What the statements say
Version 2.0 of the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government took effect on 15 December 2025. Agencies must set a strategic position on AI within six months, and set up a use-case register and mandatory staff training within twelve. Separately, the APS AI Plan asked each agency to appoint a Chief AI Officer by July 2026. This page reads all 121 statements against these requirements, as of 13 Oct 2026. The figures count what the statements say, as read by a language model.
How these figures are made- Cover all eight Standard elements
- 67 of 121
- Say a Chief AI Officer is in place
- 39 (+1 planned)
- Say they use no public-facing AI
- 59 (49%)
What the statements report, month by month
The share of tracked statements that report each item, by month. Dashed lines mark the policy’s start, its six- and twelve-month deadlines, and the AI Plan’s Chief AI Officer deadline. Agencies joined the tracker in waves (mostly in November 2025 and June 2026), so a rise can come from new statements rather than new text. Open “Figures” under a chart for the counts.
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 1 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 1 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 1 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 6 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 11 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 15 | 88 |
| May 26 | 19 | 90 |
| June 26 | 27 | 113 |
| July 26 | 31 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 33 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 38 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 39 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 1 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 1 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 1 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 8 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 14 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 20 | 88 |
| May 26 | 24 | 90 |
| June 26 | 31 | 113 |
| July 26 | 33 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 34 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 39 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 40 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 6 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 6 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 6 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 10 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 12 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 16 | 88 |
| May 26 | 16 | 90 |
| June 26 | 19 | 113 |
| July 26 | 19 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 22 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 22 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 21 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 9 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 9 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 9 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 12 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 14 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 15 | 88 |
| May 26 | 15 | 90 |
| June 26 | 24 | 113 |
| July 26 | 27 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 29 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 32 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 32 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 20 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 22 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 22 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 37 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 36 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 39 | 88 |
| May 26 | 41 | 90 |
| June 26 | 49 | 113 |
| July 26 | 51 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 52 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 55 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 55 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 0 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 0 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 0 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 5 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 10 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 12 | 88 |
| May 26 | 16 | 90 |
| June 26 | 20 | 113 |
| July 26 | 20 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 21 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 21 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 21 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 47 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 48 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 48 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 63 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 59 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 62 | 88 |
| May 26 | 63 | 90 |
| June 26 | 84 | 113 |
| July 26 | 88 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 88 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 89 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 89 | 121 |
Figures
| Month | Statements | Tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 | 12 | 61 |
| Dec 25 | 12 | 64 |
| Jan 26 | 12 | 64 |
| Feb 26 | 15 | 83 |
| Mar 26 | 15 | 83 |
| Apr 26 | 14 | 88 |
| May 26 | 15 | 90 |
| June 26 | 19 | 113 |
| July 26 | 17 | 117 |
| Aug 26 | 17 | 118 |
| Sept 26 | 18 | 121 |
| Oct 26 | 18 | 121 |
Promises, limits and safeguards that one version of a statement made and the next didn’t, newest first. A promise the next version reports done is kept, not dropped, and is not listed. Some were only reworded (why), so each links to the diff.
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will not): AI will not be combined with automated decision making (ADM) programs
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will): Developing an AI Strategy and Roadmap for the coming 12–18 months
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will): Periodically review governance arrangements and statement to remain compliant with the Policy
- Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation Commitment dropped (will not): AI tools do not have direct access to ARPC's internal systems or information
- Organ and Tissue Authority Commitment dropped (will): Be transparent as we explore, adopt and integrate AI technology
- Department of Industry, Science and Resources Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
Show all 128
- Australian Electoral Commission Commitment dropped (will not): Staff not to use AI as part of any AEC interaction with the public
- Australian Electoral Commission Commitment dropped (will): Staff must complete internal generative AI training before using Copilot
- Australian Electoral Commission Safeguard dropped: staff training
- Commonwealth Grants Commission Commitment dropped (will): Staff must complete internal AI training as a prerequisite to using AI tools
- Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will not): Staff permitted only enterprise AI; less secure AI tools restricted
- Department of Social Services Commitment dropped (will not): Technological controls restrict access to publicly available AI tools from the DSS ICT environment
- Department of Social Services Commitment dropped (will): Every AI use case will have approved KPIs to track outcomes and measure effectiveness
- Net Zero Economy Authority Commitment dropped (will not): AI input must not include or reveal classified, sensitive or personal information
- Net Zero Economy Authority Commitment dropped (will not): Will not use AI where the public directly interacts or is significantly impacted without a human intermediary
- Net Zero Economy Authority Commitment dropped (will): Only AI tools authorised for access and use within PM&C's ICT systems are deployed
- Net Zero Economy Authority Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
- Net Zero Economy Authority Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
- Australian Communications and Media Authority Commitment dropped (will): If plans change on public-facing AI, will update this statement to detail AI use
- Australian Communications and Media Authority Commitment dropped (will): Will be transparent in internal use of AI as we explore, evaluate and adopt it
- Workplace Gender Equality Agency Commitment dropped (will): Will develop a responsible AI usage policy aligned with DTA resources
- Australian Office of Financial Management Commitment dropped (will): Publish an annual AI Transparency Statement on how AI is used and managed
- Australian Law Reform Commission Commitment dropped (will not): Do not distribute sensitive material to third parties by pasting it into AI software
- Australian Law Reform Commission Commitment dropped (will): Staff must acknowledge the AI use policy before accessing any generative AI tools
- Australian Law Reform Commission Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
- Australian Trade and Investment Commission Commitment dropped (will): Develop a security risk management plan and ethics assessment for any proposed AI tool
- Australian Trade and Investment Commission Commitment dropped (will): Update this transparency statement when Austrade approves AI solutions for use
- Australian Transport Safety Bureau Commitment dropped (will): Will update this statement if it begins using AI in public-facing services
- Australian Transport Safety Bureau Safeguard dropped: governance body
- National Health Funding Body Commitment dropped (will not): AI-assisted outputs will not be used for decision making purposes
- National Health Funding Body Commitment dropped (will): Develop internal policies on AI governance, acceptable use, privacy, security, risk and required training
- National Health Funding Body Commitment dropped (will): Ensure conformance with proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Commitment dropped (human oversight): Each AI use case and technology requires Ombudsman approval after ITGC endorsement
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): AI coding assistants used only for approved use cases; all AI-assisted code tested for accuracy before implementation
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): Statement reviewed annually or when AI use cases and usage change
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): Will be transparent in assessment, adoption and monitoring of AI technology
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: testing or evaluation
- Safe Work Australia Commitment dropped (will not): Do not propose to use AI where the public may directly interact with or be significantly impacted by it
- Safe Work Australia Commitment dropped (will): Adapt AI systems and advice to align with evolving legislation, ethical standards and public expectations
- Safe Work Australia Commitment dropped (will): Any changes to AI use will result in an update to the transparency statement
- Safe Work Australia Commitment dropped (will): Release an annual AI transparency statement on how AI is used and managed
- Safe Work Australia Commitment dropped (will): Will only use AI services in accordance with applicable legislation, regulations, frameworks and policies
- Safe Work Australia Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
- Safe Work Australia Safeguard dropped: incident or concern reporting
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will not): AI tools must not access restricted information, perform illegal activities, or assess staff performance
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will not): Email accounts not used with public AI services without approval
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will not): Official information must not be entered into public AI services unless already public
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): AI technologies adopted only after thorough risk assessment and monitored for compliance
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): Administrative decisions aided by AI will be clearly indicated
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): Automated decision-making tools need significant risk assessment and approval
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): Commercial AI tools require executive approval
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): Continuous monitoring so AI policies, tools and usage remain current, overseen by internal governance mechanisms
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Commitment dropped (will): Misuse or identified risks must be reported immediately
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Safeguard dropped: incident or concern reporting
- Commonwealth Grants Commission Commitment dropped (will): Impacted staff will have access to training aligned with responsible and acceptable use of AI policies
- National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority Commitment dropped (will): All staff will receive training on the responsible use of AI
- National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority Commitment dropped (will): Committed to keeping stakeholders informed about AI initiatives
- National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority Commitment dropped (will): Will review this statement annually or whenever significant changes occur in approach to AI
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will not): Does not allow AI for fully automated output processes
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will not): Public will not interact with a chatbot or similar AI agent when contacting the department
- Department of Education Commitment dropped (will): Establishing review structures for new uses of AI
- Department of Education Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
- Department of Industry, Science and Resources Commitment dropped (will): Own AI adoption adheres to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Commitment dropped (will): Be clear if AI becomes part of a decision-making process
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Commitment dropped (will): Maintain an internal responsible AI usage policy aligned with DTA and APSC guidance
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Commitment dropped (will): Provide internal support and means for staff to report AI concerns or queries
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Safeguard dropped: audit or assurance
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Safeguard dropped: incident or concern reporting
- Australian Skills Quality Authority Commitment dropped (will): Statement reviewed and updated annually or when significant changes occur
- National Indigenous Australians Agency Commitment dropped (will): Abide by PM&C ICT and AI policies, which take precedence over this statement where they conflict
- National Indigenous Australians Agency Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Commitment dropped (will not): Has not authorised AI use in service delivery, including regulatory function or decision-making processes
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Commitment dropped (will): Statement will be reviewed annually or when significant change is made to AI approach
- Digital Transformation Agency Commitment dropped (will): Statement updated as approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (human oversight): AI supports operations but does not replace human judgment in areas affecting people's lives
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (human oversight): All AI outputs are checked by a human before they are applied or acted on
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Develop training and support information relevant to the Commission
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Ensure AI use is appropriately governed and risks are identified and managed
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Ensure compliance with applicable legislation and regulations in any AI use
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Make efforts to protect the public against negative impacts of AI
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Monitor AI access and usage and the effectiveness of deployed AI systems
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Commitment dropped (will): Review and update the statement annually or on significant change to approach to AI
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Safeguard dropped: human review of outputs
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Safeguard dropped: risk assessment
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Safeguard dropped: staff training
- Screen Australia Commitment dropped (will): Staff may use AI tools only if the agency has approved them
- Screen Australia Commitment dropped (will): Statement updated as approach to AI changes, and at least every 12 months
- Australian Law Reform Commission Commitment dropped (will): Staff must complete internal generative AI training before using Copilot
- Asbestos and Silica Safety and Eradication Agency Commitment dropped (will): Ethical and responsible AI training mandatory for all staff before using any AI tools
- Australian Taxation Office Commitment dropped (will not): We do not use AI for administrative action
- Department of Finance Commitment dropped (human oversight): Limit AI to low-risk use cases: no direct public interaction or significant impact without human intervention
- Department of Finance Commitment dropped (will): Reassess use cases on notable change, life-cycle progression, or identified AI risk or harm
- Department of Finance Commitment: no public-facing AI without a human removed
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): AI governance framework will follow OAIC best practice guidance on commercial AI and personal information
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): All AI initiatives will align with the Protective Security Policy Framework and Information Security Manual
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): Consult employees about the potential use of AI in the workplace
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): Develop internal policies to guide AI use and provide training to build staff capability
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): Establish a new internal governance body to provide strategic direction and monitor AI initiatives
- Fair Work Ombudsman Commitment dropped (will): If personal information is used in AI, comply with Australian Privacy Principles and explain its use transparently
- Fair Work Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
- Fair Work Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: governance body
- Fair Work Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: privacy or security controls
- Fair Work Ombudsman Safeguard dropped: staff training
- Australian Office of Financial Management Safeguard dropped: governance body
- Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre Commitment dropped (will): Apply proportionate and targeted risk mitigations for AI use cases
- Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre Commitment dropped (will): Evaluate AI pilots in alignment with the Policy for Responsible Use of AI and internal AUSTRAC AI Policy
- Climate Change Authority Commitment dropped (will): Will explore staff AI use with DCCEEW as ICT provider, within ICT system constraints
- Climate Change Authority Commitment dropped (will): Will regularly review policy compliance through existing governance and risk management processes
- Clean Energy Regulator Commitment dropped (will): Provide regular updates on AI initiatives and their outcomes on our website
- Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water Commitment dropped (will): Report any high-risk use cases surfaced through the register to the DTA in line with the Policy
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageing Commitment dropped (human oversight): A human will assess all AI outputs to ensure accuracy
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageing Commitment dropped (will not): Will not use AI for decision making purposes
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageing Commitment dropped (will): Ensure policies meet proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageing Commitment dropped (will): Update this transparency statement if our approach changes
- Department of Health, Disability and Ageing Safeguard dropped: human review of outputs
- Department of Social Services Commitment dropped (will): Will make efforts to protect the public against negative impacts
- Department of Social Services Commitment dropped (will): Will review and update the statement annually or on significant change to AI approach
- Department of Veterans' Affairs Commitment dropped (human oversight): All CLIKChat information is checked by staff, with human judgement always in control
- Department of Veterans' Affairs Commitment dropped (will): Will monitor usage to assure ongoing suitability of AI technologies
- Department of Veterans' Affairs Commitment dropped (will): Will review and update the statement annually or when significant changes occur
- National Archives of Australia Commitment dropped (will): Will continue to update this transparency statement to reflect implementation and adoption of AI
- National Blood Authority Commitment dropped (will): Statement will be reviewed annually or on any significant change to our approach to AI
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Safeguard dropped: acceptable use policy
- Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Commitment dropped (will): Update the statement if the approach to AI changes, and at least every twelve months
Other answers dropped between versions
39Uses, domains, tools, officers, training and compliance statements that one version mentioned and the next didn’t. A tool may have been renamed, and a use may continue without being mentioned.
- Department of Education Strategic position on AI: planned → not mentioned
- Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation Named tool dropped: ChatGPT
- Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation Named tool dropped: Microsoft 365 Copilot
- Department of Industry, Science and Resources Domain dropped: compliance and fraud detection
- Fair Work Ombudsman Chief AI Officer: in place → not mentioned
- Fair Work Ombudsman Legislative compliance statement removed
Show all 39
- Department of Veterans' Affairs Usage pattern dropped: decision making and administrative action
- Australian Electoral Commission Staff training: mandatory → not mentioned
- Commonwealth Grants Commission Public contact removed
- Australian Communications and Media Authority Strategic position on AI: in place → not mentioned
- Australian Trade and Investment Commission Usage pattern dropped: decision making and administrative action
- Sport Integrity Australia Public contact removed
- Australian Transport Safety Bureau Policy compliance statement removed
- Australian Transport Safety Bureau Strategic position on AI: planned → not mentioned
- National Health Funding Body Staff training: mandatory → not mentioned
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Named tool dropped: Azure AI Text to Speech
- Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman Staff training: mandatory → available
- Safe Work Australia Legislative compliance statement removed
- Safe Work Australia Policy compliance statement removed
- National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority Staff training: mandatory → available
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Domain dropped: service delivery
- National Indigenous Australians Agency Legislative compliance statement removed
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Strategic position on AI: planned → not mentioned
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Domain dropped: corporate and enabling
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Domain dropped: policy and legal
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Intentions behind AI use removed
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Legislative compliance statement removed
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Monitoring and protection measures removed
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Named tool dropped: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Staff training: mandatory → not mentioned
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Usage pattern dropped: analytics for insights
- Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission Usage pattern dropped: workplace productivity
- Department of Finance Named tool dropped: ChatGPT
- Department of Finance Named tool dropped: Claude
- Department of Finance Named tool dropped: Gemini
- Fair Work Ombudsman Domain dropped: service delivery
- Fair Work Ombudsman Named tool dropped: Microsoft 365 Copilot
- Fair Work Ombudsman Staff training: available → not mentioned
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Named tool dropped: Microsoft 365 Copilot
Who is in charge
39 statements say a Chief AI Officer is in place and 1 say one is planned. Most don’t say which job holds each role; those that do are counted below (job titles only, never names).
Accountable official
- 23 Chief Information Officer
- 10 Chief Operating Officer
- 5 Chief Data Officer
- 2 AI Accountable Official
- 2 Chief Digital Officer
- 2 Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer
- 1 AASB-AUASB Managing Director; AASB-AUASB Chief Operating Officer; AASB-AUASB Business Services Manager
- 1 AASB-AUASB Managing Director; Chief Operating Officer; AASB-AUASB Business Services Manager
Chief AI Officer
- 3 Chief AI Officer
- 2 Chief Operating Officer
- 1 Assistant Director-General, Technology
- 1 Assistant Inspector-General, Agency Oversight
- 1 Chief Data and AI Officer
- 1 Chief Data and Analytics Officer
- 1 Chief Data Officer
- 1 Chief Digital and Data Officer
AI and the public
The Standard asks each agency to say whether the public may interact with, or be significantly affected by, its AI without a human in the loop.
- Say they use no public-facing AI
- 59 (49%)
- Say they use it with human review
- 27 (22%)
- Say they use it, without stating human review
- 7 (6%)
- Don’t address it, or not clearly
- 28 (23%)
- Commit to a human intermediary
- 18 (15%)
The Standard’s eight elements
The DTA’s Standard for AI transparency statements lists what every statement must contain. 67 of 121 cover all eight. A date shown on the page counts as a “date last updated”.
Dates and updates
The Standard requires statements to be “reviewed and updated” at least once a year and whenever the agency’s approach to AI changes, and to say when they were last updated. 18 statements give no date.
No update seen since policy v2.0 8
Statements we have watched since before 15 December 2025 with no stated date or observed change after it. Another 8 were first tracked after that date and give no date, so we can’t tell.
- Australian Institute of Family Studies · says 29 Oct 2025
- Australian Maritime Safety Authority · says 4 Aug 2025
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · says 6 Nov 2025
- Food Standards Australia New Zealand · says 27 Mar 2025
- Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority · says Nov 2025
- National Film and Sound Archive of Australia
- Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility · says Feb 2025
- Services Australia · says 10 Oct 2025
Say they were last updated over a year ago 7
The statement’s own last-updated date is more than a year before 13 Oct 2026.
- Australian Digital Health Agency · says Feb 2025
- Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility · says Feb 2025
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare · says 13 Mar 2025
- Food Standards Australia New Zealand · says 27 Mar 2025
- Australian Maritime Safety Authority · says 4 Aug 2025
- National Emergency Management Agency · says 18 Sept 2025
- Services Australia · says 10 Oct 2025