DISR

Department of Industry, Science and Resources

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 3 changes of substance across 7 versions · last changed 26 Aug 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement says it was first published 28 Feb 2025.

  2. substantive The department discloses that it is responsible for the new Australian AI Safety Institute. It also cites version 2.0 of the policy and moves its updated date to February 2026.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Added: the department is responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, which is being set up under the National AI Plan to monitor and test frontier AI
    • Now cites version 2.0 of the DTA policy and drops the 1 September 2024 commencement date
    • AI use described as 'a number of AI tools' instead of 'a small number'
    • Date updated changed from 26 February 2025 to 26 February 2026
    • Removed: links to the DTA guidance on accountable officials and transparency statements
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: v1 → v2
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-02-26 → 2026-02-26
    Show the words that changed ↓
  3. One cosmetic edit : Tidies capitalisation, turns a bold label into a proper heading for the Australian AI Safety Institute section and trims one word; nothing of substance changes.

  4. substantive Replaces its claim to adhere to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails with alignment to the newer Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Now says its AI use aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption (6 essential practices)
    • Removed: claim that its AI adoption adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails
    • Wording softened from 'adheres to' to 'aligns to'
    • Date updated changed from 26 February 2026 to 7 April 2026
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Own AI adoption adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails
    • Added: New commitment (will): Own AI adoption aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2026-02-26 → 2026-04-07
    Show the words that changed ↓
  5. substantive Rewrites its statement in full, naming a Chief AI Officer, disclosing AI analysis of Consultation Hub submissions, and softening its pledge to keep AI away from public-facing impacts.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Chief AI Officer appointed under the APS AI Plan; the role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division
    • New disclosure: AI helps analyse public submissions received through the Consultation Hub, with notice in the privacy collection statement, consent obtained and human review of outputs
    • Removed: the commitment not to use AI wherever the public directly interacts with it or feels a significant impact from it without a human agent. It is replaced by the narrower statement that the public does not currently interact with its AI and that decisions get human review
    • Removed: 'compliance and fraud detection' from the domains where AI is used
    • New disclosure: Australia's AI Safety Institute uses specialised AI to research and test frontier models in secure environments
    • Removed: the list of what the staff AI policy covers (acceptable use, ethics, FOI, record keeping, privacy, roles)
    • New section on assessing risks before introducing an AI use, citing the Privacy, Archives and FOI Acts
    • New monitoring and review commitments; the annual review of the statement is kept
    • AI Governance Committee now described as made up of senior executives
    • New section on the National AI Centre's national role
    • Link to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard swapped for Guidance for AI Adoption and the AI Ethics Principles
    • Removed: Domain dropped: compliance and fraud detection
    • Removed: Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
    • Added: Chief AI Officer: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: New commitment (will): Assess new uses of AI, including risks and impacts, before they are introduced
    • Added: New commitment (will): Inform individuals and obtain consent before using AI to analyse consultation submissions
    • Added: Safeguard added: privacy or security controls
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2026-04-07 → 2026-08-25
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The Department of Industry, Science and Resources says it uses approved AI tools to help staff with drafting, analysis, information retrieval and decision support, with every output reviewed by a person. It uses AI to analyse consultation submissions only with consent and human review. Its AI use is overseen by an AI Governance Committee, with the Chief Information Officer as accountable official and a newly appointed Chief AI Officer. The department says its approach aligns with the Guidance for AI Adoption and version 2.0 of the DTA policy. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Decision making and administrative action
  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Service delivery
  • Policy and legal
  • Corporate and enabling

Public-facing AI: yes, with human review commits to a human intermediary

Safeguards named: a governance body, human review of outputs, staff training, risk assessment, testing or evaluation, privacy or security controls

The Standard’s eight elements 8 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
in place (Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division)

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
25 Aug 2026
Last change we saw
26 Aug 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • will not Do not use AI where the public directly interacts with or feels significant impact without a human agent
  • human oversight Staff review all AI tool outputs as drafts or starting points, not for decision-making
  • will Own AI adoption aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices
  • will Centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AI Governance Committee
  • will Review statement at least every 12 months and update if AI approach changes or accuracy affected
  • will Inform individuals and obtain consent before using AI to analyse consultation submissions
  • will Assess new uses of AI, including risks and impacts, before they are introduced

The statement

How to read this

Artificial intelligence transparency statement Also appears in 11 other agencies ADHA AFMA CCA CGC DAFF DCCEEW FWC HOUSEREPS JSA NZEA OTA

Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI).

We use AI to support staff in their work. We do not use AI to make decisions that affect people or organisations without human oversight.

This statement explains how we use AI and the safeguards we have in place.

We review this statement at least annually and update it when our use of AI changes.

We use AI to support staff to work more effectively and efficiently, and to deliver better outcomes. Most departmental use supports internal business activities such as drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval.

Some areas of the department use AI for more technical purposes. For example, Australia’s AI Safety Institute has specialised AI uses it deploys as part of its remit. These include research and testing of frontier AI capabilities in secure environments to inform government on AI capabilities, risks and harms.

The department provides advice, delivers programs and makes decisions that can affect people and businesses. Staff remain responsible for decisions and advice. They review AI-generated content before it is used and treat AI outputs as drafts or starting points for further research – not for decision-making.

Our approach aligns with the Guidance for AI Adoption. This guidance sets out 6 essential practices for safe and responsible AI use. We also align with the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0). (Template language)

Across the department, we use approved AI tools for targeted purposes, including routine business tasks, information analysis and specialist technical work. This helps staff focus on more complex, high-value work.

Our role in supporting AI adoption in Australia

In addition to our internal use of AI, we support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across Australia. This national role is separate from how we use AI in departmental operations.

The National AI Centre (NAIC) supports practical adoption of AI across Australia’s economy, including businesses, not-for-profits and social enterprises. It provides guidance, tools and resources to help organisations understand where AI can add value and how to use it responsibly.

Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI)

Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI) researches, analyses and tests the capabilities of frontier AI models and applications, supports regulators and agencies to respond to existing and emerging risks and harms, and shapes safe AI development, deployment and international governance in Australia’s interests.

We use AI to improve how we deliver policy, information, services and outcomes for Australians.

  • increase efficiency and reduce manual effort
  • support evidence-based policy and decision making
  • improve consistency and quality across our work.

Our use of AI complements our broader role in supporting Australia’s adoption of AI across industry and the economy.

Our current approach focuses on keeping staff in control of AI-assisted work. AI supports tasks such as drafting, summarising, research and analysis, and information retrieval, but staff remain accountable for how they use these outputs.

  • a person reviews and validates AI-generated content
  • AI supports, but does not replace, human judgement
  • staff remain accountable for decisions and advice.

Our use of AI aligns with the Australian Government classification system. The system groups AI by:

  • how it is used (called ‘usage patterns’)
  • where it is used (called ‘domains’).

In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following ways:

We use AI to help staff complete routine tasks and manage information. This includes:

  • drafting and summarising documents
  • improving clarity and accessibility of content
  • organising and searching information.

We use AI to analyse information and generate insights. This includes:

  • identifying patterns and trends
  • analysing information to support policy development and advice
  • highlighting key themes and findings.
Decision making and administrative action Also appears in 4 other agencies ACMA ACQSC OPC SERVICESAUSTRALIA

We use AI to support, not replace, human decision making. This includes:

  • reviewing and summarising information
  • preparing draft advice or recommendations for human consideration

These categories describe how we use AI across the department at a high level. Some specialist activities, including frontier AI research, measurement, testing and evaluation by Australia’s AI Safety Institute, may involve more technical uses of AI within these broader categories.

We use AI across different parts of the department. Some approved AI tools are available across multiple parts of the department. Others are limited to specific teams, functions or types of work.

In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following domains:

We use AI to support internal operations and corporate services. This includes communication, administration and workforce productivity.

We use AI to support policy analysis, briefing preparation, and advice to government.

We use AI to support the management and delivery of grants, programs and other departmental services.

Use of AI that affects the public

Members of the public do not currently interact directly with our AI systems. We do not use AI to make decisions or take actions that directly affect individuals or businesses without human review.

  • provides insights to support staff
  • is reviewed and validated by a person before it informs decisions or advice.

We use AI in limited cases to support consultation and engagement processes. For example, AI assists with analysing submissions received through our Consultation Hub, including identifying themes and insights for human review.

  • individuals are informed through the privacy collection statement
  • consent is obtained before AI is used
  • a person reviews and validates all outputs
  • AI supports analysis only and does not make decisions about individuals or businesses.

We will update this statement if our use of AI changes, including if AI directly interacts with the public.

We have governance arrangements to support the safe and responsible use of AI. These arrangements help us monitor, review and oversee AI use.

Our AI Governance Committee (AIGC) provides central oversight for AI use across the department. The committee is made up of senior departmental executives who:

  • ensure alignment with legislation, policy and best practice
  • identify and manage risks
  • support safe and responsible adoption.

Our Chief Information Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This role implements the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0) and ensures appropriate governance, oversight and risk management. (Template language)

We have appointed a Chief AI Officer in line with the APS AI Plan. This role provides strategic leadership for safe and effective AI adoption. The Chief AI Officer works with the accountable official to support appropriate safeguards. The role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division. (Template language)

Managing risks and safeguards

We assess new uses of AI before they are introduced. This includes considering risks and impacts. AI can produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased information. We manage these risks through governance, staff training and guidance, and human review of AI-generated content.

We also consider cyber security, privacy, records management and information access requirements when using AI. This includes our obligations under the Privacy Act 1988, Archives Act 1983 and Freedom of Information Act 1982.

We monitor how AI tools are used across the department. This includes whether they continue to meet business needs, staff feedback, and issues that may affect safe and effective use.

We review changes to government policy and updates to AI tools.

Where needed, we update guidance, safeguards and approved uses of AI.

We will update this statement when our use of AI changes.

We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently.

Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls __

Read NAIC's Guidance for AI Adoption __

Read Australia's AI Ethics Principles __

Statement text © Department of Industry, Science and Resources. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. substantive +5747

    Rewrites its statement in full, naming a Chief AI Officer, disclosing AI analysis of Consultation Hub submissions, and softening its pledge to keep AI away from public-facing impacts.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 7 April25 August 2026 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essWe use AI to support staff in their work. We do not use AI to make decisions that affect people or organisations without human oversight. This statement explains how we use AI and the safeguards we have in place. We review this statement at least annually and update it when our use of AI changes. ## Our use of AI We use AI to support staff to work more effectively and efficiently, and to deliver better outcomes. Most departmential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/node/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability practices for developers and deployers of AI systems. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Commuse supports internal business activities such as drafting, summarising, analysis and information retrieval. Some areas of the department use AI for more technical purposes. For example, Australia’s AI Safety Institute has specialised AI uses it deploys as part of its remit. These include research and testing of frontier AI capabilities in secure environments to inform government on AI capabilities, risks and harms. The department provides advice, delivers programs and makes decisions that can affect people and businesses. Staff remain responsible for decisions and advice. They review AI-generated content before it is used and treat AI outputs as drafts or starting points for further research – not for decision-making. Our approach aligns with the [Guidance for AI Adoption](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices/guidance-ai-adoption-implementation-guidance). This guidance sets out 6 essential practices for safe and responsible AI use. We also align with the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Across the department, we use approved AI tools for targeted purposes, including routine business tasks, information analysis and specialist technical work. This helps staff focus on more complex, high-value work. ## Our role in supporting AI adoption in Australia In addition to our internal use of AI, we support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across Australia. This national role is separate from how we use AI in departmental operations. ### National AI Centre (NAIC) The [National AI Centre (NAIC)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/national-ai-centre) supports practical adoption of AI across Australia’s economy, including businesses, not-for-profits and social enterprises. It provides guidance, tools and resources to help organisations understand where AI can add value and how to use it responsibly. ### Australia’s AI Safety Institutee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policSI) [Australia’s AI Safety Institute (AISI)](https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-safety-institute) researches, analyses and tests the capabilities of frontier AI models and applications, supports regulators and agencies to respond to existing and emerging risks and harms, and shapes safe AI development, deployment and international governance in Australia’s interests. ## Why we use AI We use AI to improve how we deliver policy, information, services and outcomes for Australians. It helps us: - increase efficiency and reduce manual effort - support evidence-based policy and decision making - improve consistency and quality across our work. Our use of AI complements our broader role in supporting Australia’s adoption of AI across industry and the economy. ## How AI supports our work Our current approach focuses on keeping staff in control of AI-assisted work. AI supports tasks such as drafting, summarising, research and analysis, and information retrieval, but staff remain accountable for how they use these outputs. When we use AI: - a person reviews and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI relavalidates AI-generated content - AI supports, but does not replace, human judgement - staff remain accountable for decisions and advice. Our use of AI aligns with the [Australian Government classification system](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). The system groups AI by: - how it is used (called ‘usage patterns’) - where it is used (called ‘domains’). ### How we use AI In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following ways: #### Workplace productivity We use AI to help staff completed risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI acoutine tasks and manage information. This includes: - drafting and summarising documents - improving clarity and accessibility of countable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage pattent - organising and searching information. #### Analytics and insights We use AI to analyse information and generate insights. This includes: - identifying patterns and trends - analysing information to support policy development and advice - highlighting key themes and findings. #### Decision making and administrative action We use AI to support, not replace, human decision making. This includes: - reviewing and summarising information - preparing draft advice or recommendations for human consideration - researching and analysing. These categories describe how we use AI across the department at a high level. Some specialist activities, including frontier AI research, measurement, testing and evaluation by Australia’s AI Safety Institute, may involve more technical uses of AI within these broader categories. ### Where we use AI We use AI across different parts of the department. Some approved AI tools are available across multiple parts of the department. Otherns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-re limited to specific teams, functions or types of work. In line with the Australian Government classification system, we use AI in the following domaking and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improvings: #### Corporate and enabling We use AI to support internal operations and corporate services. This includes communication, administration and workplaforce productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard. #### Policy and legal We use AI to support policy analysis, briefing preparation, and advice to government. #### Service delivery We use AI to support the management and delivery of grants, programs and other departmental services. ## Use of AI that affects the public Members of the public do not currently interact directly with our AI systems. We do not use AI to make decisions or take actions that directly affect individuals or businesses without human review. Where we use AI, it: - provides insights to support staff - is reviewed and validated by a person before it informs decisions or advice. We use AI in limited cases to support consultation and engagement processes. For example, AI assists with analysing submissions received through our [Consultation Hub](https://consult.industry.gov.au/), including identifying themes and insights for human review. In these cases: - individuals are informed through the privacy collection statement - consent is obtained before AI is used - a person reviews and validates all outputs - AI supports analysis only and does not make decisions about individuals or businesses. We will update this statement if our use of AI changes, including if AI directly interacts with the public. ## Governance and oversight We have governance arrangements to support the safe and responsible use of AI. These arrangements help us monitor, review and oversee AI use. ### AI Governance Committee Our AI Governance Committee (AIGC) provides central oversight for AI use across the department. The committee is made up of senior departmental executives who: - oversee how we use AI - ensure alignment with legislation, policy and best practice - identify and manage risks - support safe and responsible adoption. ### AI Accountable Official Our Chief Information Officer is the AI Accountable Official. This role implements the [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensures appropriate governance, oversight and risk management. ### Chief AI Officer We have appointed a Chief AI Officer in line with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). This role provides strategic leadership for safe and effective AI adoption. The Chief AI Officer works with the accountable official to support appropriate safeguards. The role is held by the Head of Technology and Digital Policy Division. ## Managing risks and safeguards We assess new uses of AI before they are introduced. This includes considering risks and impacts. AI can produce inaccurate, incomplete or biased information. We manage these risks through governance, staff training and guidance, and human review of AI-generated content. We also consider cyber security, privacy, records management and information access requirements when using AI. This includes our obligations under the [Privacy Act 1988](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03712/latest/text), [Archives Act 1983](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02796/latest/text) and [Freedom of Information Act 1982](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02562/latest/text). ## Monitoring and review We monitor how AI tools are used across the department. This includes whether they continue to meet business needs, staff feedback, and issues that may affect safe and effective use. We review changes to government policy and updates to AI tools. Where needed, we update guidance, safeguards and approved uses of AI. We will update this statement when our use of AI changes. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI safely, responsibly and transparently. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read NAIC's Guidance for AI Adoption \_\_](https://www.ai.gov.au/staying-safe-and-responsible/essential-ai-practices) [Read Australia's AI Ethics Principles \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    e1fe69f
  2. noise -27
    The words that changed
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 7 April 2026 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI aligns to the Guidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoptionnode/95254 "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability practices for developers and deployers of AI systems. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    b7f7d50
  3. substantive -16

    Replaces its claim to adhere to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails with alignment to the newer Guidance for AI Adoption's 6 essential practices.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February7 April 2026 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adhereligns to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrailGuidance for AI Adoption, which consists of [6 essential practices](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption "Guidance for AI Adoption") for industry to adopt AI responsibly. This includes transparency and accountability requirements and explain whatpractices for developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - freedom of information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Australian AI Safety Institute We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    e4ffa3d
  4. cosmetic -6

    Tidies capitalisation, turns a bold label into a proper heading for the Australian AI Safety Institute section and trims one word; nothing of substance changes.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 2026 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Aartificial Iintelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) sets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about accountable officials and transparency statements. This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI Our approach uses a number of AI tools to deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Ffreedom of Iinformation considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **## Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    2ab0243
  5. substantive +437

    The department discloses that it is responsible for the new Australian AI Safety Institute. It also cites version 2.0 of the policy and moves its updated date to February 2026.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 20256 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (Version 2.0)](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) came into effect on 1 September 2024. It has a set ofsets the requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials) and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI We use a smallOur approach uses a number of AI tools and functions to improto deliver efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. **Australian AI Safety Institute** We are responsible for the Australian AI Safety Institute, a key action to achieve the goals set out in the [National AI Plan](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan "National AI Plan"). The institute is being established to monitor and test frontier AI technologies and share insights on emerging capabilities and risks. It will also support ministers, agencies and regulators to protect people and businesses in relation to AI safety issues by sharing information, connecting relevant bodies and facilitating understanding of emerging AI risks. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    05950e9
  6. noise -155

    Nothing in the statement changed. The page's breadcrumb navigation (Home / Publications) stopped appearing in the capture.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    1. [Home](https://www.industry.gov.au/) / 1. [Publications](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications) / 1. Artificial intelligence transparency statement # Artificial intelligence transparency statement Date published: 28 February 2025 Date updated: 26 February 2025 \[\_\_Share this page\](javascript:;) - [\_\_Email](mailto:?body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.industry.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fartificial-intelligence-transparency-statement) ### Topics - [Corporate](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?pub-topic=2906) ### Publisher - [Department of Industry, Science and Resources](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications?publisher=3026) Our department is supporting Australia to become a leader in developing and adopting trusted, secure and responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our own adoption of AI adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard, which consists of [10 voluntary guardrails.](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard/10-guardrails) These guardrails include transparency and accountability requirements and explain what developers and deployers of AI systems must do to achieve them. The Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) came into effect on 1 September 2024. It has a set of requirements for Australian Government agencies to engage with AI in a safe and responsible way. The policy has mandatory requirements about [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials) and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). This statement details our implementation of the policy requirements. ## Governance In January 2024, we formed an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) to have central oversight for AI use in the department. The committee’s members represent a range of perspectives from across the department and have involvement in developing AI policy or projects. The AIGC ensures: - we find ways to use AI to improve efficiency, capability and innovate - appropriate governance of AI use and adherence with relevant legislation, policies and best practice - opportunities involving the use of AI are considered, safe and responsible - we identify and address all potential AI related risks - appropriate training and usage policies are available. ## AI accountable official Our Chief Information Officer is the accountable official responsible for carrying out the policy. The AIGC supports the accountable official. ## How we use AI We use a small number of AI tools and functions to improve efficiencies and augment processes. These help staff focus on more complex and meaningful work. The AIGC maintains visibility of AI use and classifies AI use according to the following [usage patterns and domains](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification): - **Usage patterns** : supporting human decision-making and administrative action, giving insights through analytics and improving workplace productivity so staff can focus on more complex work. - **Domains** : service delivery, compliance and fraud detection, policy and legal, and corporate and enabling domains. We have a policy that guides all staff on: - acceptable use of AI in our department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information considerations - record keeping - privacy - roles and responsibilities when using AI. We do not use AI in any instance where the public directly interacts with or feels a significant impact from AI without a human agent. Staff review all AI tool outputs and treat them as drafts or starting points for further research, not for decision-making. ## Our commitment We will continuously refine and enhance our AI capabilities. We do this by ensuring centralised oversight and evaluation of AI tools through the AIGC. This statement will evolve to align with technology changes, legislation, policy and governance best practices. We will review at least every 12 months and update it if our AI approach changes, or if anything materially impacts its accuracy. ## More information [Learn more about our corporate governance and integrity controls \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/corporate-governance) [Read the Voluntary AI Safety Standard \_\_](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/voluntary-ai-safety-standard) ## Contact us \_\_ Email [info@industry.gov.au](mailto:info@industry.gov.au)
    8b08194
  7. first tracked +4469

    First tracked version.

    b7e2a3d