ASIO

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation

Tracked since 7 June 2026 · 0 changes of substance across 1 capture

The story so far

How to read this
  1. First captured by the tracker.

  2. No change of substance since tracking began.

What the statement says

How to read this

ASIO describes itself as a human-led, data-driven, technology-enabled organisation and sets out seven ethical AI principles (human-led, data-driven, considered, accountable, responsive, security-conscious, compliant and responsible) governing its use of AI, alongside an internal Automation and AI Policy. It gives no classification of specific use cases, saying only that AI supports human decision making with humans accountable, especially for decisions significantly affecting an individual. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

No use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain.

Public-facing AI: unclear

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, incident or concern reporting, testing or evaluation, privacy or security controls, an acceptable-use policy

Against the Standard 5/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Missing:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Present:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Missing:Compliance with the policy
  • Present:Compliance with legislation
  • Present:Date last updated
  • Missing:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
not mentioned
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
not mentioned
Policy version referenced
not referenced

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
not stated
Says it was last updated
19 Feb 2026
Last change we observed
none since tracking began
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • human oversightHumans are ultimately accountable for decision making; AI use includes appropriate human involvement per use-case
  • willEvaluate accuracy and limitations of AI models and whether an AI solution is appropriate
  • willMinimise biases in AI through technical design and data usage where possible
  • willRecognise and act to minimise individual, societal, reputational or operational harms from AI
  • willCommunicate proper usage and limitations of AI capabilities to users; maintain checks and balances
  • willMonitor AI use as use-cases emerge or evolve; empower officers to highlight perceived issues
  • willSecurity classify and handle data and AI models appropriately
  • willComply with relevant legislation and codes of practice, and consider whether we should, not just whether we can
  • willStrive for transparency in development, deployment and reporting of AI capabilities

The statement

How to read this

ASIO is a human-led, data-driven, technology-enabled organisation committed to transparency wherever possible. ASIO's transparency statement, reviewed 19 February 2026, outlines our approach to AI, our principles, and commitment to accountability and oversight.

[ ASIO transparency statement - agency use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).pdf ](https://www.asio.gov.au/system/files/2026-02/ASIO%20transparency%20statement%20-%20agency%20use%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%28AI%29.pdf)

ASIO's Automation and Artificial Intelligence Policy outlines how ASIO will interact with Automation and AI and demonstrates our commitment to doing what is legal and doing what is right.

Our AI ethical principles guide our approach to capability development and our work using AI and its outputs. The principles ensure ethical considerations underpin ASIO's use of AI and are applied by all involved from development to implementation. They ensure an appropriate level of human involvement and acknowledge humans are accountable for decision making.

Our use of AI supports human decision making. While we find ourselves required to delegate some routine, large-scale tasks to AI due to increasing volumes of data, we ensure that ultimately humans are accountable for decision making and that the use of AI includes an appropriate level of human involvement for the particular use-case. This is especially relevant in the case of decisions significantly affecting an individual.

We actively endeavour to evaluate the accuracy and limitations of AI models and determine whether an AI solution is appropriate for a given problem. We strive to understand, and where possible minimise through technical design and data usage, the biases inherently present in all AI.

We seek to recognise harms that may arise from the use of AI and act to minimise those harms whether they be individual or societal, reputational or operational. We balance potential risks and costs of using AI against both the benefits of AI and the risks associated with not using AI.

We clearly and actively communicate information on proper usage and limitations of AI capabilities to users. Responsibility for proper use of AI is clearly articulated and a system of checks and balances is in place guiding use where appropriate to ensure our actions are reasonable, fair and proportionate.

The use of AI is monitored as use-cases emerge or evolve over time—officers should be empowered to highlight any perceived issues with the use of AI. Where appropriate, systems are updated to ensure the use of AI continues to meet its intended purpose.

Data and AI models are security classified and handled appropriately. This includes considering the potential for compromise of our capabilities arising from improper classification or sharing of data and AI models which is balanced against the need for the transparency afforded by a lower classification where appropriate.

ASIO's use of AI complies with relevant legislation and codes of practice. Further, our use of AI and the data that support it considers not just whether we can do something (because the action is lawful) but whether we should do it—our use of AI must be respectful of the values of our democratic society as well as upholding ASIO values. We strive for transparency in the development, deployment and reporting of AI capabilities, to ensure we maintain our licence to operate.

Statement text © Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. first tracked+3832

    First tracked revision.

    9ff8360