FINANCE

Department of Finance

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 3 versions · last changed 2 Mar 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed, and doesn’t say when it was first published.

  2. substantive Finance rewrites its statement: it names a Chief AI Officer, describes its lead role under the APS AI Plan and GovAI Chat, sets data limits by tool, and replaces its two co-chairing officials.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Chief AI Officer appointed (FAS, AI Delivery and Enablement Division); co-chairs the AI Governance Committee and co-authorises the statement with the Accountable Official
    • Removed: second accountable official (FAS, Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division) and the list of committee member divisions
    • New disclosure: Finance develops and runs GovAI Chat and leads APS AI Plan delivery through its AIDE function
    • Microsoft 365 Copilot may be used with information up to PROTECTED; public AI tools are limited to OFFICIAL, with no personal or sensitive data
    • Removed: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini no longer named as public AI tools staff use
    • New commitment: AI uses with medium or high residual risk after safeguards will not be approved, and deployment is deferred where risk is uncertain
    • New: standing central approvals for low-risk uses; any other use needs an AI impact assessment and registration
    • New: effectiveness measured through adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and incidents
    • Removed: triggers for reassessing use cases, the list of seven risk criteria and the definition of low risk
    • Removed: claim that all mandatory requirements of the Policy have been implemented
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (human oversight): Limit AI to low-risk use cases: no direct public interaction or significant impact without human intervention
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Reassess use cases on notable change, life-cycle progression, or identified AI risk or harm
    • Removed: Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
    • Removed: Named tool dropped: ChatGPT
    • Removed: Named tool dropped: Claude
    • Removed: Named tool dropped: Gemini
    • Added: AI use-case register: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Chief AI Officer: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Named tool added: GovAI Chat
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Do not enter personal, sensitive or classified information into public generative AI tools
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Won't approve AI solutions or uses still carrying medium or high risk after safeguards
    • Added: New commitment (will): Committed to full implementation of the Policy and ongoing compliance
    • Added: New commitment (will): Defer deployment where residual risk is uncertain until risks are appropriately mitigated
    • Added: New commitment (will): Uses beyond central approvals require an AI impact assessment and registration
    • Added: Safeguard added: incident or concern reporting
    • Added: Safeguard added: use case register
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: with human review → not addressed
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

Finance lets staff use Microsoft 365 Copilot internally and public generative AI tools for low-risk workplace productivity and analytics work, and rules out decision-making, image processing, compliance and law-enforcement uses. It risk-rates each use case against the AI Ethics Principles, won't approve medium- or high-risk uses, oversees AI through a governance committee co-chaired by its Accountable Official and Chief AI Officer, and requires staff to complete training before they can use its internal AI. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Scientific
  • Policy and legal
  • Service delivery
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot, GovAI Chat

Public-facing AI: not addressed

Safeguards named: risk assessment, a governance body, an acceptable-use policy, staff training, privacy or security controls, use-case register, incident or concern reporting

The Standard’s eight elements 6 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Not found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Not found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
First Assistant Secretary, Information, Communication and Technology Division
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
in place
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
in place (First Assistant Secretary, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division)

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
no date given
Last change we saw
2 Mar 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes

Commitments

  • will not Do not use AI for decision making and administrative action or image processing
  • will not Do not use AI in compliance and fraud detection or law enforcement, intelligence and security domains
  • will not Won't approve AI solutions or uses still carrying medium or high risk after safeguards
  • will not Do not enter personal, sensitive or classified information into public generative AI tools
  • will Report any use case reassessed as high risk to the DTA
  • will Staff must complete training before access to secure internal AI
  • will Review and update this statement annually or when significant changes affect it
  • will Defer deployment where residual risk is uncertain until risks are appropriately mitigated
  • will Uses beyond central approvals require an AI impact assessment and registration
  • will Committed to full implementation of the Policy and ongoing compliance

The statement

How to read this

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement Also appears in 18 other agencies AASB ACIAR AFP AFSA ARPC AUASB BOM DFAT DSS DVA EDUCATION HSRA NAA NLA PC PSR SIA TEQSA

The Department of Finance (Finance) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI to offer significant opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery while preserving accountability, transparency and public trust.

As a central agency, we provide high quality advice, frameworks and services to achieve value in the management of public resources for the benefit of all Australians. As the lead agency responsible for key initiatives under the APS AI Plan, we aim to lead by example in the responsible adoption and use of AI across government, supported by strong governance, clear accountability and transparency.

The AI Delivery and Enablement (AIDE) function within Finance is responsible for driving the delivery of the APS AI Plan, accelerating AI adoption across the APS, addressing common barriers and monitoring AI implementation, coordinating the APS network of Chief AI Officers and developing metrics for successful AI adoption and use.

The GovAI project directly supports this approach by providing a secure, APS-only environment for exploring AI tools, experimenting safely with AI and data, and sharing early use cases and lessons learned across government. Finance is using this platform to develop and operate GovAI Chat, a secure general purpose AI tool designed to expand access to generative AI across the APS in a controlled and secure environment.

In the use of AI within Finance, we follow whole-of-government policy and support our staff in low-risk use cases, building our internal AI capability as well as the Digital Transformation Agency’s Policy for the responsible use of AI in government (the Policy). (Template language)

We also apply Australia’s AI Ethics Principles and use the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD) definitions to help identify which of our systems use AI.

When we consider our use of AI, we apply the DTA’s Pilot AI assurance framework, the AI impact assessment tool and the Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguards in place.

How we measure the effectiveness of our AI

We monitor AI adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and AI-related incidents to assess effectiveness and inform updates to our governance settings, guidance and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial.

Our AI solutions are approved centrally, with risks managed at the enterprise level. This includes standing approvals for low-risk uses, such as using Microsoft 365 Copilot to draft emails with information classified up to OFFICIAL.

Our staff use AI to support everyday work, including making documents accessible, supporting policy analysis, summarising information, analysing data, answering policy and process questions, drafting and reviewing content, writing and debugging code, and preparing meeting minutes and transcripts.

If staff want to use AI beyond these central approvals, they must complete an AI impact assessment and register their use as required by the DTA’s Policy.

We assess AI solutions and compare against criteria drawn from Australia's AI Ethics Principles. Each assessment is rated low, medium or high which helps us decide if the AI use case can be used and what extra controls might be needed.

We won’t approve AI solutions or uses that still carry a medium or high level of risk after safeguards are applied. Where residual risk remains uncertain or insufficiently understood, deployment is deferred until risks can be appropriately mitigated. Any proposal assessed as high risk is also reported to the DTA.

We allow our staff to use AI to improve productivity and help deliver the advice, frameworks and services that Finance provides to government and other agencies.

Finance provides staff with access to AI tools in two ways. In our internal environment, staff can use Microsoft 365 Copilot, which operates within Finance’s Protected network and can be used with information up to PROTECTED, subject to our internal governance arrangements.

Staff use public generative AI tools to enhance productivity and support their core responsibilities. When used outside Finance’s environment, only unclassified information up to OFFICIAL may be entered. Personal, sensitive or classified information must not be entered.

Compliance with these requirements is monitored through our information security and governance frameworks.

Our AI patterns and domains

Finance classifies staff use of AI using the DTA’s Classification system for AI use. Our AI use case patterns and domains are:

  • analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse information, mainly in the Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information
  • workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with routine tasks, mainly in the Service delivery and Corporate and enabling domains.

We do not use AI within the decision making and administrative action or Image processing usage patterns, or the compliance and fraud detection, and Law enforcement, intelligence and security domains.

We govern our internal AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the DTA’s Policy and best practice.

Our AI Governance Committee

We have established an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) as well as appointed an Accountable Official (AO) and a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to oversee how Finance adopts and uses AI across the department. (Template language)

The AIGC is jointly chaired by the AO and CAIO, with membership drawn from senior executives across the department. It supports safe and responsible AI use by providing oversight of key decisions, risks and controls for AI use at Finance. The functions of AIGC include:

  • promoting a culture of safe and responsible AI use across our workplace
  • monitoring, assessing and managing AI‑related risks and opportunities
  • overseeing and implementing policies and guidance from the DTA.

Our internal policies and processes

Finance has policies and processes for the adoption and use of AI by our staff, including:

  • Guidance on the use of generative artificial intelligence
  • Information security management policy framework
  • Information and data policy
  • Risk management policy framework.

These policies and processes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain fit for purpose.

We provide our staff with guidance and training on the safe and responsible use of AI. Staff are required to complete this training prior to being granted access to our secure internal AI.

Finance is committed to the full implementation of the Policy and to maintaining ongoing compliance. This commitment includes reviewing and updating this statement annually, or sooner where there is a significant change to our approach to artificial intelligence.

Who to contact regarding our statement

For any questions regarding this statement, or for more information about how Finance uses AI, please email feedback@finance.gov.au.

This statement is authorised by Finance’s Accountable Official, the First Assistant Secretary, Information, Communication and Technology Division, and the Chief AI Officer, First Assistant Secretary, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division. (Template language)

Statement text © Department of Finance. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. noise +11
    The words that changed
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement The Department of Finance (Finance) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI to offer significant opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery while preserving accountability, transparency and public trust. As a central agency, we provide high quality advice, frameworks and services to achieve value in the management of public resources for the benefit of all Australians. As the lead agency responsible for key initiatives under the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/at-a-glance), we aim to lead by example in the responsible adoption and use of AI across government, supported by strong governance, clear accountability and transparency. ## Our approach to AI The AI Delivery and Enablement (AIDE) function within Finance is responsible for driving the delivery of the APS AI Plan, accelerating AI adoption across the APS, addressing common barriers and monitoring AI implementation, coordinating the APS network of Chief AI Officers and developing metrics for successful AI adoption and use. The [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) project directly supports this approach by providing a secure, APS-only environment for exploring AI tools, experimenting safely with AI and data, and sharing early use cases and lessons learned across government. Finance is using this platform to develop and operate [GovAI Chat](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/tools), a secure general purpose AI tool designed to expand access to generative AI across the APS in a controlled and secure environment. In the use of AI within Finance, we follow whole-of-government policy and support our staff in low-risk use cases, building our internal AI capability as well as the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy). We also apply [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and use the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD)](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles) definitions to help identify which of our systems use AI. When we consider our use of AI, we apply the DTA’s [Pilot AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework), the [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) and the [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.financedigital.gov.au/about-us/departmentpolicy/ai/AI-technical-standard) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguards in place. ### How we measure the effectiveness of our AI We monitor AI adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and AI-related incidents to assess effectiveness and inform updates to our governance settings, guidance and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. Our AI solutions are approved centrally, with risks managed at the enterprise level. This includes standing approvals for low-risk uses, such as using Microsoft 365 Copilot to draft emails with information classified up to OFFICIAL. Our staff use AI to support everyday work, including making documents accessible, supporting policy analysis, summarising information, analysing data, answering policy and process questions, drafting and reviewing content, writing and debugging code, and preparing meeting minutes and transcripts. If staff want to use AI beyond these central approvals, they must complete an AI impact assessment and register their use as required by the DTA’s Policy. We assess AI solutions and compare against criteria drawn from [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). Each assessment is rated low, medium or high which helps us decide if the AI use case can be used and what extra controls might be needed. We won’t approve AI solutions or uses that still carry a medium or high level of risk after safeguards are applied. Where residual risk remains uncertain or insufficiently understood, deployment is deferred until risks can be appropriately mitigated. Any proposal assessed as high risk is also reported to the DTA. ## How we use AI We allow our staff to use AI to improve productivity and help deliver the advice, frameworks and services that Finance provides to government and other agencies. Finance provides staff with access to AI tools in two ways. In our internal environment, staff can use Microsoft 365 Copilot, which operates within Finance’s Protected network and can be used with information up to PROTECTED, subject to our internal governance arrangements. Staff use public generative AI tools to enhance productivity and support their core responsibilities. When used outside Finance’s environment, only unclassified information up to OFFICIAL may be entered. Personal, sensitive or classified information must not be entered. Compliance with these requirements is monitored through our information security and governance frameworks. ### **Our AI patterns and domains** Finance classifies staff use of AI using the DTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are: ·- analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse information, mainly in the Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information ·- workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with routine tasks, mainly in the Service delivery and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within the Ddecision making and administrative action or Image processing usage patterns, or the Ccompliance and fraud detection, and Law enforcement, intelligence and security domains. ## How we govern our AI use We govern our internal AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the DTA’s Policy and best practice. ### **Our AI Governance Committee** We have established an AI Governance Committee (AIGC) as well as appointed an Accountable Official (AO) and a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to oversee how Finance adopts and uses AI across the department. The AIGC is jointly chaired by the AO and CAIO, with membership drawn from senior executives across the department. It supports safe and responsible AI use by providing oversight of key decisions, risks and controls for AI use at Finance. The functions of AIGC include: - promoting a culture of safe and responsible AI use across our workplace - monitoring, assessing and managing AI‑related risks and opportunities - overseeing and implementing policies and guidance from the DTA. ### **Our internal policies and processes** Finance has policies and processes for the adoption and use of AI by our staff, including: - Acceptable use policy - Guidance on the use of generative artificial intelligence - Information security management policy framework - Information and data policy - Privacy policy - Risk management policy framework. These policies and processes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain fit for purpose. We provide our staff with guidance and training on the safe and responsible use of AI. Staff are required to complete this training prior to being granted access to our secure internal AI. Finance is committed to the full implementation of the Policy and to maintaining ongoing compliance. This commitment includes reviewing and updating this statement annually, or sooner where there is a significant change to our approach to artificial intelligence. ## Who to contact regarding our statement For any questions regarding this statement, or for more information about how Finance uses AI, please email [feedback@finance.gov.au](mailto:feedback@finance.gov.au). ## Authorisation This statement is authorised by Finance’s Accountable Official, the First Assistant Secretary, Information, Communication and Technology Division, and the Chief AI Officer, First Assistant Secretary, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division.
    2ab0243
  2. substantive +1300

    Finance rewrites its statement: it names a Chief AI Officer, describes its lead role under the APS AI Plan and GovAI Chat, sets data limits by tool, and replaces its two co-chairing officials.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency Statement The Department of Finance (Finance) is committed to the safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI). We consider AI to offers significant opportunities to improve productivity and service delivery within our workplace. We govern our AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the Digital Transformation Agency's (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy) and best practice. ## Our approach to AI At Finance, we are applying the guidance outlined in DTA’s Pilot [Australian Government AI assurance framework ](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework)(the Framework) and have chosen to limit our use of AI to low-risk use cases. This guidance implementshile preserving accountability, transparency and public trust. As a central agency, we provide high quality advice, frameworks and services to achieve value in the management of public resources for the benefit of all Australians. As the lead agency responsible for key initiatives under the [APS AI Plan](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/at-a-glance), we aim to lead by example in the responsible adoption and use of AI across government, supported by strong governance, clear accountability and transparency. ## Our approach to AI The AI Delivery and Enablement (AIDE) function within Finance is responsible for driving the delivery of the APS AI Plan, accelerating AI adoption across the APS, addressing common barriers and monitoring AI implementation, coordinating the APS network of Chief AI Officers and developing metrics for successful AI adoption and use. The [GovAI](https://www.govai.gov.au/) project directly supports this approach by providing a secure, APS-only environment for exploring AI tools, experimenting safely with AI and data, and sharing early use cases and lessons learned across government. Finance is using this platform to develop and operate [GovAI Chat](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/australian-public-service-ai-plan-2025/tools), a secure general purpose AI tool designed to expand access to generative AI across the APS in a controlled and secure environment. In the use of AI within Finance, we follow whole-of-government policy and support our staff in low-risk use cases, building our internal AI capability as well as the Digital Transformation Agency’s [Policy for the responsible use of AI in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) (the Policy). We also apply [Australia’s AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and uses the [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD)](https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles) concepts to define AI anddefinitions to help identify which of our systems uses AI. We assess the risk of each use case against 7 criteria and a risk matrix outlined in [the framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework). These are: - fairness - reliability and safety - privacy protection and security - transparency and explainability - contestability - accountability - human-centered values. This assessment determines if a use case is low, medium, or high risk. A low-risk use case means AI does not: - directly interact with, or significhen we consider our use of AI, we apply the DTA’s [Pilot AI assurance framework](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/pilot-ai-assurance-framework), the [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool) and the [Technical standard for government’s use of artificial intelligence](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/department) to help us assess impacts, identify risks and put the right safeguards in place. ### How we measure the effectiveness of our AI We monitor AI adoption, training completion, productivity impacts and AI-related incidents to assess effectiveness and inform updates to our governance settings, guidance and training to ensure AI use remains proportionate, safe and beneficial. Our AI solutions are approved centrally, with risks managed at the enterprise level. This includes standing approvals for low-risk uses, such as using Microsoft 365 Copilot to draft emails with information classified up to OFFICIAL. Our staff use AI to support everyday work, including making documents accessible, supporting policy antaly impact the public without human intervention - risk the security of the information or data we hold - harm the privacy of any individual, including our staff. We reassess our use cases when: - a notablsis, summarising information, analysing data, answering policy and process questions, drafting and reviewing content, writing and debugging code, and preparing meeting minutes and transcripts. If staff want to use AI beyond these central approvals, they must complete an AI impact assessment and register their use as required by the DTA’s Policy. We assess AI solutions and compare against criteria drawn from [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles). Each assessment is rated low, medium or high which helps us decide if the AI use case change is made to our approach to AI or use of AI - a use case progresses to another stage in its life cycle - an AI risk or harm is identified with a use case. Any use case re be used and what extra controls might be needed. We won’t approve AI solutions or uses that still carry a medium or high level of risk after safeguards are applied. Where residual risk remains uncertain or insufficiently understood, deployment is deferred until risks can be appropriately mitigated. Any proposal assessed as being high risk will beis also reported to the DTA. ## How we use AI We allow our staff to use AI in their work with the objective of enhancingto improve productivity and servicehelp delivery. This includes enterprise AI deployed in our closed the advice, frameworks and services that Finance provides to government and other agencies. Finance provides staff with access to AI tools in two ways. In our internal ICT environment lik, staff can use Microsoft 365 Copilot, as well as publicly available AI like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini that is that is not deployed in our closed internal ICT environwhich operates within Finance’s Protected network and can be used with information up to PROTECTED, subject to our internal governance arrangements. The tasks completed by our staff usingStaff use public generative AI faltools into several usage patterns and domains as outlined by the DTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/senhance productivity and support their core responsibilities/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf). These are: - the _Analytics and insights_ usage pattern primarily in the _Scientific_ , and _Policy and legal_ domains, where the sensitivity of the data is low risk - the _Workplace productivity_ usage pattern primarily in the _Service delivery_ , and _Corporate and enabling_ domains. Our staff use AI to: - assist . When used outside Finance’s environment, only unclassified information up to OFFICIAL may be entered. Personal, sensitive or classified information must not be entered. Compliance with these requirements is monitored through our information security and governance frameworks. ### **Our AI patterns and domains** Finance classifies staff use of AI using the creation of accessible versions of government documents, - assist with policy research and analysis - summarise data across multiple sources - interrogate, analyse and obtain insights from datasets - answer questions from staff regarding workplace policies, procedures and processes - assist in the analysis, creation or summarisation of documentsDTA’s [Classification system for AI use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). Our AI use case patterns and domains are: · analytics for insights AI pattern, where we use AI to help analyse information, emails or other content - create and debug code used in data analysis, management and processing - assist in the creation of meeting minutes or interview transcripts - search information repositories and retrieve documents, information or datanly in the Scientific and Policy and legal domains, using low‑risk information · workplace productivity AI pattern, where we use AI to help staff with routine tasks, mainly in the Service delivery and Corporate and enabling domains. We do not use AI within the _Decision making and administrative action_ or _Image processing_ usage patterns, or the _Compliance and fraud detection_ , and _Law enforcement, intelligence and security_ domains. ## How we govern our AI Finance has a risk-based approach to the use of AI. This approach focuses on identifying, evaluating and monitoring the level of risk associated with implementing AI systems. Once implemented, we monitor the effectiveness of our AI systems by: - having robust governance arrangements, p use We govern our internal AI in line with applicable laws and regulations, the DTA’s Policiesy and processes; and - monitoring AI usagbest practice. ### **Our AI Governance Committee** We have established an AI Governance Committee (the Committee) to oversee our adoption and use of AI within Finance. The functions of this Committee include: - developing and implementing AI safely - identifying, assessing and managing AI risks and opportunities - promoting a culture of safe and responsible use of AI - overseeing and implementing policies and advice from the DTA. This Committee is co-chaired by two accountable officials (AIGC) as well as appointed an Accountable Official (AO) and a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to oversee how Finance adopts and uses AI across the department. The AIGC is jointly chaired by the AO) and CAIO, witsh membership includesdrawn from senior executive representatives from the following areas: - Information Communication Technology Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary, Chief Information Officer and AO) - Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division (co-chair, First Assistant Secretary and AO) - Budget Policy and Data Division - Corporate Strategy and Operations Division - Digital ID and Data Policy Division - Legal and Assurance Branch - Human Resources Branchs across the department. It supports safe and responsible AI use by providing oversight of key decisions, risks and controls for AI use at Finance. The functions of AIGC include: - promoting a culture of safe and responsible AI use across our workplace - monitoring, assessing and managing AI‑related risks and opportunities - overseeing and implementing policies and guidance from the DTA. ### **Our internal policies and processes** Finance has policies and processes for the adoption and use of AI by our staff, including: - Acceptable use policy - Guidance on the use of generative artificial intelligence - Information security management policy framework - Information and data policy - Privacy policy - Risk management policy framework. These policies and processes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain fit for purpose. We provide our staff with guidance and training on the safe and responsible use of AI. Staff are required to complete this training prior to being granted access to our secure internal AI. ### Our adherence to Whole of Australian Government AI policies Finance is dedicacommitted to the fully implementing [ation of the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) and ensuring ongoing compliance with [the Policy.](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy) This and to maintaining ongoing compliance. This commitment includes reviewing and updating this statement annually, or when new factors orsooner where there is a significant changes to our AI approach impact it. Finance has implemented all mandatory requirements outlined within [the Policy](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/policy), as demonstrated by the information contained within this statementto artificial intelligence. ## Who to contact regarding our statement For any questions regarding this statement, or for more information about how Finance uses AI, please email: [feedback@finance.gov.au](mailto:feedback@finance.gov.au). ## Authorisation This statement is authorised by Finance’s two aAccountable oOfficials, the First Assistant Secretary of the, Information, Communication and Technology Division, and the Chief AI Officer, First Assistant Secretary of the Risk, Claims and Regulatory Reform Division. ______________________________________________________________________ Did you find this content useful? \_\_ \_\_ Your comments (if any) Page Submit Leave this field blank, Artificial Intelligence Delivery and Enablement Division.
    0a7413b
  3. first tracked +7021

    First tracked version.

    b7e2a3d