DAFF

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 4 captures · last changed 26 Feb 2026

The story so far

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed; when Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry first published it is not recorded.

  2. substantive Updates DAFF's statement to policy v2.0, moves the accountable official to the CISO, names a Chief AI Officer, and adds compliance and fraud detection.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    • Accountable Official moved from Chief Data Officer to Chief Information and Security Officer
    • Chief Digital and Data Officer designated Chief AI Officer under the APS AI Plan 2025
    • New use domain: compliance and fraud detection
    • Removed: account of participating in the Pilot AI Assurance Framework and using it to assess use cases
    • Adds intention to adopt GovAI services (learning resources, app catalogue, sandbox)
    • Aligns with policy v2.0 obligations (strategy, training, impact assessment, use case register)
    • User Acceptance requirement now covers only external generative AI tools; 'publicly available information only' reminder dropped
    • Modified date updated to 16 February 2026
    • Added: Chief AI Officer: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Domain added: compliance and fraud detection
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: unspecified → v2
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-07-25 → 2026-02-16
    Show the words that changed ↓
  3. One cosmetic edit with no change of substance: Spells out "Chief AI Officer" in full instead of using the CAIO abbreviation, with no change to the roles described.

What the statement says

How to read this

DAFF says it uses AI for analytics and workplace productivity across corporate and enabling, scientific, service delivery and compliance and fraud detection domains, with no AI directly interacting with the public without a human intermediary. Governance rests on the Chief Information and Security Officer as Accountable Official, a Chief AI Officer (Chief Digital and Data Officer), an internal use-case register and a user acceptance requirement for generative AI tools. read by Claude Opus 5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Service delivery
  • Compliance and fraud detection
  • Scientific
  • Corporate and enabling

Public-facing AI: none

Safeguards named: risk assessment, human review of outputs, audit or assurance, staff training, use-case register, incident or concern reporting, privacy or security controls, an acceptable-use policy

Against the Standard 8/8

  • Present:Intentions behind AI use
  • Present:Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Present:Public-facing use addressed
  • Present:Monitoring and protection measures
  • Present:Compliance with the policy
  • Present:Compliance with legislation
  • Present:Date last updated
  • Present:Public contact

What the policy requiresPolicy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information and Security Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
in place
Staff training
available
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asksAI Plan

Chief AI Officer
in place (Chief Digital and Data Officer)

Currency as of 29 Aug 2026

Review cadence
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
16 Feb 2026
Last change we observed
26 Feb 2026
Updated since policy 2.0
yes
Annual review
within a year of its own date

Commitments

  • will notStaff must not input personal, sensitive or classified information into AI platforms
  • human oversightStaff responsible for ensuring accuracy and relevancy of any AI-generated content
  • willWill only utilise AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies
  • willUpdate and publish the statement at least annually and on significant change
  • willStaff must acknowledge the AI User Acceptance requirement before accessing generative AI tools
  • willTrack and monitor AI use cases through the internal register across the AI lifecycle
  • willUse the AI Assurance Framework to assess AI use cases across the lifecycle

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence transparency statementAlso appears in 11 other agenciesADHAAFMACCACGCDCCEEWDISRFWCHOUSEREPSIPAJSANZEA

The Policy for the responsible use of AI in government version 2.0 (the policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to: (Template language)

The policy sets out the Australian Government’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI).

This page provides details of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s (DAFF’s) implementation of these policy requirements to ensure our use of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal.

DAFF aligns to the definition of AI in the policy:

An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

This definition and the scope of this statement exclude rules-based automation, as these systems do not infer or predict how to generate outputs from the inputs it receives.

DAFF’s approach to AI adoption and use

DAFF is committed to ensuring the governance, design and application of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal, in alignment with our vision and values, Australia’s AI Ethics Principles, APS Experience Design Principles, and the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025.

DAFF is exploring the adoption of emerging technologies, including AI, as part of the Australian Government’s broader commitment to improve regulatory service delivery and decision-making. For more information, see the Data and Digital Government Strategy. DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI in alignment with the Government’s broader commitment to uplift data capability across the Australian Public Service (APS).

DAFF is committed to building strong governance foundations to support the safe and responsible use of AI.

All staff have access to the AI in Government fundamentals training, produced by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), and are required to report on the use of AI to the department’s Digital Business Division who manage the internal use case register. The department actively encourages staff to undertake the AI in Government fundamentals training through regular communications and promotional events.

Additionally, DAFF has an Artificial Intelligence User Acceptance requirement , which staff must confirm and acknowledge that they are familiar with before accessing external generative AI tools online. This requires staff to agree that they will:

  • Be responsible for ensuring the accuracy and relevancy of any content generated by any Artificial Intelligence platform.
  • Not input any personal, sensitive or classified information that may be subject to third party restrictions.

Through the User Acceptance page, staff are reminded that they must act in accordance with the Government’s Protective Security Policy Framework, Information Security Manual and internal departmental policies. Staff are also encouraged to read the department’s ICT Acceptable Use and Security Policies and Privacy Policy and are required to complete mandatory annual training on these topics.

Based on the classification system detailed in the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government, DAFF uses AI in the following ways: (Template language)

The department is using AI to:

  • Improve workplace productivity by automating routine tasks, supporting workflows, brainstorming and creation of draft content, and facilitating communications
  • Summarise high volumes of documents or information
  • Identify and understand patterns from dataset(s) to produce insights and reporting
  • Categorise documents for storage and retention.

DAFF does not currently use AI in any way that directly interacts with the public without a human intermediary or intervention.

Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official and Chief AI Officer (Template language)

DAFF has an Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official (AIAO) under the policy. The Chief Information and Security Officer has been designated as the Accountable Official. Previously, this role had been designated to the Chief Digital and Data Officer, who is now the Chief AI Officer. The AIAO is responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations and implementation of the policy. (Template language)

Under the AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025, agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer. The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the Chief AI Officer and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, propelling innovation, integrating AI into business processes and championing adoption of AI.

DAFF has an internal register of AI use cases. The internal register provides transparency and monitoring of AI use cases throughout the AI lifecycle.

  • Ensure the design and application of AI is effectively governed and managed.
  • Ensure risk management frameworks include AI-specific considerations, ensuring mitigation and controls are implemented when risks are identified.
  • Ensure AI use cases undergo an assurance process and re tracked and monitored through the internal register across the AI lifecycle.
  • Ensure AI use across the department is visible, to support the effective governance, assurance, reporting and risk management of use cases.
  • Promote the safe and responsible use of AI to departmental staff.
  • Promote collaboration across the department and other government agencies on the use of AI, including the ongoing development of resources to ensure its safe and responsible use.

DAFF will only utilise AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, and policies.

DAFF acknowledges the value of strong governance, oversight, and accountability, and is dedicated to regularly reviewing and updating its AI guidance and practices. This includes keeping up-to-date with advancements in AI technology, ethics, regulatory requirements and Whole of Government initiatives, such as GovAI. As these services roll out, the department will seek to utilise the functions GovAI offers to the Australian Public Service. These may include services that feature learning resources, an AI app catalogue, peer-to-peer collaboration tools, and a secure sandbox environment for testing and experimentation. DAFF will adopt GovAI offerings where consistent with departmental and government priorities.

As the landscape evolves, DAFF will continue to systematically review relevant AI policies and frameworks in consultation with staff, stakeholders, the community and our partners, where appropriate.

DAFF acknowledges that the AI Transparency Statement will be updated and published:

  • When making a significant change to our approach to AI.
  • When any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy.Also appears in 1 other agencyNACC
  • This Transparency Statement was modified on 16 February 2026.

For any enquiries relating to DAFF’s use of AI or the information provided within this Transparency Statement, contact ai@aff.gov.au.

Statement text © Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, reproduced for transparency tracking (most agency content is CC BY 4.0 — check the original for specifics).

Every revision

Every capture the daily scrape recorded that differed from the last, including edits with no change of substance. Pick a dot to view the statement as it stood at that capture.

  1. cosmetic+5

    Spells out "Chief AI Officer" in full instead of using the CAIO abbreviation, with no change to the roles described.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence transparency statement The [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy) version 2.0 (the policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to: - [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability); - [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai-transparency-statements); - [developing a strategic position on AI adoption](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [operationalising the responsible use of AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); - [AI use case accountability](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [internal use case registers](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [staff training on AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); and - [AI use case impact assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai-use-case-impact-assessment). The policy sets out the Australian Government’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI). This page provides details of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s (DAFF’s) implementation of these policy requirements to ensure our use of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal. ## Scope DAFF aligns to the definition of AI in the [policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy): _An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment_ (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This definition and the scope of this statement exclude rules-based automation, as these systems do not infer or predict how to generate outputs from the inputs it receives. ## DAFF’s approach to AI adoption and use DAFF is committed to ensuring the governance, design and application of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal, in alignment with [our vision and values](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/what-we-do "What we do"), [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles), [APS Experience Design Principles](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/aps-experience-design-principles), and the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). DAFF is exploring the adoption of emerging technologies, including AI, as part of the Australian Government’s broader commitment to improve regulatory service delivery and decision-making. For more information, see the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/). DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI in alignment with the Government’s broader commitment to uplift data capability across the Australian Public Service (APS). DAFF is committed to building strong governance foundations to support the safe and responsible use of AI. All staff have access to the AI in Government fundamentals training, produced by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), and are required to report on the use of AI to the department’s Digital Business Division who manage the internal use case register. The department actively encourages staff to undertake the AI in Government fundamentals training through regular communications and promotional events. Additionally, DAFF has an _Artificial Intelligence User Acceptance requirement_ , which staff must confirm and acknowledge that they are familiar with before accessing external generative AI tools online. This requires staff to agree that they will: - Be responsible for ensuring the accuracy and relevancy of any content generated by any Artificial Intelligence platform. - Not input any personal, sensitive or classified information that may be subject to third party restrictions. Through the _User Acceptance_ page, staff are reminded that they must act in accordance with the Government’s Protective Security Policy Framework, Information Security Manual and internal departmental policies. Staff are also encouraged to read the department’s ICT Acceptable Use and Security Policies and Privacy Policy and are required to complete mandatory annual training on these topics. ## DAFF’s use of AI Based on the [classification system detailed in the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), DAFF uses AI in the following ways: - **Domains** include: - Corporate and enabling - Scientific - Service delivery - Compliance and fraud detection - **Usage patterns** include: - Analytics for insights - Workplace productivity The department is using AI to: - Improve workplace productivity by automating routine tasks, supporting workflows, brainstorming and creation of draft content, and facilitating communications - Summarise high volumes of documents or information - Identify and understand patterns from dataset(s) to produce insights and reporting - Categorise documents for storage and retention. DAFF does not currently use AI in any way that directly interacts with the public without a human intermediary or intervention. ## Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official and Chief AI Officer DAFF has an Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official (AIAO) under the policy. The Chief Information and Security Officer has been designated as the Accountable Official. Previously, this role had been designated to the Chief Digital and Data Officer, who is now the Chief AI Officer. The AIAO is responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations and implementation of the policy. Under the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025), agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer (CAIO). The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the CAIOhief AI Officer and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, propelling innovation, integrating AI into business processes and championing adoption of AI. ## AI safety and governance DAFF has an internal register of AI use cases. The internal register provides transparency and monitoring of AI use cases throughout the AI lifecycle. DAFF has measures to: - Ensure the design and application of AI is effectively governed and managed. - Ensure risk management frameworks include AI-specific considerations, ensuring mitigation and controls are implemented when risks are identified. - Ensure AI use cases undergo an assurance process and re tracked and monitored through the internal register across the AI lifecycle. - Ensure AI use across the department is visible, to support the effective governance, assurance, reporting and risk management of use cases. - Promote the safe and responsible use of AI to departmental staff. - Promote collaboration across the department and other government agencies on the use of AI, including the ongoing development of resources to ensure its safe and responsible use. ## Compliance DAFF will only utilise AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, and policies. ## Continuous improvement DAFF acknowledges the value of strong governance, oversight, and accountability, and is dedicated to regularly reviewing and updating its AI guidance and practices. This includes keeping up-to-date with advancements in AI technology, ethics, regulatory requirements and Whole of Government initiatives, such as [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/). As these services roll out, the department will seek to utilise the functions GovAI offers to the Australian Public Service. These may include services that feature learning resources, an AI app catalogue, peer-to-peer collaboration tools, and a secure sandbox environment for testing and experimentation. DAFF will adopt GovAI offerings where consistent with departmental and government priorities. As the landscape evolves, DAFF will continue to systematically review relevant AI policies and frameworks in consultation with staff, stakeholders, the community and our partners, where appropriate. ## Updates DAFF acknowledges that the AI Transparency Statement will be updated and published: - At least once a year. - When making a significant change to our approach to AI. - When any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy. - This Transparency Statement was modified on 16 February 2026. ## Contact Us For any enquiries relating to DAFF’s use of AI or the information provided within this Transparency Statement, contact [ai@aff.gov.au](mailto:ai@aff.gov.au).
    832b504
  2. substantive+2080

    Updates DAFF's statement to policy v2.0, moves the accountable official to the CISO, names a Chief AI Officer, and adds compliance and fraud detection.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    # Artificial Intelligence transparency statement The [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy)ai/ai-in-government-policy) version 2.0 (the policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to: - [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-stateility); - [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/standard-ai-transparency-statements); - [developing a strategic position on AI adoption](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [operationalising the responsible use of AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); - [AI use case accountability](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [internal use case registers](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/strategy-and-oversight); - [staff training on AI](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/preparedness-and-operations); and - [AI use case impact assessment](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/ai-use-case-impact-assessments). The policy sets out the Australian Government’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI). This page provides details of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s (DAFF’s) implementation of these policy requirements to ensure our use of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal. ## Scope DAFF aligns to the definition of AI in the [policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy): _An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment_ (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This definition and the scope of this statement excludes rules-based automation, as these systems do not infer or predict how to generate outputs from the inputs it receives. ## DAFF’s approach to AI adoption and use DAFF is committed to ensuring the governance, design and application of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal, in alignment with [our vision and values](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/what-we-do "What we do"), [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and the, [APS Experience Design Principles](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/aps-experience-design-principles), and the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025). DAFF is exploring the adoption of emerging technologies, including AI, as part of the Australian Government’s broader commitment to improve regulatory service delivery and decision-making. DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI. For more information, see the [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/). DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI in alignment with the Government’s broader commitment to uplift data capability across the Australian Public Service (APS). DAFF is committed to building strong governance foundations to support the safe and responsible use of AI. All staff have access to the AI in Government fundamentals training, produced by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), and are required to report on the use of AI to the department’s Digital Business Division who manage the internal use case register. The department actively encourages staff to undertake the AI in Government fundamentals training through regular communications and promotional materialevents. Additionally, DAFF has an _Artificial Intelligence User Acceptance requirement_ , which staff must confirm and acknowledge that they are familiar with before accessing external generative AI tools online. This requires staff to agree that they will: - Be responsible for ensuring the accuracy and relevancy of any content generated by any Artificial Intelligence platform. - Not input any personal, sensitive or classified information that may be subject to government or third- party restrictions. Staff are reminded that they may only input publicly available information andThrough the _User Acceptance_ page, staff are reminded that they must act in accordance with the Government’s Protective Security Policy Framework and, Information Security Manual and internal departmental policies. Staff are also encouraged to read the department’s ICT Acceptable Use and Security Policies and Privacy Policy and are required to complete mandatory annual training on these topics. ## DAFF’s use of AI Based on the [classification system detailed in the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), DAFF uses AI in the following ways: - **Domains** include: - Corporate and enabling - Scientific - Service delivery - Compliance and fraud detection - **Usage patterns** include: - Analytics for insights - Workplace productivity The department is using AI to: - AImprove workplace productivity by automateing routine tasks, managesupporting workflows, createbrainstorming and creation of draft content, and facilitateing communications - Summarise high volumes of documents or information - Identify, produce or and understand insightpatterns from data - Understand patternset(s) to produce insights and trends in large data setsporting - Categorise documents for storage and retention. DAFF does not currently use AI in any way that directly interacts with the public without a human intermediary or intervention. ## Accountable Official DAFF has anrtificial Intelligence Accountable Official and Chief AI Officer DAFF has an Artificial Intelligence Accountable Official (AIAO) under the Ppolicy. The Chief Data Officer (CDO) was designated as the Accountable Official on 16 October 2024Information and Security Officer has been designated as the Accountable Official. Previously, this role had been designated to the Chief Digital and Data Officer, who is now the Chief AI Officer. The AIAO is responsible for ensuring compliance with all AI obligations and implementation of the policy. Under the [AI Plan for the Australian Public Service 2025](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025), agencies must appoint a Chief AI Officer (CAIO). The Chief Digital and Data Officer has been designated as the CAIO and is responsible for leading the AI strategy and implementation, propelling innovation, integrating AI into business processes and championing adoption of AI. ## AI safety and governance DAFF has an internal register of AI use cases. The internal register provides transparency and monitoring of AI use cases throughout the AI lifecycle. DAFF has measures to ensure: - Ensure the design and application of AI is effectively governed and managed. - Ensure risk management frameworks include AI\*\*-\*\* -specific considerations, ensuring mitigation and controls are implemented when risks are identified. - Ensure AI use cases aundergo an assurance process and re tracked and monitored through the internal register across the AI lifecycle. - Ensure AI use across the department is visible, to support the effective governance, assurance, reporting and risk management of use cases. - Promote the safe and responsible use of AI to departmental staff. - Promote collaboration across the department and other government agencies on the use of AI, including the ongoing development of resources to ensure its safe and responsible use. ## Compliance DAFF will only utilise AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, and policies. ## Continuous Iimprovement DAFF is commitacknowledges the value of strong governance, oversight, and accountability, and is dedicated to regularly reviewing and updating AI policiesits AI guidance and practices. This includes staying informed about new developkeeping up-to-date with advancements in AI technology, ethics, and regulatory requirements. For example, in September 2024, DAFF participated in the [Pilot Australian Government AI Assurance Framework and Whole of Government initiatives, such as [GovAI](https://www.digitalgovai.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) (AI Assurance Framework) and applied a number of aspects in the AI Assurance Framework to certain AI use case trials to test its application and impact. Following on from the pilot’s conclus). As these services roll out, the department will seek to utilise the functions GovAI offers to the Australian Public Service. These may include services that feature learning resources, an AI app catalogue, peer-to-peer collaboration tools, and a secure sandbox environment for testing and experimentation,. DAFF uses the AI Assurance Framework to assess current AI use cases at the various stages of the AI lifecyclewill adopt GovAI offerings where consistent with departmental and government priorities. As the landscape evolves, DAFF will continue to systematically review relevant AI policies and frameworks in consultation with staff, stakeholders, the community and our partners, where appropriate. ## Updates DAFF acknowledges that the AI Transparency Statement will be updated and published: - At least once a year. - When making a significant change to our approach to AI. - When any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy. - This Transparency Statement was modified on 25 Jul16 February 20256. ## Contact uUs For any enquiries relating to DAFF’s use of AI or the information provided within this Transparency Statement, contact [ai@aff.gov.au](mailto:ai@aff.gov.au).
    078058e
  3. scrape noise-1584

    Only a navigation sidebar of reporting links dropped out of the capture; the statement text itself is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5
    View diff
    ## Sidebar first - About - [Reporting obligations](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations) - [Report on agency appointments](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/agency-appointments) - [Senate Order for Entity contracts listing](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/contracts) - [Documents tabled in Parliament](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/documents-tabled) - [Australian public service employee census](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/employee-census) - [Emissions Reduction Plan](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/operations-emissions-reduction) - [Executive and highly-paid staff remuneration](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/executive-remuneration) - [Gifts and benefits](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/gifts-benefits) - [Government responses](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/government-responses) - [Grants reporting](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/grants) - [Indexed list of files](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/indexed-files) - [Legal expenditure](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/legal-expenditure) - [AI transparency statement](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/AI-transparency-statement) - [Campaign certification statements](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/reporting/obligations/campaign-certification) # Artificial Intelligence transparency statement The [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the policy) provides mandatory requirements for departments and agencies relating to [accountable officials](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/accountable-officials), and [transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/transparency-statements). The policy sets out the Australian Government’s approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI). This page provides details of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s (DAFF’s) implementation of these policy requirements to ensure our use of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal. ## Scope DAFF aligns to the definition of AI in the [policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy): _An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment_ (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This definition and the scope of this statement excludes rules-based automation, as these systems do not infer or predict how to generate outputs from the inputs it receives. ## DAFF’s approach to AI adoption and use DAFF is committed to ensuring the governance, design and application of AI is safe, responsible, ethical and legal, in alignment with [our vision and values](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/what-we-do "What we do"), [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and the [APS Experience Design Principles](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/aps-experience-design-principles). DAFF is exploring the adoption of emerging technologies, including AI, as part of the Australian Government’s broader commitment to improve regulatory service delivery and decision-making. DAFF will continue to explore innovative ways of using AI. DAFF is committed to building strong governance foundations to support the safe and responsible use of AI. All staff have access to the AI in Government fundamentals training, produced by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), and are required to report on the use of AI to the department’s Digital Business Division. The department actively encourages staff to undertake the AI in Government fundamentals training through regular communications and promotional materials. Additionally, DAFF has an _Artificial Intelligence User Acceptance requirement_ , which staff must confirm and acknowledge that they are familiar with before accessing generative AI tools online. This requires staff to agree that they will: - Be responsible for ensuring the accuracy and relevancy of any content generated by any Artificial Intelligence platform. - Not input any personal, sensitive or classified information that may be subject to government or third-party restrictions. Staff are reminded that they may only input publicly available information and must act in accordance with the Government’s Protective Security Policy Framework and Information Security Manual. Staff are also encouraged to read the department’s ICT Acceptable Use and Security Policies and Privacy Policy and are required to complete mandatory annual training on these topics. ## DAFF’s use of AI Based on the [classification system detailed in the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification), DAFF uses AI in the following ways: - **Domains** include: - Corporate and enabling - Scientific - Service delivery - **Usage patterns** include: - Analytics for insights - Workplace productivity The department is using AI to: - Automate routine tasks, manage workflows, create content, and facilitate communication - Summarise high volumes of documents or information - Identify, produce or understand insights from data - Understand patterns and trends in large data sets - Categorise documents for storage and retention. DAFF does not currently use AI in any way that directly interacts with the public without a human intermediary or intervention. ## Accountable Official DAFF has an Accountable Official under the Policy. The Chief Data Officer (CDO) was designated as the Accountable Official on 16 October 2024. ## AI safety and governance DAFF has an internal register of AI use cases. The internal register provides transparency and monitoring of AI use cases throughout the AI lifecycle. DAFF has measures to ensure: - Ensure the design and application of AI is effectively governed and managed. - Ensure risk management frameworks include AI\*\*-\*\* specific considerations, ensuring mitigation and controls are implemented when risks are identified. - Ensure AI use cases are tracked and monitored through the internal register across the AI lifecycle. - Ensure AI use across the department is visible, to support the effective governance, assurance, reporting and risk management of use cases. - Promote the safe and responsible use of AI to departmental staff. - Promote collaboration across the department and other government agencies on the use of AI, including the ongoing development of resources to ensure its safe and responsible use. ## Compliance DAFF will only utilise AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, and policies. ## Continuous Improvement DAFF is committed to regularly reviewing and updating AI policies and practices. This includes staying informed about new developments in AI technology, ethics, and regulatory requirements. For example, in September 2024, DAFF participated in the [Pilot Australian Government AI Assurance Framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework) (AI Assurance Framework) and applied a number of aspects in the AI Assurance Framework to certain AI use case trials to test its application and impact. Following on from the pilot’s conclusion, DAFF uses the AI Assurance Framework to assess current AI use cases at the various stages of the AI lifecycle. As the landscape evolves, DAFF will continue to systematically review relevant AI policies and frameworks in consultation with staff, stakeholders, the community and our partners, where appropriate. ## Updates DAFF acknowledges that the AI Transparency Statement will be updated and published: - At least once a year. - When making a significant change to our approach to AI. - When any new factor materially impacts the existing statement’s accuracy. - This Transparency Statement was modified on 25 July 2025. ## Contact us For any enquiries relating to DAFF’s use of AI or the information provided within this Transparency Statement, contact [ai@aff.gov.au](mailto:ai@aff.gov.au).
    9226d49
  4. first tracked+8610

    First tracked revision.

    07278a5