DHAC

Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Tracked since 11 Nov 2025 · 1 change of substance across 3 versions · last changed 26 Feb 2026

What’s changed

How to read this
  1. Tracking begins. The statement already existed, and doesn’t say when it was first published.

  2. substantive Rewrites its statement for policy v2.0. It now discloses Copilot use and training requirements, an AI subcommittee, an assurance framework and a use case register, drops the no-public-interaction claim and names a new AI team contact.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    • Discloses the 2024 Microsoft 365 Copilot trial, Copilot Chat for all staff and a phased rollout of licensed Copilot
    • Staff must complete AI fundamentals training before using Copilot
    • New AI Subcommittee (AISc) advising the Digital Committee
    • Discloses an AI assurance framework and an internal AI use case register that limits tools to approved uses
    • Adds policy and legal as an area of AI use, plus pattern and object identification and decision support
    • Restates its commitment: AI does not automate decisions, and humans stay accountable
    • Contact changed from the AI Accountable Official page to an AI team, which now also takes reports of AI safety concerns and incidents
    • Commits to continuous review of AI use and references policy v2.0, the APS AI Plan, the AI Ethics Principles and the impact assessment tool
    • Removed: statement that the department isn't using AI the public can directly interact with or be impacted by
    • Removed: commitment that a human will assess all AI outputs
    • Removed: commitment to meet DISR's proposed mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (human oversight): A human will assess all AI outputs to ensure accuracy
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will not): Will not use AI for decision making purposes
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Ensure policies meet proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings
    • Removed: Commitment dropped (will): Update this transparency statement if our approach changes
    • Removed: Safeguard dropped: human review of outputs
    • Added: AI use-case register: not mentioned → in place
    • Added: Domain added: policy and legal
    • Added: Named tool added: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
    • Added: New commitment (human oversight): Staff will explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Do not use AI to automate decisions; human officials remain fully accountable
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Restrict AI tools to approved use cases in the use case register
    • Added: New commitment (will not): Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information without assurance and governance approval
    • Added: New commitment (will): Continuously review AI use to protect the public and align with whole-of-government guidance
    • Added: New commitment (will): Staff must complete AI fundamentals training and acknowledge responsible use before accessing Copilot
    • Added: Safeguard added: acceptable use policy
    • Added: Safeguard added: audit or assurance
    • Added: Safeguard added: governance body
    • Added: Safeguard added: incident or concern reporting
    • Added: Safeguard added: privacy or security controls
    • Added: Safeguard added: risk assessment
    • Added: Safeguard added: staff training
    • Added: Safeguard added: use case register
    • Added: Staff training: not mentioned → mandatory
    • Added: Usage pattern added: decision making and administrative action
    • Added: Usage pattern added: image processing
    • Changed: Policy version referenced: v1 → v2
    • Changed: Public-facing AI use: none → not addressed
    • Changed: Stated last-updated date: 2025-05-20 → 2026-02-16
    Show the words that changed ↓

What the statement says

How to read this

The department uses generative and narrow AI, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, for analytics, workplace productivity, pattern and object recognition, and to support (not automate) decision making across policy, scientific, compliance, corporate and service delivery areas. It governs this through an AI Subcommittee, an AI assurance framework, an internal use case register and mandatory training before Copilot access, with the Chief Digital Information Officer as AI Accountable Official. read by Claude Opus 5.5

What it says AI is used for

  • Analytics for insights
  • Workplace productivity
  • Image processing
  • Decision making and administrative action
  • Policy and legal
  • Scientific
  • Compliance and fraud detection
  • Corporate and enabling
  • Service delivery

Named tools: Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat

Public-facing AI: not addressed

Safeguards named: risk assessment, audit or assurance, staff training, use-case register, incident or concern reporting, privacy or security controls, a governance body, an acceptable-use policy

The Standard’s eight elements 7 of 8

  • Found: Intentions behind AI use
  • Found: Use classified by DTA usage pattern or domain
  • Not found: Public-facing use addressed
  • Found: Monitoring and protection measures
  • Found: Compliance with the policy
  • Found: Compliance with legislation
  • Found: Date last updated
  • Found: Public contact

What the policy requires Policy v2.0

Accountable official
Chief Digital Information Officer
Strategic position on AI
not mentioned
AI use-case register
in place
Staff training
mandatory
Policy version referenced
version 2.0

What the AI Plan asks AI Plan

Chief AI Officer
not mentioned

Dates as of 12 Oct 2026

Review schedule
when the approach changes
Says it was last updated
16 Feb 2026
Last change we saw
26 Feb 2026
Updated since policy v2.0
yes
Annual review
stated date within the last year

Commitments

  • will not Do not use AI to automate decisions; human officials remain fully accountable
  • will not Restrict AI tools to approved use cases in the use case register
  • will not Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information without assurance and governance approval
  • human oversight Staff will explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI
  • will Use AI in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks, policies and best practice
  • will Continue to work closely with the DTA
  • will Develop internal Health and Aged Care AI policy and guidance aligned with the DTA's Policy
  • will Internal AI policies will apply to all employees, contractors and consultants
  • will Update statement as the department develops AI policies and implements AI technology
  • will Staff must complete AI fundamentals training and acknowledge responsible use before accessing Copilot
  • will Continuously review AI use to protect the public and align with whole-of-government guidance

The statement

How to read this

Our commitment to the safe, ethical, responsible and legal use of AI supports our vision to deliver better health and wellbeing for all Australians, now and for future generations.

We are aligning with the whole of government approach to AI. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government 2.0 sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI, along with the APS AI Plan, Standard for AI transparency statements and Guidance on government use of public generative AI tools. We identify, assess and manage AI use case impacts and risks informed by Australia's AI Ethics Principles and AI impact assessment tool.

Our adoption of AI will improve:

Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s Data and Digital Government Strategy in relation to adopting emerging technologies.

From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We have made Copilot Chat available to all staff and are rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot licenced version to staff in phases. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, our staff must complete AI fundamentals training that includes responsible and acceptable use of AI. We also require users to acknowledge safe, responsible and ethical use of AI before accessing and using generative AI tools.

We restrict the use of AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, to certain approved use cases in our use case register.

We use generative and narrow AI models in line with the DTA’s Classification systems for use.

  • analyse data to gain insights
  • automate activities to make tasks more efficient and increase workplace productivity
  • identify patterns and objects automatically
  • support decision making by helping staff summarise, analyse or synthesise information used to prepare advice or recommendations considered by our committees or decision makers.

We do not use AI to automate decisions. Human officials remain fully accountable for the advice and recommendations they provide.

We can use AI in these areas:

We set up an Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee (AISc) to guide our approach to AI. The AISc advises the Digital Committee which oversees our digital, data and ICT functions and capabilities and includes senior executive members from across the department. The AISc considers:

  • the application of AI within the Health portfolio’s policy and program context Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • the use and regulation of AI in the health, disability and aged care sectors Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • the use of AI within the department Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • the whole of government approach to AI and the intersection with health, disability and aged care sectors. Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

Our staff will be able to explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI.

We have an AI assurance framework in place. We also keep an internal register of AI use cases, in line with the whole-of-government approach. This register helps us see where AI is being used and monitor its usage properly.

We have measures in place to: Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

  • make sure AI is well governed and managed. Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information without approval through our assurance and governance processes
  • make AI use across the department visible, so we can govern it effectively and manage risks, assurance and reporting
  • encourage staff to use AI safely, responsibly, ethically and lawfully through corporate communications and training Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • support collaboration across the department and with other government agencies on AI use, including developing shared resources to ensure safe, responsible, ethical and lawful use. Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

We are committed to using AI in a safe, ethical, responsible and lawful way for the benefit of Australians. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable:

We remain committed to transparency and protecting the public. We will be transparent as we responsibly adopt evolving AI technology and policy requirements.

Safe and responsible AI adoption Also appears in 4 other agencies ACSQHC CDC NBA NDISQSC

We are developing internal AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DTA’s policy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. This includes our role in grants, procurement, regulation and policy making related to AI.

We will leverage whole-of-government policies and develop internal policies and guidance materials when necessary for: Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

  • AI Governance and approval processes Also appears in 2 other agencies ACSQHC NBA
  • acceptable use of AI in the department
  • Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations Also appears in 3 other agencies ACSQHC CDC NBA
  • procurement of AI systems Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • risk mitigation and technical guardrails Also appears in 3 other agencies ACSQHC CDC NBA
  • roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. Also appears in 3 other agencies ACSQHC CDC NBA

These internal policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. Also appears in 3 other agencies ACSQHC CDC NBA

We will update this transparency statement as we continue to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology. We will continuously review our use of AI to:

  • protect the public against negative impacts Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • reflect the pace of technological change Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • manage the evolving risk environment Also appears in 1 other agency CDC
  • align with whole-of-government guidance. Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official. (Template language)

Contact us for questions about our AI transparency statement, our use of AI, or to report AI safety concerns, including AI-related incidents. Also appears in 1 other agency CDC

Statement text © Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. Most agency content is CC BY 4.0; check the original for its terms.

Every version

Every copy the daily scrape saved that differed from the one before, including minor edits. Pick a dot to see the statement as it was then.

  1. noise -414

    No change to the statement itself; a contact icon image and the site's page-feedback form dropped out of the capture.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    Our commitment to the safe, ethical, responsible and legal use of AI supports our vision to deliver better health and wellbeing for all Australians, now and for future generations. We are aligning with the whole of government approach to AI. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability) 2.0 sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI, along with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan), [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Guidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). We identify, assess and manage AI use case impacts and risks informed by [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction "https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction"). ## Why we use AI Our adoption of AI will improve: - service delivery - policy outcomes - efficiency - productivity. Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. ## How we use AI From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We have made Copilot Chat available to all staff and are rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot licenced version to staff in phases. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, our staff must complete [AI fundamentals training](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-training) that includes responsible and acceptable use of AI. We also require users to acknowledge safe, responsible and ethical use of AI before accessing and using generative AI tools. We restrict the use of AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, to certain approved use cases in our use case register. We use [generative and narrow AI models](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption/mitigating-risks-and-harms) in line with the DTA’s [Classification systems for use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification). ### What we use AI for We can use AI to: - analyse data to gain insights - automate activities to make tasks more efficient and increase workplace productivity - identify patterns and objects automatically - support decision making by helping staff summarise, analyse or synthesise information used to prepare advice or recommendations considered by our committees or decision makers. We do not use AI to automate decisions. Human officials remain fully accountable for the advice and recommendations they provide. ### Where we use AI We can use AI in these areas: - policy and legal - scientific - compliance and fraud detection - corporate and enabling - service delivery. ## Our approach with AI We set up an Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee (AISc) to guide our approach to AI. The AISc advises the Digital Committee which oversees our digital, data and ICT functions and capabilities and includes senior executive members from across the department. The AISc considers: - the application of AI within the Health portfolio’s policy and program context - the use and regulation of AI in the health, disability and aged care sectors - the use of AI within the department - the whole of government approach to AI and the intersection with health, disability and aged care sectors. Our staff will be able to explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI. We have an AI assurance framework in place. We also keep an internal register of AI use cases, in line with the whole-of-government approach. This register helps us see where AI is being used and monitor its usage properly. We have measures in place to: - make sure AI is well governed and managed. Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information without approval through our assurance and governance processes - make AI use across the department visible, so we can govern it effectively and manage risks, assurance and reporting - encourage staff to use AI safely, responsibly, ethically and lawfully through corporate communications and training - support collaboration across the department and with other government agencies on AI use, including developing shared resources to ensure safe, responsible, ethical and lawful use. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI in a safe, ethical, responsible and lawful way for the benefit of Australians. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable: - laws - frameworks - policies - best practice. We remain committed to transparency and protecting the public. We will be transparent as we responsibly adopt evolving AI technology and policy requirements. ## Safe and responsible AI adoption We are developing internal AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DTA’s policy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. This includes our role in grants, procurement, regulation and policy making related to AI. We will leverage whole-of-government policies and develop internal policies and guidance materials when necessary for: - AI Governance and approval processes - acceptable use of AI in the department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - record keeping - security - procurement of AI systems - risk mitigation and technical guardrails - roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internal policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. We will update this transparency statement as we continue to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology. We will continuously review our use of AI to: - protect the public against negative impacts - reflect the pace of technological change - manage the evolving risk environment - align with whole-of-government guidance. ## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official. ![](https://www.health.gov.au/themes/custom/hga/images/contact-aus-gov.png) ### [ AI team ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-team?language=en) Contact us for questions about our AI transparency statement, our use of AI, or to report AI safety concerns, including AI-related incidents. [AI@health.gov.au](mailto:AI@health.gov.au) Date last updated: 16 February 2026 Tags: - [About the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/about-the-department) **Is there anything wrong with this page?** ## Help us improve health.gov.au If you would like a response please provide an email address. Your email address is covered by our [privacy policy](https://www.health.gov.au/node/6186). Email address What you were doing? (mandatory) What went wrong? (mandatory) Leave this field blank
    2f42e3a
  2. substantive +2850

    Rewrites its statement for policy v2.0. It now discloses Copilot use and training requirements, an AI subcommittee, an assurance framework and a use case register, drops the no-public-interaction claim and names a new AI team contact.

    read by Claude Opus 5.5
    The words that changed
    The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’sOur commitment to the safe and, ethical, responsible and legal use of AI supports our vision to deliver better health and wellbeing for all Australians, now and for future generations. We are aligning with the whole of government approach to AI. The Digital Transformation Agency’s (DTA) [Policy for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Policy%20for%20the%20responsible%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20government%20v1.1.pdf)ai/ai-in-government-policy/accountability) 2.0 sets a framework for the Australian Government’s safe, responsible, adoption and use of AI. A, along with the [APS AI Plan](https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan), [Standard for AI transparency statements](https://www.digital.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/Standard%20for%20AI%20transparency%20statements%20v1.1.pdf) and [Interim gGuidance on government use of public generative AI tools](https://architecture.digital.gov.au/guidance-generative-ai). ## Why we use AI To achieve our vision in delivering better health and wellbeing for all Australians, the department commits to the safe and responsible adoption of AI to take advantage of the various benefits the technology provides. ## How we use AI The department We identify, assess and manage AI use case impacts and risks informed by [Australia's AI Ethics Principles](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-ai-ethics-principles) and [AI impact assessment tool](https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction "https://www.digital.gov.au/ai/impact-assessment-tool/introduction"). ## Why we use AI Our adoption of AI will improve: - service delivery - policy outcomes - efficiency - productivity. Our commitment to digital innovation aligns with the Australian Government’s [Data and Digital Government Strategy](https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/strategy/missions/government-for-the-future#adopt_emerging_technologies) in relation to adopting emerging technologies. ## How we use AI From 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, we participated in the Australian Government’s trials of a generative AI service, Microsoft 365 Copilot. We have made Copilot Chat available to all staff and are rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot licenced version to staff in phases. As a prerequisite to using Copilot, our staff must complete [AI fundamentals training](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/staff-training) that includes responsible and acceptable use of AI. We also require users to acknowledge safe, responsible and ethical use of AI before accessing and using generative AI tools. We restrict the use of AI tools, including Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat, to certain approved use cases in our use case register. We uses [generative](https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/generative-ai.html) and narrow model AI I and narrow AI models](https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/guidance-for-ai-adoption/mitigating-risks-and-harms) in line with the DTA’s [Classification systems for use](https://www.digital.gov.au/policy/ai/resources/use-classification) as below: **Usage patterns:** for. ### What we use AI for We can use AI to: - analysinge data to gain insights and - automatinge activities to make tasks more efficient and increase workplace productivity. This allows staff to focus on more complex and mean - identify patterns and objects automatically - support decision making by helping staff summarise, analyse or synthesise information used to prepare advice or recommendations considered by our committees or decision makers. We do not use AI to automate decisions. Human officials remaing ful work. **Domains:** includely accountable for the advice and recommendations they provide. ### Where we use AI We can use AI in these areas: - policy and legal - scientific, - compliance and fraud detection, - corporate and enabling and - service delivery. ## Our approach with AI A human will assess all AI outputs to ensWe set up an Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee (AISc) to guide oure accuracy. We will not use AI for decision making purposes. The department isn’t using AI applications where the public can directly interact with or be impactpproach to AI. The AISc advises the Digital Committee which oversees our digital, data and ICT functions and capabilities and includes senior executive members from across the department. The AISc considers: - the application of AI within the Health portfolio’s policy and program context - the use and regulation of AI in the health, disability and aged care sectors - the use of AI within the department - the whole of government approach to AI and the intersection with health, disability and aged care sectors. Our staff will be able to explain, justify and take ownership of advice and decisions informed by AI. We will update this transparency statement if have an AI assurance framework in place. We also keep an internal register of AI use cases, in line with the whole-of-government approach. This register helps us see where AI is being used and monitor its usage properly. We have measures in place to: - make sure AI is well governed and managed. Staff cannot use sensitive or personal information withourt approach changes. ## Our commitment Tval through our assurance and governance processes - make AI use across the department vis committed to using AI in a responsible and transparent way. Our AI initiatives will alignible, so we can govern it effectively and manage risks, assurance and reporting - encourage staff to use AI safely, responsibly, ethically and lawfully through corporate communications and training - support collaboration across the department and with othe APS values and have the publics’ best interest at heartr government agencies on AI use, including developing shared resources to ensure safe, responsible, ethical and lawful use. ## Our commitment We are committed to using AI in a safe, ethical, responsible and lawful way for the benefit of Australians. We will continue to work closely with the DTA and use AI in accordance with applicable: - legislation - regulationaws - frameworks - policies - best practice. ## Safe and responsible AI adoption We remain committed to transparency and protecting the public. We will be transparent as we adopt responsibly theadopt evolving AI technology and policy requirements. The department is developing internal Health and Aged Care ## Safe and responsible AI adoption We are developing internal AI policy and guidance material. These will align with the DTA’s Ppolicy, advice and guidance on the safe, responsible and ethical use of AI. We will make sureThis includes our prolicies meet the proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings that are underway by the Department of Industry, Science and Resourcese in grants, procurement, regulation and policy making related to AI. We will leverage whole -of Australian G-government policies and develop internal policies and guidance materials when necessary for: - AI Governance and approval processes - acceptable use of AI in the department - ethical considerations - Freedom of Information (FOI) considerations - record keeping - security, - procurement of AI systems - risk mitigation and technical guardrails - roles and responsibilities when using AI and required training for identified roles. These internal policies will apply to all employees (including contractors) and consultants. We will update this transparency statement as the departmentwe continues to develop policies on AI usage and to implement AI technology. ## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official for the department. For questions about this statement or the department’s use of AI, you can contact We will continuously review our use of AI to: - protect the public against negative impacts - reflect the pace of technological change - manage the evolving risk environment - align with whole-of-government guidance. ## Contact The Chief Digital Information Officer is our AI Accountable Official. ![](https://www.health.gov.au/themes/custom/hga/images/contact-aus-gov.png) ### [ AI Accountable Officialteam ](https://www.health.gov.au/contacts/ai-accountable-officialteam?language=en) Contact our AI Accountable Official for questions about the department’s use of AIus for questions about our AI transparency statement, our use of AI, or to report AI safety concerns, including AI-related incidents. [AI@health.gov.au](mailto:AI@health.gov.au) Date last updated: 20 Ma16 February 20256 Tags: - [About the department](https://www.health.gov.au/topics/about-the-department) **Is there anything wrong with this page?** ## Help us improve health.gov.au If you would like a response please provide an email address. Your email address is covered by our [privacy policy](https://www.health.gov.au/node/6186). Email address What you were doing? (mandatory) What went wrong? (mandatory) Leave this field blank
    aa4fa18
  3. first tracked +4550

    First tracked version.

    b7e2a3d