DISR

Department of Industry, Science and Resources

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 3 changes of substance across 7 captures · last changed 26 Aug 2026

The story so far

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement itself says it was first published 28 Feb 2025.

  2. substantive Updates to policy version 2.0, adds a section on its responsibility for the Australian AI Safety Institute, and softens "a small number of AI tools".

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • New section disclosing the department is responsible for establishing the Australian AI Safety Institute, tied to the National AI Plan
    • References Policy for the responsible use of AI in government Version 2.0 instead of the 1 September 2024 commencement
    • Drops 'small number of AI tools' in favour of 'a number of AI tools'
    • Removed: hyperlinks to DTA guidance on accountable officials and transparency statements
    • Last updated date moved to 26 February 2026
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: v1 → v2
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-02-26 → 2026-02-26
    Show the words that changed ↓
  3. One cosmetic edit with no change of substance: Minor style edits: lower-cases "artificial intelligence" and "freedom of information", turns a bolded line into a heading, and trims a word.

  4. substantive Swaps the framework its own AI adoption follows, from the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Now aligns its AI adoption to the Guidance for AI Adoption (6 essential practices)
    • Removed: adherence to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard and its 10 guardrails
    • Softens wording from 'adheres to' to 'aligns to', and from what deployers 'must do' to transparency and accountability 'practices'
    • Last updated date moved to 7 April 2026
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Our adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails.
    • Added: New commitment (will): Our adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2026-02-26 → 2026-04-07
    Show the words that changed ↓
  5. substantive Rewrites the statement end to end: names a Chief AI Officer, discloses AI analysis of public consultation submissions, and softens its no-public-facing-AI commitment.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Appoints a Chief AI Officer (Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division) under the APS AI Plan
    • New disclosure: AI analyses submissions to the Consultation Hub, with privacy notice, consent and human review
    • Absolute commitment not to use AI where the public directly interacts or feels significant impact weakened to 'not currently' and 'without human review'
    • Adds detailed usage patterns (productivity, analytics, decision support) and domains (corporate, policy and legal, service delivery)
    • Adds risk and safeguard section citing Privacy, Archives and FOI Acts, plus monitoring and review
    • Adds National AI Centre; expands AI Safety Institute, noting frontier model testing in secure environments as a specialist AI use
    • Removed: bullet list of the staff AI use policy (ethics, FOI, records, privacy, roles and responsibilities)
    • Removed: link to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard; NAIC guidance and AI Ethics Principles links added
    • Removed: Domain dropped: compliance and fraud detection
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): We will continuously refine AI capabilities through centralised oversight and evaluation by the AIGC.
    • Added: Chief AI Officer: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: New commitment (human oversight): Consultation submission analysis: individuals informed, consent obtained, and all outputs reviewed and validated by a person.
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: none → with human review
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2026-04-07 → 2026-08-25
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The Department of Industry, Science and Resources says it uses approved AI tools to support staff with drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval across corporate, policy and service delivery work, plus specialist frontier-AI research and testing by Australia's AI Safety Institute. Governance rests with an AI Governance Committee, the Chief Information Officer as AI Accountable Official and a newly appointed Chief AI Officer, with staff reviewing all AI outputs and no AI decisions affecting people without human review. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Decision making and administrative action
  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Service delivery
  • Policy and legal
  • Corporate and enabling

Public-facing AI: yes, with human reviewcommits to a human intermediary

Safeguards named: human review of outputs, risk assessment, staff training, a governance body, an acceptable-use policy, privacy or security controls

Against the Standard 8/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Present:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Present:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Present:Compliance with the policy
  • Present:Compliance with legislation
  • Present:Date last updated
  • Present:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
in place (Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division)

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
25 Aug 2026
Last change we observed
26 Aug 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • will notWe do not use AI where the public directly interacts with or feels significant impact without a human agent.
  • human oversightStaff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts, not for decision-making.
  • human oversightConsultation submission analysis: individuals informed, consent obtained, and all outputs reviewed and validated by a person.
  • willWe will review at least every 12 months and update if our AI approach changes.
  • willOur adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.

The statement

How to read this

Artificial intelligence transparency statementAlso appears in 11 other agenciesADHAAFMACCACGCDAFFDCCEEWFWCHOUSEREPSIPAJSANZEA

Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI).

We use AI to support staff in their work. We do not use AI to make decisions that affect people or organisations without human oversight.

This statement explains how we use AI and the safeguards we have in place.

We review this statement at least annually and update it when our use of AI changes.

We use AI to support staff to work more effectively and efficiently, and to deliver better outcomes. Most departmental use supports internal business activities such as drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval.

Some areas of the department use AI for more technical purposes. For example, Australia’s AI Safety Institute has specialised AI uses it deploys as part of its remit. These include research and testing of frontier AI capabilities in secure environments to inform government on AI capabilities, risks and harms.

The department provides advice, delivers programs and makes decisions that can affect people and businesses. Staff remain responsible for decisions and advice. They review AI-generated content before it is used and treat AI outputs as drafts or starting points for further research – not for decision-making.

Our approach aligns with the Guidance for AI Adoption. This guidance sets out 6 essential practices for safe and responsible AI use. We also align with the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0). (Template language)

Across the department, we use approved AI tools for targeted purposes, including routine business tasks, information analysis and specialist technical work. This helps staff focus on more complex, high-value work.

Our role in supporting AI adoption in Australia

In addition to our internal use of AI, we support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across Australia. This national role is separate from how we use AI in departmental operations.

The National AI Centre (NAIC) supports practical adoption of AI across Australia’s economy, including businesses, not-for-profits and social enterprises. It provides guidance, tools and resources to help organisations understand where AI can add value and how to use it responsibly.

Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI)

Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI) researches, analyses and tests the capabilities of frontier AI models and applications, supports regulators and agencies to respond to existing and emerging risks and harms, and shapes safe AI development, deployment and international governance in Australia’s interests.

We use AI to improve how we deliver policy, information, services and outcomes for Australians.

  • increase efficiency and reduce manual effort
  • support evidence-based policy and decision making
  • improve consistency and quality across our work.

Our use of AI complements our broader role in supporting Australia’s adoption of AI across industry and the economy.

Our current approach focuses on keeping staff in control of AI-assisted work. AI supports tasks such as drafting, summarising, research and analysis, and information retrieval, but staff remain accountable for how they use these outputs.

  • a person reviews and validates AI-generated content
  • AI supports, but does not replace, human judgement
  • staff remain accountable for decisions and advice.

Our use of AI aligns with the Australian Government classification system. The system groups AI by:

  • how it is used (called ‘usage patterns’)
  • where it is used (called ‘domains’).

In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following ways:

We use AI to help staff complete routine tasks and manage information. This includes:

  • drafting and summarising documents
  • improving clarity and accessibility of content
  • organising and searching information.

We use AI to analyse information and generate insights. This includes:

  • identifying patterns and trends
  • analysing information to support policy development and advice
  • highlighting key themes and findings.
Decision making and administrative actionAlso appears in 3 other agenciesACMAOPCSERVICESAUSTRALIA

We use AI to support, not replace, human decision making. This includes:

  • reviewing and summarising information
  • preparing draft advice or recommendations for human consideration

These categories describe how we use AI across the department at a high level. Some specialist activities, including frontier AI research, measurement, testing and evaluation by Australia’s AI Safety Institute, may involve more technical uses of AI within these broader categories.

We use AI across different parts of the department. Some approved AI tools are available across multiple parts of the department. Others are limited to specific teams, functions or types of work.

In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following domains:

We use AI to support internal operations and corporate services. This includes communication, administration and workforce productivity.

We use AI to support policy analysis, briefing preparation, and advice to government.

We use AI to support the management and delivery of grants, programs and other departmental services.

Use of AI that affects the public

Members of the public do not currently interact directly with our AI systems. We do not use AI to make decisions or take actions that directly affect individuals or businesses without human review.

  • provides insights to support staff
  • is reviewed and validated by a person before it informs decisions or advice.

We use AI in limited cases to support consultation and engagement processes. For example, AI assists with analysing submissions received through our Consultation Hub, including identifying themes and insights for human review.

  • individuals are informed through the privacy collection statement
  • consent is obtained before AI is used
  • a person reviews and validates all outputs
  • AI supports analysis only and does not make decisions about individuals or businesses.

We will update this statement if our use of AI changes, including if AI directly interacts with the public.

We have governance arrangements to support the safe and responsible use of AI. These arrangements help us monitor, review and oversee AI use.

Our AI Governance Committee (AIGC) provides central oversight for AI use across the department. The committee is made up of senior departmental executives who:

  • ensure alignment with legislation, policy and best practice
  • identify and manage risks
  • support safe and responsible adoption.

Our Chief Information Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This role implements the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0) and ensures appropriate governance, oversight and risk management. (Template language)

We have appointed a Chief AI Officer in line with the APS AI Plan. This role provides strategic leadership for safe and effective AI adoption. The Chief AI Officer works with the accountable official to support appropriate safeguards. The role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division. (Template language)

Managing risks and safeguards

We assess new uses of AI before they are introduced. This includes considering risks and impacts. AI can produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased information. We manage these risks through governance, staff training and guidance, and human review of AI-generated content.

We also consider cyber security, privacy, records management and information access requirements when using AI. This includes our obligations under the Privacy Act 1988, Archives Act 1983 and Freedom of Information Act 1982.

We monitor how AI tools are used across the department. This includes whether they continue to meet business needs, staff feedback, and issues that may affect safe and effective use.

We review changes to government policy and updates to AI tools.

Where needed, we update guidance, safeguards and approved uses of AI.

We will update this statement when our use of AI changes.

We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently.

Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls __

Read NAIC's Guidance for AI Adoption __

Read Australia's AI Ethics Principles __

Statement text © Department of Industry, Science and Resources, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. substantive+5747

    Rewrites the statement end to end: names a Chief AI Officer, discloses AI analysis of public consultation submissions, and softens its no-public-facing-AI commitment.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 7 April25 August 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essWe use AI to support staff in their work. We do not use AI to make decisions that affect people or organisations without human oversight. This statement explains how we use AI and the safeguards we have in place. We review this statement at least annually and update it when our use of AI changes. ## Our use of AI We use AI to support staff to work more effectively and efficiently, and to deliver better outcomes. Most departmential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/node/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability practices for developers and deployers of AI systems. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Commuse supports internal business activities such as drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval. Some areas of the department use AI for more technical purposes. For example, Australia’s AI Safety Institute has specialised AI uses it deploys as part of its remit. These include research and testing of frontier AI capabilities in secure environments to inform government on AI capabilities, risks and harms. The department provides advice, delivers programs and makes decisions that can affect people and businesses. Staff remain responsible for decisions and advice. They review AI-generated content before it is used and treat AI outputs as drafts or starting points for further research – not for decision-making. Our approach aligns with the [Guidance for AI Adoption](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices/guidance-ai-adoption-implementation-guidance). This guidance sets out 6 essential practices for safe and responsible AI use. We also align with the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Across the department, we use approved AI tools for targeted purposes, including routine business tasks, information analysis and specialist technical work. This helps staff focus on more complex, high-value work. ## Our role in supporting AI adoption in Australia In addition to our internal use of AI, we support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across Australia. This national role is separate from how we use AI in departmental operations. ### National AI Centre (NAIC) The [National AI Centre (NAIC)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/national-ai-centre) supports practical adoption of AI across Australia’s economy, including businesses, not-for-profits and social enterprises. It provides guidance, tools and resources to help organisations understand where AI can add value and how to use it responsibly. ### Australia’s AI Safety Institutee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policSI) [Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-safety-institute) researches, analyses and tests the capabilities of frontier AI models and applications, supports regulators and agencies to respond to existing and emerging risks and harms, and shapes safe AI development, deployment and international governance in Australia’s interests. ## Why we use AI We use AI to improve how we deliver policy, information, services and outcomes for Australians. It helps us: - increase efficiency and reduce manual effort - support evidence-based policy and decision making - improve consistency and quality across our work. Our use of AI complements our broader role in supporting Australia’s adoption of AI across industry and the economy. ## How AI supports our work Our current approach focuses on keeping staff in control of AI-assisted work. AI supports tasks such as drafting, summarising, research and analysis, and information retrieval, but staff remain accountable for how they use these outputs. When we use AI: - a person reviews and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI relavalidates AI-generated content - AI supports, but does not replace, human judgement - staff remain accountable for decisions and advice. Our use of AI aligns with the [Australian Government classification system](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). The system groups AI by: - how it is used (called ‘usage patterns’) - where it is used (called ‘domains’). ### How we use AI In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following ways: #### Workplace productivity We use AI to help staff completed risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI acoutine tasks and manage information. This includes: - drafting and summarising documents - improving clarity and accessibility of countable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standardent - organising and searching information. #### Analytics and insights We use AI to analyse information and generate insights. This includes: - identifying patterns and trends - analysing information to support policy development and advice - highlighting key themes and findings. #### Decision making and administrative action We use AI to support, not replace, human decision making. This includes: - reviewing and summarising information - preparing draft advice or recommendations for human consideration - researching and analysing. These categories describe how we use AI across the department at a high level. Some specialist activities, including frontier AI research, measurement, testing and evaluation by Australia’s AI Safety Institute, may involve more technical uses of AI within these broader categories. ### Where we use AI We use AI across different parts of the department. Some approved AI tools are available across multiple parts of the department. Others are limited to specific teams, functions or types of work. In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following domains: #### Corporate and enabling We use AI to support internal operations and corporate services. This includes communication, administration and workforce productivity. #### Policy and legal We use AI to support policy analysis, briefing preparation, and advice to government. #### Service delivery We use AI to support the management and delivery of grants, programs and other departmental services. ## Use of AI that affects the public Members of the public do not currently interact directly with our AI systems. We do not use AI to make decisions or take actions that directly affect individuals or businesses without human review. Where we use AI, it: - provides insights to support staff - is reviewed and validated by a person before it informs decisions or advice. We use AI in limited cases to support consultation and engagement processes. For example, AI assists with analysing submissions received through our [Consultation Hub](https://consult.industry.gov.au/), including identifying themes and insights for human review. In these cases: - individuals are informed through the privacy collection statement - consent is obtained before AI is used - a person reviews and validates all outputs - AI supports analysis only and does not make decisions about individuals or businesses. We will update this statement if our use of AI changes, including if AI directly interacts with the public. ## Governance and oversight We have governance arrangements to support the safe and responsible use of AI. These arrangements help us monitor, review and oversee AI use. ### AI Governance Committee Our AI Governance Committee (AIGC) provides central oversight for AI use across the department. The committee is made up of senior departmental executives who: - oversee how we use AI - ensure alignment with legislation, policy and best practice - identify and manage risks - support safe and responsible adoption. ### AI Accountable Official Our Chief Information Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This role implements the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensures appropriate governance, oversight and risk management. ### Chief AI Officer We have appointed a Chief AI Officer in line with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). This role provides strategic leadership for safe and effective AI adoption. The Chief AI Officer works with the accountable official to support appropriate safeguards. The role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division. ## Managing risks and safeguards We assess new uses of AI before they are introduced. This includes considering risks and impacts. AI can produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased information. We manage these risks through governance, staff training and guidance, and human review of AI-generated content. We also consider cyber security, privacy, records management and information access requirements when using AI. This includes our obligations under the [Privacy Act 1988](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), [Archives Act 1983](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02796/latest/text) and [Freedom of Information Act 1982](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02562/latest/text). ## Monitoring and review We monitor how AI tools are used across the department. This includes whether they continue to meet business needs, staff feedback, and issues that may affect safe and effective use. We review changes to government policy and updates to AI tools. Where needed, we update guidance, safeguards and approved uses of AI. We will update this statement when our use of AI changes. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read NAIC's Guidance for AI Adoption \_\_](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices) [Read Australia's AI Ethics Principles \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    a7bb87a
  2. links only-27
    View diff
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 7 April 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoptionnode/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability practices for developers and deployers of AI systems. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    dc8eebf
  3. substantive-16

    Swaps the framework its own AI adoption follows, from the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February7 April 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adhereligns to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrailGuidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability requirements and explain whatpractices for developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    c23aaa0
  4. cosmetic-6

    Minor style edits: lower-cases "artificial intelligence" and "freedom of information", turns a bolded line into a heading, and trims a word.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 2026 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Aartificial Iintelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Ffreedom of Iinformation considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **## Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    ecb63ae
  5. substantive+437

    Updates to policy version 2.0, adds a section on its responsibility for the Australian AI Safety Institute, and softens "a small number of AI tools".

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 20256 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) came into effect on 1 September 2024. It has a set ofsets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials) and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI We use a smallOur approach uses a number of AI tools and functions to improto deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    c6ef5b8
  6. scrape noise-172

    No change by the agency; only breadcrumb navigation and an "On this page" heading from the site template dropped out of the capture.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    1. [Home](https://www.industry.gov.au/) / 1. [Publications](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications) / 1. Artificial intelligence transparency statement # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 2025 ### Share \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement&quote=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement) - [\_\_X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?text=Artificial%20intelligence%20transparency%20statement&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) ## On this page Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) came into effect on 1 September 2024. It has a set of requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials) and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI We use a small number of AI tools and functions to improve efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    9226d49
  7. first tracked+5083

    First tracked revision.

    07278a5