use: workplace productivity usage pattern, corporate and enabling domain_. QC103887 Print or Download
    0a7413b
  3. first tracked +7464

    First tracked version.

    b7e2a3d