AUASB

Auditing and Assurance Standards Board

Tracked since 7 June 2026 · 1 change of substance across 2 captures · last changed 14 Aug 2026

The story so far

How to read this
  1. First captured by the tracker.

  2. substantive Adds the Chief Operating Officer to the list of accountable officials responsible for AI obligations, alongside the Managing Director and Business Services Manager.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Chief Operating Officer added as an accountable official for AI compliance
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The AASB–AUASB says it uses AI for analytics for insights and workplace productivity across research, corporate and policy functions, including Microsoft 365 Copilot for all staff. All AI systems are listed in an internal AI Register, undergo risk–benefit assessment and bias testing with human-in-the-loop oversight, and it does not propose public-facing AI without a human intermediary. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Policy and legal
  • Scientific
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot

Public-facing AI: nonecommits to a human intermediary

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, audit or assurance, use-case register, testing or evaluation, an acceptable-use policy

Against the Standard 8/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Present:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Present:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Present:Compliance with the policy
  • Present:Compliance with legislation
  • Present:Date last updated
  • Present:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
AASB-AUASB Managing Director, Chief Operating Officer and Business Services Manager
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
in place
Staff training
not mentioned
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
3 Dec 2025
Last change we observed
14 Aug 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • will notDo not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted without human intermediary
  • human oversightBias testing, human-in-the-loop oversight and mechanisms to contest decisions are in place
  • willAll AI systems undergo a risk-benefit assessment before entering production
  • willMonitor deployed AI systems ongoing, with periodic reassessment or when triggered by significant changes
  • willRecord all AI systems in our internal AI Register
  • willReview and update this statement at least every 12 months and if approach changes significantly
  • willOnly use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies
  • willMaintain an internal AI use policy applying to all employees and contractors

The statement

How to read this

Contact [image: Linked In] [image: Twitter]

Australian Government Auditing and Assurance Standards Board

Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statementAlso appears in 18 other agenciesAASBACIARAFPAFSAARPCBOMDFATDSSDVAEDUCATIONFINANCEHSRANAANLAPCPSRSIATEQSA

This statement is published by the AASB and AUASB in accordance with requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for responsible use of AI in government.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

Consistent with the DTA policy we have applied the following definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD):Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBPC

“An AI system is a machine‑based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”Also appears in 16 other agenciesAASBACCCACMAACQSCAERAFSAAICAIFSARPANSAARTASSEAAUSTRADEBOMCERFWCPC

Our approach to AI adoption and useAlso appears in 3 other agenciesAASBAPSCPC

We are adopting and utilising AI in a manner that enhances and supports our work while ensuring its safe, ethical and responsible use. We are doing so within existing frameworks and legislation relevant to Australian Government use of AI, including those relating to:Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

  • the AASB – AUASB Code of ConductAlso appears in 1 other agencyAASB
  • the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of ConductAlso appears in 1 other agencyAASB

All AI systems are recorded in our internal AI Register , which tracks purpose, risk classification, monitoring activities and audit evidence.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

In accordance with the DTA Classification system for AI use, we may use AI as follows:Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBPC

  • Analytics for insights – to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting tools.Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBPC
  • Workplace Productivity – to automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication.Also appears in 2 other agenciesAASBPC
  • Research – to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes, and enhance review and evaluation processes.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB
  • Corporate and****policy – to support corporate and policy functions by evaluating the usefulness and effectiveness to improve operational efficiency.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

In 2025, AASB and AUASB, following the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service (Microsoft 365 Copilot), made the product available to all staff.

We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with—or be significantly impacted by–it without a human intermediary or interventionAlso appears in 2 other agenciesAASBPC

We maintain an internal policy on the use of AI, which applies to all employees and contractors. It is consistent with and supports the provisions of DTA policy and guidance and will be reviewed and updated to ensure it remains so.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

All AI systems undergo a risk‑benefit assessment before entering production. We monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems on an ongoing basis and subsequent reassessments are conducted periodically or when triggered by significant changes such as model updates, new data sources, or incidents.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

Bias testing, human‑in‑the‑loop oversight, and mechanisms for stakeholders to contest decisions are also in place to protect against negative impacts as appropriate to the usage pattern.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies, including the AASB – AUASB Code of Conduct, APS Values, data governance, privacy, cyber security and the Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

AASB‑AUASB Managing Director, Chief Operating Officer and Business Services Manager are the accountable officials responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

This transparency statement will be reviewed and updated if our approach to the use of AI changes significantly, and at least every 12 months. It is published on the AASB website and can be accessed from the main menu under “AI Transparency.”Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

If you have any questions about this statement, please contact [email protected].Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

Click here to view pdf version of AI Transparency Statement.Also appears in 1 other agencyAASB

Statement text © Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. substantive+14

    Adds the Chief Operating Officer to the list of accountable officials responsible for AI obligations, alongside the Managing Director and Business Services Manager.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    [Contact](https://www.auasb.gov.au/contact/) [![Linked In](https://www.auasb.gov.au/media/hgekxpji/linkedin.svg)](https://www.linkedin.com/company/1144936/) [![Twitter](https://www.auasb.gov.au/media/50uhn0j3/twitter.svg)](https://twitter.com/auasbaus) [ ![](https://www.auasb.gov.au/media/zz0anaqr/aus-gov-logo.png) Australian Government Auditing and Assurance Standards Board ](https://www.auasb.gov.au/) # Artificial Intelligence (AI) transparency statement Updated 3 December 2025 This statement is published by the AASB and AUASB in accordance with requirements set out in the Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy). Consistent with the DTA policy we have applied the following definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD): _“An AI system is a machine‑based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.”_ ## **Our approach to AI adoption and use** We are adopting and utilising AI in a manner that enhances and supports our work while ensuring its safe, ethical and responsible use. We are doing so within existing frameworks and legislation relevant to Australian Government use of AI, including those relating to: - the AASB – AUASB Code of Conduct - the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct - data governance - privacy and - cyber security. All AI systems are recorded in our internal **AI Register** , which tracks purpose, risk classification, monitoring activities and audit evidence. ## **How we use AI** In accordance with the DTA Classification system for AI use, we may use AI as follows: ### **Usage patterns** - **Analytics for insights** – to identify, produce or understand insights within structured or unstructured materials via comprehensive data analysis, predictive modelling and/or reporting tools. - **Workplace Productivity** – to automate routine tasks, manage workflows, and facilitate communication. ### **Domains** - **Research** – to process complex datasets, simulate experiments, predict outcomes, and enhance review and evaluation processes. - **Corporate and\*\*\*\*policy** – to support corporate and policy functions by evaluating the usefulness and effectiveness to improve operational efficiency. In 2025, AASB and AUASB, following the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service (Microsoft 365 Copilot), made the product available to all staff. We do not propose using AI where the public may directly interact with—or be significantly impacted by–it without a human intermediary or intervention ## **Governance processes** We maintain an internal policy on the use of AI, which applies to all employees and contractors. It is consistent with and supports the provisions of DTA policy and guidance and will be reviewed and updated to ensure it remains so. All AI systems undergo a risk‑benefit assessment before entering production. We monitor the effectiveness of deployed AI systems on an ongoing basis and subsequent reassessments are conducted periodically or when triggered by significant changes such as model updates, new data sources, or incidents. Bias testing, human‑in‑the‑loop oversight, and mechanisms for stakeholders to contest decisions are also in place to protect against negative impacts as appropriate to the usage pattern. ## **Compliance** We will only use AI in accordance with relevant legislation, frameworks and policies, including the AASB – AUASB Code of Conduct, APS Values, data governance, privacy, cyber security and the _Policy for Responsible Use of AI in Government._ ### **Accountable officials** AASB‑AUASB Managing Director and AASB‑AUASB, Chief Operating Officer and Business Services Manager are the accountable officials responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations. ### **Transparency statement** This transparency statement will be reviewed and updated if our approach to the use of AI changes significantly, and at least every 12 months. It is published on the AASB website and can be accessed from the main menu under “AI Transparency.” ## **Contact us** If you have any questions about this statement, please contact [email protected]. Click [here ](https://www.auasb.gov.au/media/ctenxczf/aasb-auasb_ai_transparencystatement_12-25.pdf "AASB AUASB AI Transparencystatement 12 25")to view pdf version of AI Transparency Statement.
    fac5aa4
  2. first tracked+4673

    First tracked revision.

    9ff8360