IGTO

Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman

Tracked since 26 Feb 2026 · 1 change of substance across 3 versions · last changed 23 July 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed, and doesn’t say when it was first published.

  2. substantive Rebrands as the Tax Ombudsman, adds AI call transcripts and case summaries, and relaxes staff rules so public AI tools may be used in low-risk situations.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Removed: staff restricted to enterprise AI only; now publicly available AI tools are allowed in low-risk situations without personal, sensitive or protected information
    • Staff explicitly permitted to put personal or sensitive information into enterprise AI tools
    • New use disclosed: AI generates call transcripts and case summaries in complaint handling
    • Now exploring AI for draft content, case studies and summarising text, images, audio and video
    • Removed: mention of exploring chatbot technology
    • Contact changed from igt@igt.gov.au to enquiries@taxombudsman.gov.au
    • Agency now calls itself the Tax Ombudsman rather than the IGTO
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): Staff permitted only enterprise AI; less secure AI tools restricted
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Publicly available AI tools only in low-risk situations without personal, sensitive or protected information
    • Added: New commitment (will): Progressively restrict URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The IGTO uses AI mainly for internal efficiency: all staff have Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection, and AI helps with complaint-progress updates, call transcripts and routine communications, but not with decisions. Its Chief Information & Security Officer is the accountable official and reports to the executive committee. Under an updated ICT conditions-of-use policy, staff are steered to enterprise AI tools, and publicly available tools are allowed only in low-risk situations. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Workplace productivity
  • Analytics for insights
  • Service delivery
  • Corporate and enabling

Named tools: Microsoft Copilot

Public-facing AI: unclear

Safeguards named: an acceptable-use policy, a governance body, privacy or security controls

The Standard’s eight elements 6 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Not found: Compliance with legislation
  • Not found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Information & Security Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
not mentioned
Staff training
not mentioned
Policy version referenced
unspecified version

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
annually and when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
no date given
Last change we saw
23 July 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes

Commitments

  • will not No plans to apply AI in any decision making
  • will not Publicly available AI tools only in low-risk situations without personal, sensitive or protected information
  • human oversight Executive committee oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI
  • will Progressively restrict URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use
  • will Statement will be updated as new uses for AI are introduced
  • will Accountable official reviews and updates statement annually or when significant changes occur
  • will Accountable official will notify the DTA of new high-risk AI use cases

The statement

How to read this

The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. (Template language)

How the Tax Ombudsman uses AI

The Tax Ombudsman is committed to the safe and responsible adoption of AI in our services. We are embedding a culture that fairly balances AI risk management and innovation. This statement will be updated as we introduce new uses for AI.

Our current use of AI is solely for the benefit of improved efficiency in our internal processes. AI is used in our complaints to keep people informed of complaint progress and to generate call transcripts. We are exploring use of AI to create initial draft content for review, generate case studies, and summarise content such as text, images, audio and video. We have no plans to apply AI in any decision making.

The Tax Ombudsman makes available to all staff a version of Microsoft Copilot that has enterprise data protection, meaning our data does not leave our ICT environment. The Tax Ombudsman is using AI:

  • in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint process and routine communications, generating call transcripts and case summaries, but not decision making
  • in the domain of corporate and enabling, through the granting general access to Copilot for all staff, for example, budget management and development of corporate documentation
  • in the usage pattern of workplace productivity, such as by automating tasks and workflows, and summarising content
  • in the usage pattern of analytics for insights, such as by debugging code used in data analysis and extracting key themes from free text.

We have updated our ICT conditions of use policy to include the use of AI tools by all staff:

  • Staff are required to read and accept these conditions of use.
  • Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically.
  • Staff are strongly encouraged to use enterprise AI tools at all times. These have been configured to meet our information security requirements. Staff are permitted to input personal or sensitive information into these tools.
  • Staff are only allowed to use publicly available AI tools in low-risk situations that do not involve personal, sensitive or protected information.
  • In practice, we progressively restrict the URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use.

The DTA policy requires the appointment of an accountable official. The Tax Ombudsman has appointed its Chief Information & Security Officer (CISO). Our CISO is responsible for developing a Tax Ombudsman implementation plan, monitoring and measuring policy implementation, notifying the DTA of new high-risk AI use cases, facilitating cross-government coordination, staying updated with policy changes, and reviewing and updating the statement annually or when significant changes occur. (Template language)

The accountable official also reports to the Executive Committee which oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI. (Template language)

If you have any enquiries about this statement, please contact enquiries@taxombudsman.gov.au.

Statement text © Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. substantive +525

    Rebrands as the Tax Ombudsman, adds AI call transcripts and case summaries, and relaxes staff rules so public AI tools may be used in low-risk situations.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    # AI transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. ## How the IGTOTax Ombudsman uses AI The IGTOTax Ombudsman is committed to the safe and responsible adoption of AI in our services. We are embedding a culture that fairly balances AI risk management and innovation. This statement will be updated as we introduce new uses for AI. Our current use of AI is solely for the benefit of improved efficiency in our internal processes. AI is only used in our complaints to keep people informed of complaint progress, although we are exploring chatbot technologynd to generate call transcripts. We are exploring use of AI to create initial draft content for review, generate case studies, and summarise content such as text, images, audio and video. We have no plans to apply AI in any decision making. The IGTOTax Ombudsman makes available to all staff a version of Microsoft Copilot that has enterprise data protection, meaning our data does not leave our ICT environment. The IGTOTax Ombudsman is using AI: - in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint process and routine communications, generating call transcripts and case summaries, but not decision making - in the domain of corporate and enabling, through the granting general access to Copilot for all staff, for example, budget management and development of corporate documentation - in the usage pattern of workplace productivity, such as by automating tasks and workflows, and summarising content - in the usage pattern of analytics for insights, such as by debugging code used in data analysis and extracting key themes from free text. ## AI safety and governance We have updated our ICT conditions of use policy to include the use of AI tools by all staff: - Staff are required to read and accept these conditions of use. - Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically. - Staff are strongly permittencouraged to use enterprise AI technology and are restricted from using less securools at all times. These have been configured to meet our information security requirements. Staff are permitted to input personal or sensitive information into these tools. - Staff are only allowed to use publicly available AI tools in low-risk situations that do not involve personal, sensitive forms of AI (i protected information. - In practice, we progressively restrict the URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use). The DTA policy requires the appointment of an accountable official. The IGTOTax Ombudsman has appointed its Chief Information & Security Officer (CISO). Our CISO is responsible for developing an IGTO Tax Ombudsman implementation plan, monitoring and measuring policy implementation, notifying the DTA of new high-risk AI use cases, facilitating cross-government coordination, staying updated with policy changes, and reviewing and updating the statement annually or when significant changes occur. The accountable official also reports to the eExecutive cCommittee which oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI. If you have any enquiries about this statement, please contact igt@igtenquiries@taxombudsman.gov.au.
    199ea1b
  2. noise -146

    The same statement text, now taken from a web page rather than a PDF, which drops the page footers and adds Markdown headings and bullets; the content is unchanged.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    taxombudsman.gov.au # AI transparency statement The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of AI in government sets out the Australian Government approach to embrace the opportunities of AI and provide for safe and responsible use of AI. ## How the IGTO uses AI  The IGTO is committed to the safe and responsible adoption of AI in our services. We are embedding a culture that fairly balances AI risk management and innovation. This statement will be updated as we introduce new uses for AI. Our current use of AI is solely for the benefit of improved efficiency in our internal processes. AI is only used in our complaints to keep people informed of complaint progress, although we are exploring chatbot technology. We have no plans to apply AI in any decision making. The IGTO makes available to all staff a version of Microsoft Copilot that has enterprise data protection, meaning our data does not leave our ICT environment. The IGTO is using AI: • - in the domain of service delivery, such as by automating parts of our complaint process and routine communications, but not decision making • - in the domain of corporate and enabling, through the granting general access to Copilot for all staff, for example, budget management and development of corporate documentation • - in the usage pattern of workplace productivity, such as by automating tasks and workflows, and summarising content • - in the usage pattern of analytics for insights, such as by debugging code used in data analysis and extracting key themes from free text. taxombudsman.gov.au ## AI safety and governance  We have updated our ICT conditions of use policy to include the use of AI tools by all staff: • - Staff are required to read and accept these conditions of use. • - Staff are required to use AI responsibly and ethically. • - Staff are only permitted to use enterprise AI technology and are restricted from using less secure forms of AI (in practice, we progressively restrict the URLs of AI tools deemed unfit for use). The DTA policy requires the appointment of an accountable official. The IGTO has appointed its Chief Information & Security Officer. Our CISO is responsible for developing an IGTO implementation plan, monitoring and measuring policy implementation, notifying the DTA of new high-risk AI use cases, facilitating cross- government coordination, staying updated with policy changes, and reviewing and updating the statement annually or when significant changes occur. The accountable official also reports to the executive committee which oversees any significant decisions regarding the use of AI. If you have any enquiries about this statement, please contact igt@igt.gov.au. taxombudsman.gov.au
    36b4ad4
  3. first tracked +2808

    First tracked version.

    05950e9